[Diplomacy] Nepal Logjam (Part 1 of 3): Civil War,
Peace-Deal, Constitutional deadlock, Frequent
change of Prime Ministers
1. During British-Raj 2. From 60s to 90s 3. The 90s system 4. 1996-2006: Civil War 5. Indias Nepal Policy: 2005 6. Main Political Parties 7. Constituent Assembly(CA) 8. Why is there a political crisis/logjam/turmoil in Nepal? 9. Why No Constitution? o #1: Presidential system vs Parliamentary system o #2: Federation on Ethnic lines 10. Taarikh pe Taarikh 11. Pushpa Kamals Prachand Dhamaal 12. Madhav Nepals lack of Dhamaal During British-Raj There was alliance agreement between British and Nepal King. Under which: British Indian Army will recruit Gurkha soldiers from Nepal. Nepal King will accept British guidance on foreign policy matters. The British will protect Nepalese Kings against both foreign and domestic enemies and will not interfere in the internal matters / domestic affairs of Nepal. 1947: British withdraw from India. Nepal King has no external source of support anymore. Now the Anti-King forces led by Nepali Congress (NC) party, launched a revolution in 1950. King accepted settlement, Constitution drafted, general elections held. From 60s to 90s The Nepali Congress (NC) party won majority, and formed the Government. But there was frequent power struggle between the PM and the King. In early 60s, the King dismissed the parliament, banned all political parties. He passed a new Constitution- Now crown became the real source of authority. This system continued for years, but in 1990 there was huge uprising and protests by people. (this is known as First Jan Andolan.) Finally, King accepts multiparty parliamentary system. New election is held, new Constitution is written. The 90s system It was more or less the same as British monarchy. King remained the head of state. King appointed the leader of the majority party in the lower house as Prime minister. If there was no clear majority, King appointed a leader who enjoyed support of majority coalitional partners. 1996-2006: Civil War From outside Nepal looks like a tourist economy but most of the tourism is confined to Katmandu valley only. Because other places in Nepal dont have much infrastructure (hotels, good roads, electricity, communication etc.) Governments policies hardly upgraded the socio-economic status of rural people. Most of the foreign aid for poor, was chowed down by corrupt politicians and bureaucrats. Ethnic division was becoming sharp. (Madeshis vs higher caste Brahman+Chhetris). While the 1990s Constitution provided for multi-party system, elections etc. But still the political power rested in the hands of elites, noble families of Nepali Congress (NC) etc. These socio-economic issues led to rise of Maoists elements. Finally in 1996, they started armed struggle against the popularly elected Nepali Government+ King. Their Peoples liberation Army took control over many rural and remote parts of Nepal, started seizing properties of rich peasants, holding kangaroo courts, murder, abduction, etc.etc.etc. you get the picture. Maoists demanded following 1. Abolish Monarchy. 2. Frame a new Constitution for Nepal. 3. Create a system of directly elected President. 4. Divide Nepal into provinces according to ethnic lines. 5. Redraw relations with India. (regarding border, trade, water sharing etc.) Indias Nepal Policy: 2005 Since the beginning, India had supported Monarchy in Nepal, for two reasons 1. To prevent Nepali + Indian Maoists forming alliance. 2. Nepali Maoists wanted Nepal to become a secural country but certain section in Indian Political establishement wanted Nepal to continue as the only Hindu Kingdom. But then Nepali Maoists, headed by Prachanda, contacted Indian Government. They assured, Support us and we promise not to create any trouble for India. Indian authorities made assessment of the situation in Nepal, and concluded that 1. Most Nepalese people were against Monarchy and King Gyanendra. 2. Maoists had sizable presence in Nepal. 3. If we dont support them, China will. And then we stand to lose. (for example, in future, when Maoist Government is formed, theyll give all contracts to Chinese companies.) 4. If we dont support them, theyll shelter Indian Maoists, further creating trouble for us. 5. So better lets help them get integrated into mainstream politics and democracy of Nepal. Then Nepali Maoists will be of no more trouble to us. Under this assessment, India made a new Foreign Policy for Nepal in 2005. It involved 1. Stop supporting the Monarchy and Nepals Royal family. 2. Befriend the Maoists. 3. Bring Maoists and pro-democracy forces together in Nepal 4. Help establish democracy in Nepal. At the end of this series, well see Why Indias Nepal policy=#EPICFAIL. Anyways, back to the topic, The time is 1996-2006. There is a civil war going on between Royal Nepalese Army vs. Maoists. India and UN try to mediate peace. 2005 The king takes direct control over Government, and dissolves parliament on the ground that popularly PM and parliament has failed curb Maoist menace. 2006 Lot of unrest and agitations by people, against King Gyanendra. (This is dubbed as Second Jan Andolan/Loktantra Andolan). King Gyanendra succumbs to pressure and restores the parliament. Now the (restored) Nepalese Parliament passes a law that 1. King is no longer the supreme commander of Army. (that means. Army will work as per directions of PM and will not take orders of the King. This will facilitate peace deal with Maoists.) 2. Declared Nepal a secular country, (no longer a Hindu Kingdom.) Finally at the end of 2006, Maoists sign a Comprehensive peace accord with Nepal Government, under which
