NaI(1|) Detector W|th a Mu|t|channe| Ana|yzer NUC L 4S0 Author: 1ay|or h|pps Lab artners: atr|ck koudys 8ronson kesh Lab erformed: 3]18]14 Due Date: 4]1]14 Date Subm|tted: 4]1]14
Summary: We demonsLraLed Lhe use of a MulLlchannel Analyzer connecLed Lo a nal(1l) gamma-ray deLecLor uslng gamma-ray specLroscopy. We used Lhe followlng lsoLopes Lo callbraLe Lhe sysLem: barlum- 133, ceslum- 137, and cobalL-60. uslng Lhese callbraLlons, we were able Lo deLermlne an unknown radlonucllde glven Lo us ln Lhe lab by comparlng Lhe values of Lhe phoLopeaks uslng Lhe Camma Lnergles for lsoLopes". We sLarLed callbraLlng Lhe Cenle-2000 sofLware uslng Lhe ceslum-137 where we placed lL ln Lhe shelf box and recorded and observed Lhe specLral daLa. lor Lhe energy callbraLlon, we sLarLed wlLh cobalL-60 and Lhen replaced lL wlLh ceslum-137 and furLher replaced LhaL wlLh barlum-133 ln Lhe shelf box. AfLer collecLlng all of Lhls daLa, we found Lhe reglons of lnLeresL (8Cls) of every slgnlflcanL phoLopeak. WlLh Lhe 8Cl daLa, we were able Lo deLermlne Lhe peak cenLrold, lWPM, lW1M, and area under Lhe 8Cl. We were able Lo flnd Lhe comblned specLrum of Lhese Lhree sources wlLh all of Lhe ma[or peaks vlslble.
Introduct|on: We were able Lo analyze Lhe dlfferenL energy pulses of dlfferenL radlo-nuclldes across a specLrum ln Lhls experlmenL uslng a MulLlchannel Analyzer, a nal(1l) deLecLor and a nlM 8ln. 1he MCA enables for auLomaLlc sorLlng and dlsplay of pulses. 8arlum- 133, ceslum-137, and cobalL-60 were all used Lo help callbraLe Lhe sysLem and from Lhls callbraLlon, we were able Lo verlfy an unknown radlonucllde. 1he MCA ls very effecLlve ln flndlng and sorLlng pulses, an advanLage noL shared by Lhe SCA. 1he cosL and effecLlveness of a MCA vs. a SCA ls evldenL and wlll be shown LhroughouL Lhls lab.
1heory: An MCA measures pulse helghLs across a specLrum, asslgnlng Lhese helghLs Lo one of many ranges or, ln Lhls case, channels. Cn Lhe oLher hand, an SCA produces a pulse only lf Lhe lnpuL llnear pulse ampllLude lles beLween Lhe upper level dlscrlmlnaLor and lower level dlscrlmlnaLor. ulfferenL feaLures on Lhe specLrum are: phoLopeak, x-ray peaks, annlhllaLlon peaks, slngle and double escape peaks, CompLon shoulder and CompLon conLlnuum, backscaLLer peaks, and sum peaks. 1hese peaks are very apparenL when looklng aL a good specLrum from a radloacLlve source. 1he phoLopeak ls formed when a gamma ray deposlLs all of lLs energy ln Lhe deLecLor, commonly occurrlng when Lhe gamma ray lnLeracLs Lhrough Lhe phoLoelecLrlc effecL. x-ray peaks occur when phoLoelecLrlc absorpLlon Lakes place ln a maLerlal surroundlng Lhe deLecLor and a characLerlsLlc x-ray ls emlLLed lnLo Lhe deLecLor. AnnlhllaLlon peaks happen ln Lhe surroundlng maLerlal when palr producLlon causes an annlhllaLed phoLon Lo enLer Lhe deLecLor. Slngle and double escape peaks correspond Lo elLher a slngle or double phoLon escaplng Lhe deLecLor from palr producLlon. 1he CompLon edge ls a sudden drop aL Lhe end of Lhe CompLon conLlnuum, Lhls CompLon conLlnuum ls a measuremenL of Lhe blndlng energy of an elecLron ln a u- shaped fashlon. 1he backscaLLer peak ls due Lo CompLon scaLLerlng ln Lhe surroundlng maLerlal. llnally, sum peaks are Lhe summaLlon of Lwo lndlvldual gamma ray energles. 1he lab manual covers some of Lhe above Lhe maLerlal, Lhe resL can be found wlLhln Lhe LexLbook for Lhe course: knoll, C., 8adlaLlon ueLecLlon and MeasuremenL 4 Lh LdlLlon, !ohn Wlley and Sons, 2010.
