position as attractive leisure and business tourism destinations, locations for business and places to study and live. Unlike product and service brands, which are driven by market forces, city branding and place marketing are driven by the need to diversify local economies faced with industrial decline, attract tourism and inward investment, attract INTRODUCTION City branding is on the increase, but can one use strategic branding models developed for goods and services to brand cities? There is wide agreement that places can be marketed and branded like products (Aaker, 1996; Keller, 2001, 2003; Kotler et al., 1993; Matson, 1994). But little empirical research was found to support this assertion or to identify how to brand a city successfully. 242 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) City branding: Can goods and services branding models be used to brand cities? Received (in revised form): 1st December, 2004 Brenda Parkerson is an honorary research fellow of Aston University Business School, working in the creative and cultural industries for Birmingham City Council. Her research centres on branding places. She began her career as a classical ballet dancer and, after studying lm at Columbia University, moved to Germany where she established herself as a director and producer of documentaries. Her current work involves place branding through cultural programmes and capacity building, business development and social inclusion in the creative industries. John Saunders is Professor of Marketing, Head of Aston Business School, Pro-vice Chancellor of Aston University and Dean of the Senate of the Chartered Institute of Marketing. His research centres on strategy and product management and includes branding, marketing communications, market models and business incompetence. He has published over 100 learned papers that have appeared in the worlds leading journals in marketing and other disciplines. Along with Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong and Veronica Wong, Professor Saunders writes Europes best-selling marketing text, Principles of Marketing: The European Edition, which now appears in ten languages. Abstract A citys branding is investigated using generic product and services branding models. Two generic branding models and tourism segmentation models guide an investigation into city branding as it should be and as it is using Birmingham, England as a case study. The unique characteristics of city brands are identied and Kellers Brand Report Card provides a theoretical framework for building a picture of the brand-building activity taking place in the city. Four themes emerge and are discussed: 1) the impact of a network on brand models developed for organisations; 2) segmentation of brand elements; 3) corporate branding; and 4) the political dimension. A conclusion is that city branding would be more effective if the systems and structures of generic branding models were adopted. Keywords: City branding, place branding, Birmingham brand, networks Brenda Parkerson MBA, ACIM Birmingham City Council BMAG, Chamberlain Square, Birmingham B13 3DH, UK. Tel: 44 0121 464 6166 e-mail: bparkerson@ blueyonder.co.uk Report Card as a theoretical framework to establish to what extent brand-building activity is taking place. Four general categories of issues are discussed: the network, brand elements and segmentation, corporate brand and the political dimension. BRANDING CITIES Are core branding concepts transferable to cities? At their most basic level brands are understood in terms of their identifying functions and potential for differentiation. Brand as logo and brand as product are common interpretations. De Chernatony (1992: 3) argues that brands are complex identities that exist in the minds of consumers. Referring to Meadows he states that branding is not something done to customers, but rather something they do things with and adds that consumers interpretations of brands may not be what the marketer intended. Drawing on the classical branding literature, the benets of product branding are summarised as: encoding and retrieval cues, heuristic cues for evaluation and choice decisions (Cohen and Basu, 1987) identication functions, added value, credibility guarantee and intangible value (Murphy, 1992) trustworthy badge of origin and promise of performance (Feldwick, 1991) facilitate the consumer choice process and make it more effective (Doyle, 1989). These benets are relevant to city brands. City brands such as New York, Paris or Rome are clearly identiable and each makes a specic and unique promise that aids the decision-making process. The imagery conjured up by the mere mention of these cities names adds hallmark events and conventions and win economic prizes (eg European Capital of Culture) (Kotler et al., 1993; Matson, 1994). In Europe, national and EU directives play a key role through legislation and funding (Greenbaum and Bondonio, 2003). As with product and service brands the bottom line is economic, but the processes involved in strategic branding of cities are characterised by complexity and constrained by the political dimension. The literature on strategic branding is extensive and backed by empirical research focusing largely on fast-moving consumer goods. With the growth of services marketing, research is moving beyond the fast-moving consumer goods model (De Chernatony and McDonald, 2001; Olins, 2003b). Place branding is a relatively new area of research. While not addressing branding specically, there is an abundance of work in the area of place and city marketing largely from three disciplines: urban development, tourism and marketing management. Works on city and place marketing in the area of marketing management are fewer and less grounded in empirical research than works in the areas of urban development and tourism. This study investigates the relevance of product and services branding models to cities. Two generic branding models developed by De Chernatony and Riley (1998) and Laforet and Saunders (1994) and two tourism segmentation models developed by Jafari (1982 and 1987, cited in Jafari, 1995) are used to determine the unique characteristics of city brands. Birmingham is examined in a case study looking at sources of brand equity, the desirability of a corporate or umbrella brand in a city context and the impact of the political dimension on strategic branding approaches. City brand practitioners in Birmingham are surveyed using Kellers (2000) Brand Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 243 City branding form of extending city brands was commonplace when America was being colonised (eg New Englands Boston, Hull, Plymouth and Worcester). The Brand Report Card operationalises Kellers understanding of brand building. This practical approach has ten characteristics that companies must achieve in order to create and maintain strong brands (Keller, 2000). The brand excels at delivering benets customers truly desire. The brand stays relevant. The pricing strategy is based on consumers perceptions of value. The brand is properly positioned. The brand is consistent. The brand portfolio and hierarchy make sense. The brand makes use of and coordinates a full repertoire of marketing activities to build equity. Brand managers understand what the brand means to consumers. The brand is given proper support that is sustained in the long term. Sources of brand equity are monitored. Keller suggests rating a brand on a scale of one to ten on these ten characteristics to gain an understanding of how the brand is congured and identify areas in which it excels or that need improvement. This approach has been used to investigate the Birmingham brand. The double vortex model De Chernatony and Rileys (1998) research on the mental models brand managers and brand consultants use to help them make sense of the components of a brand led to their development of the double vortex brand model. In this model the elements of the brand are divided into rational elements brand intangible value to the experience, often at a premium price. Evidence of this can be found in businesses attaching names of strong city brands to their products (at no cost) to lend them credibility, status and other positive associations even when the product has no real connection with the city. Examples of this are Chicago Pizza, the restaurant chain, or Paris, a small clothing store in Birmingham. Keller (2003) identies the advantages of strong brands as: greater loyalty and less vulnerability to competitive actions and crises larger margins greater trade cooperation and support increased marketing effectiveness possible licensing opportunities additional brand extension opportunities. Are these concepts transferable to cities? Loyalty to a city may show itself through repeat visits or civic pride. Less vulnerability to competitive actions may translate into a business not relocating when a seemingly better option is offered, or an image not being damaged despite bad press. Larger margins are related