SWETA AMBASTA hereby declare that the project titled "SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICE : MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION" has been prepared by me and submitted under M.J.M.C Curriculum. Any resemblance from existing work is purely coincidental in nature.
SWETA AMBASTA hereby declare that the project titled "SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICE : MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION" has been prepared by me and submitted under M.J.M.C Curriculum. Any resemblance from existing work is purely coincidental in nature.
SWETA AMBASTA hereby declare that the project titled "SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICE : MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION" has been prepared by me and submitted under M.J.M.C Curriculum. Any resemblance from existing work is purely coincidental in nature.
An Autonomous Constituent Unit of Ranchi University
A Project Report on E-Tendering Portal
Submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree in Master of Computer Application
Under the guidance of Mr. Prakash Kumar
By NAME : - Rupa Singh ROLL NO :- 10MCRMS97030 CLASS : - M.C.A. SEMISTER : - VI SESSION : - 2010-13
MARWARI COLLEGE, RANCHI An Autonomous Constituent Unit Of Ranchi University
Department of Computer Science And Application
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project work entitled ONLINE POLLING is carried out by Bhanu Priya Yadav Reg No. 1097010, Roll No. 10MCRMS97010, session:2010-13 is bonafied student of Marwari College,Ranchi in partial fulfillment for the award of Master Of Computer Of Application in Submission Of Report, Marwari College,Ranchi.
Name & Signature of the Guide Name& Signature of the HOD Mr.PrakasKumar Mr. Avinash Kumar
DECLARATI ON I SWETA AMBASTA hereby declare that the project titled SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICE : MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION has been prepared by me and submitted under M.J.M.C Curriculum. All the information, facts and figures are collected by me and are first had in nature. Any resemblance from existing work is purely coincidental in nature.
Name of Candidate: SWETA AMBASTA Class Roll No. : 46 Exam Roll No. - 12MJ011 Session : 2011-2013
SIGNATURE OF THE CANDIDATE SWETA AMBASTA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am greatly indebted to my teacher of the Ranchi University Ranchi who introduces me to the studies mass communication. I wish to take this opportunity to express dip sense gratitude to them for in valuable guidance during the course of present investigation. I am thankful to non teaching staff of Ranchi University Ranchi Last but not list wish to express my gratitude to my family and specially to my friend for their help without which it would not have been to possible to complete this project work.
SIGNATURE OF THE CANDIDATE SWETA AMBASTA
INDEX No. Content Page No 1 INTRODUCTION
THE STUDY BRIEF RELEVANCE OF THE TOPIC AND THE ORGANIZATION MATERIALS AND METHODS OBJECTIVE
2-8
2 ORGANIZATION PROFILE NATURE OF WORKING JURISDICTION ORGANISATION STURCTURE CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL H R STRENGTH
9-52 3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ABOUT THE TOPIC
53-57 4 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE TOPIC IN THE ORGANIZATION
58-63 5 FINDING AND SUGGESTION 64 6 Bibliography 65
INTRODUCTION
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is an Indian law that aims to guarantee the 'right to work' and ensure livelihood security in khunti by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. The statute is hailed by the government as "the largest and most ambitious social security and public works programmed in the world". The more comprehensive survey of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, a Supreme Audit Institution defined in Article 148 of the Constitution of India, reports serious lapses in implementation of the act.
THE STUDY BRIEF RELEVANCE OF THE TOPIC AND THE ORGANIZATION
Targeting poverty through employment generation using rural works has had a long history in India that began in the 1960s. After the first three decades of experimentation, the government launched major schemes like Jawahar Rozgar Yojana, Employment Assurance Scheme, Food for Work Programme, Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana and Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana that were forerunners to Mahatma Gandhi NREGA. The theme of government approach had been to merge old schemes to introduce new ones while retaining the basic objective of providing additional wage employment involving unskilled manual work and also to create durable assets. The major responsibility of implementation was also gradually transferred to the Panchayati Raj Institutions. Unlike its precursors, the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA guaranteed employment as a legal right. However, the problem areas are still the same as they were in the 1960s. The most significant ones are: lack of public awareness, mismanagement and above all mass corruption. The statement of the law provides adequate safeguards to promote its effective management and implementation. The act explicitly mentions the principles and agencies for implementation, list of allowed works, financing pattern, monitoring and evaluation, and most importantly the detailed measures to ensure transparency and accountability. Further the provisions of the law adhere to the principles enunciated in the Constitution of India. The comprehensive assessment of the performance of the law by the constitutional auditor revealed serious lapses arising mainly due to lack of public awareness, mismanagement and institutional incapacity. The CAG also suggests a list of recommendations to the government for corrective measures. The government, however, had also released a collection of reportedly independent researches evaluating the functioning of the act whose results significantly differed from the CAG report. Meanwhile, the social audits in two Indian states highlight the potential of the law if implemented effectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Prior to the enactment of Mahatma Gandhi NREGA, India had no programme in khunti that promised employment as a legal right, although employment generation through rural works had a long history in India dating back to the 1960s. Since 1960, [n 1] the government had been merging old schemes to introduce new ones while retaining the basic objective of providing additional wage employment involving unskilled manual work, creating durable assets, and improving food security in khunti through public works with special safeguards for the weaker sections and women of the community. The problem areas had also been almost similar like mismanagement, lack of planning and implementation. The remuneration had been a combination of wages and foodgrains across all schemes. It took 30 years of government experimentation to launch major schemes like Jawahar Rozgar Yojana (JRY), Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), Food for Work Programme (FWP), Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana (JGSY) and Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (SGRY) that were forerunners to Mahatma Gandhi NREGA. In the process, the government decentralized implementation by providing financial and functional autonomy to the local self- government institutions or Panchayati Raj Institutions(PRIs) in order to fight corruption.
