You are on page 1of 15

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

ETAP

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Electrical Transient Analyzer Program


Load Flow Analysis
Loading Category (1):

Design

Generation Category (1):

Design

Load Diversity Factor:

Number of Buses:

Number of Branches:

None

Swing

V-Control

Load

Total

11

XFMR2

XFMR3

Reactor

Line/Cable

Impedance

Tie PD

Total

Method of Solution:

Newton-Raphson Method

Maximum No. of Iteration:

99

Precision of Solution:

0.0001000

System Frequency:

60.00 Hz

Unit System:

English

Project Filename:

EXAMPLE

Output Filename:

E:\DemoFiles\EXAMPLE-ANSI\LFreport.lfr

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Adjustments
Apply
Tolerance

Individual

Adjustments

/Global

Transformer Impedance:

Yes

Individual

Reactor Impedance:

Yes

Individual

Overload Heater Resistance:

No

Transmission Line Length:

No

Cable Length:

No

Apply
Temperature Correction

Percent

Individual

Adjustments

/Global

Transmission Line Resistance:

Yes

Individual

Cable Resistance:

Yes

Individual

Degree C

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Bus Input Data


Load
Bus
ID

Initial Voltage
Sub-sys

MW

Constant Z

Mvar

MW

Constant I

% Mag.

Ang.

Bus1

0.480

100.0

0.0

Bus2

0.480

100.0

0.0

0.647

0.370

0.256

0.018

0.311

0.162

0.179

0.000

0.000

-0.450

LVBus

kV

Constant kVA

Mvar

MW

0.480

97.1

-3.5

34.500

100.0

0.0

MCC1

0.480

97.9

-3.1

0.304

0.137

Sub2A

13.800

101.5

-1.2

0.998

-0.616

Sub2B

13.800

100.0

1.4

1.908

0.763

Sub 3

4.160

99.8

-0.5

Sub3 Swgr

4.160

99.6

-0.5

0.407

0.185

Sub22

3.450

100.0

0.0

1.785

1.106

1.301

0.806

Sub23

3.450

100.0

0.0

0.298

0.184

0.128

0.079

6.602

2.148

1.919

0.597

Main Bus

Total Number of Buses: 11

Generation Bus
ID

kV

Voltage
Type

Sub-sys

Generation

% Mag.

Angle

Main Bus

34.500

Swing

100.0

0.0

Sub2B

13.800

Voltage Control

100.0

1.4

MW

Mvar

6.300
6.300

Mvar

0.000

MW

0.000

Mvar Limits
% PF

Max

5.286
0.000

Generic

Min

-2.534

0.000

Mvar

0.000

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Line/Cable Input Data


Ohms or Siemens/1000 ft per Conductor (Cable) or per Phase (Line)
Line/Cable
ID

Length
Library

T (C)

% Tol.

#/Phase

5.0MCUS3

750

222.0

0.0

75

0.022300

0.036400

Cable14

1.0MCUN3

250

100.0

0.0

75

0.055200

0.037900

Line / Cable resistances are listed at the specified temperatures.

Size

Adj. (ft)

Cable2

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

2-Winding Transformer Input Data

Transformer
ID

Rating
Phase

% Z1

X1/R1

+ 5%

- 5%

% Tap Setting
% Tol.

Prim.

Sec.

Adjusted

Phase Shift

Prim. kV

Sec. kV

%Z

Type

T2

3-Phase

10.000

34.500

13.800

6.90

23.00

-1.50

2.10

6.9000

Dyn

0.000

T3

3-Phase

0.750

4.160

0.480

5.75

18.00

5.7500

Dyn

0.000

T4

3-Phase

1.500

4.160

0.480

5.75

7.10

5.7500

Dyn

0.000

T22

3-Phase

5.000

13.800

3.450

6.50

12.14

6.5000

Dyn

0.000

T23

3-Phase

5.000

13.800

3.450

6.50

12.14

6.5000

Dyn

0.000

3-Phase

1.000

4.160

0.480

7.20

28.00

-2.500

7.2000

Dyn

0.000

XFMR 3

MVA

Z Variation

Angle

3-Winding Transformer Input Data

Transformer
ID
T1

Rating
Winding

MVA

Tap
kV

Impedance

% Z1

Phase Shift

X1/R1

MVAb

% Tol.

+ 5%

- 5%

7.10

39.00

15.000

Zpt =

7.20

40.00

15.000

Std Pos. Seq.

