Professional Documents
Culture Documents
149
.
.
.
.
LAMINAR NATURAL CONVECTION FROM
AN ISOFLUX DISCRETE HEATER
IN A VERTICAL CAVITY
A.M. Al-Bahi
Aeronautical Engineering Department
A.M. Radhwan and G.M. Zaki *
Thermal Engineering Department
King Abdulaziz University
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
*Address for Correspondence:
King Abdulaziz University
P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21587
Saudi Arabia
e-mail: gzaki@kaau.edu.sa
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
150 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. December 2002
ABSTRACT
Laminar natural convection heat transfer in an air filled vertical square cavity
differentially heated with a single isoflux discrete heater on one wall with top and
bottom adiabatic surfaces is numerically studied. The coupled unsteady two-
dimensional conservation equations are solved by employing a forward time central
space implicit finite difference scheme. Numerical results reveal that the local Nusselt
number decreases along the length of the heater at constant value of the modified
Rayleigh number (Ra*) with slight enhancement near the trailing edge. The heater
location for the maximum heat dissipation rate is Rayleigh number dependent, which is
in agreement with previous experimental and numerical results. A correlation for this
location is obtained in addition to a relation for the dependence of the average Nusselt
number on the modified Rayleigh number and the location parameter (s/L). Average
Nusselt number variation for s/L = 0.25 to 0.75 and Ra* =10
3
to 10
6
is presented and
compared to the available correlations for full contact and discretely heated enclosures.
Keywords: natural convection, square enclosure, discrete, laminar
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
December 2002 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. 151
LAMINAR NATURAL CONVECTION FROM AN ISOFLUX DISCRETE HEATER
IN A VERTICAL CAVITY
1. INTRODUCTION
Natural convection in differentially heated enclosures plays an important role in many engineering applications, where
it provides a means of heat transfer without the need for fans or pumps. Cooling of electronic chips [1], ventilation of
buildings [2], thermal performance of solar collectors [3], and geophysics [4] are just some examples for engineering
applications where basically a cavity is differentially heated. The recent advances in electronic circuit technology as well
as the development of large integrated chips with increased heat dissipation rates made heat transfer a key factor in
circuit board design. Cooling of these boards is fundamentally addressed as convective heat transfer in enclosures [5, 6]
and has been extensively studied for the past two decades. These studies focus on the thermoconvection performance
within a cavity filled with a fluid and asymmetrically heated for different geometrical parameters (aspect ratio), fluid
properties (Prandtl number), heating mode (isoflux or isothermal), and a selected set of boundary conditions. The two-
dimensional convection within a square cavity heated on one vertical side and cooled on the opposite side [79] is
currently considered a reference or bench-mark solution for verifying other solution procedures. The problem has been
extended to establish additional bench-mark solutions for fluids with temperature dependent viscosity [10], fluids with
heat generation [11], and time dependent wall functions [12, 13].
Practically, Rayleigh number and geometric features characterize the heat transfer problem in cavities. Correlations in
simple power-law form have been developed, but the constants showed dependency on the method and accuracy of
solution. In Table 1 the correlation constants from Henkes and Hoogendoorn [14], Markatos and Pericleous [8], and
Barakos et al. [9] are presented along with their validity ranges. The importance of the convection phenomena in cavities
is revealed by the abundant studies reviewed by Ostrach [15] and Yang [16]. Studies of more relevance to circuit board
cooling are characterized by heating over a segment of the wall and referred to as discrete heating. The work of
Chu et al. [17] is one of the early contributions, where the temperature and velocity fields were computed for a range of
different parameters (aspect ratio from 0.4 to 5, l/W = 0.2 to 1 and Ra
L
10
5
). Though data was limited to isothermal
heating, the complex dependence of Nusselt number on Rayleigh number and other parameters apparently rules out
obtaining general correlations suitable for design. For example, the heater location for the maximum heat transfer rates
shifts towards the bottom of the enclosure as Rayleigh number increases. This effect is attributed to the large space
available for flow circulation when the heater is located close to the bottom. This circulation effect is more pronounced
at high Rayleigh number, Ra = 10
5
[17], and is confirmed by the experimental results of Turner and Flack [18] and for an
isothermal heater mounted on an isothermal heat sink, Radhwan and Zaki [19].