Signing of Peace Agreement between Government (L) and Maoists (R). (Nov.2006) 1. Maoists and Nepalese army will stop operations against each other. Theyll stop new recruitment. 2. Temporary Cantonments will be established. 3. The Maoist combatants will stay in these cantonments. 4. Both the Maoists and the Nepalese army will lock equal amounts of their arms in UN-monitored containers. 5. Government of Nepal will provide food, ration and salary to these Maoist rebels residing in Cantonments. 6. King will no longer enjoy his former political rights. His property will be nationalized. 7. In long term, these Maoist rebels will be either inducted in regular army, or theyll have option to accept financial assistance and lead a regular life. In short, Maoists will stop violence, join mainstream. Ok so far, 1990 Constitution provided for multiparty system. (king appoints PM from the majority party etc.) 1996- 2006 Civil war between Nepalese army vs Maoists. 2006-07 Peace accord. 2007 The interim constitution of 2007. It replaced the previous 1990s Constitution. A Constituent Assembly(CA) was elected as per this interim Constitution. This CA had to draft and deliver the new constitution. (by May 2010) Then a new parliament will be elected as per the new constitution Thus, elections are held under Interim Constitution. And the Maoist party also participates in these elections. But nobody gets absolute majority. This leads to coalition governments. Main Political Parties Party Important persons Maoists 1. Pushpa Kamal Dahal aka Prachanda 2. Baburam Bhattarai 3. Mohan Baidya Kiran UML Madhav Nepal Nepali Congress (NC) Sushil Koirala. Madhesi unimportant Constituent Assembly(CA) Recall how Indian Constitution was made? Nov 1946 Constituent Assembly (CA) was created. (as envisaged in Cabinet Mission Plan). It was made up of elected representatives + nominated members from princely states. December 1946 First meeting of Constituent Assembly (CA). Muslim league boycotts and demands for separate Pakistan. 1947 India becomes an Independent country. Constituent Assembly (CA) becomes a sovereign-body with dual functions 1. Carry out legislative functions (like a parliament.) 2. Draft Constitution of India. (like a Constituent assembly). 1947-1949 The Constitution making process goes on. Lengthy Debates, discussions. Finally Constitution adopted on 26 th November 1949. 1951-52 First General elections held, according to the provision of new Constitution of India. So basically 1. Constituent assembly has to deliver result. (=Constitution). 2. And then fresh elections must be held according to that new Constitution. Now the question is Why is there a political crisis/logjam/turmoil in Nepal? 1. Because their Constituent assembly (CA) has not delivered the result (=Constitution). 2. So President of Nepal has dissolved the Constituent assembly (CA) and removed the Prime Minister. 3. But President also asked the Prime Minister to continue as a caretaker Prime Minister. 4. Problem: This Caretaker Prime minister is not holding fresh elections. Next question: why has Nepal Constituent Assembly failed to deliver result (=Constitution)? Why No Constitution? The Constituent Assembly has failed to deliver a new Constitution for Nepal, because there is severe disagreement among various political parties. #1: Presidential system vs Parliamentary system Maoist Party members We propose that Nepals future executive structure should be like this: President directly elected by people. And hell have the ultimate powers. There will be a Prime minister, elected by members of parliament. But hell just hang around without much powers. This will help, because in present system, no party is getting clear majority, so there is lot of political instability. And coalition Governments usually dont work well. Other parties Oh come on!! It is obvious that youre proposing this to make Prachanda the Dictator of Nepal. We dont agree with this form of governance. We propose the system similar to India= MPs will be elected by people. The leader of majority party will become PM. At the same time, there will be a Ceremonial President with a certain powers. This will be good for democracy because no single organ will have absolute powers. In short we want Parliamentary system of governance. Maoist Party Ya if Parliamentary system provides for effective checks and balances then what about Indira Gandhis rule during 70s and the emergency?? How was that not a dictatorship? We dont accept this stupid proposal. Everybody starts shouting. Speaker Beth Jaayiye, Beth Jaayiye. Kripyaa Shaant Ho Jaayiye. (sit down, sit down, please calm down.) So, first disagreement is what should be the form of government. #2: Federation on Ethnic lines Maoist and Madhesi Parties We want Nepal to be subdivided into provinces. These provinces/states should be drawn based on ethnic lines. E.g. separate state for Madhesi people in areas where theyve majority. And so on Other parties(Nepali Congress(NC), UML) We dont agree with this. Over the years, there has been lot of internal migration in Nepal. Similarly, there are marriages between many castes, so the social-demography is changing. In this light, separate states based on ethnicity/caste = not good for unity of Nepal. Besides, our vote bank consists of upper caste Hindus (Brahman, Chhetri etc.) and theyre opposed to this system since they dont have clear majority in any area. Everybody starts shouting. (again) Speaker Beth Jaayiye, Beth Jaayiye. Kripyaa Shaant Ho Jaayiye. (sit down, sit down, please calm down.) So, second disagreement is Basis of Federation. There are other disagreements over appointment of judges, whether judiciary should be completely autonomous or responsible to legislature, election process etc. Over the years, they have not been able to sort out these differences in the Constituent assembly (CA). Taarikh pe Taarikh Constituent assembly (CA) was formed in 2008. Original term: they were to deliver Constitution by May 2010. They Failed to deliver Constitution due to ^above disagreements. The term extended to August 2011. Again failed to deliver Constitution. The term extended to November 2011. Again failed to deliver Constitution. Term extended to May 2012. Now Supreme Court got angry, and passed the order whether CA delivers a Constitution or not, it must be dissolved in May 2012. Ok wait, lets recap 1990 New Constitution that provided for multiparty system. (king appoints PM from the majority party etc.) 1996- 2006 Civil war between Nepalese army vs Maoists. 2006- 07 Peace accord. 2007 The interim constitution of 2007. It replaced the previous 1990s Constitution. Election of Constituent Assembly.(CA) This to be elected would draft and deliver the new constitution, and a new parliament would be elected as recommended by the new constitution 2008- 2012 CA fails to deliver Constitution. It keeps giving itself extension after extension. In the meantime, Prime Minister is changed four times during 2008 to 2011! How and why?
