886 views

Uploaded by D.Viswanath

A simplified elaboration of the book by fersiger peric

- Advanced Fluid Dynamics
- Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics i To
- Missile
- Vol - 02 _ Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows
- Numerical Simulations - Examples and Applications in Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Report of Fluent Simulation of Aerofoil NACA 4412
- Ferziger,Peric, Computational Methods For Fluid Dynamics,200
- INVERSE HEAT TRANSFER- OZISIK
- S 3a - Kinematics Wheel
- Seminar on GUIDED MISSILE
- Computational fluid dynamics
- Modelling of Motion of an Automatically Controlled Beam Riding Guided Missile in Terms of the Maggi Equations
- Transfer Function Models Representing the Dynamics of a Missile
- 05 - Mobile Robot_Kinematics R1
- Missile Guidance
- My PPt1
- Sliding Mode Control of Electric Drives
- An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Transducers
- Emphatic Listening

You are on page 1of 4

integro differential) equations, which cannot be solved analytically except in

special cases. To obtain an approximate solution numerically, we have to use

a discretization method, which approximates the differential equations by a

system of algebraic equations, which can then be solved on a computer. The

approximations are applied to small domains in space and/or time so the

numerical solution provides results at discrete locations in space and time.

Much as the accuracy of experimental data depends on the quality of the tools

used, the accuracy of numerical solutions is dependent on the quality of

discretisations used.

2. Possibilities and limitations of Numerical Methods.

If we want to simulate the flow around a moving car in a wind tunnel, we need to fix the

car model and blow air at it-but the floor has to move at the air speed, which is difficult to

do. It is not difficult to do in a numerical simulation. If we solve the unsteady three-

dimensional Navier-Stokes equations accurately (as in direct simulation of turbulence),

we obtain a complete data set from which any quantity of physical significance can be

derived. The advantages of CFD are conditional on being able to solve the Navier-Stokes

equations accurately, which is extremely difficult for most flows of engineering interest

(in particular for high Reynolds number flows). If we are unable to obtain accurate

solutions for all flows, we have to determine what we can produce and learn to analyse

and judge the results. Numerical results are always approximate and the errors arise from

each part of the process used to produce numerical solutions due to : -

(a) The differential equations may contain approximations or

idealizations.

(b) Approximations are made in the discretisation process.

(c) In solving the discretised equations, iterative methods are used. Unless

they are run for a very long time, the exact solution of the discretized equations is

not produced.

3. When the governing equations are known accurately (e.g., the Navier-Stokes

equations for incompressible Newtonian fluids), solutions of any desired accuracy can be

achieved in principle. However for may phenomena (e.g. turbulence, combustion, and

multiphase flow) the exact equations are either not available or numerical solution is not

feasible. This makes introduction of models a necessity. In order to validate the models,

we have to rely on experimental data. Even when the exact treatment is possible, models

are often needed to reduce the cost.

mathematical model, i.e., the set of partial differential or integro-differential equations

and boundary conditions. The model is chosen appropriate to the target application and

may include simplifications of the exact conservation laws. A solution method is usually

designed for a particular set of equations.

5. Discretisation Method. After selecting the mathematical model, one has to

choose a suitable discretisation method, i.e., a method of approximating the differential

equations by a system of algebraic equations for the variables at some set of discrete

locations in space and time. There are many approaches most important of which are: -

(a) Finite Difference (FD)

(b) Finite Volume (FV) and

(c) Finite Element (FE) Methods.

