Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Background/Stats Reasonsforouraction FHWAMemoranda LADOTDActionsandDecisions(Bridge
Maintenance) ProgressReport(Projects,Methodology)
NatlBackground&Stats
590,000highwaybridgesintheU.S.National
SI&AGuide
Provides
CriticalBridge Rating
Item113 ScourCriticalBridges
8 Bridgefoundationsdeterminedtobestablefortheassessedor
casewherebridgehasnotyetbeenevaluatedforscourpotential) forassessedorcalculatedscourconditions calculatedscourcondition.Scourisdeterminedtobeabovetopoffooting
U Bridgewith"unknown"foundationthathasnotbeenevaluatedfor
consideredlowrisk.
T Bridgeovertidalwatersthathasnotbeenevaluatedforscour,but
Scour?
TypesofScour
LocalScour removalofsedimentfromaroundbridge
piersorabutments
ContractionScour removalofsedimentfromthe
bottomandsidesofacreek,streamorriver
Degradational Scour removalofsedimentfromthe
riverbottombythenaturalflowofariver
SchoharieCreekBridgeCollapseduetoscour FHWATechnicalAdvisoryT5140.23
Requiredstatestoevaluateexistingbridgesforscour RequiredallDOTstodevelopPlansofActionforvulnerabletoscour
FHWAMemoranda
January9,2008 Providedguidanceanddeadline(November2010)for
eliminatingthepopulationofbridgeshavingunknownfoundations
June3,2009 DeemeditacceptabletohaveabridgecodedUforSI&A
item113afterNovember2010aslongasaPOAwasdeveloped
Compliance
SchoharieCreekBridge
FinaldesignacceptedinJanuary1952 Bridgedesigncalledforfivespanssupportedbyconcretepier
SchoharieCreekBridgeContd
1 1 2.5' 27.75' 57'
Symmetrical about C L
27.75'
Deck
M ain G irder
S lo p e d E m b an km e n t
Stringer at 8'-6" o.c. Bearing 7'-0" sq Column 0'-0" deep 5'-0" wide X1 Tie Beam Floor Beam at approx. 20' o.c. Cantilever Floor Beam Ends
N O R T H R ip rap S lo p e d E m b an km e n t
Knee Brace
W e s tA b u tm e n t F lo w
PIER 1 PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 4
E a s t A b u tm e n t
Column
Plinth Reinforcement
Plinth
1 00' S P A N1
1 1 0' S P A N2
1 20' S P A N3
1 1 0' S P A N4
1 00' S P A N5
Observations
6inchesofrainfall
experienced1year aftercompletion
SchoharieCreekContd
SchoharieCreekContd
HereinLouisiana
1990s Beganassessingbridgesforscour
ForAGoodCause
FHWAJanuary2008Mandate November2010 targetdateforeliminating
bridgeswithunknownfoundationsfromthe NBI
Ifstructuresratedscourcriticalremain,theremustbeaPOA
createdforthem.
LouisianaScour
BayouAnacoco HickoryBranch
WhatHaveWEDone ?
1990s LADOTDbeganassessingbridgesforscour
Research
In2003LADOTDwasapproachedbyFDHSE,Inc. SpecializedinDispersiveWavemethodology Othermethodsavailableincluded; ParallelSeismic Crossboreholelogging SonicEcho
PilotProject
107Bridgesweretested 11Controlstructures
DistributionofTestSites
Results
Inconsistencyinresultsforsteelpiles Someerrorsintimberpiles,duetopoorselectionof
IntentionsforDataUsage
BridgeScouranalysistobeconducted ScourSusceptibilityratedbasedonpredictedscour
CurrentTesting
LADOTDcontractedFDHSE,Inc.totest1248
UnknownFoundationsElimination
CategoryA:composedofbridgesthatareactively
scouringorhaveexistingscourholes
CategoryB:composedofbridgesthathavehad
inactivescourinseveralyears.CatBalsoincludes bridgeswithdriftproblems
CategoryC:composedofbridgesthathavehadno
measuredscouroverthelast20years(alsoincludes thosebuiltafter2000)
LADOTDMandateResponse
CategorydefinitionsweredevelopedbasedonFunctionalClassification(I26),ADT(I29),
andDetourLength(I19). Sometargetdatesarebelow.
November30,2010 AllBridgesstillcodedUshallhaveaPOAdevelopedand
implemented(4000bridges)
November30,2010 Obtainafinalapprovedactionplanfortheeliminationof
UnknownFoundationsfromFHWA
evaluationofbridgesthathavepreviouspilelengthtestingcompleted.(1621bridges)
December31,2015 CompletionofallbridgeevaluationsforbridgesinCategoryC.
Sometimes,youhavetolookunderground