Dean Radin discusses the taboo of studying PSI (psychic phenomena) in science. He summarizes that over 130 years of research through studies conducted by governments and scientific institutions have concluded that something interesting is occurring with phenomena like intuition, telepathy, and precognition that warrants further investigation. However, PSI remains controversial and neglected by mainstream science. Radin argues that dismissing PSI claims requires re-examining assumptions about the nature of reality and human consciousness.
Dean Radin discusses the taboo of studying PSI (psychic phenomena) in science. He summarizes that over 130 years of research through studies conducted by governments and scientific institutions have concluded that something interesting is occurring with phenomena like intuition, telepathy, and precognition that warrants further investigation. However, PSI remains controversial and neglected by mainstream science. Radin argues that dismissing PSI claims requires re-examining assumptions about the nature of reality and human consciousness.
Dean Radin discusses the taboo of studying PSI (psychic phenomena) in science. He summarizes that over 130 years of research through studies conducted by governments and scientific institutions have concluded that something interesting is occurring with phenomena like intuition, telepathy, and precognition that warrants further investigation. However, PSI remains controversial and neglected by mainstream science. Radin argues that dismissing PSI claims requires re-examining assumptions about the nature of reality and human consciousness.
of PSI Dean Radin Bio By The Silva Method DEAN RADIN Dean Radin, Ph.D., is a researcher and author in the eld of parapsychology. uean 8adln, hu, ls Senlor SclenusL aL Lhe lnsuLuLe of noeuc Sclences (lCnS). Pls rsL career as a concerL vlollnlsL shled lnLo sclence aer earnlng a masLers degree ln elecLrlcal englneerlng and a hu ln psychology from Lhe unlverslLy of llllnols, Champalgn-urbana. lor a decade he worked on advanced Lelecommunlcauons 8&u aL A1&1 8ell LaboraLorles and C1L LaboraLorles, for over Lwo decades he has been engaged ln consclousness research. 8efore [olnlng Lhe research sLa aL lCnS, he held appolnLmenLs aL rlnceLon unlverslLy, unlverslLy of Ldlnburgh, unlverslLy of nevada, and Lhree Slllcon val l ey L hl nk- Lanks, l ncl udl ng S8l lnLernauonal, where he worked on a classled program lnvesugaung psychlc phenomena for Lhe uS governmenL. Pe ls auLhor or coauLhor of over 200 Lechnlcal and popular arucles, a dozen book chapLers, and several books lncludlng Lhe besLselllng 1he Consclous unl verse ( ParperCne, 1997) and LnLangled Mlnds (Slmon & SchusLer, 2006). Pl s Lechnl cal arucl es have appeared ln [ournals ranglng from loundauons of hyslcs, Lo sychologlcal 8ulleun, !ournal of AlLernauve and ComplemenLary Medlclne, and !ournal of Consclousness SLudles. Pe has been lnLervlewed for Lelevlslon shows ranglng from Cprah and Larry klng Llve, Lo Lhe 88C's Porlzon and 8S's Closer Lo 1ruLh, 2 and he has presenLed over a hundred lnvlLed lecLures ln venues lncludlng Parvard, SLanford and rl nceLon unl versl ues, Coogl e headquarLers, and uA8A. Consclousness SLudles. Pe has been lnLervlewed for Lelevlslon shows ranglng from Cprah and Larry klng Llve, Lo Lhe 88C's Porlzon and 8S's Cl oser Lo 1ruLh, and he has presenLed over a hundred lnvlLed lecLures ln venues lncludlng Parvard, SLanford and rlnceLon unlverslues, Coogle headquarLers, and uA8A. Many people belleve LhaL "Sl" ls [usL supersuuous nonsense. CLhers belleve LhaL Lhelr experlences are conslsLenL enough Lo warranL furLher lnvesugauon and make Lhem lnLo bellevers. 1he skepucs hlL back by saylng LhaL Lhelr are: 1hls may be because Laboo ln scl ence resLrl cLs enqul ry, and resLrlcLs whaL ldeas are accepLable. A Laboo ln sclence ls where lnformed consensus l s consLral ned, and sclence resLs on lnformed consensus. All Lhls means ls LhaL Lhls 1aboo ls susLalned, as has been Lhe case for hundreds of years. 8uL here ls Lhe Lhlng. 1here have been four sLudles done on sclence (whlch are dlsclosed), Lhey were 1981, Congressl onal 8esearch Sclence, 1983, Army 8esearch lnsuLuLe, 1987, nauonal 8esearch Counc l l a nd 1989 Cmc e of 1echnology AssessmenL. Al l four of L hem concl uded, someLhlng lnLeresung was golng on and furLher l nvesugauon was necessary. 1hls research lncluded "Trillions of experiences in the world, and the select few which make news are not normal". D E A N R A D I N
f e a t u r e d
b y
T h e
S i l v a
M e t h o d And this is why studying the history of psi is important. People have been reporting these phenomena for millennia and studying them for centuries. Human experiences that continue to be repeated throughout history and across cultures, are not due to ignorance or lack of critical thinking, and demand a serious explanation.
