While there are those pundits who couldn't wait to proclaim that absolutely nothing had changed in Myanmar in the wake of the November 2010 elections, even they have in recent weeks been obliged to acknowledge that much has happened which they had not expected. But they take solace in their conviction that such changes as have occurred are only skin deep, window dressing, cosmetic, even illusory.
The pace of events is such, however, that UN Special Rapporteur Toms Ojea Quintana's mid- September report to the UN General Assembly has already been followed by an amnesty which has included prisoners of conscience, the suspension of the Myitsone Dam project on The Irrawaddy which has had implications for relations with China, and the passing into law of a new Labour Association Act which allows the establishment of trade unions and recognises the right to strike.
In these circumstances, we should not be surprised that credit for what is now happening in Myanmar is already been sought in the wider world. Australia has already staked a claim, following Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd's visit in July. "Australia has done much to promote change in Burma; we are the second-largest aid donor and have been in the vanguard of the policy of constructive engagement now bearing fruit," declared 'The Australian' in an editorial on 18 October. This might surprise the countries of the Association of South East Asian Nations who rather thought they were the architects of constructive engagement.
For those avenging angels Human Rights Watch, Washington Director Tom Malinowski argued in a discussion recently hosted by The Heritage Foundation that no laws had changed and no institutions had yet been reformed, but that if and when reforms did come, they would "vindicate the policies that the U.S. has pursued", but he also cautiously reminded the audience that there is still "a beast of a regime" that is not going to "voluntarily negotiate its powers and privileges without a struggle."
For some, then, the changes in Myanmar are due to their enlightened engagement. For others, serious reform has yet to come, but if and when it does, it will be because of their resolute policies of economic and political pressure. But can we all seriously claim equal justification for our so divergent policies?
The reality is that changes are occurring in Myanmar because the new administration has willed this, not because they have been compelled to reform. Against strong Western opposition, the former State Peace and Development Council pushed through remorselessly the fourth, fifth and sixth stages of their seven-stage political Road Map, namely, the Referendum on the 2008 Constitution, the Elections on 7 November 2010 and the convening of the Assemblies on 31 January 2011. From this position of strength, the new administration can go ahead as fast as it dare with the seventh stage which is "to build a modern, developed and democratic nation".
2
The Government knows where its best interests lie and it has certain goals to achieve, which are rather more substantive than just hosting the 2013 Asian Games, taking the ASEAN chair in 2014 and winning the 2015 elections, important as these particular interests are. None of them, even taken together, is as vital as the Government's awareness of the need to assure the security and stability of the State.
We are at the same time witnessing a long overdue challenge to many of the myths about Myanmar which have grown up over the years. Most of us have accepted uncritically that there were some 2,000 'prisoners of conscience' as defined by Amnesty International, a phrase which is now in use in the Burmese press and even by officials. It would now seem that there may be no more than 600- 700 such prisoners after all, and that just short of half of these could have been released under the recent amnesty.
Even UN Special Rapporteur Toms Ojea Quintana is not immune, for he refers in paragraph 13 of his latest report to the creation of a non-existent, activist-inspired supra-constitutional "Supreme State Council".
The only safe bet whenever you come across an article about Myanmar is to challenge every word you read.