Lqu|pment: Looklng aL llgure 1, below, lL shows Lhe equlpmenL seL up of Lhe lab. Plgh volLage cables were needed wlLh Lhe hlgh volLage supply, as Lhe name suggesLs. 1able 1 glves a llsL of Lhe equlpmenL used Lo analyze our daLa.
rocedure: 1he procedure for Lhls experlmenL followed Lhe Sprlng 2014 LxperlmenL 6 LaboraLory Manual, wlLh no excepLlons: parL l was Laken a second Llme for a more accuraLe callbraLlon as our galn was Loo hlgh ln our lnlLlal measuremenLs.
Data (kesu|ts): arL u Ceslum-137
n|stogram for Ces|um-137 k-kay eak w|th 900 h|gh vo|tage and a course ga|n set to 30. I|gure 2: n|stogram for Ces|um-137 k-kay eak 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 30 32 34 36 38 60 62 64 66 L n e r g y
Channels x-8ay eak
n|stogram for Ces|um-137 Iu|| Lnergy eak w|th 900 h|gh vo|tage and a course ga|n set to 30. I|gure 3: n|stogram for Ces|um-137 Iu|| Lnergy eak arL l Lnergy CallbraLlon 900 Plgh volLage Course Caln 30
Channels Ceslum-137 (eak 1) arL C unknown 8adlonuclldes
n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 1 w|th 900 h|gh vo|tage and a course ga|n set to 30. I|gure 8: n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 1
n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 2 w|th 900 h|gh vo|tage and a course ga|n set to 30. I|gure 9: n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 2
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 3000 6000 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 130 132 134 136 138 160 162 164 L n e r g y
Channels 8Cl 1 0 100 200 300 400 300 600 700 329 332 333 338 341 344 347 330 333 336 339 362 363 368 371 374 377 380 383 L n e r g y
Channels 8Cl 2
n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 3 w|th 900 h|gh vo|tage and a course ga|n set to 30. I|gure 10: n|stogram for Unknown kad|onuc||de kCI 3
D|scuss|on of kesu|ts: 1. uescrlbe Lhe effecLs on Lhe ceslum-137 specLrum caused by varylng Lhe varlous MCA conLrols, galn, and Lhe hlgh volLage seLLlngs, (SecLlon u, SLep 3) A: When Lhe galn was lncreased, we were able Lo see an lncrease ln Lhe acLlvlLy specLrum among more channels, however, lf Lhe galn was lncreased Loo much, Lhe acLlvlLy peaks would noL be able Lo been seen because Lhey were pasL Lhe channel scale. lncreaslng Lhe hlgh volLage had a slmllar effecL, Lhe acLlvlLy among Lhe channels was on average hlgher wlLh an lncrease ln hlgh volLage. 2. uslng Lhe ceslum-137 specLrum daLa, produced ln SecLlon u and prlnLed ouL ln SecLlon L, evaluaLe Lhe nal(1l) deLecLor used ln your experlmenL. lnclude ln Lhls evaluaLlon Lhe deLecLor resoluLlon, peak symmeLry, and peak-Lo-CompLon raLlo. Pow do your resulLs agree wlLh Lhose obLalned ln LxperlmenL 3 and wlLh Lhe LheoreLlcal values? A: ueLecLor 8esoluLlon = (96.863-31.342)/1037=4.38 eak SymmeLry=lW1M/lWPM=96.863/31.342=1.8866 eak-Lo-CompLon 8aLlo= PelghL of 137 Cs hoLo-peak/Max helghL of CompLon= 3.373 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 467 470 473 476 479 482 483 488 491 494 497 300 303 306 309 312 313 318 321 324 L n e r g y
Channels 8Cl 3 Cur deLecLor resoluLlon for experlmenL 3 was 6.23 and for Lhls experlmenL lL was 4.38 and Lhe LheoreLlcal value was 7-8, Lhls shows LhaL our resoluLlon for Lhls experlmenL was far beLLer Lhan Lhe pasL experlmenL due Lo callbraLlon errors and human error. lor our peak symmeLry, we calculaLed lL Lo be 1.8866, lab 3 was calculaLed Lo be 2.667. 1hese resulLs do noL agree wlLh one anoLher because our callbraLlons from Lhe sLarL were off and we dld noL noLlce Lhem Llll Lhe end because our galn was Loo hlgh. lor our peak-Lo-compLon raLlo we calculaLed lL Lo be 3.373 and for lab 3 lL was calculaLed Lo be 6.214. Agaln our callbraLlons were off due Lo havlng our galn Loo hlgh, maklng our peaks show ln dlfferenL spoLs aL dlfferenL acLlvlLy raLes, or noL showlng aL all. 3. uslng elLher Lhe ceslum-137 peak daLa obLalned ln SecLlon u or one of Lhe or cobalL-60 peaks obLalned ln SecLlon l, use Lhe procedures glven ln class Lo calculaLe peak cenLrold locaLlon, gross and neL peak areas and Lhelr sLandard errors, lWPM and lW1M and peak symmeLry. Pow well do your values compare wlLh Lhose obLalned by Lhe Cenle 2000 program for Lhese values? Lxplaln any dlfferences. A: 4. uslng Lhe peak channel cenLrold daLa deLermlned ln SecLlon l and acLual peak energles, evaluaLe Lhe accuracy of energy callbraLlon curve obLalned ln secLlon l. 1hls requlres you Lo flL a curve or llne Lo your daLa.
