Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doctor of Philosophy
Adventist International Institute
of Advanced Studies
Theological Seminary
TITLE: A DIVINE CALL TO RELATIONSHIP AND A COVENANTAL
RENEWAL IN DEUTERONOMY 28:69-30:20: A SYNTAGMATIC
SYNTACTIC AND TEXT-LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
Researcher: Emmer Chacon
Research advisor: David Tasker, PhD
Date completed: October 2010
This study uses a linguistic approach and applies syntagmatics, syntax and
textlinguistics procedures to the Hebrew text of Deut 28:69-30:20 in order to assess what
the linguistic information thus obtained might contribute for the understanding of the
literary, structural and theological aspects portrayed in this passage.
Chapter 1 surveys the methodology that is applied to the text in Chapters 2 and 3
generating structural and theological information that Chapters 4 and 5 analyze. Finally,
Chapter 6 provides a general summary, methodological evaluation, conclusions, and
recommendations
This investigation has demonstrated that in Deut 28:69-30:20 vocabulary,
grammar, micro and macrosyntax, rhetoric and pragmalinguistic are highly crafted with
literary cohesion and coherence to convey the theology of the text. Textlinguistics
allowed identifying rhetorical strategies in Deut 28:69-30:20. These strategies seek to
provide a speech that combines a high level of organization and art while conveying a
message. These strategies enhance persuasion and memory. Repetition carries on motifs
through the speech and portrays more than one aspect of the issue or even return to the
topic after a digression. The changes in personal pronouns display harmonic patterns that
allow the speaker to argue with the individual while addressing the multitude. Temporal
patterns provide the presentation of a comprehensive covenantal programmatic offer for
the future of the audience. This offer implies a program and a history of the conditional
program of what the Lord intends to fulfill in behalf of the audience and their
descendants and the certain prophetic portrayal of what the near and future history of the
people will be. The audience has the key, the final answer that the text does not register.
Although the prophetic portrayal of the text shows us what their answer in the future will
be. Therefore, textlinguistics has proved to be efficient in elucidating the way rhetoric,
structure and theology function in the text.
Adventist International Institute
of Advanced Studies
Theological Seminary
A DIVINE CALL TO RELATIONSHIP AND A COVENANTAL
RENEWAL IN DEUTERONOMY 28:69-30:20:
A SYNTAGMATIC, SYNTACTIC AND TEXT-
LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
A dissertation
presented in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
by
Emmer Chacon
October 2010
Copyright 2010
by Emmer Chacn
All rights reserved
A DIVINE CALL TO RELATIONSHIP AND A COVENANTAL RENEWAL
IN DEUTERONOMY 28:69-30:20: A SYNTAGMATIC, SYNTACTIC
AND TEXT-LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
A dissertation
presented in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
Doctor of Philosophy
by
Emmer Chacn
APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE:
_________________________________ ___________________________________
David Tasker, PhD, Chairman Carlos Mora, ThD, Member
Associate Professor of Old Testament Associate Professor of Old Testament
Exegesis and theology Biblical Languages
_________________________________ ___________________________________
Aecio Cairus, PhD, Member Kim Papaioannou, PhD, Internal Examiner
Professor of Systematic Theology Assistant Professor of New Testament
_________________________________ ___________________________________
Grenville Kent, PhD, External Examiner David Tasker, PhD, Dean
Wesley Institute, Sydney, Australia AIIAS Theological Seminary
___________________________________
Date Approved
Dedicated to Consuelo, my wife
:-- s -s :s
And to Maria, my mother
:s :: :
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. x
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. xii
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
Statement of the Problem ................................................................................ 4
Purpose and Significance of the Research ...................................................... 5
Justification of the Research ............................................................................ 7
Delimitation of the Research ........................................................................... 8
Methodology ................................................................................................... 9
Linguistic Analysis..................................................................................11
Microsyntactical Analysis .................................................................11
Word Order ...................................................................................... 12
Macrosyntactical Analysis ............................................................... 13
Verbal Distribution in the Text ......................................................... 14
Theological Analysis .............................................................................. 15
Literature Review .......................................................................................... 15
Recent Methodologies ........................................................................... 16
Historical and Literary Critical ........................................................ 16
Narrative Methodology .................................................................... 18
Synchronic-Canonical ...................................................................... 20
Rhetorical Critical ............................................................................ 22
Text-Linguistics ............................................................................... 27
Summary ................................................................................................ 29
2. TEXTLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS (PART I) ........................................................ 31
Syntagmatical and Syntactical Analysis of Deut 28:96-29:28 ...................... 32
Deuteronomy 28:69 ............................................................................... 33
Hebrew Text of Deut 28:69 .............................................................. 34
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................... 34
Summary .......................................................................................... 35
Clause Division of Deut 28:69 ......................................................... 35
Syntax and Syntagmatics ................................................................. 36
vi
Summary .......................................................................................... 41
Deuteronomy 29:1-8 .............................................................................. 42
Hebrew Text of Deut 29:1-8 ............................................................ 42
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................... 42
Summary .......................................................................................... 47
Clause Division of Deut 29:1-8 ....................................................... 47
Syntax and Syntagmatics ................................................................. 49
Summary .......................................................................................... 61
Deuteronomy 29:9-20 ............................................................................ 64
Hebrew ext of Deut 29:9-20 ............................................................ 64
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................... 65
Summary .......................................................................................... 73
Clause Division of Deut 29:9-20 ..................................................... 73
Syntax and Syntagmatics ................................................................. 75
Summary ........................................................................................ 103
Deuteronomy 29:21-28 ........................................................................ 105
Hebrew Text of Deut 29:21-28 ...................................................... 105
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................. 106
Summary ........................................................................................ 109
Clause Division of Deut 29:21-28 ................................................. 109
Syntax and Syntagmatics ................................................................110
Summary ........................................................................................ 123
Summary ..................................................................................................... 125
3. TEXTLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS (PART II) ..................................................... 126
Syntagmatical and Syntactical Analysis of Deut 30:1-20 ........................... 126
Deuteronomy 30:1-10 .......................................................................... 126
Hebrew Text of Deut 30:1-10 ........................................................ 126
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................. 127
Summary ........................................................................................ 131
Clause Division of Deut 30:1-10 ................................................... 131
Syntax and Syntagmatics ............................................................... 133
Summary ........................................................................................ 149
Deuteronomy 30:11-14 ........................................................................ 151
Hebrew Text of Deut 30:11-14 ...................................................... 151
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................. 151
Summary ........................................................................................ 153
Clause Division of Deut 30:11-14 ................................................. 153
Syntax and Syntagmatics ............................................................... 154
Summary ........................................................................................ 160
Deuteronomy 30:15-20. ....................................................................... 161
Hebrew Text of Deut 30:15-20 ...................................................... 161
Analysis of Textual Critical Notes ................................................. 162
Summary ........................................................................................ 169
Clause Division of Deut 30:15-20 ................................................. 170
Syntax and Syntagmatics ............................................................... 171
Summary ........................................................................................ 185
vii
Summary ..................................................................................................... 187
Textual Issues ....................................................................................... 187
Syntactic and Syntagmatic Analysis .................................................... 188
Structural Information .......................................................................... 188
Numeruswechsel and Personenwechsel ............................................... 190
4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF DEUT 28:69-30:20 ........................................ 192
The Structure of Deuteronomy .................................................................... 193
Covenant Form..................................................................................... 194
Concentric Literary Pattern .................................................................. 196
Collection of Speeches ......................................................................... 198
Summary .............................................................................................. 205
The Structure of Deuteronomy 28:69-30:20 ............................................... 206
Deuteronomy 28:69-29:8 ..................................................................... 207
Deuteronomy 29:9-20 .......................................................................... 212
Deuteronomy 29:21-28 ........................................................................ 216
Deuteronomy 30:1-10 .......................................................................... 219
Deuteronomy 30:11-14 ........................................................................ 223
Deuteronomy 30:15-20 ........................................................................ 225
Summary .............................................................................................. 228
5. COVENANT THEOLOGY AND DEUTERONOMY 28:69-30:20 .................. 232
Covenant Theology in the Pentateuch ......................................................... 232
Covenant Theology in Deut 28:69-30:20 .................................................... 238
Deuteronomy 28:69-29:8 ..................................................................... 239
Deuteronomy 29:9-20 .......................................................................... 244
Deuteronomy 29:21-28 ........................................................................ 247
Deuteronomy 30:1-10 .......................................................................... 250
Deuteronomy 30:11-14 ........................................................................ 253
Deuteronomy 30:15-20 ........................................................................ 255
Summary ..................................................................................................... 260
Gods Initiative..................................................................................... 261
Love of God and the Love for God ...................................................... 261
Order Is Important................................................................................ 262
Danger of Idolatry and Apostasy ......................................................... 262
Choices ................................................................................................. 263
Covenant Elements .............................................................................. 263
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................. 267
Summary ..................................................................................................... 267
Textual Critical Analysis ...................................................................... 267
Syntagmatic and Syntactical Analysis ................................................. 268
Structural Analysis ............................................................................... 269
Theological Analysis ............................................................................ 269
Conclusions ................................................................................................. 273
viii
Resumptive Repetition ......................................................................... 273
Numeruswechsel and Personenwechsel ............................................... 274
Location and Function of Deut 28:69 ................................................. 275
Covenant Features of the Text ............................................................. 275
Methodological Evaluation ......................................................................... 277
Recommendations for Further Study .......................................................... 279
Final Conclusion .......................................................................................... 281
APPENDIXES
A. VERBAL DISTRIBUTION IN DEUT 28:69-30:20 .......................................... 283
B. ANALYSIS OF SYNTAGMS AND CLAUSE IDENTIFICATION ................. 293
BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 325
ix
LIST OF TABLES
1. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 28:69 .................................................... 36
2. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 29:1-8 .................................................. 48
3. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 29:9-20 ................................................ 74
4. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 29:21-28 ............................................ 109
5. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 30:1-10 .............................................. 132
6. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 30:11-14 ............................................. 153
7. Clause Division and Translation of Deut 30:15-20 ............................................ 170
8. Parallels Between Deut 1:1-5, 4:44-49 and 28:69-29:8 ...................................... 208
9. Deut 29:1a-8d Internal Structure Flow ............................................................... 210
10. Literary Structure of Deut 30:11-14 ................................................................... 224
11. Literary Structure of Deut 30:15-20 ................................................................... 226
12. Literary Links Between Deut 4:25-31 and 30:1-20 ............................................ 227
13. General Structure of Deut 28:69-30:20 .............................................................. 229
x
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Asyndeton
1p First person plural
2mp Second person masculine plural
2ms Second person masculine singular
3p Third person
3ms Third person masculine singular
3mp Third person masculine plural
acc accusative
Adv Adverb/adverbial
ANE Ancient Near Eastern
BDB Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon
DO Direct object
DOTP Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch
IO Indirect object
LXX Septuagint
mo Modifier
MT Masoretic Text
NC Nominal clause
NIDB New Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible
NIDOTTE New International Dictionary of the Old Testament Theology and Exegesis
xi
nP Nominal predicate
OT Old Testament
P Predicate
Prep Preposition
TDOT Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament
WBC Word Biblical Commentary
xii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A PhD dissertation is always the result of many peoples labor. The education of
a PhD candidate does not start the moment he or she registers for the coursework. It
commences years back when academic discipline and critical thinking are planted and
then nurtured through time. Professor Eduardo Gmez hammered the ideal of academic
excellence in my mind back in 1983 during my first year in College.
