This document outlines the design requirements for CANDU nuclear fuel over different time periods from the 1950s onwards. The original 1950s criteria stated that the fuel must be safe, have good neutron economy, meet power specifications, be easily handled, and be cheap. Requirements in the 1970s centered around compatibility with the heat transport system, fuel channels, and fuel handling systems. Additional seismic requirements were added in the 1980s. Recent requirements from the 1990s focus on higher operating margins, lower power pulses during accidents, and lower coolant void reactivity.
This document outlines the design requirements for CANDU nuclear fuel over different time periods from the 1950s onwards. The original 1950s criteria stated that the fuel must be safe, have good neutron economy, meet power specifications, be easily handled, and be cheap. Requirements in the 1970s centered around compatibility with the heat transport system, fuel channels, and fuel handling systems. Additional seismic requirements were added in the 1980s. Recent requirements from the 1990s focus on higher operating margins, lower power pulses during accidents, and lower coolant void reactivity.
This document outlines the design requirements for CANDU nuclear fuel over different time periods from the 1950s onwards. The original 1950s criteria stated that the fuel must be safe, have good neutron economy, meet power specifications, be easily handled, and be cheap. Requirements in the 1970s centered around compatibility with the heat transport system, fuel channels, and fuel handling systems. Additional seismic requirements were added in the 1980s. Recent requirements from the 1990s focus on higher operating margins, lower power pulses during accidents, and lower coolant void reactivity.
CANDU FUEL TECHNOLOGY COURSE 2008 J anuary Al Manzer CANTECH Associates Pg 2 Outline Original Design Criteria and CANDU Fuel History Fuel Element Design Features (see notes) Fuel Bundle Design Features (see notes) Fuel Design Requirements for 1970s Fuel Design Requirements for 1980s Fuel Design Requirements for 1990s+ Pg 3 Introduction (cont.) The design is verified by a number of methods: Engineering analysis Simulation bymodelling. Materials tests. Type testing. Pg 4 Pg 5 Birth of CANDU Fuel (1950s) Original NPD Reactor Design in 1954: 10 MWPlant Vertical pressure vessel Off-power refuelling Long fuel assemblies (=core length) Uraniummetal as fuel material Stainless steel fuel cladding being considered NPD redesigned, construction halted in 1957: 20 MWPlant Horizontal with Zralloy pressure tubes On-power refuelling Short fuel bundles (19.5 inches long) UraniumOxide ceramic as fuel material Zralloy fuel cladding Pg 6 Criteria for Fuel Development (1950s) W.B. Lewis stated that CANDU Fuel: Must be safe, reliable, low risk of release of radioactive fission products no systematic fuel failures Must have good neutron economy, i.e., low neutron absorption materials Must meet power specifications, i.e., 1 MWper fuel bundle no distortion in 1-4 years in-reactor Must be easily handled Must be cheap 1 mils/kWh (0.1 cents/kWh) Pg 7 CANDU Fuel Bundle Types (Past) 7 Element NPD(1st Charge) 19 Element (9 reactors) 18 Element CANDU BLW (1 reactor) NPD Raps 1 NPD Raps 2 KANUPP Maps 1 Douglas Point Maps 2 Naps 1 Naps 2 Gentilly1 Pg 8 CANDU Fuel Bundle Types (Present) 28 Element Pickering (8 reactors) 37 Element Bruce/Darlington (12 reactors) 37 Element CANDU 6 (10 reactors) Pickering 1 Pickering 5 Pickering 2 Pickering 6 Pickering 3 Pickering 7 Pickering 4 Pickering 8 Bruce 1 Bruce 5 Darlington 1 Bruce 2 Bruce 6 Darlington 2 Bruce 3 Bruce 7 Darlington 3 Bruce 4 Bruce 8 Darlington 4 Pt Lepreau Gentilly2 Embalse Wolsong 1-4 Cernavoda Qinshan 1-2 Pg 9 CANDU Fuel Bundle Types (Present) 43 Element CANFLEX LVRF (replacing 37 Element in Bruce B) AECL/KAERI/Bruce Power Project Demonstration Irradiation started 2006 in Bruce B Pg 10 Fuel Design Requirements (1970s) CANDU Fuel must meet the requirements imposed by the reactor interfacing systems: Heat Transport System(or Primary Coolant Circuit) Fuel Channels Fuel Handling Systems Fuel Management(Nuclear Design, or Reactor Physics) Reactor interfacing systemsmust meet requirements imposed by CANDU Fuel Pg 11 Fuel Duty Cycle Pg 12 Heat Transport System Requirements on Fuel Design 1. The pressure drop over fuel bundles in each fuel channel must be compatible with the design allowance of the heat transport system. 2. The fuel must withstand flow induced vibration. 3. The thermal performance of the bundle must be acceptable for all normal operating conditions. 4. The fuel elements must withstand the coolant pressure during normal operation. 5. The fuel elements must contain fission products during normal operation. 6. The uraniumcontamination on surfaces of the as-manufactured fuel bundles must be minimized. Pg 13 Fuel Channel Pg 14 Fuel Channel Requirements on Fuel Design 1. The bearing pads must not reduce the wall thickness of the pressure tube below the design allowance. 2. The fuel bundle must withstand the loads caused by the coolant hydraulic drag (and the fuelling machine ram). 