0.000

Zst =

14.10

38.00

15.000

Std Pos. Seq.

0.000

Primary:

15.000

34.500

Zps =

Secondary:

10.000

13.800

5.000

4.160

Tertiary:

Z Variation

Type

Angle

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Branch Connections
CKT/Branch

Connected Bus ID

ID

Type

From Bus

% Impedance, Pos. Seq., 100 MVA Base


To Bus

T2

2W XFMR

Main Bus

Sub2A

R
3.00

68.93

69.00

T3

2W XFMR

Sub3 Swgr

LVBus

42.53

765.49

766.67

T4

2W XFMR

Sub 3

Bus1

53.46

379.59

383.33

T22

2W XFMR

Sub2A

Sub22

10.67

129.56

130.00

T23

2W XFMR

Sub2B

Sub23

10.67

129.56

130.00

XFMR 3

2W XFMR

Sub3 Swgr

MCC1

25.06

701.55

702.00

T1

3W Xfmr

Main Bus

Sub2B

1.18

47.98

47.99

3W Xfmr

Main Bus

Sub 3

1.17

48.66

48.68

3W Xfmr

Sub2B

Sub 3

324.12

3383.37

3398.86

Cable2

Cable

Sub 3

Sub3 Swgr

Cable14

Cable

Bus1

Bus2

2.86

4.67

5.48

119.79

82.25

145.31

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Equipment Cable Input Data

Ohms or Siemens/1000 ft per Conductor


Equipment Cable
ID

ID

O/L Heater

Length

Equipment
Type

Library

Size

Adj. (ft)

Resistance
% Tol

#/ph

T (C)

Adj.(ohm)