Dr Laren Kurtz deposited the seed of this research back in 2003 during his class
on Pentateuch in Venezuela when he suggested literary methods as a promising exegetical
tool. Dr Clinton Whalen and Dr Gerald Klingbeil, my professors at AIIAS Theological
Seminary, took care in training me in Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic and exegesis providing
wide opportunity for me to explore diverse methodologies while writing several
academic papers that they carefully read and criticized. Wise feedback characterized this
process. Dr Joel Musvosvi and Dr Aecio Cairus, my PhD program directors, often went
the extra mile so that I could enjoy a research-oriented environment during all my
doctoral training. Dr Grenville Kent provided critical advice in the right moment. Dr
David Tasker, my main adviser, Dr Carlos Mora and Dr Kim Papaioannou have provided
guidance and advice.
Doctoral education demands enormous amounts of resources and implies heavy
stress. My sponsor institutions, the Seventh-day Theological Seminary of Venezuela, the
Seventh-day Adventist Venezuelan-Antillean Union and the Inter American Division
xiii
provided the needed material and moral support for my training so that I could focus on
advanced research with the basic needs of my family covered.
My friends and relatives have supported my family with their prayers and even
their resources during these years. Dr Micah Andrews has taken special attention during
all these years in providing me advice, guidance, academic resources and much more so
that my education might be balanced in the global and contemporary perspective. The
Leslie Hardinge Library has gone the extra mile helping me to find the much-needed
resources, books and articles in three continents across the sea and the ether.
My wife has been by my side for long years nurturing my scholarly dream,
pushing me ahead and unconditionally supporting me at an ineffable personal cost. Her
prayers, her character, her piety and her warm constant love have supported us through
fire and storms.
My Lord in heavens gave me a vision early in my faith journey and He has carried
me through. Glory be to Him in Heavens forever and ever. I pray that His grace might
empower me to bring glory to His Name.
1
Escuchad, cielos, y hablar;
Y oiga la tierra los dichos de mi boca.
2
Gotear como la lluvia mi enseanza;
Destilar como el roco mi razonamiento;
Como la llovizna sobre la grama,
Y como las gotas sobre la hierba;
3
Porque el nombre de Jehov proclamar.
Engrandeced a nuestro Dios.
4
l es la Roca, cuya obra es perfecta,
Porque todos sus caminos son rectitud;
Dios de verdad, y sin ninguna iniquidad en l;
Es justo y recto. Deut 32:1-4
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Deuteronomy has inspired and perplexed its readers for more than two millennia.
The overall covenantal form and theology coupled with its peculiar literary style both
amazes and bewilders the student of Deuteronomy. The style needs to be addressed in
order to unpack the former. The abundance of repetition and the presence of exceptions,
the often confusing flow of pronouns, the abundance of literary figures, and often unusual
vocabulary, grammar and/or syntax shroud the message of Deuteronomy. Textlinguistics
promises to provide a way to see through this fog. This methodology offers to the
interpreter an array of linguistic tools to assess the fabric of the text and reach its
message.
A review of recent scholarly publications reveals the literature on Deuteronomy as
massive and even overwhelming.
1
Some of the most representative methodological
approaches applied to the academic study of Deuteronomy and particularly to Deut
28:69-30:20 include perspectives such as historical-critical methodologies,
2
narrative
1
Duane Christensen, ed., A Song of Power and the Power of Song: Essays on the
Book of Deuteronomy, Sources for Biblical and Theological Study 3 (Winona Lake, IN:
Eisenbrauns, 1993), ix. See a comprehensive inventory of this bibliography up to 2000 in
Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 1-21:9, Word Biblical Commentary 6A (Dallas,
TX: Word Books, 2002), xxxv- liv.
2
Samuel Rolles Driver, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Deuteronomy
(Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1978), 320-328. Alexander Rof, The Covenant in the Land
of Moab (Deuteronomy 28:69-30:20): Historico-Literary, Comparative, and Formcritical
Considerations, in A Song of Power and the Power of Song: Essays on the Book of
2
criticism,
3
synchronic-canonical,
4
rhetorical-critical,
5
and text-linguistic.
6
However,
scholarly literature evidences that the textlinguistic approach has not been applied to Deut
28:69-30:20 to the best of my knowledge. These methodologies have contributed a rich
mine of scholarship and have brought to light a number of issues in Deuteronomy and in
the chosen text. These issues remain as a matter of study. A review of the scholarly
literature reveals that they remain either unsolved or partially solved. Some of these
subjects are pertinent to the study of Deut 28:69-30:20 and deal with areas such as the
literary structure of the passage. There is research needed in reference to the function of
Deut 28:69 as it is marked by the Masoretes as the ending of Deut 27:1-28:68 but its
vocabulary seems to be more related to 29:1-30:20.
7
The syntax and syntagmatics of the
passage need analysis in reference to the resumptive repetition (Wiederaufnahme)
8
that
Deuteronomy, ed. Duane L. Christensen, Sources for Biblical and Theological Study 3
(Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1993), 269-279.
3
John H. Sailhamer, The Pentateuch as Narrative (Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan, 1992), 471-473.
4
J. Gordon McConville, Deuteronomy, Apollos Old Testament Commentary 5
(Leicester, England: Apollos, 2002), 410-420. Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy
21:10-34:12, Word Biblical Commentary 6B (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2002),
706-733.
5
Timothy A. Lenchak, Choose Life! A Rhetorical-Critical Investigation of
Deuteronomy 28,69-30,20, Analecta Biblica 129 (Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto
Biblico, 1993).
6
Eep Talstra, Deuteronomy 9 and 10 Synchronic and Diachronic Observations,
in Synchronic or Diachronic? A Debate on Method in Old Testament Exegesis, ed.
Johannes C. De Moor (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 187-210. Jason Shane DeRouchie, A
Call to Covenant Love: Text Grammar and Literary Structure in Deuteronomy 5-11,
(PhD diss., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY: 2005).
7
This verse is marked with a petuah. Rof, The Covenant in the Land of
Moab, 269-270.
8
Wiederaufnahme or resumptive repetition is a discourse feature used to resume
a previous topic, story line or theme line that has been interrupted by a span of
information that is related to but diverges for a short or long gap before being resumed.
See Phil Quick, Resumptive RepetitionIntroduction to a Universal Discourse
Feature, Linguistika 14, no. 26 (2007): 1.
3
has been interpreted synchronically as literary device
9
and diachronically as evidence of
the editorial history of the text.
10
Another issue is the Numeruswechsel, which implies
changes in the morphological number of the addresses, and has been seen as evidence of
multiple editorial sources and as a rhetorical and even theological device.
11
The presence
and function of covenant forms in Deuteronomy are still a matter of study and Deut
28:69-30:20 shares those forms and theology.
12
In OT studies, recent scholarship has seen text-oriented methodologies taking
advantage of the state of the art in linguistic studies in general
13
and particularly in
biblical Hebrew linguistics.
14
These methodologies allow the interpreter to gain access to
9
See Denis T. Olson, Deuteronomy and the Death of Moses: A Theological
Reading (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1994), 129.
10
See Rof, The Covenant in the Land of Moab, 274-275.
11
See J. Gordon McConville, Singular Address in the Deuteronomic Law and
the Politics of Legal Administration, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 97
(2002): 19, 29-36.