to premium prices through brand equity and can be seen in higher property prices in cities with strong reputations. Greater trade cooperation and support may be revealed in local businesses promoting the city and cooperating with city strategies. Increased marketing effectiveness can be achieved through association with a city brand and capitalised on across city-wide activity. Private sector interest in a city brand can lead to opportunities for local authorities to raise revenues through licensing their brands. Additional brand extension opportunities are more difcult to apply to city brands. But while perhaps not relevant today, a 244 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders individuals, businesses, public services, local government and partnerships with varied and often competing interests. Castells (2000) denes a network as a set of organisational nodes and argues that networks have always had an extraordinary capacity and extraordinary problems in becoming forms for implementing human activity. Cooperation is identied as a key characteristic, with each node being dependent on the other nodes for the network to function. Networks can organise resources and activity, and will reorganise themselves rather than clash against other structures or organisations. This makes them exible and adaptable. The problem with networks is that they have an inherent difculty in focusing resources in order to maintain unity and accomplish their task. Networks are good at decentralising, but they are not good at coordinating and centralising the as it is understood within the organisation and irrational elements brand as it is understood in the consumers mind. This model addresses brands from both the managers and the consumers positions, and makes clear the differences in the processes and the interrelatedness of the activities of both positions (Figure 1). Organisation versus network In contrast to brand leading companies, cities do not have a single body or clarity of focus to drive branding. With no organisational structure to manage the mechanisms needed to build brand equity, the double vortex model does not t city branding. The uniqueness of a city brand lies primarily in its form as a network rather than an organisation with clear boundaries and internal structures. A city is an intricate network of Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 245 City branding Figure 1: Double vortex model Values Mission Vision Corporate culture Heritage Naming Functional Service Risk policy capacity reducer Legal Crisp Personality communicator Time Time/experience Confidence Rational: Emotional: Performance Psychosocial match Stakeholder value Brand inside firm Response relationship Brand inside consumers mind Shorthand device Consumer perceptions approaches are likely to encounter similar problems when applied to networks and cities. The double vortex model has been extended to introduce the unique dynamic of the city as a network (Figure 2). The problem of the lack of organisational boundaries now becomes evident. The rational elements of a city sit not just within one rm, but within a network of many organisations and individuals. Each may have its own unique vision, mission, values, corporate culture, heritage, functional capability, policies, services and personality. They may work in partnership with one another, they may be competitors or they may not know the other exists. All will in some way and to varying degrees inform consumers about the city brand and the consumer will perceive this as a whole. This dynamic is mirrored in the response relationships between consumers and the brand. There is an inherent lack of stability decision-making process or at allocating resources to a particular purpose. Further, Castells (2000) argues that beyond a certain complexity it becomes practically impossible to manage all the different components of a network and to get them all to work towards a common purpose. The larger a network is, the more difcult it is to manage by conventional means (Castells, 2000). In an analysis of city branding, marketing consultant Berci Florian (2002) retains faith in market-based planning for cities and identies differentiation as the key to satisfying increasingly individualistic consumer demand. Taking the opposite stance, architect Rem Koolhaas (2001) states that it is futile to plan a city; cities are self-organising urban life forms that have outstripped any means of conventional organisation or control. Koolhaass (2001) view and Castellss (2000) concept of the network undermine market-planning approaches requiring coordinated effort towards a common purpose. Strategic branding 246 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders Figure 2: Extended double vortex model Response relationship Response relationship Response relationship Response relationship Response relationship Response relationship Confidence Rational: Emotional: Psychosocial Stakeholder value Time Time/experience Brand inside the city Response relationship Response relationship Response relationship Response Brand inside consumers mind Shorthand device Performance match P o l i t i c a l
d i m e n s i o n C o n s u m e r
p e r c e p t i o n s The important differentiating elements for a city are likely to be the socio-cultural and man-made background tourism elements. Their uniqueness will be the key in providing sustainable competitive advantage over other cities and in creating brand equity. Jafari segments the ordinary world from the non-ordinary world. This can be applied to city brands needing to deliver two unique brand promises to two unique categories of audience: the tourist and the non-tourist (Jafari, 1987, cited in Jafari, 1995). Corporate branding The role of the organisation At rst glance, city brands resemble corporate brands and brand consultants do refer to city brands as corporate brands (Olins, 2003a). But do they function for a city as a corporate brand functions for organisations and their products? The use of the term corporate brand by brand consultants for a city brand has its roots in graphic design. Balmer has commented that the business identity concept is ubiquitous and has been used recklessly in practitioner circles and to a lesser degree by scholars. In practitioner literature, identity might be dened in terms of the fundamental attributes of the organisation while identity solutions are explained solely in terms of graphic design (Balmer, 2001). A corporate brand acts as a seamless umbrella that encompasses all the brands in the portfolio (Keller, 2000). Brand structure refers to how a corporate brand is deployed across a product portfolio. It provides a mechanism for controlling the level of association a consumer makes between a product and the corporate image, and determines the relationship between the two. A content analysis of grocery brands conducted by Laforet and and consistency in a city brand. The question is, can the standard mechanisms for managing a product or service brand (sequential planning stages: vision, mission, values and corporate culture) work for a city brand? Brand elements and segmentation There is little known about why some city brands are more successful than others. From an urban tourism perspective, research points to a rich and compelling history and interesting cultural offerings as critical success factors. Whether a city possesses these characteristics determines its potential for urban leisure tourism. National capitals also have an advantage over non-capitals (Lennon and Seaton, 1998). Segmenting a citys offering into brand elements can result in a better understanding of its unique characteristics. City brand elements can be segmented further into tangibles and intangibles. Jafaris (1982) tourism segmentation model, although dated, remains a useful tool for analysing city brands and determining sources of brand equity and competitive advantage. Tourism elements are segmented into products used by tourists and residents plus background tourism elements which can be either natural (climate, scenery), socio-cultural (culture, history) or man-made (buildings, shrines, shopping centres). Background tourism elements are not necessarily conned to the city, but can extend beyond city limits. With adequate transport infrastructure even a city with few attractions can become a dormitory for the surrounding region. Jafaris model requires extending in order to reect the needs of residents, businesses, investors and students (Jafari, 1982, cited in Jafari, 1995). Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 247 City branding product but also the people, programmes, systems, values and culture of the organisation (Aaker, 1996). A city does not share these organisational boundaries and the systems, values and culture that evolve within them. A city brand may be the responsibility of a particular local government function such as tourism or economic development, but it does not function within the boundaries of an organisation in the same way that a product or service brand does. Nonetheless, the corporate brand will identify the people, values and culture of the city. Increasingly, companies are realising that their staff are the embodiment of their brand. Unique corporate culture can be the source of competitive advantage for a corporate brand. There is growing interest in orchestrating staff to deliver the brand promise (De Chernatony, 2002). The people of a city are a unique element of a city brand and in many ways deliver the brand, but can (or should) a population be orchestrated to deliver the brand promise? Balmer extends corporate-level brands beyond the company denition to include groups of companies and countries, regions and cities and argues for a radical reappraisal of the traditional marketing framework (Balmer, 2003). Strategic competence and the political dimension There is a fundamental dilemma underlying strategic competence in an organisation between the extent of challenge and ambition in goal setting versus the ability to mobilise commitments for achieving them over the required time period (Murthy, 1987: 12). This dilemma is more problematic in a complex city network. The impact of the political dimension on strategic competence has been Saunders (1994) identied six approaches. Corporate-dominant approach (eg Kelloggs corn akes) was found to be rare. House-dominant approach (eg Quaker uses corporate brand on cereals but Fisher Price on toys) was more common. Dual brands (Rowntrees Quality Street), where two brand names are equally prominent, were most common. Endorsed brands (eg Scotch Tape/3M), where the brand name is dominant and is endorsed by a less prominent corporate or house brand, were less popular than dual branding. Brand dominant (eg Mars and Procter & Gamble use this approach) are stand-alone brands where the maker is not in a prominent position. Furtive brands do not show the maker at all (eg used by pet food makers to disassociate pet food from human food). These structures can also be found in nancial services, automotive and luxury goods sectors (Olins, 2003b). Corporate, house or even furtive brands are positioned rmly within the boundaries of the organisation both strategically and operationally, and deployment of the corporate brand is determined by the organisation (Aaker, 1996; De Chernatony, 2002; Keller, 2003; Laforet and Saunders, 1999). This is not the case with a city brand. City brands are adopted by independent organisations and agencies that choose to be associated with the brand. Even across local government it is not a given that the brand will be adopted. In Aakers denition a corporate brand identies the corporation behind the product and represents not only the 248 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders time, it is recognised that the city council, through its elected representation, legitimises the partnership. Effective city-wide partnerships have strong political leadership at the most senior level, but it is important that the local authority does not play the lead role (Aulakh et al., 2002). It would seem that through partnership working cities try to compensate for the lack of organisational boundaries and corporate strategic centre. Partnerships may provide an appropriate framework within which brand strategy and appropriate behaviour can evolve. The following propositions have emerged for investigation. Proposition 1: Because of the network form it is likely that strategic brand models developed for organisations will need adaptation for cities. Proposition 2: Deconstructing a city into its brand elements is likely to reveal the extent of the complexity of a city brand and the need for segmentation to identify sources of brand equity and the desires and needs of the target markets. Proposition 3: Deployment of a city corporate brand is decided by individual organisations within a network rather than by a strategic decision-making body. This is likely to impact on the way the corporate brand is deployed and the frequency of its deployment. Proposition 4: The role of local government and issues that undermine strategic competence may limit the extent to which strategic brand models can be implemented. METHODOLOGY To determine the relevance of strategic branding models developed for goods outlined by Murthy (1987). Strategic competence of public sector enterprises is low because: the dominance of the political process in the strategic decision-making process seeks ambitious and visible goals, but leaves the mobilisation of commitments to bureaucratic processes for most public sector enterprises survival is more about personal careers and reputations than organisational survival in the economic sense; conict between managers, bureaucrats and politicians in their methods, motivations and characteristics can lead to a lack of alignment of their interests setting goals is done without alignment of beliefs and values of managers, bureaucrats and politicians lack of leadership among decision makers means there is no one to infuse appropriate values, align interests and overcome inherent conicts between managers, bureaucrats and politicians. City strategy is primarily formulated by local government under regulation of central government in consultation with the private sector. Partnership working underpins many of the key provisions set out in the Local Government Act 2000 (Calpin, 2000). Crucial to successful partnership working is effective leadership, as it increases the visibility of the partnership, promotes shared ownership of objectives and persuades reluctant partners. Without leadership to bring about a common sense of purpose and develop a shared vision, partnership working is likely to fail (Young, 2000). In the context of a city-wide partnership, city council dominance is seen to generate distrust. At the same Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 249 City branding ofcials direct control over services and budgets. The traditional form of leadership of local government in the UK is a leader of the council elected annually by the majority party or coalition. Since 1999, UK legislation allows for powerful US-style elected mayors. Triggered by a residents referendum or a voters petition, Birmingham residents voted against an elected mayor and for a Leader of the Council (BBC, 1999; Parker, 2003). Birmingham city brand elements Tangibles Birmingham is located in the centre of England. The city is known for its industrial heritage as manufacturers of jewellery and guns from the 17th century to the 19th century and automobiles in the 20th century. The city once enjoyed a good reputation (Queen Victoria bought jewellery made in Birmingham), but from a modern leisure tourism perspective this history is perhaps not as appealing as the histories of Amsterdam, Dublin or London, which are among the top ten European destinations. Key success factors in urban tourism are a rich history and culture (Lennon and Seaton, 1998). Birminghams difculty in competing in this arena is reected in low levels of non-business overnight and international visitors to the city (Marketing Birmingham, 2003b). In the 1960s, Birminghams city centre underwent major redevelopment. The new Bullring, the Rotunda and the inner ring road were built. The inner ring road was designed to bring cars in and out of the city quickly. It became known as the concrete collar. To cross the road, pedestrians had to use tunnels that became targets for criminal activity. The concrete collar isolated areas outside and services to cities the following have been carried out. A case study of the Birmingham brand that examines key issues impacting on a city brand. The case study seeks to build a picture of the brand-building activity taking place within the city and to what extent that activity is a strategic and coordinated effort. A survey of Birmingham brand practitioners using the Brand Report Card (Keller, 2000) as a theoretical framework. Semi-structured interviews with Birmingham local government ofcials illuminating the city context and political dimension. Secondary data: documentation, perception research, MORI polls (British opinion survey) and statistics. It is acknowledged that the conclusions drawn for the city of Birmingham may not be relevant for other cities. For a broader set of results, case studies of more cities would be useful. A CASE STUDY: THE BIRMINGHAM BRAND Background With a population of approximately 1 million, Birmingham is the capital of the West Midlands region. This city-region has a population of approximately 3 million and is the 12th largest in Europe (Interact- Network, 2003). The Birmingham City Council (BCC) employs about 50,000 people and is Europes largest city council. It has an annual budget of approximately e3.5bn (Birmingham City Council, 2003a). The council has recently devolved many public services to the constituencies, giving elected 250 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders runway has recently been approved (Locate in Birmingham, 2003a, 2003b; BBC, 