SAMBRIDH GHIMIRE [2012] B.A., LLB. (HONS.) DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5th May 2014
National Law School of India University 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .............................................................. 3 Research Methodology ................................................. 4 AN OVERVIEW ....................................................... 5 Legal Position in India .............................................. 6 Poverty and homelessness ......................................... 6 Policy of the government .......................................... 8 Role of Private Parties ............................................. 9
Housing can said to be the core around which the life of an individual revolves. It is a basic necessity for an individual. It can be said to be a condition in which people are denied regular access to housing for numerous reasons ranging from poverty to illness to social exclusion. The primary reason for people becoming homeless is due to the economic unviability of affordable housing for low income groups of people. Here the role of poverty comes into play. As the income of the individual declines, more likely s/he is to be homeless, as loss in income would restrict the individual to pay for the maintenance of his home. Having laid down the context, the researcher in this paper aims to discuss homelessness and poverty, the measures undertaken to rehabilitate the urban poor. In the course of the paper, the researcher proposes to discuss the state of homelessness in India, the constitutional safeguards to right to shelter, correlation between poverty and homelessness. Further the researcher aims to discuss the role of the government focusing on the Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) extensively, a flagship programme of the United Progressive Alliance, which envisages a slum free India. Further the role of private parties has been emphasised upon by a case study on the construction labour contractors. Though there are other schemes and policies operational in context, the researcher has limited his study only to the RAY and the case study of the construction labour contractors .Through the approach mentioned above, the researcher will make an attempt to understand the role of private parties in the rehabilitation of the homeless.
4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Aims and Objectives This paper focuses on examining the status of homeless in Bangalore. The roles of both government and non-government agencies have been examined with respect to the rehabilitation process. Scope and Limitation However, the several other aspects related to homelessness and poverty. The paper is limited to the scope of role of private parties and some policies of the government.
Style of Writing The researcher has used descriptive and analytical modes during the entire course of writing this paper.
Sources of Data The researcher has relied on secondary source like books. Mode of Citation A uniform mode of citation has been followed by the researcher.
5
AN OVERVIEW
If statistical data were to be held reliable, an estimate of at least 26 percent of the entire urban population in India is below the established poverty line. 1 A quarter of the urban population categorized as poor is an alarming figure. More importantly, most of these people inhabit slum and squatter settlements which deprive them of their basic civic amenities like access to proper sanitation facilities, waste management et cetera and consequently these are the conditions which breed crime and lawlessness which trap them into a situation of chronic poverty. Such a situation can be attributed to iniquitous and exclusionary urban planning system, urban land management schemes and land legislation that have not adapted to the pace of urban growth. 2
With the growth of the cities increasing year by year, the slum dwellings can only be expected to grow more. In India homeless people are defined those who do not have access to or are not living in census housing. 3 A census house here refers to a structure with roof. Consequently, while collecting data on the homeless people officials are suggested to keep in mind the places where it might be possible for the homeless population to live, these would include temples, railway platforms, roadside pavements et cetera. Further, homeless people also include the people sleeping without shelter, in constructions not meant for habitation or in other welfare institutions. 4
The right to housing is a complex right, which merely does not envisage the right to shelter but also includes security and proper living conditions. In other words right to housing would not be satisfied by just a sheer roof over ones head, moreover, it would require a structure with
1 David Satterthwaite, Upgrading Slums: With and For Slum-Dwellers, 45(10) ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY 12, 12 (March 6, 2010). 2 Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation, RAJIV AWAS YOJANA : GUIDELINES FOR SLUM-FREE CITY PLANNING, 1 (2013). 3 Census of India 2011,MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,availible at http://censusindia.gov.in/2011- Documents/Houselisting%20English.pdf (Last visited on May 5,2014). 4 United Nations Demographic Yearbook Review, UNITED NATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS STATISTICS DIVISION, DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL STATISTICS BRANCH ,(14 April 2004),available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/techreport/hhchar.pdf (Last visisted on May 2,2014). 6
habitable space which would be sufficient to cater the basic human needs, providing with personal space with basic amenities, adequate ventilation and lighting, safe and sound infrastructure protective of the weather conditions, etc. all of these at a reasonable cost.
