Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A first-order difference equation gives the value of a variable x at some reference point t + 1 as a function of the value of the same variable at the reference point t . So, a first order difference equation has the general form x t +1 = F ( x t ) . For our purposes, the reference point will denote a
time period and will be indexed t = 0,1,..., . The equilibrium in first order difference equations
x t +1 = + x t ,
(1.1)
where > 0 and > 1 are constant parameters and the initial value x 0 > 0 is given. Given equation (1), the steady state equilibrium is
= + x x
= x
. 1
(1.2)
, the variable will not reach the equilibrium is. To understand this, think that unless x 0 = x
equilibrium automatically. Instead, it will go through an adjustment period which, eventually, may lead to the steady-state only if this represents a stable equilibrium. However, if the stability conditions are not satisfied then the steady-state will never be actually reached: this implies that the long-run equilibrium is trivial. Ideally, we would like to analyse these issues in a formal manner. To do this, we need an expression that relates x t as a function of its initial value x 0 . We can begin by evaluating equation (1.1) at the initial period t = 0 . That is
x 1 = + x 0 .
(2.1)
x 2 = + ( + x 0 )
x 2 = + + 2 x 0 .
Next, use (2.1) for t = 2 and substitute (2.3). That is (2.3)
x 3 = + x 2 = + ( + + 2 x 0 ) x 3 = + + 2 + 3 x 0 x 3 = (1 + + 2 ) + 3 x 0 (2.4)
From (2.4) you can see a clear pattern emerging a pattern which facilitates us in making a conclusion about the general result we are going to get without the need of making these substitutions continuously. Particularly, using (2.4) as our guide, we can infer that, for an arbitrary period t , we have
x t = (1 + + 2 + ... + t 1 ) + t x 0 .
(2.5)
, will Now we can examine whether the dynamic adjustment, starting from a point x 0 x
eventually lead us to the steady-state equilibrium or not. Using equation (2.5), we can get
(2.6)
As long as
1 1
and lim t = 0 .
t
. We conclude that the dynamics beginning from any x 0 > 0 , will eventually lead 1
. For this reason, we say that x is a stable equilibrium. us to the steady-state equilibrium x
Let
t
us
now
examine
what
happens
t
when
> 1.
In
this
case,
3 Phase diagrams
Phase diagrams provide a nice illustration of both the long-run (steady-state) equilibrium and the short-run dynamic behaviour (i.e., the transitional dynamics) of a variable generated by a difference equation. The procedure of constructing phase diagrams is the following: 1. Place the x t +1 values on the vertical axis and the x t values on the horizontal axis. 2. Draw the x t +1 = + x t schedule. 3. Draw a 45 line beginning from the origin (i.e., a line for which x t +1 = x t ). The points
then, draw a horizontal line to meet the 45 lineand so on. Below you can see three phase diagrams corresponding to the different scenarios we have for the equation x t +1 = + x t .
x t +1 x t +1 = x t x t +1 = + x t
x
xt
x t +1 x t +1 = x t
x t +1 = + x t
xt
x t +1
x t +1 = + x t x t +1 = x t
xt
Figure 3: > 1
x t +1 = x t .
(4.1)
is x = 0 . Once more, the stability You can clearly see that the only value satisfying x t +1 = x t = x
of the steady-state solution depends on the value of . To see this, set = 0 in equation (2.5) to get
xt = t x0 ,
and, subsequently,
(4.2)
lim x t = x 0 lim t .
t t
(4.3)
: x = 0 is a beginning from any x 0 > 0 , will eventually lead to the steady-state equilibrium x stable equilibrium (note: we do not consider < 0 now, because it does not make sense if we are interested in non-negative x t 's ).
5
What happens when > 1 ? Given lim t , the dynamics beginning from any x 0 > 0 , will
t
= 0 . Instead, as t , x t : x = 0 is an never lead to the steady-state equilibrium x unstable equilibrium. With these extreme implications, does the above analysis imply that the case where = 0 is trivial and unimportant? The answer is no. This case has important implications for variables that grow over time. To see this, divide both sides of (4.1) with x t and subtract 1 from both sides. This yields
x t +1 x xt 1 = t +1 = 1. xt xt
(4.4)
This expression shows the growth rate of the variable x t and clarifies the reason why we get such extreme implications. On the one hand, for > 1 the variable has a positive growth rate which implies that it constantly increases in value over time. On the other hand, for < 1 the variable has a negative growth rate: it constantly declines in value over time until it settles down to zero.
x t +1 = x t (1 x t ) . x = F(x ) . However, the Once more, the steady-state is a solution that satisfies x t +1 = x t = x
stability condition is different compared with the linear case. Specifically, the equilibrium is stable as long as ) < 1 F ( x
)<1 1 < F ( x
holds. Thus, stability requires that the first derivative of F ( ) with respect to x t is below 1 in
. You do absolute value when evaluated at the steady-state that is, when evaluated at x t = x
not need to know the proof for this, but for those interested the proof will be presented here.
. Doing Firstly, we take a first order linear approximation of F ( x t ) around the steady state x
this, we have
) + F ( x )( x t x ), F(xt ) F(x
= F(x ) . Substituting this together with x t +1 = F ( x t ) above, we get The steady-state satisfies x
, = F ( x ) . Therefore, the equilibrium z t = 0 is possible when < 1 . But recall that z t = x t x is stable when F ( x ) < 1. steady state equilibrium z t = 0 x t = x