In Illinois, courts have steadily shifted the boundaries between legislative and judicial power. Courts have adopted a construction of judicial power that asserts dominance over court rule-making. This expansionist concept culminated in People v. Jackson, where the court held one of its rules would supersede any conflicting legislative enactment.
In Illinois, courts have steadily shifted the boundaries between legislative and judicial power. Courts have adopted a construction of judicial power that asserts dominance over court rule-making. This expansionist concept culminated in People v. Jackson, where the court held one of its rules would supersede any conflicting legislative enactment.
In Illinois, courts have steadily shifted the boundaries between legislative and judicial power. Courts have adopted a construction of judicial power that asserts dominance over court rule-making. This expansionist concept culminated in People v. Jackson, where the court held one of its rules would supersede any conflicting legislative enactment.