Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Successful teacher candidates support learning by designing a Unit Work Sample that employs a range of strategies and builds on each students strengths, needs and prior experiences. Through this performance assessment, candidates provide credible evidence of their ability to facilitate learning by meeting the following standards: The candidate uses multiple assessment strategies and approaches aligned with learning goals to assess student learning before, during and after instruction. The candidate designs instruction for specific learning goals, student characteristics and needs, and learning contexts. The candidate uses regular and systematic evaluations of student learning to make instructional decisions. The candidate uses assessment data to profile student learning and communicate information about student progress and achievement. The candidate reflects on his or her instruction and student learning in order to improve teaching practice.
The candidate will create a Unit Work Sample to demonstrate its impact on student learning. The attached template, which consists of several components, should be used to fulfill this requirement. Attach samples of student work as an appendix.
EDUC 450: PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL PRACTICE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY UNIT WORK SAMPLE TEMPLATE
Candidate: Hillary Tindall Academic Year: 2014 School: Whittaker Elementary School Subject: ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies
Cooperating Teacher: Faye Thompson District: Orangeburg Consolidated School District 5 Grade Level: 2nd Dates of unit: from January 27th to February 14th
Section I: Unit Title and/or Description: ELA: Lessons and Morals. This unit focused on lessons and morals from folktales and stories. The unit also focused on comparing and contrasting stories from different cultures as well answering and asking questions. Social Studies: Changing Communities. This unit focused on the three types of communities and the changes of communities from long ago to present day.
Section II: Description of Students: Describe (1) the number of students, (2) demographics of the students, and (3)
any other special features or important information that you included in your Long Range Plan as you described your students.
This is a second grade ELA, Math, Science and Social Studies class with 19 students. There are 12 boys and 7 girls in the class. 16 of the students are of the African American race, and 2 of the students are of the Hispanic race. In the class, there are 17 students who receive reduced lunch, 1 student who receives free lunch, and 1 student who pays for lunch. None of the students have IEPs. The class has 3 students who identify as English Language Learners. These students receive assistance from the districts TESOL instructor. There is 1 student whos reading level ranges from 0.0-0.09. There are 9 students whose reading level ranges from 1.01.9. There are 7 students whose reading level ranges from 2.0-2.9. There are 3 students whose reading level ranges from 3.0-3.9.
Section III: Contextual Factors: Describe the contextual factors, including the (1) relevant student characteristics from
Section II, as well (2) as other factors related to the community, district, school, classroom or students, that are likely to impact instruction and/or student learning with regard to the selected instructional unit. Include a (3) description of the ways in which each of these factors will be taken into consideration during unit planning and instruction.
There are 12 male students and 7 female students in the class. 16 of the students are of the African American race, and 3 students are of the Hispanic race. There are 17 students who receive reduced lunch, 1 student who receives free lunch, and 1 student who pays for lunch. None of the students have IEPs. The class has 3 students who identify as English Language Learners. These students receive assistance from the districts TESOL instructor.
Section IV: The Unit Plan Section IV A: Major Unit Objectives (1) List the unit objectives and (2) indicate the corresponding state standards.
(Remember objectives must contain 4 parts: performance, product, conditions and criterion.)
Unit Objectives
Correlated Standards/Expectations
RL.2.9.
RL.2.2. RI.2.1.
Social Studies
4) 95% of students will be able to recognize the features of urban, suburban, and rural areas of the local region. 5) 95% of students will be able to summarize the changes that have occurred in the local community over time, including changes in the use of land and in the ways people earn their living. 2-1.3 2-1.4
Reflect on the instructional plans for the units: How does this instructional plan (1) establish a balance between grade-level academic standards and expectations and the needs, abilities and developmental levels of individual students? (2) Discuss the strategies used to teach students on varying levels. (3) Disc uss how you designed your instructional plan using students characteristics, needs and learning contexts.