12
See the discussion in James K. Hoffmeier, Ancient Israel in Sinai: The
Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2005), 193-192. John Charles Hutchison, The Relationship of the Abrahamic,
Mosaic, and Palestinian Covenants in Deuteronomy 29-30 (ThD diss., Dallas
Theological Seminary, 1981).
13
Grard Fernndez Smith, Fundamentos tericos, desarrollo y proyecciones
actuales de la lingstica del texto (PhD diss., Universidad de Cdiz, Cdiz, Espaa,
2003). This research in general linguistics shows several techniques and methodologies
currently used in reference to Hebrew linguistics.
14
Examples of the application of these text-oriented methodologies are found in
dissertations such as Rolf A. Jacobson, Many Are Saying: The Function of Direct
Discourse in the Hebrew Psalter (PhD diss., Princeton Theological Seminary, NJ, 2000).
Robert D. Holmstedt, The Relative Clause in Biblical Hebrew: A Linguistic Analysis
(PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2002). David O. Moomo, The Meaning
of the Biblical Hebrew Verbal Conjugation From a Crosslinguistic Perspective (PhD
diss., University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2004). Michael A. Lyons, From Law to
Prophecy: Ezekiels Use of the Holiness Code (PhD diss., University of Wisconsin,
Madison, 2005). Steven Edward Runge, A Discourse-Functional Description of
Participant Reference in Biblical Hebrew Narrative (PhD diss., University of
Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2006). Anne E. Garber Kompaor, Discourse Analysis of
Directive Text: The Case of Biblical Law (MA thesis, Associated Mennonite Biblical
4
a wealth of textual information that was not accessible before and might contribute to
solve issues related to the text, its structure and its theology. In addition these
methodologies offer to provide for the researcher interpretative controls because of its
linguistic foundation. It is in this context that textlinguistics
15
might contribute to the
solution of current issues related to the study of Deuteronomy and particularly Deut
28:69-30:20.
Statement of the Problem
This research aims to put the textlinguistic methodology to the test in a text where
it has not been applied so far, namely Deut 28:69-30:20. This research seeks to find what
textlinguistics might contribute to the solution of these issues in the selected text. These
issues include
Seminary, Elkhart, IN, 2004). Silvu Tatu, Ancient Hebrew and Ugaritic Poetry and
Modern Linguistic Tools: An Interdisciplinary Study, Journal for the Study of Religions
and Ideologies 17 (Summer, 2007): 47-68. Gernot Kopa, Divine Discourse and Biblical
Scholarship: A Limited Critical Assessment of Nicholas Wolterstorffs Speech-Act
Theory Approach and Its Implications for Biblical Hermeneutics and Exegetical
Methodology (MA thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 2008).
15
See an introduction to textlinguistics in David Allan Dawson, Text-Linguistics
and Biblical Hebrew (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994), 11-219. Christo van
der Merwe, A Critical Analysis of Narrative Syntactic Approaches, With Special
Attention to Their Relationship to Discourse Analysis, in Narrative Syntax and the
Hebrew Bible: Papers of the Tilburg Conference 1996, ed. Ellen van Wolde, Biblical
Interpretation Series 29 (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 133, 134, 156. Susan Anne Groom,
Linguistic Analysis of Biblical Hebrew (Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster, 2003), 131-160.
Some examples of recent research in OT studies using this methodology might be seen in
Baek Sung Choi, The Unity and the Symmetry of the Book of Job (PhD diss.,
University of Texas, Arlington, TX, 2000). Hwi Cho, Ezekiels Use of the Term sc:
With Reference to the Davidic Figure in His Restoration Oracles (PhD diss., Trinity
Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, IL, 2002). Renata C. Furst, Prophecy as
Narrative World: A Study of the World-Constructing Conventions and Narrative
Techniques in Hosea 1-3 (PhD diss., Universit de Montral, Canada, 2004). Otto
Snchez M., A Textlinguistic Analysis of Exodus 15:22-17:7 (PhD diss., Westminster
Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, PA, 2004). DeRouchie, A Call to Covenant Love.
Timothy Lee Walton, Experimenting With Qohelet: A Text-Linguistic Approach to
Reading Qohelet as Discourse (PhD diss., Vrije University, Amsterdam, 2006).
5
1. The nature, function and textual significance of resumptive repetition
(Wiederaufnahme).
2. The nature, function and textual significance of the repetitive changes in the
morphological number of the addresses (Numeruswechsel).
3. The identification and location of structural textual markers that have been
used to delimitate the speeches in Deuteronomy. This is important for the
purposes of the study as although Deut 28:69-30:20 is Moses last speech in
Deuteronomy it seems to begin with a text (28:69) which was marked by the
Masoretes with a petuHah as the ending of the previous speech. Therefore
there is an issue associated with the location and function of Deut 28:69 in
relation to the flow of the preceding (Deut 27:1-28:68) and the following text
(Deut 29:1-30:20). Does Deut 28:69 end Deut 27:1-28:68 or does it
introduce Deut 29:1-30:20 or does it fulfill both functions?
4. The nature and function of the covenant features of the text, both literary and
theological.
Purpose and Significance of the Research
Recent scholarship has applied linguistic advances
16
from general linguistics in
the study of biblical Hebrew linguistics in order to discover the kind of literary and
theological structures revealed by the syntax and text linguistic of the text itself.
17
In
16
Christo H. J. van der Merwe, Some Recent Trends in Biblical Hebrew
Linguistics: A Few Pointers Towards a More Comprehensive Model of Language Use,
Hebrew Studies 44 (2003): 7-24. This article samples contributions from structuralism,
pragmatics, cognitive linguistics and socio linguistics.
17
See Christo H. J. van der Merwe and Eep Talstra, Biblical Hebrew: The
Interface of Information Structure and Formal Features, Zeitschrift fur Althebraistik 15-
16 (2002-2003): 68-107.
6
harmony with this, the purpose of this study is to explore the syntax of Deut 28:69-30:20
at both the clause and the supra clause level.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the syntax, text-linguistic and structural
elements of the selected text in order to arrive at possible solutions to the issues in Deut
28:69-30:20 using its own language. This approach attempts to avoid the usage of
categories that might result external to the text. Instead of using classical Greek, Latin or
contemporary categories,
18
it will look inside the text in order to identify its own
linguistic elements. In other words, this study seeks to analyze the data from the
perspective of the semantic, syntactic, syntagmatic and pragmalinguistic features of the
text
19
so that this information might illuminate the understanding of the text. This
approach seeks to keep the locus of the interpretative authority on the text seeking to
limit the subjectivity of the interpreter in the search for objectivity. Then this study
moves from the linguistic data derived from the analysis of the text to its rhetoric,
structure and theology.
18
Timothy A. Lenchak applied Greek rhetoric to the study of Deut 28:69-30:20.
This approach has received criticism. See Lenchak, Choose Life! Steve McKenzie,
review of Choose Life! A Rhetorical-Critical Investigation of Deuteronomy 28,69-
30,20, by Timothy A. Lenchak, Journal of Biblical Literature 114, no. 2 (Summer
1995): 301.
19
This study differentiates syntax and syntagmatics as the first being the analysis
of the functional relations between words in a text in order to form phrases, clauses and
sentences. Syntagmatics analyzes the functional relations between words that combine
to form a linear linguistic sequence called syntagm. See Groom, Linguistic Analysis of
Biblical Hebrew, 105-106. It is important to recognize that textlinguistics is a
methodological trend still in process of development and eclectic therefore some
concepts might still require further delimitation or clarification.
Pragmalinguistics (as used in this research) refers to the conventions according
to which speakers belonging to a particular culture do various things in particular ways
with language. Christo H. J. van der Merwe, Jackie A. Naud, and Jan H. Kroeze, A
Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar. Biblical Languages: Hebrew 3 (Sheffield:
Sheffield Academic Press, 1999), 52. Ida Zatelli, Pragmalinguistics and Speech-Act
Theory as Applied to Classical Hebrew, Zeitschrift fr Althebraistik 6 (1993): 60.
7
Justification of the Research
Scholars that apply literary methods to the study of the Hebrew biblical text have
recently been using linguistic tools to their exegetical endeavor.
20
This methodological
tendency provides an opportunity for a fresh reading of the text and a better evaluation of
its literary aspects and its theology. This reading from a fresh perspective promises
access to a wealth of linguistic data that might enrich our understanding of the biblical
text, as recent research shows.
21
The study of Deuteronomy has also begun to benefit
from this linguistic approach.
22
This research seeks to take advantage of this situation
and use textlinguistic tools to study the text of Deut 28:69-30:20 and then find how this
methodology might help to solve its textual, structural and theological issues.
20
See examples in Hans Rechenmacher and Christo H. J. van der Merwe, The
Contribution of Wolfgang Richter to Current Developments in the Study of Biblical
Hebrew, Journal of Semitic Studies 50, no. 1 (2005): 80. See additionally Christo van
der Merwe, Discourse Linguistic and Biblical Hebrew Grammar in Biblical Hebrew
and Discourse Linguistics, ed. Robert D. Bergen (Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of
Linguistics, 1994), 13-49; Robert E. Longacre, Weqatal Forms in Biblical Hebrew
Prose, in Biblical Hebrew and Discourse Linguistics, ed. Robert D. Bergen (Dallas,
TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1994), 50-98; Francis I. Andersen, Salience,
Implicature, Ambiguity, and Redundancy in Clause-Clause Relationships in Biblical
Hebrew, in Biblical Hebrew and Discourse Linguistics, ed. Robert D. Bergen (Dallas,
TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1994), 99-116; Alviero Niccacci, On the Hebrew
Verbal System, in Biblical Hebrew and Discourse Linguistics, ed. Robert D. Bergen
(Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1994), 117-137.
