'The political power of social media' by clay shirky. 'Politics and the English language' by george orwell. Media are not only used as communication tool but also a coordinating tools for world's political movements.
'The political power of social media' by clay shirky. 'Politics and the English language' by george orwell. Media are not only used as communication tool but also a coordinating tools for world's political movements.
'The political power of social media' by clay shirky. 'Politics and the English language' by george orwell. Media are not only used as communication tool but also a coordinating tools for world's political movements.
Part 2 (Copy and complete these forms for each PAIR of articles you read. Attach the complete forms to the articles)
1) Article Recommendations
Article 1 Title : The Political Power of Social Media Author : Clay Shirky Source (complete) :http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/cla y-shirky/the-political-power-of-social-media Release date (complete) : January/February 2011 Brief description : This article tells us about the use of media as tools of political movements which form public opinion and coordinate real-world action.
My Rating : (check off one.) Thumbs Up Okay Thumbs Down Article 2 Title : Politics and the English Language Author : George Orwell Source (complete) :http://www.unz.org/Pub/Horizon-1946apr-00252 Release date (complete) :April 1946 Brief description : This article tells us about language (English) which used as political instruments to conceal the real meaning or intention of someone or a particular group of people.
My Rating : (check off one.) Thumbs Up Okay Thumbs Down
2) Article Analyses
Process Text 1 (title): The Political Power of Social Media Summary Media, especially Social Media today are not only used as communication tool but also as coordinating tools for worlds political movements.For example when a particular group of people wants to attack their political rival, they use media to spread bad information so public will give bad prejudice to their rival and start to against the rival as well. Politicians or even the government also use social media as an instrument to form public opinion of an issue since political and apolitical speeches nowadays are not mutually exclusive. They use brands or public figure in media to attract people so they (the people) will listen to politicians or governments idea.
Analysis o Purpose: To inform people about the use of media as political instruments
o Main idea: Media are not only used as communication tool but also a coordinating tools for political movement
o Audience: Society
o Tone:
Evaluation: Are the writers opinions justified (supported with verifiable, relevant facts)? Explain your answer and give evidence.
In this article, writer opinions are justified, supported by some facts which mostly related to political news around the world. For example in the first paragraph the writer explained about a president in Philippine was judged as corruptor by his own people after they know the corruption information from media. The next is many South Korean girls protest US beef import since public figure in Korea, DBSK, who is actually not politicians, brings the issue in the internet. Beef import is actually governments business. Since the public figure came out with the issue, lots of Korean girls are excited to talk and give their opinion towards it. Reflection: How did this text affect my thoughts on this subject?As I know to the example when particular group of people wants to attack their political rival. They use media to spread bad information, so public will give bad prejudice to their rival and start to against the rival as well.
Process Text 2 (title): Politics and the English Language Summary Nowadays, lots of people use English in a bad way to hide the real meaning. They use metaphors or longer words to explain one word which makes the word are hard to be understood. For example they use some words like fishing in troubled water which other people are hard to find out what is the real meaning of it. Politicians use this bad English to express their intention. They will say elimination of unreliable elements instead of shooting people in the back of the neck. In other words, politics is a mass of lies and either language used. Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.
Analysis o Purpose: To inform people about political language which is used to conceal the real meaning of a thought o Main idea: English is used as an instrument to hide the real meaning of an issue in politics.
o Audience: Society
o Tone:
Evaluation: Are the writers opinions justified (supported with verifiable, relevant facts)? Explain your answer and give evidence.
In this article, writer opinions are justified. Although this article mostly about his own opinion but related to the use of metaphors in English which cause a word become hard to be understood is correct. In page 7 the first paragraph the writer give some example of political language which commonly used by some politicians to conceal their brutal acts.
Reflection: How did this text affect my thoughts on this subject? According to the text, they use petaphors or longer words to explain one word which makes the word are hard to be understood.
3. Text Synthesis
1) Compare the ideas of the two articles. What do they have in common? What makes them different? List the similar and different ideas in the following table.
