The history writing by the British was a deliberate and systematic effort.

The British used

history of India as a tool for demoralizing the natives. History of India was twisted,
falsified and misinterpreted on a grand scale. In a letter dated December 1, 1!! the
famous Indologist "a# "uller wrote to the Du$e of %rgyll, the then &ecretary of &tate of
India, 'India has been con(uered once, but India must be con(uered again and that
second con(uest should be a con(uest by education'.. )*ef+ 'The ,ife and ,etter of -.
"a# "uller, edited by "rs. "a# "uller, 1./0, 1ol.1, p.2345. 6rof. "a# "uller was not 7ust
a philosopher, he was also an e#aminer for the Indian 8ivil &ervice )I8&5 e#amination.
Teaching of falsified history played a great part in this 'second con(uest'.
9ho were these British history writers : They were mainly army officers and
administrators of the ;ast India 8ompany. -or e#ample+
"a7or <eneral =ohn "alcolm > % "emoir of the 8entral India )1!0?5
8aptain <rant Duff > History of the "arathas )1!05
<en. Briggs > History of the *ise of "ohammedan 6ower in India )1!0.5
,t.8olonel =ames Todd > %nals and %nti(uities of *a7asthan )1!0.>205
". ;lphinstone )*esident at 6eshwa 8ourt, later <overnor of Bombay5, History of India
)1!?15
=oseph 8unningham )brother of <en.%.8unningham5 History of &i$hs )1!?.5
,t. *.-.Burton > History of &indh )1!315
Thus this is a$in to victors writing the history of the van(uished. How many %merican
9estern movies depict the generosity and the bravery of the native %mericans : Do you
$now of a single British movie depicting the courage, intelligence and s$ill of the <erman
and =apanese soldiers: Hence we can imagine what $ind of 'history' these British
officers and administrators must have written or the slant there in.
But these very boo$s became standard te#tboo$s in India and were prescribed for
teaching the later day e#aminees of the Indian 8ivil service and the Indian army.
0. ;ffect of British 1ersion of History on Indian ,eaders
&ince almost all our leaders were educated under the British system this slanted history
had tremendous impact on the psyche of our leaders. By learning such history our
leaders developed a severe inferiority comple#, and suffered from loss of self confidence
and self esteem. They started despising their ancestors. They became convinced that
unless they followed the 9est blindly, borrowed ideas, concepts and technology from her
India had no salvation.
,et us see what our leaders were saying over the years +
@These )British5 <urus have been sent by <od from far off lands@ <.H.Deshmu$h alias
,o$hitawadi in 1!?! 8; in &hatapatre no.?. This view was also shared by =ustice
".<.*anade and "ahatma 6hule.
@It must indeed be considered our good fortune that when 8hristian missionaries set out
to spread 8hristianity in the world, they did not forget India...@ Aeshavachandra, Brahmo
&ama7 leader in 1!/ 8;.
"ahatma 6hule started &atya &hodha$ &ama7 )&ociety for &earch of Truth5 in 1!42 8;.
;veryone 7oining the society had to ta$e an oath of allegiance to the British 8rown. @How
can Hindus, who were ruled by "uslims for 4// years and are being ruled by the British
for last 43 years claim to have a glorious past:@ > <.<.%gar$ar in '&udhara$' )*eformer5
in 1!!3 8;.
Bf course %gar$ar would not say the same about the &paniards or the 6ortuguese who
were ruled by the %rabs for //>4// years. %gar$ar's native "aharashtra was ruled by
"uslims for 2!/ years )10. to 14? 8;5 and not 4// years, but that did not matter5.
<opal Arishna <o$hale founded &ervants of Indian &ociety in 1./3. The members of
this order were committed to a fran$ acceptance of the British connection as ordained in
the inscrutable dispensation of 6rovidence for India's good )*ef+ 6olitical India 1!20>
1.20',=.8unning ,editor, 1.20, p.1!5.
This despite the horrors of British administration during the plague outbrea$ of 1!.4 and
4 years of suppressive reign of 8urzon )1!.!>1./35.
'The Hindus' has been a life of continuous defeat. It is a mode for survival of which every
Hindu will feel ashamed'> Dr.%mbed$ar in 1.24.
