Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C using mainly
acetonitrile as a solvent at different contact times. Increase in the reaction temperature to 325
C
[18]. Above 360
C in static conditions
for 12 h.
The molar composition of the gel was
SiO
2
: 9.0 EtOH : 0.20 CTAB : 160 H
2
O
The resulting precipitate was recovered by ltra-
tion, washed with deionised water, dried in air at
ambient temperature and nally calcined at 550
C
for 1 h in a nitrogen ow and then in air for
12 h.
Catalyst samples with different loadings of PWA
(E-Merck, AR Grade, India), were prepared by stir-
ring 1.0 g of SiMCM-41 with 10 ml of an aqueous
solution containing 0.1, 0.3 or 0.5 g PWA at room
temperature for 24 h. The resultant mixture was l-
tered, dried at 80
C for
2 h.
2.2. Characterisation
The mesoporous materials were characterised by
XRD (Rigaku, D-Max/IIIVC model) using nickel l-
tered Cu K radiation, = 1.5406 ; surface area
measurements were done by a NOVA 1200, Quan-
tachrome (USA) instrument. FT-IR spectra were taken
on the instrument Bio-RAD FTS 175c FT-IR using
catalyst samples supported on KBr wafers. Surface
area, pore volume and pore size description details of
the catalysts are given in Table 1.
2.3. Reaction procedure
Cyclohexanone oxime (Aldrich), acetonitrile, ben-
zene and ethanol (Analytical Grade, E-Merck, India)
were used as solvents for dissolving oxime without
further purication. The vapor-phase Beckmann rear-
rangement of cyclohexanone oxime to -caprolactam
was carried out using a xed bed vertical down
ow reactor (length, 45 cm; diameter, 19 mm) with
a catalyst charge of 1.5 g (1020 mesh). Prior to the
start of the experiment, the catalyst was activated
at 330
C on
R. Maheswari et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 248 (2003) 291301 295
Fig. 2. FT-IR spectra of (a) PWA; (b) 10 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41; (c) 30 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41; (d) 50 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41.
SiMCM-41 as well as on PWA-supported SiMCM-41
catalysts. Fig. 3 shows the variation of oxime con-
version as well as the selectivity of prime product
-caprolactam and others. Cyclohexanone oxime
conversion increases from around 70% at 250
C
and reaches a steady state of nearly 100% around
300
C,
-caprolactam selectivity generally decreases and the
decrease is signicant beyond 325
C. Of the cat-
alysts studied, 30 wt.% PWA shows a conversion
of 100% and -caprolactam selectivity of 75%
at 300
C.
3.2.2. Effect of space velocity
The inuence of feed rate of the reactant oxime on
the surface of 30 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41 was studied
by using 10 wt.% cyclohexanone oxime in acetoni-
trile at 325
C; N
2
carrier = ml/h; time on stream = 2 h.
of proton shift is visualised to take place as follows:
We have chosen benzene (non-polar), ethanol
(medium polar) and acetonitrile (highly polar) as sol-
vents for cyclohexanone oxime to study the polarity
of solvents on conversion and the selectivity of the
products for this reaction. Each reaction has been
carried out for a period of 7 h, collecting the product
samples at every hour and analysing them. The sol-
vent effect and time on stream on cyclohexanone
oxime transformation are shown in Fig. 5. Ten per-
cent by weight of cyclohexanone oxime in the se-
lected solvent has been chosen and the feed rate has
been maintained at WHSV 3.24 h
1
and reaction
298 R. Maheswari et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 248 (2003) 291301
Table 2
Effect of oxime concentration in the feed on cyclohexanone oxime transformation over 30 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41
Oxime concentration (wt.%) WHSV (h
1
) Oxime conversion (%) Product selectivity (%) -Caprolactam
yield (%)
A B C
5 2.92 100 84 11 5 84
10 3.24 99 74 18 9 73
20 3.88 90 62 23 16 56
(A) -caprolactam; (B) cyanopentene +cyanopentane; (C) cyclohexanone +cyclohexenone. Catalyst weight = 1.5 g; solvent = acetonitrile;
feed = 5 ml/h; N
2
carrier = 20 ml/h; temperature = 325
C.
Fig. 5. Effect of solvent and time on stream on cyclohexanone oxime transformation using (a) benzene; (b) ethanol; (c) acetonitrile as
solvent over 30 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41. Catalyst weight = 1.5 g; feed = 10 wt.% cyclohexanone oxime in solvent; WHSV = 3.24 h
1
;
temperature = 325
C; N
2
carrier = 20 ml/h.
temperature at 325
C; N
2
carrier = 20 ml/h.
