()

()

11982 12 3
1983
3 16

()

967
1

2
1983 1984 1985
1990 1992
3
1989 1992

41994 1995 9
2010

5
6
1992

19 2
2012 3 27-36
2011

2011
179-180

2004 4 28 <http://strategy.icxo.com/htmlnews/2004/04/28/207799.htm>
Richard H. K. Vietor

2007
90

12 2012 12 70-82
2

10

11

12

www.cnki.net
1986 2013
2 149
8

6 3 2005
7 175-212
9

Vol.29 No.2 2007 1-3

10

147 2009 12 48-51

11

6 2006 6 108-112
12

7
5 2007 10 23-25
3


13

Ha-Joon Chang

14

Paul Krugman

15

16

the state-centric
approachstate autonomy
state capacities

17Peter Evans

13

14
15

16

17

19 2
2012 3 27-36
Chang, Ha-Joon, Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategies in Historical Perspective
(London: Anthem Press, 2002).
Krugman, Paul, 1986. Introduction: New Thinking about Trade Policy, in Paul Krugman ed.,
Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge, MAMIT Press, 1996),
PP.6-9

2003
15
Evans, Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol eds., Bringing the State Back In (New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1985).
4

embedded autonomy18

custodiandemiurgemidwife
husbandry

19

new structural economics

20

21

18

19

20

21

Peter B. Evans, Embedded Autonomy: States and industrial Transformation (Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, 1995), p.12.
Peter B. Evans, Embedded Autonomy: States and industrial Transformation (Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, 1995), pp.13-14.

-
2012 11
5
97
5

22

23

Douglas Northpath dependence

24

25

1979~2001

26 1980 1990
22

100% 20
154
23

24

Douglas C. North

1994

120

25

26

8
2 2009 1 501-532

2004 11 12~13

17~18
6

27
1994
28

29

1995
12 34 2000 40 30
2001 2000
2700 70%
44% 29.4% 66.7%31

2001

32
2001

2001~2008

1 2003

27

28

29

30

31
32

2 2007 50
1986 3000cc 220% 3000cc
180%
1994 3000cc 150% 3000cc
110%1997 100% 80%

199417
1994 3 12
2002

2003
151
153

2011

2011
6-7
7

2003~2009

M-Benz

Benz

2003
2003
1009

Chrysler

Benz

50%

JEEP

42%

Daimler

2003 7000

Cherokee Grand

2003

Cherokee

10

Bj2020

Chrysler

JEEP

Challenger,

2003

Outlander

Pajero

2003
12961

Dingo

2003
11452

50%

()

29.96%

Freeca,

2003

Lancer

Tranisit

2003
2003

Ford

7469

Ford
Mazda

Ford

50%

Mazda

17.5%

Fiesta
Town Car
Familia,Premacy

2003 5
2003
2003 5

Attenza

2003
13076

Hyundai

50%

Sonatam Elantra

2003 10

(Hyundai)

2003

50%

Pride,Accent

2003 5

BMW

50%

3 Series,5 Series

2003

(Kia)
BMW

BMW

2003 3
Fiat

Fiat

50%

Ibiza,Palio

2003
2003 9

Fiat

Iveco

Iveco

50%
8

Daily

2003 6

Volvo

Toyota

Iveco

50%

2003 8000

Volvo

50%

2003
2003 3000

Volvo

Toyota

Volvo

50%

2003 1500

Volvo

50%

FM Series

2004 2000

Toyota

50%

2004
2010 6
36

Daimler

Daimler

Chrysler

Chrysler

Daimler

50%

2007

2007
Toyota

Hino

Hino

50%

Hino

Daimler

Daimler

Chrysler

Chrysler

Daimler

50%

OM457

2009 1 29

460

2004
2-20
2009 2009 23-37

2004

33 6 2

34
2004 4 24
351. WTO
33

34

35

2004 4
26 < http://auto.sina.com.cn/news/2004-04-06/61275.shtml>
2004 6 2
<http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/shizheng/1024/2541494.html>

200430
2004 4 24
9

2.
3.
4.