;ven the anti>Hindu writer of ';arly History of India' li$e 1incent &mith dismisses such
fantastic statements. &avar$ar wrote a resounding reply to %mbed$ar's outburst and said
'9hat %mbed$ar says is false. Hindus have survived the onslaughts of the foreigners
over the centuries because of their bravery. But even if what %mbed$ar says were true,
should he not be determined to avenge past defeats :'
%mazing C 9hat $ind of history of India was taught to our leaders :
2. British 1ersion of Indian History
The history of India, written by British authors was, in a nutshell, as follows+
Dntil the invasion of India by %le#ander the <reat, there was nothing worth mentioning in
India. %fter %le#ander, the <ree$s taught civilization to Indians, and gave them the
9estern ideas. Then came the &ha$as, Huns, Aushans etc. They also $ept teaching the
natives. In the eighth century "ohammed bin Aasim invaded India. It mar$ed the
begining of the "uslim rule. Then came the <hazanvis, <horis, <ulams, Tur$s, %fgans,
Ahil7is, Tughala(s, ,odis and "ughals. They were very brave and noble. They carried
out reforms after reforms. ,astly came the ;nglish. They could not tolerate the prevailing
anarchy. '9e rule India' they said. &ome $ings accepted their protection. Those who
resisted, collapsed li$e a dec$ of cards. The British taught peace and prosperity to this
troubled land. Dnder them everyone is happy. They introduced rule of law which Indians
never $new before.
Thus the history of hindus )according to the British5 is as dar$ as coal tar. There is
nothing in it to be proud of. It is natural that only foreigners should rule India. The best
the natives can do is to serve the British by becoming their obedient servants.
9hy could Indians not counter them with our own version of history :
?. Eeglect of History in India
It must be admitted in all fairness, that it was the British who first wrote the history of
India. The Hindus probably are the only race, who despite having such intelligence,
bravery and tremendous capacity for successive revivals, have showed such pathetic
neglect of history.
There was utter lac$ of historical sense. ,o$amanya Tila$ writes '.. ;ven if we read the
whole of Harsha>8harita by Banabhatta, we cannot ma$e out when did this famous $ing
rule or what was the e#tent of his $ingdom : Had it not been for the 8hinese traveller
Hsuen Tsang )and the ;nglish scholars who translated his memoirs from 8hinese into
;nglish5 we would have never $nown the history of Harsha ..'.
*ecords were not properly $ept and where they were $ept they were not preserved.
;ven today very important documents are getting rotten and destroyed by insects, in
many families, but the owners will not give them to historical societies.
History as a sub7ect did not always have a place in education. -or e#ample, "ahara7a of
=aipur, =ai&ingh I never learned about the history of Bappa raval, 6rithvi ra7 8huhan,
"ahmud of <hazni, "ohammed <hori and others. During the upbringing of 6eshwa
Ba7irao I, he learnt nothing about the ;ast India 8omapny and its resistance to &hiva7i at
&urat, the history of the "ughals or the history of "aratha>"ughal struggle. -ar reaching
conse(uences of such neglect were never realized.
% true historian should have the ability to doubt the validity of currently held beliefs in
light of new evidence. re7ect the traditional line of thin$ing when it becomes evident that
it was based on wrong assumptions or wea$, flimsy foundations. %nalyze the evidence
critically and establish the facts based on common sense, reason and logic.
%ll this was cleverly disallowed by the British. Historical research was reduced the drab
wor$ of compiling data and translation of documents. The faculty of interpretation was
strongly discouraged.
It is therefore essential that Indian history be rewritten.
3. *ewriting Does Eot "ean -abrication
It must be emphasized that rewriting of Indian history does not mean fabrication, as was
done by the Eazis or the 8ommunists.
&avar$ar wrote in 1.24 + ' To praise one's ancestors out of affection for them may be
foolish, but humane. However to tolerate deliberate denunciation of the ancestors
without challenging the allegations is disgraceful. Because such falsehoods, if repeated
often will ma$e us lose self respect and confidence'.
'Bnly those people avoid mention of their defeats in the past that are not strong enough
to avenge the defeats'.
'9hen writing history the writer must write the events as they happened. He should not
concern himself about the effect of that writing on present situation. .. It is natural to write
about glorious deeds of our forefathers, but we are reluctant to describe disgraceful
event or disasters, defeats. % historian must avoid such hiding of facts. 9hatever
happened in the past it should be described as it happened...'