The effect of the discrete heater location has also been investigated for a single isoflux and isothermal heater, Refai
and Yovanovich [20, 21], for two dual heaters Chadwick et al. [22] and for multiple heaters, Keyhani et al. [23]. The
effect of the aspect ratio Ar on the heat transfer rate has also been studied. The results of Chu et al. [17], for Ar = 0.45,
showed that Nusselt number generally decreases for wide enclosures at constant Rayleigh number. This trend was
insignificant as reported by Sernas and Lee [24] for aspect ratios between 0.4 and 1. Although two-dimensional
convection has been investigated numerically and experimentally, development of a correlation that combines the basic
parameters (heater size, location, aspect ratio, and Rayleigh number) is a challenging problem because of the complex
parametric interdependency and the arbitrary choice of the characteristic length in both Rayleigh and Nusselt numbers.
The distance from the bottom of the enclosure [23], the width of the heater [25], the distance from the leading edge of
the discrete heater [22], and (l/Ar) [20, 21] are just examples.
Therefore, it is uncertain to interpret or extrapolate data and/or correlations of different investigators. The correlations
developed on basis of two-dimensional convection in cavities are summarized in Table 1 along with their validity range.
The preceding studies focus on two-dimensional convection flow in cavities with asymmetric discrete heating. Though
three-dimensional convection received less attention a few correlations are available [2628].
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
152 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. December 2002
Table 1. Convection Correlations for Full Contact and Discretely Heated Enclosures.
Author [Ref] Study Configuration Heat transfer correlation Range of parameters
A
1
Square enclosure,
isothermal, full contact
heated wall at T
h
and
opposite wall at T
c
b
L
L
Nu a Ra = Ar = 1
Pr = 0.71
a b
Markatos and
Pericleous [8]
0.143 0.299 10
3
Ra
L
10
6
Henkes &
Hoogendooren [14]
0.304 0.25 10
3
Ra
L
10
6
Barakos et al. [9] 0.301 0.25 10
3
Ra
L
10
11
Turner and Flack [18] E Rectangular enclosure,
single and dual
isothermal heaters
Nu
L
= c
1
Gr
L
c2
l/L c
1
c
2
0.125 0.45 0.33
0.25 0.069 0.32
0.5 0.097 0.31
Ar = 1,
s/L = 0.5
510
6
Gr L 910
6
Pr = 0.71
Refai and Yovanovich
[20, 21]
A Rectangular enclosure,
isoflux or isothermal
single discrete heater,
results for L=W only
isoflux heater
2
Nu
l
= [
1.511
(
1.294
)
m
+ {0.21
0.288
(Ra*)
0.221
[1.261(0.7)
n
0.012
]
n
}
8.5
]
0.118
m = 0 for heater at the center
m = 1 for top or bottom positions
= l/L
l = (lW/L)
0 Ra*
l
< 10
6
4
n = 0 for 0.5 1
n = 1 for = 0.25
Pr = 0.72
Chadwick et al. [22] A&E Rectangular enclosure,
single and dual isoflux
heaters
2
1
c
y y
Nu c Gr
=
s/L c
1
c
2
0.2 0.526 0.192
0.5 0.454 0.199
0.8 0.438 0.193
Ar = 5
l/L = 5
0 .13310
4
< Gr
y
510
5
y measured from the
leading edge of the heater
Keyhani et al. [23] E 11 discrete isoflux
heaters mounted on an
adiabatic wall.