OBJECTIVES The main objective of the Act is to enhance livelihood security in khunti by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work.
ORGANIZATION PROFILE:-
Sonia Gandhi, the chairperson of the then ruling coalition United Progressive Alliance (UPA) is believed to be instrumental in making the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA into law. The government experimented with various schemes from 1960-90. The most significant ones were Food for Work Programme (FWP) of 1977 and National Rural Employment Programme (NREP) of 1980. The popular FWP provided food grains to complement wages. It was then revamped and renamed to NREP with almost similar objective. On 1 April 1989, to converge employment generation, infrastructure development and food security in khunti, the government integrated NREP and RLEGP into a new scheme JRY. The most significant change was the decentralization of implementation by involving local people through PRIs and hence a decreasing role of bureaucracy. Due to implementation issues, JRY was restructured and renamed to JGSY in 1999. On 2 October 1993, the EAS was initiated to provide employment during the lean agricultural season. The role of PRIs was reinforced with the local self-government at the district level called the Zilla Parishad as the main implementing authority. Again due to implementation issues, EAS was merged with SGRY in 2001. In January 2001, the government again introduced FWP similar to the one initiated in 1977. Once again due to implementation issues, it was merged with Mahatma Gandhi NREGA in 2006. On 1 April 1999, the JRY was revamped and renamed to JGSY with a similar objective. The role of PRIs was further reinforced with the local self-government at the village level called the Village Panchayats as the sole implementing authority. But again due to implementation issues, it was merged with SGRY in 2001. Once again on 25 September 2001 to converge employment generation, infrastructure development and food security in khunti, the government integrated EAS and JGSY into a new scheme SGRY. The role of PRIs was retained with the Village Panchayats as the sole implementing authority. Yet again due to implementation issues, it was merged with Mahatma Gandhi NREGA in 2006. In 2005, and again to converge employment generation, infrastructure development and food security in khunti, the government integrated SGRY and FWP into a new scheme called Mahatma Gandhi NREGA. The total government allocation to these precursors of Mahatma Gandhi NREGA had been about three-quarters of 1 trillion (equivalent to over $18 billion).
NATURE OF WORKING
According to the Eleventh Five Year Plan (200712), the number of Indians living on less than 1 a day, called Below Poverty Line (BPL), was 300 million that barely declined over the last three decades ranging from 1973 to 2004, although their proportion in the total population decreased from 36 per cent (199394) to 28 percent (200405), and the rural working class dependent on agriculture was unemployed for nearly 3 months per year which was rising due to a downward trend of the agricultural productivity and in turn also aggravating poverty. In large states like Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh,JHARKHAND, specially in khunti district the number of poor even increased. The plan targeted poverty through MGNREGA which promised employment as an entitlement. The law is based on Gandhian principles. Previous employment guarantee schemes (EGS) like Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (SGRY) or Universal Rural Employment Programme andNational Food For Work Programme (NFFWP) - both SGRY and NFFWP were merged with MGNREGA - also provided short- term unskilled employment to poor, assured food and job security and created durable assets. In contrast to the earlier wage employment programmes, MGNREGA, as per its definition, is a right-based, demand-driven public employment programme that is principally based on decentralized, participatory planning at the gram panchayat level with adequate transparency and accountability safeguards for effective implementation.