. ,ate %wa$ening
There were some scholars during the British *a7 who realised the importance of history
in nation>building. They were furious at the state of affairs. *a7wade, 1asudevshastri
Ahare and others started wor$ around 1.// 8;. The formidable tas$ of collecting and
compiling evidence was so immense that *a7wade could not foresee the starting of
writing of the History of the "arathas, in his life time.
In 1./4 &avar$ar came to ,ondon. %fter studying the contemporary British boo$s in India
Bffice ,ibrary he concluded that he had to re7ect the traditional view of the <reat *evolt
of 1!34. It was not a &epoy "utiny as commonly believed. The British authors
themselves do not use the term &epoy "utiny, instead they call it Indian "utiny.
&avar$ar 6roclaimed that it was a 9ar of Independence in which everyone from the
"ahara7as to the road sweepers too$ part. His boo$ was promptly proscribed even
before its publication C &avar$ar protested on &eptember 14, 1./. 'If my boo$ is
seditious, why does not the <overnment show courage to ta$e me to court :' The British
%uthorities did not prosecute &avar$ar for his boo$. &uch is the importance of true
history.
In 1..1 Bharat Itihas &anshodha$ "andal )Indian &ociety for Historical *esearch5 was
formed.
In 1.1! "r.E.8.Ael$ar, one of ,o$amanya Tila$'s lieutenants, published a boo$
@"arathas and the ;nglish' which dismissed the traditional theory that "arathas lost due
to internal dissensions, lac$ of unity and lac$ of foresight.
In 1.02 "a7or B.D.Basu wrote 'The &tory of &atara' e#posing the barbaric behavior of
the British to "ahara7a 6ratapsingh of &atara who was falsely accused and dethroned in
1!2..
<.&.&ardesai's 'Eew History of "arathas' came out in 1.? e#actly 10/ years after
<rant Duff's History of the "arathas. Incalculable damage had been done in 10/ years.
But the awa$ening had begun. The (uestion then arises, why did not things change after
the British left India in 1.?4 :
4. %ppeasement of "uslims By 8ongress ,eaders
The reason why Indian history was not rewritten much after 1.?4, is to found in our
freedom struggle. <andhi returned to Indian in 1.13 and after ,o$manya Tila$'s death
became the leader of the freedom struggle. <andhi himself had shamelessly supported
the British during the British >Boer war, British>Fulu war )also $nown as Aaffir 9ars5 and
the 9orld 9ar I. In fact, <andhi volunteered to organize a brigade of Indians to put down
the Fulu uprising. &ergeant>"a7or <andhi, the deputy commander of his cops > himself
carried the stretcher of the mortally wounded British commanding officer from the Fulu
war battle field for miles over the sun>ba$ed veldt. Thence he was awarded 1ictoria's
coveted 9ar "edal for valor under fire. However by the time of his return to India <andhi
was so obsessed with %himsa )non>violence5 that he condemned *ana 6ratap, &hiva7i
and <uru <ovind &ingh for their armed struggle. &avar$ar proclaimed '9e Hindus on our
own can win our freedom from the British'. <andhi lac$ed &avar$ar's confidence and
conviction. This led to his perpetual capitulation to "uslim demands and finally
culminated in the horrors of partition.
%fter the horrible "opla riots in 1.01 when over 3/// Hindus were $illed by the "oplas
of "albar. But <andhi had no hesitation calling them '"y brave "opla brothersC' In
December 1.0 when a fanatic "uslim %bdul *ashid $illed &wami &hraddhananda who
had converted thousands of "uslims to Hinduism, <andhi immediately pleaded that
Brother %bdul *ashid's life be spared. But he refused to plead for life of Bhagat &ingh
and others only si# months later.
In 1.2! Hindus launched an unarmed struggle for their legitimate rights in Hyderabad
state, <andhi did not support them and said 'I do not want to embarrass the Eizam'.
8ongress was in power in 8.6., D.6., Bihar, Brissa, Bombay and "adras from 1.24 and
1.2.. Eot once the 8ongress ministers stood up to unreasonable demands of the
"uslims. The same lieutenants became chief ministers of various states in 1.?.
%fter independence Eehru's secularism always meant capitulation to "uslims and anti>
Hindu politics. Thus under Eehru years and early Indira <andhi rule <andhian
appeasement hangover was still intact. It must be noted that during all the ,o$ &abha
elections after 1.?4, the 8ongress party todate has EBT ;1;E BE8; received even 3/
percent of popular vote. Thus a 1/ percent vote swing can change the power e(uation in
Eew Delhi. Dnder these conditions, "uslim vote ban$ had disproportionate importance.