% Tol

Cable13

Load1

Stat. Load

1.0MCUN1

350

67.0

0.0

75

.03900

.05000

.0000000

.0000

0.0

Cable21

MOV1

MOV

0.6MCUN3

470.0

0.0

75

.32100

.04830

.0000000

.0000

0.0

15MCUS3

1200.0

0.0

75

.20200

.05240

.0000000

.0007

0.0

Cable18

Mtr2

Ind. Motor

Overload Heater

Mtr5

Ind. Motor

Cable20

Pump 1

Ind. Motor

Cable7

Syn1

Cable12

Syn2

.0015

0.0

5.0MCUS1

350

650.0

0.0

75

.03860

.05620

.0000000

.0000

0.0

Syn. Motor

15MCUS3

1250.0

0.0

75

.32100

.05680

.0000000

.0000

0.0

Syn. Motor

1.0MCUN1

59.0

0.0

75

.16000

.05700

.0000000

.0000

0.0

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

UPS Input Data


AC Rating
kV
ID
UPS-1

DC Rating

FLA

MVA

Input

Output

Input

Output

% EFF

% PF

kV

FLA

% Imax

Operating
% PF

Bypass
Switch

0.222

0.480

0.480

296.69

267.02

90.00

90.09

0.125

1688.889

150.0

90.09

No

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

LOAD FLOW REPORT

Bus
ID
Bus1

Voltage
kV
0.480

% Mag.
97.891

Generation

Ang.
-1.9

Bus2

0.480

96.775

-2.0

LVBus

0.480

97.976

-3.0

* Main Bus

34.500

100.000

0.0

MW

Load

Mvar
0

MW
0

Load Flow
Mvar

ID
0

MW

XFMR
Mvar

Amp

%PF

Bus2

0.654

0.375

926.9

86.7

Sub 3

-0.654

-0.375

926.9

86.7

0.647

0.370

Bus1

-0.647

-0.370

926.9

86.8

0.554

0.174

Sub3 Swgr

-0.554

-0.174

712.9

95.4

2.144

2.178

Sub2A

4.000

1.532

71.7

93.4

Sub2B

-1.856

0.646

32.9

-94.4

%Tap

& Sub 3
MCC1

0.480

101.063

-2.5

Sub2A

13.800

98.861

-1.6

* Sub2B

13.800

100.000

1.1

0.487

0.137

Sub3 Swgr

-0.487

-0.137

601.9

96.3

0.998

-0.616

Main Bus

-3.995

-1.406

179.2

94.3

Sub22

2.997

2.022

153.0

82.9

6.300

0.971

1.908

0.763

Sub23

0.424

0.266

21.0

84.7

Sub 3

3.968

-0.059

166.0

-100.0

1.451

0.541

215.6

93.7

& Main Bus


Sub 3

4.160

99.731

-0.6

0.000

-0.448

Sub3 Swgr
Bus1

0.658

0.398

106.9

85.6

-2.109

-0.492

301.3

97.4

Sub 3

-1.451

-0.540

215.6

93.7

Main Bus
& Sub2B
Sub3 Swgr

4.160

99.664

-0.6

0.407

0.185

LVBus

0.556

0.200

82.3

94.1

MCC1

0.488

0.155

71.2

95.3

Sub22

3.450

95.960

-3.8

2.983

1.848

Sub2A

-2.983

-1.848

612.0

85.0

Sub23

3.450

99.611

0.8

0.424

0.263

Sub2B

-0.424

-0.263

83.8

85.0

* Indicates a voltage regulated bus (voltage controlled or swing type machine connected to it)
# Indicates a bus with a load mismatch of more than 0.1 MVA

-2.500

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

10

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Bus Loading Summary Report

Directly Connected Load


Bus
ID

Constant kVA
kV

Bus1

0.480

Bus2

0.480

LVBus

0.480

Main Bus

34.500

Rated Amp

1200.0

Constant Z

Mvar

0.647

0.370

0.256

0.018

MW

Constant I

Mvar

MW

Generic

Mvar

MW

Mvar

MVA

% PF

Amp

0.754

86.7

926.9

0.746

86.8

926.9

0.299

0.156

0.601

92.3

737.5

Percent
Loading

77.2

4.555

87.8

76.2

0.304

0.137

0.183

0.506

96.3

601.9

800.0

0.998

-0.616

4.477

89.2

189.5

23.7

13.800

1600.0

1.908

0.763

6.384

98.7

267.1

16.7

4.160

600.0

-0.448

2.309

91.3

321.3

53.5

Sub3 Swgr

4.160

225.0

0.407

0.185

1.548

93.7

215.6

95.8 #

Sub22

3.450

1200.0

1.785

1.106

1.198

0.742

3.509

85.0

612.0

51.0

Sub23

3.450

1200.0

0.298

0.184

0.127

0.078

0.499

85.0

83.8

7.0

MCC1

0.480

Sub2A

13.800

Sub2B
Sub 3

1200.0

MW

Total Bus Load

* Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus critical limit ( 100.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
# Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus marginal limit ( 90.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).

6.4

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

11

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Branch Loading Summary Report

Transformer
CKT / Branch
ID

Cable & Reactor


Type

Ampacity
(Amp)
275.00

Loading
Amp

Capability
(MVA)

Loading (input)
MVA

Loading (output)

MVA

Cable2

Cable

T2

Transformer

12.000

4.283

35.7

4.235

35.3

T3

Transformer

0.840

0.591

70.3

0.581

69.1

T4

Transformer

1.800

0.769

42.7

0.754

41.9

T22

Transformer

5.000

3.615

72.3

3.509

70.2

T23

Transformer

5.000

0.501

10.0

0.499

10.0

XFMR 3

Transformer

1.000

0.512

51.2

0.506

50.6

T1

3W XFMR p

22.500

1.966

8.7

3W XFMR s

15.000

3.968

26.5

3W XFMR t

7.500

2.165

28.9

* Indicates a branch with operating load exceeding the branch capability.

215.56

%
78.39

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

12

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Branch Losses Summary Report

CKT / Branch
ID
Cable14

From-To Bus Flow

To-From Bus Flow

MW

MW

Mvar

Mvar

Losses
kW

% Bus Voltage
kvar

From

To

Vd
% Drop
in Vmag

0.654

0.375

-0.647

-0.370

7.1

4.9

97.9

96.8

1.12

T4

-0.654

-0.375

0.658

0.398

3.2

22.5

97.9

99.7

1.84

T3

-0.554

-0.174

0.556

0.200

1.5

26.9

98.0

99.7

1.69

T2

4.000

1.532

-3.995

-1.406

5.5

126.5

100.0

98.9

1.14

-0.487

-0.137

0.488

0.155

0.6

18.0

101.1

99.7

1.40

T22

XFMR 3

2.997

2.022

-2.983

-1.848

14.3

173.2

98.9

96.0

2.90

T23

0.424

0.266

-0.424

-0.263

0.3

3.2

100.0

99.6

0.39

1.451

0.541

-1.451

-0.540

0.7

1.1

99.7

99.7

0.07

T1

Cable2

-1.856

0.646

3.968

-0.059

2.5

96.0

100.0

100.0

0.00

T1

0.000

0.000

-2.109

-0.492

100.0

99.7

0.27

35.7

472.5

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

13

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Equipment Cable and Overload Heater Losses Summary Report