2003). Birminghams central location is a key source of brand equity, and this is supported by large-scale convention centres and hotel infrastructure. Surveys show a large percentage of domestic business visitors. Key trends in the nancial and professional services sector (the fastest-growing sectors accounting for 76 per cent of employment) are further sources of brand equity (Marketing Birmingham, 2003a; Birmingham City Council, 2003a). A fundamental characteristic of Birmingham is social inequality. This is due to highly skilled and highly paid jobs being held by people living outside the city and commuting in while large proportions of Birminghams own citizens live in deprived communities and remain unemployed or on low incomes (Interact-Network, 2003; Aulakh et al., 2002). Intangible elements The non-ordinary world of the tourist. Results of a 2003 national survey of 2,013 UK adults revealed that Birmingham was not seen as a leading European or must-see city. Arts and culture were not perceived as world class. Birmingham rated high on being a city full of colour and enthusiasm. People who lived or had lived in the city had more positive perceptions than those who had not. The positive impact of proximity in city brand perceptions was also found to be true for the city of Hong Kong (Marketing Birmingham, 2003a; Burson-Marsteller et al., 2001). The ordinary world of the resident. Residents perceptions are surveyed annually on a wide range of dimensions. The lowest ratings were the ring road from the city-centre core and those areas began to fall into decline. With the urban development of the 1960s and the economic recession of the 1980s, Birmingham became a bad product combined with a bad economy (Locate in Birmingham, 2003b). Since 1987 new convention and arts centres have been built, canal areas have been developed and tourism infrastructure has improved. Substantial investment has been made in the citys retail facilities and Birmingham has established a reputation for business tourism, but the city still carries the outdated reputation of being a post-war concrete jungle (Marketing Birmingham, 2003a, 2003b; Swingler, 2003). In 2003 visitor numbers to the citys attractions reveal that all but two of them are down from the previous year. These two are Cadbury World and Sarehole Mill (the inspiration of Tolkien) (Marketing Birmingham, 2003b). The brand strength of both Cadbury and Tolkien (particularly in the light of recent lm successes) is likely to be related to their increased visitor numbers. None of the other attractions come remotely close to enjoying the global brand awareness and positive associations of these two attractions. They are also unique to the location, unlike the science museum or the aquarium. Cadbury and Tolkien are global brands and cultural exports which can attract national and international visitors. Birmingham does not have many of these. Birminghams central location benets domestic business tourism and locating a UK business. It is relatively close to London and sits in the centre of the UK national motorway and rail network. Birmingham International Airport, the UKs fastest growing airport, however, has limited direct ights to major international destinations. A second Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 251 City branding of priorities of the two worlds in an urban tourism destination. The intangible elements apply to both worlds. A tourist may prioritise nightlife over employment, while the resident may prioritise employment. It becomes evident that a brand delivering to one of these worlds might disappoint the other. The question of whether or not a single brand image can meet the needs of both these worlds must be asked. The impact of the city council on tangible elements The impact of the city council on brand elements is immense; it comes closest to being the organisation behind the brand. The city council also seems to be in the best position to manage the brand strategically. But the power of local authorities has been systematically reduced by central government over the years. The BCCs role has shifted from service delivery to that of a facilitator of on safety, cleanliness, greenery and housing. The highest ratings for 2002 were on quality shopping, universities and colleges, conferences and education. Residents greatest concerns were with cleanliness, young people with nothing to do, crime and speeding. The polls revealed that two-thirds of residents speak highly of the city. This is reective of loyalty, psychological bond and engagement (Birmingham City Council, 2003b). Overlapping worlds. The ordinary world of the resident and non-ordinary world of the tourist are dialectically opposed. Residents and tourists co-exist in the same place, however, and many tangible elements serve both these markets. The two perceptual categories of non-ordinary and ordinary represent two perspectives and two sets of priorities. In Birmingham, the image campaign focuses on the non-ordinary world. The diagram in Figure 3 has been devised to illustrate the opposing sets 252 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders Figure 3: Priorities in the ordinary/non-ordinary worlds Tangibles Intangibles Image, style, personality Awareness, recall, recognition Perceived quality, consideration Emotional and self -expressive elements Loyalty, bond, engagement Hotels, airports and trains Culture, arts, history nightlife, shopping Safety Cleanliness Transportation Education, health, housing, employment, business, infrastructure N o n - o r d i n a r y
w o r l d T o u r i s t L o w
P r i o r i t y
H i g h L o w
P r i o r i t y
H i g h R e s i d e n t O r d i n a r y
w o r l d consumers desire and this information informs strategy. Brand building requires the organisation to maximise the customers product and service experiences. Maximising the experiences of a city is not centrally managed. Marketing Birmingham provides tourism services that maximise the visitors experience of the brand. For the rest of the citys consumers there are a multitude of public, private and voluntary sector organisations that deliver services. Each has their own strategies and capabilities for maximising product and service experiences. The BCC has inuence and in some cases power over some aspects of this activity through funding initiatives, policy and legislation. This places it in a key position to maximise peoples experience of the city. The BCC conducts annual opinion polls to identify residents perceptions and levels of satisfaction on key public services, which informs council strategy and policy. Marketing Birmingham carries out perception research. Progress is measured against objectives (eg Birmingham a world-class city), however, rather than visitors desires. Locate in Birmingham gathers relevant information on an ad hoc basis about key businesses and issues in the city, which informs its inward investment and business retention strategy. The brand stays relevant Urban regeneration and cultural initiatives have improved Birmingham and continue to do so. This is informed largely by market conditions and trends in urban planning, regeneration and design. In the context of the city network, private and public sector organisations will also contribute on an individual basis to keeping the city brand relevant by keeping their own brands relevant. partnerships. Some BCC partnerships are effective. For example, the city planning department brought intensely competitive private sector developers to the table to build jointly a major shopping development (Locate in Birmingham, 2003b). Less effective is the partnership with Marketing Birmingham, as indicated by the councils reluctance to adopt the new brand developed by Marketing Birmingham and Marketing Birminghams refusal to cooperate fully with the councils scrutiny procedures (Dale, 2003). Building the Birmingham brand Three organisations/departments in Birmingham were identied that engage in marketing and branding the city. They are Marketing Birmingham for leisure and business tourism, Locate in Birmingham for inward investment and business retention and the BCC for product development, resident services and corporate planning. None of the agencies emphasised Birmingham as a place to study. Locate in Birmingham is the BCCs inward investment team, and the BCC is a key stakeholder in and part funder of Marketing Birmingham. Other stakeholders include the NEC group (convention centres), hotels and city-centre retailers. Marketing Birmingham has developed the city corporate brand and is the brand guardian. Although the three organisations are interrelated, their work is fragmented and not integrated through a holistic approach to branding. Brand activity in Birmingham has been investigated using the Brand Report Card (Keller, 2000), as outlined below. The brand excels at delivering the benets customers truly desire The organisation knows/nds out what Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 253 City branding The brand portfolio and