Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin pens a letter to members of the Assembly Local Government Committee, advocating for much needed corrections and clarifications to the state's affordable housing density bonus law.
Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin pens a letter to members of the Assembly Local Government Committee, advocating for much needed corrections and clarifications to the state's affordable housing density bonus law.
Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin pens a letter to members of the Assembly Local Government Committee, advocating for much needed corrections and clarifications to the state's affordable housing density bonus law.
Committee on Local Government 1020 N Street, Room 157 Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Honorable Committee Members,
I am writing in strong support of Assemblymember Adrin Nazarians affordable housing density bonus bill, AB 2222, which is scheduled to be considered by your committee on May 7, 2014. AB 2222 offers much needed clarification and correction to Californias affordable housing density bonus law, commonly referred to as SB 1818.
Nearly a decade ago, an idea about how to create more affordable housing throughout the state was adopted. The concept was straightforward enough - if developers agreed to build more affordable housing units as part of a new apartment or condominium project, they would be eligible for certain incentives in return. In exchange for providing more housing opportunities for lower- and middle-income families, cities would allow developers to benefit from density bonuses and incentives such as allowing more height or requiring less parking for a project.
What started as a well-intentioned legislative attempt to ensure economic diversity in all communities has become sadly manipulated, and in the process has changed the character of our communities - without delivering on the promise of more affordable housing. Instead of creating more housing that is affordable for lower- and middle-income families, SB 1818 has become a grab-bag of incentives, littered with loopholes that create more density and traffic, without increasing our affordable housing opportunities for those who need them.
This problem is felt even more acutely in cities such as Los Angeles, which have rent stabilization regulations designed to mitigate against the impacts of ever-increasing housing costs. Those rent-controlled units are at risk with SB 1818 as it currently exists. It is becoming far too commonplace that rent-controlled apartments are being demolished to make way for condominium projects containing the bare minimum of affordable units needed to trigger the SB 1818 density bonus. In my district, a building with 32 rent-controlled apartments was recently demolished to make way for a 49-unit condominium project, with only four affordable units. Many of the tenants who lived in those units will no longer be able to afford to live in their neighborhood, as the availability of housing that teachers, firefighters, nurses, and other middle- class professionals can afford continues to decrease.
AB 2222 takes critical steps to close the loopholes and prevent density bonus projects from resulting in a net decrease in affordable housing. Instead, AB 2222 requires a net increase in the number of affordable units on a property. AB 2222 would amend SB 1818 to require that an applicant replace any existing affordable units on a property with at least the same number of affordable units in order for the applicant to be eligible to seek a density bonus. The applicant would be required to provide the percentage of affordable units specified in SB 1818 in addition to the replacement units in order to qualify for additional density, incentives, and concessions. This would prevent the net loss of affordable housing as property with rent-controlled or other de facto affordable housing is redeveloped.
AB 2222 also ensures the long-term affordability of very low and low-income units that are used to trigger density bonuses. This bill would increase the term of affordability from 30 to 55 years. We not only need to increase the number of affordable units, we need to increase the amount of time in which we can count on them being affordable.
As our lower- and middle-class families continue to suffer through a slow economic recovery, and as housing costs continue to rise at a frightening pace, we owe it to our communities to ensure that they remain economically diverse and that the vision to create more affordable housing is realized. I request that you support AB 2222, as proposed, to increase the supply of desperately needed affordable housing.
Regards,
MIKE BONIN Councilmember, District 11
cc: The Honorable Holly Mitchell The Honorable Ted Lieu The Honorable Richard Bloom The Honorable Sebastian Ridley-Thomas The Honorable Steve Bradford The Honorable Al Muratsuchi