The MGNREGA is notified on 7 September 2005 with the objective of "enhancing livelihood security in khunti by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year, to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work". In addition to this the aim of
MGNREGA in khunti created durable assets that would augment the basic resources available to the poor. At minimum wage rate and within 5 km radius of the village, the employment under MGNREGA is an entitlement that creates an obligation on the government failing which an unemployment allowance is to be paid within 15 days. Along with community participation, the MGNREGA is to be implemented mainly by the gram panchayats (GPs) of khunti jharkhand. The involvement of contractors is banned. Labour-intensive tasks like creating infrastructure for water harvesting, drought relief and flood control are preferred. Starting from 200 districts in 2 February 2006, the MGNREGA covered all the districts of India from 1 April 2008.
The stated objective of the Act is to enhance livelihood security in khunti by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. This work guarantee can also serve other objectives: generating productive assets, protecting the environment, empowering rural women, reducing rural-urban migration and fostering social equity, among others." For effective management, the legislation also mentions implementation principles and key agencies.The principles are: collaborative partnership and public accountability; community participation; panchayats as principal authorities; overall responsibility of district programme coordinator (DPC) and programme officer (PO); coordination among agencies; and resource support. The agencies are: Gram Sabha and Gram Panchayat at the village level; intermediate panchayat and PO at the block level; district panchayats and DPC at the district level; state employment guarantee council (SEGC), state government and employment guarantee commissioner at the state level; and central employment guarantee council (CEGC) and Ministry of Rural Development at the central level. The Act further mandates its wide publicity. The statute further mandates planning through preparation of the District Perspective Plan and the Annual Plan. Likewise the stated registration process involves an application to the Gram Panchayat and issue of job cards. The wage employment must be provided within 15 days of the date of application. The work entitlement of 100 days per household per year may be shared between different adult members of the same household. The law too lists the permissible works: water conservation and water harvesting; drought proofing including afforestation; irrigation works; restoration of traditional water bodies; land development; flood control; rural connectivity; and works notified by the government. The Act sets a minimum limit to the works executed by the Gram Panchayat as 50 per cent and to the wage-material ratio as 60:40. The provision of accredited engineers, worksite facilities and a weekly report on worksites is also mandated by the Act.
The law is named after Mahatma Gandhi. Furthermore the Act sets a minimum limit to the wages, to be paid with gender equality, either on a time-rate basis or on a piece- rate basis. The states are required to evolve a set of norms for the measurement of works and schedule of rates. The unemployment must be paid if the work is not provided within the statutory limit of 15 days. Moreover, the legislation details the financing pattern between the central and the state government and the establishment of the Employment Guarantee Funds at both levels. Unlike the SGRY and NFFWP, the financing to the states is based on proposals and is not predetermined. The law stipulates Gram Panchayats to have a single bank account for NREGA works which shall be subjected to public scrutiny. To promote transparency and accountability, the act mandates monthly squaring of accounts. The statute further imposes monitoring across all five levels: the village level, the block level, the district level, the state level, and the central level. Further the monitoring methods and the evaluation criteria are also detailed in the act using which an annual ranking of districts may be drawn. For evaluation of outcomes, the law also requires management of data and maintenance of records, like registers related to employment, job cards, assets, muster rolls and complaints, by the implementing agencies at the village, block and state level. The most detailed part of the Act (chapter 10 and 11) deals with transparency and accountability that lays out role of the state, the public vigilance and, above all, the social audits. The legislation specifies the role of the state in ensuring transparency and accountability through upholding the right to information and disclosing information proactively, preparation of annual reports by CEGC for Parliament and SEGCs for state legislatures, undertaking mandatory financial audit by each district along with physical audit, taking action on audit reports, developing a Citizen's Charter, establishing vigilance and monitoring committees, and developing grievance redressal system. To ensure public accountability through public vigilance, the NREGA designates social audits as key to its implementation. The continuous process of social audit on NREGA in khunti jharkhand works involves public vigilance and verification at the stipulated 11 stages of implementation: registration of families; distribution of job cards; receipt of work applications; selection of suitable public works; preparation of technical estimates; work allocation; implementation and supervision; payment of wages; payment of unemployment allowance; evaluation of outcomes; and mandatory social audit in the Gram Sabha or Social Audit Forum. The Gram Panchayat of khunti jharkhand Secretary called Sarpanch is designated as the authority responsible for carrying out the social audit at all stages. For some stages, the programme officer and the junior engineer is also responsible along with Sarpanch. The statute designates the Gram Sabha of khunti Jharkhand meetings held to conduct social audit as the Social Audit Forums and spells out three steps to make them effective: publicity and preparation of documents; organizational and procedural aspects; and the mandatory agenda involving questions verifying compliance with norms specified at each of the 11 stages of implementation. The Act recommends establishment of Technical Resource Support Groups at district, state and central level and active use ofI nformation Technology, like creation of a Monitoring and Information System (MIS) and a NREGA website, to assure quality in implementation of NREGA through technical support. The law allows convergence of NREGA with other programmes. As NREGA intends to create additional employment, the convergence should not affect employment provided by other programmes.