2009
2008 2009 3 20

14 10
4
4
4 4
36

37

38 2 1994

2001 1

20%

1994

2002 6

2002 12

2004 1

69%

36

37

38

2009 3 20
<http://www..gov.cn/zwgk/2009-03/20/content_1264324.htm.>
8 9 2010 9
26-55
2013 1 25
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:vgn32GFdG5AJ:big5.ce.cn/gate/big5/au
to.ce. cn/2013autochanle/chanjing/chanjingpinglun/201301/25/t20130125_21326364.shtml
10

2004 2

2004 10
2004

5000

2005 6

2005 8

2007

2005 12

2007 7

2007 12

2009 2

2009 11

2009 12

SAAB

2009

2010 3

VOLVO

2010 7

Mercedes-Benz

2010 8

2010 9

Caterpillar Navista
NC2GLoba LLC

11

2011 4

20

2001~2011

2000

100%39
2001 2010 10
27.1 541.1
20 3
3

2000~2011

39

()

()

2000

7093

523

11.2

24.7

2001

8527

763

16.3

27.1

2002

10520

969

16.6

33.5

2003

26142

2849

54.2

80.2

2004

52796

9335

79.4

124.1

2005

100153

31125

98.8

167.7

2006

163034

93315

192.4

289.0

2007

260311

188638

286.9

412.6

2008

287720

241316

271.9

476.2

2009

177926

102432

254.7

383.5

2010

232081

179940

362.4

541.1

2011

322053

372083

459.5

719.6

2012

2012
334
12

 2007
383
2012
339

1990
50 2000 200 40
2009 1

The International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA)2003~2012

1994 2.7%
1997 90% 1980
40

, 2008/7

2008 7 45
13

 2007
41

16%
7%42ABS
43 4

Delphi Bosch

Denso

Bosch Volkswagen

Volvo

BoschTEVESDELPHITRW

ADVICSAKEBONO MANDO
7 90.66%

Volvo

2010
290~301
2011
41

42

43

7
5 2007 10 23~25
Deloitte

2011
14
2011

2012
333~334
14

 356~366
2011

149~151
2007

44

2003 2010
14 107 498

5
2008 2.07%
3.3%45
3.32%46

2003 2010
:

(A)

(B)

A/B %

2003

107.3

8144.1

1.32

2004

129.5

9134.3

1.42

2005

167.8

10108.4

1.66

2006

244.8

13818.9

1.77

2007

308.8

17201.4

1.80

2008

388.7

19767.0

2.07

2009

460.6

23817.5

1.93

2010

498.8

30762.9

1.62

2004 2011

17%

44

45

46

2012 11 14 <http
www.chinaim.com/new/20121115/642284.html>

2010
23~24
2.6% 6.6%

2011

2011
132
15

 33%
47

48

49
201320657
3.5%A
16850

51

47

48

49

50

51

2006
2 11 <http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hyzg/jjqc/58336.asp >

7
5 2007 10 23-25

2011 10 28
http://www.bwchinese.com/article/1022143.html.

2013
5 2
http://www.ceweekly.cn/html/Article/2013042872783796230774.html.

7 2012 7 109-121
16

1962
1970

52

Giorgio GuigiaroPony 1200cc 1975

1976
6 1977
53

1980
Linsu Kim
catching-up

54Nathan Rosenberg
learning by doing
learning by research55
1986 Excel

20 1991

1.
2.

2000 2006
52

Bae-Gyoon Park, Politics of Scale and the Globalization of the South Korean Automobile
Industry, Economic Geography. vol.79, no. 2, 2003, pp.173-94.
53

2012 2 14
http://overseas.mofat.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/engreadboard.jsp?typeID=16&boa
rdid=10746&seqno=672697&tableName=TYPE_ENGLEGATIO
54
Linsu Kim, Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning:Capability Building in Catching-up at
Hyundai Motor, Organization Science, vol.9, no.4, July/August 1998 , pp. 506-521.
55
Nathan Rosenberg, Inside the Black Box (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp.62-65.
17

 4.9%56reverse direction engineering

57

58

56

57
58

Chung, Ji Yoon, The National Innovation System (NIS) and the Automobile Industry in South
Korea, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 29.
(Karlsruhe: Frauhhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI and Purdue University,
2011). P.4.

