LAUSD Board Meeting Materials 6-10-14

1
TAB 1
WITHDRAWN PRIOR TO MEETING
2
TAB 2
Los Angeles Unified School District
Board of Education Report
333 South Beaudry Ave,
Los Angeles, CA 90017
File #: Rep-443-13/14, Version: 1
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT ACTIONS
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education (Board) ratify the contract actions taken by the Procurement
Services Division within delegated authority as listed in Attachment A including the approval of award of
Professional Service Contracts not exceeding $250,000: New Contracts and Amendments; Low Value -
Decentralized Purchase Orders; Goods and General Services Contracts: Purchase Orders, Low Value -
Decentralized Purchase Orders; District Credit Card Transactions; Rental of Facilities; Travel/Conference
Attendance; General Stores Distribution Center; and Book/Instructional Material Purchase Orders; and
approve the Professional Service Contracts (exceeding $250,000): New Contracts; Goods and General
Services Contracts (exceeding $250,000): New Contracts; listed in Attachment B.
Background:
Procurement Services staff prepares monthly reports for contract actions necessary for the execution of the
projects approved by the Board for the educational and operational requirements of the District in accordance
with Board delegated authority to the Superintendent.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of these items will allow the goods and services provided by these contracts furnishing the
equipment, supplies, or services to the Los Angeles Unified School District that support Board policies and
goals.
Board Options and Consequences:
The Board can approve all actions presented, or postpone selected actions pending receipt of additional
information. Non-ratification of actions awarded under delegated authority in Attachment A will result in
immediate unavailability of products or discontinuance of services, or both. While non-ratification may be
legally defendable, it would likely result in costly litigation over discontinued payments or if the District
attempts to reclaim payments made to a vendor. District costs will likely increase as fewer vendors compete
for future procurements. Postponement of actions presented for approval in Attachment B will delay contract
award or delivery dates.
Policy Implications:
This action does not change District policy and conforms to California Education Code section 17604 that
permits the Board of Education to delegate authority for Procurement Services (Board Report #200-12/13),
which the Board exercised on April 16, 2013.
Los Angeles Unified School District Printed on 5/30/2014 Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar
2
0123456789
Budget Impact:
The contract actions presented are within the budget authority previously approved by the Board.
Ratification of contracts awarded under delegation of authority and within their Board approved budget listed
in Attachment A includes:
Award of Professional Service Contracts not exceeding $250,000:
New Contracts; Amendments; Low Value - Decentralized Purchase Orders; and
Goods and General Services Contracts not exceeding $250,000: Procurement Transactions -
Purchase Orders; Low Value - Decentralized Purchase Orders; Rental of Facilities;
Travel/Conference Attendance; District Credit Card Transactions; General Stores Distribution
Center; and Book/Instructional Material Purchase Orders
Request for Approval of Procurement Contracts not under delegated authority listed in Attachment B
includes:
Professional Services Contracts (exceeding $250,000); and
Goods and General Services Contracts (exceeding $250,000)
Issues and Analysis:
There are no policy implications on these agreements. The Business and Government Services Team, Office of
the General Counsel, has reviewed and approved the agreements as to form.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Ratification of Contracts Awarded Under Delegated Authority
Attachment B - Request for Approval of Contract Not Under Delegated Authority
Informatives
powered by Legistar
3
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS: RATIFICATION OF DELEGATED AUTHORITY
Bd. of Ed Rpt. No. 44313/14 Page 1of 13 Board of Education
J une 10, 2014
A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $1,075,679
CONTRACTOR IDENTIFI-
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE OF
FUNDS
AMOUNT
UC Regents
UCLA Center-X
4400002742 Single-source contract to provide a Math Coach
and a Technical Integration Coordinator. At the
direction of the East Valley High Schools
Principal, the Math Coach will provide
professional development to the schools Math
Department, and/or to individual teachers. The
Technology Integration Coordinator will train
teachers to get students more involved in using
technology in the classroom and assist students
in preparing for the Smarter Balanced
Assessment Consortium computerized state
exams.
Contract Term: 04/22/14 through 06/30/14
Contract Value: $141,000
Requester: Carrie Allen, Principal
East Valley Senior High School
Title I
SIG
Cohort 2
(61%)
Title I
SIG
Cohort 2 Yr. 2
(39%)
$141,000
Los Angeles
County Office of
Education
(LACOE)
4400002679 Single-source contract to provide outdoor
science school program for 80 5thgrade
students. Students will learn about different
types of ecosystems, the different parts of an
ecosystem, how those parts function together,
and how humans interact with ecosystems.
Program is coordinated with the California
State Science Framework and the Science
Content Standards.
Requester: Cheuk Choi, Principal
Castelar Elementary School
Low Income
Transition
(45%)
Donations
(55%)
$25,120
4
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
Bd. of Ed Rpt. No. 44313/14 Page 2of 13 Boardof Education
J une 10, 2014
NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
The Regents of the
University of
California
4400002750 Informally competed contract to conduct a
rigorous evaluation of the Magnet Schools
Assistance Program. Evaluations include survey
development, data analysis and annual student
progress report.
Requester: Gloria Cole, Interim Director
Student Integration Services
Magnet
Schools
Assistance
Program
(100%)
$225,000
Public Consulting
Group, Inc.
4400002758 Informally competed contract to provide annual
licensesfor self-paced, online professional
development for Teachers, District Fellows, and
Common Core Experts that will strengthen their
content knowledge of Common Core
Mathematics.
Requester: Susan Tandberg, Director
Office of Curriculum Instruction and School
Support
Common Core
State Standards
Implementation
(100%)
$45,000
5
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Reach LA 4400002772 Named in grant mandated provider contract
to providestrategic planning for the
recruitment and implementation of
evidenced-based interventionprograms to
reduce HIV and other STDs among
adolescents. As well as provide support in
the development and facilitation of research
and evaluation for the evidence-based
intervention.
Requester: Debra Duardo
Executive Director
Health Education Programs
US Centers for
Disease Control
and Prevention
Promoting
Adolescent
Health Through
School-Based
HIV/STD
Prevention and
School Based
Surveillance
Program
Grant
(100%)
$40,000
LA Galaxy 4400002818 Single-source contract to host Beyond the
Bell (BTB) professional mentoring
seminars, panel discussionsand LAUSD
dance/drill team event. In addition,
contractor to provide enrichment soccer
coaching, player appearances, LA Galaxy
mascot appearances, program support to
promote Beyond the Bell programs, and
hosting of Beyond the Bell Night to
commemorate the students
accomplishments.
Requester: Alvaro Cortes
Executive Director
Beyond the Bell Branch
After School
Education
Safety Program
(ASES)
(100%)
$62,800
6
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Nexus IS, Inc. 4400002850 Single-source contract to provide Network
Systems Architecture Assessment to
evaluate and identify existing gaps in the
current platform, and provide next steps to
develop an architectural design capable of
supporting future data center, LAN, WAN
and telephony services.
Requester: Ronald Chandler
Chief Information Officer
Information Technology Division
General
(100%)
$47,559
Continuity Focus 4400002875 Informally competed contract to provide
advisory consulting services to develop risk
mitigation plan, testing plan, deployment
plan, and workflow optimization to improve
the execution of the Common Core
Technology Project (CCTP).
Bond
(99%)
General
(1%)
$80,000
7
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Development
Studies Center
4400002883 Informally competed contract to train
Educational Service Center and school site
leadership teams in the practice of lesson
study. Services include a two-hour
overview of Lesson Study and two(2) 2-day
LeadersInstitutes for 67 participants who
will facilitate the Lesson Study at school
sites. In addition, six (6) days of training to
model and practice the Lesson Study,
followed by three (3) day cycles
implemented at four (4) elementary, two(2)
middle, and one (1) high school site. These
activities will support the implementation of
Lesson Study and the instructional shifts of
the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
Requester: Cheryl Hildreth
Instructional Area Superintendent
Educational Service Center West
NLCB
Title I
(70%)
Core Waiver
(30%)
$133,250
Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt
4400002880 Informallycompeted contract to provide
coaching services to up to 30 6
th
8
th
grade
teachers tobuild the capacity of teachers to
practice and refine strategies for teaching
and learning, specifically on the content of
Common Core State Standards. Coaching is
to be provided in four Core content areas:
English Language Arts, Mathematics,
Science, and Social Studies.
Requester: Cheryl Hildreth
Instructional Area Superintendent
Educational Service Center West
Core Waiver
Coaching
Support
(100%)
$112,000
8
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Los Angeles
Education
Partnership
4400002861 Single-source contract to provide Common
Core State Standard-based professional
development and coaching to up to 75
teachers and administrators. The
professional development and coaching will
come in the formof nine (9) Common Core
workshops, a four-day unit-development
workshop and 310 hours of one-on-one
coaching.
Requester: Pedro Avalos, Principal
John C. Fremont Senior High School
Title I
Core Waiver
(100%)
$97,732
Los Angeles Trust
For Childrens
Health
4400002885 Named in grant mandated service provider
contract to provide resources, services, and
staff for the implementation of an evidence-
based intervention program in 20 priority
LAUSD schools to reduce HIV and other
STD infections among adolescents. As well
as provide support in the development and
facilitation of research and evaluation of the
evidence-based Intervention.
Requester: Debra Duardo
Executive Director
Health Education Programs
US Centers for
Disease Control
and Prevention
Promoting
Adolescent
Health Through
School-Based
HIV/STD
Prevention and
School Based
Surveillance
Program
Grant
(100%)
$66,218
9
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 INCOME <$102,500>
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Harvard University
Graduate School of
Education
4400002762 Revenue contract funded by the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation to compensate
teachers and administrators for participation
in pilot study and to compensate Talent
Management Division for administrative
costs associated with the participation in a
national study on the use of digital video
tools to support teacher observation, and
evaluate the impact of such observation on
improvement in teacher practice and student
performance.
Contract Value: <$51,250>
Requester: Rachel Bonkovsky
Executive Director
Talent Management Division
Revenue <$51,250>
Harvard University
Graduate School of
Education
4400002867 Revenue contractfunded by Kenneth C.
Griffin to compensate teachers and
administrators for participation in pilot study
andto compensate Talent Management
Division for administrative costs associated
with the participation in a national study on
the use of digital video tools to support
teacher observation, and evaluate the impact
of such observation on improvement in
teacher practice and student performance.
Contract Value: <$51,250>
Requester: Rachel Bonkovsky
Executive Director
Talent Management Division
Revenue <$51,250>
10
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CONTRACT AMENDMENTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $25,244
CATION &
AMEND-
MENT NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Danny Becerra
Chad H. Davis
Nina Quock
Kenneth A. Meyer
Maria R. Hazen
4400001892-1
4400002070-1
4400002080-1
4400002093-1
4400002157-1
Amendments to pass-through contracts to
increase contract capacity to provide
supplemental English/Language Artsand Math
services to Title I students attending private
schools within the attendance area of Title I
schools pursuant to the Elementary Secondary
Education Act (ESEA), formerly known as No
Child Left Behind (NCLB). This contract is a
required pass-through for the Title I Private
Schools Program with LAUSD as the Local
Education Agency (LEA).
Initial Contract Value: $60,700
*Amendment No. 1: $5,045
Aggregate Contract Value: $65,745
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
TitleI
Part A
Grant
(100%)
*$5,045
*$4,163
*$3,803
*$2,790
*$5,010
11
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
CONTRACT AMENDMENTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
CATION &
AMEND-
MENT NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Hannah Brown
Paggie J ohnson
4400002085-1
4400002084-1
*Amendment No.1: $2,295
*Amendment No.1: $2,138
Aggregate Value for seven (7)
amendments: $25,244
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
Title I
Part A
Grant
(100%)
*$2,295
*$2,138
12
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
B. AFTER THE FACT NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 ALREADY AWARDED
$141,706
The contract actions represented below are unauthorized commitments initiated by the sponsoring school or division
without a formal contract in place. This action requires the Board to ratify the contract after the fact to allow the vendor to
be paid. The District did request and has received the benefit of the services. Informative memorandum included.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
University of
Southern California
4400002678 Named in grant mandated provider contract to
provide an independent evaluation of the
implementation of the Public School Choice
(PSC) process and its effects over time.
Requester: Monique Epps, Director
Division of Intensive Support and Intervention
Investing in
Innovation
Grant
(i3)
(100%)
$141,706
13
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
C. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
The contract action(s) represented below is(are) part of the Common Core Technology Project Plan and ITD-SEP
previously adopted by the Board on February 12, 2013, under Board Report No. 157-12/13.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
None

GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
The contract action(s) represented below is (are) part of the Common Core Technology Project Plan and ITD-SEP
previously adopted by the Board on February 12, 2013, under Board Report No. 157-12/13. The total amount is
only an estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None

14
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
C. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
previously adopted by the Board on J anuary 14, 2014, under Board Report No. 129-13/14.

CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None

GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
previously adopted by the Board on J anuary 14, 2014, under Board Report No. 129-13/14. The total amount is
only an estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.

CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
15
0123456789
ATTACHMENT A
J une 10, 2014
PROCUREMENT AGREEMENTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $23,591,626
The contract actions represented below are those actions put in place within each sponsoring schools or divisions
approved budget. These delegated procurement methods represent streamline ordering tools that assist schools and
offices in meeting immediate mission-essential needs for goods or services.
QTY. OF POs/
TRANSACTIONS
Purchase Orders April 2014(Avg. Trans.- $39,343)
48 $1,888,448
Low Value Decentralized Purchase Orders (Avg. Trans. $1,687)
2,611 $4,404,267
DISTRICT CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS- (Avg. Trans. $393)
8,408 $3,308,590
Rental Facilities(Avg. Trans. $4,816)
3 $14,449
Travel/Conference Attendance(Avg. Trans. $839)
524 $439,806
GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION CENTER - (Avg. Trans. $21,151)
Informative memo included
243 $5,139,738
BOOK/INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL PURCHASE ORDERS(BPO) - (Avg.
Trans. $10,765)
780 $8,396,328
Detailed information is provided on the Procurement Services website.
D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $1,075,047
The contract actions represented below are those actions put in place within each sponsoring schools or divisions
approved budget. These delegated procurement methods represent streamline ordering tools that assist schools and
offices in meeting immediate mission-essential needs for professional services.
QTY. OF POs
Low Value DecentralizedPurchase OrdersApril 2014(Avg. Trans. $5,168) 208 $1,075,047
16
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS NOT UNDER
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
A. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
NEW CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 $37,336,673
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
AMOUNT
N. Harris
Computer
Corporation
4400002759 Single-source contract to provide software
support, services and maintenance for the
Adult Student Information System. The
system provides real-time access to data
essential for District, State and Federal
reporting and business-decision making. The
system provides statutory data-collection,
enables inter-system reporting and is the
system of record for student demographic,
attendance, and course completion data for the
Division of Adult and Career Education.
Requester: Donna Brashear
Executive Director
Division of Adult and Career Education
General
(100%)
$404,486
Hewlett Packard
Company and
EYP Mission
Critical
Facilities, Inc.,
an HP Company
4400002733
(RFP 2000000032)
Provide a secondary Modular or Container-
Based Data Center (MCBDC) solution at
BirminghamHigh School. The MCBDC will
serve as a disaster recovery and business
continuity site in the event of disruption or
major incidents in the Data Center located at
Districts headquarters.
Aggregate Five-Year Contract Value:
$14,079,183
Bond
(95%)
General
(5%)
$14,079,183
17
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
NEW CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
CTB McGraw-
Hill LLC
4400002911
(RFP 2000000124)
Providelanguage development assessments
for English Learners and Standard English
Learners for Grades K-12.
Contract Value: $4,350,000
Requester: Cynthia Lim
Executive Director
Office of Data and Accountability
Gerardo Loera, Executive Director
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and
School Support
General
(100%)
$4,350,000
Amplify
Education, Inc.
4400002912
(RFP 2000000124)
Provide Common Core State Standards
foundational reading skills assessments for
Grades K-5 and assessments in 6
th
Grade
math placement and Algebra 1 end of
course.
Contract Value: $14,186,706
Requester: Cynthia Lim
Executive Director
Gerardo Loera, Executive Director
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and
School Support
General
(100%)
$14,186,706
18
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
David Rostetter 4400002923 Contract for the Federal Court-appointed
Independent Monitor (Dr. David Rostetter).
The Independent Monitors duties under the
MCD include: Certifying when the District
has achieved the agreed-upon MCD outcomes;
Certifying when there are no systemic problems
in the District that prevent compliance with
federal and state special education laws;
Certifying when the District has met its
obligations relating to facilities under the MCD;
Reviewing the Districts progress toward
achieving the MCD outcomes; Accepting and
rejecting nominations to the Parents Council;
Verifying the accuracy of data used to measure
the Districts performance; Conductingan
annual hearing regarding the Districts
compliance with special education laws;
Preparing an annual report concerning the
progress and effectiveness of the
implementation of the MCD; Resolving
complaints regarding the MCD filed by
Plaintiffs Counsel or the District; Determining
when outcomes are to be modified pursuant to
the terms of the MCD.
includes three one-year option renewals
Aggregate Four-Year Contract Value:
$880,000
Requester: David Holmquist, General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
General
(100%)
$880,000
19
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
Authorizationto execute School Improvement Grant (SIG) funded contracts with four (4) firms toserve asthe
Educational Management Organization (EMO) for Angeles Mesa Elementary School (UCLA Center-X), Audubon
Middle School (UCLA Center-X), San Fernando Senior High School (LAEP), LegacyHigh School International
Studies (Asia Society), Woodcrest ElementarySchool (Growing Educators). Services to be provided include
professional development, coaching services and assistance in lesson development. Authority to increase or decrease
individual contract amounts within theaggregate authorized not-to-exceed total of $3,436,298.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
UC Regents
UCLA Center-X
Los Angeles
Education
Partnership
(LAEP)
Asia Society
Growing
Educators
4400002924
4400002926
4400002927
4400002928
includes two one-year option renewals
Aggregate Contract Total for Five Contracts:
$3,436,298
Requester: Nader Delnavaz, Director
School Improvement Grant
SIG
(100%)
SIG
(100%)
SIG
(100%)
SIG
(100%)
$1,397,298
$900,000
$239,000
$900,000
20
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
AMENDMENT EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
None
B. APPROVAL OF GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
Authority to award contracts for furnishing equipment, supplies and general services. The total amount is only an
estimatesince the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.
AFTER THE FACT NEW CONTRACT EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
21
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
Authority to award contracts for furnishing equipment, supplies and general services. The total amount is only an
estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.
NEW CONTRACT EXCEEDING $250,000 $2,631,603
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
Wondries Fleet 4400002735
(IFB C-1075A)
Capacity contract to provide pre-owned
hybrid or alternative fuel vehicles in
accordance with the Districts approved
Administrative Vehicle Replacement
Proposal.
includes one (1) one-year option renewal
Aggregate Two-Year Contract Value:
$570,603
Requester: Donald Wilkes, Director
Transportation Services Division
General
(100%)
$570,603
Becnel Uniforms 4400002917
(IFB 2000000106)
Capacity contract to provide cafeteria
uniforms for cafeteria employees throughout
the District.
Aggregate Three-Year Contract Value:
$2,061,000
Requester: David Binkle, Director
Food Services Division
Cafeteria
Funds
(100%)
$2,061,000
22
0123456789
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
J une 10, 2014
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
Authorize the utilization of piggyback contracts in effect. The proposed action complies with the Public Contract Code
Sections 10299 and 20118, which allows school districts to utilize other governmental agencies established contracts
and does not change District policy.
UTILIZATION OF PIGGYBACK CONTRACTS IN EFFECT EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
INCOME CONTRACTS $0
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
23
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
24
0123456789
No. 443-13/14
For 06/10/14 Board Meeting
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
LosAngelesUnifiedSchool District
Office of Curriculum and Instruction
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: May 14, 2014
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent of Schools
FROM: Susan Tandberg, Ed.D.
Director, K-12 Instruction
SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONSULTING GROUP
CONTRACT NO.: 4400002758
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $45,000
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION
This contractor will provide online professional development through instructional modules that
focus on the Common Core mathematics standards. This is designed to support teachers in a
deeper understanding of the conceptual underpinnings of the math standards with the expectation
that this will support math instruction in our schools.
Why is this necessary?
This is a contract for teacher online professional development with a specific focus on improving
math content knowledge for elementary and secondary teachers. This contract is necessary
because the Common Core State Standardsrequire teachers to have a deep understanding of the
conceptual underpinnings of the math concepts in order to effectively teach math to mastery.
Why do we need to do this now?
We need this now because we are fully implementing the Common Core State Standards in
mathematics. These standards call for teachers to teach math to a deeper level (fewer standards
are in each grade level) requiring different knowledge levels for some teachers.
What would happen if this were not approved?
Teachers may continue to teach content that is no longer required for a specific grade level and
may not have the skill sets to teach conceptually.
What are the terms of the proposed agreement?
The District will receive 300 online subscriptions to provide to teachers. Teachers will be able to
access all online courses provided by Public Consulting Group for a 1-year period. The courses
will be aligned with professional development to provide for modeling of the content the teachers
have learned.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at
susan.tandberg@lausd.net or at (213) 241-5333.
25
0123456789
Members, Board of Education -2- May 14, 2014
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
George Silva
26
0123456789
No. 443-13/14
Intensive Support and Intervention Division

INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: March 10, 2014
FROM: Monique N. Epps
Director, Division of Intensive Support and Intervention
SUBJECT: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
REQUEST FOR RATIFICATION FOR AFTER THE FACT CONTRACT
In October 2010, the Los Angeles Unified School District received an Investing in Innovation (i3)
grant from the US Department of Education to fund the implementation of the Public School
Choice (PSC) process. The PSC process focuses on enhancing the distinctive features of an open
competition. Implemented for the first time in August 2009, the PSC process allowed teams of
internal and external stakeholders to submit competitive proposals to turn around the district's
lowest performing "focus" schools (selected by LAUSD administrators based on a diverse set of
performance indicators) and to operate newly constructed "relief" schools designated to ease
overcrowding (built using funding from state and local bonds). The district's Theory of Change
behind PSC was that through rigorous screening of school plans, competition, intensive supports,
district accountability, appropriate autonomies, and community and parent involvement, a range
of school providers would be able to turn around low-performing schools and increase student
achievement. The ultimate goal of this reform was to build a diverse portfolio of high-performing
schools tailored to and supported by the local community.
The original terms of the i3 grant were from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013;
however, in September 2013, LAUSD requested and received a no-cost extension of the grant
from the US Department of Education to continue the work through September 30, 2014.
Why is this necessary? Why do we need to do this now?
Per the US Department of Education, all i3 projects are required to conduct an independent
evaluation in order to expand theunderstanding of what works in education, and helpanswer
questions about for whom and in what contexts specific interventions are most effective.
Why is this contract an after the fact?
At the time we received the no-cost extension of the i3 grant from the US Department of
Education, our office notified Budget Services and Accounting, but did not know that we were
also required to contact Procurement Services. Our budget showed that the money was still
encumbered, not triggering that we were out-of-compliance with District policy regarding this
contract. When it was brought to our attention that we needed to create a new contract with USC,
27
0123456789
Members, Board of Education -2- March 10, 2014
we started the ball rolling in completing the process only to run into a technical glitch. The
technical issue was eventually rectified, monies were released and the procurement request
continued moving through the system.
We did not ask USC to stop they work theyd been doing for the past three years while we
worked through this problem on our end because we did not want to interrupt or compromise the
evaluation of the process, which is a requirement of the US Department of Education.
Non-approval would interrupt the evaluation that USC has conducted over the previous three
years, would leave us out-of-compliance with the terms and conditions of receiving an i3 grant,
and could possibly result in LAUSD having to repay the US Department of Education the funds
received through the i3 grant.
The contract is through September 30, 2014 and expenses will be covered by a portion of the
remaining i3 grant funds.
monique.epps@lausd.net or at (213) 241-8700.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
George Silva
Donna E. Muncey, Ph.D.
28
0123456789
Procurement ServicesDivision
INFORMATIVE
FROM: George Silva, Chief Procurement Officer
Procurement Services Division
SUBJECT: GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION CENTER SPEND FOR
REPLENISHMENT OF STOCK INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES,
EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE
Duringthe Boardof Educations April 10, 2012meeting, pre-authorization was grantedto the
Procurement Services Division (PSD) to enter into various new contracts, extend existing contracts,
and award various purchase orders to make regular and routine procurements of products used by
schools and offices and stocked in the General Stores Distribution Section. As part of the pre-
authorization, it was agreed that PSDwould report on the total procurement activity on a monthly (per
board report) basis. Inan effort to streamline and enhance the reporting process, the chart below lists
the major commodity categories and total purchase order issuance for the month of April.
GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION
MAJOR COMMODITY CATEGORIES
PURCHASE ORDER ISSUANCE
APRIL1TOAPRIL30,2014
ACCUMULATIVE
FISCAL YEAR TOTAL
Furniture $561,268.88 $3,937,964.10
Office Essentials $387,058.17 $4,093,013.05
Custodial/Maint. & Operations $1,441,031.13 $5,403,931.07
Paper $2,329,221.20 $3,090,064.60
Visual Arts $181,737.82 $1,540,279.80
Educational Supplies/Tools $44,037.82 $669,233.41
Science/Home Economics/First Aid $55,259.33 $667,958.40
No. 443-13/14
For 6/10/14Board Meeting
29
0123456789
Members, Board of Education
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent -2- May15, 2014
MAJOR COMMODITY CATEGORIES
PURCHASE ORDER ISSUANCE
APRIL 1TOAPRIL 30,2014
ACCUMULATIVE
FISCAL YEAR TOTAL
Audio Visual $7,827.38 $200,299.66
Athletic Equipment $63,213.60 $299,022.61
Forms & Publications $68,926.60 $478,083.13
Music $156.18 $37,908.39
TOTALS $5,139,738.11 $20,417,758.22
If you have questions or require additional information, please contact meat (213) 241-1751.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
Marc Monforte
30
0123456789
No. 443-13/14
Division of Adult and Career Education
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Donna Brashear
Executive Director, Division of Adult and Career Education
SUBJECT: N. HARRIS COMUPTER CORPORATION
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT FOR THE ADULT STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The Division of Adult and Career Education is requesting Board approval of the professional
services contract needed to support and maintain the Adult Student Information System for the
Division of Adult and Career Education.
The Adult Student Information System captures student information andreporting and serves as
a) a budget planning tool for administrators in the assignment and allocation of teacher hours; b) a
class management tool in assessing the success and performance of courses; and c) a student
performance tool to track student competencies required to successfully complete a course. Other
functionalities include tracking of attendance hours in work experience related activities, and
student surveys. These Adult Student Information Systemcore functionalities are vital for the
uninterrupted collection of student data and federal and state reporting requirements and are not
available in the K-12 student information system.
N. Harris Computer Corporation provides software support, services and maintenance for the
Adult Student Information System. The services are critical to ensureproper functioning of the
system of record for the Division of Adult and Career Education. Additionally, all currently
existing Adult Student Information System interfaces are being adapted to function with MiSIS.
The current contract with the vendor will expire on J une 30, 2014. The Adult Student
Information System serves as the system of record for student information and enables the
instructional operations for the Division of Adult and Career Education.
31
0123456789
Yes vote means that the operating system of record for the Division of Adult and Career
Education continues to be supported and maintained to enable instructional operations and meet
State and Federal reporting requirements.
No vote means that system errors and defects will be unresolved and the Division of Adult and
Career Education will not have an operational student information system to support the reporting
needs and instructional operations.
This agreement is a one-year term for software support, services and maintenance with a not-to-
exceed contract amount of $404,486. The fixed hourly rate is $108 per hour for hourly services,
and payment is contingent upon acceptance and approval by the Executive Director, Division of
Adult and Career Education.
donna.brashear@lausd.net or at (213) 241-3758.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
Ron Chandler
George Silva
32
0123456789
33
0123456789
Members, Board of Education -2-
What are the terms of the proposed procurement?
The agreement is for a five year term. The contract value is not to exceed $14,079,183. Source of funding
is 95% Bond Fundsand 5% General Funds.
If you have any questions, please contact me at ronald.chandler@lausd.net or (213) 241-4096.
c: Michelle King Matt Hill David Holmquist Enrique Boullt
George Silva J efferson Crain
34
0123456789
^qq^` e j bkq
m=p==p~=Eml a F=a ~~=`
35
0123456789
Office of Curriculum and Instructional Support
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Gerardo Loera
Executive Director, Office of Curriculum and Instructional Support
Cynthia Lim
Executive Director, Office of Data and Accountability
SUBJECT: AWARDED CONTRACTOR NAMES: Amplify and CTB/McGraw-Hill
CONTRACT NO.: 4400002912 (Amplify)
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $14,186,706.00
CONTRACT NO.: 4400002911 (CTB/McGraw-Hill)
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $4,350,000.00
RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD, REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION,
AMENDMENT, ETC
The Office of Data and Accountability and Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School
Support recommend the awarding of contracts between the District and Amplify and
CTB/McGraw Hill to provide assessments as part of the Districts comprehensive assessment
program. These assessments are in alignment with the goals in the Districts Local Control
Accountability Plan (LCAP) regarding student achievement and the English proficiency of
English Learners. Both contracts are for a three year period.
The Districts Local Control Accountability Plan, Core Waiver Plan, Local Educational Agency
Plan and EL Master Plan all require accountabilities for student achievement in literacyand
language. Literacy assessments are used to gather evidence about learning progress, inform
instruction, provide timely interventionand guide teachers in effective instructional grouping and
decision making. The literacy assessments help teachersidentify the gap between current
learning and the expectedlearning desired in terms of academic standards and providestimely
feedback to teachers.
The monitoring of reading growth for students with disabilities is required by the Modified
Consent Decree. In addition, State Education Code Section313-313.5 on English Learner
Reclassification along withthe agreement with the Office of Civil Rights and LAUSDs English
Learner Master Plan requires the monitoring of Literacy and English language development for
English learnersand the provision of a valid assessment for determining reclassificationin grades
K-12.
No. 443-13/14
For 6/10/14 BoardMeeting
36
0123456789
Member, Board of Education -2- May 9, 2014
The state is transitioning to new assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards as
part of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC). Interim and summative
assessments in English Language Arts and Mathematics will be provided by the state for grades
3-8 and grade 11. However, there are no state interim or summative assessments for students in
grades K-2. As we transition to the Common Core State Standards, we need assessments and
assessment materials for literacyand languagedevelopment as well as math assessments to
determine placement. Additionally, the interim and summativeSBAC assessments may not meet
the requirements for the Basic English Test used to reclassify English Learners in grades K-12
and does not provide an assessment of English language development. Assessments for the new
school year cannot begin until these contracts are approved.
These assessments provide teachersand administrators with tools to assist in their instructional
decision-making and ensure that student learning is consistently monitored. If the contracts are
not approved, LAUSDwill have no assessments for students in K-2, no assessments for
foundational reading skills in grades K-5, no assessments used to meet the Ed Code requirements
to reclassify English Learner in grades K-12, no interim measures to determine English language
development and no assessments to support math placement and intervention. This contract will
cover assessments in grades K-5 and we will need to determine an additional assessment for
reclassification in grades 6-9 and 11
th
grade. Neither the District nor teachers would have
consistent formative measures of student foundational reading skills, language development and
math assessments. The District would also not have an assessment for the purposes of
reclassification in grades K-12.
There are three (3) aspects to the comprehensive assessment systemthrough these contracts:
foundational reading assessments, language development assessments, and math assessments.
Foundational Reading assessments for grades K-5 provided by Amplify. These
assessments are used to inform instruction and intervention in literacy. Similarly the
assessments will be in Spanish for students who are enrolled in Dual and Bilingual
programs. Theresults of these assessments will be used to support all studentsto ensure
that theyreceive targeted intervention. These assessments will also support studentswith
disabilities and satisfy one of the reclassification measures needed for English learnersin
grades K-5. There will be a need toidentify an additional assessments for grades 6-9 and
11.
Language development assessments for English Learners and Standard English
Learners provided by CTB/McGraw-Hill. These assessments will be used to monitor
Academic Language Development and will assist teachers in designing targetedlanguage
proficiency instruction in academic context. Language scoreswill provide information on
the progress of Academic English proficiency.
37
0123456789
Member, Board of Education -3- May 9, 2014
Math assessments for Grade 6 and 8
th
grade Algebra end of course hosted on
Amplifys platform. These assessments are used to support instruction and intervention
for students in grades 6 and Algebra 1 to provide a uniform measurement of success. The
results will also be used to support placement and interventions for students as they
matriculate to the next level.
Funding will come from General Fund, Common Core Implementation and Coordinated Early
Intervention Servicesfunds.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Gerardo Loera at 213-
241-5333 or Cynthia Limat 213-241-2460.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
Mark Hovatter
George Silva
38
0123456789
No. 443-13/14
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
INFORMATIVE
FROM: David Holmquist
General Counsel
SUBJECT: CONTRACTOR: DR. DAVID ROSTETTER

CONTRACT FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CHANDA SMITH
MODIFIED CONSENT DECREE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT
MONITOR (DR. DAVID ROSTETTER, REPLACEMENT INDEPENDENT
MONITOR)
Introduction
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide a summary review of the Districts obligations
under the Chanda Smith Modified Consent Decree (MCD) pertaining to the continued
operation of the Office of the Independent Monitor (OIM). It also provides an explanation of
the OIM contract actions that are required for implementation of the MCD in the 2014-2015
school year. The total contract values listed above include the initial period of the contract which
is the 2014-2015 school year and is inclusive of threeoption years (2015-2016, 2016-2017 and
2017-2018).
Due to the untimely passing on May 2, 2014 of Mr. Frederick J . Weintraub, the dedicated, highly
effective and respected Chanda Smith Modified Consent Decree (MCD) Independent Monitor
since 2005, the District and MCD Plaintiffs Counsel have selected and mutually agreed upon a
replacement Independent Monitor. In accordance with Section 2 of the MCD the District and
MCD Plaintiffs Counsel have stipulated that Dr. David Rostetter shall be the replacement
Independent Monitor while the MCD is in effect and until termination of the MCD. Dr. Rostetter
is the former head of the branch of the United States Department of Education responsible for
compliance with IDEA. He has also previously served in the following capacities: (1) as a
monitor and master in several special education court orders; (2) as a consultant to state education
agencies and local education agencies; and (3) as an expert witness in numerous court cases.
The MCD requires the District to compensate the Federal Court-appointed Independent Monitor
for his services and reimburse him for expenses incurred in the fulfillment of his duties under the
MCD. These expenses include office expenses and salaries for the OIM, consultant services,
costs of studies and surveys, and other MCD related expenses. The MCD provides that in the
39
0123456789
Members, Boardof Education -2- May 12, 2014
event the Independent Monitor is unable to carry out his duties under the MCD, a replacement
Independent Monitor shall be selected.
To disengage from the MCD, the District is required to meet 19 performance outcomes set forth
in the MCD in addition to other requirements. The District has met, and has disengaged from, 17
of the required outcomes. Since there are two Outcomes that have not been met, all outcomes
will not be achieved by J une 30, 2014 requiring MCD implementation and oversight by the
Independent Monitor tocontinue into the 2014-2015school year.
Since MCD implementation will continue into the 2014-2015school year, the District is required
to take the necessary actions to fund the operations of the OIM, which includes compensating an
Independent Monitor. To this end, the following items will be submitted to the Board for
approval:
1. A contract with the replacement Independent Monitor, Dr. David Rostetter, for the
2014-2015 school year in the amount of $220,000. The requested contract includes
three one-year extension options at $220,000 per year for a total contract value of
$880,000.
After these actions are complete, the District will have provided the necessary resources for the
OIM for the 2014-2015school year in fulfillment of its obligations under the MCD. It is
expected that of the threeone-year extension options, only 1-2 of the option year extensions will
be exercised as a result of the Districts continued performance on the remaining outcomes and
satisfaction of the other MCD requirements.
If the Board does not approve the contracts necessary to fund the operations of the OIM, the
District will be in violation of the MCD. This will result in the Federal District Court findingthe
District in contempt for violating the terms of the MCD by its failure to comply with the
compensation requirements set forth in the MCD.
The MCD requires the appointment of an Independent Monitor to monitor the Districts
performance to ensure the obligations under the terms of the MCD are met and that the District
compensate the Independent Monitor for his services in accordance with a professional services
agreement. The District is required to contract with Dr. Rostetter to provide for his services for
the 2014-2015school year which are the identical terms under which Mr. Weintraub served as the
Independent Monitor. Based on the average of 60 hours per month at the rate of $300 per hour,
the total not-to-exceed amount of the 2014-2015school year contract will be set at $220,000 and
is being submitted to the Board for approval with the threeone-year extension options discussed
above.
40
0123456789
The MCD authorizes the Independent Monitor to retain such consultants, experts and other
personnel as may be reasonably required by him to assist in his duties under the MCD. Further,
the MCD requires that the District reimburse the Independent Monitor for all expenses incurred
by himin performing his duties under the MCD and compensate and reimburse the expenses of
any consultants, experts and other personnel that he may reasonably require to assist him in
performing his duties under the MCD.
david.holmquist@lausd.net or at (213) 241-6601.
c: Michelle King
Matt Hill
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
George Silva
41
0123456789
No. 443-13/14
Intensive Support and Intervention

INFORMATIVE
FROM: Dr. Donna E. Muncey, Chief of Intensive Support and Intervention
Nader Delnavaz, Director, School Improvement Grant
SUBJECT: SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) APPLICATION: EMO APPROVAL
The CDE approved the School Improvement Grant, Cohort 3, on May 8, 2014 with a total
award to the District of approximately $48 million over the next three years beginning
with the 2014-15 school year. Eight LAUSD schools were approved, out of a total of
eleven schools statewide. Implementation is set to begin J uly 1. Six schools were
approved as a Restart Model requiring an Educational Management Organization (EMO).
EMOs can be either a for-profit or non-profit organization that enters into an agreement
through a contract or MOU to provide comprehensive support to the school. There are
currently five schools in SIG cohort 1, and one in cohort 2, that are under the Restart
model with an EMO.
Five of thecohort 3Restart schools have a cost for the EMO partnership. One EMO
(CSU Dominguez Hills) is working through an outside grant with LA High and is
therefore no cost to the District. In order for the Restart schools to be able to implement
their approved plan, the EMO selection and criteria will need to be approved by the Board.
The grant award amountsfor all eight schools are as follows:
Schools Model Grant Amount Year 1 Grant Total
Angeles Mesa ES Restart $1,900,000, $5,700,000
Audubon MS Restart $1,900,000 $5,700,000
Legacy International
Studies HS Restart $1,900,000 $5,700,000
San Fernando HS Restart $1,900,000 $5,700,000
Woodcrest ES Restart $1,893,288 $5,691,816
Los Angeles High School Restart $1,899,735 $5,699,205
Sun Valley MS Transformation $1,900,000 $5,700,000
Fulton College Preparatory Transformation $1,899,985 $5,699,897
42
0123456789

Board approval is requested for the EMOs noted below. The Scope of Work for each
describes in detail the partnership and accountabilities for the three years of the SIG.
School EMO EMO Cost -Year 1 EMO-Total Cost
Angeles Mesa EL UCLA $334,000 $981,996
Audubon MS UCLA $118,000 $415,302
Legacy International
Studies HS
AsiaSociety Intl
Studies Network
$93,000 $239,000
San Fernando HS LAEP $300,000 $900,000
Woodcrest ES Growing Educators $300,000 $900,000
Los Angeles HS CSU Dominguez Hills No Cost No Cost
We are requesting approval for the following four contractsin order to begin
implementation J uly1:
EMO School Contract # Terms % Amount
UCLA Center
X
Angeles Mesa
ES and
Audubon MS
4400002924 Contract
Term: 07/01/14
through 06/30/17
includes two one-
year option
renewals
SIG
(100%)
$1,397,298
Los Angeles
Education
Partnership
(LAEP)
San Fernando
HS
4400002926 Contract
Term: 07/01/14
through 06/30/17
includes two one-
year option
renewals
SIG
(100%)
$900,000
Asia Society Legacy
International
Studies HS
4400002927 Contract
Term: 07/01/14
through 06/30/17
includes two one-
year option
renewals
SIG
(100%)
$239,000
Growing
Educators
Woodcrest ES 4400002928 Contract
Term: 07/01/14
through 06/30/17
includes two one-
year option
renewals
SIG
(100%)
$900,000
As additional information, the two schoolsapproved as a Transformation models, Fulton
College Preparatory and Sun ValleyMiddle School, have the following summary of
requirements:
Replacement of principal (on or after 7/1/2011),
Rigorous, transparent, equitable evaluation of teachers and principals,
Identify and reward schools, teachers, and leaders,
Ongoing professional development for instructional staff
Increased opportunities for promotion and career growth to recruit, place, and
retain staff
43
0123456789

Data driven instructional program
Increased Learning Time (ILT)
o in core program
o in enrichment program
o in teacher collaboration time
If you have any questions, please contact Nader Delnavaz at 213-241-2144 or
nader.delnavaz@lausd.net.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
George Silva
44
0123456789
No. 443 - 13/14
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Donald Wilkes, Director
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE CONTRACT AWARD TO
BOB WONDRIES FORD
CONTRACT AMOUNT: NOT TO EXCEED $570,603.00
This purpose of this Informative is to request the contract award to Bob Wondries Ford for
the purchase of alternative fuel administrative vehicles.
There is a need to replace administrative vehicles that have far exceeded their economic
life cycle. Continued use of these vehicles has resulted in higher operational costs and
diminished safety. This contract will allow for economical replacement of vehicles with
the highest mileageand maintenance costs.
If vehicles with high mileage and maintenance costs remain in operation, they reach a
point where they are beyond economical repair and are more costly to maintain than a
newer alternative fuel vehicle.
The Los Angeles Unified School District would continue to accrue high repair and
operating costsresulting in a net loss, far exceeding the value of the vehicles.
The intent is to replace twenty-four (24) older model administrative vehicles with newer
alternative fuel vehicles. Funds from the salvage of the older vehicles will be used to
offset the cost of this purchase.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at
donald.wilkes@lausd.net (213) 580-2920.
c: Michelle King George Silva
Matt Hill Maria Casillas
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
45
0123456789
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: April 30, 2014
FROM: Donald Wilkes, Director
SUBJECT: FOLLOW UP TO BOARD MEMBER INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING
ADMINSTRATIVE STAFF VEHICLE ASSIGNMENTS
(BOB WONDRIES FORD CONTRACT NO.: 4400002735)
This Informative is provided in responseto a request for information regarding the rationale for
assigning District vehicles to Senior Administrative Staff versus mileage reimbursement or
monthlystipends for personal car usage.
DISCUSSION
Los Angeles Unified School District Board rule 1537 authorizes the Superintendent to approve
the issuance of a District vehicle for employees whose mileage reimbursement is likely to reach
or exceed a specified threshold over the period of a school year.
Currently, District vehicles are provided for Senior Administrative staff that are on 24 hour
responsein support of students and schools. Whenever there is a Level Oneemergency or major
incident at a school, District facility, or location involving District students and employees,
Administrative staff will respond to provide support, oversight, and communications on behalf of
the District. Level One responsesinclude emergencies that could lead to school closuresor mass
assistance to fires, windstorms, earthquakes, student demonstrations, bus/vehicular accidents
with injuries, police activity surrounding or inside a school or District site.
District Administrator vehicles are equipped with emergency two-way radios which allow direct
communication with school staff, School Police, and District support personnel to attend to the
immediate student and staff needs. These radios operate in a special frequency which allows for
continued communication when conditions limit cellular or landline communications. District
Administrator vehicles have special exempt license plates which are recognized as emergency
responders at the scene of an emergency. Police and Fire Departments for Los Angeles City and
County recognize vehicles with exempt license plates as emergency response personnel allowing
for immediate accesswhere personal vehicles would not be allowed.
If cost were the only consideration, mileage reimbursement would be less expensive when
compared to the cost per mile of maintaining a fleet of vehicles(see chart below).
Average Annual Cost Per Mile To
Maintain Administrative Staff
Vehicle
Current IRS Mileage
Reimbursement Rate
Average Annual
Business Miles
Annual Cost Savings
Paying Mileage
Reimbursement vs.
Maintaining District
Vehicle
0.61 0.56 6,000 $240
No. 443-13/14
46
0123456789
Members, Board of Education -2- April 30, 2014
However, the aforementioned benefitsof support and response to students and school
communitiesfar outweigh thecost.
Mileage reimbursement and stipends are options utilized within LAUSD for reimbursing
employees who use their personal vehicles for work related business however, the use of personal
vehicles does not provide staff with the communication and accesstorespond in a timely manner
to emergency situations affecting the safetyand security of LAUSD students, staff and personnel.
Please feel free to contact me at (213) 580-2920should you require additional information.
c: Michelle King
Matt Hill
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
47
0123456789
FoodServicesDivision
INFORMATIVE
FROM: David Binkle
Director, Food Services Division
SUBJECT: Becnel Uniforms, Contract No: 4400002917
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $687,000 Yearly
Food Services Division is requesting the Board of Education to approve the award of contract to
Becnel Uniforms for the purchase of cafeteria uniforms and tailoring service. The cafeteria uniforms
will be used by cafeteria employees throughout the District, including the Newman Nutrition Center.
Currently, there is no standardized employee uniform for the Food Services Cafeteria Manager,
Senior Food Services Worker and the Food Services Worker. These employees are required to
follow a dress code that meets the standard of safety and health code regulations but it is not
uniform nor does the District provide it. Uniformity promotes safety at the school site as it clearly
identifies to students, staff and the general public authorized cafeteria personnel and helps to
develop a sense of trust and recognition among customers.
As our recent marketing efforts increase the awareness of our Caf LA brand, it is essential to
maintain the consistency of our brand throughout the cafeteriaenvironment. The Food Services
employees at school cafeterias are our front line communicators to the community, students and
Administrators. Having uniforms for these employees will provide a professional appearance and
will have an impact on the publics perception of our school meal program, as well as, our
employees attitudes about their job andopportunity for promotion.
If the contract is not approved, our Food Service employees will continue to follow a dress code that
meets the standard of safety and health code regulations but the dress code will not be uniform
across the district and will not provide Food Services with the opportunity for standardization of
identity, promotion and image enhancement.
The termsof the contract will be 36months. Funding will be provided100% by Cafeteria Funds.
If you have any questions, please contact Laura Benavidez, Deputy Director at laura.benavidez@lausd.net
or 213-241-2999.
c: Michelle King J efferson Crain George Silva
Dave Holmquist Laura Benavidez
Enrique Boullt Timikel Sharpe
No. 443-13/14
For 06/10/14Board Meeting
48
0123456789
TAB 3
Facilities Services Division Contract Actions
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education (Board) ratify the Facilities Services Division (FSD) contract
actions taken by Facilities Contracts under delegated authority as listed in Attachment A including: award of
advertised construction contracts; 17406 contracts; approval of change orders; completion of contracts; award
of informal contracts; rejection of bids; award of architectural and engineering contracts; award of task order
contract amendment; award of professional/technical service contracts/amendments; extra
services/amendments; and approve the proposed contract actions as listed in Attachment B including:
approval of contract amendment; and professional service contracts/amendments.
Background:
Facilities Contracts staff prepares monthly reports for contract actions necessary for the execution of projects
approved by the Board and contained in the FSD Strategic Execution Plan (SEP),and for the maintenance and
operation of District facilities in accordance with District policies and Board-delegated authority. As described
in the November 12, 2013 BOE 048-13/14 Informative, detailed information is provided on the Facilities
Services website.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of these items will allow services provided by these contracts to proceed in support of FSD projects,
District policies and goals, and the Board-approved FSD-SEP.
The Board can approve all actions presented or postpone selected actions pending receipt of additional
information. Non-ratification of actions awarded under delegated authority in Attachment "A" will result in the
immediate discontinuance of services. While non-ratification may be legally defendable, it will likely result in
costly litigation over discontinued payments or if the District attempts to reclaim payments made to a vendor.
District costs will likely increase as fewer contractors compete for future procurements.
This action does not change District policy and conforms to California Education Code Section 17604 that
permits the Board of Education to delegate authority for Facilities Contracts (Board Report #200-12/12), which
the Board exercised on April 16, 2013.
Budget Impact:
The contract actions presented are within the budget authority previously approved by the Board.
There are no policy implications on these agreements.
powered by Legistar
Attachments:
Attachment "A" - Ratification of Facilities Contract Actions Awarded Under Delegated Authority.
Attachment "B" - Approval of Facilities Contract Actions Not Under Delegated Authority.
powered by Legistar
ATTACHMENT A
RATIFICATION OF CONTRACTS AWARDED UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Bd. of Ed Rpt No. 454 13/14 Page 1 of 4 Board of Education
June 10, 2014
A. AWARD OF ADVERTISED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS $3,915,154
CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO. SCHOOL / PROJECT AMOUNT

Royal Construction & Builders, Inc.
(SBE)
1410100 / 4400002860 Narbonne HS
Fire Life Safety, Path of Travel for DSA
Certification
Board Member: Richard Vladovic
$795,000

Beta Investments and Contracts, Inc.
(SBE)
1410101 / 4400002773 Holmes MS
Replace HVAC System in Gym, Install Fire
Suppression System in Existing Cafeteria Kitchen
Board Member: Tamar Galatzan
$544,500

Eberhard (SBE) 1410103 / 4400002830 Perez Special Education Center
Remove and Replace Deteriorated Roofing
Board Member: Mnica Garca
$387,419

Enterprise Construction, Inc. (SBE) 1410108 / 4400002865 Canoga Park HS
Small Learning Communities
Board Member: Tamar Galatzan
$845,000

The District has engaged in two-tier procurement for its Year 2012 Local Area Network (LAN) Modernization Projects (ITD/E-Rate) partially
funded by Federal E-Rate grants. The nine (9) contracts below represent the 2nd tier procurement made pursuant to Public Contract Code
Section 20118.2.

Camali Corporation (SBE)

1410092 / 1300025 Taper ES
$ 145,158

1410093 / 1300026 Westwood Charter ES
Board Member: Steve Zimmer
$107,992

1410095 / 1300026 Wonderland ES
$ 75,000

1410102 / 1300026 Pacific Palisades ES
$ 155,000

1410105 / 1300172 Bryson ES
Board Member: Bennett Kayser
$168,600

1410106 / 1300174 Magnolia ES
$255,000

Construct Alliance, Inc. (SBE) 1410099/ 1200206 Stevenson MS
$212,275

GOP Electric, Inc. (SBE) 1410107 / 1200203 Ascot ES
$153,500

Servitek Solutions, Inc. (SBE) 1410110 / 1200204 Selma ES
$70,710

ATTACHMENT A

June 10, 2014

17406 CONTRACTS / AMENDMENTS $3,307,300

CONTRACTOR CONTRACT NO. SCHOOL/PROJECT AMOUNT
H. A. Lewis, Inc. 4400002831 / 1410089 Huntington Park HS
HVAC Upgrades for Auditorium,
Gymnasiums, and Weight Room

$2,110,000

Ian Thomas Group, Inc. 4400002910 / 1410104 Arleta HS
Exterior Facade Rehabilitation
Board Member: Mnica Ratliff
$1,197,300

JOB ORDER CONTRACTS / AMENDMENTS

None

B. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS $2,624,849
QUANTITY AMOUNT
Construction contracts that have change orders which do not individually
exceed 10 percent for April 2014 (Average Transaction: $6,997).
229 $1,602,289
Repair and modernization contracts that have change orders which do not individually
exceed 15 percent for April 2014 (Average Transaction: $12,173).
84

$1,022,560
Repair and modernization contracts that have change orders which individually exceed 15 percent (but
do not exceed 25 percent) for April 2014 that require 75 percent approval by the Board.
0 $0

QUANTITY
C. COMPLETION OF CONTRACTS April 2014 21

D. AWARD OF INFORMAL CONTRACTS (Not Exceeding $84,100) $608,602
QUANTITY AMOUNT
A & B Letters for April 2014 (Avg. Trans. $13,230) 46 $608,602

E. REJECTION OF BIDS
BID NO. SCHOOL/PROJECT REASON

1410096 Compton ES
Local Area Network Modernization

Bid was rejected due to excessive cost. The scope will be
reduced. The school administration has been notified. The
project will be re-advertised with an anticipated construction
start date in September, 2014.

1410113 Stonehurst ES
Local Area Network Modernization
Board Member: Monica Ratliff

Bid was rejected due to excessive cost. The scope will be
reduced. The school administration has been notified. The
project will be re-advertised with an anticipated construction
start date in August, 2014.

1410122 Stevenson MS
HVAC Replacement
Board Member: Mnica Garcia
All bids were rejected due to the revisions to the scope of
work. The bidding documents will be revised to incorporate
all of the required work. The school administration has
been notified. The project will be re-advertised with an
anticipated construction start date in June 2014.

ATTACHMENT A

June 10, 2014
F. AWARD OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS $428,803

The twelve (12) contracts below are for HVAC Site Analysis services pursuant to the Amended Facilities Services
Division and Information Technology Strategic Execution Plans to Define and Approve 309 School Facilities
Improvements Projects approved by the Board on June 18, 2013 (BOE #317-12/13). Funded by bond funds.

CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO.