50% whereas 30 wt.% PWA catalyst shows a higher
selectivity of 75%. Increasing the PWA loading to
50 wt.% brings down the -caprolactam selectivity to
20%, even though the conversion is maintained at
>99%. The fact that there is a good conversion com-
parable to that of the PWA-loaded SiMCM-41 shows
that the SiMCM-41 itself is active for this transforma-
tion reaction. Many reports claim that the SiMCM-41
is nearly neutral or weakly acidic. It appears that
the inherent acidity in SiMCM-41 is sufcient for
the oxime conversion. The observation that 10 wt.%
PWA shows the same conversion and -caprolactam
selectivity as that of pristine SiMCM-41 indicates
that the added PWA is not available for the reaction.
This is conrmed by the identity of the XRD pat-
terns of SiMCM-41 and 10 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41
being the same (Fig. 1). On 30 wt.% PWA loading of
SiMCM-41, XRD patterns show crystalline PWA on
the surface. These crystalline PWA, which may be well
dispersed, contribute to the -caprolactam selectivity.
However, further loading of SiMCM-41 with PWA
(50 wt.%) brings down the -caprolactam selectivity,
though the oxime conversion is the same as in the
case of other catalysts. In 50 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41,
the PWA may be large and bulky agglomerates and
these may not contribute to the selectivity. These
observations lead to the conclusion that the cyclohex-
anone oxime transformation can take place even on
pristine SiMCM-41. Addition of PWA up to 30 wt.%
contributes to the selectivity of -caprolactam, be-
cause of the contribution to acidity by well-dispersed
PWA. However, bulk PWA that may be too strong in
acidity is not helpful for -caprolactam selectivity.
4. Conclusions
The cyclohexanone oxime transformation reactions
over SiMCM-41 as well as PWA-loaded SiMCM-41
are studied at different reaction conditions of temper-
ature, contact time and time on stream. SiMCM-41
itself is an active catalyst for this reaction. Ad-
dition of PWA improves mainly the selectivity of
-caprolactam. Between 300 and 325
C, a con-
version of >99% with -caprolactam selectivity of
75% is achieved on 30 wt.% PWA/SiMCM-41 using
10 wt.% cyclohexanone oxime in acetonitrile feed.
Well-dispersed PWA helps -caprolactam selectivity,
even though oxime conversion is insensitive to PWA
addition. Conversion being the same, the selectivity
of -caprolactam and of other products, cyanopentene
and cyclohexanone, depend on reaction variables;
the selectivity of -caprolactam is inversely related
to that of cyanopentene because of the competi-
tive nature of formation of these products from the
oxime.
R. Maheswari et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 248 (2003) 291301 301
Acknowledgements
SN thanks the CSIR, New Delhi for the Emeritus
Scientist Position. The authors wish to thank Depart-
ment of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi,
for providing nancial support. We thank the Direc-
tor of IICT for extending the facilities to carry out the
characterization work.
References
[1] Kirk-Othmer. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 4,
fourth ed., Wiley, New York, 1995, p. 827.
[2] O. Immel, H.H. Schwarz, G. Starke, W. Swodenk, Chem.
Ing. Technol. 56 (1984) 612.
[3] T. Ushikubo, K. Wada, J. Catal. 148 (1994) 138.
[4] P.B. Venuto, P.S. Landis, J. Catal. 6 (1966) 245.
[5] D.C. England, Process for Manufacturing Caprolactam. US
Patent 2,634,269 (1953).
[6] I.S. Fisher, Improvements in or Relating to the Production of
Amides and Lactams, UK Patent 881,276 (1961).
[7] A. Costa, P.M. Deya, J.V. Sinisterra, J.M. Marinas, Can. J.
Chem. 58 (1980) 1266.
[8] P. Vitarelli, S. Cavallaro, R. Maggiore, G. Cimino, C. Caristi,
S. Galvagno, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 112 (1982) 493.
[9] T. Curtin, J.B. McMonagle, B.K. Hodnett, Appl. Catal. A 93
(1992) 91.
[10] T. Curtin, J.B. McMonagle, B.K. Hodnett, Appl. Catal. A 93
(1992) 75.
[11] T. Curtin, J.B. McMonagle, M. Ruwet, B.K. Hodnett, J. Catal.
142 (1993) 172.