LEGAL POSITION IN INDIA
In the Indian Constitution, the right has not been explicitly mentioned but is an interpretation to the rights under Article 21.The interpretation here however have not been consistent. Due to which the right has not been enforceable in certain aspects. In cases related to housing for the poor, the courts have rejected the claim of recognition of this right.Thus,in such a scenario where the existence of the right is challenged, the question of the right being guaranteed broadly would be a distant dream. 5
This can be further accentuated from the case of Olga Tellis 6 ,wherein the petitioners contended that eviction from slums and pavements would deprive them of their livelihood. The Courts in this case emphasised that no one has the right to use public property for private purpose, without authorization, irrespective of the circumstances. But ,in the case of Chameli Singh the court held that right to shelter is not merely having a roof above ones head, but encompasses the entire infrastructural facility to enable them to live and develop their lives as humans. 7 This comes as a deviation from the past judgements of the courts, and ensures right to shelter widely. POVERTY AND HOMELESSNESS
Poverty can be attributed as the main cause for contributing towards homelessness in India. Poverty can be defined as a state in which there is a constant exhibition of human deprivation due to non-fulfilment of basic needs like food, shelter, clothing et cetera. The dimensions for the same are ever changing and homelessness is one exhibition of this dimension.
5 Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. AIR 1996 SC 1051. 6 Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation 1985 3 SCC 545 7 Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. AIR 1996 SC 1051. 7
In the view of the researcher, there are two primary ways in which poverty can be seen in influencing or causing homelessness. Firstly, in cases of rampant poverty, people are compelled to sell their property, which was their shelter to survive. Secondly, as the income level of the individual is low, it further maintains and extends the existing problem of homelessness. In the fieldwork conducted by the researcher, it was found that poverty was the main cause of people being homeless, though there were other causes such as lack of affordable housing, lack of employment opportunities, natural disasters etc. In the course of the fieldwork the researcher observed that the homeless were deeply dissatisfied towards the rehabilitations programmes of the government. Shanta Mary, resident of Ejipura, who was rendered homeless after the demolition of the EWS quarters. Since, then she and her children have been living on the pavement as their temporary shelters were demolished too. In this case the EWS were allotted flats at Ejipura which were substandard. They had no basic amenities. In a short span of time the buildings started collapsing due to low quality of construction and substandard goods. 8 Ever since people like Shanta Mary have been homeless. 9
In cases of crises, it can be seen that the poor are more vulnerable than the rich. The poor may face many crises such as natural disasters, health problems etc. It might be logical here to deduce that these crises situations as discussed above puts burden on the scanty income or savings of the poor, which results in them being pushed down in their overall poverty level. Moreover, the loss of savings to resolve the crises, further erode a large proportion of their total income. This complemented by the chances of receiving the least amount of loan in comparison to the others, compel them to either sell or mortgage their meagre already existing assets, giving continuity to the vicious cycle of poverty and homelessness. Thus, the loss of a home, in the absence of credit availability or savings to fall back on, exposes the poor to conditions of extreme depredation. The number of people who lose their lives in the winters (referred to as cold waves, even though many deaths happen in years with more than average temperature, possibly because that phrase connotes unexpectedness and thus lowers moral responsibility) is a symptom of this homelessness that is particularly hard on the marginalised.