SCHOOL/PROJECT

NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT
Gonzalez Goodale Architects
(SBE)
1420035/ 4400002719

Van Nuys ES
HVAC Replacement
Board Member: Mnica Ratliff
$51,780

Hibser Yamauchi Architects 1420036/ 4400002760

Loreto Street ES
Boiler Replacement - 3 Buildings
$27,514

1420042/ 4400002769

Rowan ES
HVAC Replacement Main Building
$31,180

Dougherty + Dougherty
Architects, LLP (SBE)
1420037/ 4400002761

State Street ES
HVAC Replacement
$43,042

PBWS Architects, LLP (SBE) 1420038/ 4400002764

Griffin ES
HVAC Replacement
$24,121

1420039/ 4400002765

West Vernon ES
HVAC Replacement
$29,620

1420041/ 4400002820

Taft HS
HVAC Replacement Administration Building
$26,661

James Heimler, Architect, Inc.
(SBE)
1420040/ 4400002767

28
th
Street ES
Heat Pump and Cooling Tower Replacement
Board Member: Monica Garcia
$41,799

1420044/ 4400002823

Burton ES
HVAC Replacement
$38,289

Harley Ellis Devereaux 1420043/ 4400002768

Perez Special Education
HVAC Replacement
$37,056

DLR Group 1420047/ 4400002824

Paseo Del Rey Elementary Natural Science Magnet
School
HVAC Replacement
$38,000

Berliner and Associates
Architecture (SBE)
1420048/ 4400002882

Carver MS
HVAC Replacement
$39,741

ATTACHMENT A

June 10, 2014
G. AWARD OF TASK ORDER CONTRACT / AMENDMENT $200,000

(Amendment No.)
DESCRIPTION

NOT-TO-EXCEED
CAPACITY INCREASE
IBI Group

1220024/4400001700.04

Architectural Support Services for Asset Management
Re-design of Small Learning Community Components
at Marshall High School due to scope change per
school requirements

Current Contract Term: 9/27/11 through 9/30/15
Plus 2 Option Years (OY)

Initial Contract Value:
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 3
*Amendment No. 4

Aggregate Contract Value:
$160,000
$120,000
$270,000
+ OY 1
$200,000
+OY2
$750,000

$200,000*
H. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENTS $118,540

(Amendment No.)
DESCRIPTION

NOT-TO-EXCEED
CAPACITY INCREASE

Athena Parking, Inc. 1090056.07 / 4400000684 Parking overflow and emergency supply container
storage at surface parking lots in proximity of Beaudry
Building

Including 4 Option Years (OY)

Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2

Amendment No. 3
Amendment No. 4

Amendment No. 5

Amendment No. 6
Amendment No. 7
*Amendment No. 7
$8,000
$6,000
$14,000
+OY 1
$2,800
$25,200
+OY 2
$14,000
+OY 3
$17,500
OY 4
$42,000
$129,500
$42,000*
General Funded

Building Safety Solutions,
Inc. (SBE)
1290095 / 4400000598 Provide Fire Life Safety training and video for the
Beaudry Building

Plus 2 Option Years (OY)

Amendment No. 1

Amendment No. 2
*Amendment No. 3

$76,540
$76,540
+OY1
Exhibit B
$76,540
+OY 2
$229,620

$76,540*
General Funded
I. EXTRA SERVICES / AMENDMENTS $447,423
CONTRACT NO. 0120295 / 4400000045, 0420143 / 4400000117, 0420156 / 4400001562, 0520025 / 4400001566, 0520026 / 4400000132,
0520055 / 4400000141, 0520076 / 4400000144, 0520082 / 4400000145, 0520115 / 4400000149, 0520136 / 4400000156,
0620018 / 4400000201, 0620098 / 4400000251, 0720013 / 4400000350, 0820037 / 4400000430, 1320010 / 4400000616

ATTACHMENT B
APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS NOT UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
Submitted on June 2, 2014 Revision #1 June 10, 2014

A. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT $293,839
Staff proposes that the Board of Education authorize an amendment to add the purchase option to the contract thus allowing the District to
purchase 32 modular buildings from William Scotsman, Inc., in the amount of $293,839. William Scotsman, Inc. leased the 32 modular
buildings to the District via a previously awarded contract and staff is requesting approval to amend the contract with an option to purchase.
Purchasing these buildings will allow the District to realize a net savings of more than $200,000 within two years.

(Amendment No.)
DESCRIPTION NOT-TO-EXCEED
CAPACITY

William Scotsman, Inc. 0931090 Amendment #1 to add the purchase option to the
contract.
$293,839
General Funded

B. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENT $1,150,000

(Amendment No.)
DESCRIPTIION

NOT-TO-EXCEED
CAPACITY
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. 1390032.01 / 4400001483 Amendment to add time and capacity to provide
Program Management Services and Support to
Facilities Services Division.

Including one 1-year extension (Y1)

*Amendment No. 1

$950,000
$650,000
+ Y1
$1,600,000

$650,000*
The Gordian Group 1090001.04/.05 /
4400001406
Amendment to capacity contract to provide Program
Management Services for the Districts Job Order
Contracting Program.

Initial Contract Term: 10/01/09 through 9/30/14
Including 3 Option Years (OY)

Initial Contract Value: $2,000,000
Amendment No. 1: OY 1
Aggregate Contract Value: $2,500,000
$500,000*

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

Facilities Services Division

INFORMATIVE

TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: June 2, 2013
Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent of Schools

FROM: Yvette Merriman-Garrett
Director of Facilities Contracts

SUBJECT: REVISED BOARD REPORT NO. 454-13/14 ATTACHMENT B
APPROVAL OF FACILITIES CONTRACT ACTIONS NOT UNDER
DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Please note that the original Attachment B of the Facilities Contracts Board Report No. 454-13/14
for the June 10, 2014 Meeting of the Board of Education has been changed. Please use revision
number 1 submitted on June 2, 2014 that includes the following change:

Page 1

Approval of contracts not under delegated authority listed in Attachment B:

A. Approval of Amendment to Contract William Scotsman, Inc., $293,839

The contract action proposed for approval has been revised from a Sole Source Contract to
an Amendment to a Contract. The description has been modified accordingly:

Staff proposes that the Board of Education authorize an amendment to add the purchase
option to the contract thus allowing the District to purchase 32 modular buildings from
William Scotsman, Inc., in the amount of $293,839. William Scotsman, Inc. leased the
32 modular buildings to the District via a previously awarded contract and staff is
requesting approval to amend the contract with an option to purchase. Purchasing these
buildings will allow the District to realize a net savings of more than $200,000 within two
years.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 241-3087.

cc: Michelle King
Mark Hovatter
David Holmquist
Tony Atienza
Jefferson Crain

Members, Board of Education -2- February 20, 2013
Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent

No. 454-13/14
For June 10, 2014 Board Meeting


INFORMATIVE

TO: Members, Board of Education Date: June 2, 2014
Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent

FROM: Yvette Merriman-Garrett, Director of Facilities Contracts

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO AMEND CONTRACT
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC.
CONTRACT NO. 1390032 AMENDMENT AMOUNT: $650,000

Introduction

The Los Angeles Unified School District (District) is currently administering a multi-billion, multi-
year school construction and modernization program. The District is entering into an agreement with
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. for senior level Program Managers, Program Management Support Staff
and Program Review Services.


Currently, there are four contract professionals (CPs) providing services in the Facilities Services
Division (FSD) under an existing professional services agreement which expires June 30, 2014. The
four contract professionals play very important roles in this program and provide experienced
management and leadership in three important functional departments including Program
Management, Facilities Technology Services and Program/Project Controls. The Board approval is
required for Facilities Contracts to extend the current professional services agreement to Parsons
Brinckerhoff, Inc. to continue program management services for one additional year.


The Districts existing professional services agreement with Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. is expiring on
June 30, 2014. The Facilities Services Division continues to need the experienced management and
leadership these individuals provide to the Bond Program.


The Director of Program and Project Controls is responsible for a department of more than 60 staff
members managing major functions such as budget and bond funds management, strategic planning
& monitoring, financial operations, reporting & analysis, and scheduling & estimating functions
related to construction projects.

Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent -2- June 2, 2014

The Director of Technology Services is responsible for a department of more than 30 staff members
providing Facilities staff with the technology tools needed to do their jobs, and to help them use
those tools. This position is responsible for the following four major groups/units: helpdesk support,
enterprise applications, custom applications and system/database administration.

The Senior Program Manager and the Program Manager positions provide high level management
and oversight for scope, schedule and budget related to managed capital facilities programs.
Examples of managed programs include Air Conditioning, Fire Alarms, Small Learning
Communities, Career Academies, Core Facilities and Early Education Centers.

FSD has reviewed several options to see how we can avoid the disruption to the Bond Program if we
lose their services. None of these options appeared to be cost effective or viable at this time. FSD
also tried to fill the Director of Program and Project Controls and Technology Services positions
using District employees but, the personnel commission was unsuccessful in finding the suitable
candidates. A yes vote will allow the four CPs to continue for up to an additional year until the
construction management contracts are re-procured. This will provide continuity and avoid
disruption to the Bond Program.


Terms and conditions of this contract are consistent with the expiring professional services agreement
Number 1390032. This professional services agreement will provide the following four
technical/professional staff to support the Districts school construction program:

Director of Program and Project Controls
Director of Facilities Technology Services
Senior Program Manager
Program Manager
The amendment is to add one year and increase the not-to-exceed contract value by $650,000 for
the final term of the agreement, for an aggregate total of $1,600,000. The agreement will expire on
June 30, 2015. This contract is fully funded using bond funds.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Raju Kaval at
raju.kaval@lausd.net or at (213) 241-7056.

c: Michelle King
Mark Hovatter
Matt Hill
David Holmquist
Jefferson Crain
Kenneth Bramlett
Raju Kaval
No. 454-13/14


INFORMATIVE
DATE: June 2, 2014
TO: Members, Board of Education
John E. Deasy, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools

FROM: Yvette Merriman-Garrett, Director of Facilities Contracts

SUBJECT: THE GORDIAN GROUP
JOB ORDER CONTRACTING (JOC) PROGRAM MANAGER (PM)
RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE CONTRACT CAPACITY
CONTRACT NO.: 1090001 CONTRACT AMOUNT: $2,749,000

The current Job Order Contracting (JOC) Program Manager (PM), The Gordian Groups (TGG)
contract, expires on September 30, 2014. The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is
committed to continue utilizing TGGs services to provide JOC PM and technical services and
maintenance of the construction price catalog to support LAUSDs Job Order Contracting (JOC)
Program pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 2580, et seq. through the end of the contract term.

Job Order Contracting is an alternative and optional (best value) delivery method for bidding
public works projects. It is used to accomplish a large number of individual projects under a
single master contract awarded to the most qualified and prequalified bidder.

Due to the high volume of the Wireless Local Access Network (WLAN) Program projects
initiated by Project Execution (PEX) in mid-2013, it is necessary to increase TGGs existing
$2,249,000 contract an additional $500,000 for a total contract capacity of $2,749,000.

TGGs contract will support the Districts Common Core Technology Initiative under PEXs
WLAN Program to deliver and complete wi-fi installation and construction projects by the end of
this calendar year.

Due to the increased volume of work under the WLAN Program in addition to other repair and
construction work being delivered by PEX and Maintenance and Operations (M&O, additional
funds are required. We need to continue utilizing TGGs services to accomplish and execute
these construction projects.

What would happen if this was not approved?
If this recommendation is not approved, it would jeopardize the JOC Programs maintenance,
repair and modernization projects and disrupt completion of the WLAN projects expected to be
completed by the end of this calendar year to equip the schools with wireless connectivity to be
Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent -2- June 2, 2014

able to use iPad, laptops, and other devices, etc. related to the Common Core Technology
Initiative.

The amendment is to increase the contract value for the final term of the agreement. The
agreement will expire at the end of the term in September 2014. Prior to that date, the District
will re-procure these services.

If you have any questions and/or require additional information, please contact
judith.reece@lausd.net at (213) 241-1090 or christy.guzman@lausd.net or at (213) 241-1188.

JR: cg

c: Michelle King
Mark Hovatter
Matt Hill
David Holmquist
Jefferson Crain
Judith Reece

TAB 4
Approval of Routine Personnel Actions
Action Proposed:
Approve 2,080 routine personnel actions (including, but not limited to elections, promotions, transfers, leaves,
terminations, separations, permits and contracts) according to the following breakdown:
Certificated: 522
Classified: 1,376
Unclassified: 182
It is proposed that the following routine personnel actions (including, but not limited to elections, promotions,
transfers, leaves, terminations, separations, permits and contracts) be approved.
SAP transaction numbers: 1854684 to 1865790
ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS
Total (this report) Total
(04/23/2014 to 05/16/2014) (Year-to-date)
1. Certificated 522 231,046
2. Classified 1,376 170,239
3. Unclassified 182 88,093
TOTAL 2,080 489,378
BREAKDOWN OF ACTIONS
Actions Certificated Classified Unclassified Total
Hire 177 30 78 285
Leaves/Paid 50 65 0 115
Leaves/Unpaid 7 33 0 40
Reassignments/Demotions 2 0 0 2
Reassignments/Transfer 126 156 9 291
Reassignments/Promotions 113 32 0 145
Retirements 31 12 0 43
Separation/Non-
Resignations
56 37 36 129
Separation/Resignation 41 18 16 75
Other Actions* 773 139 43 955
powered by Legistar
56
0123456789
Actions Certificated Classified Unclassified Total
Hire 177 30 78 285
Leaves/Paid 50 65 0 115
Leaves/Unpaid 7 33 0 40
Reassignments/Demotions 2 0 0 2
Reassignments/Transfer 126 156 9 291
Reassignments/Promotions 113 32 0 145
Retirements 31 12 0 43
Separation/Non-
Resignations
56 37 36 129
Separation/Resignation 41 18 16 75
Other Actions* 773 139 43 955
*Other actions include absences, conversion codes from legacy, change of pay, change of work schedule and
benefits.
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS (ZERO- VALUE CONTRACTS)
It is proposed that the following reimbursement agreements be approved for the 2014-2015 school year:
Agency Agreement Number/s
California Federation of Teachers (CFT) HR14/15-004
NCS Pearson HR14/15-011 to HR14/15-013
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) HR14/15-021 to HR14/15-027
Los Angeles Education Partnership (LAEP) HR14/15-032 to HR14/15-033
The requesting agencies will reimburse the District for all costs for salary and benefits for the temporary loan of
the employee to the agency during the period of the detached service assignment. Organization leaves are
provided under the Education Code section 44987 for elected officers for up to 12 years.
Background:
This report is presented at each Board Meeting for approval of routine personnel actions.
Expected Outcomes:
Not applicable
Specifically in regard to disciplinary action, a no vote may nullify the disciplinary action due to legal time
constraints. A no vote impacts the timeliness of processing personnel actions for classified and certificated
employees regarding their assignment, salary/rate, transfer, and new appointment and may be in conflict with
procedural rights and benefits afforded them under applicable Education Code provisions, Personnel
Commission Rules, District Policy, and respective Collection Bargaining Agreements (UTLA, AALA,
Teamsters, Los Angeles School Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association). Employees have procedural
rights that are based on their status (permanent or probationary) associated with the specific personnel action
being submitted and the respective rights available to them in accordance with the above. Additionally, based
on Personnel Commission Rules, permanent classified employees have rights to appeals.
Not applicable
powered by Legistar
57
0123456789
Budget Impact:
Cost Neutral
Not applicable
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
58
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
59
0123456789
Human ResourcesDivision
No. 465-13/14

INFORMATIVE
FROM: J usto H. Avila
Interim Chief Human Resources Officer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS
This informative providesadditional details regarding the Routine Personnel Actions outlined in Board
Report No. 465-13/14. There were 30certificated new hires during the time period covered by this report
and a summary list of hires appears below. The 30new hiresare comprised of former employees from the
rehire list or certificated employees neededin hard-to-staff subject areas. Substitute teachers were hired to
provide increased coverage capacity for teacher absencesand professional development activities.
1. COUNS, PUPIL SERV&ATTEND Counselor, Pupil Services and Attendance 1
2. ELEMENTARY TEACHER Elementary Teacher 1
3. SCHOOL NURSE School Nurse 2
4. SECONDARY TEACHER Secondary Teacher 4
5. SOCIAL WKR,PSYTRC Social Worker, Psychiatric 3
6. SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER Special Education Teacher 1
7. TCHR,EL,SUB,D-D Teacher, Elementary, Substitute, Day-to-Day 9
8. TCHR,S,SUB,D-D Teacher, Secondary, Substitute, Day-to-Day 9
If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 16131.
J HA:yv
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
60
0123456789
No. 465-13/14
For 6-10-14Board Meeting
Personnel Commission
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: J une 10, 2014
FROM: J analyn W. Glymph, Ph.D.
Personnel Director
SUBJECT: NUMBER OF ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS
This informative addresses the number of classified personnel hire actions on the Board of
Education Routine Personnel Actions Report for the J une 10, 2014meeting.
The following table represents a breakdown of the new hire, reassignment, and rehire
actions for the J une 10, 2014board report for the period of April 23, 2014 to May 16,
2014.
Hire Data:
As presented in the table below, the total number of classified hire actions for the period of
April 23, 2014 to May 16, 2014 is 419, of which 292(70%) are rehires or reassignments,
and 127(30%) are new hires.
With the exception of 118assignments, all of the actions are for positions which are
school-based or provide direct support to the schools or their operations. Teacher
Assistant positions, although unclassified, are included in the data as they are indicated as
classified in the BTS system and they are processed by the Personnel Commission.
All new hires toregular/permanent positions are for A B, C, or E basis positions. The new
hires consist of aBuilding and Grounds Worker (5), Heavy Truck Driver, Maintenance
Worker (10), Mechanical Engineer, Microcomputer Support Assistant (6), NET Developer
(2), School Facilities Attendant (Female) (Restricted) (2), School Facilities Attendant
(Restricted) (3), School Occupational Therapy Assistant, Senior Food Service Worker,
Sign Language Interpreter, and Stock Worker.
The following regular/permanent positions have been filled by promotional employees:
Accounting Analyst, Assistant Plant Manager I, Assistant Plant Manager II, Associate
Computer Application Specialist, Building and Grounds Worker (2), Credentials and
Contracts Assistant, Health Care Assistant (2), Information Technology Project Manager,
IT Customer Services Support Representative (2), IT Field Services Technician ,
Lieutenant, Maintenance Worker (5), MAXIMO Data Management Analyst,
Microcomputer Support Assistant (2), Mobile Device Management Specialist, Plant
61
0123456789
Manager I, Principal Administrative Analyst, Senior Administrative Analyst, Senior Food
Service Worker, Senior IT LAN Technician, Sergeant, Special Education Assistant (7),
Staff Assistant to Board Members II, Staff Assistant to Board Members III, andStock
Worker.
62
0123456789
Hire Data of All Classified and Teacher Assistant Employees
From April 23, 2014 to May 16, 2014
By New Hire, Reassignment, and Rehire
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
NEW HIRE
Administrative Intern I * 1 1
Athletics Assistant 6 6
Building and Grounds Worker 5 2 7
Campus Aide & Restricted 7 7
Educational Resource Aide (Restricted) 1 1
Examining Assistant I* 1 1
Food Service Worker 1 26 27
Heavy Truck Driver 1 1
Human Resources Intern* 1 1
Library Aide 1 1
Maintenance Worker 3 1 4
Maintenance Worker* 7 7
Mechanical Engineer* 1 1
Microcomputer Support Assistant 2 1 3
Microcomputer Support Assistant* 4 4
NET Developer* 2 2
Outdoor Education Assistant (Male) 1 1
School Facilities Attendant (Female)
(Restricted) 2 2
School Facilities Attendant (Restricted) 3 3
School Occupational Therapy Assistant 1 1
Senior Food Service Worker 1 1
Sign Language Interpreter 1 1
Special Education Trainee 4 4
Stock Worker 1 1
Teacher Assistant - Degree Track 39 39
New Hire Total 34 8 1 44 40 127
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Accounting Analyst* 1 1 2
Administrative Analyst* 1 1 2
Architectural Associate* 1 1
Area Bus Supervisor 1 1
Assistant Plant Manager I 1 4 5
63
0123456789
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Assistant Plant Manager II 1 1
Associate Computer Application
Specialist* 1 1
Branch Human Resources Manager* 1 1
Budget Technician* 1 1
Building and Grounds Worker 14 14
Campus Aide & Restricted 2 1 3
Carpenter* 1 1
Clerk 1 1
Credentials and Contracts Assistant* 1 1
Customer Services Center
Representative* 2 2
Deputy Chief Financial Officer* 1 1
Director of Treasury* 1 1
Early Education Center Aide I &
(Restricted) 1 1 2
Financial Analyst * 3 1 4
Financial Manager 3 3
Fiscal Services Manager* 1 1 2
Food Service Manager I 3 3
Food Service Manager II 3 3
Food Service Manager IV 1 1
Food Service Manager V 2 2 4
Food Service Manager VI 1 1
Food Service Manager VII 1 1
Food Service Training Specialist 1 1
Food Service Worker 33 2 35
Health Care Assistant 4 2 6
Health Office Clerk 1 1
Human Resources Representative* 2 2
Human Resources Specialist II* 1 1
Information Technology Project Manager* 1 1
Instructional Aide for the Deaf & Hard of
Hearing Students-Signing 1 1
IT Customer Services Support
Representative* 2 2
IT Field Services Technician I* 1 1
Legal Secretary* 1 1
Lieutenant 1 1
Light Bus Driver 1 1
Maintenance Worker 2 1 3
MAXIMO Data Management Analyst* 1 1
64
0123456789
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Microcomputer Support Assistant* 2 2
Mobile Device Management Specialist* 1 1
Office Technician 4 4
Office Technician (CPOS)* 1 1
Office Technician* 1 1
Payroll Specialist III* 1 1
Plant Manager I 2 3 5
Plant Manager II 1 1 2
Plant Manager III* 1 1
Principal Administrative Analyst* 1 1
Principal Financial Analyst* 1 1
Program and Policy Development
Advisor, Intensive Support and
Intervention* 1 1
Program Associate L* 1 1
Regional Transportation Manager* 1 1
Satellite Food Service Manager 10 5 15
School Administrative Assistant 1 2 1 4
Secretary & (Restricted)* 1 1
Senior Accounting Analyst* 3 3
Senior Administrative Analyst* 1 1
Senior Administrative Assistant* 1 1
Senior Carpenter 1 1 2
Senior Carpenter* 1 1
Senior Food Service Worker 4 17 1 22
Senior Inventory Control Analyst* 1 1
Senior IT LAN Technician* 1 1
Senior Office Technician* 1 1
Senior Secretary* 1 1
Sergeant 1 1
Special Education Assistant 23 23
Staff Assistant to Board Members II* 1 1
Staff Assistant to Board Members III* 1 1
Stock Worker* 1 1
Supervising Microcomputer Support
Assistant* 1 1
Textbook Inventory Clerk 1 1
Transportation Planner* 1 1
Transportation Router* 5 5
WAN Specialist II* 1 1
Window/Wall Washer 1 1
Reassignment Total 48 152 2 1 14 29 246
65
0123456789
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REHIRE
Building and Grounds Worker 2 2
Campus Aide & Restricted 1 1
Food Service Worker 11 11
Housekeeper 1 1
Insurance Representative I* 1 1
Office Technician 1 1 2
School Facilities Attendant (Female)
(Restricted) 1 1
Special Education Assistant 2 1 3
Stock Worker* 1 1
Rehire Total 12 1 24 9 46
Grand Total 48 198 11 2 82 78 419
*non-school based
Summary
Temporary and Substitute employees are often needed for short periods of time to assume
responsibilities for regular employees when they are unavailable; they are not intended to replace
regular employees for an extended period of time. Positions for several classifications, such as
Education Aides and Instructional Aides, are typically filled by restricted status employees.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
J WG 06/10/14
66
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

C
O
N
F
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

-

R
E
D
A
C
T
E
D
67
0123456789
TAB 5
Approval of Non-Routine Personnel Actions
Action Proposed:
It is proposed that the following non-routine personnel actions be approved:
CLASSIFIED
Dismissals
1. EN 661372 from permanent Building and Grounds Worker effective at the close of
June 11, 2014.
2. EN 724205 from permanent Plumber effective at the close of June 11, 2014.
3. EN 794573 from permanent Special Education Assistant effective at the close of
June 11, 2014.
Suspension-Dismissals
4. EN 730830 from permanent Special Education Trainee. Suspension from May 13, 2014 through
June 11, 2014; dismissal effective at the close of June 11, 2014.
5. EN 756839 from permanent Special Education Assistant. Suspension from May 13, 2014 through
6. EN 763975 from permanent Special Education Assistant. Suspension from May 13, 2014 through
7. EN 778537 from permanent Building and Grounds Worker. Suspension from May 13, 2014 through
Rescission of Dismissal
8. Previous Reference: Board of Education Report No. 090-13/14 11-12-13 regarding dismissal of
EN 798537 from permanent Building and Grounds Worker effective at the close of November 13, 2013.
Rescind dismissal of EN 798537 and accept resignation from District service effective at the close of
November 13, 2013.
Rescission of Suspension-Dismissals
powered by Legistar
113
0123456789
9. Previous Reference: Board of Education Report No. 046-13/14 10-1-13 regarding suspension-
dismissal of EN 719154 from permanent Special Education Trainee. Suspension from September 3,
2013 through October 2, 2013; dismissal effective at the close of October 2, 2013.
Rescind dismissal of EN 719154 and make whole in lost wages, benefits, and seniority as ordered by
the Personnel Commission on April 14, 2014.
10. Previous Reference: Board of Education Report No. 046-13/14 10-1-13 regarding suspension-
dismissal of EN 731363 from permanent Early Education Center Aide I. Suspension from September 3,
2013 through October 2, 2013; dismissal effective at the close of October 2, 2013.
Rescind dismissal of EN 731363 and accept resignation from District service effective at the close of
October 2, 2013.
Background:
This report is presented at each Board Meeting for approval of non-routine personnel actions.
Expected Outcomes:
Not applicable
Specifically in regard to disciplinary action, a no vote may nullify the disciplinary action due to legal time
constraints. A no vote impacts the timeliness of processing personnel actions for classified and certificated
employees regarding their assignment, salary/rate, transfer, and new appointment and may be in conflict with
procedural rights and benefits afforded them under applicable Education Code provisions, Personnel
Commission Rules, District Policy, and respective Collective Bargaining Agreements (UTLA, AALA,
Teamsters, Los Angeles School Police Association, Service Employees International Union, Local 99,
California School Employees Association, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades
Council, Los Angeles School Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association). Employees have procedural
rights that are based on their status (permanent or probationary) associated with the specific personnel action
being submitted and the respective rights available to them in accordance with the above. Additionally, based
on Personnel Commission Rules, permanent classified employees have rights to appeals.
Not applicable
Budget Impact:
No budget impact
Not applicable
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
114
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