Pushpa Kamals Prachand Dhamaal Prachanda is the chief of Maoist party. (Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) (CPN).) His original aim: overthrow the State by violent means. (a.k.a. the traditional Maoist way, just like how Indian Maoists want to overthrow the State by 2050.) He waged Civil war between 1996-2006. Ultimately He had to sign peace accord and agree to join democracy. In 2008s election, his party won many seats. He became the Prime Minister of Nepal. Ram Baran Yadav of Nepali Congress (NC) became the President. Since Prachanda couldnt overthrow the state via traditional Maoist methods (=violence), He decided to go forplan B. Prachandas Plan B? 1. Initially 6500 of the Ex-Maoist Combatants were to be recruited in Army. 2. Prachanda raised the demand to induct 9000 Maoist combatants in the army. 3. ^This will led to significant presence of Maoist in the regular army=> army cannot create much trouble in future. (say for example, if US or India supported King to return and there was another political crisis). 4. Prachandas Maoist party will push for a new Constitution that has directly elected President. (so no worries of coalition politics.) 5. Similarly they demanded Judiciary must be accountable to legislature (and not autonomous like it is in India.) So ultimately Prachandas aim was to have a governance system where he could be the main boss and other organs of the State (army, judiciary, legislature) remain weak, just like President Hugo Chaves in Venezuela or Putin in Russia. But Prachandas otherwise awesome plan was cut short in 2009. Why? Because in 2009, Prachanda decided to replace the Army chief. So Prime Minister Prachanda asked President Ram Baran Yadav to sign the order for removal of Army Chief. Problem: President Ram Baran Yadav refused to sign the letter. (reports say India had put pressure on him, not to replace the army chief.) Result: 1. Prachanda bites the dust. He resigns from Prime ministers post because President did not agree to his demand for removal of Army Chief. 2. Madhav Nepal of UML party becomes the new Prime Minister of Nepal. Madhav Nepals lack of Dhamaal From 2009-11, Madhav Nepal is the Prime minister of Nepal. But Prachanda did not like that he had to give up the PM post. So he starts agitations, Bandh, protests, rioting, dharnaa, pradarshan against Madhav Nepal.
Anti Madhav rally: Maoist supporters (Prachandas Party) Demanding resignation of PM Madhav Nepal Madhav Nepal resigns without doing much Dhamaal. Now Jhala Nath Khanal becomes new PM, but he too is no match for Prachandas Dhamaal and resigns in August 2011. Finally Baburam Bhattarai (of Prachandas own Maoist party) becomes new Prime Minister. And Baburam continues to be the Prime minister of Nepal ever since then.
[Diplomacy] Nepal Logjam (Part 2 of 3): Merger of Maoists with Army, Anti-India Campaign, Why Elections are not held
1. Introduction 2. Rehab of Maoist Combatants 3. Problem areas in Maoist Army merger 4. Maoist MNREGA scam 5. Trouble in Cantonment 6. Power struggle within Maoist Party 7. Kirans makes new Party 8. Against Prachanda 9. Against Baburam Bhattarai 10. Peoples Constitution 11. Against India 12. Anti-India stand of Maoists 13. Babu vs Prachanda @RIO+20 14. Crisis: May 2012 15. Why Election not held? 16. Baburams next move Introduction Nepal logjam is a three part article series. Make sure youve read previous parts, before proceeding further. Part Topics Link 1 of 3 Indias Nepal Policy (2005) Why CA cant deliver a new Constitution for Nepal. Why four Prime ministers have changed in Nepal between 2008 to 2011. Click ME 3 of 3 Chinese presence in Nepal how and why Indias Nepal Policy (2005)=#epicfail. Click Me Rehab of Maoist Combatants After the ceasefire and peace accord, around 20,000 Maoist combatants had been living in the temporary Cantonments. (many of them are child-soldiers). they have deposited their weapons to UN-supervised containers. 6500 of them were to be absorbed in army. (disregarding educational/age requirements). Rest of the Maoist combatants were promised a financial package of 5 to 8 lakh Nepali rupees, each. So they can go back to their village/families and start their lives again with business, farming whatever. But then Prachanda and Baburam started demading, we want 9000 Maoist combatants to be inducted in army. The Army was against this move, fearing such large influx of Maoists inside army, will break its politically neutral character. (+most of them were not meeting the have the age/educational/physical std. criteria.)
Nepali Maoists in UN Cantonment (Photo: Mikel Dunham) Problem areas in Maoist Army merger While Prachanda demands 9000 Maoists to be recruited in Army but the Ground reality= barely 3000 Maoist rebels actually wanted to join the army. Rest of them are uncomfortable working with their former enemy (army), with whom they had fought for more than 10 years. Most of them are tired of the revolution, they prefer to accept cash, go back home, enjoy family life. Most of them are not comfortable with the rigorous training and discipline of regular army. Some of the senior Maoist rebels, want to be absorbed as Colonel, Brigadier and other higher posts. But in most cases, Army is reluctant to give them such higher ranks, given their old age and low education. At the end of 2012, barely 1500 Maoists joined the army. Others accepted ca$h, deposited weapons and left for home. Maoist MNREGA scam In the Indian villages, Sarpanch and Patwaari create fake-job cards and withdraw MNREGA money. In Nepal, the Maoists had submitted their weapons to UN- Containers and they were living in temporary cantonments. They were given food, ration and salary according to their ranks. (This money was from aid given by UN, EU, Germany etc. donors). Problem: Many of the Maoists left the camp. Yet money is withdrawn in their name. Similarly fake id cards were created and money was siphoned off in ghost accounts. The CAG of Nepal says total 1.5 billion Nepali rupees have been paid to fake combatants as monthly salary and food allowance by the Government! Prachanda and his favored Maoist commanders are running this Maoist-MNREGAscam. Prachanda has made truckload of cash out of this game, bought expensive watches, , race-horses, SUV cars, luxury apartments, iphone5 etc.etc.etc. This has created deep resentment and internal fighting among the Maoist rank and file. Trouble in Cantonment In several camps, the Maoist combatants started rioting, saying that Pro-Prachanda commanders are making truckload of cash through fake-ID cards (Maoist-MNREGAscam.). Prime Minister Bhattarai (of Maoist party) had to call in army to stop these riots. These has further increased the bitterness among Maoist-cadres, because Bhattarai called up their old enemy (army) for help! After this incident, Prachanda had to install metal-detectors at his home, because those angry rebels planning to attack him! Power struggle within Maoist Party The hierarchy of Maoist party is like this: 1. Prachanda @Top. 2. Mohan Baidya Kiran + Baburam Bhattarai (Present Prime Minister) as second in line.