hierarchy make sense A corporate umbrella brand is seen as desirable. One Birmingham respondent wants to see the city branding across a wide range of city organisations in both the public and private sector. But the corporate brand does not create a seamless umbrella for the citys sub-brands. Although the brand designers claim that the new design can be adapted to anyones needs, the options for integrating the corporate brand with the sub-brand are limited and may be inhibiting its adoption (Casteldine, 2003). Issues such as a brands capacity to hold individual niches or the degree to which brands overlap are specic to product and service brands. Overlapping brands in a consumer goods context can translate into cannibalisation and waste. In a city context, overlapping brands may be desirable and indicate a robust competitive sector. Intensity of competition among rivals is one of ve forces that determine the attractiveness of an industry (Porter, 2001). Intensity of competition also determines the attractiveness of a place in the context of international marketing (Porter, 1990). Here the concept of place as product comes into conict with the dynamic of place as market. The brand makes use of and coordinates a full repertoire of marketing activities to build brand equity Marketing Birmingham and Locate in Birmingham engage in a wide range of marketing activity. The Birmingham corporate brand has been designed to give adopters choices in colour schemes and straplines to suit their needs, but it is more about achieving adoption by a diverse audience than about maximising brand awareness. The pricing strategy is based on consumers perceptions of value General perceptions of the price of Birmingham vary according to visitors place of origin. In the UK Birmingham is seen to be good value for money, while Europeans nd it expensive. For businesses, ofce space is more expensive than in Manchester or Liverpool, but decidedly cheaper and of better quality than in London. Birminghams higher price is seen as positive and as reecting demand. The concept of optimising price, cost and quality across the range of a citys offerings is unrealistic in a complex city network. This is one element of the Brand Report Card that does not apply well to city branding. The brand is properly positioned Benchmarking has been carried out through MORI polling to establish points of parity and points of difference in key city services with other UK cities. In addition, the regional tourist board compares Birmingham with other UK and European destinations on measures such as hotel protability and visitor numbers. Locate in Birmingham uses economic data to determine Birminghams position (Locate in Birmingham, 2003a; Birmingham City Council, 2003a). The brand is consistent Brand meaning varies across the three organisations. For inward investment the new brand image is perceived as frivolous and Birminghams business community is unhappy with the focus on tourism (Locate in Birmingham, 2003b). The BCC has rejected the brand image for not representing the reality in deprived neighbourhoods (Birmingham City Council, 2004). 254 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders receives substantial additional funding from the European Union. With the enlargement of the EU this funding is expected to be reduced. Exit strategies include increased private sector support and central government support. The political dimension is not perceived as a threat to long-term brand strategy, although recent enquiry by Tory and Liberal Democrat councillors into the workings and nances of Marketing Birmingham would suggest otherwise (Dale, 2003; Dale, 2004). The company monitors sources of brand equity The brand guidelines distributed by Marketing Birmingham dene the meaning of the brand, but this meaning is not aligned with a wider city agenda (eg business, investment and the community). The BCC, Marketing Birmingham and Locate in Birmingham track performance on a regular basis. Brand equity reports as such are not done. The BCCs polling results inform policy and strategy and are made public. Marketing Birmingham distributes the results of its research to its partners and they are made public. Locate in Birmingham publishes and distributes economic data to the business community. Branding in a city context In Birmingham, activity contributing to the delivery of brand benets (eg positioning, consistency, coordinated activity, understanding brand meaning and monitoring) was found to be fragmented. Three organisations are involved in these activities for four target markets. The BCC targeting residents. The brand managers understand what the brand means to consumers Perception research appears inadequate and fragmented. Little evidence was found to indicate in-depth knowledge and understanding of the core associations people in any of the target markets make with Birmingham. MORI polls show that residents have positive perceptions of the citys shopping facilities, colleges and universities. Perceptions of education, hospitals, attractions and leisure tourism are good, but get worse year on year. The city is not perceived to be green, safe and clean. (Did this information inform Marketing Birminghams Green [Birmingham] billboard portraying the city as a green haven?) Marketing Birminghams research shows that national perceptions have improved slightly, but that arts and culture are still not perceived as world class (Marketing Birmingham, 2003a). Locate in Birmingham does not carry out perception research. In its opinion, that is the work of Marketing Birmingham. Given that Marketing Birmingham focuses on tourism, it is unlikely that it will get relevant data for inward investment or business. The brand is given proper support and that support is sustained over the long run Birmingham has had substantial long-term support from both the public and private sectors in the area of urban regeneration. Levels of support for marketing appear more vulnerable. Core funding for city marketing in the UK tends to come from the local authority, with additional funding achieved through the private sector and regional development agencies. This is the case with Marketing Birmingham. Currently, Marketing Birmingham Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 255 City branding dominance of a city-wide partnership is seen to generate distrust. At the same time, it is recognised that the BCC through its elected representation legitimises the partnership (Aulakh et al., 2002). Effective city-wide partnerships have strong political leadership at the most senior level, but it is also important that the local authority does not play the lead role (Carley et al., 2000). Dominance by the BCC of the CSP may render it a vehicle for achieving BCC objectives and distrust undermines partnership working. The corporate brand In July 2003, after the city lost its bid to be European Capital of Culture, the brand behind the bid was discarded and a new brand was launched. The aim of the new corporate brand is to increase awareness, improve perceptions and achieve adoption by a wide range of organisations across the city. But the brands design may be inhibiting its adoption. To encourage adoption it is crucial to design brands to accommodate a wide range of brand structures and representations of relationships. The Birmingham brand claims to reect the diversity of the city through interchangeable sets of images, words and colour schemes. Adhering to the belief that multiple identities can be abridged within a single brand, it maintains it can be anything anyone wants it to be. The design is unable to accommodate the wide range of relationships between the city and the sub-brands, however, and key stakeholders do not agree with the brands message. If multiple identities cannot be abridged and the single brand is used, then segments of the citys stakeholders may be excluded (Marketing Birmingham, 2003c; Bennett and Koudelova, 2001). In addition to the six brand structures Locate in Birmingham (a department within the BCC) targeting investment and business. Marketing Birmingham targeting tourism (business and leisure). The city as a place to study was not targeted despite a relatively large student population. An effective strategic branding approach would include activity in all relevant target markets and require integration and facilitation from a strategic centre. For a city, this is a structural problem that could be resolved by positioning the marketing function beneath a strategic function that works across the whole range of city sectors. In the UK, the Local Government Act 2000 requires Birmingham to set up a local strategic partnership. Formed in 2001, the City Strategic Partnership (CSP) brings together the citys main institutions and agencies to provide an overall strategic direction for the city and appears to offer an opportunity for a virtual corporate strategic centre within which a city-wide branding programme could reside. The CSP is responsible for: producing the long-term