C
O
N
F
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

-

R
E
D
A
C
T
E
D
117
0123456789
TAB 6
Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS Side Letter Agreement with Los
Angeles Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council (Unit E)
Action Proposed:
The Board of Education adopts the attached Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards
CALPERS Side Letter Agreement between Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and Los Angeles
Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council (Unit E). The Side Letter Agreement is presented
to the Board as a joint recommendation by the two parties.
Background:
The Los Angeles Unified School District reached agreement with Unit E on May 8, 2014, and prepared the
attached Side Letter Agreement concerning the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) Towards the
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS).
Expected Outcomes:
Adoption of the attached Side Letter will result in employees paying one hundred percent (100%) of their
individual employee contribution to the California Public Employees Retirement System and receiving an
offset due to the elimination of EPMC. for eligible bargaining Unit E members.
Adopt the attached Side Letter Agreement resulting in employees paying one hundred percent (100%) of their
offset due to the elimination of EPMC.
Do not adopt the attached Side Letter Agreement and the current contractual language will remain which may
not be in accordance with statutory changes.
The Side Letter Agreement will become policy upon adoption.
Budget Impact:
The proposed 1.2% general wage increase to base salary in order to offset the EPMC results in an ongoing
expenditure increase to the District of approximately $0.23 million annually. The estimated share of general
fund is approximately $ 0.18 million annually.
This Side Letter Agreement addresses recent changes to CalPERS under the Public Employee Pension Reform
Act of 2013 (PEPRA) in which all CalPers eligible Bargaining Unit Employees should pay 100% of his/her
individual employee contribution to CalPERS.
powered by Legistar
200
0123456789
Attachments:
Attachment A: Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS Side Letter agreement
Attachment B: AB 1200 Report
Informatives:
None.
powered by Legistar
201
0123456789
202
0123456789
TAB 7
Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS Side Letter Agreement with
Associated Administrators of Los Angeles for Unit J
Action Proposed:
CALPERS Side Letter Agreement between Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and Associated
Administrators of Los Angeles (AALA) for Unit J. The Side Letter Agreement is presented to the Board as a
joint recommendation by the two parties.
Background:
The Los Angeles Unified School District reached agreement with AALA on May 16, 2014, and prepared the
Expected Outcomes:
offset due to the elimination of EPMC. for eligible bargaining Unit J members
Budget Impact:
powered by Legistar
203
0123456789
Attachments:
Informatives:
None.
powered by Legistar
204
0123456789
205
0123456789
TAB 8
Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS Side Letter Agreement with
California School Employees Association for Unit D
Action Proposed:
CALPERS Side Letter Agreement between Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and California
School Employees Association (CSEA) for Unit D. The Side Letter Agreement is presented to the Board as a
joint recommendation by the two parties.
Background:
The Los Angeles Unified School District reached agreement with CSEA on May 22, 2014, and prepared the
Expected Outcomes:
offset due to the elimination of EPMC for eligible bargaining Unit D members.
The Side Letter Agreement will become policy upon adoption by the Board subject to CSEA Policy 610
regarding ratification.
Budget Impact:
Attachments:
powered by Legistar
206
0123456789
Informatives:
None
powered by Legistar
207
0123456789
208
0123456789
TAB 9
Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS Side Letter Agreement with Los
Angeles School Police Association (LASPA)
Action Proposed:
CALPERS Side Letter Agreement between Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and Los Angeles
School Police Association (LASPA). The Side Letter Agreement is presented to the Board as a joint
recommendation by the two parties.
Background:
The Los Angeles Unified School District reached agreement with LASPA on May 20, 2014, and prepared the
Expected Outcomes:
offset due to the elimination of EPMC for eligible bargaining LASPA members.
Budget Impact:
For non-sworn officers, the proposed 7% general wage increase to base salary in order to offset the EPMC
results in an ongoing expenditure increase to the District of approximately $0.04 million annually. The
estimated share of general fund is approximately $ 0.04 million annually.
For sworn officers, the proposed 9% general wage increase to base salary in order to offset the EPMC results in
an ongoing expenditure increase to the District of approximately $0.76 million annually. The estimated share
of general fund is approximately $ 0.75 million annually.
powered by Legistar
209
0123456789
Attachments:
Informatives:
None.
powered by Legistar
210
0123456789
211
0123456789
TAB 10
Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) Towards CalPERS for District Represented Employees
Action Proposed:
The Board of Education approve similar provisions for District represented employees similar to those in
bargaining units related to the Employer Paid Member Contribution Towards CALPERS.
Background:
The Los Angeles Unified School District has reached agreement on the subject of Employer Paid Member
Contributions with other bargaining units who have District represented counterparts.
Expected Outcomes:
Adoption will result in employees paying one hundred percent (100%) of their individual employee
contribution to the California Public Employees Retirement System and receiving an offset due to the
elimination of EPMC.
Adoption resulting in employees paying one hundred percent (100%) of their individual employee contribution
to the California Public Employees Retirement System and receiving an offset due to the elimination of
EPMC.
Do not adopt and the current practice will remain which may not be in accordance with statutory changes.
This will become policy upon adoption by the Board.
Budget Impact:
The proposed general wage increase to base salary in order to offset the EPMC results in an ongoing
This Agreement addresses recent changes to CalPERS under the Public Employee Pension Reform Act of 2013
(PEPRA) in which all CalPERS eligible employees should pay 100% of his/her individual employee
contribution to CalPERS.
Attachments:
Attachment A: AB 1200 Report
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
212
0123456789
TAB 11
Districts Initial Bargaining Proposals for All Certificated and Classified Bargaining Units
Action Proposed:
Adoption of the Districts Initial Bargaining Proposals for Collective Bargaining negotiations with Los Angeles
School Police Association (Unit A), Service Employees International Union, Local 99 (Units B, C, F, and G),
California School Employees Association (Unit D), Los Angeles School Police Management Association (Unit
H), Los Angeles Orange Counties Building & Construction Trades Council (Unit E), AALA Classified
Management (Unit J), Teamsters Local Union 572 (Unit S), Associated Administrators Los Angeles (AALA),
and United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA).
Background:
Government Code Section 3540 et seq and the Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA) obligates
public school employers and exclusive representatives to present their initial negotiating proposals to the public
and to provide an opportunity for public expression on such proposals. The practices contained in this bulletin
are designed to implement Government Code Section 3547 (Public Notice) of the EERA.
Expected Outcomes:
Adoption of the Districts Initial Bargaining Proposals for Collective Bargaining negotiations.
Adopt the Districts Initial Proposals (as indicated in attachment A), thereby complying with the Educational
Employment Relations Act (EERA; Government Code Section 3540 et seq. ) which provides for and establishes
requirements for collective bargaining between public school employers and employee organizations.
Do not adopt the Initial Proposals and postpone their adoption to a later date, thereby delaying collectively
bargained agreements reflective of current District goals and objectives.
As detailed in District Bulletin 6117.0 Public Notice of Negotiations Proposals (Implementation Of
Educational Employment Relations Act: Government Code Section 3547) from the Office of General
Counsel/Office of Labor Relations, conforms to Government Code Section 3540 et seq and the Educational
Employment Relations Act (EERA) requirements.
Any policy implications associated with the eventual outcome of the negotiations process with the bargaining
units will be reflected in later Board Reports.
Budget Impact:
Any budget implications associated with the eventual outcome of the negotiations process with the bargaining
units will be reflected in later Board Reports.
powered by Legistar
213
0123456789
This proposal may form the eventual basis for revisions to the Collective Bargaining Agreements. Any
subsequent new subjects for negotiations initiated by the District or by an exclusive representative of a District
bargaining unit shall be made public pursuant to Bulletin 6117.0.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Initial Proposals
Informatives:
None.
powered by Legistar
214
0123456789
1
ATTACHMENT A
2014-2015 Districts Initial Proposal for:
I. Compensation
A. Considerations: The Board of Education and the Superintendent believe
that negotiations concerning economic issues, including salaries and
health benefits, must take into account the following factors:
1. The need to support the Board of Education Vision, District Mission,
and Guiding Principles all of which depend upon the Districts
current and future fiscal health;
2. The Districts current and future limited budgetary resources,
coupled with the demands of sound fiscal practices and the
California statutes requiring balanced budgets on both a current
and a projected three-year basis;
3. The challenges threatening the immediate and long-term financial
health of the District and its employees, including the impacts of
continued declining enrollments and related losses to District
income, and also the unfunded liabilities of the District and its
employees within the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS)
and within the Districts own Health Benefits Plan, as well as other
cost items that must be controlled; and
4. The need to provide competitive total compensation (including an
appropriate balance of wages/salaries and Health Benefits/other
costs of employment), in order to attract and retain effective
employees.
B. Salary Increases: Despite the above challenges, and the Districts
inability as of yet to identify the necessary supporting revenue increases
or cost-reduction measures to fund the following salary adjustments, the
District is committed to a well-deserved salary increase for all District
employees, now that the State appears to be beginning its recovery from
the Recession. The District is willing to offer the following salary increases:
First, a 2% off-schedule, salary payment, on a one-time basis, based upon
and limited to all actual 2013-14 earnings paid on base salary tables; and
Second, a 2% on-schedule general salary increase for the 2014-15 school
year only, shall be applied to all base salary tables.
215
0123456789
2
II. Wellness: Develop a Wellness Program to improve health and wellness, raise
productivity and reduce costs. Consider options to improve attendance and to
meet the personal needs of employees along with the operational and
instructional needs of the District and its students.
III. Performance: Increase the role of performance, competencies and experience
when making decisions that impact the instructional program and District
operations.
IV. Evaluations: Review and discuss Evaluation Procedures, in order to improve
the quality of employee services, development and accountability, and to improve
and incentivize the quality of educational and other service programs of the
District.
V. Operational Efficiencies: The District will propose efficiencies where
necessary. For example, the District will negotiate to reduce the complexity of
current pay practices, improve fairness and efficiency, reduce overpayments, and
improve coordination with the Districts payroll system.
VI. Additional Proposals: As additional subjects for negotiations may arise
subsequent to Board adoption of the above initial proposals, the District shall
provide notice thereof to the public by placing copies of any such additional
proposals in the appropriate Initial Proposals folders located in the main lobby of
District headquarters, where they shall be made available upon request to any
persons wishing to review them.
VII. Term of Agreement: The District proposes three-year agreements covering
2014-15 and the two succeeding years (with automatic extension thereafter
pending rights of termination by either party), with limited reopener provisions to
cover the second and third of such years, relating to salaries, benefits and two
other subject matters to be identified by each side.
m:\aa-data\board reports\all unions\compensation language.docx
216
0123456789
TAB 12
Delegations of Authority for Procurement and Facilities Contracts
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes the Board of Education approve the renewal of the updated delegations of authority for
Procurement and Facilities Contracts set forth in Attachment A (District Delegation Forms), with an effective
date of July 1, 2014. All proposed updated delegations do not have a sunset date.
Background:
On April 16, 2013 (Board Report No. 200-12/13), the Board of Education approved Delegations of Authority
for Procurement (including Facilities Contracts) for a one-year period, through June 30, 2014. The delegations
of authority set forth in Attachment A renew updated delegations of authority.
Expected Outcomes:
Renewal of the attached delegations of authority will enable the LAUSD to continue to award, manage and
enforce contracts in support of the Districts Operational and Facilities programs, while reducing administrative
effort, time and costs.
Approving the renewal of the attached delegations will enable the District to expedite contract actions and
obtain the highest quality services and materials at the lowest possible cost, without loss of accountability. All
delegated actions will continue to be submitted to the Board for ratification in accord with the California
Education Code, Government Code, Public Contract Code and all other applicable statutory provisions.
This action supports the Boards initiatives to streamline processes, enhance efficiency, and reduce
expenditures.
Budget Impact:
Approving the renewal of the attached delegations of authority will allow the District to continue to award,
manage and enforce contracts in support of the LAUSDs building and modernization, and operational
programs, while reducing administrative effort, time and costs. Delaying these actions while waiting for future
Board approval for projects already approved by the Board needlessly decreases efficiency and increases
administrative, project and legal costs.
Approving the renewal of the attached delegations of authority will allow the District to reduce administrative
burden, time and costs, and continue following best practices. This allows the District to obtain the highest
quality services and materials at the lowest costs.
powered by Legistar
217
0123456789
Attachments:
Attachment "A" - District Delegation Forms for:
(1) Approval of Procurement Contract Policy, Award, Management, and Enforcement;
(2) Approval of Procurement Contracts; and
(3) Solicit Proposals and Conduct a Price Discovery Auction for Utilities, Goods, and Services.
powered by Legistar
218
0123456789
[ ] Fiscal Delegation (to enter contracts) Del. No. [ 002 ]
[ ] Operational Delegation (to perform a non-fiscal operation)
To Be Completed By the Board Secretariat Only:
Board Approval: [ ] Yes [ ] No Board Approval Date: __________________
Bd. of Ed Rpt No. 474-13/14 Board of Education
J une 10, 2014
Page 1of 5
ATTACHMENT A
DISTRICT DELEGATION FORM
Requesting Division: OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND FACILITIES SERVICES DIVISION
Select One: [ ] NEW DELEGATION [X ] AMENDED DELEGATION
Date: J une 10, 2014 Board Report No.: 474-13/14
Delegation No.: Amendment No.: 5
DESIRED TEXT OF DELEGATION (Underline amended language if applicable)
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT POLICY, AWARD, MANAGEMENT, AND
ENFORCEMENT (Procurement Contracts) April 16, 2013J une 10, 2014.
Delegation of authority to the Superintendent, or his or her designee who shall have authority to
further delegate to another employee of the LAUSD, to create and implement procedures, advertise,
issue requests for qualification and proposal, negotiate, evaluate, award, execute, commence and
continue performance of, enforce, authorize payments under, amend, exercise options, and terminate
(whether by default or convenience) Procurement contracts(including Facilities contracts), as
described below, subject to and in accordance with California Public Contract Code, California
Education Code, California Government Code, and any other statutory provisionsas applicable
including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) to establish contractor and vendor prequalification requirements and procedures; to make
contractor prequalification determinations; to reject bids or proposals; to declare bidders non-
responsive or non-responsible; to release low bidder and award to the next lowest responsible,
responsive bidder; and to release or assess payment against bid bonds;
(ii) to act as hearing officer to conduct and render decisions regarding the procurement and
enforcement of Procurement contracts, including, without limitation, bid protests, bid appeals,
contractor responsibility hearings, subcontractor substitution hearings; provided, the Board of
Education shall be given written notification of any decision rendered by the hearing officer
within 5 business days followingthe issuance of such decision;
(iii) to review, analyze and respond to claims and petitions for leave to present late claims
presented to LAUSD pursuant to Government Code section 900 et seq.;

(iv) to withhold contract payments and penalties fromcontractors who fail to comply withcontract
terms and conditions;
(v) to establish and assess appropriate penalties or other permitted sanctions for contractor
violations of the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act of the California Public
219
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
Page 2of 5

Contract Code and to make recommendations for penalties and other permitted sanctions
to the Department of Industrial Relations for contractor violations of the California Labor
Code;
(vi) to approve change orders within the limits set forth in California Public Contract Codesection
20118.4;
(vii) to issue noticesto proceed or other documents necessary tocommence contract performance
and to file notices of completion or cessation;
(viii) to retain a percent of payment for completed work as required by current statute and torelease
retention upon a determination that the contract has been completed satisfactorily and a notice
of completion is filed with the county;
(ix) to arbitrate contract matters and pay arbitration awards not to exceed $25,000 per disputed
amount;
(x) to authorize payments of liquidated damages assessed against the District or to assess
liquidated damages against a contractor pursuant to contract terms, and to authorize payments
of interest and penalties pursuant to contract terms or the California Public Contract Code;
(xi) to award or assess payment against performance bonds;
(xii) to approve assignment of contract money to a surety which has invoked its right of assignment
under its indemnity agreement with the contractor;
(xiii) to sell, lease, or dispose of all personal property that is surplus, obsolete or not suitable for
school use in accordance with applicable law;
(xiv) to sell Los Angeles Unified School District published materials, not to exceed $10,000 per sale,
to any person, political subdivision, public officer or agency or educational institution;
(xv) to issueDistrict approved credit cards i.e., P-cards and Buyer Travel cards;
(xvi) to purchase, as needed, the following items essential to the operation of the District where a
competitive selection for an equivalent source or product is not available:
a. Bus Pass/MTA tokens
b. Institutional membership renewals (e.g., National Association of School Boards)
c. School/LAUSD accreditation (e.g., Western Association of Schools and Colleges)
d. Renewal subscription fees (e.g., software license renewal, maintenance of leased
equipment)
220
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
Page 3of 5
e. Student testing
f. Postage
g. Waste fees as associated with the Office of Environmental Health and Safety
h. Advance payments to utilities
i. Shipping and handling charges
j. Utility fees
(xvii) tomake purchases through piggyback contracts within the authority limits defined hereinin
accordance with procurement law.
Select One: [ ] NEW DELEGATION [ X] AMENDED DELEGATION
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS
(Procurement Contracts) April 16, 2013J une 10, 2014.
Delegation of authority to the Superintendent, or his or her designee who shall have authority to
further delegate to another employee of the LAUSD to create and implement procedures, advertise,
issue requests for qualification and proposal, negotiate, evaluate, award, execute, commence and
continue performance of, enforce, authorize payments under, amend, exercise options, and terminate
(whether by default or convenience) with respect to the following Procurement contracts(including
Facilities contracts), as describedbelow:
(i) Architectural and Engineering Services
Contracts for architectural and engineering services for approved Facilities projects so long as
such contracts do not impose costs upon the District in excess of the applicable Board-
approved project budget.
(ii) Professional Services (Excluding Architectural and Engineering)
Contracts, exercising existing options or amendments, for all other professional services (other
than architectural and engineering services) up to $250,000 for a single contract action for
221
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
Page 4of 5
approved projects with cumulative contract actions for a single Division with a single
contractor not to exceed $500,000 in a 12-month period.
(iii) Construction
Contracts for construction as permitted by and in accordance with the California Public
Contract Code and California Education Code (including, without limitation, publicly bid
contracts, job order contracts, informal A and B letter agreements, and takeover and completion
contracts) up to $85 million per contract for approved Facilities projects.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the authority to execute contracts pursuant to California
Education Code section 17515 (joint occupancy) is expressly excluded from this delegation
of authority, and contracts pursuant to California Education Code section 17406 (best value)
shall be limited to $10 million per contract.
(iv) Supply Contracts and General Services
Contracts for supplies, materials, equipment and other personal property up to $250,000 or for
contracts that do not impose costs upon the District in excess of the applicable Board-approved
program or project budget authority.
(v) Special One-Time Delegated Authority
Contracts for the procurement of regular Distribution Center materiel of furniture, office
essentials, custodial/maintenance & operations, paper, visual arts, educational supplies/tools,
science/home economics/first aide, audio visual, athletic equipment, forms & publications, and
music which do not exceed a total of 75% of the average annual expenditures per fiscal year.
(vi) Special Services and Other Services
Contracts for special services and other services specified by Government Code section 53060
or similar authority up to $250,000 per action.
(vii) Miscellaneous
Contracts under which the District will receive no more than $500,000 in exchange for or in
recognition of services or products provided by the District.
Single/Sole source contracts in amounts not to exceed the value of the relevant grant for each
vendor that is indentified as the Districts exclusive partner in the grant.
Authority to enter into other single/sole source contracts with a single entity up to $1 million
subject to applicable law. This authority shall not be delegated below the Chief Facilities
Executive or Chief Operating Officer level.
Contracts and other instruments, invoices, and obligations not otherwise covered by items (i)
through (vii) above up to $25,000 per action. This delegation shall include the authority to take
or authorize actions necessary for or incidental to the foregoing contract authority, provided
222
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
Page 5of 5
such actions are routine ministerial actions, relatively minor transactions, or nonsubstantive
matters.
Select One: [ ] NEW DELEGATION [ X ] AMENDED DELEGATION
SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND CONDUCT A PRICE DISCOVERY AUCTION FOR
UTILITIES, GOODS, AND SERVICES
(Procurement Contracts) April 16, 2013J une 10, 2014.
Delegation of authority to the Superintendent, or his or her designee, who shall have authority
to further delegate to another employee of the LAUSD, to conduct a competitive price
discovery auction or a similar process utilizing transparent and objective selection criteria to
receive a real-time market quote on electricity, natural gas and/or any other type of energy or
for goods and services, and to enter into acontract with the lowest responsible bidder if such
contract is expected to result in cost savings to the District as compared to current
goods/services from the local utility or through other procurement options.
PRIOR AMENDMENTS: Date Amendment No. Board Report No.
J une 12, 2007 1 421 06/07
J une 21, 2011 2 356-10/11
April 10, 2012 3 211 11/12
April 16, 2013 4 200 12/13
______________________________________
Signature Signature
Yvette Merriman-Garrett
Division Head/Sr. Administrator (Print Name) Office of the Board Secretariat (Print Name)
May 23, 2014
Date Submitted Date Received
223
0123456789
TAB 13
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve the
Alteration and Improvement and Board Member Priority Projects
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education approve an amendment to the Facilities Services Division (FSD)
Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approve eleven Alteration and Improvement (A&I) and Board
Member Priority (BMP) projects (as listed on Attachment A), and authorize the Chief Facilities Executive,
and/or his designee, to make any purchases associated with these projects. The total combined budget for these
projects is $404,916.
Background:
In accordance with the Maintenance and Operations Weighted Allocation Formula, local Bond Measures
K, R and Y funds have been allocated to Board-Prioritized Facilities Programs for A&I and BMP projects.
Projects are developed at the discretion of the Board District or Educational Service Center with support
from Facilities Services Division staff and input from school administrators. All projects must be capital in
nature and adhere to bond language and laws.
The projects proposed in this Board Report will upgrade, modernize and/or enhance the learning
environment for students. The projects include various modernization, technology, security upgrade and
repair scopes of work. Project scopes, schedules and budgets within these categories may vary depending
on site conditions and needs.
Expected Outcomes:
Execution of these projects will help improve the learning environment for students, teachers and staff.
A yes vote will allow staff to execute the projects listed on Attachment A. Failure to approve this
proposed action will delay the projects and ultimately the anticipated benefit to the schools and their
students.
The requested actions are consistent with the Board-Prioritized Facilities Programs for A&I and BMP projects
and the Districts commitment to address unmet school facilities needs and provide students with a safe and
healthy learning environment.
Budget Impact:
The total combined budget for the eleven projects is $404,916. Eight projects are funded by BMP funds.
The remaining three projects are funded by A&I Funds. All projects are funded with Bond Program funds
earmarked specifically for these programs.
This report includes many time-sensitive, small to medium-sized projects that have been deemed critical by
powered by Legistar
224
0123456789
Board Members and/or Administrators of Operations and school administrators.
Bond Oversight Committee Recommendations:
These items were considered by the School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee (BOC) at its
meeting on May 29, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed FSD-SEP amendment will help facilitate
implementation of the FSD-SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to
successfully complete the FSD-SEP.
Attachments:
Attachment A
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
225
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-
-

B
O
A
R
D

M
E
M
B
E
R

P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y

A
N
D

A
L
T
E
R
A
T
I
O
N

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
B
D
E
S
C
S
c
h
o
o
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

F
u
n
d
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

B
u
d
g
e
t
A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

S
t
a
r
t

A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n

3
N
o
r
t
h
L
a
n
k
e
r
s
h
i
m

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

a
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

a
n
d

l
i
b
r
a
r
y

b
y

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

s
o
u
n
d

a
n
d

v
i
s
u
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m
.

B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
4
8
,
3
1
7
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
3
N
o
r
t
h
L
o
c
k
h
u
r
s
t

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

a
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

b
y

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

s
o
u
n
d

a
n
d

v
i
s
u
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m
.

B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
1
6
,
4
1
6
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
3
N
o
r
t
h
H
a
y
n
e
s

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

a
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

b
y

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

s
o
u
n
d

a
n
d

v
i
s
u
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m
.

B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
2
,
9
5
3
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
3
N
o
r
t
h
L
u
l
l

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
U
p
g
r
a
d
e

r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s

t
o

a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e

n
e
w

s
t
u
d
e
n
t

p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

a
n
d

d
a
t
a

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

6

c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
a
l
l

6

s
m
a
r
t
b
o
a
r
d
s
.
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s
$
2
0
,
0
7
5
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
6
N
o
r
t
h
V
e
n
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
S
A
u
g
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

u
p
g
r
a
d
e

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

u
n
d
e
r
s
i
z
e
d

l
i
b
r
a
r
y

t
o

a

n
e
w

l
a
r
g
e
r

l
i
b
r
a
r
y

w
i
t
h

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

o
f

H
e
a
r
t

o
f

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
.

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s

a

n
e
w

p
a
s
s

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

a
t

s
h
a
r
e
d

w
a
l
l
,

r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
s

e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

r
a
c
e
w
a
y
s
,

c
o
n
d
u
i
t
s
,

a
n
d

s
w
i
t
c
h
e
s
.

A
c
c
e
p
t

d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

l
a
b
o
r

a
n
d

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s

t
o

r
e
p
l
a
c
e

f
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
,

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

n
e
w

p
a
i
n
t
,

i
n
s
t
a
l
l

n
e
w

c
a
b
i
n
e
t
r
y
,

t
a
c
k
a
b
l
e

s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
,

a
n
d

s
h
e
l
v
i
n
g
.

A
c
c
e
p
t

d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

i
P
a
d
s

a
n
d

o
t
h
e
r

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r

e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t

v
a
l
u
e
d

i
n

e
x
c
e
s
s

o
f

$
2
5
,
0
0
0

t
o

b
e

a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d

c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

B
u
l
l
e
t
i
n

N
o
.

C
-
6
6
.

A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Q
2
-
2
0
1
4
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
2
I
S
I
C
R
F
K

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

s
a
f
e
t
y

a
n
d

s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

b
y

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a

p
a
n
e
l
s

a
n
d

a

s
a
f
e
t
y

f
e
n
c
e

o
n

t
h
e

3
r
d

f
l
o
o
r

b
r
i
d
g
e

l
e
v
e
l
.
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s
$
1
9
,
9
4
7
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
5
E
a
s
t
C
i
t
y

T
e
r
r
a
c
e

E
S
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
'
s

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

b
y

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

l
a
p
t
o
p

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
.
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
5
,
8
4
7
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
B
d
.

o
f

E
d

R
p
t

N
o
.

4
9
1
-
1
3
/
1
4

P
a
g
e

1

o
f

2
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
226
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-
-

B
O
A
R
D

M
E
M
B
E
R

P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y

A
N
D

A
L
T
E
R
A
T
I
O
N

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
B
D
E
S
C
S
c
h
o
o
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

F
u
n
d
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

B
u
d
g
e
t
A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

S
t
a
r
t

A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n

5
S
o
u
t
h

B
r
y
s
o
n

E
S
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
'
s

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

b
y

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

l
a
p
t
o
p

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
.
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
5
,
8
4
7
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
7
S
o
u
t
h

C
a
b
r
i
l
l
o

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

c
a
m
p
u
s

b
y

r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

m
a
r
q
u
e
e

a
n
d

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

m
a
r
q
u
e
e
.
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
7
,
2
5
8
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
7
S
o
u
t
h

D
o
d
s
o
n

M
S
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
'
s

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

b
y

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

l
a
p
t
o
p

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
.
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
5
,
8
4
7
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
7
S
o
u
t
h

S
o
u
t
h

S
h
o
r
e
s

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

c
a
m
p
u
s

b
y

r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

m
a
r
q
u
e
e

a
n
d

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

m
a
r
q
u
e
e
.
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
4
7
,
4
0
9
Q
3
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
T
o
t
a
l

$
4
0
4
,
9
1
6
B
d
.

o
f

E
d

R
p
t

N
o
.