8 Interview with Shanta Mary,Homeless (Ejipura Kormangala Bangalore May 5th,2014) 9 Slum dwellers assert their rights, THE HINDU , (December 11, 2013),available at http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/slum-dwellers-assert-their-rights/article5444895.ece (Last visited on April 8, 2014). 8
In the case of Guru Prasad, a worker from West Bengal, was forced to sell of his house in Chanpadanga,West Bengal. After which he came to Bangalore with a labour contractor, but due to low wages, he cannot afford to rent a room for himself. In this case the contractor provides for a temporary accommodation, near the site, that is in case there is space available. The accommodation here is merely a roof. No other basic amenities are looked after. Rain results in the temporary structures being flooded with water. The (possibly illegal) electricity connection the workers acquired had not been working for 3 days when this researcher spoke with Guru. Further the structure is not physically sound and is prone to hazards in bad weather conditions. 10
POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT
The attitude of the government towards the problems which are being faced by the homeless is unpredictable. On one hand there are bringing out new policies like Rajiv Awas Yojana,Indira Awas Yojana, Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission to address the problems of housing and homelessness. In which the researcher would like to shed some light on Rajiv Awas Yojana. The Government of India in 2013 launched a holistic and ambitious mission by the name of Rajiv Awas Yojana (hereinafter RAY) which projects the vision of a slum free India. The government proposes to realise this goal by assigning property rights to the urban poor over their dwelling space. As most of the slum dwellers have migrated from rural parts of the State or Country, such a move by the government would be a gesture of formal recognition of the acceptance of these dwellers into the urban mainstream. The RAY mainly proceeds on this groundwork which would eventually result in better facilities being available to the occupants. It would approximately benefit about 81 million urban poor wherein the urban poor will get affordable housing, a healthy and clean environment with all the civic amenities being made readily available to them. 11 But on the other hand the government itself is responsible for making people homeless, the Ejipura forced eviction can be an example of government being responsible
10 Interview with Mr. Guru Prasad,Construction worker (Nagarbhavi Bangalore May 1st,2014) 11 Amitabh Kundu, Making Indian Cities Slum-Free: Vision and Operationalisation, 48(17) ECONOMIC & POLITICAL WEEKLY 15, 15 (April 27,2013). 9
for the homeless state of people. 12 Moreover, in the past it has been seen that regularising dwelling houses in the city does not really result in the provision of a decent house for slum- dwellers, as it makes more sense for them to sell or rent these out and continue to occupy an illegal space.
ROLE OF PRIVATE PARTIES
The focus now is towards the role of private parties in providing shelter to the homeless. The private parties have been in partnership with the government in various welfare measures. The welfare measure being discussed below is a peculiar one, which is being practiced in some states of North India. As per the interview conducted by the researcher with Satish Kumar, a construction worker from Patna, Bihar, the labour contractors provide their labourers with shelter, though the shelter may not be adequate form of housing, it serves the purpose of having a roof above oneself. In this arrangement construction workers are transported from one place to another around the country. This depends on where their contractor gets his tender fixed. During the time of the construction the workers are given a place to stay either within the premises of the construction site or somewhere near it, depending on the availability. The cost of temporary shelter is borne by the contractor. But as mentioned earlier these shelters are not structurally sound and provide no protection from bad weather conditions. Further, there is no adequate supply of necessities like electricity, water et cetera. Nevertheless, during the span of construction the workers are accommodated, by the contractors. Therefore it can be inferred that the workers have access to shelter as long as they are working for the contractor. In the view of the researcher this arrangement is more advantageous to the workers than giving them extra salary. This arrangement on one hand provides for the employment of the individual, which insures the
12 C P John, Address Home Truths About Homelessness, ,THE INDIAN EXPRESS, (3rd November 2013),available at Http://Www.Newindianexpress.Com/Magazine/Voices/Address-Home-Truths-About- Homelessness/2013/11/03/Article1866671.Ece (Last Visited On April 6,2014).