Babu is like our Mohan. He doesnt have many supporters in the party. (or perhaps thats the reason Prachanda made him PM!) Kiran on the other hand, has sizable following in the Maoist-party. Both hate eachother. Mohan Baidya Kiran Youve made Bhattarai the Prime minister . He is making truckload of ca$h, I hate him. Prachanda Ya but he is more acceptable to international players, including India and USA. So let him stay there for a while. Baidya Whatever dude. Just tell me whats your next plan. Prachanda Well, I want new Constitution to have powerful President directly elected by people. So that I can become the Main Boss of Nepal. Bhattarai is only there to keep the seat warm for me. Problem is other political parties are not in favor of Presidential system of government! Kiran Dude, those parties never support you to establish this Presidential system! So, I suggest we leave this Constituent assembly and again start violent agitation just like the good ol Maoist! Ill fully support you in that. Only one condition : get rid of Baburam Bhattarai. Because I hate that guy. Prachanda Sorry bro, not possible. If we start violent struggle again, well lose support of India and the international community. Besides, most of our Maoist brethren in Cantonments have accepted ca$h, deposited their weapons and left for their homes. Itll be hard to mobilize people again for a new round of armed struggle. Kiran Then you leave me no choice. Ill make my own new party. Adios suckers. Kirans makes new Party Many of Maoist cadres and mid-level leaders, are also disillusioned with Prachanda and Baburam, particularly because they are making truckload of cash via corruption (including Maoist MNREGA). So, when Kiran left the party, around 1/3 rd of cadres from Prachandas original Maoist party also joined Kirans party.
Kiran-faction splits from Prachandas Party (Photo Mikel Dunham) Now Kirans stand is following: Against Prachanda Prachanda and Bhattarai are Red Traitors.(Gaddaar) Prachanda is swindling billions of rupees meant for combatants in different cantonments. (=Maoist MNREGA scam) Against Baburam Bhattarai Babu has sold our country to India by signing the Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPPA) agreement. Babu has given contract of upgrading Nepalese airports, to an Indian company without inviting bids. Only the Army, judiciary and police are legitimate state apparatus. I dont recognise the legitimacy of the President Ram Baran Yadav or Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai. Peoples Constitution Prachanda and Babu are responsible for not delivering Peoples Constitution. President Ram Baran Yadav only consults the big four political parties. He doesnt listen to the small parties concerns. We want an all sides-round table conference to decide the future of Nepal and draft Constitution for Nepal. Well not mind going back to the armed struggle, if ^this is not done. Against India Kiran has also launched anti-India campaign. He says India wants to colonise our small country Nepal. Both Prachanda and Babu are puppets in the hands of Indian Government. Nepals relations with India must be based on equality, regarding border-disputes, trade and transit rights. India is trying to culturally invade Nepal via Hindi films and songs. Therefore, we are banning Hindi films in cinema halls and Hindi songs played on FM radio, Well prevent vehicles with Indian number plates, including goods carriers, from entering Nepal. Anti-India stand of Maoists Please note: Whatever Kiran is saying against India= Nothing new. During civil war (1996-2006), Prachanda had also said similar Anti- India things. But India helped him broker peace with Government, so he toned down his opposition. When Kiran again started agitating against India (ban on Indian films, songs, vehicles), the Nepalese Government (headed by Maoist PM Baburam Bhattarai), ordered the police to take strict action against these rowdy elements. Experts believe that Kiran is intentionally doing this Anti-India campaign, with following objectives in his mind 1. India contacts him, pays him some cash to keep his mouth shut OR 2. India helps him get a plump ministerial position in Baburams cabinet OR directly makes Kiran the PM. 3. India starts looking @Kiran as the permanent-alternative to Prachanda/Baburam. Then India will start showering money and support to him, just like President Obama does to Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan. Babu vs Prachanda @RIO+20 Recall that Kiran left the party because Prachanda did not remove Babu from PMs post. But that doesnt mean Babu and Prachanda are best friends like Jai and Veeru. Most of the time, Babu doesnt do as directed by Prachanda. (Unlike our PM to Madam-ji.) For example in July 2012, RIO+20 summit was held. (we have already covered that Summit, click me) Prachanda had ordered Baburam not to attend this RIO+20 summit. Still Baburam went to the summit. Why? Because Baburam wanted to meet Indian PM+ Chinese Premier and secure their support, saying Im in charge of Nepal. No need to talk with other players. Ill get whatever you want. But please dont support others (including Prachanda lolz!) Crisis: May 2012 So far: The Constituent Assembly of Nepal, is unable to deliver a new Constitution. Because there is severe difference between Maoist party and other parties. Right now Baburam Bhattarai of Maoist Party is the Prime Minister. And Supreme Court had ordered that Constituent Assembly will be dissolved in May 2012. (=Baburam will cease to be Prime minister and new election must be held.) But Baburam Bhattarai plays a new trick: He passes a resolution to extend Constituent Assemblys life by 3 more months. This goes against the order of Supreme Court. So, President Ram Baran Yadav starts taking legal opinion on what to do next. The legal-experts advice him to remove this Baburam Bhattarai and call for new elections. Finally President Ram Baran Yadav removed Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai from his post, but asked him to continue as a caretaker till an alternative arrangement is made. Why Election not held? So far, 1. 2008 Elections were held for CA. 2. CA had to deliver Constitution.(by 2010) 3. But it did not deliver result. 4. May 2012: President Ram Baran Yadav dissolves the CA, as per Supreme Court order. 5. President also removes Baburam as PM, but asks him to continue as caretaker prime minister, until new arrangements are made. Baburam to public Ill work as the caretaker PM.Well hold general elections on November 2012 for new CA.Then Ill handover powers to newly elected PM. Election Commission(EC) But hows that possible? 1. First problem: The interim constitution of 2007 doesnt have any provision for repeat elections! 2. Second problem: all of the Election Commissioners are retiring in October 2012. And new election Commissioners cannot be appointed without approval of Full-fledged PM+Opposition leader+Speaker+Chief Justice. Baburam Whats your point? EC Youre not a Full PM, your just a caretaker PM. Baburam SO? EC So, you cannot appoint new Election Commissioners, because you are just a caretaker Prime minister! It means after October 2012, there will be no election Commissioners, then how are you going to hold elections in November 2012?? Baburam Oh well, then Im the luckiest guy alive! Ill continue being caretaker PM forever! And though there is no parliament in session. I will continue ruling over this country via ordinances. President Ram Baran Yadav Damn it. This is ridiculous!Now I ask the political parties to elect a new PM through consensus within a week.