The instructional plan allows me to establish a balance between grade-level academic standards and expectation and the needs, abilities and developmental levels of individual students by allowing me to prepare effective lesson plans that will meet the needs of all the students. I will be allowed to plan grade level activities and create new strategies that will enhance student learning as well as cater to their skills. Various strategies such as using technology, allowing students to work in groups, using hands on activities and incorporating music and dance will be used to teach students on varying levels. These various strategies will give me the opportunity to teach the content through different approaches allowing students on varying levels to grasp the content. I designed my instructional plan using students characteristics, needs, and learning contexts. The socioeconomic status, reading levels and race of the students influenced the design of my instructional plan by guiding me in planning effective lessons, activities, and strategies that will be relatable to the students. The relevance of such strategies and activities will ultimately motivate the students to want to learn more and become more engaged.
Section V A: Unit Assessments - List the key unit assessments. Type of Assessment (Check one for each assessment) Teacher-Made Commercially (A copy of each teacher Available
Lessons and Morals Asking and Answering Questions Compare and Contrast Urban, Suburban and Rural Change in Communities
Reflect on the unit assessments: (1) How did you determine that your unit assessments are valid and reliable for all students? (2) How did you use your prior understanding of students skills to plan your instruction?
I determined that my unit assessments are valid and reliable for all students by making sure that the assessments aligned with the content that was taught in the unit. I also made sure that the assessments aligned with the standards and unit objectives. Lastly, I held a review session before giving the assessments to determine whether the students fully grasped the content taught in the lesson and/or unit. I used my prior understanding of students skills to plan my instruction. I reflected on the range of reading levels in the class to choose the proper reading material used during the unit. I also used examples in the lessons that students can relate to. For example, I used familiar fables and examples of their community and surrounding area. I realized that my students enjoy using music and movements to learn. I used this knowledge to incorporate songs into the unit in such a way that students will strengthen their knowledge of the topic.
Section V B: Assessments (1) Describe and attach the assessments for each unit objective. (2) Include descriptions
of any necessary accommodations. For each assessment, (3) include the evaluation criteria (i.e., describe and/or attach each appropriate scoring rubric, observation checklists, rating scales, item weights and the like). (4) Attachments must be clearly labeled to indicate their relationship to the elements in the table below.
Assessments
Unit Objective 1: : Pre-Assessment(s)
Accommodations
The time adjusted. frame might
Evaluation Criteria
: Post-Assessment(s)
be A= 100-93 B= 92-85 C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below Depending on the results, a A= 100-93 second attempt may be given to B= 92-85 students. C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below
: Other Assessment(s)
Unit Objective 2:
:Pre-Assessment(s)
: Post-Assessment(s)
be A= 100-93 B= 92-85 C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below Depending on the results, a A= 100-93 second attempt may be given to B= 92-85 students. C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below
frame
might
: Other Assessment(s)
Unit Objective 3:
: Pre-Assessment(s)
: Post-Assessment(s)
be A= 100-93 B= 92-85 C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below Depending on the results, a A= 100-93 second attempt may be given to B= 92-85 students. C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below
frame
might
: Other Assessment(s) Unit Objective 4: : Pre-Assessment(s) The time adjusted. be A= 100-93 B= 92-85 C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below Depending on the results, a A= 100-93 second attempt may be given to B= 92-85 students. C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below frame might
: Post-Assessment(s)
: Other Assessment(s)
: Post-Assessment(s)
be A= 100-93 B= 92-85 C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below Depending on the results, a A= 100-93 second attempt may be given to B= 92-85 students. C= 84-77 D= 76-70 F= 69 and below
frame
might
: Other Assessment(s)
ELA Section V C: After administering the pre-assessment(s), (1) analyze student performance relative to the unit objectives. (2)
Attach one or more clearly labeled tables, graphs, or charts that depict the results of the pre-assessment(s) in a format that allows you to find patterns of student performance relative to each objective. (3) Summarize the results of the preassessment(s) and describe the implications of these results on instruction.