vision for the area (the community strategy) implementing a neighbourhood renewal strategy to achieve improvements in employment, health, housing and environment, education and crime coordinating the work of other partnerships developing public service agreements. Compared to other local strategic partnerships in the UK, the CSP admits to being late to get off the ground (City Strategic Partnership, 2003). Largely funded by the BCC, the CSP is chaired by the leader of the council. BCC 256 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders can compensate for the lack of organisational boundaries and strategic centre; this virtual organisation facilitates the decision-making process and allocation of resources needed to develop and deliver holistic brand strategy. Brand elements and segmentation The segmentation of the Birmingham brand revealed an expansive and complex product and portfolio comparable, perhaps, to a global brand such as Procter & Gamble. Segmentation of city brand elements by target market assists the identication of sources of brand equity. Strategic decision-making bodies should prioritise according to the strength of the element, its potential for adding value, whether or not it can be improved, how much that would cost and how long it would take. Decisions about urban tourism should be informed by climate, scenery and the potential cultural and given historic richness of the location. Tourism in general needs to be considered in terms of a citys ability to deliver the promise of the non-ordinary world. The perceptual categories of the ordinary and non-ordinary worlds segment the brand elements from the perspective of the place consumer. The brand promise for the visitor in the non-ordinary world is likely to be dialectically opposed to that of the resident in the ordinary world. This dilemma raises questions about the desirability of a single corporate identity deployed across a wide range of city brand elements (or sub-brands) with potentially conicting values and core associations. Birminghams strengths lie largely in areas that impact on business tourism, business and inward investment, a central location and proximity to London. Cultural products are in need of identied by Laforet and Saunders (1994), a further brand structure was identied: the NECs and Novotels use of the brand colours and recognisable graphic elements without the logo or name. This associative approach solves a problem for adopters of city brands when corporate-dominant or endorsing structures are inappropriate and house brand approaches do not show enough of a relationship. The brand must have strong associations with the colour and design elements for the association to be extended to the sub-brand. Strong product brands typically have one or two colours so as to enable strong associations (eg CocaCola, Virgin, Orange, Lloyds TSB and MasterCard). In contrast, the Birmingham brand has ve colour schemes with 12 colours each to choose from, making strong associations between colour and brand difcult. DISCUSSION The network The dynamic of a network appears to impact on brand programmes on at least two levels: on how activity is mobilised within the network to develop and deliver brand strategy and programmes (this includes product development, image building and leveraging brand equity) on how the corporate brand can be deployed across the network and brand portfolio. The city as a network poses a unique problem for strategic brand models developed for goods and services, in that networks are not good at centralising the decision-making process or allocating resources to a particular purpose. Partnership working is a mechanism that Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 257 City branding of brand structures determining the relationship of the brands to the city. A citys institutions and organisations often adopt a house brand approach with individual brands showing a loose association with the city. Corporate-dominant brand approaches tend to be used for services the city delivers and for city agencies. Endorsed structures show the citys support for an event or organisation. The way a corporate brand is combined with a product brand reects how the organisation wants the relationship between the product and the organisation to be perceived. The case study of the Birmingham brand revealed the opposite to be true. Brand guidelines may indicate how the brand should and should not be used, but the citys sub-brands (institutions and organisations) can choose to adopt or not to adopt the brand. Corporate branding decisions made in the corporate centre for a product brand may be made externally for a city brand. Unlike product or service brands, the city has little control over the deployment of the corporate brand, leaving city brand practitioners with the challenge of facilitating adoption through inuencing and persuasion. Marketing Birmingham would like to deploy its brand across the city portfolio (Marketing Birmingham, 2003d), but this is proving difcult. The adoption of the brand is often little more than use of the logo as an endorser. To what extent this increases awareness or improves perceptions is questionable. Marketing Birmingham uses the branding consistently for effective business and leisure tourism promotion, and the BCC marketing department uses the brand for its seasonal events campaigns. The inward investment team nd it too frivolous, but has managed to incorporate the logo in black and white and use the brand language mechanism. strengthening before the city can be considered a leading urban tourism destination. Cultural exports such as Cadbury, Tolkien and Jaguar are potential prole raisers and also in need of strengthening. Birmingham has changed the look, feel and functionality of its city centre. Current pressure from local communities has led to a shift in priorities (and resources) from the city centre to the surrounding areas, particularly those that are home to disadvantaged groups. In the context of strategic branding this is product improvement (however crass this may seem). Decisions impacting on the product also impact on how the brand is experienced, processed and understood as a whole in the minds of place consumers. From a holistic branding standpoint, improving deprived neighbourhoods would seem a favourable move, although it is unlikely that improvements are being made for this reason. Some elements of a city cannot be changed. A city is a product of its unique history. The town of Dachau will forever be associated with Nazi concentration camps. A city like Las Vegas is a product of its short history and singularity of purpose. While a citys iconography has a quality of permanence, a citys face can be changed. The originally unpopular decision to build the Eiffel Tower changed Paris irrecoverably, and provided it with an easily recognisable symbol. The seed of the Manhattan skyline was planted long before the invention of the elevator when three city commissioners carved Manhattan up into squares to facilitate the buying and selling of property (Koolhaas, 1994). Corporate brand A city brand portfolio is much like a portfolio of product brands, with a range 258 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders Segal-Horn, 2003). Changing the culture of a city in order to market it more effectively raises ethical questions. At the same time, improving education, skills and employment can improve life for residents, impact on the culture of a city and so improve the brand. In the opinion of brand practitioners in Birmingham, the product Birmingham is better than the perception of Birmingham. Brand perceptions as they exist in consumers minds are real phenomena that are inuenced through their experience and cumulative knowledge of the brand. Cumulative implies the need for a consistent and long-term approach which may prove challenging in a political context. The failure of the Birmingham brand campaign behind the bid for European Capital of Culture has led not only to a new brand, but also to new leadership of Marketing Birmingham; the citys leading businesses have been disgruntled by Marketing Birminghams focus on tourism (Birmingham Post, 2003), and a local election has brought a change in government and new city council leadership. The brand practitioners interviewed for this research are not of the opinion that the political dimension is a threat to the brand programme. But circumstances in Birmingham indicate that municipal branding may well be the political mineeld that one New York City consultant claims it to be (Lefton, 2003). Long-term support of product development has been achieved in Birmingham since 1987. This is thought to be due to strong leadership, effective partnership working and a long-term plan. Leadership is also critical to the success of strategic branding, particularly if the brand programme is delivered through a partnership. Strong leadership can mobilise the brand activity throughout the partnership towards a common goal. Other BCC departments, and