Other methods, like spectral schemes, boundary element methods, and cellular automata

are used in CFD but limited to special classes of problems.

written in many different forms, depending on the coordinate system and the basis

vectors used. For example we can select Cartesian, cylindrical, spherical, curvilinear

orthogonal or non-orthogonal coordinate systems, which may be fixed or moving. The

choice depends on the target flow, and may influence the discretisation method and grid

type to be used. One has to select the basis in which vectors and tensors will be defined

(fixed or variable, covariant or contravariant, etc). Depending on this choice, the velocity

vector and stress tensor can be expressed in terms of e.g., Cartesian, covariant or

contravariant, physical or non-physical coordinate-oriented components.

calculated are defined by the numerical grid which is essentially a discrete representation

of the geometric domain on which the problem is to be solved. It divides the solution

domain into a finite number of subdomains (elements, control volumes etc.). Some of the

options available are the following: -

(a) Structured (regular) Grid. Regular or structured grids consist of

families of grid lines with the property that members of a single family do not

cross each other and cross each member of the other families only once. This

allows the lines of a given set to be numbered consecutively. The position of any

grid point (or control volume) within the domain is uniquely identified by a set of

two (in 2D) or three (3D) indices e.g., (i,j,k).

(i) The disadvantage of structured grids is that they can be used only

for geometrically simple solution domains. Another disadvantage is that it

may be difficult to control the distributions of the grid points:

concentration of points in one region for reasons of accuracy produces

unnecessarily small spacing in other parts of the solution domain and a

waste of resources. This problem is exaggerated in 3D problems.

(ii) Structured grids may be of H-, O-, or C-type; the names are

derived from the shapes of the grid lines.

more) level subdivision of solution domain. On the coarse level, there are blocks

which are relatively large segments of the domain; their structure may be irregular

and they may or may not overlap. On the fine level (within each block) a

structured grid is defined. This kind of grid is more flexible than the previous

ones, as it allows use of finer grids in regions, where greater resolution is

required. The non-matching interface can be treated in a fully conservative

manner. The programming is more difficult. Solvers for structured grids can be

applied block-wise.

composite or Chimera grids. In the overlap region, boundary conditions for one

block are obtained by interpolating the solution from the other (overlapped) block.

The disadvantage of these grids is that conservation is not easily enforced at block

boundaries. The advantages of this approach are that complex domains are dealt

with more easily and it can be used to follow moving bodies: one block is

attached to the body and moves with it , while a stagnant grid covers the

surroundings. This type is not often used.

(d) Unstructured Grids. For very complex geometries, the most flexible type

of grid is one which can fit an arbitrary solution domain boundary. In principle,

such grids could be used with any discretisation scheme, but they are best adapted

to the finite volume and finite element approaches. The elements or control

volumes may have any shape; nor is there a restriction on the number of neighbor

elements or nodes. Computer codes for unstructured grids are more flexible. They

need not be changed when the grid is locally refined, or when elements or control

volumes of different shapes are used. However, grid generation and pre-

processing are usually much more difficult.

8. Finite Approximations. Following the choice of grid type, one has to select

the approximations to be used in the discretisation process. In a finite difference method,

approximations for the derivatives at the grid points have to be selected. In a finite

volume method, one has to select the methods of approximating surface and volume

integrals. In a finite element method, one has to choose the shape functions (elements)

and weighting functions.

equations. The method of solution depends on the problem. For unsteady flows, methods

based on those used for initial value problems for ordinary differential equations

(marching in time) are used. At each time step an elliptic problem has to be solved.

Steady flow problems are usually solved by pseudo-time marching or an equivalent

iteration scheme. Since the equations are non-linear, an iteration scheme is used to solve

them. These methods use successive linearisation of the equations and the resulting linear

systems are almost always solved by iterative techniques. The choice of solver depends

on the grid type and the number of nodes involved in each algebraic equation.

10. Convergence Criteria. Finally, one needs to set the convergence criteria for the

iterative method. Usually, there are two levels of iterations: inner iterations, within which

the linear equation are solved, and outer iterations, that del with the non linearity and

coupling of the equations. Deciding when to stop the iterative process on each level is

important, from both accuracy and efficiency points of view.