(November 2012) Baburam Lolz well see. The political parties, fail to reach consensus. So Baburam continues being a caretaker PM. President Ram Baran Yadav extends the deadline. Makes a trip to New Delhi. (December 2012) But India didnt give any open support. So he returns empty handed. Now caretaker Prime Minister Baburam says well hold election somewhere in April-May 2013! In the meantime, he is behaving like a full-fledged Prime minister, and has been taking major decisions on hydel projects, foreign investment and promotions of security officials, besides loaning private companies huge sums of money from national deposit schemes. Bhattarai feels the absence of a parliament grants him immunity from wider scrutiny and accountability. Baburams next move So far: CA failed to deliver result. President dissolved CA, removed Baburam as PM but asked him to continue as a caretaker PM. Baburam promised to hold elections in Nov 2012. But elections are not held in November 2012. Baburam and Prachanda (Maoist party) are trying to gather support of other political party by saying following things: 1. Since weve failed to deliver result (Constitution), the UN, India etc. wont trust us much. And if King Gyanendra tries to make some move, who knows, India might even support him! 2. So, if you dont support us, then King Gyanendra and monarchy will return. And hell take the whole pie by himself. Weve an enemy in common (King) so support us. 3. Nepals public is angry with every political party. So, even if there is election, nobody is going to get clear majority. So why waste truckload of cash in election campaigns? So, Instead of that, lets do following We pass a new resolution to revive the existing Constituent Assembly. To hell with President, if he opposes, well remove him by passing another resolution! On the other hand, Nepali Congress (NC) party, is also working to make a second front. What theyve in mind is something like: get support of non-leftist forces, Army, upper caste organizations, accept ceremonial monarchy, and get Sushil Koirala elected as Prime Minister. [Diplomacy] Nepal Logjam (Part 3 of 3): Chinese presence, Anti-India sentiments, how & why Indias policy failed
1. Introduction 2. Chinese Influence 3. USA 4. Murderers are free 5. Human rights are selective 6. Corruption 7. Reservation in Army Jobs 8. Ethnic Unrest 9. Anger against UN and International Community 10. Land transfer 11. The Priest Appointment 12. Why Anti-India sentiment in Nepal? 13. Regressive forces 14. Change of Indias Stand 15. Criticism of Indias Nepal Policy Introduction Chinese Influence However in the late 80s, King of Nepal decided to buy weapons from China. India responded by putting trade-embargo on Nepal. This completely paralyzed the Nepalese economy. Thus, Royal+Political establishment in Nepal learned the lesson ki India se pangaa =bahut mahengaa.(If we annoy India, itll be very costly for us!) So, the Nepal King cancelled weapons deal with China and maintained a bit of distance from Chinese authorities. But ever since the abolition of Monarchy, China is building strong relations with Nepal. Lumbini Special Development Zone Lumbini, about 50 km from Indias border. It is a pilgrim place for Buddhists and Hindus. Asia Pacific Exchange and Cooperation Foundation (APECF)= NGO backed by Chinese Government. APECF has signed deal with Nepalese Government to Development this area. (Project worth $3 billion.) This has upset India, because we wanted to develop this tourist city on our own. Infrastructure China is upgrading an existing airport in the tourist city of Pokhara China is building four major roads along the Nepal-Tibet border and four dry ports for Nepal. Defense China is setting up a training academy for the Armed Police Force, China gives annual financial assistance to Nepalese paramilitary forces and the Civil Police. Cash China has given billions of Nepali rupees as soft loan. Tibet Nepals stand on Tibet = We recognize Tibet as Chinas integral part. (One China policy) When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao visited Nepal, the Baburams Government made elaborate arrangements to make sure no Free- Tibet activist ruined the visit. USA 2003 USA banned the Nepali Maoist party as a terrorist organization. September 2012 US has taken their name off the list of terrorist organizations. This is seen as a move to become friendly with the Nepalese Government (presently headed by Maoist party) and prevent absolute domination of either China or India in this country. Anyways, back to the point: Murderers are free Supreme Court of Nepal, convicted a Maoist MP for murder. But since he belongs to PM Baburam Bhattarais party, the Government isnot doing anything. In fact Prime Minister asked the President to pardon that fellow! The Speaker of Nepalese Lok Sabha did not disqualify the said Murderer MP even after court-conviction. This has eroded Bhattarais image in local crowd + among international players.(UN, India etc.) Human rights are selective Amnesty International and other human rights groups say that Nepals Government (led by Maoists) is not prosecuting their own leaders for genocide and crimes against humanity. PM Bhattarai has unilaterally withdrawn human rights violation cases, including those of murder and abductions, against his party leaders and cadre. It seems the international community has chosen to shut its eyes to the atrocities committed by the Maoists, in the name of getting politically stable Nepal. On the other hand, some Nepalese Army officials are being prosecuted for Human rights violation during civil war. This is creating bitterness between Army and Government. UN Mission to Nepal (UNMIN) To assist the peace process To manage the arms and armies of the Maoist party (after they joined democratic process in 2006) 2010: UNMIN left Nepal. UNMIN has been accused of being Pro-Maoist, when it came to handling human rights violation. Corruption (2011) Nepals ranks around 150 in the Transparency International, so you get the idea of how things roll in Nepal. The officers from Irrigation department complained to Prime minister that Irrigation minister doesnt pass any project unless bribes are paid to him in advance. Similarly bureaucrats from almost every department have openly alleged that ministers demand huge bribes for transfers, promotions and plum postings. Elections to local bodies have not been conducted in the past decade. Asian Development Bank and the World Bank reports show heavy corruption in poverty removal programs done at national and local levels. Reservation in Army Jobs One of the Coalition partners of Maoist Government = the United Democratic Madhesi Front (UDMF) aka Madhesi party. Madhesi party @Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai, provide for reservation of 3,000 posts in Army for Madhesis