Thus in later years )particularly after emergency5 capitulation to the "uslim demands
and appeasement became a tool for staying in power. In the zeal for retaining the power,
true history has become the first victim.
!. ;ffect of %ppeasement of "uslims
;ncyclopedia of Britannica says @Hindu %rchitecture .. It should be noted that there
e#ists in India a vast technical literature $nown as &hilpa &hastra.. dating bac$ to <upta
period perhaps much earlier, the medieval compilations are still in use by Indian
%rchitecture.@ The first victim of appeasement is Hindu architecture which is not taught at
all in the %rchitecture and engineering schools. 9hat ever insignificant part is taught is
taught with <ree$ or *oman titles under 'Indo>&arcenic architecture'.
1eer &avar$ar delivered lectures in 1.3/>31 e#posing how the Indian history is written
with a strong anti>Hindu slant. These later appeared in newspapers. However no
publisher dare publish his boo$ '&i# <lorious ;pochs of Indian History' )This boo$
destroys the myth that Hindus suffered defeat upon defeat, and asserts that Hindus
survived aggressions because they fought tooth and nail to preserve their religion and
culture. % "D&T *;%D BBBA -B* %,, HIEDD& > you have read British and "uslim
1ersion of your history, why not read your own side of it.5 foreign invaders.
% school in Bombay used to teach <ita as the part of studies. It was not ob7ected to by
the British. But in 1.2 ;ducation Department of "aharashtra threatened to stop the
<overnment grant until <ita teaching is stopped. Bf course the government provides
grants to "adrsas and convents without hesitation.
Eehru even wanted to remove word 'Hindu' out of Benaras Hindu Dniversity, but not the
word '"uslim' from %ligarh "uslim Dniversity.
9hen %bdul *eheman %ntulay was chief minister of "aharashtra, a deputation of
"uslims demanded following+
Drdu should be a compulsory sub7ect in schools
03 G of seats in 6olice and 8ivil &ervice be reserved for "uslims
<overnment land be given to build mos(ues
%fter this, an Drdu %cademy was started in "aharashtra. <overnment newspaper
,o$ra7ya is now published in Drdu and "arathi. There are no prizes for guessing how
many people in "aharashtra spea$ Drdu )If you consider "uslims from "ira7 as Drdu
spea$ers, you must be calling Bombay Hindi as the best Hindi ever spo$en5.
Drdu was made second state language in Bihar in December 1.!/ even though the
regional language "aithily spo$en by 3 times more people was denied the status. In D.6.
Drdu was made a second language in -ebruary 1.!0.
In December 1.!1, Indira <andhi recognized the "oplas as patriots, freedom fighters
despite their barbaric atrocities on Hindus in 1.01.
=uly 1!, 1.!0 issue of '&hree' a "arathi wee$ly from "umbai carried an article by
"r.D.B.6radhan entitled '6re>Islamic 1edic *eligion in the <ulf &tates'. <overnment of
"aharashtra immediately banned the issue under the prete#t that it hurt sentiments of
"uslims. "umbai High 8ourt later declared the ban illegal.
The most flagrant and unashamed e#ample of "uslim appeasement came under
1.6.&ingh who declared 6rophet "ohammed's birthday an Indian national holiday. In his
obsession for "uslim appeasement he did not realize that the birth and death of 6rophet
"ohammed fall on the same day. That day, Id>e>"ilad was already a national holidayC
,ast year Doordarshan started a Drdu news broadcast in Banglore even though there
are more people in Aarnata$ spea$ing "arathi, Telugu, Tamil than Drdu. These led to
riots when "uslim pelted stones from a mos(ue on a peaceful procession.
During the past 3 years how many times have you heard from the <BI about the
2//,/// Hindus from $ashmir valley who are refugees out by in their own country. How
many times has <BI spo$en about rights of minorities in Aashmir valley : Eone of the
recent 2 prime ministers ever bothered to visit refugee camps even in Eew Delhi. "ean
while <BI provided free plane rides to evacuate mostly "uslim Indians from Auwait and
Ira( in 1..0.