Properties of Numerical Solution Methods

11. The solution method should have certain properties. In most cases, it is not

possible to analyse the complete solution method. One analyses the components of the

method; if the components do not possess the desired properties, neither will the

complete method but the reverse is not necessarily true. The most important properties

are: -

(a) Consistency. The discretisation should become exact as the grid spacing

tends to zero. The difference between the discretised equation and the exact one is

called the truncation error. For a method to be consistent, the truncation error

must become zero when the mesh spacing Δt →0 and/or Δxi →0. Truncation

error is usually proportional to a power of the grid spacing Δxi and or the time

step Δt.

(b) Stability. A numerical solution method is said to be stable if it does

not magnify the errors that appear in the course of numerical solution process.

The most widely used approach to studying stability of numerical schemes is the

von Neumann’s method.

(c) Convergence. A numerical method is said to be convergent if the solution

of the discretized equations tends to the exact solution of the differential equation

as the grid spacing tends to zero.

(d) Conservation. Since the equations to be solved are conservation laws, the

numerical scheme should also-on both a local and a global basis-respect these

laws.

(e) Boundedness. Numerical solutions should lie within proper bounds.

Physically non negative quantities like density, kinetic energy of turbulence must

always be positive.

(f) Realisability. Models of phenomena which are too complex to treat

directly (for e.g., turbulence, combustion, or multiphase flow) should be designed

to guarantee physically realistic solutions.

(g) Accuracy. Numerical solutions of fluid flow and heat transfer

problems are only approximate solutions. They may further include three kinds of

systematic errors: -

(i) Modeling errors, which are defined as the difference between the

actual flow and the exact solution of the mathematical model,

(ii) Discretisation errors, defined as the difference between the

exact solution of the conservation equations and the exact solution of the

algebraic system of equations obtained by discretizing these equations, and

(iii) Iteration errors or convergence errors, defined as the

difference between the iterative and exact solutions of the algebraic

equation systems.

- Advanced Fluid DynamicsUploaded bypeyvand
- Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics i ToUploaded byIvan Hernández
- MissileUploaded byTasmia Tamanna
- Vol - 02 _ Numerical Computation of Internal and External FlowsUploaded bySagar Pradhan
- Numerical Simulations - Examples and Applications in Computational Fluid DynamicsUploaded bycarlosnavalmaster
- Report of Fluent Simulation of Aerofoil NACA 4412Uploaded byاحمد عبد المحمود
- Ferziger,Peric, Computational Methods For Fluid Dynamics,200Uploaded byengels_r1684
- INVERSE HEAT TRANSFER- OZISIKUploaded byzaid5085
- S 3a - Kinematics WheelUploaded byShobee Khan
- Seminar on GUIDED MISSILEUploaded bySandeep Kumar
- Computational fluid dynamicsUploaded bykevinmuri
- Modelling of Motion of an Automatically Controlled Beam Riding Guided Missile in Terms of the Maggi EquationsUploaded byEunju Oh
- Transfer Function Models Representing the Dynamics of a MissileUploaded byD.Viswanath
- 05 - Mobile Robot_Kinematics R1Uploaded byNguyễn Thế Hùng
- Missile GuidanceUploaded byBalamurugan
- My PPt1Uploaded byAppadurai Muthukrishnan
- Sliding Mode Control of Electric DrivesUploaded byD.Viswanath
- An Introduction to Computational Fluid DynamicsUploaded byLisa Roberts
- TransducersUploaded byDivya Sai
- Emphatic ListeningUploaded byMuhammad Nb
- Journal Compilation Part 2Uploaded byjawhar_ghommam
- Computational Fluid DynamicsUploaded byned_marian
- Necla ANN PaperUploaded byjehadyam
- Advance H-Infinity Control (ICE -602) [1]Uploaded bySom Shekar
- Uncertainty and Disturbance ObserverUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Num Sol of NavierUploaded byhlkatk
- Book of Heat Transfer ReviewUploaded byMd.Faysal Ahamed Khan
- 3 Optimization Methods for Engineering Design BookUploaded byLuka
- LDNews March 28, 1979 edition - TMIUploaded byAndrea Gillhoolley
- Modeling and Position Control of Mobile RobotUploaded byAmin Eslami