After administering the pre-assessments on the ELA unit objectives, I noticed that at least half of the students knew some information in regards to the lesson topics. The students performances on the pre-assessments did not align with the three ELA unit objectives. The performance of my students on their pre-assessments let me know the areas that I needed to focus more on during my lessons. I planned my instruction to concentrate on content that student may have had problems with understanding. Compare Questions Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 and Contrast Lessons and Student 1 50 100 80 30 40 70 10 50 80 90 40 50 30 70 0 60 50 60 70 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 60 100 100 90 20 90 60 60 100 100 60 100 90 80 50 90 90 80 80 Asking Morals Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 30 80 80 40 0 90 40 40 70 80 30 50 70 70 40 80 50 50 60 and Answering
The information provided by the analysis of the assessments increased my understanding of individual students performance. The assessments allowed for me to see what my students fully understood after the lesson was taught. I was also able to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of my students in regards to their understanding of the content. After adjusting my lesson plans and strategies to the needs of my students, I realized that majority of the students performed better on the post-assessments. For those students who did not perform well on the post-assessments I used a small group to reteach the content. I have attached clearly labeled tables and charts depicting the results of the pre-assessments as well as post-assessments. These tables and charts allowed for me to find patterns of student performance relative to each objective. The results of both assessments were recorded in the grade book as well as recorded in Power School. The parents of students also received a progress report with the assessments attached.
Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Revised Fall 2013 ACEI/NAEYC 2010 Standards
100 100 100 100 80 90 100 90 100 100 90 100 100 100 90
Compare Questions Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19
100 90 70 100
Asking Morals Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 100 100 100 100 80 90 100 90 100 100 90 100 100 100 90 100 90 70 100
and
Answering
Scores
Students
Preassessment Post Assessment
Scores
Student
Preassessment Postassessment
Scores
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Students
Preassessment Postassessment
Social Studies
Section V C: After administering the pre-assessment(s), (1) analyze student performance relative to the unit objectives. (2)
Attach one or more clearly labeled tables, graphs, or charts that depict the results of the pre-assessment(s) in a format that allows you to find patterns of student performance relative to each objective. (3) Summarize the results of the preassessment(s) and describe the implications of these results on instruction.
After administering the pre-assessments on the Social Studies unit objectives, I noticed that most of my students did not know the information related to the lesson topics. The performances of students on the pre-assessments did not align with the two Social Studies unit objectives. The performance of my students on their pre-assessments let me know the areas that I needed to focus more on during my lessons. I planned my instruction to concentrate on content that student may have had problems with understanding. Urban, Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 Suburb, 80 100 100 20 60 100 40 0 100 100 80 100 100 80 20 20 60 40 100 and Rural Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 60 100 80 100 100 100 60 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 80 60 80 100 Long Ago or Today
The analysis of the assessments increased my understanding of individual students performance. The assessments allowed for me to see what my students fully understood after the lesson was taught. I was also able to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of my students understanding of the content. After adjusting my lesson plans and strategies to the needs of my students, I realized that majority of the students performed better on the post-assessments. For those students who did not perform well on the post-assessments, I used a small group to reteach the content. I have attached clearly labeled tables and charts depicting the results of the pre-assessments as well as post-assessments. These tables and Revised Fall 2013 ACEI/NAEYC 2010 Standards
charts allowed for me to find patterns of student performance relative to each objective. The results of both assessments were recorded in the grade book as well as recorded in Power School. The parents of students also received a progress report with the assessments attached. Urban, Suburb, and Rural Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 90 100 100 60 80 100 30 100 100 100 80 90 100 60 30 90 100 90 100 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 60 100 100 40 20 100 90 50 100 100 60 100 100 80 30 90 90 90 100 Long Ago or Today
Scores
Students
Preassessment Postassessment
Scores
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Student 13
Student 10
Student 11
Student 12
Student 14
Student 15
Student 16
Student 17
Student 18
Students
Preassessment Post Assessment
Student 19
Student 1
Student 5
Student 6
Student 7
Student 8
Student 9