and create a separate regiment for them, else well pull off support from this coalition. Babu Ok ok, I agree. Army Chief But I wont agree. The Nepal army will recruit anyone fulfilling the prescribed eligibility criteria. We have never discriminated against anyone in the past. Babu Ok ok. I back off. So, ultimately this move did not materialize but it angered the other Hindu castes (Brahman, Chhetri etc.). Ethnic Unrest Maoist party wants to divide Nepal on Ethnic lines. (besides, their coalition partner Madesi party is blackmailing them to create separate province for Madesi people.) But other Hindu castes are against this move. Particularly Brahman and Chhetris (=30% per cent of the total population). So they also started bandh and agitations. They donot want provinces to be created on ethnicity. Such Bandh and agitations have badly affected tourism and income of people. Anger against UN and International Community UN, Swiss and Norwegian Government had given money to certain Nepali NGOs and Organizations that claimed to work for poverty removal. But ground reality, all the money was only used for particular castes and groups. This has further annoyed the Upper caste organizations. They started agitating against UN and other donor agencies. Finally UN representatives gave statement We had given money only for poverty alleviation. If that money has been used for promoting caste and ethnic hatred, we regret it. Land transfer During the Civil War (1996-2006), the Maoists held their Kangaroo courts and took away land from rich farmers in rural areas and distributed it among their own cadres. Under the Peace accord, such land was to be returned to original owners. But Prime Minister Bhattarai (of Maoist party) has instructed the revenue department to legalize such land transfers= Maoist cadres will continue possessing the land. This is brewing more tension among villagers. The Priest Appointment According to age old tradition, only Indian Brahmin were appointed as head priest in Kathmandus Pashupatinath temple. But when Prachanda became Prime minister, he appointed a Nepali Brahmin as the head priest of the temple. This led to massive protests by the Hindu community in Nepal. 2012: Nepal Government makes a new law to restore appointment process. (=only Dravid Shaivite Brahman community from the Trilinga* area of India can become Bhatt/Priest in that temple. *Trilinga= a territory that comprises parts of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu Why Anti-India sentiment in Nepal? In the above points, you saw how and why common Nepalese people are unhappy with the things. The rule of Maoist Government has brought nothing but corruption, ethnic tension, economic problems. Many Nepalese people have started thinking, This Maoist led Government is bad and India has supported them to power.= India is the bad guy. (Just like how common Afghan people would feel against America, for supporting that corrupt Karzai regime.) On the other hand, the regressive forces in Nepal, also hate India for not supporting Former king Gyanendra and the Monarchy, during and after the civil war. Regressive forces Recall that Maoists did not return the land to the original owners. So there is bitterness in certain population sections of villages.(rich, well-to-do farmers etc.) Similarly the demand of ethnic states for Madhesi etc. are not acceptable to other Hindu castes (Brahman, Chhetri etc.) 2012: The former king Gyanendra starts making visits to various districts of Nepal. Large number of people greet him. There is lot of slogan shouting in his favor. Thousands of people come to see him and hear his speeches. It proves that many people are still in favor of the old traditional monarchy. (unlike Indian calculation that lead to change of Nepal policy in 2005.) And this section of Nepalese want the things to return to old system. These forces are labelled as Regressive forces (Regressive=returning to a former less advanced state.) Right now theyre fragmented, (dont have a special political party to champion their cause.) But who knows, in long term, King and or his family or someone else might start political party. This is making Prachanda and the Maoist party bit nervous. Because public who initially supported them are now disillusioned. Until now, Prachanda used to run propaganda that Royal family has stashed truckload of cash in Swiss bank accounts. But recently the Swiss authorities told that Royal family of Nepal had no account in any Swiss bank. This has further emboldened the regressive forces. So Prachanda is trying scare-tactics in his speeches to woo his traditional vote-bank, look if you dont support us. These regressive forces will come back and make your life hell like. Change of Indias Stand Recently, Indias External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshids said, India has no particular likes or dislikes for any force in Nepal. Meaning well work with anyone in Nepal as long as it serves our national-interest. (it proves that We want to correct our earlier mistake of supporting the Maoists.) This statement of Khurshid has made Prachanda and Baburam really nervous. They fear India might play some dirty-trick behind the scene, and support these regressive forces/King/Nepali Congress(NC) etc. or even worst: support Kiran, who totally hates both of them! Criticism of Indias Nepal Policy 1. Under Maoist regime in Nepal, Chinese presence has increased. (compared to previous Monarchy). 2. India gained an ally (Nepali Maoists) but India lost goodwill of Common Nepalese people.+ Plus there is new guy to deal with: Kiran and his anti-India campaign. Ofcourse, in politics and diplomacy you cannot keep everyone happy. But 1. Prachandas control over Maoist party has declined. (Recall how Kiran left his party with almost 1/3 of the cadres.) 2. Many of the remaining Maoist cadres and smalltime party leaders are unhappy with Prachanda and Baburams corruption and lavish lifestyle. 3. Most of the Maoists combatants have deposited their weapons to army, accepted cash and left for their villages. This means: 1. Prachanda doesnt have the political clout like before. 2. Prachanda doesnt have the power of violence anymore. (He cannot start another civil war now. Weapons deposited, Maoists combatants left for home.) The romance period with Maoism is over. Public is angry and unhappy. In next election, Maoist partys seats will decline. Even Baburam and Prachanda dont have much friendship with eachother= in future, there may be even more splits in the Maoist party. So in the coming days, Prachanda will not be the dominant figure in Nepal. This means, he will not be of much use to either India or China. So, ultimately India wasted time and money supporting the wrong team for 6 years. In return we got bad publicity among Nepalese people that we (Indians) are responsible for their crisis: both financial and political. And now India will have to repeat making friends exercise with whoever becomes the new king maker in Nepal. Therefore, when President Ram Baran Yadav visited India in December 2012, Indian establishment did not offer him any open support. Right now we are in wait n watch mode to see who emerges as the main player.
