Royal Prof Ungku Ai !ecture March "#$ "#%& Summary: Historic overview of Malaysia's economic development Malaysia's early leaders chose a pragmatic approach to development, than strictly abiding to socialism or capitalism. This was based on their aim to eradicate poverty Poverty eradication was implemented through industrialiation. Malaysia encouraged foreign direct investment and created a business!friendly environment "n the second phase of Malaysia's development, the goal was higher standards of living. The government invested in education to improve s#ills of the wor# force Malaysia has been successful at development. $radication of poverty has maintained Malaysia's stability and thus, economic growth However, economic disparity is necessary and desirable because the government generates ta%es from the rich, which are then used to help create opportunities for the poor &ffirmative action based on race is 'ustified because poverty is racialied $conomic growth (a bigger ca#e) benefits everybody regardless of race *ull +otes: "f we loo# bac# to time of independence, Malaysia was a poor country (believes that ,-. could have been below poverty) /hen countries gained independence, they had to ma#e a choice about how to manage their economy "n Malaysia, there was conflict between the capitalists and socialists Many who led the country to independence were influenced by socialism 0because1 they had no lin#s with capitalists Socialism sounds good because it's about e2uality ! everyone wants e2uality with coloniers Malaysia had a choice to become capitalist or socialist 3eaders had little e%perience with managing ideologies, but they entirely re'ected communist ideologies *ortunately, they decided to be pragmatists than be guided by ideologies They decided to borrow from capitalists and socialists So, in Malaysia, there are state!enterprises and , year plans which were socialist in nature, but people are allowed to ma#e money with the condition they are ta%ed This saved us because, one is tied to ideologies, even when one is hurting, one must stic# to them This is seen in the world today. Socialist and communist countries have given up 4omments that in 5ussia, wealth leveled down, rather than leveled ! everyone ended up e2ually poor Socialist countries have many problems because they are chained by the ideology of e2uality all the way through 6r Mahathir believes 7we7 did what could be done 0in terms of developing Malaysia at the time1 8ur early leaders were focused on poverty eradication since "ndependence 04ompared to other post!colonial countries1, this was 2uite special because the trend usually was that when new leaders gained power, they tended to enrich themselves 0at the cost of the people1 *irstly, the new leaders decided to attend to land hunger 0demand for land1 in Malaya. The hunger arose because land and agriculture were the only sources of wealth So, government decided to open land for settlement through programs such as *$36& However, they soon ran out of land, so they decided to create 'obs instead $arly leaders decided that we should industrialie as industrialiation created more 'obs per acre The 2uestion was, how do we industrialie9 Malaysia had problems because we had no capital, #nowledge, management schemes and did not #now the mar#et There was an attempt at import substitution, but often with import substitution, there is a cost penalty (products cost more to produce locally vs. imports) and produce poor 2uality goods The government struc# upon the idea of foreign direct investments to create 'obs :nder the *6" strategy, the government was to give up ta%es and land in order to be foreign business friendly This approach was so successful, that Malaysia even ran short of wor#ers. ;ut, it did achieve the goal of creating 'obs The second phase of the attempt to eradicate poverty was now to ensure higher standards of living The government spent money on establishing educational institutions 6r Mahathir pointed out that when he was studying in Singapore, he was only at a 7college7 as under the ;ritish, no universities had been established in Malaya /e decided that the people must have higher s#ills and better education &s more were getting education, we saw them getting better 'obs *or e%ample, with the *$36& scheme, settlers had a reasonably good life ;ut when their children received better education, they gained even better income as professionals So, one can see there is progress in the development of Malaysia, but also a correcting of imbalances Poverty is a great destabiliing force "f one loo#s at the history of $uropean industrial countries, the industries were started by the rich This resulted in great disparity which wor#ers felt unhappy about. Then came the idea of socialism, which argued that wor#ers deserved an e2ual portion of the profits. /or#ers formed unions and used the threat of stri#es as their weapon 3ater, wor#ers decided that it was not enough to have more pay, but wanted to control the means of production. So they became violent and #illed lots of rich people /e thought one of the reasons of the <=>= riots was disparity ! which was amplied by the fact that the disparity was between indigenous and non!indigenous Malaysians So, the government decided to reduce poverty. So, we tried to upgrade the poor The government spent money on education and gave out a lot of scholarships. People were educated to a high level The audience may wonder why in Malaysia, where there are ? races and other tribes, we are relatively stable The reason is, at least, we give hope to poor people to live as rich people 6r Mahathir believes that Malaysia has succeeded far more than any other country at eradicating poverty There must be some #ind of discrimination for the poor, and in this country it is for the indigenous /e decided in this country, it shouldn't be ta#ing away riches away from the rich to give to the poor This is what happened in 5ussia. They impoverished the rich, enriched the poor. "t too# 5ussia @- years to see this was wrong 8ur way is by growing the economy. /hen the economic 7ca#e7 grows, your slice grows too /e grew economic ca#e so much that people who were poor at one time, are now rich. Many professionals now are the sons and daughters of poor people $verybody en'oys a higher standard of living +on!indigenous have benefited from a bigger slice of the ca#e as well +on!indigenous already had ?-. 0of economic share1, and e%pected to grow only to A-. . So, they needed to grow less "ndigenous were only B. and needed to 'ump to ?-.. This was a big big catch up Poverty can be defined as not having enough food, shelter. This is absolute poverty "n a wealthy country, poverty is defined by certain level of wealth in comparison to the rich There will be tension between rich and poor, and in the case of Malaysia it is racialied /e wanted to reduce identification of race with economic function. To a certain e%tent, we have been successful. 