.. %ppeasement of "uslims ,eads to -alsification of History by <BI
In December 1.24, &avar$ar said @ -ollowing appeasement of "uslims, the government
is now trying to pervert history. It is well $nown that in 121!, Harpaldev of Devagiri was
s$inned alive by Autb>uddin Ahil7i of Delhi. This fact is hidden and the history boo$s tell
us that he was simply arrested. &ambha7i, the brave "aratha $ing was also tortured to
death by %urungzeb. But history boo$s say that he too was simply arrested. How
shameless can they beC@
In the same year &avar$ar wrote @,oo$ at the present attempt by <andhi and his
followers to suppress the atrocities of "uslim rulers and even glorify them )for e.g. &ira7>
uddaula and Tipu5 .. But has this perversion stopped the riots and the arrogance of
"uslims : Eo.. It is nonsense to say that if we describe the battles or conflicts of the
past, the present generation will fight battles againC@
The practice of perverting history continues. Here are some e#amples+
In the medieval times the main source of government income was the land revenue.
Dnder Hindu rulers its used to be 1 G. Dnder %$bar it became 22 G. It stayed same
under =ehangir. Dnder the '<olden' rule of &hah =ahan it was raised to 3/ G and it
stayed the same during %urungzeb who added =izya ta# on Hindus. Dnder %llauddin
Ahil7i the land revenue also was 3/ G. This information is $ept out of history boo$s.
9e are taught that in 12/2 8; %llauddin Ahil7i defeated *a7puts and captured 8hitod
-ort. But we are never told that Hamer &ingh, a *a7put prince defeated and recaptured
the fort 1/ years later.
It is well $nown that 6rophet "ohammed fled from "ecca to "edina in 00 8;. "uslims
all over the world accept the fact. But in 1.!0 under pressure from "uslims "aharashtra
government ordered that word 'fled' must be deleted. &o now it reads that 6rophet
"ohammed went from mecca to "edina in 00 8;. ;ven Eehru would have been
amazed by this because in his boo$ '&ome <limpses of 9orld History' he does say that
6rophet "ohammed fled from mecca to "edina.
In 1.!0 the 8entral "inistry of ;ducation issued guidelines for writing and teaching of
Indian history which among other things forbid describing the medieval period as a
period of conflict between Hindus and "uslims. In short, &hiva7i's virtues should not be
glorified and %urungzeb's bigotry and despotic nature must not be described C
In 1.!0 %rchaeological &urvey of India )%&I5 in their publication 'Ta7 "useum' admitted
that on the site of Ta7 "ahal stood the mansion )manzil5 of *a7a "an &ingh which was at
the time of in possession of his grand son *a7a =ai &ingh. &o what happened to the
mansion : The answer is simple. It is the same as Ta7 mahal. But that much %&I official
would not concede.
In 1.!? 6rof."arvin "ills wrote Director <eneral of %rchaeological &urvey of India that
the Ta7 dispute be settled by scientific tests on bric$ samples ta$en on 0/ locations. The
Director <eneral replied @The Ta7 is well dated on documentary evidence. B%*8,
Bombay and 6*,, %hmedabad are also seized of the problem. )this was a lie. Both the
labs did not receive any samples for testing5 and IT I& EBT 8BE&ID;*;D D;&I*%B,;
TB H%1; %EH -D*TH;* IE1;&TI<%TIBE %T THI& &T%<;.
&uch has been <overnment of India. 9hat about the historians :
1/. %ttitude of Indian historians
In 1.!? , the discovery of so called Hitler's diaries by &tern "agazine created an
international sensation. Initially the British historian 6rof. H.T.*oper said the diaries were
authentic. ,ater when the diaries were found to be forgeries, 6rof.*oper candidly
admitted @If I am wrong, I am wrong. .. even e#perts can err@. Indian historians lac$ such
intellectual honesty. ,et us loo$ at following e#amples.
Historicity of many theories has not been challenged by Indian historians. In December
1.2, the 'Hazarat Baal')supposedly 6rophet "ohammed's hair5 disappeared from the
shrine in &rinagar. It was 'found' a few days later. -irstly, no Indian historian has
bothered to as$ that if even "ecca and "edina do EBT contain any relics of the
6rophet, where did this hair come from 4// H;%*& %-T;* TH; 6*B6H;T'& D;%TH :
%lso no Indian historian has as$ed that since the Hazrat Baal, the hair disappeared in
1.2 and reappeared a few days later, is it the same hair : &uddenly all the historians
consider it an authentic historical relic.