- Feedback Control SchemesUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Proportional Navigation Guidance (cite:John H Blakelock)Uploaded byD.Viswanath
- Sliding Mode Control Survey 23 Jun 12Uploaded byD.Viswanath
- Differential Geometry based Control TheoryUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Sliding Mode Control of Electric DrivesUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Notes on Linearisation(H.K.Khalil)Uploaded byD.Viswanath
- Questions and Answers in ThermodynamicsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Matrices and Linear Algebra in Control ApplicationsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Transfer Function Models Representing the Dynamics of a MissileUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Questions and Answers in AerodynamicsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile Roll Control Part IIUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile Control Part IUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Notes on Linear Multivariable Control TheoryUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile Roll Control Part IV -Modern Control ApproachUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile Roll Control-High Frequency ModelUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Matlab Simulations for Basic Proportional NavigationUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile AutopilotUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Proportional Navigation based on Tactical Msl Guidance by ZarchanUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Introduction to Basics of Missile Guidance using Proportional NavigationUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Proportional NavigationUploaded byD.Viswanath
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's PITCH AUTOPILOTUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile System DesignUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Extended State Observer based ControllerUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Chattering in Sliding Mode Control and its Reduction - An Overview of MethodsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Missile Autopilot Math ModelingUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Transfer Function Form of Roll DynamicsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Tactical Missile Autopilot DesignUploaded byD.Viswanath
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's ROLL AUTOPILOTUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Scanning SystemsUploaded byD.Viswanath
- Lateral Autopilot NotesUploaded byD.Viswanath

- 4_Ion TATARU, Cosmin-Mihai MIRITOIU, Dan ILINCIOIU - THE VALIDATION OF SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS USING A NUMERICAL METHOD WITH 3D MESHING ELEMENTS.pdfUploaded byjorge
- Pipe AnalysisUploaded bytorredipisa
- Development of a Lightweight Tubular Space FrameUploaded byJony M. Temnikar
- LS Lab1 PrepostUploaded byAbhishek
- A Novel Approach of Power Transformer Diagnostic Using 3D FEM Parametrical ModelUploaded byCristian Liviu
- Accelerating the Vehicle Development Process by Employing EMI and EMC Numerical Analysis Assisted by High Performance ComputingUploaded byBernardo NG
- A Review of Discrete Modeling Techniques for Fracturing Processes in Discontinuous Rock MassesUploaded byAlexander Illidge Araujo
- Msc Thesis(Nilakash Das)Uploaded byGlen Benton
- HM Advanced TrainingUploaded byganeshaero
- HSPF ManualUploaded byankitsaxena123
- ICEM-Intro_14.0_L01_Introduction.pdfUploaded byLam Trinh Nguyen
- Basics of Finite Element Analysis-I - - Assessment-IUploaded byleesoft
- ch08Uploaded bysanhtra
- Notes DixitUploaded byKhalil Alhatab
- Important 12Uploaded byaman mahar
- Roberto LarghettiUploaded bysfofoby
- FeaUploaded bySwarupendra Bhattacharyya
- Polyflow-v12.1-tut09.pdfUploaded bywoongs73
- RottaUploaded byhazoo
- Calculating Excavator Structural StressUploaded byrbachalli
- Analysis of DuctsUploaded byLakshman Reddy
- Free Vibration Analysis of Curved Cellular BridgesUploaded byFeras Temimi
- Feap useUploaded byAsdrúbalAguirreCorrea
- Basic Steps & Analysis During DesignUploaded byNIRISOA NANTENAINA
- Structural and Thermal Analysis of a Single Plate Dry Friction Clutch Using Finite Element Method (Fem)Uploaded bydbpublications
- SMiRT-23_Paper_552Uploaded bySamul Tyagi
- audi cfdUploaded byMayra Zezatti
- l04_simulation_sheetmetalforming_2.pdfUploaded byNhan Le
- Cfd PresentationUploaded bySubhasis Sen
- Matlab TestUploaded byIgor Wosniak