This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by petitioner Lin Doe's counsel for her case seeking a judicial declaration of nullity of her marriage to respondent Roy Doe. The brief summarizes that Doe seeks to annul the marriage because Doe had an existing marriage prior to marrying petitioner. It lists stipulated facts regarding their marriage and child, issues to be resolved, documents and witnesses to be presented, and counsel's availability for trial dates.
This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by petitioner Lin Doe's counsel for her case seeking a judicial declaration of nullity of her marriage to respondent Roy Doe. The brief summarizes that Doe seeks to annul the marriage because Doe had an existing marriage prior to marrying petitioner. It lists stipulated facts regarding their marriage and child, issues to be resolved, documents and witnesses to be presented, and counsel's availability for trial dates.
This document is a pre-trial brief submitted by petitioner Lin Doe's counsel for her case seeking a judicial declaration of nullity of her marriage to respondent Roy Doe. The brief summarizes that Doe seeks to annul the marriage because Doe had an existing marriage prior to marrying petitioner. It lists stipulated facts regarding their marriage and child, issues to be resolved, documents and witnesses to be presented, and counsel's availability for trial dates.
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT DESIGNATED FAMILY COURT BRANCH 36
Lin Doe Petitioner,
-versus-
Roy Doe Respondent. Civil Case No. 06-10 For: Judicial Declaration of Nullity of Marriage
PRE TRIAL BRIEF
Petitioner, by and through the undersigned counsel most respectfully submits this pre-trial brief:
POSSIBILITY OF AMICABLE SETTLEMENT The Petitioner is ready, willing and able to submit this case to any alternative mode of dispute settlement and likewise she is willing to settle this case amicably only to the extent of the amount of support.
STIPULATION OF FACTS 1. That before Petitioner and Respondent got married in 2002, the latter introduced a certain Reymous Fernandez Doe, a seven year old child then, to the former as his child out of wedlock. The child is using the surname of the respondent even he is illegitimate because he was adopted by the respondents parents.
2. That Plaintiff and Respondent were married on August 14, 2002 at Max Restaurant, Pansol, Calamba, Laguna solemnized by Pastor Levy M. Erasga of the Church of God. Doe v. Doe Civil Case No. 06-10 For Judicial Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Page 2 of 4
3. That Mark Gabriel Doe, born in January 26, 2003, is their only child.
4. That is the course of their marriage, petitioner was bothered by respondents relatives that she is already the second wife of the respondent. Petitioner went to the National Statistics Office to check the allegation of the respondents relatives and she discovered that the respondent has a subsisting marriage with Grace B. Dela Cruz which was solemnized on May 31, 1995 at Bayambang, Pangasinan by Rev. Ernesto S. De Vera of the United Church of Christ.
5. That petitioner and respondent separated on May 2006. Petitioner continued to stay in Laguna while respondent moved back to Makati. Respondent occasionally visit their child but did not leave any financial support since then.
6. That their only child will now start going to school and the petitioner is only earning more or less P15,000.00 monthly which is inadequate to support the education of their child. Respondent is earning more or less P25,000.00 monthly, he is very much able to support the child notwithstanding the fact that it is his obligation to support their child.
ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED 1. Whether or not the marriage is void ab initio because of the previous valid marriage of the respondent;
2. Whether or not their child is entitled to support and how much;
Doe v. Doe Civil Case No. 06-10 For Judicial Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Page 3 of 4
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRESENTED 1. Certified photocopy of the Marriage Certificate of the petitioner and the respondent to be marked as Exhibit A. a. The signature appearing above the printed name Lin Doe to be marked as Exhibit A-1. b. The signature appearing above the printed name Roy Doe to be marked as Exhibit A-2. c. The Signature appearing above the printed name Pastor Levy M. Erasga to be marked as Exhibit A-3.
2. Certified photocopy of the birth certificate of Mark Gabriel Doe to be marked as Exhibit B.
3. Certified photocopy of the birth certificate of Reymous Doe to be marked as Exhibit C.
4. Certified photocopy of the Marriage Certificate between the Respondent and Grace Dela Cruz to be marked as Exhibit D. a. The signature appearing above the printed name Roy Doe to be marked as Exhibit D-1. b. The signature appearing above the printed name Grace Dela Cruz to be marked as Exhibit D-2. c. The signature appearing above the printed name Rev. Ernesto S. De Vera to be marked as Exhibit D-3.
5. Petitioner reserves the right to present other documents that may be necessary during the course of the trial.
Doe v. Doe Civil Case No. 06-10 For Judicial Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Page 4 of 4
INTENTION TO AVAIL DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Petitioner is willing to avail discovery procedures or referral to commissioners.
WITNESSES TO BE PRESENTED 1. Petitioner will present herself to testify about her marriage with the respondent and to ascertain that Mark Gabriel Doe is their child.
2. Pastor Levy M. Ersaga who will testify about the fact of the celebration of marriage he solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent.
3. Rev. Ernesto S. De Vera who will testify about the fact of the celebration of marriage he solemnized between Grace Dela Cruz and the respondent.
4. Petitioner reserves the right to present other witnesses who will testify about the fact of her marriage with the respondent and other related matters as it may be necessary in the course of trial.
AVAILABLE TRIAL DATES The undersigned counsel is available for trial on the following dates, 6, 13, 20, and 27 of October 2009. The undersigned counsel also respects the calendar of this Honorable Court and agrees to other dates that may be set during the pre-trial as may be convenient to the counsel for the defendant and the Honorable Court.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Marikina City for Makati City, 29 September 2009.
ISRAEL ABCEDE DAMASCO Counsel for the Petitioner Roll No. XXXXXX IBP No. XXXXXX; Marikina City; 18 Jan. 2009 PTR No. XXXXXXX; Marikina City; 18 Jan. 2009