Nu
y
= 1.009 Ra
y
*
0.1805
Ar = 16.5
Pr ~150
6 12
* 10 5 10
y
Ra x < <
Ho and Chang [25] A&E Rectangular enclosure,
four isoflux discrete
heaters
w
Nu =
i i
* b c
i w
a Ra Ar
w = width of the enclosure
a
i
, b
i
, c
i
, see [25] Table 2
Ar = 110
Ra*
w
= 10
4
10
6
Pr = 0.71
1
A: Analytical or numerical study, E: Experimental
2
Another correlation is available for isothermal surfaces [21]
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
December 2002 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. 153
The objective of the present paper is to study the dependency of the heat transfer performance on the heater location
for a reference case of a single isoflux discrete heater in a square enclosure and to correlate the results. The effect of
location on the spatial Nusselt number variation along the vertical heat sink is also studied. The time-dependent two-
dimensional mass, momentum and energy conservation equations are solved numerically. Second order implicit finite
difference approximation with alternate direction scheme (ADI) is employed to solve the unsteady state equations.
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
The configuration under consideration is shown schematically in Figure 1. It is an enclosure of height L and width W
(aspect ratio Ar = L/W). The horizontal surfaces are assumed adiabatic while the vertical right wall is a heat sink at a
constant temperature T
c
.
Figure 1. Schematic of enclosure configuration and the solution grid.
The left vertical wall has a discrete flush-mounted heater of length l, at a distance s from its center to the bottom of the
cavity. The heater represents a local isoflux heat source, while the remainder of the wall is adiabatic. The fluid inside the
enclosure is assumed Newtonian and incompressible with constant properties except for the density in the buoyancy term
of the Y momentum equation (Boussinesq approximation). For two dimensional laminar free convection flow, by
eliminating the pressure between the X and Y momentum equations (by cross differentiation) the mass, momentum, and
energy equations are presented in the dimensionless stream function, vorticity, and energy formulation as:
2 2
2 2
X Y
+ =
(1)
2 2
2 2
*
Pr
Ra
U V
X Y X X Y
+ + = + +
(2)
2 2
2 2
1
Pr
U V
X Y X Y
| |
+ + = +
|
|
\ .
. (3)
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
154 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. December 2002
The initial and boundary conditions are:
initial conditions:
At = 0, 0 X 1, 0 Y 1
U = V = 0, = 0, = 0
adiabatic horizontal surfaces:
at 0 < X < 1, Y = 0 and Y = 1
U = V = 0,
Y
= 0, = 0
isothermal wall:
at 0 Y 1, X = W/L = 1/Ar
U = V = 0, = 0, = 0
heat source wall:
at (s l/2)/L Y (s + l/2)/L, X = 0
U = V = 0,
X
= 1, = 0
and at 0 Y < (s l/2)/L, (s + l/2)/L < Y 1 and X = 0
U = V = 0,
X
= 0, = 0
The dimensionless variables are defined in the nomenclature. The modified Rayleigh and Nusselt numbers are based
on the enclosure width W, for a square enclosure (Ar = 1)W = L.
The local heat transfer rate is obtained from the energy balance on the heater section and along the cold isothermal
wall, from which Nusselt numbers are:
0
h
X=
qL 1
Nu =
k T
=
l
1
Y l
2
. (4)
Local Nusselt number at the isothermal wall is:
1
c
X=
Nu
X
0 Y 1. (5)
The average Nusselt number along the discrete heater length is:
h
qL
Nu
k T
=
. (6)
A forward time central space implicit finite difference scheme is used to solve the governing equations. The numerical
solution is obtained by employing a stabilizing correction splitting method to improve convergence. This splitting (ADI)
scheme has been extensively used in its original form, Peaceman and Rachford [29] and in its generalized form [3032].
