A new method has been applied to determine trace amounts of caffeine in surface water samples from a near coastal ecosystem such as biscayne bay, Florida. The rational behind the development of such method will be to evaluate the use of unmetabolized caffeine as a potential dissolved phase tracer of human waste contamination. Caffeine was detected in those areas previously identified for consistently exceeding the water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria contamination.
A new method has been applied to determine trace amounts of caffeine in surface water samples from a near coastal ecosystem such as biscayne bay, Florida. The rational behind the development of such method will be to evaluate the use of unmetabolized caffeine as a potential dissolved phase tracer of human waste contamination. Caffeine was detected in those areas previously identified for consistently exceeding the water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria contamination.
A new method has been applied to determine trace amounts of caffeine in surface water samples from a near coastal ecosystem such as biscayne bay, Florida. The rational behind the development of such method will be to evaluate the use of unmetabolized caffeine as a potential dissolved phase tracer of human waste contamination. Caffeine was detected in those areas previously identified for consistently exceeding the water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria contamination.
Trace determination of caffeine in surface water samples by liquid
chromatographyatmospheric pressure chemical ionizationmass
spectrometry (LCAPCIMS) Piero R. Gardinali a,b, * , Xu Zhao b a Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, University Park Campus, CP-313, Miami, Florida 33199, USA b Department of Chemistry, Florida International University, University Park Campus, CP-313, Miami, Florida 33199, USA Received 11 February 2002; accepted 19 September 2002 Abstract A new method based on liquidliquid extraction (LLE) coupled to reverse phase liquid chromatography and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (LCAPCI MS) has been applied to determine trace amounts of caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) in surface water samples from a near coastal ecosystem such as Biscayne Bay, Florida. The rational behind the development of such method will be to evaluate the use of unmetabolized caffeine as a potential dissolved phase tracer of human waste contamination. The method allows for the determination of caffeine at levels as low as 4.0 ng/l (ppt) in both salt and freshwater by extracting and concentrating a 1-l water sample to a final volume of 500 Al and using HPLC separation coupled to an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (APCI MS) system operated in selected ion monitoring (SIM) for the protonated molecular ions (M+ H + ). Samples from different portions of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River, one of its major tributaries, were analyzed and caffeine was detected in those areas previously identified for consistently exceeding the water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria contamination. The caffeine concentration in the samples with positive detection was generally low at levels equal or lower than 41 ng/l. However, there is a marked difference between samples collected in open bay areas and those collected from the Miami River. D 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Caffeine; Dissolved phase tracers; Wastewater; LCAPCI MS 1. Introduction Monitoring and tracking the infiltration of domestic wastewater and untreated sewage into marine coastal eco- systems has been a crucial challenge for environmental managers whose efforts are devoted to protect the delicate balance between biological systems at risk and the inevi- table urban colonization of coastal areas. Molecular tracers are unique chemical compounds that can be used to unequivocally distinguish the contributions of different sources to contaminant burdens in specific environments (Eganhouse, 1997; Takada and Eganhouse, 1998; Standley et al., 2000). As an example, the effect of anthropogenic inputs from urban runoff, agricultural and industrial activ- ities and direct human waste contamination on natural waters in coastal ecosystems is usually evaluated by mon- itoring traditional water quality parameters such as elevated inorganic nutrient levels (Barrett et al., 1999), microbial counts (Santiago-Mercado and Hazen, 1987; Lipp et al., 2001; Paul et al., 2000), the presence of synthetic organic chemicals (Sheldon and Hites, 1978; Eganhouse et al., 1983; Albaiges et al., 1986; Ding et al., 1999; Standley et al., 2000), fecal sterols (Grimalt et al., 