5ecently, some &frica people as#ed him for advice on how to be stable He told them, they 0these &fricans1 don't understand democracy. Some parties win, some have to lose. "n a democracy, one can't win all the time and shouldn't become violent when they don't Poverty can only be eradicated through stability and economic growth *or a country with such diversity, Malaysia is more stable than many countries whose citiens are of the same race and religion /e re'ected ideology and were pragmatic. /e do what gives results CD& <. & *rench Phd student as#ed how 6r Mahathir viewed the situation of the corporatiation of public education, referring specifically to a recent increase in tuition fees by ,-. (" could not understand if he was referring to universities in *rance or Malaysia). 6r Mahathir answered that he was not aware of this issue. He commented that &merican universities such as Harvard do not have financials problem because there is a sense of gratefulness. *ormer students donate to their alma mater. "n Malaysia this is not so, what's more, some don't even pay bac# their study loans. People are a bit selfish. $specially for Muslims, one should be syu#ur. The basis of eradication of poverty is about the 2uality of people. *or e%ample, if they should #now how to be grateful. B. Haris "brahim 2uoted a <==< article by 6r Mahathir on /awasan B-B- and discussed several statistics on Malaysia's economy. He pointed out when using 5ME-- as the baseline for the poverty level inde%, Malaysia's poverty was only about >., but when one used 5M<E--, it 'umped to ?-.. He also argued that Malaysia's income ine2uality has remained the same since <=E-s, where the top and bottom B-. have the same levels of comparative wealth. However, the top <. has gained more in wealth. Thus, he posed ? 2uestions to 6r Mahathir: i. Has he driven at night through F3 to see who lives on the streets9 ii. /hat went wrong with his grand plan (/awasan B-B-)9 iii. "s he prepared to ta#e responsibility and apologie to the poor and marginalied9 6r Mahathir responded that if one loo#s at statistics, one will feel marginalied. 7/e can use this to arouse hatred for the rich7, he warned. He e%plained that rich people are useful. Malaysia had a policy to help the rich and were business!friendly because the government gets BE. of their profits. "f there were no rich, who would the government ta%9 he as#ed. He e%plained that in communist countries, the people confiscated means of production, but found when they produced goods, no one could afford them because the wor#ers themselves were poor. "f you do the mathematics in the proper way, you will find 'ustification for disparity, he advised. However, the disparity should not be too big. "f there are no rich, the government will not ma#e money. 6r Mahathir is convinced that his approach is better because it's not tied to any ideology which is why his administration decided to privatie many government functions. He cited the e%ample of Tele#om which gained 5MB.B billion in profit within B years after privatiation. 3astly he as#ed in reference to Haris' last 2uestion, apologie to whom9 ?. & :FM student 2uestioned if Malaysia's notion of development was /estern!centric9 6r Mahathir e%plained that there were many models of development. His government had adopted the 3oo# $ast Policy, so he did not thin# it was accurate to say Malaysia's development was based on a /estern system. He also asserted that Malaysia had retained certain $astern characteristics. Tabung Ha'i was an e%ample of blending /estern and $astern approaches. The fund was a brainchild of Prof :ng#u &i who had the idea that putting money into an investment fund which would enable more people perform the Ha'. A. & student as#ed if 6r Mahathir thought Prime Minister 6ato Sri Mohd +a'ib was doing enough to tac#le ine2uality, intraracial and interracial, given Malaysia's current G"+" of A>.B, as published by the /orld ;an#. He also 2uestioned if the government becomes more corporatied, would this lead to crony capitalism. *inally, he 2uestioned if the implementation of GST is 'ustified given the higher costs of living and middle!income trap Malaysians are facing. 6r Mahathir believes that when Malaysia was newly independent, income ine2uality was very big, and the government has largely corrected that. He believes there must be ine2uality, because if everybody is rich, everybody is poor. He gave the e%ample, that if one wanted a driver, one could not pay the driver the same as oneself. To mitigate the disparity though, the rich must be ta%ed to provide for the poor. This is the reality of life, he stated. 8ne cannot pay people e2ually for une2ual wor#. /hen we started affirmative action, some people obviously benefited, 6r Mahathir said. However, he 2uestioned if it could lead to crony capitalism. He argued that it was a waste to help people who had no capacity to succeed, and remar#ed that whoever became successful was then labeled as one of his cronies. He e%pressed that if one did not want crony capitalism, everybody had to be poor. He 2uestioned why there was anything wrong with being rich and complained that people were carried away by ideologies. "n respect to the third 2uestion, 6r Mahathir answered that he was not an economist and did not understand what was meant by the middle income trap. He commented that one had to ma#e a choice and that if one wanted to do better, one had to wor# harder. ,. & +igerian Ph6 student praised 6r Mahathir for his leadership and commented that he was of the opinion that Malaysia is already developed. He as#ed 6r Mahathir to comment on +igeria's development progress. 6r Mahathir answered that many &frican countries were rich in resources, and at the time of their independence, some were even more developed than Malaysia at the time. "n &frica, he said, there was a willingness to adhere to systems such as democracy. However, when a political party lost, they created instability. He commented that +igeria was unstable which was why no one wanted to invest there. Malaysia found a way to remain stable. >. & female student re2uested 6r Mahathir to comment on sustainable development and limits to growth. 6r Mahathir believes that social problems will be with humanity no matter what and we have to learn to be more tolerant. He has observed that there are now +G8s who want to replace the government. He also remar#ed that government policy plays a role in regulating growth and protecting the environment. The current government has decided that they want pollution free cars, but these will be imported, he critisied. He suggested that if a little less environment could be accepted, and local production of our needs encouraged, we could achieve the same target. "t would be slower, but cheaper, he summaried.