The governing equations were discretized on a nonuniform 4141 grid (Figure 1), in which the mesh is finer near the
vertical walls to better resolve the hydrodynamic and thermal boundary layers there. The computation of the stream
function, the temperature, and the vorticity were carried out using second order difference approximations. Central
difference relations were used for the diffusion terms of the vorticity transport equation, while the convective term was
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
December 2002 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. 155
presented by an upwind difference scheme [33]. No slip boundary conditions were imposed to solve the stream function
equation. A second order central difference approximation was used to obtain the second derivatives of the stream
function at the boundaries, which are necessary to have an acceptable solution of the vorticity equation. The values of
outside the computational domain (image points) were calculated using Taylor second order expansion. In particular for
equal nodes grid this technique leads to Koskova condition [34]. The steady state solution was obtained as the limit of
the transient calculations. The stream function equation, which is highly coupled with the vorticity equation, was
satisfied for every time step applying an iterative procedure. Five iterations were found to be sufficient for a
dimensionless time step of 510
4
. The criterion for convergence was examined for each variable through the normalized
residual R, such that:
1
, ,
,
,
,
Max
Max
n n
i j i j
i j
n
i j
i j
R
+
, (7)
where is any variable (, , or ) and
c
density at T
c
, kg m
3
dummy variable
non-dimensional stream function =
d
/
non-dimensional vorticity =
d
L
2
/
non-dimensional time,= t/L
2
Subscripts
c cold surface
d dimensional
h hot surface
L based on enclosure length
Superscripts
average value
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
December 2002 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. 163
REFERENCES
[1] S. Sathe and B. Sammakia, A Review of Recent Developments in Some Practical Aspects of Air-cooled Electronic Packages,
Journal of Heat Transfer, 120 (1998), pp 830838.
[2] R.K. Caby, A.E. Holdo, and G.P. Hammond, Natural Convection Heat Transfer Rates in Enclosures, Energy and Buildings,
27(2) (1998), pp 137146.
[3] H. Buchberg, I. Catton, and D.K. Edwards, Natural Convection in Enclosed Spaces A Review of Application to Solar
Energy, Journal of Heat Transfer, 98 (1976), pp. 182188.
[4] R. Missner and U. Mller, A Numerical Investigation of Three-Dimensional Magneto-Convection in Rectangular Cavities,
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 42 (1999), pp. 11111121.
[5] C.T. William and A. Hiroyuki, Advances in Electronic Packaging, Proceedings of the ASME/JSME Conference, New York,
1992.
[6] F.P. Incropera, Convection Heat Transfer in Electronic Equipment Cooling, Journal of Heat Transfer, 110 (1988),
pp. 10971111.
[7] G. de Vahl Davis, Natural Convection of Air in a Square Cavity: A Bench-Mark Numerical Solution, International Journal of
Numerical Methods in Fluids, 3 (1983), pp. 249264.
[8] N.C. Markatos and K.A. Pericleous, Laminar and Turbulent Natural Convection in an Enclosure Cavity, International Journal
of Heat and Mass Transfer, 27 (1984), pp. 755772.
[9] G. Barakos, E Mitsoulis, and D. Assimacopoulos, Natural Convection Flow in a Square Cavity, Revisited: Laminar and
Turbulent Models with Wall Functions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 18 (1994), pp. 695719.
[10] R.J Cochran and R.E. Roy, Comparison of Computational Results for Natural Convection in a Square Enclosure with Variable
Viscosity, Bench-Mark Problem, Proceedings of the 1995 ASME Cong. Part 1, 1995, pp. 11121117.
[11] M.M. El-Refaee, M.M. El-Sayed, N.M. Alnajem, and I.E. Megahid, Steady State Solutions of Buoyancy-Assisted Internal
Flows Using a Fast False Implicit Transient Scheme (FITS), J. Num. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 6 (1996), pp. 323.
[12] M. Kazmierczak, Buoyancy Driven Flow in an Enclosure with Time Periodic Boundary Conditions, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer, 35 (1992), pp. 15071519.
[13] Q. Xia, K.T. Yang, and D. Mukutmoni, Effect of Imposed Wall Temperature Oscillations on the Stability of Natural
Convection in a Square Enclosure, Journal of Heat Transfer, 117 (1995), pp. 113120.
[14] W.M. Henkes and C.J. Hoogendoorn, Scaling of the Laminar-Natural Convection Flow in a Heated Square Cavity,
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 11 (1993), pp. 9132925.
[15] S. Ostrach, Natural Convection in Enclosures, Journal of Heat Transfer, 110 (1988), pp. 11751190.
[16] K.T. Yang, Natural Convection in Enclosures, in: Handbook of Single-Phase Convective Heat Transfer, ch. 13. ed. S. Kakac,
R. Shah, and W. Aung. New York: Wiley, 1987.
[17] H.H. Chu, S.W. Churchill, and C.V.P. Patterson, The Effect of Heater Size, Location, Aspect Ratio and Boundary Conditions
on Two Dimensional Laminar Natural Convection in Rectangular Channels, Journal of Heat Transfer, 98(2) (1976),
pp. 194201.