1990; Chan et al., 1998; Maldonado et al., 1999) and other emergent contam- inants such as pharmaceuticals and hormones (Halling- Srensen et al., 1998; Hirsh et al., 1999; Stumpf et al., 1999; Ternes et al., 1999). Although the occurrence of these contaminants and their relative concentrations is a good indicator of general environmental degradation, their ability to unequivocally predict or isolate contribution of individ- ual, more specific point sources is often hindered by their multiplicity of origins (Barrett et al., 1999), their partition to sedimentary phases (Vivian, 1986) or environmental stabil- 0160-4120/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0160- 4120( 02) 00080- 6 * Corresponding author. Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, University Park Campus, CP-313, Miami, FL 33199, USA. Tel.: +1-305-348-6354; fax: +1-305-348-3772. E-mail address: gardinal@fiu.edu (P.R. Gardinali). www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 ity (Gabutti et al., 2000). Caffeine, 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (Fig. 1), is ranked number one drug worldwide and is usually employed as a stimulant commonly found in coffee, tea, cocoa, soft drinks and chocolate. It is also a component in hundreds of prescription and over-the-counter drugs, ranging from analgesics to cold medicines (Gilbert et al., 1976; Bunker and Williams, 1979; Stavric et al., 1988; Seiler et al., 1999; Weinberg and Bealer, 2001). The average human consumes considerable amounts of caffeine. From coffee alone, an average American consumes 131 mg of caffeine per day. However, caffeine is extensively metabo- lized by humans with only approximately 3% excreted unchanged in the urine (Tang-Liu et al., 1983). Never- theless, there is far more caffeine introduced to the sewage system by disposal of unconsumed coffee, tea or soft drinks down the sink, and rinsing of coffee pots and cups (Seiler et al., 1999). This fact alone, combined with the limited efficiency of septic systems, provides a potential way of tracing human-derived wastewater intrusions in coastal ecosystems by analyzing the concentrations of caffeine in surface and ground water. Although the incidence of caf- feine occurrence in sewage, surface, ground, and waste- waters has been sparsely reported in the literature (Sheldon and Hites, 1978; Buska et al., 1994; Seiler et al., 1999; Standley et al., 2000; Ternes et al., 2001; Weigel et al., 2001, Siegener and Chen, 2002), there is not enough evidence pointing out the utility of caffeine as water tracer. Inadequate detection limits and the lack of specific method- ology combined with the fact that water treatment drasti- cally reduces the caffeine contamination in wastewater (Ternes et al., 2001) have prevented further interpretation of the isolated occurrences previously reported. There is Fig. 1. Structure of caffeine (a) and atrazine-d5 (b) and their respective full scan mass spectra obtained under the LCAPCI + MS conditions described in the text. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 522 very limited data on the fate of caffeine in the natural environment. One of the few reports on caffeine degradation by a strain of Pseudonomas putida isolated from sewage showed that the parent compound is slowly degraded and transformed to a variety of xanthines (Ogunseitan, 1996). Since caffeine is most likely to persist in the water column largely because of its high solubility (13.5 g/l), low octanol- water partition coefficient (log Kow= 0.01, Gossett et al., 1983) and negligible volatility (Weinberg and Bealer, 2001), it fits the profile for a good, stable, dissolved marker directly related to human activities with no potential biogenic sources. This is also of particular importance for coastal environments where septic tanks contribute large amounts of the wastewater discharges in comparison with treated municipal wastewaters (i.e. the Florida Keys). Analysis of caffeine has been traditionally performed by liquid and gas chromatography (Seiler et al., 1999; Bendriss et al., 2000; Weigel et al., 2001), capillary electrophoresis (Horie and Kohata, 2000) or liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (Bellar and Budde, 1988; Kanazawa et al., 2000) or to tandem mass spectrometry (Ternes et al., 2001). The best reported UV detection limits for caffeine by HPLC (k = 280 nm), which are in the order of 0.05 Ag/l (Patsias and Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, 2000), are still inadequate to determine the trace amounts of caffeine likely to be found in environmental samples (ca. low parts per trillion). Caffeine detection in the sub part-per-billion range has also been reported by Seiler et al. (1999). The protocol