18

2012 10 Volkswagen AG
59

1 2

60 2010
Volvo
Volvo

Volvo
61

62
59

60
61

62

???
2012 10 21
http://tw.autos.yahoo.com/auto_information_article2/url/d/a/121021/10/ carnews 2003
2012

2009
197-202
Yane Chandera & Handyanto Widjojo, Value Creation through Acquisition StrategyA study of
Volvos Acquisition by Geely, International Research Journal of Business Studies, vol.5, no.2, 2012,
pp.129-143.
Gary Gereffi, John Humphrey and Timothy Sturgeon, The Governance of Global Value Chains,
Review of International Political Economy, vol.12, no.1, February, 2005, pp.78-104Gary Gereffi
and Karina Fernandez-Stark, Global Value Chain Analysis: A Primer (Durham, NC: Center on
Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness, Duke University, 2011)
19


63

2011
20

64

2008
65

63

64

65

Kaplinsky Morris
Raphael Kaplinsky and Michael Morris, Governance Matters in Value Chains. Developing
Alternatives, vol.9, issue 1, 2003, pp.11-18
2012

2012
27

2013
113-135
20

21

2001~2012

2000 ~2011
2004

2004

2011
2011
2012
2012
2007
Deloitte
2011

North, Douglas C.1994

Vietor, Richard H. K.2007

2003

2012

2013

113-135

2012/12
12 70-82
2012/3
19 2 27-36
2010/9 8
9 26-55
2005/7
6 3 175-212
,2012/7"-
22


7 109-121
2009/12 147
48-51
2007/4
l29 29 1-3
2007/10

7 5 23-25
2009/1-

8 2 501-532

1994/3/12

199417
2004/4/24

200430

Chang, Ha-Joon, 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategies in

Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.
Evans, Peter B., 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation.
Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds., 1985. Bringing the
State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gary Gereffi and Karina Fernandez-Stark, 2011. Global Value Chain Analysis: A
Primer. Durham, NC: Center on Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness,
Duke University.

Krugman, Paul, 1986. Introduction: New Thinking about Trade Policy, in Paul
Krugman ed., Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.1-22.

Chandera, Yane & Handyanto Widjojo, 2012. Value Creation Through Acquisition
StrategyA Study of Volvos Acquisition by Geely, International Research
Journal of Business Studies. Vol.5, No2, pp.129-143.
Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey and Timothy Sturgeon, 2005. The Governance of
Global Value Chains, Review of International Political Economy. Vol.12, No.1,
pp.78-104
Kaplinsky, Raphael and Michael Morris, 2003. Governance Matters in Value
Chains. Developing Alternatives. Vol.9, Issue 1, pp.11-18
Kim, Linsu, 1998. Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability
23

Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor, Organization Science. Vol.9, No. 4,

pp. 506-521.
Park, Bae-Gyoon, 2003. Politics of Scale and the Globalization of the South Korean
Automobile Industry, Economic Geography. Vol.79, No. 2, pp.173-94.
Richard P. Suttmeier, 2005. A New Technonationalism? China and the Development
of Technical Standard, Communications of The ACM. Vol.48, No.4, pp. 35-37
Robert R. Ebert and Mariel Montoney, 2007, Performance of the South Korean
Automobile Industry in the Domestic and United States Market, The
Baldwin-Wallace College Journal of Research and Creative Studies. Vol.1, No.1,
pp. 12-24.
Sturgeon, Timothy J. and Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2011. Global Value Chains in
the Automotive Industry: An Enhanced Role for Developing Countries?
International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development.
Vol.4, Nos.1/2/3, pp.181-204.

Chung, Ji Yoon, 2011. The National Innovation System (NIS) and the Automobile
Industry in South Korea, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems
and Policy Analysis No. 29. Karlsruhe: Frauhhofer Institute for Systems and
Innovation Research ISI and Purdue University.

2007

2008/7
2008 7 44~61

2004

2004 11 12~13

24

The Possibility and Limit of Market for Technology Policy in China:

The Case of Automobile Industry
Pen-chang Lin
(Former Automobile Engineer of DaimlerChrysler Taiwan and Ph. D. Student of
the Graduate Institute of Mainland China Studies and Dr. Sun Yet-sens Thoughts,
Chinese Culture University)

Chien-kuo Pang
(Professor, the Graduate Institute of Mainland China Studies and Dr. Sun Yat-sens Thoughts,
Chinese Culture University)

Abstract
The industrial policy of market for technology has long been carried out in
China for the development of automobile industry. The policy has promoted
significantly the ability of manufacturing low and middle level components in China.
The joint venture state-owned enterprises, however, have not been able to get core
technology from foreign partners and build up automobile industrial chain fully
independent. Practical experience shows that local automobile industry cannot reach
independent development simply in terms of technology transfer. Development of
automobile industry in China has to transcend the path of market for technology.
Chinese government should formulate appropriate policy to reduce the dependence on
foreign enterprises, overcome technological barriers and open up the territory of
independent development.
Keywords: market for technology, industrial policy, technology transfer, core
technology, independent development

25