4
9
1
-
1
3
/
1
4

P
a
g
e

2

o
f

2
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
227
0123456789
228
0123456789
229
0123456789
TAB 14
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve a
Library / Multi-purpose Room Project at William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High School
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education amend the Facilities Services Division (FSD) Strategic Execution
Plan (SEP) to define and approve a library/multi-purpose room project at William Tell Aggeler Opportunity
High School (Aggeler High School), and allocate $394,885 in Bond Program funds earmarked specifically for
school upgrades and reconfigurations to support specialized instructional programs to the project to ensure
successful completion. The total project budget is $2,002,390, which is funded primarily by third party
funding.
The proposed project consists of the following:
A new adaptive metal building structure that includes a library, multi-purpose room and restrooms;
Installation of a District-owned modular restroom building;
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades;
Site upgrades necessary to enable safe and efficient operation of the campus, such as a new entrance
gate, signage and fencing.
The proposed project is physically located in Board District 3 (Galatzan) and Educational Service Center North.
Construction is anticipated to begin in Q1-2016 and to be completed in Q3-2016.
Background:
The Israel Baran Trust named the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) as beneficiary to an
inheritance of $1,518,187 and with BOE #151-08/09, the LAUSD Board of Education accepted this donation.
With accumulated interest, the funding available for this project is $1,607,505. Under the provisions of the
Trust, the funds must be used solely and exclusively for the construction of a library and/or a multi-purpose
room on the grounds of Aggeler High School.
In order to provide the high school with the improvements desired by the Trust, additional upgrades and/or
mitigations are necessary to ensure compliance with local, state, and/or federal facilities requirements,
including ADA and Division of the State Architect. These additional requirements necessitate the allocation of
Bond Program funding in order to execute the project. The project scope was developed by FSD, in
collaboration with the school principal and representatives from Board District.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of the proposed action will allow staff to undertake a project at Aggeler High School that will provide
a new adaptive metal building structure that includes a library, multi-purpose room and restrooms. Approval
will also enable the District to use the inheritance received from the Israel Baran Trust in accordance with the
relevant provisions of that trust.
powered by Legistar
230
0123456789
If the Board approves the proposed action, staff will proceed with the design and subsequent construction of
upgrades to the campus that will provide a new library, multi-purpose room and restrooms.
If the Board does not approve the proposed action, the proposed project will not be executed. Additionally, the
inheritance received by the District would be placed at risk.
The requested action does not change current District policies.
Budget Impact:
The budget for this project is $2,002,390. It will be funded by $1,607,505 of third party funds and interest
received from the Israel Baran Trust, and approximately $394,885 of Bond Program funds earmarked
specifically for school upgrades and reconfigurations to support specialized instructional programs.
The Facilities Services Division has been evaluating various options for the provision of new facilities at
LAUSD school sites. One such option is the use of Division of the State Architect (DSA) approved adaptive
metal buildings.
In December of 2013, the District issued a Request for Qualifications with the intent of establishing a list of
qualified providers of these structures and one vendor, Growth Point Structures, has been identified to date.
Other vendors are actively working with DSA to gain approval of their adaptive metal buildings and additional
qualified vendors will be added to our bench as available.
This project and associated budget and schedule were developed based on the expectation that a configuration
of adaptive metal structures will be used to provide a new building that will house the library, multi-purpose
room and restrooms.
This item was considered by the School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee (BOC) at its
meeting on May 29, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed SEP amendment will help facilitate
implementation of the FSD-SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to successfully
complete the FSD-SEP.
Attachments:
None.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
231
0123456789
232
0123456789
233
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
234
0123456789
235
0123456789
236
0123456789
TAB 15
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve the Diane
Watson Career Center Project
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education amend the Facilities Services Division (FSD) Strategic Execution
Plan (SEP) to define and approve the Diane Watson Career Center project, and allocate $2,184,496 in Bond
Program funds earmarked specifically for adult and career education facilities in the School Upgrade Program
(SUP) to the project to ensure successful completion. The total project budget is $12,672,352, which is funded
primarily by non-bond sources.
The proposed project will renovate and reconfigure an existing 17,000 square foot building into an auto shop
training facility to be operated by the Division of Adult and Career Education (DACE). The auto shop will
provide high school and adult students with access to a variety of specialized hands-on and classroom
automotive training opportunities including: engine and brake repair, alignment, general mechanics, and smog
certification. The project consists of, but is not limited to:
- Eleven state-of-the-art vehicle analysis, diagnostic and repair bays
- Four classrooms
- Administrative space including an office, conference room, reception area and consultation room
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant restroom facilities
- Electrical upgrades to provide sufficient capacity for future training on electric vehicle diagnostic and
repair technology
- Closed-circuit television system
- Structural upgrades to comply with Field Act standards
This project is located in Board District 1, and physically located in Education Service Center West.
Construction of the final phase of the project began in May 2014, and is anticipated to be completed in Q4-
2014.
Background:
The Diane Watson Career Center project is located at 3833 South Crenshaw Boulevard, in the City of Los
Angeles. The building was built in 1949 and originally served as an automobile sales and service center. The
District purchased the property in 2009 in an effort to provide District students with additional specialized
hands-on technical training opportunities.
The project has been fully funded with non-bond dollars since it was initiated. Earlier this year, the project
budget increased by $1,184,496 as a result of the award of the construction contract for the final phase of the
project, and the funding strategy was updated to reflect a temporary allocation from Special Residual Reserve
funds (SAP Fund 401-9010 Functional Area 000-8500-16761). Additionally, given the potential for unforeseen
conditions that exists when upgrading and reconfiguring existing non-school buildings into a school facility, the
budget was increased by an additional $1,000,000. However given the shortage of non-bond sources, and the
powered by Legistar
237
0123456789
availability of Bond Program funds for adult and career education facilities projects made available through the
SUP (BOE #143-13/14), staff is proposing that the additional funding needed to complete this capital project be
funded with the aforementioned Bond Program funds.
Upon approval of this action, $2,184,496 of bond funds earmarked specifically for adult and career education
facilities projects in the SUP will be allocated to this project. This will allow $1,184,496 of project funds to
reimburse the LAUSD Special Residual Reserve funds that were temporarily allocated to this project (SAP
Fund 401-9010 Functional Area 000-8500-16761).
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will approve the proposed action to define the Diane Watson
Career Training Center project. The proposed action will provide high school and adult education students in
the Crenshaw community with access to a variety of specialized automotive training programs.
Approval of this proposed action will allow bond funding earmarked specifically for adult and career education
facilities in the SUP to fund a portion of the Diane Watson Career Training Center project.
If the proposed action is not approved, the remaining funding for this project would need to be paid from non-
bond sources.
The action proposed is consistent with Board-approved uses of local bond funds and its commitment to address
unmet school facilities needs and provide K-12, early education and DACE students with a safe and healthy
learning environment.
Budget Impact:
The Diane Watson Career Center project budget is $12,672,352 which includes permanent funding of
$10,487,856 from various non-bond sources. An additional $2,184,496 of permanent funding is necessary to
ensure the successful completion of this project. Approval of this action will allocate bond funds earmarked
specifically for adult and career education facilities in the SUP as permanent funding to this project and will
bring all its sources into the FSD-SEP.
The proposed project will provide high school and adult students in and around the Crenshaw community with
access to automotive training opportunities. Further, this DACE program will equip students with the skills
necessary to compete for jobs in the automotive field.
Attachments:
None.
powered by Legistar
238
0123456789
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
239
0123456789
240
0123456789
241
0123456789
TAB 16
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Cancel Projects
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education amend the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan
(SEP) to take the following actions:
Cancel 335 projects listed in Attachment A that were previously designated by the Board of Education
as unfunded projects; and
Cancel 19 projects listed in Attachment B that are currently active but for which the scope as defined is
no longer needed.
Background:
The Bond Program began in 1997 with the approval by local voters of Proposition BB and has since grown
with the passage of Statewide bonds as well as additional local bond Measures K, R, Y and Q, enabling the
Facilities Services Division to further its mission of providing healthy and safe learning environments that
support educational achievement. As the Bond Program evolved, the Board of Education approved
amendments to the Facilities Services Division SEP that reallocated bond funds to ensure the completion of
program goals or to address emerging priorities. These SEP amendments, approved periodically between 2007
and 2013, resulted in the designation of select projects as unfunded until additional funding sources could be
identified and allocated to those projects through future Board actions. The SEP amendments approved in 2012
and 2013 also cancelled projects that had been deemed unnecessary or cost prohibitive and facilitated the
implementation of the Facilities Services Division SEP by more accurately reflecting the remaining work to be
undertaken.
More recently, the Board of Education approved the establishment of the School Upgrade Program in January
2014, which will serve as the next phase of the District's Bond Program to modernize, build and repair school
facilities. The Board's action approved the overarching goals and principles, funding sources, specific
categories of need, and spending targets for the School Upgrade Program with a total allocation of
$7,852,970,000 to support the creation of future projects. The School Upgrade Program was developed with
new information about the condition of the Districts facilities from the completed capital needs assessment and
master planning effort as well as the ongoing facilities condition assessment while also taking into account the
Districts current instructional vision.
Many of the unfunded projects listed in Attachment A are no longer required because the facilities needs they
were designed to address have already been met through the completion of other bond-funded projects or the
unfunded projects do not meet the recently-approved goals and principles of the Bond Program. Any
outstanding facilities requirements from these projects will be addressed as part of the master planning effort
and/or the facilities condition assessments, which are currently underway to determine the remaining service
life of different types of school site building components, and will later be folded into the development of
projects under the School Upgrade Program.
Due to the nature of working on existing campuses, the Repair & Modernization Program adapts to changes in
powered by Legistar
242
0123456789
the operating school environment by revising projects when necessary. The active projects listed in Attachment
B are proposed for cancellation because the project scope either no longer aligns with the priorities identified
by school administrators and community stakeholders, is no longer needed due to changes in school operations,
or will be completed through other bond-funded projects at the school.
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will approve the proposed action to cancel 335 unfunded projects
in Attachment A and 19 active projects in Attachment B. Cancellation of these projects will allow the School
Upgrade Program to comprehensively review work to be pursued at school facilities to improve student health,
safety and educational quality. Approval of the proposed action will also enable staff to produce a 2014 update
to the Facilities Services Division SEP that represents the remaining funded work that will be executed as part
of the Bond Program.
If the Board approves the proposed action, staff will proceed with cancelling 335 unfunded projects and 19
active projects, thereby removing them from the Facilities Services Division SEP. Approval of this action
would also enable any remaining work requirements to be combined with the School Upgrade Programs
efforts to further modernize and repair school facilities. If the Board does not approve the proposed action, the
335 projects in Attachment A will remain unfunded, inactive, and displayed in the Unfunded Projects exhibit of
the Facilities Services Division SEP. Before projects could be executed, accurate scopes, schedules, budgets,
and additional funding sources would need to be identified and presented to the Bond Citizens' Oversight
Committee and Board of Education for each project. Additionally, without Board approval of this action, the
19 active projects in Attachment B would remain in the Facilities Services Division SEP but would be placed
on hold as the defined scope for these projects is not needed to fulfill the current objectives for the Bond
Program.
The requested action does not change current District policies.
Budget Impact:
There is no impact to the General Fund as Bond Program funds are associated with the projects included in this
proposed action. The budgets and commitments related to individual projects are being reviewed and analyzed
in order to determine the amount of funds, if any, that can be made available to the Bond Program. Should
available funding be identified, it will be returned to the Board-prioritized program associated with each
cancelled project.
The unfunded projects listed in Attachment A are organized by the four prior Board actions taken to unfund
them. The first took place on October 23, 2007, when Board of Education Report No. 112-07/08 approved the
New Construction Two-Semester Neighborhood School Program in order to achieve the goal of providing a
two-semester neighborhood school for all students. In accordance with this action, several New Construction
projects that would have further reduced overcrowding at K-12 schools, but were no longer necessary to
provide neighborhood schools operating on a two-semester calendar, became unfunded projects.
In December 2011, Board of Education Report No. 086-11/12 approved the Prioritization and Funding Strategy
for School Information Technology (IT) Network Infrastructure Upgrades. This second action reallocated bond
funds from several Bond Program areas, including selected sustainability projects and a photovoltaic
installation project belonging to the Capital Improvement Program, to fund IT network infrastructure and
equipment upgrade projects at schools with limited or no access to electronic instructional initiatives.
powered by Legistar
243
0123456789
The majority of unfunded projects were designated as such by Board of Education Report No. 201-11/12 when
it was approved on April 10, 2012. This third Board action included the cancellation of more than 600 projects
as well as moved 285 projects in the Repair & Modernization Program and 3 projects in Deferred Maintenance
to an unfunded status as they were deemed unnecessary or cost prohibitive due to changes in scope and
increased cost estimates. Please note that Deferred Maintenance projects are not part of the Bond Program,
however the projects are included in this proposed action since they were previously designated as unfunded by
the Board of Education.
The most recent Board action taken to unfund projects occurred in February 2013 with Board of Education
Report No. 155-12/13. Much like the Board item from a year earlier, select projects in the Repair &
Modernization Program were either cancelled or unfunded because the project scope no longer aligned with
program priorities and/or exceeded the available funds for each project.
Attachment A lists the 335 unfunded projects that are proposed for cancellation including the prior Board
actions related to their unfunded status, project numbers, school names/project names, the Board Districts and
physical Educational Service Centers where projects were located, program types, and project costs. The
cancellation of unfunded projects will allow any remaining facilities needs associated with these projects to be
evaluated more comprehensively as part of the School Upgrade Program and its development of funded
projects in the future.
Attachment B is organized by school names/project names and lists the 19 active projects that are proposed for
cancellation including project numbers, the Board districts and physical Educational Service Centers where
projects were located, managed programs, and project costs. The cancellation of these active projects will
assist in the production of the 2014 Facilities Services Division SEP by ensuring that the annual update
includes only the scope that will move forward in the Bond Program.
meeting of May 29, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed Facilities Services Division SEP amendment
will facilitate implementation of the SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to
successfully complete the SEP.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Cancellation of Unfunded Projects
Attachment B - Cancellation of Active Projects
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
244
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
A
l
d
a
m
a

E
S

-

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n

-

C
S
R
5
E
a
s
t
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
7
2
4
,
5
3
7
1
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
e
g
i
o
n

H
S

#
1
5
2
E
a
s
t
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
2
5
8
,
0
4
5
1
0
0
0
1
3
1
4
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
e
g
i
o
n

M
S

#
9
2
E
a
s
t
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
6
8
9
,
9
2
8
1
0
0
0
1
2
9
3
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
e
g
i
o
n

S
p
a
n

6
-
1
2

#
1
5
E
a
s
t
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
6
1
8
,
7
3
3
1
0
0
0
2
7
7
9
D
e
n
a

N
e
w

P
C

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
2
E
a
s
t
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
5
3
,
1
9
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
3
4
E
a
s
t

V
a
l
l
e
y

A
r
e
a

N
e
w

H
S

#
1
B

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
6
N
o
r
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
3
5
3
,
5
3
4
1
0
0
0
2
7
9
8
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
S

#
1
3
7
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
4
2
,
0
5
8
1
0
0
0
2
7
9
9
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
S

#
1
4
7
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
6
0
8
1
0
0
0
1
3
2
8
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

H
S

#
1
3
7
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
6
,
4
9
0
,
1
4
4
1
0
0
0
1
3
3
2
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

H
S

#
1
4
7
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
4
2
4
,
7
3
8
1
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

M
S

#
4
5
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
1
9
,
0
7
3
,
2
9
4
1
0
0
0
1
4
7
2
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

M
S

#
7
7
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
1
6
2
,
2
3
5
1
0
0
0
2
7
9
4
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

S
p
a
n

K
-
8

#
4
5
S
o
u
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
1
7
,
7
6
1
1
0
0
0
2
7
8
8
V
a
l
l
e
y

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
S

#
1
5
6
N
o
r
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
2
0
,
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
1
3
0
2
V
a
l
l
e
y

R
e
g
i
o
n

M
o
n
r
o
e

S
p
a
n

K
-
8

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
6
N
o
r
t
h
N
e
w

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
4
7
4
,
3
1
7
1
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
B
a
n
n
i
n
g

H
S

-

C
H
P
S
7
S
o
u
t
h
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
9
7
B
a
n
n
i
n
g

H
S

-

R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d

W
a
t
e
r
7
S
o
u
t
h
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
9
5
B
i
r
m
i
n
g
h
a
m

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d

W
a
t
e
r
3
N
o
r
t
h
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
9
4
C
l
a
y

M
S

-

R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d

W
a
t
e
r
1
W
e
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
0
0
3
8
3
7
N
e
w
m
a
n

N
u
t
r
i
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

P
h
o
t
o
v
o
l
t
a
i
c

I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
2
E
a
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
2
1
,
6
9
8
1
0
0
0
4
2
9
6
W
e
s
t
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
c
i
e
n
c
e
s

M
a
g
n
e
t
s

-

R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d

W
a
t
e
r
4
W
e
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
9
8
W
r
i
g
h
t

M
S

-

R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d

W
a
t
e
r
4
W
e
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
0
8
1
s
t

S
t
.

E
S

-

D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c

W
a
t
e
r

D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
0
2
8
t
h

S
t
.

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
e
a
t

P
u
m
p
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
7
,
7
7
9
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
0
2
n
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

T
-
B
a
r

C
e
i
l
i
n
g

t
o

C
o
v
e
r

P
i
p
e
s

i
n

H
a
l
l
w
a
y

a
t

M
a
i
n

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
2
9
2
n
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
,
5
7
9
1
0
1
0
7
8
9
1
4
2
n
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
e
i
l
i
n
g

T
i
l
e
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
4
3
5
2
n
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
2
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
9
9
4
9
3
r
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

H
V
A
C

D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
0
7
,
0
4
6
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
9
9
5
t
h

S
t
.

E
E
C

-

R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e

P
a
r
k
i
n
g

L
o
t
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
0
,
3
9
8
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
6
9
t
h

S
t
.

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

N
e
w

A
r
c
a
d
e

T
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t

C
a
m
p
u
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
6
5
0
1
0
1
0
6
6
8
5
A
m
b
l
e
r

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
m
p

a
t

S
c
h
o
o
l

E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
6
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
8
4
4
A
n
d
a
s
o
l

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

F
l
o
o
r

C
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
5
,
4
6
5
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

1
1
2
-
0
7
/
0
8

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

O
c
t
o
b
e
r

2
3
,

2
0
0
7
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

0
8
6
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

1
3
,

2
0
1
1
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

1

o
f

1
0
245
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
8
1
6
8
A
n
g
e
l
'
s

G
a
t
e

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s

H
V
A
C
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
1
7
5
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
3
A
r
r
o
y
o

S
e
c
o

M
u
s
e
u
m

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g

W
a
l
l
,

F
o
o
t
i
n
g
s
,

F
e
n
c
i
n
g
,

a
n
d

T
r
e
e

o
n

N
o
r
t
h

S
i
d
e

o
f

C
a
m
p
u
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
4
,
2
9
5
1
0
1
0
2
1
9
0
B
a
r
t
o
n

H
i
l
l

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
8
5
,
0
6
5
1
0
1
0
0
6
7
7
B
a
s
s
e
t
t

E
S

-

F
l
o
o
r

C
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
*
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
5
B
e
a
c
h
y

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
9
,
4
5
7
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
1
B
e
c
k
f
o
r
d

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

f
o
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

-

P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d

E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
4
B
e
e
t
h
o
v
e
n

E
S

-

O
f
f
i
c
e

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

i
n

N
u
r
s
e
'
s

O
f
f
i
c
e

a
n
d

B
o
o
k
r
o
o
m
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
1
,
9
7
3
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
9
B
e
l
l

H
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
3
4
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
6
B
e
l
l
i
n
g
h
a
m

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
3
9
B
e
l
v
e
d
e
r
e

M
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
9
B
e
t
h
u
n
e

M
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

t
o

C
o
n
v
e
r
t

S
h
o
p
s

t
o

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

L
a
b
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
6
7
4
B
i
r
m
i
n
g
h
a
m

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

H
e
a
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
3
5
,
7
9
1
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
2
B
r
i
d
g
e

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

N
e
w

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
5
0
0
1
0
1
0
6
5
7
4
B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e

D
u
m
p
s
t
e
r

B
a
y
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
0
B
u
r
r
o
u
g
h
s

M
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
2
,
1
3
6
1
0
1
0
3
9
8
3
B
u
r
r
o
u
g
h
s

M
S

-

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
8
1
9
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
B
u
r
t
o
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
0
,
0
6
7
1
0
1
0
0
8
6
4
C
a
m
e
l
l
i
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

W
a
l
l

M
o
u
n
t

H
e
a
t

P
u
m
p
s

w
i
t
h

R
o
o
f
t
o
p

U
n
i
t
s
,

H
e
a
t
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
,

W
a
l
l
-
H
u
n
g

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
9
,
7
3
5
1
0
1
0
6
5
9
0
C
a
n
f
i
e
l
d

E
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

O
u
t
d
a
t
e
d

H
e
a
t
e
r
s

i
n

6

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
5
8
8
C
a
n
f
i
e
l
d

E
S

-

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
8
0
4
1
0
1
0
7
8
2
0
C
a
r
n
e
g
i
e

M
S

-

P
l
u
m
b
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
*
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
1
7
C
a
r
n
e
g
i
e

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
v
e

P
a
r
k
i
n
g

L
o
t
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
8
,
6
2
2
1
0
1
0
7
8
2
1
C
a
r
n
e
g
i
e

M
S

-

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
*
$
5
,
7
2
4
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
5
C
a
r
t
h
a
y

C
e
n
t
e
r

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

O
u
t
l
e
t
s

i
n

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
8
1
C
a
r
v
e
r

M
S

-

F
l
o
o
r

F
i
n
i
s
h
e
s

i
n

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
,
0
6
6
1
0
1
0
2
4
8
2
C
a
r
v
e
r

M
S

-

O
t
h
e
r

P
l
u
m
b
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
,
7
8
7
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
1
C
a
r
v
e
r

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
o
i
l
e
r
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
7
,
0
7
5
1
0
1
0
6
7
1
7
C
a
s
t
l
e

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

o
f

1
5

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

O
u
t
d
a
t
e
d

U
n
i
t
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
7
C
h
a
n
d
l
e
r

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
9
6
C
h
a
p
m
a
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
v
e

P
a
r
k
i
n
g

L
o
t
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
2
,
7
8
3
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
9
C
h
a
s
e

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
8
C
h
a
t
s
w
o
r
t
h

H
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

C
a
m
e
r
a
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
3
9
3
C
i
e
n
e
g
a

E
S

-

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
/
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

i
n

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
5
5
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

2

o
f

1
0
246
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
2
1
3
2
C
i
t
y

T
e
r
r
a
c
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
3
6
C
l
o
v
e
r

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

C
a
b
i
n
e
t
r
y
/
S
t
o
r
a
g
e

i
n

S
t
a
f
f

L
o
u
n
g
e
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
2
7
7
1
0
1
0
6
7
4
4
C
l
o
v
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

S
i
n
k
/
F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
9
5
5
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
8
C
o
l
d
w
a
t
e
r

C
a
n
y
o
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
0
2
,
9
2
5
1
0
1
0
2
3
9
4
C
o
l
i
s
e
u
m

E
S

-

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

&

B
r
a
n
c
h

W
i
r
i
n
g

i
n

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
4
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s

E
S

-

A
r
c
a
d
e

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
5
6
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

M
a
g
n
e
t

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

S
t
o
v
e

U
n
i
t
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
0
1
5
1
0
1
0
6
5
6
1
C
o
r
o
n
a

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
0
,
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
9
8
9
C
o
r
o
n
a

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
6
,
2
3
1
1
0
1
0
2
5
0
5
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w

H
S

-

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
/
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

i
n

M
u
l
t
i
p
u
r
p
o
s
e

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
5
8
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e

A
r
t
s
/
S
o
c
i
a
l

J
u
s
t
i
c
e

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

P
i
p
i
n
g

i
n

P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l

&

V
i
c
e

P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l

O
f
f
i
c
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
6
6
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e

A
r
t
s
/
S
o
c
i
a
l

J
u
s
t
i
c
e

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
u
t
t
e
r
s

a
t

2

B
u
n
g
a
l
o
w
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
0
5
1
0
1
0
5
1
7
5
D
e
l

A
m
o

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

M
u
l
t
i
z
o
n
e

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
5
,
0
8
3
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
2
D
e
l

R
e
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

P
a
t
c
h
/
S
l
u
r
r
y

A
r
o
u
n
d

C
a
m
p
u
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
0
0
D
e
l
e
v
a
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

A
l
l

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g

F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
6
5
2
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
7
D
e
n
a

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

M
a
i
n

O
f
f
i
c
e
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
3
9
9
D
e
n
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g

P
a
v
i
n
g
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
9
3
3
1
0
1
0
0
9
2
2
D
e
n
k
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

&

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

P
a
v
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
6
,
3
8
5
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
7
D
o
u
g
l
a
s

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

&

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

N
e
w

S
h
a
d
e

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
3
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
D
o
u
g
l
a
s

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
4
1
5
1
0
1
0
2
0
5
1
D
y
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
8
,
4
6
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
9
3
E
a
r
h
a
r
t

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
6
8
4
E
l
i
z
a
b
e
t
h

L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
u
n
g
a
l
o
w
s

w
i
t
h

2
-
S
t
o
r
y

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
9
E
l
y
s
i
a
n

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

5

D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g

F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
5
,
0
9
8
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
4
E
m
e
l
i
t
a

E
S

-

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

O
u
t
l
e
t
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
9
5
E
m
e
r
s
o
n

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

F
e
n
c
e
/
G
a
t
e
s

C
a
m
p
u
s
w
i
d
e
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
1
1
E
s
p
e
r
a
n
z
a

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
1
2
E
s
p
e
r
a
n
z
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
0
,
2
7
8
1
0
1
0
7
4
8
6
E
u
c
l
i
d

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
4
,
7
2
9
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
4
E
u
c
l
i
d

E
S

-

R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e

P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
7
3
1
0
1
0
2
1
1
4
E
v
a
n
s

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

A
d
u
l
t

S
c
h
o
o
l

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
1
1
0
1
0
6
8
4
7
F
a
i
r
b
u
r
n

E
S

-

F
i
r
e

A
l
a
r
m

S
y
s
t
e
m
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
0
,
1
1
6
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
4
F
a
i
r
f
a
x