21
See some linguistic approaches applied in Old Testament studies in Kent Aaron
Reynolds, Psalm 119: Promoting Torah, Portraying an Ideal Student of the Torah (PhD
diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2007), 19-65. Kent Aaron Reynolds discusses
the relationship between form and function in poetry. A more technical example is found
in Keith Andrew Massey, The Concord of Collective Nouns and Verbs in Biblical
Hebrew: A Controlled Study (PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1998).
Michael A. Lyons used linguistic tools to provide evidence of Ezekiel as a reader and
user of an earlier text as scripture. See Lyons, From Law to Prophecy, 194. See
another linguistic approach in Martin Prbstle, Truth and Terror: A Text-Oriented
Analysis of Daniel 8:9-14 (PhD diss., Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI, 2006).
22
Talstra, Deuteronomy 9 and 10, 187-210. DeRouchie, A Call to Covenant
Love.
8
Delimitation of the Research
This study deals with a large section of the Hebrew text, namely, Deut 28:69-
30:20. Therefore, issues such as the literary provenance, date of composition and other
isagogic issues of Deuteronomy are not addressed.
23
Textual and morphological issues
are analyzed only as required by the study itself. This study will not address instances of
intertextuality. At the same time, structural aspects will come into focus only as required
by the syntactical and linguistic data provided by the text itself in the context of the
structural approach that will be selected in the literature review. The theological analysis
will be limited to the covenant-related data provided by the text.
23
The issue related to the unity and authorship of the book of Deuteronomy and
the whole Pentateuch is still under discussion and probably far from solution. We may
see in some scholars a tendency to approach the Pentateuch both as a unity and as a
collection. Some examples in this approach are U. Cassuto, The Documentary
Hypothesis and the Composition of the Pentateuch (Jerusalem: Hebrew University,
1961), 98-105, especially page 103, where he speaks of the unity of the Torah and the
variety of its materials. M. H. Segal, The Pentateuch: Its Composition and Its
Authorship and Other Biblical Studies (Jerusalem: Hebrew University, 1967), 1-21.
M. H. Segal arrives to the conclusion that the Pentateuch must be the work or final
work of an author or compiler who worked on a definite plan with a fixed purpose on
view, 21. Thomas W. Mann, The Book of the Torah: The Narrative Integrity of the
Pentateuch (Atlanta: John Knox, 1988), 1-9, 143-147. Tomas W. Mann stresses this
twofold approach to the literary unity and the multiplicity of sources and traditions.
McConville, Deuteronomy, 38-51, see especially page 51 where J. Gordon McConville
briefly delineates his methodology and page 39 where he emphasizes evidence of
similarities between Deuteronomy and the Hittite treaty form, echoes in treaties and law
codes and even in its language as reflecting the world of the second millennium BC. Jan
Ridderbos, Deuteronomy, Bible Students Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Regency,
1984), 6-24, see especially pages 19-22 for a Mosaic approach. See Sailhamer, The
Pentateuch as Narrative, 1-80 where Sailhamer addresses the whole Pentateuch as a
narrative unity and stresses the literary devices that evidences this unity. See Olson,
Deuteronomy and the Death of Moses, 1-5; in these pages Denis T. Olson explains his
methodology as literary and theological reading and in pages 6-22 he introduces both the
literary and theological devices he will use in his reading of Deuteronomy. Olson accepts
a long editorial history for the book but he approaches it as a whole. For a brief
evaluation of the vocabulary comparison between Ugarit and Deuteronomy, see Peter C.
Craigie, Deuteronomy and the Ugaritic Studies, in A Song of Power and the Power of
Song: Essays on the Book of Deuteronomy, ed. Duane L. Christensen, Sources for
Biblical and Theological Study 3 (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1993), 115-121.
9
Methodology
The study will analyze the text of Deut 28:69-30:20 focusing upon two aspects:
Text linguistics and theology. It is expected that the textlinguistic analysis will provide
information with structural implications in order to clarify issues such as the structural
function of Deut 28:69, the nature and function of resumptive repetition,
Numeruswechsel and the covenantal elements in the text. These aspects of the study will
be performed with the intention of always allowing the text to be the locus of authority
for its interpretation. This in an effort to use it as a hermeneutical control in the search of
the elusive objectivity.
In the stage of the syntactic and syntagmatic analysis this study adopts the present
form of the Hebrew text of Deut 28:69-30:20 in its Masoretic textual tradition.
24
In
addition to this textual witness, it will make use of the pertinent available textual data
25
24
In the textual critical field, this study is benefited from the recent publication of
Carmel McCarthy, ed., Biblia Hebraica Quinta, Fascicle 5: Deuteronomy (Stuttgart:
Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2007). This publication contains two books in one. One
section contains the Hebrew text of Deuteronomy and the critical apparatus (pages I-
XXXII, 1-104). The other section of the book provides a general introduction and the
discussion of both the Masorah Parva and Magna and the analysis of the main textual
issues (pages 1*-190*). It considers and analyzes the evidence from all the available
resources in Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Syriac and Aramaic, see pages 5*-9*. For a review of
the textual methodology of the Biblia Hebraica Quinta, see Gerald Klingbeil, review of
Biblia Hebraica Quinta. Fascicle 18: General Introduction and Megilloth, by Adrian
Shenker, J. De Waard, P. B. Dirksen, Y. A. P. Goldman, R. Shfer, and M. Sb,
Journal of Asia Adventist Seminary 10, no. 2 (2007): 216-219. Some other publications
that will provide useful information in textual issues related to the text of Deuteronomy
are Sidnie White Crawford, Textual Criticism of the Book of Deuteronomy and the
Oxford Hebrew Bible Project, in Seeking out the Wisdom of the Ancients: Essays in
Honor of Michael V. Fox on Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. Ronald L. Troxel,
Kelvin G. Friebel, and Dennis R. Magary (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2005), 315-
326. Robert G. Bratcher and Howard Hatton, A Handbook on Deuteronomy, UBS
Handbook series (New York: United Bible Societies, 2000).
25
In reference to protocols and procedures for textual criticism in the Old
Testament, see Emanuel Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, 2
nd
ed.
(Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001), 287-312, 351-370.
10
from the Septuagint,
26
Qumran,
27
the Samaritan Pentateuch
28
and the Vulgate
29
as it
might be relevant for the study. Some of these textual variants does not necesarilly
reflect or suggest a different reading in the Hebrew text behind the manuscripts and
translations but might reflect translation strategies
30
or even scribal habits.
31
It is
important to recognize here that this textual critical discussion departs from the linguistic
methodology intended by this study. However, it is followed as even those differences
probably due to translation strategies or scribe improvement provide information about
the way the text might have been understood by ancient scribes and translators. Ancient
26
John William Wevers has published a wealth of scholarly reference works
related to the study of the Greek text of Deuteronomy. See John William Wevers,
Deuteronomium, Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum
Gottingensis editum 3, 2
nd
ed. (Gttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2006), 315-332.
John William Wevers, Notes on the Greek Text of Deuteronomy, Society of Bible
Literature Septuagint and Cognates Studies Series (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1995),
461-489. John William Wevers, The LXX Translator of Deuteronomy, in IX Congress
of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, Cambridge 1995,
ed. Bernard A. Taylor (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997), 57-89. John William
Wevers, Text History of the Greek of Deuteronomy (Gttingen: Vandenhoeck and
Ruprecht, 1978).
27
Although Carmel McCarthy has dealt with the Qumran textual data related to
Deuteronomy, the analysis will consult Ryan N. Roberts, Textual Variants in the
Deuteronomy Dead Sea Scrolls: A Case for Standardization (MA thesis, Trinity Western
University, Langley, Canada, 2005).
28
See in reference to this aspect August Freiherrn von Gall, ed., Der Hebrische
Pentateuch der Samaritaner (1914-1918; repr. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993), 423-
426.
29
R. Weber, B. Fischer, J. Gribomont, H. F. D. Sparks, and W. Thiele, ed.,
Biblia Sacra Iuxta Vulgatam Versionem (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1983),
30
In reference to the translation strategies of the LXX in Deuteronomy see Anneli
Aejmelaeus, On the Trial of the Septuagint Translators: Collected Essays (Kampen:
Netherlands: Kok Pharos, 1993), 65-115. Wevers, The LXX Translator of
Deuteronomy, 59-89. Karen H. Jobes and Moiss Silva, Invitation to the Septuagint
(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2000), 151-158. McCarthy, Deuteronomy, 6*-9*.
Roberts, Textual Variants in the Deuteronomy Dead Sea Scrolls, 112.
31
In reference to the scribal habits reflected in the Hebrew manuscripts of
Deuteronomy in Qumran, see Roberts, Textual Variants in the Deuteronomy Dead Sea
Scrolls, 112.
11
scribes and translators had to understad the text in order to copy and translate it. The
syntagmatic and syntactical analysis might take advantage of this information.
Linguistic Analysis
Microsyntactical analysis. Due to the linguistic nature of this study, the
methodology is eclectic as will become evident. The following are the steps of the
linguistic analysis.