10
individual of an earning opportunity and on the other hand provides shelter to the individual, without them having to struggle to find accommodation, possibly in a place far from the construction site. 13 This ensures that transport costs are minimised, and from a regulatory point of view, such an arrangement allows the imposition of certain minimum conditions by the government or other interested parties (for instance the institution where construction is happening) on the kind of accommodation provided. Despite providing shelter, the contractors give sufficient wages to their workers as per the market rate of wages. This ensures that the labourers are not inadequately paid for their work. But it is also essential to acknowledge that migrant workers like Satish, whose family is in villages back some, have to put up with temporary and poor housing for the duration of their work. For them, the days of labour are an investment and the usually poor standards of housing a necessary trade-off. Thus, in the long term, the government should work to ensure that the inequalities between regions of the country are not so harsh that workers are forced to make trade-offs like poor housing that can be very detrimental to them.
13 Interview with Satish Kumar, Construction worker (Nagarbhavi Bangalore May 3 rd ,2014)
11
CONCLUSION
Thus it can be concluded that poverty and homelessness are correlated. The lower the income of the person more likely s/he would be homeless. As decline in income affects the spending capacity of a person, therefore as income declines, the possibility of paying mortgages and rents decline too, which results in the eviction of the person from his/her home, making the individual homeless. Another possible cause of homelessness is natural or artificial disasters, which particularly affect the poor more than any other group. Special measures need to be taken to ensure that the marginalised are protected in these situations of crisis. The judicial interpretation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution encompasses right to shelter, though the interpretations have not been consistent the recent trends have shown a more comprehensive approach towards right to shelter. The government has implemented numerous policies for the rehabilitation of the homeless. As discussed in the paper Rajiv Awas Yojana which is a project with a vision of slum free India. The policies of the government have their own limitations and implementation is difficult due to procedural flaws, lack of coordination and other administrative delays. On the other hand, it could be inferred from the eviction in Ejupura that the government is responsible for making the people homeless by forcefully evicting them from the property allotted to them. The role of private parties can be seen as a temporary one, as the fieldwork suggests the labourers are provided shelter during the period of construction. After which they are supposed to find their own shelter. Though some contractors provide shelter to labourers throughout the time of employment, this arrangement is a particularly rare one. 12
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Articles
1. A Shaw & M.K Satish, Metropolitan restructuring in post-liberalized India: Separating the global and the Local,24(2) CITIES, 148 (April 2007). 2. David Satterthwaite, Upgrading Slums: With and For Slum-Dwellers, 45(10) ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY (March 6, 2010). 3. C P John, Address Home Truths About Homelessness, ,THE INDIAN EXPRESS, (3 rd
November 2013), available at http://Www.Newindianexpress.Com/Magazine/Voices/Address-Home-Truths-About- Homelessness/2013/11/03/Article1866671.Ece (Last Visited On April 6,2014). 4. Amitabh Kundu, Making Indian Cities Slum-Free: Vision and Operationalisation, 48(17) ECONOMIC & POLITICAL WEEKLY 15, 15 (April 27,2013). 5. Slum Dwellers assert their rights,THE HINDU (11 December 2013), available at http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/slum-dwellers-assert-their- rights/article5444895.ece (Last visited on April 8, 2014). 6. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, FEATURES OF MODEL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO SLUM DWELLERS ACT, 2011 available at 13
http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=74625 (Last visited on April 17, 2014).
Interviews 1. Interview with Mr. Guru Prasad,Construction worker (Nagarbhavi Bangalore May 1 st ,2014) 2. Interview with Shanta Mary,Homeless (Ejipura Kormangala Bangalore May 5 th ,2014) 3. Interview with Satish Kumar, Construction worker (Nagarbhavi Bangalore May 3 rd ,2014)
Miscellaneous
1. Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation, RAJIV AWAS YOJANA : GUIDELINES FOR SLUM-FREE CITY PLANNING, (2013). 2. Census of India 2011, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, available at http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/Houselisting%20English.pdf (Last visited on May 5,2014). 3. United Nations Demographic Yearbook Review, UNITED NATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS STATISTICS DIVISION, DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL STATISTICS BRANCH, (14 April 2004), available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/techreport/hhchar.pdf (Last visited on May 2, 2014).