&econd of course is the case of Ta7 mahal. &hah =ahan's 'Badshahnama' which is the
only ma7or "ughal document the British did EBT translate )perhaps intentionally5
categorically states that it was *a7a "an&ingh's palace that was ta$en over by &hah
=ahan. In 1.! when 6.E. Ba$ published his theory based on his translation of
Badshahnama, suddenly those very pages were declared irrelevant and out of conte#t
by Indian historians. If "r. Ba$'s translation is wrong then why do the Indian historians
have courage to publish word to word translation of the Badshahnama as "r. Ba$ has
done or accept his translation.
Two letters e#posing falsity of Ta7 "ahal legend by "r Ba$, et al. were published in the
internationally renowned '*oyal Institute of British %rchitects )*IB%5 =ournal in =une and
&eptember 1.!/. Eo architect or historian has challenged these letters. Indian historians
have of course $ept (uiet.
The most glaring intentional scientific fraud by historians under government payroll,
came after December , 1..0. During the destruction of Babri structure various
remnants of the pre>e#isting temple surfaced. These included a shila>le$h describing the
origin and scale of a magnificent temple at the very site of *am =anma Bhumi, several
intricate carvings and an image of &hri *am. Instead of verifying or falsifying the
historicity of the evidence in the field, 4/ of these 'eminent' historians and archaeologists
)from =ED5 too$ at out full page advertisements in national newspapers the very ne#t
day proclaiming 'the evidence was planted'. Bf course they did not want to perform
scientific tests on the evidence. 9hat if the truth is revealed :
Bf course no Indian historian (uestioned why only the $ey pages from Babarnama, for
the 2 months of 130! 8; during his stay in %yodhya are missing :
11. *easons for the attitude of Indian historians
The reason for the deliberate distortion of history by Indian historians is that they are
afraid to lose their 7obs or the government patronage. 9hat $ind of a 7ob would a history
professor get if he is branded a Hindu reactionary and sac$ed : %lso what will happen to
their historical societies if the government patronage were stopped. %,, THI& I&
DED;*&T%ED%B,;. but then they should at least admit that their wor$ has limitations,
their freedom is restricted and that they do have to bow to political pressure. But TH;H
6*;T;ED BTH;*9I&; and mislead the people.
,et us loo$ at another e#ample of how the government pressurizes historians to conform
to its 'party line'.
B.". 6urandare's predicament+
"r. B.".6urandare has to his credit @*a7a &hiv 8hhatrapati@.But he also maintains
silence on sub7ects li$e 6admini and Ta7 "ahal. Here is how the 8ongress government
ma$es him silent.
"r. 6urandare raises money for many charitable causes, from his lectures on &hiva7i. %n
institution )a school, orphanage, a trust etc5 would arrange his lectures. The money
raised by tic$et sales would be given to "r.6urandare, which he would promptly donate
to the relevant charity. % noble act indeed C But the 'secular' government officials did not
see it that way. Income ta# officials said that the money thus raised was given to
"r.6urandare. &o it is his income and as such he must pay ta# on it C 9hile the
"aharashtra <overnment officers maintained that by delivering lectures on &hiva7i,
"r.6urandare was entertaining people. %s such he must pay entertainment ta# C %fter a
great deal of public outcry "r. 6urandare's lectures were given e#emption from the
entertainment ta#. But "r.6urandare $nows well that the secular government can
remove that e#emption any time and therefore he cannot e#pose its "uslim
appeasement.
Isn't it amazing that "aharashtra <overnment considers movies on <andhi and
%mbed$ar e#empt from entertainment ta#, but lectures on &hiva7i for a charitable
organization are not e#empt :
)Bther e#amples of historians maintaining silence despite evidence to the contrary are
"r.D.1.6otdar, Dr.<.H.Ahare, "r.&etu "adhavrao 6agdi and 6rof. *am Eath.5
10. 8onclusion
&o dear reader, neither the <overnment of India nor the Indian historians are going to
write the true history of India. Eot only that, <overnment of India is perverting Indian
history in the name of national integration C If you feel uneasy and annoyed at the state
of affairs and are concerned about the fate of the nation it is for you to help us.
*emember the teaching of falsified history affects us all, whether we stay in India or
abroad. It molds our mentality. It determines how we behave with one another and with
non>Indians and what is more important, how non>Indians treat us.