In this step of the analysis, the text will be broken down into clauses consisting of
the smallest syntactical unit with a complete sense. Once this has been achieved, the
study will proceed first to the syntactical and syntagmatic analysis of every single
syntagm inside every clause, from the very first to the last in the Hebrew text of Deut
28:69-30:20. The syntagmatic analysis at this level will provide the necessary
information in order to identify and confirm the boundaries of every clause as well as the
internal word order and the verbal distribution. L. J. Regt elaborated a syntactic
inventory of the text of Deut 1-30 that might be useful for the purposes of this study.
Regt does not provide the linguistic database he used in his dissertation and therefore his
methodology is difficult to follow and to evaluate.
32
The microsyntactical analysis will also identify the verbal and nominal clauses as
well as clarify and exhaust elements related to the coordination and subordination of the
clauses. This initial clause classification will lead to the adequate procedures for clause
analysis.
33
This information will be used to inform the flow of the utterances and, as a
32
See L. J. Regt, A Parametric Model for Syntactic Studies of a Textual Corpus:
Demonstrated on the Hebrew of Deuteronomy 1-30 (Maastricht, Netherlands: Van
Gorcum, 1988), 9-112.
33
Duane A. Garrett and Jason S. DeRoouchie A Modern Grammar for Classical
Hebrew, 2
nd
ed. (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman, 2009), 1-14; Bill T. Arnold and
12
result, the rhetoric intention of the text as well as its structure. This information will
allow the identification of the main line of the text or foreground and the background or
supportive textual material.
34
This information will make it possible to identify
discourse types according to the way in which the agent and the verbal temporal
succession interact. This expression refers to small sections in the text that can be
distinguished from its immediate context due to the way in which agent and verbal
aspects interact.
35
The temporal succession will be determined from the analysis of
verbal temporal aspects and verbal distribution. This microsyntactical analysis will
provide data that will inform the structural analysis in Chapter 4 and theological analysis
in Chapter 5.
Word order. The information derived from the syntactic and syntagmatic
analysis of the clauses will bring into focus the word order. This aspect has to do with
the presence (or absence) and the position of the verb and other syntagms in the clause.
36
Additionally, the analysis of the presence, position and usage of prepositions and special
particles is important.
37
Prepositions and special particles will be used in identifying the
limits of the clauses and their flow and recognizing rhetorical nuances.
38
Information so
John H. Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003), 162-170; Cynthia L. Miller, ed. The Verbless Clause in Biblical Hebrew:
Linguistic Approaches (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1999), 79-248, 297-336.
34
Groom, Linguistic Analysis of Biblical Hebrew, 146-151.
35
See van der Merwe, A Critical Analysis of Narrative Syntactical Approaches,
133-156; Luis Vegas Montaner, Sintaxis del verbo Hebreo bblico, in Jewish Studies at
the Turn of the Twentieth Century: Proceedings of the 6th EAJS Congress Toledo, July
1988, ed. Judit Targarona Borrs and Angel Senz-Badillos, Biblical, Rabbinical, and
Medieval Studies 1 (Leiden: Brill, 1999), 221-231.
36
Katsuomi Shimasaki, Focus Structure in Biblical Hebrew: A Study of Word
Order and Information Structure (Bethesda, MD: CDL Press, 2002).
37
Garrett and DeRoouchie, A Modern Grammar, 19-26.
38
Arnold and Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax, 95-161.
13
obtained in the biblical text, may provide a link between the syntagmatic and syntactical
form and the theology portrayed by the text.
The unmarked word order of the Hebrew verbal clause is VSO (Verb-Subject-
Object) or even VSX (Verb-Subject-any other part of the speech).
39
The unmarked order
in the case of nominal clauses is subject plus predicate (Subject-Predicate). Any variation
of these patterns that is not required by syntax provides a window to identify nuances in
the clause. Whenever any other syntagm is located ahead of the the slot reserved for the
verb (the pre-verbal slot), it is said that this syntagm is fronted.
40
This fronted syntagm
might be the focus of the clause or it might have been brought in frontal position for
emphasis, comparison or even contrast.
41
Macrosyntactical analysis. As the micro syntactical analysis is exhausted, then
the study moves upwards to the inter clause syntax
42
in the subsections of the passage and
finally to the syntax of the whole passage. This assessment will make evident the
position of every clause in reference to the flow of the text.
43
The information thus
provided leads to the identification of internal sections in the text according to different
discourse types as already mentioned. These discourse sections of the text will be
analyzed internally and in their relationship with the preceding and subsequent text
44
as
well as with the whole passage. This will provide information for the structural analysis
of the passage.
39
See van der Merwe, Naud and Kroeze, A Biblical Hebrew Reference
Grammar, 63.
40
Ibid., 333-344.
41
For further details, see van der Merwe and Talstra, Biblical Hebrew, 68-107.
42
Arnold and Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax, 171-192.
43
Ibid., 171-192.
44
Garrett and DeRoouchie, A Modern Grammar, 9-11.
14
As the syntactical analysis advances from the syntagm to the clause and from the
clause to the supra-clause-level syntax, this study will benefit from the information thus
obtained. Supra-clause-level syntax will provide the information needed to move the
study to the syntactical analysis of the whole passage.
Once the identification of the clauses is done, they are given letters according to
their order (
a
) and their limits are indicated (/). This procedure, once applied to the text,
provides the nomenclature used in this study to facilitate the localization of the
syntactical elements and other features in the text.
45
This will facilitate the task for the
reader. This approach to the structure of the text departs from Christensens approach
that focuses on the counting of the accents and mora
46
in a search for musical indicators
in the text. Christensens approach has been the object of criticism from a text linguistic
perspective.
47
Verbal distribution in the text. Syntactical analysis will include the analysis of
the verbal distribution and their flow.
48
The verbal distribution has to do with the
presence and position of the verbs inside the clauses and their relation to subjects and
objects. The verbal flow has to do with their temporal-succession aspect.
49
This analysis
will provide linguistic and textual evidence to identify and verify the nature of individual
45
Deut 29:1a, meaning Deuteronomy chapter 29, verse one and clause one.
46
Mora, plural morae or moras, is a phonetic unit for the determination and
counting of the syllable weight.
47
See Jason S. DeRouchie, Deuteronomy as Didactic Poetry? A Critique of D.
L. Christensens View, Journal of Asia Adventist Seminary 10, no. 1 (2007): 1-13.
48
Vegas Montaner, Sintaxis del verbo Hebreo bblico, 221-231; Bruce K.
Waltke and M. OConnor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Winona Lake, IN:
Eisenbrauns, 1990), 455-631; Arnold and Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax, 83-
94. R. E. Longacre, Discourse Perspective on the Hebrew Verb: Affirmation and
Restatement, in Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew, ed. Walter Ray Bodine (Winona Lake,
IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 177-190.
49
Garrett and DeRoouchie, A Modern Grammar, 15-18.
15
sub-units of the discourse inside the text. Recent scholarship provides tools for this kind
of analysis of verbal distribution and flow.
Theological Analysis
This study focuses on the information that the linguistic data may provide for the
understanding of the covenantal theology of Deut 28:69-30:20. The previous stages of
the study will inform the theological analysis, which will be limited to those covenant
topics or aspects reflected in the vocabulary and the rhetorical intention of the text as
exhibited by textlinguistic analysis. The application of linguistic pragmatics to the study
of biblical Hebrew language in reference to the word order might prove useful in this
endeavor. It provides, from a text-linguistic perspective procedures to determine theme,
topic and focus of a text.
50
Finally, after the theological analysis is concluded, the study will elaborate
appropriate summary and conclusions on the different stages of the study. Special
attention will be given to methodological aspects. The theology of the text will also be in
focus. These conclusions will be drawn from partial summaries and conclusions
elaborated at the end of each chapter.
Literature Review
This section surveys the literature related to relevant topics that are critical for the
objectives of this study. First, this review will evaluate a sample of the methodologies
recently applied to the study of Deuteronomy and specifically to Deut 28:69-30:20, with
50
van der Merwe and Talstra, Biblical Hebrew, 68-107; Vegas Montaner,
Sintaxis del verbo Hebreo bblico, 221-231. For an extensive treatment of pragmatics
as applied to biblical Hebrew syntax see Sebastiaan Jonathan Floor, From Information
Structure, Topic and Focus, to Theme in Biblical Hebrew Narrative (PhD diss.,
University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2004).
16
the purpose of identifying their contributions and challenges that might be pertinent to the
study of Deut 28:69-30:20. Second, the review will evaluate a sample of different
approaches to the study of the literary structure of Deuteronomy in order to choose one of
them as structural framework for this study. This assessment will provide a context to
evaluate the linguistic data provided by this study that might have structural implications.
Third, as OT covenant literature is vast and the concept is complex, this review will
evaluate a selection of topics that might be relevant to the study of the covenant theology
as portrayed in Deut 28:69-30:20. These topics, once reviewed, will provide a sample of
the state of the contemporary issues related to the scope of the study and a background
against which might be evaluated the data obtained from the syntactic and syntagmatic
analysis in this study.
Recent Methodologies
This section surveys and evaluates some of the methodologies that have been
applied for the study of the book of Deuteronomy. The methodologies to be sampled are
historical and literary critical, narrative, synchronical-canonical and text-linguistics.
These methodologies have been selected as the most representative in the available
literature.
Historical and literary critical. Historical critical and literary critical
methodologies assume that the current Hebrew text of Deuteronomy has a long editorial
history behind it. In harmony with this perspective, the book of Deuteronomy represents
a strategy to reinforce a politico-religious situation.