JURISDICTION
The Act aims to follow the Directive Principles of State Policy enunciated in Part IV of the Constitution of India. The law guarantees the 'right to work' which is consistent with Article 41 that directs the State to secure to all citizens the right to work. Further conforming to the Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that defines the right to work as a basic human right, this law guarantees the right to work to the people of India and hence is termed as a "Peoples Act". The statute also seeks to protect the environment through rural works which is consistent with Article 48A that directs the State to protect the environment. In accordance with the Article 21 of the Constitution of India that guarantees the right to life with dignity to every citizen of India, this act imparts dignity to the rural people through an assurance of livelihood security. The Fundamental Right enshrined in Article 16 of the Constitution of India guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment and prevents the State from discriminating against anyone in matters of employment on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, place of residence or any of them. The statute mandates that at least one-third of the beneficiaries shall be women (Section 4.6.9 of the NREGA Operational Guidelines). [48] Moreover women
representation in the employment under the Act has been reported as 48 per cent from 200912, showing that the law has been used as an instrument to reduce gender inequality and foster women empowerment. Moreover the share of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been around 30 per cent, showing that the statute has empowered weaker sections ensuring social justice. In doing so, the legislation also follows Article 46 that requires the State to promote the interests of and work for the economic uplift of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and protect them from discrimination and exploitation. Khunti Jharkhand mandates to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government. Conferring the primary responsibility of implementation on Gram Panchayats, the Act adheres to this constitutional principle. Also the process of decentralization initiated by 73rd Amendment to the Constitution of India that granted a constitutional status to the Panchayats is further reinforced by the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA that endowed these rural self-government institutions with authority to implement the law. representation in the employment under the Act has been reported as 48 per cent from 200912, showing that the law has been used as an instrument to reduce gender inequality and foster women empowerment. Moreover the share of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been around 30 per cent, showing that the statute has empowered weaker sections ensuring social justice. In doing so, the legislation also follows Article 46 that requires the State to promote the interests of and work for the economic uplift of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and protect them from discrimination and exploitation. Article 40 mandates the State to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government. [51] Conferring the primary responsibility of implementation on Gram Panchayats, the Act adheres to this constitutional principle. Also the process of decentralization initiated by 73rd Amendment to the Constitution of India that granted a constitutional status to the Panchayats khunti is further reinforced by the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA that endowed these rural self-government institutions with authority to implement the law
3.CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ABOUT THE TOPIC
To improve livelihood security in khunti, NREGA aims to provide an assured job involving unskilled manual work for minimum 100 days per year. Starting from 200 districts in 2 February 2006, the NREGA covered all the districts of India from 1 April 2008. The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India on the second performance audit of NREGA, that covered 3,848 gram panchayats (GPs) in 28 states and 4 union territories (UTs) of India from April 2007 to March 2012, was "laid on the table of the Parliament house on April 23, 2013". The CAG is the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) defined in Article 148 of the Constitution of India. The CAG reports, mainly under Vinod Rai, are believed to have exposed few major scams like the coal scam and the 2G Spectrum scam allegedly costing the Indian exchequer close to a quarter of US$1 trillion in lost revenues that is roughly equivalent to China's total defence expenditure for three years (201113). Lack of public awareness, mismanagement, and institutional incapacity are the three most significant factors that are highlighted by the CAG report on the second performance audit of the NREGA. Although half of Indias poverty resides in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Maharashtra, the CAG reports that out of every 100 poor in India only 9 beneficiaries of the law belonged to these states. Hence due to lack of awareness, the CAG reports, the statute is not effective in reducing poverty, the aim with which it was conceived. Moreover a significant fall of 20 per cent in demand is also reported by the CAG audit. Notwithstanding the statutory requirement of notification, yet five states have not even notified the eight-years- old scheme. Though the public awareness in a demand driven scheme is crucial, still the Information, Education and Communication (IEC) plan is not drawn by half of the states and UTs.