much of the business community, have rejected the brand. Abridging multiple identities is a key issue for city brands, and the Birmingham corporate brand tries to achieve this (Bennett and Koudelova, 2001). But in its attempt to be all things for all people, the brand loses sight of its real function, which is to maximise brand awareness. This dilemma, along with the ordinary/non-ordinary dialectic, raises questions about the desirability and achievability of a single corporate brand image for a city. The role of local government (political dimension) The role of local government and public policy in city branding is extensive. A key driver of product development in a UK city is urban regeneration. A local authoritys economic development and city planning functions are central to the development and sustainability of sources of brand equity. Public policy can also impact on a citys cultural products, which are a valuable source of brand equity for urban tourism. Local government can play a key role in supporting and nurturing the cultural life of a city. Further, a citys cultural exports can be exploited, and indeed created, through government support (eg grants for artists and touring programmes). Local government can also play a role in shaping a citys corporate culture (if it can be called this). Like services brands, the value delivery systems in cities are visible and the consumer takes an active part in them, but unlike services, delivery is performed through a network of diverse organisations and individuals rather than an organisation. A solution for service brands may be found in corporate culture (De Chernatony and Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 259 City branding argument for adapting the systems and structures of generic branding models to t city branding. The network Brand models developed for organisations need modication to suit a network better if they are to be of use in a city context. The double vortex model was extended to illustrate this (De Chernatony and Riley, 1998). Two mechanisms for creating a virtual organisation were identied: the elected mayor and the local strategic partnership (LSP). The LSP is the more likely mechanism in the UK because of a lack of tradition with elected mayors. The proximity of the brand programme to a city-wide strategic decision-making body can facilitate a holistic strategic approach. Leadership and partnership management were considered crucial to effective branding and partnership working. Implications A strategic brand programme can be facilitated by the creation of a virtual organisation led by an elected mayor or LSP to mobilise the activity within a city network towards the common goal of a strategic brand programme. Positioning the programme close to a central decision-making body can help a brand programme to work holistically. Strong, effective leadership needs to be in place, and in the case of the LSP the local authority should not dominate the partnership. Elements and segmentation Deconstructing the Birmingham brand into its tangible and intangible brand elements revealed an expansive and complex product. Segmentation of a city into its brand elements can assist the Further enquiry made into the impact of conicting methods and characteristics of key players in a partnership (eg politicians, government ofcers and private sector CEOs) has revealed the importance of partnership management to strategic competence. Clarity of purpose and clear, balanced rules and methods were deemed critical to managing potential conict. Weak ofcers and a weak scrutiny function can undermine the success of a partnership (Ormston, 2004). One respondent expressed the need for interpreters when key players with potentially diverging motivations (for example in a partnership with key players from the private and public sectors) interface. This suggests that there is a method to managing partnerships that may be as important as leadership in mobilising the partners to achieve common goals. CONCLUSIONS Interest in branding cities is growing, as is the expectation that strong city brands will increase opportunities for tourism and investment and sell cities as great places in which to run businesses, study and live. In addressing the question of whether or not goods and services branding models can be used to brand cities, generic brand models and tourism segmentation models guided an investigation into the Birmingham brand. Four themes (the impact of a network on brand models developed for organisations; segmentation of brand elements; corporate branding; and the political dimension) emerged that were used as a framework for analysing the city brand. Complexity was common to all four themes. The lack of clear organisational boundaries and a strategic centre, and the implementation of brand strategy through a network were found to be unique to city brands and an 260 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders decide if, when and how they will use the corporate brand. The Birmingham brand aims to increase awareness and improve perceptions. It is intended for the brand to be adopted by a wide range of city organisations. There is a belief that a single brand image can abridge multiple identities. If this is not achieved, and a corporate brand approach is used, then choices may be made that exclude segments of a citys stakeholders. Implications Corporate brands need to be designed to accommodate a wide range of brand structures to facilitate adoption. Deployment of a corporate brand across a network is difcult. The challenge for practitioners is in inuencing and persuading organisations to adopt the brand. A single corporate brand must be carefully considered for diverse cities. Representation of diversity must not undermine the key function of corporate brand design, which is to maximise brand awareness. Role of local government (political dimension) The role of local government is extensive in city branding. Urban development and urban regeneration are key drivers of product improvement and keeping a city brand relevant in the UK. Public policy impacts on a wide range of brand elements, from arts and culture to education to safe streets, all of which are potential sources of brand equity. Strategic brand programmes require support in the long term. There is potential for the political dimension to undermine long-term support. Conicting methods and characteristics of key players in a management of resources and activity. Segmentation also aids identication of sources of brand equity, which in turn should inform strategic decision-making groups. A city brand can also be segmented into perceptual categories of the non-ordinary world of the tourist and the ordinary world of the resident. Co-existing in a single location and experiencing many of the same brand elements, these two target markets will be inuenced by opposing sets of priorities when making decisions about a city. The brand promise for these two groups will also be dialectically opposed. Implications Decisions about brand elements need to consider the current strength of the element, its potential strength and whether or not improvement is achievable and desirable. If some elements are weak, difcult or impossible to improve, other elements can be developed to compensate; a weak history and climate can be compensated for by strong cultural products to attract urban tourism. Decisions around tourism need to consider the promise of the non-ordinary world. The ordinary and non-ordinary worlds might not always be in harmony. Brand programmes need to be balanced and potential conict managed proactively. Corporate brand The corporate brand/sub-brand relationship is different for a city brand than for a product or service brand. Decisions about the deployment of a corporate brand across a city brand portfolio are not made by the strategic decision makers or city brand practitioners. The sub-brands, or rather the organisations adopting the brand, will Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 261 City branding School of Public Policy, Birmingham, UK. Balmer, J. (2001) Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing Seeing through the fog, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35, Nos 3/4, pp. 248291. Balmer, J. (2003) Corporate brands: What are they? What of them?, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37, Nos 7/8, pp, 972997. BBC (1999) More elected mayors on the way, BBC News, 26th November, available from <news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/537686.stm>. BBC (2003) No challenge to runway plan, BBC News, 16th December, available from <news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/ 3323273.stm>. Bennett, R. and Koudelova, R. (2001) Image selection and the marketing of downtown areas in London and New York, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 205220. Birmingham City Council (2003a) Birmingham economy, available from <www.birminghameconomy.org.uk>. Birmingham City Council (2003b) Birmingham