51
These methodologies insists in
considering the textual and literary peculiarities of the text as evidence of this suggested
51
Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Winona Lake,
IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 1-9, 158-171.
17
long editorial history. That is the case of the repetitions
52
and particularly resumptive
repetitions or Wiederaufnahme,
53
as in Deut 29:19b-20.
Changes in the morphology of the pronouns, Numeruswechsel, where the object
of the addressees change from third masculine plural to second masculine singular, are
part of the data interpreted as evidence of the editorial history. In Deut 28:69-30:20, Deut
29 addresses the people mainly in plural but there are singular forms in texts as 29:2
(:r s :s) and particularly verse 4 where the people are addressed in plural (:::r:
::-::c ::s:) and the text moves into singular (:. :r: -::s: :r:). Finally,
Deut 29:10 addresses the people in second masculine plural (:::: ::e:) and then shifts
(:: :s: r sr ::~: : ~ : : : :s .) to second masculine singular up to
the end of the verse. Deuteronomy 30:1-10 addresses the whole people in second
masculine singular. This morphological peculiarity in the book of Deuteronomy has been
interpreted as representing evidence of the styles of diverse sources underlying the book
of Deuteronomy.
54
Another aspect emphasized by critical methods on Deut 28:69-30:20 deals with
the presence of the covenant form in this chapter and its context. Literary dependence on
the first millennium Neo-Assyrian treaty literature is seen in the vocabulary and forms of
this chapter as parallels are traced between them.
55
52
On repetition as literary technique in biblical narrative, see Robert Alter, The
Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 88-113. Robert Alter, The
World of Biblical Literature (New York: Basic Books, 1992), 35-40, 72-75.
53
See an example of the arguments in Rof, The Covenant in the Land of
Moab, 274-275.
54
McConville, Singular Address in the Deuteronomic Law, 19.
55
Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School, 114-146, contrary to
this, Rof sees the Hittite vassal treatises of the second millennium as the literary
18
Historical and literary critical methods face some problems as a result of their
analysis of Deut 28:69-30:20. Both have difficulties, first to delineate with precision the
boundaries of the different sources in the text, and second to identify the Sitz im Leben of
each source.
56
However, these critical methods have identified some strategies in the text
that provide a picture of the theology of this chapter. From this perspective, Deut 29 first
makes a review of YHWHs historical actions on behalf of the people (verses 1-8), and
then makes clear to the people that they are assembled to enter in a covenant with YHWH
(verses 9-14). They are further warned about the consequences of falling into idolatry,
including the final ruin and the exile (Deut 29:9-28 and 30:1-10).
57
Narrative methodology. Narrative methodology prefers to approach the text in
its final form and then analyzes Deut 28:69-30:20 in the light of an overall literary
structure running through the Pentateuch. In this sense, the Pentateuch is seen as a book
in five volumes. According to this approach, the Pentateuch is organized in such a way
that after a major narrative there is a poetic section and then a historic epilogue.
58
In this
way at the end of the patriarchal narrative, there is a poetic section (Gen 49:1-27). The
background of the treatise form in Deut 29-30. Rof, The Covenant in the Land of
Moab, 279. See also C. Brekelmans, Wisdom Influence in Deuteronomy, in A Song
of Power and the Power of Song: Essays on the Book of Deuteronomy, ed. Duane L.
Christensen, Sources for Biblical and Theological Study 3 (Winona Lake, IN:
Eisenbrauns, 1993), 127-131.
56
Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School, 8. This work
approaches literary strategies from a diachronical perspective.
57
Driver, Deuteronomy, 320.
58
Sailhamer, The Pentateuch as Narrative, 1-3, 35-37, 423-479. Martin G.
Klingbeil, Poemas en medio de la prosa: Poesa insertada en el Pentateuco, in Inicios,
paradigmas y fundamentos: Estudios teolgicos y exegticos en el Pentateuco, River
Plate Adventist University Monograph Series in Biblical and Theological Studies 1, ed.
Gerald A. Klingbeil (Entre Ros, Argentina: Editorial Universidad Adventista del Plata,
2004), 61-85.
19
other poetic sections are after the Exodus narrative (Exod 15:1-21), at the middle of the
wilderness narrative (Num 23:7-10, 18-24; 24:3-9, 16-24) and at the end of it (Deut 32:1-
43; 33:2-29). Each one of these poetic sections in turn is followed by their respective
historic epilogue (Gen 50; Exod 15:22-27; Num 25 and Deut 34). In this plot, there is a
call with an imperative verb (Deut 31:28, :, see Gen 49:1; Num 24:14). There is a
proclamation with a cohortative verb (Deut 31:28, rs, see Gen 49:1; Num 24:14) and
then a prediction about what will happen to the people at the end of the days (Deut
31:29, :: -~s:, see Gen 49:1; Num 24:14) featuring the presence of the king figure
(::, Deut 33:5a, see Gen 49:20; Exod 15:18; Num 24:7).
59
The expression ::
-~s: gives an eschatological dimension to these poems.
60
This literary structure of the
text serves the theological purpose of setting a future program for the people. The text
looks backward to the previous history of the people and highlights Gods guidance,
protection and provisions on their behalf. The text also looks forward to what is
portrayed as the ideal future of the people living in harmonious fidelity to YHWH. At the
same time, the real future History of infidelity, apostasy and idolatry is revealed.
61
Additionally, the stories of the past serve as a type of the future events and even model
them.
62
The narrative approach sees the text in reference to three historical contexts: The
context of the portrayed event, the context of the writer, and the context of the intended
59
Sailhamer, The Pentateuch as Narrative, 35-37.
60
See Richard M. Davidson, The Eschatological Literary Structure of the Old
Testament, in Creation, Life and Hope: Essays in Honor of Jacques Doukhan, ed. J.
Moskala (Berrien Springs, MI: Old Testament Department, Seventh-day Adventist
Theological Seminary, Andrews University, 2000), 351.
61
Ibid., 472.
62
Ibid., 37-44.
20
reader.
63
It may be said that narrative methods answers to the critical fractioning of the
text by giving evidence of unified literary micro and macrostructures in the whole
Pentateuch and, in our specific case, in Deuteronomy. In addition, this methodology has
enunciated and revealed the theological function and the programmatic nature of these
literary structures. The application of the narrative methodology has produced fruitful
results in its approach to the Pentateuch and Deuteronomy although issues such as the
Wiederaufnahme and the Numeruswechsel have not been specifically addressed to the
best of my knowledge.
Synchronic-canonical. The synchronic-canonical approach to Deut 28:69-30:20
deals with the theology of the text as well as with its syntax and literary strategies. In this
regard, the methodology and format of the Word Biblical Commentary have exerted an
influence. This format includes a careful and comprehensive review of the available
primary and secondary literature. It relies upon a direct translation of the Hebrew text
with attention to textual, formal, structural, syntactical and literary issues of the passage.
It then follows a verse-by-verse commentary of what the text meant and finally provides
a brief explanation of the contemporary meaning of the text.
The issue of the Wiederaufnahme
64
has been answered with the identification of
the presence of a synoptic/resumptive-expansive literary technique. Accordingly, this
technique allows the biblical writer to tell the story twice. In the second account, he
expands on it and may even use another point of view.
65
63
Ibid., 1-11.
64
See William Robert Higgs, A Stylistic Analysis of the Numeruswechsel
Sections of Deuteronomy (PhD diss., The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary,
Louisville, KY, 1982), 2-9.
65
Joe M. Sprinkle, The Book of the Covenant: A Literary Approach, Journal
for the Study of the Old Testament Supplemental Series 174 (Sheffield: JSOT Press,
21
An alternative explanation of the Numeruswechsel has been proposed by
identifying a legal and rhetorical strategy. According to J. Gordon McConville, this
strategy lays the responsibility of the administration of law on the people (plural) and
then on the individual (singular) rather than on the king.
66
Additionally, these changes of
number in the morphology of Deut 28:69-30:20, that are not limited to the second person
in Deut 29 but also include the first person, are seen as a literary and rhetorical strategy.
As an example, Christensen uses these shifts in number as one of his tools to identify
literary structures in the text.
67
The synchronic-canonical approach to Deuteronomy in addressing the issue of the
presence of the treaty form in Deut 28:69-30:20 (and in the book as a whole), has found
more consistent parallels with the second millennium Hittite vassal treaties rather than
with the first millennium neo-Assyrian treaty literature.
68
Synchronic canonical methods seek to answer to critical claims by uncovering
deep, detailed and extensive literary structures in the book of Deuteronomy and by
refining the arguments related to the parallelisms with the Ancient Near Eastern (ANE)
treaty literature. Additionally, theological and strategic functions for these structures
have been suggested. This approach has tried to be comprehensive in its treatment of the
text, its contexts and the primary and secondary available literature dealing with it.
However, textlinguistic approach may contribute to the understanding of these issues
with a more detailed analysis of the text.
1994), 19; Burke O. Long detects and describes literary and spatiotemporal structures
related to resumptive repetition. See Burke O. Long, Framing Repetitions in Biblical
Historiography, Journal of Biblical Literature 106, no. 3 (September 1987): 385-389.
66
McConville, Singular Address in the Deuteronomic Law, 29-36.
67
Christensen, Deuteronomy 21:10-34:12, 709.
68
McConville, Deuteronomy, 23, 24, 37, 39-40.