Major recommendations of the CAG audit on MGNREGA The CAG reports that the mismanagement of NREGA works resulted in a declining trend in the number of works completed since the law was enacted, with only 1 out 4 works completed in 2012. This reportedly affects the realization of the primary objective of the Act which is to provide livelihood securityand to create durable assets. [49] Despite the approved 13 million tasks worth $25 billion, only 4 million tasks are completed and $18 billion is unutilised an efficiency of only 30 per cent in implementation. According to Section 5.4 of the NREGA Operational Guidelines, minimum wage component in the total outlay must be 60 per cent. The CAG reports that out of total sanctioned amount of $25 billion, only $7 billion was utilized. The CAG also reports that the material component exceeded the prescribed level by about $350 million. Hence the maximum expenditure on the payment of wages is only $3.85 billion out of total allocation of $25 billion. Thus only 15 per cent is spent to pay wages. Even though Section 16(3) of the NREGA mandates the drafting of Annual Development Plans (ADPs), yet only 70 per cent of gram panchayats (GPs) have complied. Mismanagement of tasks costing $1 billion is also reported in the audit. Other mismanagement issues like the scarcity of 'Gram Rozgar Sahayaks' (rural employment helpers), no jobcards, no photographs on job cards and payment irregularities are also found in the CAG audit. Moreover, in breach of financial accountability rules, the central government unconditionally released around $1.5 billion to the states. [64]
Even though the mass social audits have a statutory mandate of Section 17 (as outlined in Chapter 11 of the NREGA Operational Guidelines), yet only seven states have the institutional capacity to facilitate the social audits as per prescribed norms. Although the Central Council is mandated to establish a central evaluation and monitoring system as per the NREGA Operational Guidelines, even after six years it is yet to fulfill the NREGA directive. Further, the CAG audit reports discrepancies in the maintenance of prescribed basic records in up to half of the gram panchayats (GPs) which inhibits the critical evaluation of the NREGA outcomes. The unreliability of Management Information System (MIS), due to significant disparity between the data in the MIS and the actual official documents, is also reported. To address this lack of public awareness, mismanagement, and institutional incapacity, the CAG suggests a list of recommendations to the Ministry of Rural Development of the Government of India. To increase public awareness, the intensification of the Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities is recommended. To improve management of outcomes, the CAG recommends proper maintenance of records at the gram panchayat (GP) level. A need to revamp the NREGASoft (MIS) through incorporation of strict data integrity checks in software design is also suggested. Further the Central Council is recommended to establish a central evaluation and monitoring system for "a national level, comprehensive and independent evaluation of the scheme". The CAG also recommends a timely payment of unemployment allowance to the rural poor and a wage material ratio of 60:40 in the NREGA works. Moreover for effective financial management, the CAG recommends proper maintenance of
accounts, in a uniform format, on a monthly basis and also enforcing the statutory guidelines to ensure transparency in the disposal of funds. For capacity building, the CAG recommends an increase in staff hiring to fill the large number of vacancies.
4.ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE TOPIC IN THE ORGANITION
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh released an anthology of research studies on the MGNREGA called "MGNREGA Sameeksha" in New Delhi on July 14, 2012, about an year before the CAG report. Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey said that "the MGNREGA Sameeksha is a significant innovation to evaluate policy and delivery". The anthology reportedly draws on independent assessments of MGNREGA conducted by Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and others in collaboration with United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) published from 2008 to 2012. The Prime Minister said: The Mahatma Gandhi NREGA story in numbers is a story worth telling... the scheme scores high on inclusivness...no welfare scheme in recent memory has caught the imagination of the people as much as NREGA has ... under which 1,10,000 crore (about USD$25 billion) have been spent to pay wages to 1,200 crore (12 billion) people. Minister of Rural Development Jairam Ramesh says in the 'MGNREGA Sameeksha': It is perhaps the largest and most ambitious social security and public works programme in the world. ... soundness and high potential of the MGNREGA are well established ... . That, at any rate, is one of the main messages emerging from this extensive review of research on MGNREGA. It is also a message that comes loud and clear from the resounding popularity of MGNREGAtoday, about one-fourth of all rural households participate in the programme every year. Further the Minister says: MGNREGAs other quantitative achievements have been striking as well: 1. Since its inception in 2006, around 1,10,000 crore (about USD$25 billion) has gone directly as wage payment to rural households and 1200 crore (12 billion) person-days of employment has been generated. On an average, 5 crore (50 million) households have been provided employment every year since 2008. 2. Eighty per cent of households are being paid directly through bank/post office accounts, and 10 crore (100 million) new bank/post office accounts have been opened. The average wage per person-day has gone up by 81 per cent since the Schemes inception, with state-level variations. The notified wage today varies from a minimum
According to a recent Indian Government committee constituted to estimate poverty, nearly 38% of Indias population is poor. More than 75% of poor people reside in villages. Rural poverty is largely a result of low productivity and unemployment. In order to alleviate rural poverty by generating employment and creation of sustainable assets in Rural India, Government of India brought in the flagship programme called Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), 2005. However, Social security programmes are not free from flaws. So is the case with MGNREGA. This article highlights the issues and challenges being faced by Government while implementing the worlds largest employment generating programme and the issues among the people covered under the scheme. JHARHAND KHUNTI has got a great achievement in implementing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act in 2012-13 by providing 86.27 days of work on an average to a rural household, a state minister claimed here today. "When the national average is 39, the state could provide 86.27 days of work to the job card holders. Khunti secured first position in implementation of the Act," State Rural Development Minister Jitendra Chowdhury told reporters. MGNREGA authorises 100... : Most farmers in India are aware of MGNREGAscheme but not about the minimum support price (MSP) for crops fixed by the Centre to avoid distress sale, according to a study by research body CSDS. Also, 76 per cent of farmers surveyed prefer to do some other work rather than farming, while 60 per cent of them want their children to migrate to cities, the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) said in a survey that covered over 5,000 farmer households in 18 states.