Residents Views 2002, Research Study Conducted for Birmingham City Council, MORI, Birmingham, UK. Birmingham City Council (2004) Personal communication, 12th February. Birmingham Post (2003) Commerce must lead campaign, Birmingham Post, 1st August, available from <icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/ 0150business/0200news/ page.cfm?objectid =13242649&method=full&siteid=50002>. Burson-Marsteller, Landor Associates and Wirthlin Worldwide for the Government of Hong Kong (2001) Perceptions of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Brand Management Ofce, Hong Kong. Calpin, D. (2000) Community strategies key to future of local government, The Guardian, 8th December. Carley, M., Campbell, M., Kearns, A., Wood, M. and Young, R. (eds) (2000) Regeneration in the 21st Century: Policies into Practice: An Overview of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Area Regeneration Programme, Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Bristol, UK. Casteldine, P. (2003) Branding Birmingham, Birmingham Vision, Vol. 1, Summer, pp. 57. Castells, M. (2000) The contours of the network society, Foresight, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 151157. City Strategic Partnership (2003) Personal communication, 23rd January. Cohen, J. and Basu, K. (1987) Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, March, pp. 455472. Dale, P. (2003) Half culture team boycott inquiry, Birmingham Post, 11th December, available from <icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/ 0100localnews/ page.cfm?objectid= 13713939&method=full&siteid=50002>. partnership can undermine strategic competence. Implications Policy makers can support strategic brand programmes by developing policies that underpin the brand programme in the long term. A holistic strategic approach to branding and positioning the brand programme close to the central decision-making body will facilitate appropriate policy decisions. Local authorities can facilitate partnerships and develop leaders from within the community. Partnerships and potential conict of key players must be managed proactively. What one needs to know There remains much polemic and promotion, but little evidence on the effectiveness of city branding. Many questions remain unanswered. Is a single brand identity for a city desirable or achievable? Are cities too complex? Can insight into managing multiple identities be found in research on diversity issues that global brands face? There is a need for further research across a wide range of cities. For example, comparative studies of strong and weak city brands within a national context need to be carried out before generalisations about city brands can be made. The subject of strategic city branding is vast and complex. In particular, this research has only skimmed the surface of the role of local government and the political dimension. References Aaker, D. (1996) Building Strong Brands, Free Press/Simon & Schuster, New York, NY. Aulakh, S., Churchill, S. and Spencer, K. (2002) A Case-Study Analysis of the Birmingham City Pride Partnership, University of Birmingham 262 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Koolhaas, R. (1994) Delirious New York, Monticelli Press, New York, UK. Koolhaas, R. (2001) Projects for Prada, Part 1, Fondazione Prada, Milan, Italy. Kotler, P., Haider, D. H. and Rein, I. R. (1993) Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry and Tourism to Cities, States and Nations, Free Press/Macmillan, New York, NY. Laforet, S. and Saunders, J. (1994) Managing brand portfolios: How the leaders do it, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 6475. Laforet, S. and Saunders, J. (1999) Managing brand portfolios: Why leaders do what they do, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 5166. Lefton, T. (2003) Made in New York, Brandweek, Vol. 44, No. 45, p. 28. Lennon, J. and Seaton, A. V. (1998) Pathways to success: Contrasting roles in public sector business development for the tourism industries A comparison of Glasgow and Dublin, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 11, Nos 2/3, pp. 139153. Locate in Birmingham (2003a) Birmingham City Council, available from <www.locatebirmingham.org.uk>. Locate in Birmingham (2003b) Personal communication, 27th November. Marketing Birmingham (2003a) Birmingham Image/Perceptions Research, Marketing Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Marketing Birmingham (2003b) Tourism Monitor, Marketing Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Marketing Birmingham (2003c) Birmingham Brand Guidelines, Marketing Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Marketing Birmingham (2003d) Personal communication, 13th August. Matson, E. W. (1994) Can cities market themselves like Coke and Pepsi do?, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 3541. Murphy, J. M. (1992) Branding, A Key Marketing Tool, 2nd edn, Macmillan Academic and Professional, Basingstoke, UK. Murthy, K. R. S. (1987) Do public enterprises need a corporate strategy?, Vikalpa, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1222. Olins, W. (2003a) Hull: Pioneering city, Wolff Olins. Case Study, available from <www.wolff-olins.com/les/Hull_0202 New815000.pdf>, pp. 16. Olins, W. (2003b) On Brand, Thames & Hudson, London, UK. Ormston, A. (2004) Personal communication, 5th February. Parker, S. (2003) Chains of ofce, The Guardian, 12th March, available from <society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/ 0,,911922,00.html>. Porter, M. E. (1990) The competitive advantage of Dale, P. (2004) Marketing group faces nance probe, Birmingham Post, 6th January, available from <icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/ 0100news/0100localnews/ page.cfm?objectid =13784895&method=full&siteid=50002>. De Chernatony, L. (1992) Categorising brands: Evolutionary processes underpinned by two key dimensions, Working Paper Series, City University Business School, London, UK. De Chernatony, L. (2002) Would a brand smell any sweeter by a corporate name?, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 5, Nos 2/3, pp. 114132. De Chernatony, L. and McDonald, M. (2001) Creating Powerful Brands in Consumer, Service and Industrial Markets, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK. De Chernatony, L. and Riley, F. D. (1998) Modeling the components of the brand, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32, Nos 11/12, pp. 10741090. De Chernatony, L. and Segal-Horn, S. (2003) The criteria for successful services brands, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37, Nos 7/8, pp. 10951118. Doyle, P. (1989) Building successful brands: The strategic options, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7677. Feldwick, P. (1991) Dening a brand, in Cowley, D. (ed.) Understanding Brands, Kogan Page, London, UK, pp. 1730. Florian, B. (2002) The city as a brand, in City Branding, NIA Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 2031. Greenbaum, R. and Bondonio, D. (2003) Comparative evaluation of spacially targeted economic revitalization programmes in the European Union and the United States, Working Paper 3, International Centre for Economic Research, Torino, Italy. Interact-Network (2003) City of Birmingham, available from <www.interact-network.org/ cities/download/cityofbir.pdf>. Jafari, J. (1982) Tourism market basket of goods and services: Components and nature of tourism, in Singh, T. V., Kapur, J. and Singh, D. P. (eds) Studies in Tourism Wildlife Park Conservation, Metropolitan Book Company, New Delhi, India, pp. 112. Jafari, J. (1987) Tourism models: The sociocultural aspects, Tourism Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 151159. Jafari, J. (1995) Structure of tourism: Three integrated models, in Witt, F. S. and Moutinho, L. (eds) Tourism Marketing and Management Handbook, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK, pp. 517. Keller, K. L. (2000) The Brand Report Card, Harvard Business Review, JanuaryFebruary, pp. 310. Keller, K. L. (2001) Building consumer-based brand equity, Marketing Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 1419. Keller, K. L. (2003) Strategic Brand Management: Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Place Branding 263 City branding 13112614&method=full&siteid=50002>. Young, R. (2000) Partnerships Realising the potential, in Carley, M., Campbell, M., Kearns, A., Wood, M. and Young, R. (eds) Regeneration in the 21st Century: Policies into Practice: An Overview of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Area Regeneration Programme, Policy Press, Bristol, UK. nations, Harvard Business Review, MarchApril, pp. 7393. Porter, M. E. (2001) Strategy and the internet, Harvard Business Review, MarchApril, pp. 150. Swingler, S. (2003) Tourists reject Midland sites, Evening Mail, 26th June, available from <icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/ 0100localnews/page.cfm?objectid= 264 Place Branding Vol. 1, 3, 242264 Henry Stewart Publications 1744070X (2005) Parkerson and Saunders