Source: Dean Radin Science And the taboo of PSI 3 D E A N R A D I N
f e a t u r e d
b y
T h e
S i l v a
M e t h o d skepucs. ln 1993, a revlew of "remoLe vlewlng" evldence for ClA (1993) resulLed ln concluslons such as: "uslng sLandards applled Lo any oLher area of sclence, lL ls concluded LhaL psychlc funcLlonlng has been well esLabllshed", whlle a skepLlc who oversaw Lhe sLudy remarked "..free of meLhodologlcal weaknesses ..effecL slzes ..are Loo large and conslsLenL Lo be dlsmlssed as sLaLlsLlcal flukes..". SomeLhlng lnLeresung ls denlLely golng on! lor over 130 years of l ncreasl ngl y sophlsucaLed meLhods, Lhese eecLs have noL dlsappeared even under scruuny. 8uL why are you Lhen noL LaughL abouL lL ln college. !"#$% '()$ " *+,--. lf we look aL Lhe experlences LhaL a person goes Lhrough, some of Lhem belng belng frequenL and mundane, such as guL feellngs, feellng of belng sLared aL and LelepaLhy, whlch are amenable Lo sclenuc sLudy, buL are hlghly conLroverslal, Lhere are rare experlences whlch are presenLly beyond Lhe reach of sclence buL are largely accepLed. 1hls conLroversy ls because of Lhe Laboo naLure of Lhe Loplc and noL because of daLa or ndlngs. 1here are Lhree ways of lnformauon ow: LelepaLhy, mlnd mauer lnLeracuon and precognluon. Maintaining an open mind is essenti al when expl ori ng the unknown, but allowing ones brains to fal l out i n the process i s inadvisable. Dean Radin There are about 17,500 institutions of higher learning, only about 50 academics are interested in PSI, which is about 0.3%, BUT over 90% of the population is interested in the topic. 8ules Lo sLudy Lhese are: Puman performance varles, LxperlmenLal resulLs wlll vary, small eecLs are real, many experlences are ln facL noL psychlc. So how do we LesL LelepaLhy? We seL up a LesL called Canzfeld, where one person ls puL ln a room ln dark llghL, hls eyes covered wlLh plng pong balls, and he ls asked Lo keep hls eyes open, headphones wlLh whlLe nolse ls plugged so he reaches ln a half dream sLaLe. now we seL a sender Lo send a parucular chosen message Lo Lhe recelver ln Lhe red llghL. We Lhen ask hlm Lo Lalk. Cnce we are Lhrough Lhls we make Lhe person hear Lo whaL he sald and ldenufy Lhe ob[ecL he saw. 1 ouL of four umes Lhe person would say Lhe same Lhlng LhaL Lhe sender was Lrylng Lo send hlm. 1haL's 23. 1here have been repeaLed researches and concluslons LhaL says LhaL 1elepaLhy exlsLs. uean Lhen lays several sclenuc experlmenLs, done by varlous sclenusLs, wlLh conslderable daLa LhaL proves LhaL "8emoLe vlewlng", "1elepaLhy" does exlsL. eople oen says LhaL exLraordlnary clalms requlre exLraordlnary evldence - buL whaL ls exLraordlnary? l f we say exLraordl nary l n Lerms of experlences - well LhaL permeaLes culLure, hlsLory and educauonal levels. lf we wanL emplrlcal evldence, we have over 130 years of daLa. WhaL abouL 1heory - Cuesuon are Lhe exlsung Lheorles compleLe. WhaL abouL CnLologlcal vlew - non Local unlverse ls compauble wlLh CnLologlcal vlew. So Sl clalms are ordlnary, and Lhey are acLually real. So why should lL mauer? 1hls sLudy and more augmenLs who and whaL we Lhlnk we are. lL also challenges an lsolaLed, mechanlsuc, mlnd=braln, polnLless worldvlew: "?ou are noLhlng buL a pack of neurons". D E A N R A D I N
f e a t u r e d
b y
T h e
S i l v a
M e t h o d Summarized Inferences from the Presentation: - PSI is a Taboo in Science - and has been neglected by scientists for decades - Intuition, telepathy, and PSI have been proven to be exist by over 130 years of study - but wider research needs to be done to prove their value to societyn - Even Skeptics agree that "something Interesting" is happening - and that more research needs to be done to prove/dis-prove the theories