GR L-5 Facts: The petitioner iled a case a!ainst the respondent durin! the militar" occupation o #apan$ %ubse&uentl" the 'hilippines (as liberated b" the )mericans. The respondent #ud!e reuses to continue the proceedin!s contendin! that the statement o Gen. *c)rthur in behal o the Government o the +%) has the eect o nulli"in! all #udicial proceedin!s. ,ssue: -hether or not the act and proceedin!s o the de acto !overnment remains valid. .eld: /es$ the doctrine in international la( is that all acts and proceedin!s o the de acto !overnment (hich are not o political comple0ion remains valid. )lso the declaration o Gen. *c)rthur should be construed to onl" appl" to act and proceedin! o political comple0ion$ because to construe other(ise (ould violate the .a!ue Re!ulations1 (hich prohibits the belli!erent occupant rom nulli"in! or settin! aside the #ud!ments rendered b" courts in their liti!ation durin! the period o occupation. .o(ever several #ustices dissent rom the ma#orit"$ contendin! that the petition has no merit since the 2ctober 'roclamation does not violate an" principle o international la(1 and that said proclamation (as ree rom ambi!uit" (hen Gen. *c )rthur stated all la(s$ re!ulations and processes are void. Thus the %upreme Court has no ri!ht to attribute Gen. *ac)rthur an intention dierent rom (hat he has plainl"$ clearl"$ unmistakabl" e0pressed in unambi!uous (ords (ith amiliar meanin! !enerall" understood b" the common man.