Source Channel kev (calculaLed) AcLual Lrror 8arlum 26 1220 336 242.6966292 Ceslum 188 3606 661.637 444.9933677 CobalL (1) 326 3684 1173 214.0664962 CobalL (2) 369 3700 1333 177.3693923 y = 6.9722x + 1468.1 8 = 0.7796 0 300 1000 1300 2000 2300 3000 3300 4000 4300 0 30 100 130 200 230 300 330 400 L n e r g y
( k e V )
Channe|s Ca||branon Curve Chart Serles1 Cur percenL errors are so far off due Lo our callbraLlon noL belng accuraLe and obLalnlng dlfferenL channels Lhan we were suppose Lo have obLalned. 3. ldenLlfy, by uslng a Lable, all Lhe specLral feaLures ln Lhe ceslum-137 from secLlon u, and Lhe callbraLlon specLrum (SecLlon l). lnclude such lLems, lf seen, as full energy peaks, escape peaks, backscaLLer peaks, CompLon conLlnuums, annlhllaLlon peaks, and sum peaks, eLc. uo Lhelr shapes and approxlmaLe energy or channel locaLlons agree wlLh Lhe Lheory glven ln class? use a separaLe Lable for Lhls lnsLead of marklng your Cenle 2000 generaLed graphs or daLa Lables.
A: ?es Lhe shapes are slmllar buL due Lo our callbraLlon belng off, we had Lo re-perform Lhe callbraLlon secLlon aL Lhe end of lab. 8ecause of shorLness of Llme, however, we were noL able Lo perform Lhe measuremenLs for Lhe full Llme Lo achleve Lhe esLlmaLed counLs. 1hls posed as a problem because we are noL able Lo see all of Lhe specLral feaLures LhaL should be shown. 1here should be escape peaks ln fronL of Lhe cobalL peaks buL Lhere are noL apparenL due Lo Lhe callbraLlon. Also, before Lhe peak ln 8a- 133 Lhere should be sum peaks along wlLh an x-ray peak. 6. WhaL was (were) your unknown radlonucllde(s)? Pow were Lhe ldenLlflcaLlons esLabllshed? Pow well dld Lhe callbraLlon energles agree wlLh Lhe acLual peak energles? Lxplaln any dlscrepancles ln Lhese values. A: We had source 3 for our unknown and found Lwo dlfferenL radlonucllde(s) ln Lhe source. llrsL unknown LhaL we dlscovered was Cs-137 because of Lhe phoLopeak seen ln Lhe mlddle-lower range of Lhe specLrum. We also found Co-60 ln our unknown due Lo Lhe Lwo dlsLlncL peaks found ln Lhe mld range of Lhe specLrum. We Look our daLa and found exacLly whaL Lhe source was uslng kaerl (webslLe glven by Lhe professors) by analyzlng Lhe peak energles found and comparlng Lhe energles of gamma-ray emlsslons.
SpecLral leaLures Channel 8ange lull Lnergy eak 1 lor Ceslum (171-201) lull Lnergy eak 1 lor CobalL (311-341) lull Lnergy eak 2 lor CobalL (331-373) lull Lnergy eak 1 lor 8arlum (24-28) CompLon ConLlnuum (127-136) 8ackScaLLer eak (83-91) 8ackScaLLer eak (19-22) x-8ay eak (12-13) Conc|us|on AfLer Lhe compleLlon of Lhe Camma-8ay SpecLroscopy uslng a nal(1l) ueLecLor WlLh a MulLlchannel Analyzer lab we were able Lo deLermlne how Lhe dlfferenL specLra are lald ouL over dlfferenL energles or dlfferenL channels. When Lransferrlng Lhe daLa Lo an Lxcel spreadsheeL, lL was easy Lo lsolaLe Lhe 8Cls and use Lhls lnformaLlon Lo deLermlne all Lhe polnLs needed for calculaLlons and deLermlnaLlons of unknown lsoLopes. A MulLlchannel Analyzer ls a very useful Lool for measurlng peak energles ln con[uncLlon wlLh a nal(1l) deLecLor.
Suggest|ons for Iuture Work Cne suggesLlon l could Lhlnk of was LhaL ln some of Lhe sLeps where we were supposed Lo record daLa such as Lhe lWPM, noLhlng was sald abouL recordlng Lhe energles assoclaLed wlLh Lhe peaks, whlch Lurned ouL Lo be relevanL Lo Lhe calculaLlons.