3. The fuel bundle must not jamin the fuel channel. Pg 15 Pg 16 Full Length Fuel Channel Pg 17 CANDU 6 Fuelling Scheme FLOW ---> 1 2 3 4 5 6 SHIELD PLUG REMOVED, 1st BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 1st NEW BUNDLE SWEPT BY COOLANT REFUELLING IMPACT N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 2nd NEW BUNDLE PUSHED INTO POSITION N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 2nd BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 3rd BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 FUEL COLUMN DISPLACED TO ALLOW F/M MAGAZINE ROTATION N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 4th BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N F/M RAM STOPS AT CORE LINE, COOLANT DRAG PUSHES FUEL N N N N N N SHIELD PLUGS RELOADED AND LOCKED N N N N N N FUELLING MACHINE ENDFITTING AXIAL F 7 8 9 10 11 12 SHIELD PLUG UNLOCKED 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SIDESTOPS INSERTED SHIELD PLUG UNLOADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1st BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2nd BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3rd BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4th BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 SHIELD PLUG READY FOR LOADING N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 N N 1 2 3 4 CORE ENDFITTING FUELLING MACHINE FLOW REGION Pg 18 Fuel Loading Sequence (Upstream End) SHIELD PLUG REMOVED, 1st BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N 1 2 3 1st NEW BUNDLE SWEPT BY COOLANT REFUELLING IMPACT N N 1 2 3 2nd NEW BUNDLE PUSHED INTO POSITION N N 1 2 3 2nd BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N 1 2 3 3rd BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N N N 1 2 3 FUEL COLUMN DISPLACED TO ALLOW F/M MAGAZINE ROTATION N N N N N N 1 2 3 4th BUNDLE PAIR LOADED N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 FLOW ---> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pg 19 Fuel Unloading Sequence (Downstream End) Bundle 12 loaded against Sidestops Bundle 4 loaded against Sidestops SIDESTOPS INSERTED SHIELD PLUG UNLOADED 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1st BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2nd BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3rd BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4th BUNDLE PAIR UNLOADED N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 SHIELD PLUG READY FOR LOADING N N N N 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pg 20 Fuel Unloading Sequence (Upstream End) Bundle 12 loaded against Sidestops Coolant Drag >Friction Bundle 4 loaded against Sidestops N N N N N N N N 1 2 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pg 21 Fuel Handling System Requirements on Fuel Design 1. The fuel bundle must not jamin the fuel handling systems. 2. Duringrefuelling, the fuel bundle must withstand the loads caused by cross flow in the liner hole region of theendfittings. 3. The fuel bundle must withstandrefuellingimpacts. 4. The fuel bundle must have sufficient flexibility to allow for differential expansion of the fuel elements and parallelogramming(or tilt of bundle)within a sagged pressure tube. Pg 22 Fuel Management Requirements on Fuel Design 1. The ends of the fuel bundles must minimize neutron absorption and withstand end flux peaking due to the gap between the UO 2 in adjacent bundles. 2. The fuel bundles must be able to operate at high powers continuously. 3. The fuel bundle must withstand power changes due to refuelling and movement of the reactivity control mechanismsrefuellingimpacts. Pg 23 Fuel Design Requirements on Other Systems 1. The interfacing systems must not cause systematic fuel failures. (translates to at least 22 specific requirements!) 2. The components of the fuel channel and fuel handling systems must have sufficient allowance to protect against damage due to the interaction of fuel. (translates to at least 4 specific requirements!) Pg 24 Fuel Design Requirements (1980s) 1. In response to the seismic requirements of a potential CANDU reactor client, AECL agreed to include one more fuel design requirement 2. Fuel bundle must be able to withstand seismic loads while inside the pressure boundary of the heat transport system. For a design basis earthquake, the fuel must maintain coolable geometry and the fuel elements must contain fission products. Pg 25 Fuel Design Requirements (1990s+) In recent years some CANDU users (Bruce Power) have developed new requirements for fuel which may require new design features: 1. Higher operating margins for dryout. 2. Lower power pulses during Loss of coolant accidents. 3. Lower coolant void reactivity (Fuel enrichment, burnable poisons) Pg 26
Gas-Engines and Producer-Gas Plants
A Practice Treatise Setting Forth the Principles of Gas-Engines and Producer Design, the Selection and Installation of an Engine, Conditions of Perfect Operation, Producer-Gas Engines and Their Possibilities, the Care of Gas-Engines and Producer-Gas Plants, with a Chapter on Volatile Hydrocarbon and Oil Engines