[18] B.L. Turner and R.D. Flack, The Experimental Measurement of Natural Convective Heat Transfer in Rectangular Enclosure
with Concentrated Energy Sources, Journal of Heat Transfer, 102 (1980), pp. 236241.
[19] A. Radhwan and G.M. Zaki, Laminar Convection in a Square Enclosure with Discrete Heating of Vertical Walls, Journal of
Engineering Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 12 (1999), pp. 7077.
[20] G. Refai and M.M. Yovanovich, Numerical Study of Natural Convection from Discrete Heat Sources in a Vertical Square
Enclosure, AIAA, 28th Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1990, paper No.90-0256.
[21] G.A. Refai and M.M. Yovanovich, Influence of Discrete Heat Source Location on Natural Convection Heat Transfer in a
Vertical Square Enclosure, Journal of Electronic Packaging, 113 (1991), pp. 268274.
[22] M.L. Chadwick, B.W. Webb, and H.S. Heaton, Natural Convection from Two-dimensional Discrete Heat Sources in a
Rectangular Enclosure, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 34(7) (1991), pp. 16791693.
[23] M. Keyhani, V. Prasad, and R. Cox, An Experimental Study of Natural Convection in a Vertical Cavity with Discrete Heat
Sources, Journal of Heat Transfer, 110 (1988), pp. 616624.
[24] V. Sernas and E.I. Lee, Heat Transfer in Air Enclosures of Aspect Ratio Less Than One, ASME Winter Annual Meeting,
San Francisco, California, 1978, ASME paper 78-WA/HT-7.
[25] C.J. Ho and J.Y. Chang, A Study of Natural Convection Heat Transfer in a Vertical Rectangular Enclosure with Two-
Dimensional Heating: Effect of Aspect Ratio, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 37(6) (1994), pp. 917925.
A.M. Al-Bahi, A.M. Radhwan, and G.M. Zaki
164 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 27, Number 2C. December 2002
[26] T.J. Heindel, S. Ramadhyani, and F.P. Incropera, Laminar Natural Convection in Discretely Heated Cavity: I. Assessment of
Three-Dimensional Effects, Journal of Heat Transfer, 117 (1995), pp. 902909.
[27] T.J. Heindel, S. Ramadhyani, and F.P. Incropera, Laminar Natural Convection in a Discretely Heated Cavity: II. Comparisons
of Experimental and Theoretical Results, Journal of Heat Transfer, 117 (1995), pp. 910917.
[28] K.A. Park and A.E. Bergles, Natural Convection Heat Transfer Characteristics of Simulated Microelectronic Chips, Journal
of Heat Transfer, 109 (1987), pp. 9096.
[29] D.W. Peaceman and H.H. Rachford, The Numerical Solution of Parabolic and Elliptic Equations, Journal of the Society of
Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 3 (1955), pp. 2835.
[30] M.M. Abdelrahman and A.M. Al-Bahi, Numerical Solution of the Unsteady Incompressible, Navier-Stokes Equations in
Generalized Non-Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sci., 41(2) (1996), pp. 419434.
[31] A.M. Al-Bahi and M.M. Abdelrahman, On the Solution of Unsteady Viscous Incompressible Flow Problems, 34th Aerospace
Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1996, AIAA-Paper 96-0826.
[32] J. Douglas and J.E. Gunn, A General Formulation of Alternating Direction Method, Part I, Parabolic and Hyperbolic
Problems, Numerical Mathematics, 6 (1994), pp. 428453.
[33] W. Shyy, S. Thakur, and J. Wright, Second-Order Upwind and Central Difference Schemes for Recirculating Flow
Computation, Journal of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 30(4) (1992), pp. 923932.
[34] E.F. Nogotov, Applications of Numerical Heat Transfer. New York: Mc-Graw Hill, 1976, pp. 100109.
Paper Received 3 February 2002; Revised 25 June 2002; Accepted 23 October 2002.