The CSDS study, conducted on behalf of farmers body Bharat Krishak Samaj (BKS), said: "Approximately, 85 per cent of farmers have heard about MGNREGA. ...Approximately 62 per cent were not aware about the MSP." However, 51 per cent of those who knew about MGNREGA said that they did not get work under this scheme, while 64 per cent of farmers who were aware of MSP were not satisfied
with the price fixed by the government, it said. It was in 1966, the government first announced the MSP for wheat to safeguard the interest of farmers. Since then, the MSP regime has been expanded to 25 crops. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was enacted recently in 2005 with the objective of guaranteeing 100 days of work in khunti. The study also said that most farmers are unaware of agri-schemes such as Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY), National Food Security Mission, National Agricutlure Insurance Scheme, Gramin Beej Yojana, Kisan Credit Card and loan waiver scheme among others. "Being unware of these schemes, most farmers did not benefit from them.... Farmers did not benefit for lack of knowledge about the scheme," the study said and added that most farmers felt only rich farmers got benefit of government schemes and policies related to farming. The study also said that only 27 per cent of them have heard about the land acquisition law and most of them felt that they would stand to lose from this law. Also, 83 per cent of farmers have not heard about foreign direct investment (FDI). Among those who have heard of it, 51 per cent were against allowing FDI in agriculture. On farmer suicides, the study said about 15 per cent had heard about farmers killing themselves in their area. "41 per cent respondents report domestic problems as most important reason for suicide cases, 35 per cent because of credit/loan followed by 14 per cent because of crop failure." Contrary to general perception, the study said not many farmers are worried about repayment of loans. On status of farmers, the study said around 47 per cent of them felt that the overall condition in the country is bad. Most of them blamed both Centre and state governments for their problems. MGNREGA helped increase food-grain production in khunti.
Various schemes initiated under the MGNREGA programme here has led to a significant rise in food-grain production and improvement in ecology in coal mine areas in the district, a top official has said. There has been significant rise in food-grain production in the district which is regarded as the rice bowl of Bengal due to the initiatives taken under the schemes of the MGNREGA, Khunti The initiatives included conversion of mono-crop land into multi-crop one through increased irrigation potential, flood protection schemes, land development and soil treatment. This financial year, there has been a jump of 2 lakh tonne of rice in the district from 12 lakh to 14 lakh tonnes. "Of this, 80,000 tonnes is because of our MGNREGA efforts," Mohan said. The schemes have also improved the ecology in coal mine areas and made them safer for people by covering abandoned pits in the district which has a huge coal deposit, he said. Through 11 such schemes around 21.51 acres have been developed in coal mines of the district, he said adding that around 22 schemes have been used for re-excavation of water bodies and water harvesting. For improvement of social forestry, four schemes have been undertaken covering 6.25 acres. Social forestry means the management and protection of forests and afforestation on barren lands with the purpose of helping in the environmental, social and rural development. Five schemes have been taken under the MGNREGA here to improve rural connectivity covering 6.25 acres, he said. Also, the district administration has spent Rs 1.49 crore under 42 schemes in this financial year till February, generating 79,675 man- days. Under the MGNREGA programme, one member of each rural family is entitled to 100 days work per year. Centre's proposal of raise MGNREGA work days a poll gimmick'
"They have no constitutional right to do this. The move is nothing but an election gimmick. They won't be able to implement it. They accused the Centre of not releasing funds deemed just under a federal structure. Mukherjee, who also holds the Public Health Engineering portfolio, criticised the Centre for depriving the state of funds. "We have sent a report to the Centre that the state is not getting funds. The Centre is constitutionally bound to provide money for development of the state," he said. Mukherjee said his department had sought Rs 1200 crore from the Centre under the MGNREGA scheme. "The Centre had stopped giving funds for the past one-and-half months amounting to Rs 1200 crore. We have heard they have released Rs 400 crore, but the money has not reached us yet," he said. The state was also lacking funds for construction of rural roads under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) due to which contractors could not be paid, he said. "What we demand is our right and are not seeking any dole," he said. JharkhandChief Minister HEMANT SOREN has already accused the UPA government of denying funds under the MGNREGA and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan schemes. "They (the Centre) are spending so much money for the advertisement campaign, but are not giving us money for 100 days' work and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan," she said at a rally of tribals at Mal in Jalpaiguri district recently.