22
Rhetorical critical. Recent rhetorical critical studies show mixed results.
Timothy A. Lenchack applies Greek-Latin, rhetorical criteria and categories to the
analysis of Deut 28:69-30:20.
69
This study has found that the audience is the whole
nation of Israel and the speech is based upon the character, ethos, of Moses and contains
emotional, pathos, and rational, logos, elements. It aims to demonstrate that idol worship
is incompatible with the worship of YHWH and that infidelity to this covenant will bring
punishment while its observance will bring reward; the people must choose between
YHWH and other gods. It is important to recognize that Lenchack pays careful attention
to the micro and macro syntactical structures in the text
70
but doubts may remain about
the extent to which the features of classical rhetoric are actually inherent in biblical
material.
71
We find some early attempts where attention is directed to rhetorical studies in
Deuteronomy that are more oriented to the text. In the sixties, some studies focused on
literary strategies as locating in the text key-words, motifs, speaker distribution, and
concentric inclusions.
72
In his literary study of Deut 1-28 Jack R. Lundbom found
framing literary devices, which he identifies through textual markers.
73
These are
keywords, which are repeated in such a way that form literary structures. He also found
that these literary structures fulfill rhetorical purposes.
69
See Lenchak, Choose Life!
70
Ibid., 173-179, 221-232.
71
S. McKenzie, review of Choose Life! 301.
72
See Jack R. Lundbom, The Inclusio and Other Framing Devices in
Deuteronomy I-XXVIII, Vetus Testamentum 46, no. 3 (July 1996): 298. This study does
not share Lundboms conclusions about Deut 29-34 as a latter addendum to a first edition
of the book of Deuteronomy. As already noted, narrative studies have made evident the
presence of literary macro structures in the Pentateuch and in Deuteronomy that suggest
the literary integrity of the book of Deuteronomy.
73
Ibid., 296-315.
23
Lundbom identifies Deut 1:1-5 as an inverted inclusio in itself that also introduces
the following section, which runs from 1:6 to 4:49, while 4:44-49 is an inverted inclusio
with Deut 1:1-5. He identifies Deut 1:6-3:29 as a summary of the wilderness wandering
while he sees 4:1-40 as a sermon on what lies ahead for Israel.
74
This finding supports
the location of Deut 4:44-49 in the structure of the text and not just as an appendix to it.
In this way the literary and the rhetorical function of Deut 4:44-49 is made evident. Next,
Lundbom proceeds to identify similar framing structures in Deut 5-11. First, he finds an
inclusio consisting of Deut 5:1 and 11:32
75
since both of them use the terms the statutes
and ordinances, be careful to do and today. The second inclusio includes Deut 6:6-9
and 11:18-20 and a third one consists of 6:3 and 11:22.
Lundbom identifies several other framing structures in Deut 12-26.
76
One of
these structures dealing with Deut 12 are verses 1 and 32 which form an inclusio with the
usage of -cr: ::- in Deut 12:1 and -cr: ::- in 13:1. Inside this speech, there is
a section on tithes and offerings (verses 4-14) and another on clean and unclean foods
(15-28). Lundbom identifies both as being dealt with once again in Deut 14:1-21 and
Deut 14:22 to 15:23 respectively. The last one deals with these themes in inverse order.
77
What is interesting in Lundboms methodology is the way he relies upon the
textual evidence for the identification of these inclusio structures and the internal
structures of the texts he addresses. It would be interesting to analyze these passages by
using a text linguistic methodology as DeRouchie
78
did with Deut 5-11 in order to
74
Ibid., 302-304.
75
Ibid., 304-306.
76
Ibid., 306ss
77
Ibid., 306.
78
DeRouchie, A Call to Covenant Love.
24
appraise their literary structures, rhetoric, and theology in a deeper way. It is clear also
that Lundboms study is focused on framing structures as literary and rhetorical devices
in a long section of Deuteronomy, namely chapters 1-28. Because of the extensive
textual data, the theology of these texts is not studied in a deeper way.
Another author who has recently used a rhetorical approach with emphasis on the
textual evidence is Robert H. OConnell. OConnells studies scrutiny deal with shorter
passages than Lundboms study. These shorter texts allow OConnell to pay detailed
attention to the text and its theology. This is evident even in the way in which he deals
with the text; not only tracking keywords but also analyzing, as far as possible according
to his method, the literary and rhetorical function of every single clause thus addressing
the overall literary strategy of the passage.
OConnells first study under consideration deals with Deut 8:1-20,
79
analyzing its
internal rhetorical structure and its rhetorical function in the context of Deut 4-11. In this
study, he departs from only seeking textual markers in verbatim correspondence as
Lundbom did. OConnell looks for the position and rhetorical function of the vocabulary
under focus including semantic correspondence.
80
He finds a concentric asymmetric
parallelism running all through the text of Deut 8:1-20 with its axis in Deut 8:7b-9.
OConnell thinks that the asymmetries are due to rhetorical antithetical purposes which
he suggests are located in the correspondences between A and 1/a, and B and 1/b
respectively.
81
This procedure shows that OConnell is not only after keywords; he maps
79
See Robert H. OConnell, Deuteronomy VIII 1-20: Asymmetrical
Concentricity and the Rhetoric of Providence, Vetus Testamentum 40, no. 4 (October
1990): 437-452.
80
Ibid., 441.
81
A(8:1a)B(1bab)C(1bg)D(2a)E(2ba)F(2bb)G(3a)H(3b)I(4)J(5)
K(6)L(7a)AXIS(7b-9)L(10)K(11)J(1214aba)I(14bb15b)G(16a)E(16ab)
25
out the whole text of Deut 8:1-20 in its immediate context. This way he discloses the
rhetorical features that carry out the argument and then explains the possible cause for the
asymmetry of the text.
Once OConnell has analyzed the position and distribution of the whole
vocabulary of the text, he moves toward the rhetoric of the passage. OConnells analysis
generally moves from vocabulary distribution to rhetoric back and forth until he
discovers the theology portrayed through the rhetorical devices present in the text. Once
the rhetoric and the theology of Deut 8:1-20 have been identified and exposed the
rhetoric of the text is seen against the larger context of Deut 4-11.
82
In this process he
deals with the syntactic and literary peculiarities of the text.
OConnells second and third studies, dealing with Deut 7:1-26 and Deut 9:7-
10:7, 11-12 respectively, follow the same methodology of mapping the text. In these
studies, he unveils the internal rhetoric devices and the structure of the passage as shown
in the literary arrangement of its vocabulary. He next proceeds to the analysis of the
rhetoric of the passage, which he explains based on the rhetoric already revealed and the
irregularities in the literary arrangement. As a result, the theology and the intention of the
passage are worked out in the context of Deut 4-11, and correlated with the previous
analysis of Deut 8:1-20 that he has made in his previous study.
83
H(16bg)F(17)D(18a)C(18b)Virtual Warning (19):1/A(19a)1/B(19b)Virtual
Warning (20): 1B(20a)/1A(20b), this distribution shows the asymmetry alluded. Ibid.,
441-445.
82
Ibid., 451-452.
83
See Robert H. OConnell, Deuteronomy VII 1-26: Asymmetrical
Concentricity and the Rhetoric of Conquest, Vetus Testamentum 42, no. 2 (October
1992): 248-265 and Robert H. OConnell, Deuteronomy IX 7-X 7, 10-11: Panelled
Structure, Double Rehearsal and the Rhetoric of Covenant Rebuke, Vetus Testamentum
42, no. 4 (October 1992): 492-509. These articles analyze the passages in the
perspective of the overall structure and rhetorical strategy of their contexts.
26
So far, we have seen that Lundboms article tracks the key words of the text under
study (Deut 1-28) and identifies its literary-rhetorical framing devices. OConnells
studies address shorter passages (Deut 8:1-20, 7:1-27 and 9:7-10:7, 10-11). OConnell
seeks to reveal the internal distribution of the vocabulary and clauses in the text. This
procedure makes it possible for him to recognize the rhetorical structures and strategies
that might be present.
OConnell then, having identified the rhetorical strategies, proceeds to identify the
setting of the theology in its immediate and larger literary context; this context is, in this
case, Deut 4-11. Therefore, OConnells methodology moves from vocabulary and clause
distribution to rhetoric, using the rhetoric to explain the possible structural irregularities
and then moving from rhetoric to theology. These two procedures, Lundboms and
OConnells, could be used in a complementary way in order to identify in the text, the
framing and other literary devices as well as the internal rhetoric of the passages. This
way also the literary peculiarities or apparent irregularities may also be addressed.
Probably a deeper text-oriented
84
analysis might provide wider perspectives about the
rationale for the possible literary irregularities Lundbom and OConnell have found in the
literary-rhetorical structures of the texts that they have analyzed.
OConnells methodology moving from vocabulary and clause distribution to
rhetoric and then from rhetoric to theology might be refined. Maybe the concept of this
approach might be modified so as to move the analysis of the text from microsyntax to
macrosyntax and then from macrosyntax to theology. In this way, the theological
analysis of a text could be better grounded in the text itself and structural and literary
peculiarities addressed in more detail.
84
For a brief rationale, exploration and example of the text-oriented approach in
exegesis, see Prbstle, Truth and Terror, 8-29, 30-89.
