Love, Trauma, Identity: Morrisons

Discussion on Black Womanhood

by Soyoon Kim
FILE
TIME SUBMITTED 29-APR-2014 07:15AM
SUBMISSION ID 421601901
WORD COUNT 3598
CHARACTER COUNT 18123
C_BLOCK_AS_SOYOON_KIM.PDF (212.35K)
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
99/100
Love, Trauma, Identity: Morrisons Discussion on Black
Womanhood
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Soyoon, you have a wonderful and solid paper here. I
enjoyed reading about Morrison while looking through
the lens you have chosen. Your ideas Ae supported
well. You have a wonderful command of language. A
paper to be proud of as you finish your high school.
Definitely ready for college.
PAGE 1
Comment 1
Impressive opening.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
Improper Citation
Improper citation:
Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specific
citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Improper Citation
Improper citation:
Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specific
citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
PAGE 5
Comment 2
Who is this?
Comment 3
Who is this?
PAGE 6
Comment 4
Strong concluding remarks for this section.
PAGE 7
Comment 5
Add book title for clarity.
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
Comment 6
Lovely finish.
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
RUBRIC: AUTHOR STUDY 1
IDEAS/VOICE (50%)
EXEMPLARY
(5)
SKILLED
(4.50)
PROFICIENT
(4)
DEVELOPING
(3.50)
EMERGENT
(3)
ORGANIZATION (25%)
EXEMPLARY
(5)
0 / 5
0 / 5
Writer shows evidence of effective, thorough research and in-depth knowledge of subject. Research effectively
supports literary analysis of text with insightful observations and conclusions. Voice is objective and scholarly.
The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information, demonstrates critical thinking, and is
adequately supported. Student provides meaningful insights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literary
techniques (style), themes, and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.
Writer shows evidence of effective, thorough research and in-depth knowledge of subject.
Research effectively supports literary analysis of text with insightful observations and
conclusions. Voice is objective and scholarly. The approved Thesis Statement is focused
on valuable information, demonstrates critical thinking, and is adequately supported. Student
provides meaningful insights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literary
techniques (style), themes, and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.
Writer shows evidence of effective research and in-depth knowledge of subject. Research
effectively supports literary analysis of text with insightful observations and conclusions.
Voice is objective. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information,
demonstrates critical thinking, and is adequately supported. Student provides meaningful
insights about a reputable author of high literary merit, literary techniques (style), themes,
and selected text; independent reading is clearly evident.
Writer shows evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Research effectively
supports literary analysis of text with some insightful observations and conclusions. Voice
is objective. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable information and is
adequately supported. Student provides several meaningful insights about a reputable
author of literary merit; independent reading is evident.
Writer shows developing evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Research
supports literary analysis of text with few insightful observations and conclusions. Voice is
developing or inconsistent. The approved Thesis Statement is focused on valuable
information and is inadequately supported. Student provides few meaningful insights about a
reputable author of literary merit.
Writer shows emergent evidence of research and knowledge of subject. Little to no
Research supports literary analysis of text. The approved Thesis Statement is unidentifiable.
Student provides few meaningful insights about a reputable author of literary merit.
0 / 5
Introduction provides background on author and literary context, engages the reader, states thesis clearly and
summarizes controls. Pagination begins on page one of introduction; numbering follows MLA format. Paper is well
organized. Each paragraph grouping develops the thesis, addresses a specific control, and follows the outline.
Paragraphing is clearly developed, relates to thesis, uses well-developed supports, and employs appropriate
transitions. Paragraph divisions are logically placed. Conclusion effectively clarifies thesis, summarizes controls,
examines lessons learned from research, and ends with a solid clincher.
Organization is airtight and beyond expectation for grade 12.
SKILLED
(4.50)
PROFICIENT
(4)
DEVELOPING
(3.50)
EMERGENT
(3)
SOURCE DOCUM. (15%)
EXEMPLARY
(5)
SKILLED
(4.50)
PROFICIENT
(4)
DEVELOPING
(3.50)
EMERGENT
(3)
CONVENTIONS (10%)
Organization is quite strong and reaches the highest standard for grade 12.
Organization is proficient for grade 12 with most of the criteria here being met.
Organization is suffering but readable with some of the criteria here being met.
Organization is floundering and inhibits a reader from accessing the information. Few of the
criteria are met.
0 / 5
Paper parenthetically cites several direct quotes, paraphrases, and summary information in appropriate MLA
format. Parenthetical Documentation includes last name of author, or first important word of title as listed on Works
Cited Page, and page numbers if available. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list approved, academic
sources in alphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriate MLA format.
Paper parenthetically cites several direct (and meaty) quotes, paraphrases, and summary
information in appropriate MLA format. No plagiarism. Parenthetical Documentation includes
last name of author, or first important word of title as listed on Works Cited Page, and page
numbers if available. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list academic sources in
alphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriate
MLA format. All source documentation aligns between WCP and intext citation.
Paper parenthetically cites several direct quotes, paraphrases, and summary information in
appropriate MLA format. No plagiarism. Parenthetical Documentation is in proper MLA
structure.. Works Cited & Works Consulted Pages list , some academic sources in
alphabetical order by author, or by first important word of title, and demonstrate appropriate
MLA format. Most source documentation aligns between WCP and intext citation.
A few questions may arise regarding either proper citation formatting or usage. WCP and
intext documentation are pretty solid but may have a few gaps. Students mostly utilizes
proper source documentation. Inconsequential questions of plagiarism.
Questions arise regarding either proper citation formatting or usage. WCP and intext
documentation are pretty solid but may have a few gaps. Students begins to utilize proper
source documentation; questions of plagiarism.
Sloppiness or clear gaps in understanding how to properly document a research paper.
Definite problems with plagiarism. In the case of gross plagiarism, the paper may receive an
F.
0 / 5
Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. *An electronic copy will be
submitted to turnitin.com prior to the in-class due date. *No title page is required. Sentences utilize proper structure
and variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates strong control of spelling, grammar, usage, consistent verb
tense, and punctuation. Word Choice/Diction is formal, objective, and varied; tone is academic. Paper incorporates
a variety of sophisticated rhetorical devices.
EXEMPLARY
(5)
SKILLED
(4.50)
PROFICIENT
(4)
DEVELOPING
(3.50)
EMERGENT
(3)
Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentences
utilize proper structure and variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates strong control of
spelling, grammar, usage, consistent verb tense, and punctuation. Paper incorporates a
variety of sophisticated rhetorical devices.
Final draft is neatly typed, carefully edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentences
utilize proper structure and variety in phrasing and length. Paper indicates control of
conventions. Paper incorporates a variety of rhetorical devices.
Final draft is typed, edited, and double-spaced with MLA heading. Sentences utilize proper
structure. Paper indicates good control of conventions. Paper may incorporate a variety of
rhetorical devices.
Final draft is typed with little attention to MLA formatting. Sentences begin to inhibit the
reader's understanding. Paper indicates poor control of conventions.
This is clearly not a final draft.