Capital and Finance Structure
FINDING AND SUGGESTION
Large scale social security programmes like MGNREA are subjected to undergo several stumbling blocks. Government and NGOs must study the impact of MGNREGA in khunti so as to ensure that this massive anti-poverty scheme is not getting diluted from its actual path and to see that the disparity in terms of socio-economic condition among people in rural and urban areas is reduced to considerable extend. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES: MGNREGA is perhaps the most ambitious anti-poverty scheme launched anywhere in the world. However, the scheme has shown several anomalies when it comes to implementation in the right manner. An analysis of the issues and challenges of MGNREGA is presented in this article. It may be understood that the problems and challenges are from both, Government and public. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES FACED BY THE GOVERNMTNT. The issues and challenges faced by Government are discussed below:
a) POOR PLANNING & ADMINISTRATIVE SKILL IN KHUNTI The representatives of the Central and State governments, as well as NGOs, reviewed the MGNREGA in the month of April, 2011. What emerged was the comment that the annual budget of Rs.40, 000 crore could be better utilized with more effective planning.
(3)Thus far, the panchayats, barring those in Karnataka and, to some extent, in those in West Bengal, have no experience at all in planning large-scale programmes. Even the report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has highlighted the lack of administrative capacity of the village panchayat members to run this scheme in a designed and decentralised manner.
b) LACK OF FOCUS ON OBJECTIVES IN KHUNTI Though Schedule One of the MGNREG Act referred to conservation of natural resources such as rainwater, land, forests, this was not reflected in the works floated for the scheme. 3 under this scheme, contractors and machineries should not be used. But in some work places, contractors were allowed and machineries were involved. And the erring officials claim that the works were done as if they were completed by workers and not by machines
c) LACK OF ADEQUATE MANPOWER IN KHUNTI Another issue is the deficiency of adequate administrative and technical manpower at the Block and Grama Panchayat (GP) Levels, especially at the level of programme officer, technical assistants, and Employment Guarantee Assistant Level etc. The lack of manpower
has adversely affected the preparation of plans, scrutiny, approval, monitoring and measurement of works, and maintenance of the stipulated records at the block and GP level. The CAG report points out that besides affecting the implementation of the scheme and the provision of employment, this also impacted adversely on transparency. (3)
d) DIFFICULTY IN FUNDING THE SCHEME TO KHUNTI Being one of the largest initiatives of its kind in the world, MGNREGA was started with an initial outlay of Rs.11, 300 crore in the year 2006-07 (almost 0.3% of GDP) and now fully operational, the annual budget for 2010-2011 is about Rs.40, 000 crore. The total outlay for the programme is increasing by leaps and bounds every financial year as exhibited in Table 1. It is possible through improved tax administration and reforms. But the TAX-GDP ratio has actually been falling. There are fears that the programme will end up costing 5% of GDP. 4Increase in the amount for funding the scheme Year Total Outlay Wage expenditure ( % of Total Outlay) 2006 07 $ 2.5 bn 66 2007 08 $ 2.6 bn 68 2008 09 $ 6.6 bn 67
2009 10 $ 8.68 bn 70 2010 - 11 $ 8.91 bn 71 e) DISCRIMINATION MGNREGA IN KHUNTI has provided a unique opportunity to people from rural India to earn their own income without any discrimination of caste or gender. The most remarkable feature of MGNREGA IN KHUNTI is that it pays women the same as men, something that was virtually unimaginable. However, cases of discrimination against women and people from backward groups are reported from several regions of the country.