requires the extraction of large volumes of water to achieve detection limits of 0.04 Ag/l using gas chromatography mass spec- trometry (GC/MS) in the selected ion monitoring mode. While there is a great improvement over traditional HPLC techniques, the reported occurrences of caffeine are gener- ally very close or below this reported detection limit, thus making the interpretation of the results troublesome. Based on the factors mentioned before, and the difficul- ties associated with the available methodology for the selective analytical detection of environmentally relevant concentrations of caffeine, the proposed investigation will focus on the development and validation of a simple analytical protocol for the detection of trace levels of caffeine in surface waters using direct liquidliquid extrac- tion (LLE) pre-concentration followed by selective detec- tion using high performance liquid chromatography and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mass spectrometry (HPLCMS). 2. Experimental 2.1. Reagents and standards Caffeine, (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine, Fig. 1a) was pur- chased from Fisher Scientific (Suwannee, GA, USA). Deu- Fig. 2. Sample locations along Biscayne Bay and the Miami River, Florida. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 523 terated atrazine (atrazine-d5, Fig. 1b) used as a surrogate standard was purchased as a certified standard solution from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany). Standard stock solutions of caffeine and atrazine-d5 at concentrations of 100 ng/Al in water were prepared and stored in the dark at < 10 jC for up to 1 year. Working standard solutions used to prepare the calibration and fortification standards were prepared bimonthly and routinely checked for degradation. Anhydrous sodium sulfate, granular, combusted at 450 jC for >6 h and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Fisher Scientific. Methanol and methylene chloride Optimak grade or equivalent were obtained from Fisher Scientific and used without further purification. Double deionized, distilled water was used for the preparation of blanks and caffeine-fortified samples. 2.2. Sample collection Surface water samples were collected from 14 stations along Biscayne Bay Florida and one of its mayor freshwater tributaries, the Miami River, between June and August 2000 (Fig. 2). Samples were specifically collected from both open bay areas and sites potentially affected by sewage contam- ination at the Miami River. All samples were collected in 1-l pre-cleaned amber glass bottles from a small boat at a depth of 30 cm below the water surface to avoid collecting the surface microlayer. All samples were stored in the dark at < 4 jC until analysis when they were not immediately extracted after arriving to the laboratory. 2.3. Sample preparation Since the purpose of the study was to evaluate the caffeine concentration in dissolved phase, all samples were filtered through a combusted 0.45-Am glass fiber filter (Whatman, Clifton, NJ, USA) before analysis. Typically, a 1-l volume of the filtered surface water sample was trans- ferred to a 2-l separatory funnel, and the appropriate amount of internal standard (atrazine-d5) was added. After raising the pH of the sample to 89 with a 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution, the samples were extracted using liquidliquid extraction with three portions of 50 ml methylene chloride. The organic extracts were concentrated to a volume of 25 ml using a water bath and a Snyder column and further evaporated to dryness using a gentle stream of purified nitrogen. After reconstituting the samples to 500 Al of 1:1 methanol/water, they were analyzed by LC/MS as described below. 2.4. Analytical determination Quantitative determination of caffeine in the final extracts was carried out by HPLCAPCI MS in positive mode under selected ion monitoring (SIM) using a Navi- gator aQa system (Finnigan, Manchester, UK). The HPLC system (Thermoquest, San Jose, CA, USA) consisted of a P4000 model quaternary pump, an AS300 autosampler equipped with a 20-Al loop and a UV600 PDA detector. A Luna HPLC column (150 4.6 mm I.D.) packed with a bonded C18 phase (5 Am) was used for the chromatographic separation (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The mobile phase was programmed to run in a linear gradient from 30% methanol/70% water to 100% methanol at a flow-rate of 1 ml/min. The total run time required for the analysis was 10 min with caffeine and atrazine-d5 eluting at 3.97 and 8.83 min, respectively. APCI source parameters were optimized for the detection of caffeine as follows: cone voltage was set at 15 V (Fig. 3), the corona needle was kept at 4.07 kVand the source temperature was held at 300 jC. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing and drying gas. The selected ions monitored and the ion ratio criteria for the compounds of interest are shown in Table 1. To further improve the method sensitivity, acquisition time ranges for caffeine and atrazine- d5 were split from 0 to 6 min and from 6 to 10 min, respectively. Internal standard linear calibration plots were constructed using eight points at 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50,100, 200 and 400 pg/ Table 1 Spectral recovery and minimum detection data for the LCAPCI + MS detection of caffeine in surface water samples Analyte tR (min) Monitored ions Dwell Mean recovery (%) LOD (Ag/l) a Range of calibrated M1 M2 Ratio M2/M1 time (ms) (%RSD) n = 6 concentrations (ppt) Caffeine 3.93 195 196 0.10 100 89 (8.3) 0.004 2.5400 Atrazine-d5 8.83 221 223 0.32 100 N/A N/A N/A a LOD was calculated by using a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 (the ratio between the peak intensity and the average noise level). Fig. 3. APCI + source cone voltage optimization for the detection of caffeine. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 524 ml. Since LC/MS systems are prone to background con- tamination, a detection limit calibration solution (CS0, 2.5 pg/ml) was used to check instrument performance at low concentrations. The APCI source was cleaned when the signal-to-noise ratio obtained for this calibration solution was below 3. Assessment of method performance was conducted by analyzing saltwater and freshwater blanks and fortified samples. To avoid the detection of false positives due to naturally occurring organics, especially in the river samples, the limit of detection (LOD) was calcu- lated by using a caffeine signal-to-noise ratio of 10. Cali- bration equations obtained in SIM mode, their appropriate R 2 values and the overall method performance parameters are presented in Table 2. 3. Results and discussion There have been several reports on the determination of low levels of caffeine in aqueous samples in particular for surface, ground and wastewaters (Sheldon and Hites, 1978; Buska et al., 1994; Seiler et al., 1999; Standley et al., 2000; Weigel et al., 2001), and caffeine is often detected in surface waters analyzed for other pharmaceuticals (Ternes et al., 2001). Although a wide variety of methods were used and the detection limits are not always provided, the environ- mental concentrations of caffeine range from traces (Sheldon and Hites, 1978) to as high as 3.2 Ag/l (Buska et al., 1994). The most complete report on caffeine occurrence in surface waters (Standley et al., 2000) reported a range of concentrations between < MDL and 0.115 Ag/l with a mean of 0.013 F0.028 Ag/l. Despite the fact that the method detection limit is not reported in the data, it is safe to assume that concentrations as low as 0.013 Ag/l can be detected. More recently, Ternes et al. (2001) reported con- centrations of caffeine in rivers and wastewaters in Germany ranging from 0.010 Ag/l (LOD in river waters) to 147 Ag/l. So far, this is the lowest detection limit reported for caffeine in aqueous matrices available today in the open literature. Nevertheless, since the detection of small changes in con- centrations is needed for the effective interpretation of caffeine data for tracing purposes, many of the studies often conclude that the presence of the compound is indicative of domestic waste water contamination, but fail short to predict the extent of it. The importance of developing a robust method for consistent detection of caffeine at the low parts per trillion levels is the capability to establish both the existence of an environmental impact and the potential to assess changes in relation to water transport. 3.1. Method development Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization is a very amenable technique for the detection of caffeine. Mass spectra of both the target compound and the internal stand- ard are extremely simple with strong abundant protonated pseudo-molecular ions [M+ H + ] being the major ionization products (Fig. 1a and b). In addition, the presence of isotope clusters provided an adequate way to perform ion ratio confirmations (see Table 1 for ratios). Since the LC eluent had a relatively simple composition (no modifiers were used), both the formation of adducts and the chemical background were kept at a minimum. Optimization of the source parameters showed that the voltage applied to the entrance cone rather than the ionization energy and the source temperature mostly controls ion detection. Ion trans- port to the mass analyzer was optimum at a cone voltage of 15 V for both caffeine and atrazine-d5. Changes