This concludes second part in the series. In the third and the last article, well see:
[Polity] Juvenile Justice Act: features, Controversy post Delhi-Gangrape, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR)
1. What is Juvenile Justice Act 2000? o Features of Juvenile Justice Act o Special Juvenile Police Unit 2. Why in News/Controversy? 3. Pro arguments (= reform needed) o Juvenile Justice in other countries United Kingdom United States of America Australia o PIL in Delhi Highcourt 4. Anti-arguments (no reform needed) 5. Reforms initiated 1. UP 2. Kerala 6. National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) 7. Functions of NCPCR? 8. Constitutional Provisions 9. UN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD 10. Mock questions What is Juvenile Justice Act 2000? In India, we have accepted the policy of no imprisonment for children for any offence. The Juvenile Justce Act of 2000 is the tool to implement that policy. The Crimes committed by those under the age of 18, fall under this act. Applicable across India (minus Jammu and Kashmir). Full name: Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children )Act, 2000 (JJA) JJ Act deals with two categories of children
Child in need of care and protection Juvenile in conflict with law Who? Children found in difficult circumstances and are in danger of survival and growth.For example rescued from a brothel, illegal factory etc. Children involved in crime. Authority Child Welfare Committee. Juvenile Justice Board. Under JJ act, ^each category of children are kept in separate care- houses. Child himself can appear before the Competent Authority and demand his/her rights. Features of Juvenile Justice Act 1. Juvenile cannot be kept in police lock-up or jail. 2. Juveniles cannot be treated or sentenced in the same manner as the adult criminals. 3. Cases involving juveniles are tried by juvenile Justice board and not by regular courts. 4. Juvenile Justice board consists of magistrate and two social workers. 5. The case is decided by majority. 6. If a Juvenile criminal is convicted, at maximum he gets three years in a reform facility. Thereafter he must be released on probation. 7. Juvenile can only be kept at the special home till he attains 18 years of age. 8. Capital punishment (hanging) or life imprisonment cannot be imposed on a Juvenile offender, irrespective of the gravity of the crime. Special Juvenile Police Unit JJ Act has provision for setting up such unit in every police station. Police office of ASI or above rank shall work as as Child Welfare Officer. He shall be assisted by two local NGOs. These units are supposed to identify the children who are vulnerable to engaging in criminal behavior, and extend help to them. But in most of the districts in India, such police units are either not formed, or theyre non-functional. Why in News/Controversy? One of the rapist in Delhi case, claims to be a Juvenile. Delhi police will file a separate charge sheet against him in a juvenile court. Even if he is convicted, hell get maximum 3 years stay in a Juvenile reform facility. Once he attains majority (18+), he cannot be kept with minor convicts at Juvenile reform facility AND he can he be sent to jail with adult convicts. So hell be released. This so called juvenile accused, had beat that Delhi gangrape- victim with an iron rod mercilessly. Yet the law calls him a juvenile and hell be released with very light punishment. Therefore, people are angry. Reforms Sought The age limit should be lowered for juvenile criminals. In case of heinous crimes such as rape and murder, the Juvenile criminals should be tried just like adult criminals. Pro arguments (= reform needed) The National Crime Records (2011) speaks for itself Crime Juveniles (boys under 18) caught approx. numbers Rape 1200 Murder 1100 Kidnapping 500 Burglary 500 3 years very low The JJ Act provides that a Juvenile Criminal be placed in a reform facility for maximum 3 years. But there is no logical or scientific reason which shows that a juvenile will be reformed within three years. In the case of the Delhi rapist, there is no assurance he will be reformed in three years and will not pose a threat to society for the rest of his life once released. Juvenile Justice in other countries United Kingdom Here, the age of criminal responsibility, is set at 10 years. Means any individual above the age of 10 is considered fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. In case of a juvenile offender, he can either be tried as a juvenile or as an adult, depending on the heinousness of the crime. United States of America Same as UK= if the crime was heinous (rape, murder etc.), the juvenile offenders are tried as adults. Australia Any individual over 14 years of age is held accountable of any crime committed by him. whether the individual is to be tried as a minor or an adult depends again on the heinousness of the crime. India In India, were giving blanket protection to everyone less than 18 years old. Hell, Juveniles are exempt even from special laws such as POTA, National Security Act etc. India too should move towards a Juvenile Justice system with differential penal provisions. (=if a juvenile has Committed any heinous crime, he must be tried and punished just like a regular adult criminal.) PIL in Delhi Highcourt This PIL seeks Delhi Highcourt to declare some provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act as ultra vires. Because recent incidents show that juveniles, who have attained the age of 16 years, are involved in serious crimes. Such Juveniles are quite well developed and they do not need the care and protection of the society. Rather the society needs care and protection against them. A person committing a serious crime after attaining the age of 17 years and 364 days cannot be treated differently from the person who commits the same crime after attaining the age of 18 years and one day. Anti-arguments (no reform needed) The age limit for juvenile justice should not be reduced because Most of these children grow up in an environment where they are neglected or face mental, physical or sexual abuse themselves. These happen because most of the children belong to the poorest of the poor sections of society and grow up watching violence and abuse in their families and neighbourhoods. Throwing them in a jail will not help in their rehabilitation. Main reason for juvenile crime is the failure to protect vulnerable children from falling under the influence of drugs or in the wrong company of adults. Delhi alone has around 80,000 children on its streets. When children are living on the streets or in pitiable conditions, they can easily come under the influence of criminal-minded adults. Juvenile