Some states such as Kerala and Andhra Pradesh have registered high percentage of women workers getting enrolled in the scheme whereas others have registered a very low percentage of women availing benefit under MGNREGA. It has been reported that in some regions only a few job cards are issued when the applicants are women, or there are delays in the issue of cards. Women are sometimes told that manual labour under the MGNREGS is not meant for women and they could not participate in ongoing works as it entailed digging and removing soil. In some states, the powerful groups among the work force get large number of job cards. Statistics clearly indicate that the poverty alleviation programmes have had a minimal effect on poverty levels in India due to corruption. The actual funds that reach the beneficiaries are very little compared to the funds allocated for welfare schemes. Former Prime Minister, Rajive Gandhi had once said that out of every 100 paisa allocated for public welfare only 14 paisa
reaches the targeted people. 6 Further concerns, include the fact that corruption of the local governments leads to the exclusion of specific sections of the society. Local governments have also been found to claim that more people have received job cards than people who actually work in order to generate more fund than needed, to be then embezzled by local officials. Bribes as high Rs.50 are paid in order to receive the job card. 7 A multi-crore fraud has also been suspected where people have been issued under the MGNREGS card who is either employed with another Government job and who are not even aware that they have a job card. There are several cases of fake muster roll entries, over writing, false names and irregularities in job cards. Even the names of dead people who have not registered often feature in the muster rolls. g) MAOIST INSURGENCY IN KHUNTI Less than 9% of households in the 60 districts most affected by Maoist militancy found the required 100 days of employment under the countrys rural jobs programme in the year ended 31 March. The National average of households that have completed 100 days under the job guarantee plan last fiscal was also poor at 10.1% compared with 8.8% in the districts hit by the Maoist insurgency. The percentage of women employed under the programme in the insurgency hit districts in the same period was 44% compared with the national average of 48%.8 The poor performance of the scheme in these areas has prompted the Rural Development Ministry to boost the implementation of social and economic development programmes in the 60 Integrated Action Plan (IAP) districts in nine states, including Orissa, Khunti, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and West Bengal h) LACK OF SAFETY MEASURES IN KHUNTI Around one-third of the stipulated work force under MGNREGS is women. Therefore, Crches have to be set up so as to enable women carrying their children to the work site to do their work without much apprehension about their children.9 It is seen at the work place that women workers lay their children in cradles tied around tree branches. In the absence of this facility women may hesitate to come forward to demand for work. One of the objectives of the Scheme to strengthen women empowerment may go unrealized. Secondly, there must be a first-aid box available at the work site to provide medical assistance to the needy workers at the work sit if they get injured while at work. Importantly, life saving medicines must be kept at the work site because workers may get bitten by poisonous reptilians while clearing bushes. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES AMONG THE POPLE OF KHUNTI Following are the issues and challenges among the people covered under the Act.
a) INADEQUATE AWARENESS MGNREGA provides the rural poor a right to demand for work for 100 days in a financial year.
But peoples efforts to get jobs under this scheme have been stymied by the fact that Governments have done nothing to encourage people to register demands. The fact is that the national average for workdays generated under the scheme is less than half of the entitlement of 100 days per household, per year. Even in 2009- 2010, a severe drought year, only 54 days of work per household were generated. In 2010-2011, this number decreased to 46.79 days.10 Due to lack of awareness about the provisions of the Act, People are unaware of their basic entitlements under MGNREGA such as Job Cards, Minimum Wage Amount, Unemployment Allowance. The receipt for the application which is the basic record for claiming unemployment allowance. There is a widespread ignorance about how to avail the unemployment allowance; some times even the officials deliberately do not give out this information as they fear punishment for not providing jobs and poor awareness not only leads to corruption but also to poor management of the scheme and thus true potential of the MGNREGA is not being realized.(10)The Government must carry out an intensive training and awareness building programme to make the officials and citizens fully aware of all the details of the programme. People at the grass roots level must be made aware of RTI Act and encouraged to Use it. b) NON-PURPOSIVE SPENDING IN KHUNTI MGNREGA has obviously, increased the earning capacity of the rural people. But the spending pattern of the workers assumes significance because there is hardly any saving out of the wage earned from MGNREGS. For example, payment to the workers under MGNREGA is made in
cash in JHARKHAND state instead of through banks or post office accounts. 11 Raw cash in the hands leads to non-purposive spending. Lack of awareness on the impact of inflation and illiteracy level among the rural poor are the reasons for not saving part of their income from this scheme. In some cases, Men workers have the tendency of spending considerable portion of their earning from this scheme on drugs and liquor related products. Therefore, the chance of creating financial inclusion is missing and the idea of saving is wiped out of the minds of the rural poor
c) BEING UNORGANIZED IN KHUNTI In spite of large number of provisions under MGNREGA being in favor of workers, they could not enjoy their entitlements, such as getting work for the stipulated 100 days, unemployment allowances and basic amenities at the work site, on account of being unorganized. It seems to be a setback for the workers under the Act. Facing dipping demand for works under the scheme, the Jharkand State Government has decided to form unions of workers that will persuade people in villages to ask for more work. (12) This will help in streamlining the village planning process as well. But, it is still unclear under which laws, the proposed unions will function.