in the composition of the mobile phase were the key issue for the optimization of the LC separation. Retention time for caffeine and atrazine-d5 using an initial mixture of 50:50 methanol/water were 2.5 and 15.4 min, respectively. Given the selectivity of the mass spectrometer detector, this sep- aration was adequate, but the detection of caffeine at low levels in the natural samples was often hindered by the ionization of naturally occurring organics present in the final sample extract. To circumvent this difficulty, the elution program was changed to the optimized 30:70 methanol/ water initial mobile phase composition. With this modifica- tion, the retention times of caffeine and atrazine-d5 changed to 3.93 and 8.83, respectively. The increased retention for caffeine improved the detection by an almost order of magnitude by separating it from the solvent front (less chemical background at the detection window). In addition, the early elution of atrazine-d5 provided the added advant- age of an overall shorter run time of 10 min. 3.2. Initial method performance The initial method performance was evaluated by extract- ing fortified fresh and saltwater blanks and fortified natural samples. The overall results (Table 1) indicated good recov- ery of caffeine (89%, 8.3% RSD, n = 6) from all samples independently of matrix composition. Reproducibility was also checked on a more limited basis by analyzing a duplicate of one of the Miami River Samples (MR2, Table 3). Repli- cation between duplicates was very good (31.5 F2.65, 8.33% RSD). Although it is very difficult to eliminate sources of caffeine contamination in a laboratory, only a few of the blanks tested during the study showed traces of caffeine and always at concentrations below the 4 ng/l LOD. 3.3. Linearity and limit of detection The caffeine calibration curve data obtained for six replicate analyses is presented in Table 2. Based on the Table 2 Internal standard-based calibration performance Compound Equation Slope (RSD%) R 2 Average RRF RRF (%RSD) Caffeine y = 1.9558x + 0.0176 4.75 0.9997 1.845 5.89 P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 525 relative standard deviation obtained for both linear calibra- tions (slope = 1.9558 F4.75%) and response factor-based quantitation (RRF = 1.845 F5.89%), an excellent linearity was obtained for the concentration range tested (5500 pg/ Al). It is important to note, however, that the calculated LOD corresponds to a caffeine signal-to-noise ratio of 10 (4 ng/l), while responses of the lowest calibration solution (CS0, 2.5 pg/AL) will produce detection limits in the order of 1.25 ng/l at a signal-to-noise ratio of >3. However, since instrument performance at this level is less reproducible, a decision was made to use this calibration solution as an instrument sensitivity check rather than an extra calibration point. Typical reconstructed mass fragmentograms for a blank, the sensitivity check solution and a sample from the Miami River are shown in Fig. 4. 3.4. Application to real samples Upon completion of the method development phase, its performance was tested by analyzing a set of surface water samples from Biscayne Bay and the Miami River (Fig. 2). The results, presented in Table 3 and summarized in Fig. 5, confirm the presence of caffeine in 82% (9/11) of the stations surveyed. Concentrations of caffeine ranged from < LOD to 41.2 ng/l ( < 0.004 to 0.041 Ag/l) with levels in the open bay areas being in average four times lower than the ones observed in the river. Since the amount of data generated in this study is limited, interpretation of spatial trends other than the difference between the river and the bay waters is difficult; however, the fact that caffeine concentrations at station MR1 were consistently elevated (41.2 and 21.8 ng/l) in two separate sampling episodes (June Table 3 Concentrations of caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) in surface water samples from Biscayne Bay, Florida Sampling Site Location Classification Sampling date Caffeine Latitude Longitude concentration (ng/l) Miami River 1A (MR1A) 25j46V187WN 80j11V382WW Mixed, estuarine June 23, 2000 41.2 Miami River 1B (MR1B) 25j46V187WN 80j11V382WW Mixed, estuarine August 14, 2000 21.8 Miami River 2 (MR2) 25j46V957WN 80j12V938WW Freshwater, river August 14, 2000 31.8 (2.65) a Miami River 3 (MR3) 24j47V189WN 80j13V434WW Freshwater, river August 14, 2000 24.1 Miami Beach Marina (MBM) 25j46V008WN 80j08V273WW Saltwater, marina June 23, 2000 7.47 Mc Arthur Causeway (MCC) 25j46V461WN 80j08V657WW Saltwater, waterway June 23, 2000 6.16 Governors Cut (BBGC) 25j45V867WN 80j07V998WW Saltwater, waterway June 23, 2000 <LOD Biscayne Bay 126 (BB126) 25j40V074WN 80j12V201WW Saltwater, open