27
Text-linguistics. This section briefly reviews one study that applies a text-
linguistic approach to Deut 5-11. In a long textual sample, Jason DeRouchie studies text
grammar, structure and theology. DeRouchies dissertation
85
reviews over 30 years of
scholarly studies in Deuteronomy from Lohfink
86
to Talstra.
87
This period is part of what
Christensen calls the fourth phase in the history of the studies in Deuteronomy. This
phase began with Lohfink's study, which inaugurated the stylistic analysis in the text of
Deuteronomy.
88
From this review, DeRouchie concludes that these studies have counted,
charted, and evaluated the whole vocabulary and clauses; none, however, has performed
a full text-linguistic analysis of the entire corpus.
89
The purpose of this research
endeavor is to contribute to fill this gap in the current knowledge in the field and thus test
this methodology.
DeRouchie takes advantage of the recent linguistic advances in the study of
biblical Hebrew, as becomes evident even from a cursory review of his study and its
bibliography. Next, he moves from form to meaning and then to function. This he does,
assuming that discourse function is determined by the meaning of certain forms in given
contexts.
90
From this aspect, he recognizes that probably text-type and/or context
85
DeRouchie, A Call to Covenant Love, 6-25. The studies that DeRouchie
reviews provide examples of different stages in the process of the methodological shift
from diachronical (critical) approaches that concentrated in the editorial history of the
texts toward literary (synchronical) studies concentrating in the final form of the text and
its literary features.
86
Norbert Lohfink, Das hauptgebot: Eine untersuchung literarischer
einleitungsfragen zu Dtn 5-11, Analecta Biblica 20 (Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto
Biblico, 1963).
87
Talstra, Deuteronomy 9 and 10 Synchronic and Diachronic Observations,
187-210.
88
Christensen, Deuteronomy 21:10-34:12, xxxii, xxxv-xxxvii.
89
DeRouchie, A Call to Covenant Love, 25.
90
Ibid., 26-27.
28
influence meaning and similar forms may bear nuanced meanings and distinct
functions in various contexts.
91
DeRouchie proceeds in his study to define, classify and analyze the clauses in the
passage.
92
Once syntactical issues are clarified, he analyzes text logic, then
foregrounding, and then identifies text types.
93
Based on this information, DeRouchie
traces the argument of the whole text of Deut 5-11. In order to trace the argument, he
relies upon the location of the Hebrew discourse markers in the text.
94
DeRouchie then,
based on the information already obtained, proceeds to the structural analysis and
interpretation of the passage.
95
His methodology moves from text linguistics to the flow
of thought, which provides him the structure of the passage, and from the flow of thought
to the theology of the text. DeRouchie seeks to keep his study grounded in the textual
evidence. In this way, he attempts to make it evident that text grammar works hand-in-
hand with semantic meaning and discourse function to establish the message of a text.
96
This approach allows the locus of authority to be grounded in the text during the
interpretative endeavor. Hans Rechenmacher and Christo H. J. van der Merwe have
suggested that in this way the literary arguments of the researcher, which might be based
on the understanding of his or her own mother language, could be better controlled as a
way to gain a better understanding of the structure of Biblical Hebrew.
97
In this sense
91
Ibid., 27.
92
Ibid., 54-76.
93
Ibid., 76-85, 96-202.
94
Ibid., 202-217.
95
Ibid., 218-273.
96
Ibid., 272.
97
Rechenmacher and van der Merwe, The Contribution of Wolfgang Richter,
70.
29
Rechenmacher and van der Merwe provide an example taken from Num 27:11b. The text
says: -~e::: :s : s::. They observe that
two preposition word groups are dependent on a single adjective. In English the
attributive word group has to be translated as a relative clause. One may argue
that this type of investigation may lead to the rebuttal of literary critical arguments
that often regard these types of constructions as unusually long or clumsy and
hence later additions.
98
Therefore this construction in Num 27:11b may be identified as an addition as
well as a syntactical structure not previously noted. Additionally, this approach functions
as a tool to better understand the so-called irregularities in the text on the grounds of
linguistic data.
Summary
The previous review surveys some of the most representative and recent
methodological approaches to the scholarly study of the book of Deuteronomy with
emphasis on Deut 28:69-30:20. This review has included perspectives such as historical-
critical, narrative, synchronic-canonical rhetorical-critical and text linguistic. Their
contributions to the understanding of the text and its theology have been highlighted. In
the same way some limitations have been also brought into attention, including issues
such as the nature, function and textual significance of resumptive repetition
(Wiederaufnahme), the repetitive changes in the morphological number of the addresses
(Numeruswechsel) and covenant features, both literary and theological. The location and
identification of textual markers seem to be also an issue that requires more analysis as
well as the location and function of Deut 28:69 in relation to the flow of the previous
(Deut 27:1-28:68) and the posterior text (Deut 29:1-30:20). The fact that these issues still
are under discussion tells us that they require a fresh analysis. Additionally, this review
98
Ibid., 70.
30
has shown according to the available literature that Deut 28:69-30:20 has not been yet the
object of a textlinguistic analysis. Thus, this study will try the textlinguistic
methodological approach to this passage.
31
CHAPTER 2
TEXTLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS (PART I)
This chapter and the next pay attention to some linguistic aspects of Deut 28:69-
30:20 in order to assess its internal flow and structure as a basis of assessing its theology.
Chapter 2 will work with Deut 28:69-29:28 and Chapter 3 with Deut 30:1-20. This
division is made based on mechanical considerations and for the sake of the reader.
These linguistic aspects, as stated in the methodology, deal with micro
1
and macro
syntax
2
so the syntax of the paragraph and then of the whole speech is studied. In this
way, this chapter will provide information to be used in the next chapter that deals with
structural aspects of the passage and then the information provided by the syntactical and
structural analysis will inform the theological analysis.
This text linguistic analysis aims to explain the nature and function of the
different textual aspects of this passage as outlined in the statement of the problem.
These textual aspects in Deut 28:69-30:20 deal with the resumptive repetition or
Wiederaufnahme, the shift in the grammatical person and number of the audience
(Numeruswechsel and Personenwechsel) and those clauses that seem to function as
1
The microsyntactical analysis deals with the regular grammar and syntax of the
clause plus other aspects such as the amount and order of words as well as verbal
position.
2
The macrosyntactical analysis deals with supra clause syntax. The focus is on
aspects such as clause coordination, subordination and verbal distribution. The clauses
are identified and tagged in reference to their flow in the text as main line (foreground)
and off-line (background) clauses. It is also analyzed the presence and distribution of the
Numeruswechsel and Personenwechsel.
32
headings in the text. The location and function of Deut 28:69 will be object of analysis.
The verbal distribution is assessed in search of the flow and the form of the text. Word
order analysis aims to identify the focus of the text. This verbal distribution is shown in
one single section in table format in Appendix A. The analysis of the usage of certain
prepositions and particles may complement the previous aspects making evident the
internal flow of the text. Finally, the linguistic analysis of these textual features aims to
identify literary strategies that might help to inform the structure and then the theology of
the text expressed in the covenant vocabulary and forms present in the text.
In harmony with what has been expressed, the whole text of Deut 28:69-30:20 has
been divided into clauses and each one of them has been syntagmatically and
syntactically analyzed and provisionally translated into English. Textual critical issues
are analyzed when they might be pertinent and as a way to ascertain how the ancient
scribes and translators dealt with the text as they tried to understand it. The syntactical
and syntagmatical analysis implies first, the internal syntactical structure of the clause
paying attention to the function and order of each word and then the type of the clause
that has been identified. Second, the syntactical relationship of the clause with the
previous and following clauses has been established. Third, the composition and nature
of the predicate is identified and then, according to the predicate analysis, it is established
if the clause belongs to the foreground (main line) or the background (off-line) of the
text. The database of this syntactical and syntagmatical analysis can be found in
Appendix B.
Syntagmatical and Syntactical Analysis of Deut 28:96-29:28
The text has been provisionally subdivided into subsections following the major
Masoretic paragraph markersthe petuHah (e) and the setumah (:). Once the
33
syntagmatic and textlinguistic analysis is done, a better structural perception of the text
will be obtained and analyzed as part of the discussion in Chapter 4 which deals with the
internal structure of Deut 28:69-30:20 and its relationship with the overall structure of the
book.
In this chapter the reader will find first the Hebrew text of the section to be
analyzed and already divided into sintagms (\) and into clauses (/), then the same text in a
table presentation by clauses with its notation and English translation and this is followed
by the discussion of the pertinent critical notes and versional information. The location
of the textual variants in the Hebrew text is marked after the implicated word or
expression by using italic superscript letters (
a
). This is to avoid confusion with the
clause notation, which is indicated by regular superscript letters (
a
), located before the
first word of the new clause. Once the critical notes are analyzed, there follows a
discussion of the rationale for the clause identification together with the relevant
syntactical, semantic and literary features. This linguistic discussion will be done clause
by clause so duplicity of information might be avoided as much as possible. Finally, a
summary follows before embracing the analysis of the next section of the passage. This
summary will include the textual, syntactical, structural and semantic information derived
from the discussion.
Deuteronomy 28:69
This section provides the Hebrew text of Deut 28:69 and the relevant textual
critical issues and versional data are evaluated. The working translation of the Hebrew
text is provided. Then the clause division is provided prior to the syntagmatic and
syntactical discussion of the clauses. Finally, a summary of the linguistic discussion is
provided.
34
Hebrew text of Deut 28:69. \ ::-s \ \ s:s
b
/\ -: :
a
s
a 69