Criminals have not increased The rate of crime by children (that is, the number of children committing offences per lakh of the population) has not seen a substantial increase in the last decade It has gone from 0.9 in 2000 to 2.1 in 2011. Hence, the demand to lower the age of juvenility is not supported by crime data relating to children in India. Similarly India has seen very low Juvenile crime compared to Development countries such as USA. Country Juveniles arrested (2011) USA More than 11 lakhs India Around 34,000. Awarding death penalty to a Juvenile will be barbarous in a civilized society. A juvenile should not be imprisoned for life, without parole. Because it would place an unnecessary burden on the taxpayer. If a Juvenile is sentenced for long-term prison, he might get into company of hardcore criminals and come out as a member of organized crime rather than reformed and responsible citizens. It is the certainty rather than the severity of punishment that deters. Reforms initiated UP The Uttar Pradesh government has put forward a proposal that in the case of rape, only those under the age of 16 be treated as juveniles. (=age limit reduced). Kerala Kerala state Government has decide to amendment to the Kerala Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules The Social welfare department officials have also suggested that of juvenile justice rules need not apply in gruesome crimes such as the Delhi gang rape and such juvenile offenders be treated like adult criminals. National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) It is a statutory body. (not Constitutional body like CAG or EC) Act passed 2005 But Commission actually set up in 2007 Functions of NCPCR? Review national laws, policies regarding Child rights. Recommend measures to Government for their effective implementation. Present annual reports to central Government. Examine all factors affecting child-rights and suggest steps to Government Look into matters relating to 1. Terrorism 2. Communal Violence 3. Riots 4. Natural Disasters 5. Domestic Violence 6. HIV AIDS 7. Trafficking 8. Maltreatment 9. Torture And Exploitation 10. Pornography 1. Children in distress, 2. Marginalised and disadvantaged children, 3. Children in conflict with law (juveniles offenders) 4. Children without family 5. Children of prisoners. Other functions 1. Study international treaties and their implementation in India. 2. promote research in the field of child rights 3. Spread child rights literacy 4. promote awareness 5. through publications, media, seminars and other available means 6. Inspect juvenile custodial homse 7. Inquire into violation of child rights and recommend initiation of proceedings in such cases 8. Can Receive Complaints. (any language under 8 th schedule, no fees). 9. Can take sup moto notice for child rights cases. 10. Enjoys powers of a civil court. (can summon documents, persons, witnesses etc.) 11. Can recommend Government to provide interim relief to the victim/his family. 12. Can approach the Supreme Court or the High Court and request them to issue orders or writs. 13. Can recommend Government to initiate prosecution against child rights violators. Constitutional Provisions 15/3 State to make special provisions for women and children. 21A Right to education 23 Human trafficking and forced labour 24 Child labour 39 Healthy Development of children 45 Early childhood care +education 47 State to raise level of nutrition and standard of living UN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD According to UN definition, Children=all under Age of 18. Category Provisions Survival 1. The child shall be entitled from his birth to a name and a nationality. 2. Enjoy the benefits of social security. 3. Adequate pre-natal and post-natal care. 4. Adequate nutrition, housing, recreation and medical services. 5. Child shall not be separated from his mother, unless exceptional circumstances. 6. Child shall be among the first to receive protection and relief, in all circumstances and disasters. Protection 7. State shall provide special treatment for physically, mentally or socially handicapped children. 8. Society and the public authorities shall provide special care to children without a family or means of support. 9. Shall not be the subject of traffic, in any form. 10. Protected against all forms of neglect, cruelty and exploitation Development 11. Shall not be employed before an appropriate minimum age. 12. Free and compulsory education, at least in the elementary stages. 13. Full opportunity for play and recreation. ^list not exhaustive, just listing the fodder-worthy points for essay/interview. Mock questions Q1. Which of the following is/are correct about Juvenile Justice Act 1. It only deals with the children accused a crime. 2. It is not applicable in case of special acts such as POTA (repealed) or National Security Act etc. 3. In case of heinous crimes, it allows the judiciary to treat juveniles as adult criminals. Ans a. Only 1 and 2 b. Only 1 and 3 c. Only 2 and 3 d. None. Q2. Which of the following is outside the jurisdiction of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR)? 1. Take suo moto notice of cases related to child rights. 2. Sentence jail term to persons involved in child-abuse. Ans. a. Only 1 b. Only 2 c. Both d. none Q3. Correct Match Article Related with 1. 21A, 45 Child education 2. 23 Forced labour 3. 24 child labour a. Only 1 and 2 b. Only 1 and 3 c. Only 2 and 3 d. All Q4. Who among following enjoys to the powers to legislate on matters related to Prison, reformatories, borstal* institutions and other such institutions? a. State b. Union c. Both (concurrent) *Borstal= Formerly a British reform school for youths considered too young to send to prison. Descriptive Each for 12 marks (120 words) 1. What are the salient Features of Juvenile Justice Act 2000 (12m) 2. Examine the need for reforms in Juvenile Justice Act. 3. List the functions of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) 4. Discuss the Initiatives taken by Government for protection of Child Rights. Essay 1. In serving the best interests of children, we serve the best interests of all humanity. 2. If we are ever to have real peace in this world we shall have to begin with the children. 3. Justice and peace can only thrive together, never apart. 4. A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity. 5. Silence in the face of injustice is complicity with the oppressor. 6. An act of justice closes the book on a misdeed; an act of vengeance writes one of its own. Interview 1. What are the responsibilities of a district collector regarding protection of child rights? 2. Are you in favor of reducing age limit of Juvenile criminals? Yes/no why