bay June 23, 2000 <LOD Biscayne Bay 129 (BB129) 25j44V400WN 80j11V160WW Saltwater, open bay June 23, 2000 11.9 Biscayne Bay 130 (BB130) 25j45V630WN 80j10V111WW Saltwater, restricted bay June 23, 2000 11.9 Biscayne Bay 131 (BB 131) 25j48V063WN 80j10V086WW Saltwater, restricted bay June 23, 2000 7.69 Red 3 Marker (BBR3) 25j45V856WN 80j08V775WW Saltwater, waterway June 23, 2000 <LOD a Result is the average of two determinations. The number in parenthesis is the standard deviation. < LOD indicates a detected concentration below the 4 ng/L detection limit at a S/N ratio of 10. Fig. 4. Typical reconstructed mass chromatograms for a saltwater blank, the lowest calibration solution (CS0) and a Miami River sample. Fig. 5. Caffeine concentration distributions in surface water samples from Biscayne Bay and the Miami River, Florida. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 526 and August 2000) indicates the existence of a sustained flux of human-derived wastewater contamination along the river water. These results are in good agreement with the long- term history of contamination documented in the Miami River where elevated bacterial counts are often observed in conjunction with recurrent episodes of deteriorated water quality (Hefty, 2000). 4. Conclusions The analytical method developed in the present work allows for the identification and quantitation of unmetabol- ized caffeine in surface water samples in a simple and sensitive way. LLE extraction of a 1-l water sample volume and solvent exchange to a compatible mobile phase solvent allow for the determination of caffeine at low parts per trillion levels (4 ng/l LOD), making the interpretation of environmentally relevant concentrations possible. The over- all method performance based on the figures of merit presented was very good both in terms of precision and accuracy. The analysis of real samples from Biscayne Bay and the Miami River revealed a fourfold difference between areas not commonly affected by nutrient enrichment or sewage inputs versus areas chronically influenced by sew- age discharges and elevated eutrophication. Monitoring such small changes may be particularly important in urban-stressed coastal environments like Biscayne Bay or the Florida Keys where frequent accidental ruptures of sewage lines, pump station overflows or elevated numbers of inefficient septic tank systems are common. Further studies aimed to assess the co-occurrence of caffeine and other traditional water quality parameters and to evaluate the extent of the river influence to the adjacent bay waters are already underway. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Florida International University Advanced Mass Spectrometry Facility (AMSF) for providing analytical support and the Southeast Environ- mental Research Center (SERC) for financial support. SERC contribution # 02-184. References Albaiges J, Casado F, Ventura F. Organic indicators of groundwater pollu- tion by a sanitary landfill. Water Res 1986;20:11539. Barrett MH, Hiscock KM, Pedley S, Lerner DN, Tellam JH, French MJ. Marker species for identifying urban groundwater recharge sources: a review and case sturdy in Nottingham, UK. Water Res 1999;33: 308397. Bellar T, Budde W. Determination of nonvolatile organic compounds in aqueous environmental samples using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 1988;60:207683. Bendriss E, Markoglou N, Wainer IW. Liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of caffeine and fourteen caffeine metab- olites in urine. J Chromatogr, B 2000;746:3318. Bunker M, Williams M. Caffeine contents in common beverages. J Am Diet Assoc 1979;74:2832. Buska P, Barber L, Schroeder M, Becker L. Organic Compounds Down- stream from a Treated-Wastewater Discharge near Dallas, Texas, March 1987. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 93-4194, Austin, TX, USA; 1994. Chan KH, Lam MH, Poon KW, Yeung HY, Chiu TKT. Application of sedimentary fecal stanols and sterols in tracing sewage pollution in coastal waters. Water Res 1998;32:22535. Ding WH, Wu J, Semadeni M, Reinhard M. Occurrence and behavior of wastewater indicators in the Santa Ana River and the underlying aqui- fers. Chemosphere 1999;39:178194. Eganhouse R. Molecular markers in environmental geochemistry. In: Egan- house RP, editor. ACS symposium series, vol. 671. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1997. p. 120. Eganhouse RP, Brumfield DL, Kaplan IR. Long-chain alkylbenzenes as molecular tracers of domestic wastes in the marine environment. Envi- ron Sci Technol 1983;17:52330. Gabutti G, De Donno A, Bagordo F, Montagna MT. Comparative survival of faecal and human contaminants and use of staphylococcus aureus as an effective indicator of human pollution. Mar Pollut Bull 2000;40: 697700. Gilbert R, Marshman J, Schweider M, Berg R. Caffeine contents of bev- erages as consumed. J Can Med Assoc 1976;114:2058. Grimalt JO, Fernandez P, Bayona JM, Albaiges J. Assessment of fecal sterols and ketones as indicators of urban sewage inputs to coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol 1990;24:35763. Gossett RW, Brown DA, Young DR. Predicting the bioaccumulation of organic compounds in marine organisms using octanol/water partition coefficients. Mar Pollut Bull 1983;14:38792. Halling-Srensen B, Nors Nielsen S, Lanzky P, Ingerslev F, Holten Lutz- hoft H, Jrgensen S. Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environmenta review. Chemosphere 1998;36: 35793. Hefty, L. Biscayne Bay Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, Per- sonal Communication. Miami-Dade County Environmental Resources Management (DERM) 2000. Hirsh R, Ternes TA, Haberer K, Kratz KH. Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ 1999;225:10919. Horie H, Kohata K. Analysis of tea components by high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr, A 2000;881:42538. Kanazawa H, Atsumi R, Matsushima Y, Kizu J. Determination of theophyl- line and its metabolites in biological samples by liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr, A 2000;870:8796. Lipp EK, Farrah SA, Rose JB. Assessment and impact of microbial fecal pollution and human enteric pathogens in a coastal community. Mar Pollut Bull 2001;42:28693. Maldonado C, Dachs J, Bayona JM. Trialkylamines and coprostanol as tracers of urban pollution in waters from enclosed seas: the Mediterra- nean and Black Sea. Environ Sci Technol 1999;33:32906. Ogunseitan OA. Removal of caffeine in sewage by Pseudonomas putida: implications for water pollution index. WJ Microbiol Biotechnol 1996; 13(3):2516. Patsias J, Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E. Development of an automated on- line solid-phase extraction-high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of aniline, phenol, caffeine and various selected substituted aniline and phenol compounds in aqueous matrices. J Chro- matogr, A 2000;904:17188. Paul JH, McLaughlin MR, Griffin DW, Lipp EK, Stokes R, Rose JB. Rapid movement of wastewater from on-site disposal systems into surface waters in the lower Florida Keys. Estuaries 2000;23:6628. Santiago-Mercado J, Hazen T. Comparison of four membrane filter meth- ods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:29228. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 527 Seiler RL, Zaugg SD, Thomas JM, Howcroft DL. Caffeine and pharma- ceuticals as indicators of wastewater contamination in wells. Ground Water 1999;37:40510. Sheldon LS, Hites RA. Organic compounds in the Delaware River. Environ Sci Technol 1978;12:118894. Siegener R, Chen RF. Caffeine in Boston Harbor seawater. Mar Pollut Bull 2002;44:3837. Standley LJ, Kaplan LA, Smith D. Molecular traces of organic matter sources to surface water resources. Environ Sci Technol 2000;34: 312430. Stavric B, Klassen R, Watkinson B, Karpinski K, Stapley R, Fried P. Variability in caffeine consumption from coffee and tea: possible sig- nificance for epidemiological studies. Found Chem Toxicol 1988;26: 1805. Stumpf M, Ternes TA, Wilken RD, Rodrigues SV, Baumann W. Polar drug residues in sewage and natural waters in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 1999;225:13541. Takada H, Eganhouse R. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of environ- mental analysis and remediation. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 2833940. Tang-Liu D, Williams R, Riegelman S. Disposition of caffeine and its metabolites in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983;24:1805. Ternes TA, Stumpf M, Mueller J, Haberer K, Wilken RD, Servos M. Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plantsI. Investigations in Germany, Canada and Brazil. Sci Total Environ 1999;225:8190. Ternes T, Bonerz M, Scmidt T. Determination of neutral pharmaceuticals in wastewater and rivers by liquid chromatographyelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr, A 2001;938:17585. Vivian C. Tracers of sewage sludge in the marine environment: a review. Sci Total Environ 1986;53:540. Weigel S, Bester K, Huhnerfuss H. New method for rapid solid-phase extraction of large-volume water samples and its application to non- target screening of North Sea water for organic contaminants by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr, A 2001;912: 15161. Weinberg B, Bealer B. The world of caffeine: the science and culture of the worlds most popular drug. New York: Routledge; 2001. p. 213316. P.R. Gardinali, X. Zhao / Environment International 28 (2002) 521528 528