Similar Ideas Different Ideas Article 1 Article 2 Both of the articles tell about political instruments used by the politician to coordinate people.
The main discussion in article 1 is social media as an instrument of political movements The main discussion in article 2 is the use of English in politics to conceal the real meaning of words or thought
1) Article Recommendations
Article 1 Title : Facial Recognition: Is the Technology Taking Away Your Identity? Author : Luke Dormehl Source (complete) :http://www.theguardian.com/technology/ 2014/may/04/facial-recognition-technology- identity-tesco-ethical-issues Release date (complete) : May, 4 th 2014 Brief description :This article tell about the facial recognition Technology which may takes our identity or privacy
My Rating : (check off one.) Thumbs Up Okay Thumbs Down Article 2 Title :Modern technology is changing the way our brains work, says neuroscientist Author :Susan Greenfield Source (complete) :http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article- 565207/Modern-technology-changing-way-brains- work-says-neuroscientist.html Release date (complete) :May, 15 th 2014 Brief description :This article tells about the role of modern technology to humans brain
My Rating : (check off one.) Thumbs Up Okay Thumbs Down
2) Article Analyses
Process Text 1 (title):Facial Recognition: Is the Technology Taking Away Your Identity? Summary Facial recognition is a brand-new technology which allows the users to identify themselves or other by using images. Lots of companies such as Google and Facebook use this technology identify people based on images. Apple also uses this technology as a security measure for unlocking its device. But since this technology is required to take a photo of someone and then input some information related to the person, there are some privacy problems. Not all people want to be identified. Another problem is what if the facial recognition made mistake in recognizing people? Some people were born almost look- alike. Still, facial recognition as a computer technology continues to get better and will be very helpful. Analysis o Purpose: To inform people about facial recognition technology and its plus-minus
o Main idea: Facial recognition is a technology which allows users to identify someone by using images
o Audience: Society
o Tone:
Evaluation: Are the writers opinions justified (supported with verifiable, relevant facts)? Explain your answer and give evidence.
In this article, writer opinions are justified, supported by some facts about the facial recognition technology in our lives. The facial recognition technology can be helpful for our lives but also it can be bother others privacy. In page 2, US senator Al Franken has spoken out against this apps. According to him, individuals cannot reasonably prevent themselves from being identified by cameras that could be anywhere.
Reflection: How did this text affect my thoughts on this subject? In my opinion there are some privacy problems that disturbed us.
Process Text 2 (title):Modern Technology Changing Ways Brain Works Summary Nowadays technology has changed how the brain works. It can be seen by the numbers of people who use such drugs to get rid of depression, shyness, or improve their concentration. There are benefits from this technological progress (the use of drugs) but also there is a great danger as well. Human brains have been changing, adapting, and developing in response to outside stimuli. Electronic device such as television or video games also can affect the way brain works, in this case our personality, behavior, or characteristic. Analysis o Purpose: To inform people about the advantage and danger of technology to humans brain o Main idea: Technology has changed how the brain works o Audience: Society
o Tone:
Evaluation: Are the writers opinions justified (supported with verifiable, relevant facts)? Explain your answer and give evidence.
In this article, writer opinions are justified. Some technology such as drugs, TV, and video game are changing the way we behave and think. The writer gives example in page 3; three groups of people were taken into a room with a piano with different treatment for each group, group one given intensive piano practice, group two had nothing to do, and group three were asked to imagine they were practicing piano. In a brain scan, the group which asked to imagine doing piano exercise has changes in brain structure as the group which had piano practice.
Reflection: How did this text affect my thoughts on this subject? Human brains have been changing, adapting, and developing in response to outside stimuli.
3. Text Synthesis
1) Compare the ideas of the two articles. What do they have in common? What makes them different? List the similar and different ideas in the following table.
Similar Ideas Different Ideas Article 1 Article 2 Both of the articles tell about both advantage and disadvantage of using modern technology in our lives
The main discussion in article 1 is face recognizing technology which can be helpful but also bother peoples privacy The main discussion in article 2 is about modern technology which change the way brain works