H
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

M
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d

B
l
e
a
c
h
e
r
s
/
G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
7
6
1
F
a
i
r
f
a
x

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
o
o
r

H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e

(
C
a
r
d

A
c
c
e
s
s
)
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
5
4
7
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

3

o
f

1
0
247
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
8
F
a
r
m
d
a
l
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

2

B
u
n
g
a
l
o
w
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
5
3
F
e
r
n
a
n
g
e
l
e
s

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
4
3
1
0
1
0
7
8
4
4
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a

E
S

-

U
p
g
r
a
d
e

M
a
i
n

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
4
2
8
F
r
o
s
t

M
S

-

N
e
w

E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
2
8
,
6
8
1
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
3
G
a
r
d
e
n

G
r
o
v
e

E
S

-

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
0
0
G
a
r
d
e
n
a

B
u
s

G
a
r
a
g
e

-

F
i
r
e

A
l
a
r
m

S
y
s
t
e
m
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
6
G
a
u
l
t

E
S

-

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
8
G
e
r
m
a
i
n

E
S

-

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
5
5
G
l
e
n
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
2
1
G
l
e
n
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s

H
V
A
C
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
7
G
r
a
n
a
d
a

H
i
l
l
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

i
n

S
h
o
p
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
3
,
3
6
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
8
G
r
a
n
a
d
a

H
i
l
l
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

F
o
l
d
e
r

B
l
e
a
c
h
e
r
s

i
n

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
7
3
G
r
a
n
a
d
a

H
i
l
l
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
2
,
0
5
8
1
0
1
0
2
3
8
8
G
r
a
t
t
s

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
6
2
9
G
r
a
t
t
s

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

3
9

N
e
w

W
i
n
d
o
w

S
p
r
i
n
g

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
0
G
r
e
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

C
o
n
v
e
r
t

B
u
n
g
a
l
o
w

t
o

O
f
f
i
c
e
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
6
G
r
e
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

P
a
v
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
4
G
r
e
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
5
1
G
r
i
f
f
i
n

E
S

-

E
n
c
l
o
s
e

2

S
i
d
e
s

o
f

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
8
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

S
i
n
k
/
F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
,
6
3
2
1
0
1
0
6
8
1
1
H
a
m
a
s
a
k
i

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
o
i
l
e
r
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
1
,
6
1
2
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
5
H
a
m
i
l
t
o
n

H
S

-

G
r
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
7
4
,
2
2
6
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
6
H
a
m
l
i
n

E
S

-

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

S
o
u
n
d

S
y
s
t
e
m
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
1
H
a
r
t

E
S

-

N
e
w

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
1
,
6
2
1
1
0
1
0
7
4
6
9
H
a
r
t
e

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
o
r
y

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
o
i
l
e
r

i
n

B
o
y
s

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
7
,
6
7
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
9
8
H
a
r
t
e

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
o
r
y

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
o
i
l
e
r

i
n

G
i
r
l
s

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
2
,
0
2
3
1
0
1
0
6
9
1
6
H
a
s
k
e
l
l

E
S

-

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
8
,
9
1
3
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
6
H
a
s
k
e
l
l

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
3
,
7
9
4
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
5
H
a
s
k
e
l
l

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
6
5
5
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
3
H
a
y
n
e
s

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
1
9
1
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
3
H
a
y
n
e
s

E
S

-

R
o
o
f

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
3
,
3
8
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
0
H
a
z
e
l
t
i
n
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
6
,
2
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
8
9
8
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e

E
S

-

R
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
4
,
6
2
7
1
0
1
0
7
7
4
7
H
o
b
a
r
t

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

B
u
i
l
d

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

L
a
b
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
5
0
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

4

o
f

1
0
248
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
1
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

P
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
9
9
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
2
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e

R
a
m
p
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
5
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
9
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

S
h
o
w
e
r
s

a
t

W
e
s
t

a
n
d

E
a
s
t

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
1
4
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
0
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m

L
o
c
k
e
r
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
6
6
7
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

S
t
a
i
r
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
5
,
6
0
1
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
4
H
o
l
m
e
s

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
0
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
8
9
2
H
o
o
v
e
r

E
S

-

C
o
o
l
i
n
g

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
8
9
,
7
6
6
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
4
H
u
g
h
e
s

E
S

-

C
o
v
e
r
e
d

W
a
l
k
w
a
y

f
r
o
m

M
a
i
n

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

t
o

M
u
l
t
i
p
u
r
p
o
s
e

R
o
o
m
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
5
,
3
3
3
1
0
1
0
2
1
3
7
H
u
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
7
,
5
8
8
1
0
1
0
0
9
9
0
H
u
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n

P
a
r
k

H
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
e
d

W
a
t
e
r

L
i
n
e
s

&

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
,
0
8
7
1
0
1
0
2
4
2
7
H
y
d
e

P
a
r
k

E
S

-

F
l
o
o
r

F
i
n
i
s
h
e
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
3
3
5
H
y
d
e

P
a
r
k

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
9
,
7
0
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
0
I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e

E
S

-

P
r
i
v
a
c
y

S
c
r
e
e
n
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
1
8
I
r
v
i
n
g

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
1
8
7
5
I
r
v
i
n
g

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
o
c
k
e
r
s

p
e
r

S
u
r
v
e
y

&

A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

P
l
a
n
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
4
6
I
r
v
i
n
g

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

S
i
t
e
w
i
d
e
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
4
8
1
0
1
0
2
5
1
0
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n

H
S

-

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

&

B
r
a
n
c
h

W
i
r
i
n
g
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
5
1
1
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n

H
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
8
8
1
0
1
0
5
3
1
1
J
o
r
d
a
n

H
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

T
r
a
c
k

&

F
i
e
l
d

(
P
h
a
s
e

I
I
)
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
7
8
6
,
6
5
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
9
J
u
s
t
i
c
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
3
7
3
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
1
K
e
n
n
e
d
y

H
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

F
l
o
o
r

C
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
7
K
e
n
n
e
d
y

H
S

-

R
o
o
f

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
2
K
e
s
t
e
r

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
4
2
K
i
n
g

M
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

W
a
l
l

D
i
v
i
d
i
n
g

R
o
o
m
s

1
5
4
,

1
5
4
A
,

5
0
0
,

a
n
d

D
e
a
n
'
s

O
f
f
i
c
e
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
3
K
i
t
t
r
i
d
g
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
4
L
a
n
e

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
7
,
0
6
4
1
0
1
0
6
8
9
7
L
a
n
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

B
a
t
h
r
o
o
m

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
,
4
0
8
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
4
L
a
n
k
e
r
s
h
i
m

E
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
6
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
9
,
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
5
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e

M
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
,
4
0
9
1
0
1
0
7
4
6
6
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e

M
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
3
,
5
1
7
1
0
1
0
7
8
4
7
L
e

C
o
n
t
e

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

L
i
g
h
t
s

M
a
i
n

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
7
2
0
1
0
1
0
5
8
1
9
L
e

C
o
n
t
e

M
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
6
,
2
8
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
3
L
e
o
n
i
s

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
3
8
L
e
x
i
n
g
t
o
n

P
C

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

D
a
m
a
g
e
d

F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g

i
n

R
o
o
m
s

1
3
,

1
4
,

1
6
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
6
8
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

5

o
f

1
0
249
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
8
L
i
g
g
e
t
t

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

R
a
m
p
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
9
2
L
i
l
l
i
a
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

W
i
n
d
o
w

S
a
s
h
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
5
1
2
L
i
n
c
o
l
n

H
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
s

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
5
L
o
c
k
h
u
r
s
t

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
u
t
t
e
r
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
2
2
L
o
g
a
n

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
8
7
L
o
g
a
n

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
7
3
,
8
2
8
1
0
1
0
2
7
6
2
L
o
r
e
t
o

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
o
o
r

H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e

(
C
a
r
d

A
c
c
e
s
s
)
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
4
8
3
1
0
1
0
2
4
3
4
L
o
r
e
t
o

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
s

i
n

2
/
3

U
n
i
t

R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
7
6
2
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
1
L
o
r
n
e

E
S

-

O
f
f
i
c
e

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
7
6
0
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

C
e
n
t
e
r

f
o
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
o
o
r

H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e

(
C
a
r
d

A
c
c
e
s
s
)
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
6
4
5
1
0
1
0
1
6
1
9
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

H
S

-

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m

B
l
e
a
c
h
e
r
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
6
,
5
5
0
1
0
1
0
3
6
1
0
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

H
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

M
e
t
a
l

S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e

I
n
f
i
l
l

S
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

G
r
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
s
,

A
d
d

H
a
n
d
i
c
a
p

S
i
t
t
i
n
g

A
r
e
a
,

a
n
d

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
5
,
6
1
9
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
2
L
o
s

F
e
l
i
z

E
S

-

F
i
r
e

S
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
s

i
n

B
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
2
,
5
4
7
1
0
1
0
7
9
1
9
L
o
w
m
a
n

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
4
5
4
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
5
M
a
c
l
a
y

M
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
0
M
a
d
i
s
o
n

M
S

-

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

S
h
o
p
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
5
3
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
7
M
a
d
i
s
o
n

M
S

-

H
V
A
C

U
p
g
r
a
d
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
8
4
9
1
0
1
0
6
9
0
8
M
a
i
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

2
0

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

W
a
l
l

U
n
i
t
s
7
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
4
M
a
i
n

E
S

-

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
7
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
5
M
a
l
a
b
a
r

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
8
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
1
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
8
7
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
1
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
7
4
8
M
a
n
n

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
9
M
a
r
i
a
n
n
a

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

A
u
t
o

G
a
t
e
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
5
4
2
M
a
r
i
n
a

D
e
l

R
e
y

M
S

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

L
o
c
k
e
r
s

&

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

D
i
s
p
l
a
y

C
a
s
e
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
4
8
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
7
9
M
a
r
q
u
e
z

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

R
o
o
f
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
3
9
M
a
r
v
i
n

E
S

-

C
e
i
l
i
n
g

F
i
n
i
s
h
e
s

i
n

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

A
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
8
6
1
M
a
r
v
i
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

S
e
w
e
r

D
r
a
i
n
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
8
8
8
M
a
r
v
i
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
e
i
l
i
n
g

T
i
l
e
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
3
2
5
1
0
1
0
6
8
9
9
M
c
B
r
i
d
e

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

A
c
c
o
r
d
i
o
n

D
o
o
r

a
n
d

S
h
e
l
f

U
n
i
t
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
5
M
c
B
r
i
d
e

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

A
i
r

P
u
r
i
f
i
e
r
s

i
n

N
o
r
t
h

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
6
M
e
l
r
o
s
e

E
S

M
a
t
h
/
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
/
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

B
o
y
s
/
G
i
r
l
s

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
4
M
e
l
v
i
n

E
S

-

H
V
A
C

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
,

L
o
u
n
g
e
,

C
a
f
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

E
S

-

O
f
f
i
c
e

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

6

o
f

1
0
250
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
M
e
y
l
e
r

E
S

-

P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n

P
a
v
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
8
,
6
7
8
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
5
M
i
d
d
l
e
t
o
n

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
7
0
1
0
1
0
4
7
2
7
M
i
l
e
s

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
3
0
,
2
0
8
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
3
M
i
l
e
s

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

2
-
S
t
o
r
y

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
8
M
i
l
l
e
r

C
a
r
e
e
r

&

T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
C
h
a
n
g
e

T
a
b
l
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
1
M
i
l
l
e
r

C
a
r
e
e
r

&

T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

M
u
l
t
i
p
u
r
p
o
s
e

R
o
o
m

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
3
4
M
i
l
l
i
k
a
n

M
S

-

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m

N
o
n

Y
e
a
r
-
R
o
u
n
d

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
6
,
7
2
7
1
0
1
0
1
8
8
0
M
o
n
l
u
x

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

&

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

N
e
w

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

a
t

N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t

A
r
e
a

o
f

S
i
t
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
6
,
9
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
5
1
7
M
o
n
r
o
e

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
s

i
n

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

&

L
i
b
r
a
r
y
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
5
1
8
M
o
n
r
o
e

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
a
s

&

W
a
t
e
r

L
i
n
e
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
8
5
2
M
o
n
r
o
e

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d

W
a
t
e
r

&

G
a
s

L
i
n
e
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
6
,
6
7
7
1
0
1
0
0
8
7
0
M
o
n
t
a
g
u
e

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
e
a
t

&

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
7
,
4
8
6
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
2
M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

V
i
e
w

E
S

-

N
e
w

A
r
c
a
d
e
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
,
2
1
9
1
0
1
0
0
8
7
2
M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

V
i
e
w

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

W
a
t
e
r

M
a
i
n
s
,

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
,

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

P
o
t
a
b
l
e

W
a
t
e
r

S
y
s
t
e
m
,

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
m
o
d
e
l

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
0
,
0
8
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
M
u
l
h
o
l
l
a
n
d

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
7
5
7
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
9
M
u
l
h
o
l
l
a
n
d

M
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
0
6
1
0
1
0
6
7
7
4
N
e
s
t
l
e

E
S

-

P
a
v
i
n
g
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
7
8
N
e
w
c
a
s
t
l
e

E
S

-

A
i
r

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
0
N
o
b
e
l

M
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

C
a
m
e
r
a
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
2
N
o
b
e
l

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

W
i
n
d
o
w

C
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
2
N
o
b
l
e

E
S

-

A
d
d

G
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
/
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
2
N
o
b
l
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d

E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
9
N
o
r
t
h

H
o
l
l
y
w
o
o
d

H
S

-

E
y
e

W
a
s
h
/
F
u
m
e

H
o
o
d
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
3
,
0
3
6
1
0
1
0
2
3
8
7
N
u
e
v
a

V
i
s
t
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

A
l
l

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
5
5
O
d
y
s
s
e
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
7
,
6
7
2
1
0
1
0
6
9
1
2
O
v
e
r
l
a
n
d

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

A
w
n
i
n
g
s

i
n

R
o
o
m
s

2
5
-
3
0
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
5
9
O
x
n
a
r
d

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
s

i
n

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
4
8
4
1
0
1
0
0
8
7
6
P
a
c
o
i
m
a

M
S

-

R
o
o
f

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
,
3
0
1
1
0
1
0
6
9
2
2
P
a
l
i
s
a
d
e
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
S

-

C
C
T
V
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
4
,
6
9
8
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
1
P
a
l
m
s

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

2
0
0

L
o
c
k
e
r

O
p
e
n
i
n
g
s

i
n

B
o
y
s
/
G
i
r
l
s

G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
1
7
1
0
1
0
2
4
6
0
P
a
s
e
o

d
e
l

R
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
l
a
s
s

W
i
n
d
o
w
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
0
8
P
e
a
r
y

M
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
1
0
5
1
0
1
0
0
2
4
7
P
e
a
r
y

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
e
a
t

E
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
/
B
o
i
l
e
r
s
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
0
5
,
5
5
9
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
3
P
e
r
e
z

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

G
u
t
t
e
r
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

7

o
f

1
0
251
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
7
8
3
7
P
e
t
t
i
g
r
e
w

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
7
P
h
o
e
n
i
x

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e

P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

A
t
h
l
e
t
i
c

P
o
s
t
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
6
P
i
n
e
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
3
1
P
i
o

P
i
c
o

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
2
5
P
o
i
n
t

F
e
r
m
i
n

M
a
r
i
n
e

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
0
2
,
9
4
8
1
0
1
0
2
1
2
5
P
o
l
i
t
i

E
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
1
9
P
o
r
t
e
r

M
S

-

R
o
o
f

C
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
s
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
0
8
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
7
P
r
i
m
a
r
y

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

P
C

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
8
R
a
n
c
h
i
t
o

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
7
R
e
s
e
d
a

E
S

-

N
e
w

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

O
f
f
i
c
e

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
4
,
3
2
7
1
0
1
0
0
9
7
6
R
e
s
e
d
a

H
S

-

P
a
r
k
i
n
g

L
o
t
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
3
,
4
9
7
1
0
1
0
6
9
1
3
R
e
s
e
d
a

H
S

-

S
a
f
e
t
y

&

T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
9
8
R
e
v
e
r
e

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
a
m
a
g
e
d

C
e
i
l
i
n
g

T
i
l
e
s
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
6
8
R
i
o

V
i
s
t
a

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
0
R
o
o
s
e
v
e
l
t

H
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

N
e
w

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
1
R
o
s
e
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

S
m
a
r
t

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

P
l
u
m
b
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
8
6
R
u
s
s
e
l
l

E
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
8
4
R
u
s
s
e
l
l

E
S

-

S
a
n
d

B
l
a
s
t
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
7
5
,
5
8
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
0
S
a
n

A
n
t
o
n
i
o

E
S

-

U
p
g
r
a
d
e

F
i
r
e

A
l
a
r
m

S
y
s
t
e
m
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
7
0
S
a
n

F
e
r
n
a
n
d
o

H
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
6
7
S
h
e
n
a
n
d
o
a
h

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

M
u
l
t
i
p
u
r
p
o
s
e

R
o
o
m
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
,
9
7
4
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
1
S
h
e
r
m
a
n

O
a
k
s

C
e
n
t
e
r

f
o
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
6
6
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
0
S
h
e
r
m
a
n

O
a
k
s

C
e
n
t
e
r

f
o
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
7
8
5
S
h
e
r
m
a
n

O
a
k
s

C
e
n
t
e
r

f
o
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

-

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
e

L
e
a
d

i
n

W
a
t
e
r
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
6
2
9
1
0
1
0
6
9
5
9
S
h
o
r
t

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
a
b
i
n
e
t
s

&

F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
7
1
S
o
l
a
n
o

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
8
9
5
1
0
1
0
8
1
7
1
S
o
u
t
h

G
a
t
e

H
S

-

E
n
c
l
o
s
e

L
u
n
c
h

P
a
v
i
l
i
o
n

&

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

N
e
w

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
0
,
6
8
7
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
3
S
o
u
t
h

G
a
t
e

M
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

2
-
S
t
o
r
y

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
6
2
1
0
1
0
2
7
6
3
S
t
a
t
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
o
o
r

H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e

(
C
a
r
d

A
c
c
e
s
s
)
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
6
7
9
1
0
1
0
6
8
8
2
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
o
n

M
S

-

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
,
8
3
2
1
0
1
0
6
7
7
7
S
t
o
n
e
r

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

S
l
i
d
i
n
g

P
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n

W
a
l
l
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
4
2
2
1
0
1
0
7
9
2
0
S
t
o
n
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

P
i
p
i
n
g

i
n

S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
4
,
3
5
5
1
0
1
0
0
8
7
9
S
u
n

V
a
l
l
e
y

M
S

-

H
e
a
t
i
n
g

U
n
i
t

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
7
1
,
7
0
8
1
0
1
0
7
9
2
4
S
u
t
t
e
r

M
S

-

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g

&

R
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
5
S
u
t
t
e
r

M
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

t
h
e

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

S
t
a
g
e

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
4
,
6
0
1
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

8

o
f

1
0
252
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
2
0
7
3
T
e
l
f
a
i
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
8
,
9
8
5
1
0
1
0
7
8
3
2
T
e
m
e
s
c
a
l

C
a
n
y
o
n

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
3
7
8
0
T
o
l
u
c
a

L
a
k
e

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
7
1
,
0
9
7
1
0
1
0
8
0
0
6
T
o
p
a
n
g
a

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

O
u
t
d
o
o
r

A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
8
8
9
T
o
p
a
n
g
a

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
7
,
9
6
1
1
0
1
0
7
9
7
9
T
o
p
a
n
g
a

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

S
t
o
r
m

D
r
a
i
n

i
n

L
o
w
e
r

P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
2
,
4
1
7
1
0
1
0
6
8
5
8
T
r
i
n
i
t
y

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

P
a
n
e
l
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
2
3
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y

H
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s

H
V
A
C
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
,
3
7
4
1
0
1
0
6
6
7
9
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

E
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g

W
a
l
l
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
5
,
7
4
3
1
0
1
0
2
0
7
7
V
a
n

N
u
y
s

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

A
d
u
l
t

S
c
h
o
o
l

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
0
V
a
n

N
u
y
s

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

A
d
u
l
t

S
c
h
o
o
l

-

P
a
v
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
4
V
e
n
i
c
e

H
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
7
1
,
2
3
4
1
0
1
0
7
9
8
5
V
e
n
i
c
e

H
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

L
o
c
k
e
r
s

a
t

C
u
n
n
i
n
g
h
a
m

H
a
l
l
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
0
3
5
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
7
V
e
n
i
c
e

H
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r

C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e

f
r
o
m

R
o
o
t

D
a
m
a
g
e

A
l
o
n
g

W
e
s
t

E
n
d
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
4
5
V
e
r
m
o
n
t

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g

T
i
l
e
1
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
1
9
2
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
5
V
e
r
n
o
n

C
i
t
y

E
S

-

E
n
c
l
o
s
e

L
u
n
c
h

P
a
v
i
l
i
o
n
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
3
3
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
8
0
V
i
c
t
o
r
y

E
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
8
2
4
V
i
c
t
o
r
y

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
,
9
2
6
1
0
1
0
8
1
7
0
V
i
n
e

E
S

-

C
o
v
e
r

E
x
p
o
s
e
d

P
i
p
i
n
g

o
n

C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r

C
e
i
l
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
1
8
V
i
n
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

M
a
t
t
i
n
g
/
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d

E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
9
8
8
V
i
r
g
i
l

M
S

-

C
o
o
l
i
n
g

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
9
6
,
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
6
9
6
9
W
a
l
g
r
o
v
e

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
n
d

M
e
t
a
l

D
e
c
k
i
n
g

a
t

A
r
c
a
d
e

b
y

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
6
4
W
a
l
n
u
t

P
a
r
k

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
1
,
0
9
5
1
0
1
0
2
7
6
4
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
o
r
y

H
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

D
o
o
r

H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e

(
C
a
r
d

A
c
c
e
s
s
)
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
7
5
2
1
0
1
0
7
9
9
1
W
e
s
t

H
o
l
l
y
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
m
p

f
r
o
m

U
p
p
e
r

t
o

L
o
w
e
r

Y
a
r
d
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
6
W
e
s
t

H
o
l
l
y
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

C
a
b
i
n
e
t
r
y
/
S
t
o
r
a
g
e

i
n

B
u
n
g
a
l
o
w
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
8
0
2
3
W
e
s
t

H
o
l
l
y
w
o
o
d

E
S

-

U
p
g
r
a
d
e

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
5
8
2
2
W
e
s
t

V
e
r
n
o
n

E
S

-

H
e
a
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
7
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
0
,
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
2
5
2
1
W
e
s
t
c
h
e
s
t
e
r

E
n
r
i
c
h
e
d

S
c
i
e
n
c
e
s

M
a
g
n
e
t
s

-

E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
/
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

i
n

M
a
t
h

&

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
2
2
W
e
s
t
m
i
n
s
t
e
r

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s

H
V
A
C
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
7
7
5
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
3
W
h
i
t
e

H
o
u
s
e

P
C

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

N
e
w

M
u
l
t
i
p
u
r
p
o
s
e

R
o
o
m
/
A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
/
C
a
f
e
t
e
r
i
a
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
3
5
,
7
8
5
1
0
1
0
2
2
1
4
W
h
i
t
e

P
o
i
n
t

E
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
7
9
1
W
o
o
d
l
a
n
d

H
i
l
l
s

E
S

-

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
7
9
6
5
W
o
o
d
l
a
n
d

H
i
l
l
s

E
S

-

L
i
b
r
a
r
y

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

9

o
f

1
0
253
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

U
N
F
U
N
D
E
D

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
1
0
0
9
9
2
W
o
o
d
l
a
w
n

E
S

-

P
l
u
m
b
i
n
g

F
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
4
,
8
4
6
1
0
1
0
7
9
5
6
W
r
i
g
h
t

M
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
3
6
0
1
0
1
0
8
1
6
9
W
r
i
g
h
t

M
S

-

R
e
p
a
i
r
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e

W
i
n
d
o
w

S
a
s
h

i
n

C
a
f
e
t
e
r
i
a
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
8
2
7
3
r
d

S
t
.

E
S

-

A
s
b
e
s
t
o
s

A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
4
,
1
4
9
1
0
1
0
3
7
4
0
B
r
a
d
l
e
y

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

S
c
i
e
n
c
e
/
H
u
m
a
n
i
t
i
e
s

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

M
a
i
n

O
f
f
i
c
e

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
1
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
5
7
,
6
4
2
1
0
1
0
0
9
7
1
C
h
a
s
e

E
S

-

T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

&

P
a
c
k
a
g
e

U
n
i
t
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
4
,
8
2
4
1
0
1
4
4
5
6
7
C
l
e
v
e
l
a
n
d

H
S

-

O
f
f
i
c
e

M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
0
5
8
1
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

M
a
g
n
e
t

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
S

-

A
s
b
e
s
t
o
s

A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
3
,
7
3
5
1
0
1
0
2
1
7
2
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
,
9
0
2
1
0
1
0
2
1
9
9
F
r
i
e
s

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
,
2
8
6
1
0
1
0
3
7
9
5
G
a
g
e

M
S

-

R
e
m
o
d
e
l

C
o
v
e
r
e
d

E
a
t
i
n
g

A
r
e
a
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
6
7
,
3
6
8
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
4
H
e
l
i
o
t
r
o
p
e

E
S

-

A
D
A

C
o
d
e

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
9
7
,
6
1
5
1
0
1
4
2
5
5
3
L
u
l
l

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

C
e
n
t
e
r

-

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
5
0
2
0
M
a
l
a
b
a
r

E
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
5
9
,
7
7
8
1
0
1
0
2
6
6
3
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l

H
S

-

N
o
n

A
i
r
-
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
e
d

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s

&

M
D
F

R
o
o
m
5
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
5
6
4
1
0
1
0
4
8
4
0
M
e
l
r
o
s
e

E
S

M
a
t
h
/
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
/
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

M
a
g
n
e
t

-

R
e
m
o
v
e

2

O
l
d

W
o
o
d

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s

a
n
d

L
a
r
g
e

T
r
e
e

N
e
a
r

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
,

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

1

M
e
t
a
l

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r

&

A
r
c
a
d
e
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
8
,
5
9
0
1
0
1
0
4
7
9
9
N
i
m
i
t
z

M
S

-

A
D
A

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
5
,
0
2
7
1
0
1
0
2
1
5
3
N
u
e
v
a

V
i
s
t
a

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
,
0
5
7
1
0
1
0
0
9
7
5
P
a
r
t
h
e
n
i
a

E
S

-

H
e
a
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
6
5
,
6
6
8
1
0
1
0
0
8
4
2
R
i
l
e
y

H
S

-

A
s
b
e
s
t
o
s

A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
1
9
6
5
R
o
w
a
n

E
S

-

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

S
h
a
d
e

S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
2
,
8
1
9
1
0
1
0
2
1
4
1
R
o
w
a
n

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

H
V
A
C

S
y
s
t
e
m
s
2
E
a
s
t
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
2
0
4
S
a
n

G
a
b
r
i
e
l

E
S

-

S
t
a
g
e

H
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d

L
i
f
t

i
n

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
/
A
D
A

C
o
d
e

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
3
,
7
6
8
1
0
1
0
4
5
1
0
S
o
u
t
h

G
a
t
e

M
S

-

B
a
r
r
i
e
r

R
e
m
o
v
a
l
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
1
2
7
,
2
2
4
1
0
1
0
3
7
7
4
S
o
u
t
h

S
h
o
r
e
s

M
a
g
n
e
t

S
c
h
o
o
l

f
o
r

t
h
e

V
i
s
u
a
l
/
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
i
n
g

A
r
t
s

-

L
u
n
c
h

S
h
e
l
t
e
r
7
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
4
4
,
2
2
4
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
2
S
t
a
t
e

E
S

-

R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e

O
f
f
i
c
e

&

P
r
o
v
i
d
e

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
5
,
0
8
5
1
0
1
0
7
6
9
9
S
t
a
t
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
8
,
8
3
6
1
0
1
0
7
7
0
0
S
t
a
t
e

E
S

-

R
e
p
l
a
c
e

P
a
v
i
n
g
5
S
o
u
t
h
R
e
p
a
i
r

&

M
o
d
e
r
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
1
,
0
1
8
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

1
5
5
-
1
2
/
1
3

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

1
2
,

2
0
1
3
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

R
e
p
o
r
t

N
o
.