[12] S. Sato, K. Hirose, M. Kitamura, H. Tojima, N. Ishii,
European Patent 236,092 (1987).
[13] S. Sato, H. Sakurai, K. Urabe, Y. Izumi, Chem. Lett. 3 (1985)
277.
[14] A. Aucejo, M.C. Burguet, A. Corma, V. Fornes, Appl. Catal.
22 (1986) 187.
[15] H. Sato, K. Hirose, M. Kitamura, Y. Nakamura, Stud. Surf.
Sci. Catal. 49 (1989) 1213.
[16] L.-X. Dai, R. Hayasaka, Y. Iwaki, K.A. Koyano, T. Tatsumi,
Chem. Commun. 9 (1996) 1071.
[17] H. Sato, K. Hirose, N. Ishii, Y. Umada, European Patent
234,088 (1986).
[18] H. Sato, K. Hirose, Y. Nakamura, Chem. Lett. (1993) 1987.
[19] K. Chaudhari, R. Bal, A.J. Chandwadkar, S. Sivasanker, J.
Mol. Catal. A 177 (2002) 247.
[20] T. Komatsu, T. Maeda, T. Yashima, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 3536 (2000) 173.
[21] Y.M. Chung, H.K. Rhee, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 159 (2000)
389.
[22] T. Takahashi, M. Nishi, Y. Tagawa, T. Kai, Microporous
Mater. 3 (1995) 467.
[23] J.S. Reddy, R. Rvaisankar, S. Sivasanker, P. Ratnasamy, Catal.
Lett. 17 (1993) 139.
[24] P. OSullivan, L. Forni, B.K. Hodnett, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
40 (2001) 1471.
[25] H. Sato, N. Ishii, K. Hirose, S. Nakamura, Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal. 28 (1986) 755.
[26] J. Rseler, G. Heitmann, W.F. Hlderich, Appl. Catal. A 144
(1996) 319.
[27] G.P. Heitmann, G. Dahlhoff, W.F. Hlderich, J. Catal. 186
(1999) 12.
[28] G. Dahlhoff, G.P. Heitmann, J.P.M. Niederer, W.F. Hlderich,
J. Catal. 194 (2000) 122.
[29] T. Yashima, K. Miura, T. Komatsu, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 84
(1994) 1897.
[30] G. Dahlhoff, U. Barsnick, W.F. Hlderich, Appl. Catal. A
210 (2001) 83.
[31] M. Busio, J. Janchen, J.H.C. Van Hoff, Microporous Mater.
5 (1995) 211.
[32] A. Corma, V. Fornes, M.T. Navarro, J. Perez-Pariarte, J. Catal.
148 (1994) 569.
[33] M. Kitamura, H. Ichihashi, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 90 (1994)
67.
[34] N. Katada, T. Tsubouchi, M. Niwa, Y. Murakami, Appl. Catal.
A 124 (1995) 1.
[35] E.R. Herrero, O.A. Anunziata, L.B. Pierella, O.A. Oria, Latin
Am. Appl. Res. 24 (1994) 195.
[36] T. Curtin, J.B. McMonagle, B.K. Hodnett, Catal. Lett. 17
(1993) 145.
[37] A. Corma, H. Garcia, J. Primo, Zeolites 11 (1991) 593.
[38] H. Sato, K. Hirose, Chem. Lett. (1993) 1765.
[39] G.P. Heitmann, G. Dalhlhoff, W.F. Holderich, J. Catal. 186
(1999) 12.
[40] T. Yashima, K. Miura, T. Komatsu, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 84
(1994) 1897.
[41] S. Narayanan, K. Krishna, Chem. Commun. (1997) 1991.
[42] S. Narayanan, K. Krishna, Appl. Catal. A 174 (1998)
221.
[43] S. Narayanan, K. Krishna, Catal. Today 49 (1999) 57.
[44] S. Narayanan, K. Krishna, Appl. Catal. A 198 (2000) 13.
[45] J.S. Beck, J.C. Vartuli, W.J. Roth, M.E. Leonowicz, C.T.
Kresge, K.D. Schmitt, C.T.-W. Chu, D.H. Olson, E.W.
Sheppard, S.B. McCullen, J.B. Higgins, J.L. Schlenker, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10834.
[46] C.-Y. Chen, H.-X. Li, M.E. Davis, Microporous Mater. 2
(1993) 17.
[47] C. Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, M. Fournier, R. Frank, R.
Thouvenot, Inorg. Chem. 22 (1983) 207.