5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology

http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 1/7
The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration
by Mark Fijor
[1]
| Mar 18, 2013 | Professional Development
[2]
, TPACK
[3]
| 4 comments
Over the last few months I have attended and presented several educational technology
conferences and presentations. In each of the presentations, the presenters have shared
experiences and tools that have changed their teaching, improved student engagement,
and demonstrated students owning their learning; all while making it look easy. As a
presenter, I feel challenged to make whatever tool I am demonstrating look easy to use
and implement in the classroom. But I think it is time I let you in on a little secret;
integrating technology into the classroom isnt always easy. In fact, integrating any
technology into the classroom can be messy, clumsy, challenging and downright
frustrating.
Teachers who are exposed to all of these new tools and ideas with each presentation
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 2/7
have the potential of finding out that using these tools and ideas in the classroom do
not always work out the same way they are presented, and that can lead to frustration
and potentially giving up on an idea. Dont get me wrong, it is good to be exposed to
new things. But as a professional development provider and presenter it is my job to
not only show what is possible, but to equip people with the necessary knowledge and
skills to be able to execute those ideas.
The Problem
In many presentations, workshops, or even Tweets, we are limited to a finite amount of
time where we have to introduce a tool or concept, demonstrate it, and inspire you to
want to use it. While it is important to share personal experiences in those
presentations, it is easy to leave out some of the struggles and learning that was
necessary to get to the point of presenting it for fear of not appearing as an expert. The
trade-off at times is not equipping educators with the necessary knowledge and skills
needed to implement the technology in their classrooms. Additionally, many would
probably be overwhelmed by a highly technical or step-by-step set of instructions.
When educators take what they have seen back to the classroom, they may have an idea
of the lesson they would like to teach, but are unprepared to troubleshoot any technical
issues. Conversely, while they may have an understanding of the tool, they may not
have a strong understanding of the pedagogical implications of what a tool for allows.
For example, if a teacher sees an example of Google Docs as a collaborative writing
application where all students can edit at the same time, having 8th graders working
simultaneously on writing may look very different than 2nd graders attempting the
same thing.
The reality is there is just not enough time to present every variable of a lesson using
technology. Nor should there be an expectation that teachers know every variable before
using a tool in the classroom.
TPACK
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 3/7
[4]
Source: http://tpack.org/
As I have written on this website
[5]
, TPACK stands for Technological, Pedagogical, and
Content Knowledge. This framework looks at each of these domains of knowledge, and
how they overlap with each other within a given context. It can be an important tool
when addressing the problem I have just presented.
While it is impossible in a short period of time to teach or explain all of the possible
technical and pedagogical knowledge needed to integrate a tool into the classroom, it is
possible to start with essential knowledge.By introducing teachers to TPACK, and
giving them the essential knowledge necessary to get started using the tool, we can help
to ease frustrations and increase the likelihood of success.
Technological Knowledge (TK)
The first and most important thing to understand is that teachers should not be
expected to be experts of a particular technology tool, especially when first learning it.
Mastering a tool and understanding every nuance of a tool can take years, and that is if
the tool doesnt change during that time. To use a tool, here are three pieces of essential
knowledge and questions that teachers must know to use a tool in their classroom.
Technological Essential Knowledge
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 4/7
1. Know how to Undo/Fix Mistakes
While this may seem simple, it has been one of the biggest sources of frustrations for
teachers using new tools in the classroom. Students make mistakes, and thats OK. Most
good technology tools have a way to undo or go back to fix a mistake. When learning a
new tool, this is the most important piece of information to share with teachers. By
providing teachers with this knowledge, it allows them to pre-teach or easily correct
issues that could otherwise put a lesson in jeopardy and help ease frustration while
students are learning the tool.
2. Know how to share/export
Once students create something with technology, the next important step is
understanding what to do with it next. Will they email it to you? Is there a website they
will post to? These are important questions, and each application may act a little
differently when sharing or exporting. This is a crucial piece of information that a
teacher must have to complete a lesson, and one that may cause frustration it has not
been taught/shared.
3. Know the accessibility of the tool
How will students access this tool? Do they need a login? Is it a freemium tool that
will only allow partial usability for free? It can be an extremely frustrating experience to
learn about a tool only to find out the functionality of it is limited by cost or other
limitations. Will students need email addresses? Are these sites blocked by a district
web-filter? Teachers should know this information before beginning to use a tool. It is
important for teachers to learn how students will access and get started using the tool.