2
0
1
-
1
1
/
1
2

A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

A
p
r
i
l

1
0
,

2
0
1
2

(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
*

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s

a
r
e

n
o
t

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

b
o
n
d

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

b
u
t

w
e
r
e

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

b
y

B
o
a
r
d
.
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

1
0

o
f

1
0
254
0123456789
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

B

-

C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

A
C
T
I
V
E

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

#
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
/
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
B
D
E
S
C
M
a
n
a
g
e
d

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

C
o
s
t
s
1
0
3
6
5
2
0
9
1
1
6
t
h

S
t
.

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

(
1

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
)
7
S
o
u
t
h
P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

P
l
a
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
6
6
1
4
3
7
t
h

S
t
.

E
E
C

-

B
u
i
l
d

P
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n
s

B
e
t
w
e
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s
1
W
e
s
t
E
C
E

-

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

R
$
0
1
0
3
6
4
3
3
8
C
h
a
r
n
o
c
k

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l
1
W
e
s
t
P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

P
l
a
n
$
3
,
3
9
9
1
0
3
6
5
2
0
6
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

(
1

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
)
7
S
o
u
t
h
P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

P
l
a
n
$
0
1
0
3
3
7
0
0
8
H
a
r
t

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
2
5
,
0
6
4
1
0
1
0
5
8
1
3
L
a
n
a
i

E
S

-

I
m
p
r
o
v
e

S
t
u
d
e
n
t

D
r
o
p
-
O
f
f

A
r
e
a
4
N
o
r
t
h
A
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
2
9
,
4
6
8
1
0
1
0
7
7
8
1
L
a
n
t
e
r
m
a
n

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

H
S

-

P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

P
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n
s
2
E
a
s
t
M
o
d
i
f
i
e
d

C
o
n
s
e
n
t

D
e
c
r
e
e
$
7
8
,
3
3
1
1
0
3
6
4
3
5
5
M
a
n
n

M
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l
1
W
e
s
t
P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

P
l
a
n
$
2
,
1
5
4
1
0
3
3
7
0
0
9
M
a
r

V
i
s
t
a

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
2
6
,
7
2
7
1
0
3
6
4
1
7
8
M
a
r
i
a
n
n
a

E
S

-

P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l
2
E
a
s
t
P
o
r
t
a
b
l
e

R
e
m
o
v
a
l

P
l
a
n
$
0
1
0
1
0
4
4
7
3
M
i
d
d
l
e
t
o
n

E
S

-

I
n
s
t
a
l
l

C
o
v
e
r
e
d

W
a
l
k
w
a
y

f
o
r

B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

C

&

D
5
S
o
u
t
h
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

K
$
2
7
,
0
1
3
1
0
3
3
7
0
1
0
N
e
v
a
d
a

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
3
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
2
2
,
6
9
5
1
0
1
0
2
5
4
3
O
r
t
h
o
p
a
e
d
i
c

H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l

M
e
d
i
c
a
l

M
a
g
n
e
t

H
S

-

C
o
n
v
e
r
t

C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

2
1
9

i
n
t
o

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

L
a
b
2
E
a
s
t
A
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
7
4
,
9
8
7
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
6
P
o
r
t
e
r

M
S

-

A
s
p
h
a
l
t

P
a
v
i
n
g

R
e
p
a
i
r

&

R
e
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
3
N
o
r
t
h
M
a
j
o
r

R
e
p
a
i
r
s

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

R
$
3
1
5
1
0
2
0
4
0
3
3
R
o
w
a
n

E
S

-

A
D
A

R
a
m
p

U
p
g
r
a
d
e
2
E
a
s
t
A
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
8
,
4
2
1
1
0
1
0
4
2
2
8
S
o
u
t
h

G
a
t
e

M
S

-

H
a
n
d
r
a
i
l
,

3

D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g

F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
,

2

A
D
A

R
a
m
p
s
,

a
n
d

A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m

L
i
f
t
5
S
o
u
t
h
M
o
d
i
f
i
e
d

C
o
n
s
e
n
t

D
e
c
r
e
e
$
5
0
,
4
3
2
1
0
3
3
7
0
1
2
S
y
l
v
a
n

P
a
r
k

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
6
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
1
9
,
7
0
2
1
0
3
3
7
0
1
1
T
o
l
u
c
a

L
a
k
e

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
4
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
2
6
,
4
0
2
1
0
3
3
7
0
1
3
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
S

-

A
c
c
e
s
s

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
4
W
e
s
t
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
a
b
l
e

H
o
u
s
i
n
g

U
n
i
t
$
2
3
,
5
8
8
B
d
.

o
f

E
d
.

R
p
t
.

N
o
.

4
9
4
-
1
3
/
1
4
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

J
u
n
e

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
a
g
e

1

o
f

1
255
0123456789
256
0123456789
257
0123456789
TAB 17
Authorization to Enter into a Lease Extension for a Central High School Program Located at 2812
Newell Street
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education authorize the Chief Facilities Executive, and/or his designee(s), to
extend the lease for the Central High School Program site located at 2812 Newell Street in the city of Los
Angeles for a period of three years beginning on July 1, 2014.
Background:
The Central High School Program is a District-wide dropout prevention and credit recovery school that services
at-risk students on multiple sites. It is dedicated to providing a rigorous, individualized, standards-based,
instructional program to at-risk students.
The Central High School Program has been leasing the 2,356 square foot facility at 2812 Newell Street since
July 2006. The school site serves the areas of Glassell Park, Elysian Valley and Silver Lake, and currently has
two teachers, one aide and enrolls 71 at-risk students annually. The majority of the students walk or travel via
public transportation; therefore any relocation of the site may result in decreased attendance. Furthermore, this
site contains unique vocational features that are incorporated into the educational programming such as a
bicycle repair shop and radio broadcast equipment.
The school site is located in Educational Service Center East and Board District 5 (Kayser).
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of this lease extension will allow the Central High School Program to continue providing educational
services to at-risk students in the Glassell Park, Elysian Valley, and Silver Lake areas for the next three school
years.
If the Board approves this action, staff will proceed with the extension of the lease for three years. If the Board
does not approve the proposed action, the District will be required to vacate the facility by June 30, 2014, and
suspend the service in this area if and until an alternative facility is secured.
The requested action does not impact current District policies.
Budget Impact:
Landlord: Louis J. Perez Trust
Location: 2812 Newell Street, Los Angeles, CA 90039
Rentable Area: 2,356 square feet
Proposed Term: July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017
Current Rent: $3,078.30 ($1.31 per square foot per month)
Proposed Rent: $3,200.00 ($1.36 per square foot per month) with $100 annual increases.
Termination Option: 90-day District only termination option with no penalty.
powered by Legistar
258
0123456789
Landlord: Louis J. Perez Trust
Location: 2812 Newell Street, Los Angeles, CA 90039
Rentable Area: 2,356 square feet
Proposed Term: July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017
Current Rent: $3,078.30 ($1.31 per square foot per month)
Proposed Rent: $3,200.00 ($1.36 per square foot per month) with $100 annual increases.
Termination Option: 90-day District only termination option with no penalty.
Term Fiscal Year
2014/2015
(12 Months)
Fiscal Year
2015/2016
(12 Months)
Fiscal Year
2016/2017
(12 Months)
Base Rent $38,400 $39,600 $40,800
Under the terms of the proposed lease extension, the District's total cost for use of the facility is $118,800.
Funding will be provided from the Central High School Program, Program Code 13983.
None.
Attachments:
None.
Informatives:
None.
powered by Legistar
259
0123456789
TAB 18
Authorization to Continue the Lease for the North Valley Occupational Center Satellite Facility at 16550
Saticoy Street on Van Nuys Airport Property
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education authorize the Chief Facilities Executive, and/or his designee(s), to
continue the month-to-month tenancy at an annual rate of one dollar, for the North Valley Occupational Center
Satellite Facility at the Van Nuys Airport located at 16550 Saticoy Street in the City of Los Angeles. Authority
currently granted to staff to continue execution of the lease expires on June 30, 2014. As such, staff requests
authorization to continue the month-to-month tenancy at an annual rate of one dollar beginning July 1, 2014,
and continue to lease this facility so long as the total amount paid does not exceed $100.
Background:
The Division of Adult and Career Education (DACE) has leased a 23,325 square foot building on 2.96 acres of
land at the Van Nuys Airport for the North Valley Occupational Center Satellite Facility since 1978. As of July
2013, the District was able to negotiate new terms on a short-term basis in recognition of the severe cuts to the
DACE budget and the value the program provides to the community at large and the onsite airport.
This facility is home to DACEs Airframe and Power Plant Mechanic Program (Aviation Program). The
Aviation Program enrolls approximately 100 adult and high school students annually. Upon completion of the
Aviation Program, graduates go on to seek certification from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as
aircraft engine and airframe mechanics. The operation of this site specific educational program is dependent on
its locational relationship to airport resources.
The site is located in ESC North and Board District 6 (Ratliff).
Expected Outcomes:
Authorization to continue the month-to-month tenancy at an annual rate of one dollar, so long as the total
amount paid does not-exceed $100. This will allow DACE to continue the Airframe and Power Plant Mechanic
program at the North Valley Occupational Center Satellite Facility located at the Van Nuys Airport.
If the Board approves this action, staff will continue the month-to-month lease at an annual rent of one dollar so
long as the total amount paid does not-exceed $100.
If the Board does not approve this proposed action, the District will be required to vacate the Van Nuys Airport
facility by June 30, 2014, and suspend the Aviation Program if and until an alternative specialty facility is
secured.
The requested action does not impact current District policies.
powered by Legistar
260
0123456789
Budget Impact:
Landlord: City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles World Airports
Location: 16550 Saticoy Street, Van Nuys, CA 91640
Rentable Area: 2.96 acres, including 23,325 square feet of instruction space
Proposed Term: Month-to-month starting on July 1, 2014, renewable
Current Rent: One dollar per year, paidin advance
Proposed Rent: One dollar per year, paid in advance, total rent payable not-to-exceed $100
Termination Option: 30 days by either party
The total amount, not-to-exceed $100, is to be provided from the Districts Adult Education Program Code
15119.
None.
Attachments:
None.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
261
0123456789
TAB 19
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve Four
Projects to Address Critical School Repair Needs
Action Proposed:
Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approve four projects to address critical school repair needs. The
total combined budget for these projects is $2,623,070. The scope, schedule and budget for the proposed
projects are listed below:
1. 135
th
Street Elementary School - Project to Address Deteriorated Roofing Systems
Educational Service Center South, Board District 1
Project Background and Scope - The roofing system on the lunch shelter, arcades, cafeteria building,
and 12 classroom buildings is more than 35 years old and consists of multiple layers and patches. The
project will replace the roofing systems on these buildings, and includes the installation of new metal
flashing, replacement of damaged wood, and painting to match existing areas affected in the roof
demolition.
Project Budget -- $595,331
Project Schedule - Construction is anticipated to begin in November 2014, and conclude in February
2015.
2. Bravo Medical Magnet - Project to Address Deteriorated Hot Water Storage Tank and Boiler
Educational Service Center East, Board District 2
Project Background and Scope - The campus consists of one five story building which houses all
operational equipment, including the hot water storage tank located on the fifth floor above the library,
administrative offices, and numerous classrooms. The tank is approximately 20 years old and in poor
condition with extensive visible corrosion. Previously the tank ruptured, flooding the building and
causing extensive water damage. The water in the tank is required to be stored at approximately 140
degrees Fahrenheit which poses a potential safety hazard in the event the tank were to rupture while the
school is occupied. The project will provide Bravo Medical Magnet with a new hot water storage tank
and boiler in a more appropriate location.
Project Schedule - Construction is anticipated to begin in April 2015, and conclude in July 2015.
3. Haskell Elementary School - Project to Address Deteriorated Roofing Systems
Educational Service Center North, Board District 3
Project Background and Scope - The roofing system on the lunch shelter and 16 classroom buildings is
more than 20 years old and consists of multiple layers and patches. The project will replace the roofing
systems on these buildings, and includes the installation of new metal flashing, replacement of damaged
powered by Legistar
262
0123456789
wood, and painting to match existing areas affected in the roof demolition.
Project Schedule - Construction is anticipated to begin in October 2014, and conclude in January 2015.
4. Sunny Brae Elementary School - Project to Address Deteriorated Flooring
Educational Service Center North, Board District 3
Project Background and Scope - The deteriorated asbestos-containing floor tiles are in poor condition
causing not only a tripping hazard, but a health hazard due to the risk of an asbestos release. The
project will replace the deteriorated flooring and abate the asbestos in various rooms located in the main
office building, auditorium and classroom buildings.
Project Schedule -Construction is anticipated to begin in July 2014, and conclude in September 2015.
Background:
On January 14, 2014, the Board of Education approved the establishment of the School Upgrade Program
(SUP), the next phase of the District's Bond Program which will modernize, build and repair school facilities to
improve student health, safety and educational quality. The Board's action approved the overarching goals and
principles, funding sources, specific categories of need, and spending targets for the SUP. In total,
$7,852,970,000 was allocated to support the development of projects under the SUP.
The SUP includes a spending target to address "Critical School Repair and Safety Improvements to School
Building Components." Projects developed under this category of need are included in the Facilities Services
Division Strategic Execution Plan. The four proposed projects to address critical school repair needs are
necessary to improve student health, safety and educational quality.
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will approve the proposed action to define and approve four
projects to address critical school repair needs that will improve student health, safety and educational quality.
A yes vote will authorize staff to proceed with the expenditure of bond funds to undertake the four proposed
projects in accordance with the provisions set forth in Measures K, R, Y and Q. If the proposed action is not
approved, bond funds will not be expended and critical school repair needs will remain unaddressed.
These actions are consistent with the Districts commitment to address unmet school facilities needs and
provide students with a safe and healthy learning environment.
Budget Impact:
The total combined budget for the four critical school repair projects is $2,623,070. The projects will be
funded by Bond Program funds earmarked specifically for critical school repair and safety improvements to
school building components.
It may be necessary to undertake feasibility studies, site analysis, scoping, and/or due diligence activities on the
proposed projects prior to initiating design. As necessary, the Office of Environmental Health and Safety
(OEHS) will evaluate the proposed projects in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) to ensure compliance. If through the planning and design process it is determined that the proposed
powered by Legistar
263
0123456789
project scope(s) will not sufficiently address the critical need identified, the project scope, schedule, and budget
will be revised accordingly.
meeting of May 29, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed FSD SEP amendment will facilitate
implementation of the FSD SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to successfully
complete the FSD SEP.
Attachments:
None.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
264
0123456789
265
0123456789
266
0123456789
TAB 20
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve Four
Pilot/Small School Facilities Reconfiguration and Upgrade Projects
Action Proposed:
Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approve four pilot/small school facilities reconfiguration and
upgrade projects, and authorize the Chief Facilities Executive, and/or his designee, to make any associated
purchases.
Each of the proposed projects will reconfigure and upgrade existing school facilities to create a separate
and distinct space for the operation of a Board-approved autonomous pilot/small school. Projects include
various facilities renovations and reconfigurations, technology and telecommunication infrastructure
upgrades, and equipping the facility with furniture, fixtures and equipment. Project scopes, schedules and
budgets vary depending on site conditions and individual needs/requirements of each specialized
instructional program. The proposed projects are listed below:
- Reconfigure and upgrade eight classrooms and one administrative office at Hollenbeck Middle School
to create separate and distinct facilities space to enable the successful operation of Boyle Heights
Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) High School. The proposed project budget
is $335,688. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 2014, and to be completed in July 2014. The
project is in Educational Service Center ISIC, and Board District 2 (Garca).
- Reconfigure and upgrade 13 classrooms and one administrative office at Jefferson High School to
create separate and distinct facilities space to enable the successful operation of Nava College
Preparatory High School. The proposed project budget is $516,511. Construction is anticipated to
begin in June 2014, and to be completed in July 2014. The project is in Educational Service Center
ISIC, and Board District 5 (Kayser).
- Reconfigure and upgrade 16 classrooms, three administrative offices, and two counseling offices at
Lincoln High School to create separate and distinct facilities space to enable the successful operation
of Academy of Environmental and Social Policy (ESP) High School. The proposed project budget is
$320,400. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 2014, and to be completed in July 2014. The
school is in Educational Service Center East, and Board District 2 (Garca).
- Reconfigure and upgrade seven classrooms, two administrative offices, and four closets/workrooms at
Westchester High School to create a separate and distinct facilities space to enable the successful
operation of the Incubator School. The proposed project budget is $235,440. Construction is
anticipated to begin in June 2014, and to be completed in July 2014. The project is in Educational
Service Center ISIC, and Board District 4 (Zimmer).
The total combined budget for these projects is $1,599,703, of which $1,408,039 will be funded by Bond
powered by Legistar
267
0123456789
Program funds earmarked for specialized instructional programs in the School Upgrade Program (SUP), and
the remaining $191,664 will be funded with General Funds.
Background:
The Board of Education approved the Office of Intensive Support and Intervention's recommendations to
establish the Incubator School (BOE #221-12/13), ESP High School (BOE #362-09/10), and the Boyle Heights
STEM High School and Nava College Preparatory High School (BOE #204-13/14). The proposed projects are
necessary to enable the successful operation of autonomous pilot/small schools, beginning at start of the 2014-
2015 school year.
On January 14, 2014, the Board of Education approved the establishment of the School Upgrade Program
(SUP), the next phase of the District's Bond Program which will modernize, build and repair school facilities to
improve student health, safety and educational quality. The Board's action approved the overarching goals and
principles, funding sources, specific categories of need, and spending targets for the SUP. In total,
$7,852,970,000 was allocated to support the development of projects under the SUP.
The SUP includes a spending target to address "School Upgrades and Reconfigurations to Support Specialized
Instructional Programs." Projects developed under this category of need are included in the Facilities Services
Division Strategic Execution Plan. The four proposed projects to reconfigure and upgrade existing school
facilities to create a separate and distinct space for the operation of Board-approved autonomous pilot/small
schools meet the requirements of this spending target and are necessary to ensure student health, safety and
educational quality.
Pilot/small schools are established to provide models of educational excellence that will help foster widespread
educational reform throughout LAUSD. They are located on school campuses, and classroom space is
reconfigured to accommodate the designated student population. The Division of Intensive Support and
Intervention identified four reconfiguration and upgrade projects for the 2014-2015 school year to support the
creation and operation of autonomous pilot/small schools.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of the proposed action to allow the execution of four pilot/small school facilities reconfiguration and
upgrade projects. When construction is complete, each pilot/small school can operate independently from the
Districts co-located site.
With approval of this proposed action, Bond Program funds earmarked for school upgrades and
reconfigurations to support specialized instructional programs will be made available to immediately execute
the proposed projects. These facilities improvements will increase the likelihood that the District school and
pilot/small school will successfully and safely operate their separate instructional programs on a single school
site, with minimal interference and disruption to their respective educational programs.
If yes vote, the FSD-SEP will be amended and the District will utilize Bond Program funds earmarked for
school upgrades and reconfigurations to support specialized instructional programs to execute the four
proposed projects.
If no vote, the District will need to identify another funding source to meet operational needs of the
Pilot/small school program.
This action does not change District policies. It is consistent with the Districts commitment to address unmet
school facilities needs, provide students with a safe and healthy learning environment, and support specialized
powered by Legistar
268
0123456789
instructional opportunities to its students.
Budget Impact:
The total combined budget for the proposed projects is $1,599,703. Bond Program funds earmarked for
specialized instructional programs in the SUP will fund $1,408,039 of the budget, and the remaining $191,664
will be funded with General Funds.
Pilot/small schools are established to provide models of educational excellence that will help foster widespread
educational reform throughout LAUSD. Bond Program funds have been earmarked for school upgrades and
reconfigurations to support specialized instructional programs such as these four pilot/small schools.
Attachments:
None.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
269
0123456789
270
0123456789
271
0123456789
TAB 21
Approval of the Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center [Public
Hearing]
Action Proposed:
Staff of the Charter Schools Division recommends approval of the renewal with benchmarks, of the charter for
Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center School for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2014 until June 30,
2019, to serve 650 students in grades K-5 in each year of the charter term.
Background:
On April 2, 2014, Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center School (Alexander Science Center) submitted
its affiliated charter renewal petition application to the Charter Schools Division. The charter petition and
supporting documents were reviewed by the Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and
other District staff. The 90-day statutory timeline due to wavier for Board action on this petition continues
until Tuesday, July 1, 2014.
In accordance with Education Code sections 47605 and 47607, the Charter Schools Division considers the
following criteria when reviewing a renewal petition submitted by a charter school:
Confirmation that the charter schools performance has met the minimum criteria under Education Code
section 47607(b), including considering increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of
pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to grant a
charter renewal;
Review of the charter petition to assess the soundness of the educational program; ensure it contains the
required affirmations; and ensure it contains reasonably comprehensive descriptions of the 16 elements;
Assessment that the petitioners are demonstrably likely to successfully implement the program;
Confirmation of the academic, operational, and fiscal soundness of the charter school based on the
Charter Schools Division oversight and the schools achievement results on the Districts School
Performance Framework.
Academic Renewal Criteria:
Education Code section 47607 requires authorizing entities to consider increases in pupil academic
achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining
whether to grant a charter renewal.
The Charter Schools Division must confirm whether the charter school has met at least one of the below
minimum criteria set forth in Education Code 47607(b) for schools in operation at least four years. Moreover,
as stated above, Education Code section 47607 requires the authorizing Board of Education to consider
powered by Legistar
272
0123456789
as stated above, Education Code section 47607 requires the authorizing Board of Education to consider
increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most
important factor in determining whether to grant a charter renewal.
1. Attained its Academic Performance Index (API) growth target in the prior year or in two of the last
three years both schoolwide and for all groups of pupils served by the charter school; or
2. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API in the prior year or in two of the last three years; or
3. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API for a demographically comparable school in the
prior year or in two of the last three years; or
4. (A) The entity that granted the charter determines that the academic performance of the charter
school is at least equal to the academic performance of the public schools that the charter school
pupils would otherwise have been required to attend, as well as the academic performance of the
schools in the school district in which the charter school is located, taking into account the
composition of the pupil population that is served at the charter school.
(B) The determination made pursuant to this paragraph shall be based upon all of the following:
(i) Documented and clear and convincing data.
(ii) Pupil achievement data from assessments, including, but not limited to, the Standardized Testing
and Reporting Program established by Article 4 (commencing with Section 60640) for
demographically similar pupil populations in the comparison schools.
(iii) Information submitted by the charter school.
Staff has determined that Alexander Science Center has met minimum academic performance criteria for
renewal, inclusive of analysis of data presented under Education Code section 47607(b)4.
Alexander Science Center is an affiliated charter school which serves students in grades K-5 in Board District
1, Educational Service Center West (ESCW), at 3737 S. Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA 90007. The schools
current enrollment is 638 students in grades K-5.
Alexander Science Center was originally approved by the Board of Education in October 2003 to open in 2004
and renewed in 2009. For the proposed 2014-2019 charter term, the school will serve up to approximately 650
students in grades K-5. The schools program includes a partnership with the California Science Center for a
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math focus (STEM) and a Dual Language program in Spanish. By
design, the school collaboratively serves students from the combined attendance boundaries of Vermont EL,
Weemes EL, Norwood EL, Normandie EL, Menlo EL, John Mack EL, Jones Primary Center, South Region EL
#10, and King Jr. EL schools. During the current charter term of 2009-2014, the schools student body has
reflected the community in which it operates. According to October 2012 CDE data, the schools
demographics are approximately 74% Latino, 22% African American, 1% Asian, and 1% White. As a District
affiliated charter school, Alexander Science Center will implement the provisions of the Master Plan for
English Learners and comply with all applicable federal and state laws, District policies and procedures related
to the implementation of the English Learner Master Plan including the schools Dual Language program.
Alexander Science Center has met one of the four minimum academic performance criteria for renewal
required under Education Code section 47607(b) as evidenced below in the Summary of School Performance.
The school did not meet API targets, State and Similar Schools ranks criteria and thus has not met the first three
criteria as outlined in 47607(b). The schools 2012-13 API is 766. The State Rank is 3 and Similar Schools
Rank is 2. However the school has met the fourth criteria of EC 47607(b)(4). The school has performed
strongly in comparison to Resident Schools. Data from the Office of Data and Accountability indicates that the
Science Center schools API of 766 is above the Resident Schools Median API of 739. The Science Center
School achieved 44% school-wide proficiency in ELA on the CST while the Resident Schools Median was
powered by Legistar
273
0123456789
School achieved 44% school-wide proficiency in ELA on the CST while the Resident Schools Median was
37%. In the area of Math, the Science Center School achieved 56% school-wide proficiency while the Resident
Schools Median was 53%. The schools Academic Growth Over Time for 2012-13 was above the District
average in English Language Arts and within the District Average for Mathematics.
The District-wide School Performance Framework (SPF) classification is another criterion considered when
reviewing a charter school renewal petition. According to the 2013 SPF, Alexander Science Center has been
classified as a Watch school, which is the second lowest tier of five possible tiers of performance. The
schools placement in this tier is a result of the schools lower levels of achievement in CST proficiency in
schoolwide ELA and Math and in Third grade reading proficiency. The school did earn a higher level of status
points on the School Performance Framework for Special Education students participation in general
education. (See Summary of Charter School Performance.)
Alexander Science Center attributes its past academic performance to previous and specific organizational
challenges including establishing continuity in key leadership and the instructional team positions due to
turnover in the Principal position as well as staff turnover during the budget crisis. These challenges
contributed to the schools inability to effectively and consistently deliver the high achieving instructional
program and innovations outlined in the charter. ESC West leadership continues to work closely with the
schools new leadership to support positive changes and growth in student achievement.
In response to these organizational challenges and recognition of the need to improve the schools instructional
programs and academic outcomes, the school and ESC leadership, in partnership with the California Science
Center have made significant and strategic changes. These positive changes support the school community in
achieving their goal of becoming a National Model School for Science, its designation by the District as a lab
school for other schools to visit for implementation of Common Core State Standards beginning in 2014-15,
and the Charter Schools Divisions recommendation for renewal with benchmarks.
The Principal and California Science Center have a strong collaborative partnership and formal organizational
structures have been established to facilitate this ongoing collaboration. Structures include weekly planning
meetings between the Principal and Science Center representative, joint classroom walk-throughs, feedback
regarding the Science Center Liaisons who work with each grade level, science themed projects, and
collaboration about implementation of instructional strategies. The partnership also includes strong
involvement from the Educational Service Center West in a collaborative manner that supports the mission and
vision of both the district and the charter petition. A school-wide needs assessment initiated by the Principal in
collaboration with the staff, has resulted in professional development focused on the implementation of
essential charter petition components, dual language implementation, technology, and Science Center inquiry
based learning focused on increasing student achievement. Specific teacher teams were created specifically to
serve as resource leaders in sharing information with the entire staff in the areas of Science, Technology, and
Dual Language. New structures also include a Common Core trained teacher per grade level to serve as the
grade level leader in supporting the implementation of Common Core State Standards. The data analysis
component of the needs assessment has yielded new support structures created for students and parents in the
dual language program (i.e. parent support group, after school intervention) and a refined process for
implementing and following up on grade level and classroomaction plans targeting student needs. The positive
direction of the school is also apparent in its designation by the District as a lab school for other schools to visit
for implementation of Common Core State Standards beginning in 2014-15.
Best practices are routinely shared among the staff as a part of their on-going self-reflection on data analysis
from benchmark assessments. After benchmark assessments, time is set aside for grade levels to collaborate
around a staff member(s) who had success with students on a particular concept and develop action plans and
powered by Legistar
274
0123456789
around a staff member(s) who had success with students on a particular concept and develop action plans and
calibration around the strategys implementation. The collaboration does not occur only at grade level, but
structured time for vertical articulation occurs also to additionally share best practices across all grades. The
resultant action plans are reviewed and monitored by the principal on a six to eight week cycle.
Targeted intervention strategies include each teacher implementing specific strategies for identified students on
four to six week cycles based on assessment tools such as DIBELS, BURST, and Envision Math. Intervention
occurs within the classroom, in small groups, in afterschool settings, and with the support of an Intervention
teacher with an evaluation about the students needs and next steps occurring at the end of the cycle. The
school has allocated funding toward CELDT preparation for English Learners, English Learner intervention,
and afterschool intervention to improve student achievement.
As a high quality authorizer, LAUSD strives to share and leverage promising and innovative practices across
LAUSD schools to help generate innovation and improve educational outcomes for all students. The school
has exhibited some of the following promising practices:
1) Science Center School teachers work with the California Science Center Specialists (Liaisons)
three times a year to execute three, six to eight week science cycles featuring FOSS Investigations
every year. These investigations include lab projects that every student participates in as a
baseline, and includes the inquiry process. Students frequent the Natural History Museum and
California Science Center to solidify their knowledge of complicated scientific processes.
2) Teachers have incorporated the National Technology Standards into their daily curriculum. Each
grade level has created three benchmark technology projects that students will successfully
complete every year.
Accordingly, Staff recommends the renewal based on the positive trajectory in multiple areas established by the
stable collaborative leadership team of the Principal, California Science Center, and ESC West. The positive
trajectory is evident in the schools implementation of formal and consistent systems targeting increased
student achievement and self-reflection. It is also evident in the schools implementation of instruction focused
on higher level thinking skills through Science, the schools transition to Common Core State Standards, and
the schools identification as a lab school beginning in 2014-15.
The petition is available for perusal in the Charter Schools Division and online at the Districts Board of
Education website at <http://laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions>.
Expected Outcomes:
Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center School is expected to operate its charter school in a manner
consistent with District policy, local, state, and federal ordinances, laws and regulations and with the terms and
conditions set forth in its petition, as well as the noted benchmark to improve the schools academic
performance. The measurable pupil outcomes and method by which pupil progress toward outcomes will be
measured as are set forth in the charter petition.
Yes - The approval of the renewal of the charter term for five (5) years would grant the Dr. Theodore T.
Alexander Science Center School the right to continue to operate as a charter school under the terms of the
renewal petition for a five (5) year period beginning July 1, 2014.
powered by Legistar
275
0123456789
No - The denial of the renewal of the charter term would cause the charter to expire on June 30, 2014, unless
Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center School appeals the denial and the charter is granted by the Los
Angeles County Board of Education or the California State Board of Education. This Board Report No. 390 -
13/14 and accompanying documents shall constitute the Board of Educations adopted written findings of fact
for the denial of the Dr. Theodore T. Alexander Science Center School renewal petition.
There are no policy implications at this time.
Budget Impact:
The petition is to establish an affiliated charter school. As an affiliated charter school, revenues will be received
by LAUSD on their behalf. Thus, the school becomes a locally-funded charter school. The District will allocate
school resources in the same manner as it does for non-charter schools except as otherwise specified in statute
and in the District Affiliated Policy Bulletin 5439.0.
All pending issues shall be resolved at the time of the Board meeting.
Attachments:
Desegregation Impact Statement
Informatives:
Not applicable.
powered by Legistar
276
0123456789
........ ,
- l ' ~ '
1 \
i . i
'-. .. ,/
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
DESEGREGATION IMPACT STATEMENT (DIS)
DR. THEODORE ALEXANDER SCIENCE CENTER SCHOOL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 390 - 13114
June 10,2014
I. Category of Proposed Action:
The proposed action will approve the renewal of the charter for Dr. Theodore Alexander Science Center
School, beginning July 1, 2014 until June 30, 2019 and provide a total of650 students served in grades K-5 in
years one through five of the charter term.
II. Summary Description of Current District Practice:
Charter schools are schools of choice by legislation and are open to any student in the State of Cal ifornia.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted, however,
that although State legislation allows students to attend a charter school from any area in the state, the Los
Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is under Court Order, Crawford v. LAUSD, which applies to all
schools within or chartered through the LAUSD. Any modifications to the Court-Ordered Integration Program
must first be approved by Student Integration Services.
III. Proposed Change:
The approval of this renewal of the charter would grant the charter of Dr. Theodore Alexander Science
Center School for five (5) years beginning July 1, 2014 until June 30, 2019.
IV. Effects of This Proposal:
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) does not guarantee availabi lity of Court-ordered
Integration funding. The charter school will be responsible for maintaining the Court Order and providing
information requested by the LAUSD as set forth in the Charter petition. Modifications or school decisions
cannot negatively impact or cause additional costs to the Court-ordered Integration budget.
V. Analyze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation. Re-segregation andlor Segregation:
If the Charter goals are met, there should be positive results on the five (5) Harms of Racial Isolation which are
low academic ach ievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opportunit ies, interracial
hostility and intolerance, and overcrowded conditions. The Court-ordered Integration Program for
participating students will operate under various Court Orders for schools within the Los Angeles Unified
School District. Any modification of the Court-ordered Integration Program must first be approved by Student
Integration Services.
VI. If proposed action affects negativelv any desegregation program, list other option(s) identified:
If the District Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
District' s Court-ordered Integration Program.
PREPARED BY:
Specialist
Charter Schools Division
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 390 - 13/ 14
APPROVED BY:
MODESTA J. BA SITY
Interim Director
Page I of I Board of Education
June 10, 2014
277
0123456789
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 390 13/14 Page 1of 1 Board of Education
J une 10, 2014
BENCHMARKS
DR. THEODORE T. ALEXANDER SCIENCE CENTER
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 390 13/14
J UNE 10, 2014
INSTRUCTIONAL:
1. During the 2014-15 Charter Schools Division annual oversight review, the Dr. Theodore
Alexander Science Center School will provide the CSD with a comprehensive written
description of initiatives implemented specifically to improve the proficiencies of subgroup
performance of African Americans, English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, and
Latino students. The description will include a written analysis of each benchmark assessment
by subgroupin both English Language Arts and Mathematics.
2. When the base API becomes available from the California Department of Education, the Dr.
Theodore Alexander Science Center School will provide the CSD a written analysis comparing
its base API, to CDE Similar Schools and the nine LAUSD Resident Schools as a component of
theoversight visit.
278
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
SUMMARY OF CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
DR. THEODORE ALEXANDER SCIENCE CENTER SCHOOL
J une 10, 2014
The Charter Schools Division has analyzed the performance of the charter school using established
criteria in the following four areas:
I. Student Achievement and Educational Performance
II. Governance and Organizational Management
III. Fiscal Operations
IV. Fulfillment of the Charters Educational Program
I. Student Achievement and Educational Performance
First, the Charter Schools Division must confirmwhether the charter school has met at least one of the
following minimum criteria set forth in Education Code 47607(b) for schools in operation at least four
years:
1. Attained its Academic Performance Index (API) growth target in the prior year or in two of the
last three years, both schoolwide and for all groups of pupils served by the charter school; or
2. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API in the prior year or in two of the last three
years; or
3. Ranked in deciles 4 to 10, inclusive, on the API for a demographically comparable school in the
prior year or in two of the last three years; or
4. (A) The entity that granted the charter determines that the academic performance of the charter
school is at least equal to the academic performance of the public schools that the charter
school pupils would otherwise have been required to attend, as well as the academic
performance of the schools in the school district in which the charter school is located,
taking into account the composition of the pupil population that is served at the charter
school.
(B) The determination made pursuant to this paragraph shall be based upon all of the
following:
(i). Documented and clear and convincing data.
(ii). Pupil achievement data from assessments, including, but not limited to, the
Standardized Testing and Reporting Program established by Article 4 (commencing
with Section 60640) for demographically similar pupil populations in the comparison
schools.
(iii). Information submitted by the charter school.
Note: If a charter school has not been in operation for at least four years, this section of Education Code
serves as reference. The Charter Schools Division will present findings based on its analysis of the
schools performance data to date, and of the academic, operational, and fiscal soundness of the charter
school based onCharter Schools Division oversight.
279
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
Dr. Theodore Alexander Science School (Alexander Science Center) has met theminimum statutory
requirement as evidenced in the Data Summary Report.
Student Discipline
Discipline and expulsion policies used at District schools must comply with the California Education
Code. LAUSD charter schools must comply with the provisions related to suspensions and expulsions
that are put forth in the Charter Schools Divisions Required Language for Charter Petitions. Alexander
Science Centers grounds for student suspension and expulsion are the same as the Districts and thus
aligned with those listed in Education Code Section 48900 et seq. As the data below shows, the school
had 2 suspensions and 0 expulsions for the 2012-13 school year. In 2011-12 school year, the school
reported 4suspensions and 0 expulsions. As of the date of this report, the school reports 1 suspension
and 0 expulsions for the current school year. The school reports that it has recently revised its
suspension and expulsion policies and procedures to ensure a more cohesive, clear, and effective process
for all stakeholders.
SUSPENSION/EXPULSION
Name of
School
Location
Code
Suspension
2013-14
As of the
date of this
report
Expulsion
2013-14
As of the
date of
this report
Suspension
2012-13
Expulsion
2012-13
Suspension
2011-12
Expulsion
2011-12
Alexander
Science
Center
5111 1 0 2 0 4 0
Special Education
According to the December 2012 CASEMIS report, Alexander Science Center enrolled Special
Education students at a rate that is slightly below the District average. The school had a special
education enrollment rate of 8%, which was three percentage points lower than the LAUSD Similar
Schools from CDE Median (11%). The school is committed to continuing its efforts to identify and
serve students with disabilities. The school provides both strategic and intensive targeted intervention as
needed for students. The school has implemented the Collaborative Learning Model (CLM) of full
inclusion to meet the unique learning and social needs of students with disabilities. This model includes
push in services, pullout when identified in the IEP, and regular collaboration between special
education and general education teachers to embed instructional strategies in the weekly lessons to
ensure access to the curriculum, delivery of services, andongoing progress monitoring.