% Voltage
Connected Load
ID

Cable /Overload Heater


Type

ID

Losses
Library

kW

Terminal on
kvar

Bus

Bus kV

Load kV

% Vd
Operating

% Vst
Starting

Mtr2

Ind. Motor

Cable18

15MCUS3

5.4

1.4

100.00

99.73

104.26

0.27

99.26

Pump 1

Ind. Motor

Cable20

5.0MCUS1

0.3

0.4

99.66

99.57

103.55

0.10

99.05

Syn1

Syn. Motor

Cable7

15MCUS3

3.0

0.5

98.86

98.67

103.16

0.19

98.47

Mtr5

Ind. Motor

Overload Heater

101.06

101.04

105.43

0.03

100.99

Syn2

Syn. Motor

Cable12

1.0MCUN1

0.8

0.0
0.3

97.98

97.56

101.80

0.42

95.63

Load1

St. Load

Cable13

1.0MCUN1

0.8

1.1

97.98

97.52

97.52

0.46

0.00

MOV1

MOV

Cable21

0.6MCUN3

97.98

97.98

102.24

0.00

0.00

ETAP

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

14

Date:

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

Alert Summary Report


% Alert Settings
Critical

Marginal

Loading
Bus

100.0

90.0

Cable

100.0

90.0

Reactor

100.0

90.0

Line

100.0

95.0

Transformer

100.0

95.0

Panel

100.0

95.0

Protective Device

100.0

85.0

Generator

100.0

95.0

Inverter/Charger

100.0

95.0

OverVoltage

105.0

102.0

UnderVoltage

95.0

98.0

OverExcited (Q Max.)

100.0

95.0

UnderExcited (Q Min.)

100.0

Bus Voltage

Generator Excitation

Critical Report
Rating/Limit

Unit

CB31

Device ID

LV CB

Type

Overload

Condition

800.00

Amp

Operating
926.88

% Operating
115.9

3-Phase

Phase Type

Charger1

Charger

Overload

601.41

Amp

621.45

103.3

3-Phase

Fuse3

Fuse

Overload

390.00

Amp

601.93

154.3

3-Phase

UPS-1

UPS

Overload

296.69

Amp

306.58

103.3

3-Phase

Marginal Report
Device ID

Type

Condition

Rating/Limit

Bus1

Bus

Under Voltage

0.48

Bus2

Bus

Under Voltage

Fuse2

Fuse

Overload

LVBus

Bus

Under Voltage

0.48

Sub22

Bus

Under Voltage

3.45

Sub3 Swgr

Bus

Overload

0.48
125.00

225.00

Unit
kV
kV

Operating

% Operating

Phase Type

0.47

97.9

3-Phase

0.46

96.8

3-Phase

121.56

97.2

3-Phase

kV

0.47

98.0

3-Phase

kV

3.31

96.0

3-Phase

215.56

95.8

3-Phase

Amp

Amp

Project:

Example

Location:

Irvine, California

Contract:

OTI-12345678

Engineer:

Operation Technology, Inc.

Filename:

EXAMPLE

ETAP

Page:

12.5.0C

Study Case: LF 100A

09-30-2013

SN:

ETAP-OTI

Revision:

Base

Config.:

Normal

SAMPLE OUTPUT REPORT - DOES NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL RESULTS


Second line of remarks for "LF 100A" study case.

SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION , LOADING & DEMAND

MW

Mvar

MVA

% PF

Source (Swing Buses):

2.144

2.178

3.056

70.14 Lagging

Source (Non-Swing Buses):

6.300

0.971

6.374

98.83 Lagging

Total Demand:

8.444

3.149

9.012

93.69 Lagging

Total Motor Load:

6.602

2.148

6.943

95.09 Lagging

Total Static Load:

1.806

0.529

1.882

95.97 Lagging

Total Constant I Load:

0.000

0.000

0.000

Total Generic Load:

0.000

0.000

0.000

Apparent Losses:

0.036

0.472

System Mismatch:

0.000

0.000

Number of Iterations: 2

15

Date:

You might also like