These three pieces of knowledge do not include all of the technical steps in a given
lesson, but they do provide foundational knowledge for teachers to begin using the tool
in the classroom. Messy, in this case, can be OK. Teachers should explore the tool as
well as encouraging students to do the same. That type of discovery learning, combined
with this foundational knowledge will help to make integrating the tool into the
classroom a much easier process.
In addition to this essential foundational knowledge, it is important that teachers ask
the following questions of themselves when planning to use a technology tool.
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 5/7
Technological Essential Questions
1. What skills or information do I need to use this tool?
After establishing the essential knowledge, teachers should identify questions or skills
that they would like to learn more about. These types of skills may include specific
operations with the technology, or reflect a personal willingness to use the tool on their
own.
2. What skills do my students need to use this tool?
While we expect students to be digital natives, the reality is they still need support
and teaching of technological skills and concepts. When introducing a tool to students,
it is important to consider what skills they may need to use the tool, and if those skills
have been taught before. For example, the transition from Microsoft Office to Google
Docs may be an easy transition because of the similar interface and operations.
However, teaching students to use something like a Prezi is radically different that a
PowerPoint Presentation. These are important considerations that will help in the
planning of a lesson.
Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK)
For the purposes of this article, we will not explore pedagogical and content knowledge.
However, we will explore what happens when technology is overlapped with pedagogy.
No doubt, adding technology can change the way teachers teach and students learn. Just
like the technological knowledge, it is impossible to teach all of pedagogical
implications of adding technology however, we can address the ways technology can be
integrated and what essential questions to ask when integrating technology.
The 4 Cs of Technology Integration
The easiest way to look at the role of technology is to understand that it is a tool that
amplifies inherent abilities. Specifically, when integrating technology into the
classroom it can amplify 4 student abilities. Those are the abilities to:
Consume Content
Create Content
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 6/7
Collaborate
Communicate
From a pedagogical perspective, technology can alter or change students abilities to do
each of the 4 Cs. When presenting new tools, it is important then to address which Cs
the tool highlights or improves, and how it impacts the learning. These should be
explicitly addressed and explained to give the teacher an understanding of how the tool
may be used, drawing on their prior pedagogical knowledge.
TPK Essential Questions
When planning to use technology, it is important to ask the following questions:
1. What does the learning look like?
This is important from an instructional side, as well as from the student learning
perspective. Will students work collaboratively? Will the lesson be instructor led? These
are vital questions to ask prior to using technology in a lesson, and one not often
discussed in depth at conferences and presentations. For example, a presenter may say
students worked collaboratively, but they may not expand on what the collaboration
looked like or even how students are grouped. It is important to ask this question when
learning about new tools, as they will help shape how the lesson is designed as well as
relieve some of the messiness discussed earlier.
2. How will this tool change the learning?
This answer may not always be initially apparent, but it is important to address the
possibilities. As mentioned before, if technology amplifies an ability, what ability are
you amplifying? For example if students are communicating, then one of the changes
may be that they can publish or share thoughts with a wider audience. How do you plan
for this in a lesson? When presenting new tools, asking these questions and providing a
partial answer will help teachers understand why they should use this tool, and how it
may impact learning. It may also give them more insight into their preparation of the
students for the lesson.
Final Reflections (TPCK)
5/12/2014 The Ugly Truth of Technology Integration - New School Technology | New School Technology
http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2013/03/the-ugly-truth-of-edtech/ 7/7
1. http://www.newschooltechnology.org/author/admin/
2. http://www.newschooltechnology.org/category/professional-development/
3. http://www.newschooltechnology.org/category/tpack/
4. http://www.newschooltechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/tpack-1014x1024.jpg
5. http://www.newschooltechnology.org/2011/07/tpack-and-systemic-technology-integration/
6. https://shareaholic.com/publishers/recommendations/?
src=relatedapp&src_ref=www.newschooltechnology.org
Once a presentation or lesson is complete, it is important to allow time for reflection.
What worked? What didnt work? What would you do differently next year? All of these
are important reflective questions to ask to continue to improve using a tool, or not
continuing to use it all together.
Conclusion
While it still might be a dirty secret that every lesson using technology does not always
work perfectly, hopefully these strategies for looking at technology integration will help
dispel that conception. The truth is just like learning any new skill or tool it takes time.
There will be frustration, messiness and moments of panic, but there can also be great
moments of discovery, sharing, and learning. This process will help to empower
teachers to solve problems and take risks while attempting to use tools without the fear
of failure, which ultimately is a skill we would like to model for students.
So the next time you are attending or presenting at a conference consider the strategies
I have discussed, and hopefully we can make that ugly truth a dirty lie.
You may also like:
[ what's this ]
[6]