OCT
2012
Enroll
#
S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

#
S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

%
%

H
i
g
h

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
%

L
o
w

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
#
A
U
T
#
D
B
#
D
E
A
F
#
E
D
#
E
M
D
#
H
O
H
#
M
R
#
O
H
I
*
#
O
I
#
S
L
D
*
#
S
L
I
*
#
T
B
I
#
V
I
638 50 8% 7% 1% 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 11 26 0 0
280
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
English Learners
The tables below represent the number of English Learners identified, served and reclassified by
Alexander Science Center. The schools October 2012 CALPADS English learner population of 30%
wasslightly higher than the LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median of 28%. Theschools2012-13
reclassification rate of 9.6% was lower than the LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median rate of
17.3%. In 2011-12 the school reclassified 24.3% of English Learners which was above the
reclassification rate of LAUSD Similar Schools Median 19.2%. In the past, the school was not
reviewing performance toward reclassification regularly and thus there is inconsistency in
reclassification rates over the last few years. However, the school now implements a system in which
the site level leadership team reviews the progress of English Learners quarterly for closer monitoring of
supports needed for English Learners and readiness for reclassification.
ESC BD
Loc
Code
School
T
o
t
a
l

E
n
r
o
l
l

#
%
F
/
R

M
e
a
l
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f
.

A
m
e
r
.
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
.
W 1 5111
Dr. Theodore Alexander Science
Center School
638 85% 3% 30% 74% 1% 22% 1% 0%
RECLASSIFICATION
2012-13
2011-12 #
EL
2012-13 #
Reclassified
2012-13
Reclassification
Rate
Change from
Prior Year
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander J r., Science Cent 177 17 9.6% -14.7%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 135 22 17.3% -1.9%
Resident Schools Median 368 33 9.0% -6.5%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 133 18 13.2% -5.7%
District 180,618 24,697 13.7% -1.7%
2011-12
2010-11 #
EL
2011-12 #
Reclassified
2011-12
Reclassification
Rate
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander J r., Science Cent 185 45 24.3%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 165 25 19.2%
Resident Schools Median 385 64 15.4%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 142 25 18.9%
District 194,904 29,956 15.4%
2010-11
2009-10 #
EL
2010-11 #
Reclassified
2010-11
Reclassification
Rate
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander J r., Science Cent 168 13 7.7%
District 205,312 26,080 12.7%
281
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
EVALUATION VISIT RESULTS
Following are definitions of the School PerformanceEvaluation ratings:
An evaluation of accomplished applies to operations characterized, overall, by strengths. There are very
few weaknesses and any that do exist do not diminish the students experience. While an evaluation of
accomplished represents a high standard of operating, it is a standard that should be achievable in all
schools. It implies that it is fully appropriate for a school to continue its operations without significant
adjustment. The school would always be expected, however, to continue to take advantage of
opportunities to improve.
An evaluation of proficient applies to operations characterized by a number of strengths. There are
weaknesses, but neither singly nor collectively do these have a significant adverse impact on the student
experience. An evaluation of proficient may be arrived at in a number of circumstances. The school
may provide a productive student experience, but it may not provide consistent challenge for students.
Typically operations will be characterized by strengths, but one or more weaknesses reduce the overall
quality of the student experience.
An evaluation of developing applies to operations characterized by weaknesses which require remedial
action by the school. Some, if not all, staff responsible for the operation evaluated as inadequate require
support from senior managers in planning and carrying out the necessary actions to effect improvement.
There may be some strengths, but these are overshadowed by the impact of the weaknesses.
An evaluation of unsatisfactory applies when there are major weaknesses in operation that require
immediate remedial action on the part of the school. The student experience is at risk in significant
respects. In almost all cases, staff responsible for operations evaluated unsatisfactory will require
support from senior managers in planning and carrying out the necessary actions to effect improvement.
This may involve working alongside effective peers in or beyond the school.
Charter Schools Division oversight deemed Student Achievement and Educational Performance at
the school to be Developing.
Areas of particular strength include:
On the measure of Academic Growth Over Time, the school scoredabove the District average in
English Language Arts.
On the measure of Academic Growth Over Time, the school scored within the District average in
Math.
On the measure of Academic Growth Over Time, the schools three year average is above the
District average in Science.
Areas recommended for improvement include:
Improve the schools rating on TheSchool Performance Framework (SPF) which isWatch.
Continue with targeted intervention and support so that subgroups meet API Growth Targets.
282
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
II. Governance and Organizational Management
Charter Schools Division oversight deemed Governance and Organizational Management at
the school to be Accomplished.
The collaborative partnership includes formal organizational structures such as weekly planning
meetings between the Principal and Science Center representative, joint classroom walk-
throughs, feedback regarding the Science Center Liaisons who work with each grade level.
A school-wide needs assessment initiated by the Principal in collaboration with the staff, has
resulted in professional development focused on increasing student achievement through the
implementation of essential charter petition components, dual language implementation,
technology, targeted intervention, andScience Center inquiry basedlearning.
The School Site Council actively reviews and monitors school performance and other data to
inform and evaluate decision-making. Document review and stakeholder interview with council
members demonstrates the Councils participation in creating and reviewingthe Single plan, and
connects regularly with the ELAC committee to review and consider recommendations regarding
the progress of English Learners.
The Governing and Operating (G & O) Committee regularly receives input of stakeholders
through its membership from parents, School Site Council Members, the California Science
Center, School Administration, and an Educational Service Center representative.
Areas recommended for improvement include:
It is recommended that the organization increase the frequency of the meetings of the G & O
Committee.
III. Fiscal Operations
Affiliated Charter Schools fiscal operations are overseen by Central Budget and the respective
Educational Service Center, thus the Charter Schools Division does not provide a rating in thisarea.
IV. Fulfillment of the Charters Educational Program
Charter Schools Division oversight deemed Fulfillment of the Charters Educational Program
at the school to be Proficient.
The school has implemented the educational program described in the charter in accordance with
the charters mission and vision, including most innovative components. Classroom observation,
document review, and stakeholder interview provide evidence that the school and California
Science Center have created structures to develop all staffs baseline knowledge and
implementation of Constructivism, CaliforniaScience Center Inquiry Based Instruction, Project
Based Learning, Dual Language programs and intervention.
283
0123456789
J une 10, 2014
The school has a professional development team dedicated to transition to Common Core State
Standards implementation and the school has been identified as a lab school for upcoming 2014-
15 year for other schools to visit to exemplify Common Core State Standards implementation.
Within the dual language program, the school has implemented new support structures such as a
parent support group and after school intervention to further strengthen the program and
students success.
Science Center School teachers work collaboratively with the California Science Center
Specialists (Liaisons) to execute three, six to eight week science cycles to deeply explore a
concept featuring FOSS Investigations every year. These investigations include lab projects in
which every student participates.
Areas noted for improvement include:
The school is encouraged to continue examining strategies to increase enrollment in the Dual
Language program at the upper grades.
Continue implementing the schools current focus on calibration of practices for foundational
components of the charter across all classrooms.
284
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

C
O
N
F
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

-

R
E
D
A
C
T
E
D
285
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
289
0123456789
102491
Schoolwide Academic Performance Index
(API)
Base API
Growth API
Growth Target
Growth
Met Schoolwide Growth Target
Met All Student Groups Target
Base API State Rank
Base API Similar Schools Rank
Subgroup API
Growth
Target
Growth Met Target
Growth
Target
Growth
Met
Target
Growth
Target
Growth
Met
Target
African American or Black 5 -31 No 5 35 Yes 5 -29 No
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - --
Asian - - - - --
Filipino - - - - --
Hispanic or Latino 5 0 No 5 10 Yes 5 -2 No
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander - - - - --
White - - - - --
Two or More Races - - - - --
English Learners 5 19 Yes 5 12 Yes 5 2 No
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 5 -5 No 5 18 Yes 5 -1 No
Students with Disabilities - - - - --
2011
Base API
2012
Growth API
11-12
Growth
2012
Base API
2013
Growth API
12-13
Growth
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 758 776 18 776 766 -10
CDE Similar Schools Median 842 840 -2 839 845 6
Resident Schools Median 746 733 -13 734 739 5
Comparison Schools Median 793 799 7 799 809 10
Basic, Below
Basic & Far
Below Basic
Proficient &
Advanced
Basic,
Below Basic
& Far Below
Basic
Proficient &
Advanced
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 56% 44% 44% 56%
CDE Similar Schools Median 39% 60% 26% 75%
Resident Schools Median 63% 37% 46% 53%
Comparison Schools Median 46% 55% 34% 66%
# Criteria # Met % Met # Criteria # Met % Met
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 21 16 76% 21 11 52%
CDE Similar Schools Median 17 13 62% 17 13 76%
Resident Schools Median 21 11 52% 21 14 67%
Comparison Schools Median 17 14 74% 21 14 74%
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent
Loc. Code: 5111
CDS Code:
CRITERIA SUMMARY
A charter school that has operated for at least four years is eligible for renewal only if the school has satisfied at least one of the following criteria prior to
receiving a charter renewal: Attained its Academic Performance Index (API) growth target in the prior year or in two of the last three years, both school wide and
for all groups of pupils served by the charter school; ranked 4 to 10 on the API statewide or similar schools rank in the prior year or in two of the last three years
both schoolwide and for all groups of pupils served by the charter school (SB 1290). The academic performance of the charter school must be at least equal to the
academic performance of the public schools that the charter school pupils would otherwise have been required to attend, as well as the academic performance
of the schools in the school district in which the charter school is located, taking into account the composition of pupil population served at the charter school
(Ed. Code 47607).
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
766 758 776
758 776 766
5 5 5
-8 18 -10
No Yes No
2012-13 CST Comparison
No Yes No
4 3 3
3 1 2
Blanks indicates that the subgroup is not numerically significant; therefore will have not API score or target information.
API Comparison
English Language Arts Mathematics
AYP Comparison
2012 AYP 2013 AYP
Office of Data and Accountability 5/19/2014
290
0123456789
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l

2
0
1
3

E
n
r
o
l
l

#

o
n

1
s
t

D
a
y

o
f

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

C
o
n
f

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

T
a
r
g
e
t
s
%

F
r
e
e
/

R
e
d
u
c
e
d

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f
.

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
3
9
7
K
-

5
7
7
6
7
6
6
3
2
N
o
N
o
4
1
1
0
7
2
2
1
8
7
2
1
2
3
1
0
1
0
2
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
4
7
K
-

5
8
5
0
8
5
0
7
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
5
3
7
2
0
1
4
3
3
9
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
7
4
K
-

6
7
8
1
7
5
7
4
3
N
o
N
o
4
9
1
8
1
3
2
2
1
7
8
7
3
1
2
5
1
0
0
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
5
K
-

5
8
5
6
8
7
3
7
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
4
7
1
0
1
4
2
9
1
5
5
8
2
2
1
1
5
2
0
0
2
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
1
6
K
-

5
8
0
7
8
0
1
5
4
Y
e
s
N
o
3
9
9
1
8
2
1
2
5
8
4
3
0
6
5
0
0
1
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
1
8
K
-

5
8
3
9
8
4
0
7
8
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
2
1
3
9
2
8
2
3
6
2
3
1
4
1
7
2
1
1
1
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
1
1
K
-

6
8
8
4
8
7
0
8
1
0
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
9
1
5
2
4
2
1
2
5
6
9
2
1
1
9
8
0
0
1
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
4
7
K
-

5
8
9
4
8
6
4
9
1
0
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
6
1
3
1
3
1
7
2
0
7
9
8
8
2
2
0
1
0
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
8
1
K
-

5
8
2
7
8
5
8
6
7
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
9
1
3
1
6
1
6
1
9
5
5
1
8
7
8
1
1
1
0
1
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
7
K
-

5
7
6
5
7
8
6
3
2
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
6
1
6
1
5
3
2
1
8
8
0
6
5
7
1
0
0
1
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
8
5
K
-

5
8
3
9
8
4
5
7
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
4
1
3
1
9
3
0
2
6
7
7
1
4
4
1
3
0
0
1
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
3
4
K
-

5
8
4
3
8
2
1
7
8
Y
e
s
N
o
5
9
7
9
6
9
3
4
1
1
4
3
6
3
0
0
2
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
2
8
5
-
8
3
9
8
4
5
7
8
-
-
6
6
1
3
1
5
2
1
2
0
7
7
6
5
6
3
0
0
1
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
2
7
K
-

5
6
7
1
6
9
8
1
2
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
6
1
2
4
4
2
1
9
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
7
6
K
-

5
7
4
1
7
5
0
2
4
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
9
1
1
6
2
4
2
3
7
0
0
2
8
1
0
1
0
1
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
9
9
K
-

5
7
8
3
7
5
4
4
9
N
o
N
o
7
9
1
8
7
4
0
2
5
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
1
0
0
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
9
5
K
-

5
7
3
4
7
3
9
2
4
Y
e
s
N
o
5
8
1
4
6
3
4
1
6
7
7
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
8
4
K
-

5
7
2
9
7
2
9
2
3
N
o
N
o
8
0
1
7
1
4
3
9
2
2
9
7
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
5
2
7
-
7
3
4
7
3
9
2
4
-
-
7
6
1
4
6
3
9
2
2
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
4
6
K
-

5
8
0
1
8
0
7
5
6
Y
e
s
N
o
6
8
2
0
8
1
4
1
3
4
6
5
1
1
4
2
6
2
6
0
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
7
4
K
-

6
7
8
1
7
5
7
4
3
N
o
N
o
4
9
1
8
1
3
2
2
1
7
8
7
3
1
2
5
1
0
0
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
2
3
K
-

5
7
6
9
7
8
3
3
6
Y
e
s
N
o
7
5
1
8
1
5
3
3
1
8
8
3
3
3
3
3
0
2
2
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
8
1
K
-

5
8
2
7
8
5
8
6
7
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
9
1
3
1
6
1
6
1
9
5
5
1
8
7
8
1
1
1
0
1
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
2
6
K
-

5
7
9
7
8
1
1
4
5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
0
1
4
8
2
8
2
4
8
1
6
6
3
4
0
0
1
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
7
1
K
-

5
8
5
0
8
4
8
7
1
0
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
5
0
2
5
1
1
2
4
2
0
7
3
4
5
7
1
0
1
0
1
P
e
t
i
t
i
o
n

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
3
2
5
-
7
9
9
8
0
9
5
6
-
-
6
4
1
8
1
2
2
3
1
9
7
7
5
6
4
8
1
0
1
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

W
I
T
H

C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N

S
C
H
O
O
L
S
T
h
i
s

p
a
g
e

d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s

t
h
e

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I
,

s
c
h
o
o
l

r
a
n
k
s
,

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I
,

a
n
d

t
h
e

d
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

r
e
p
r
t
.
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
A
n

a
s
t
e
r
i
s
k

(
*
)

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l

d
o
e
s

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
l
i
d

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I
.
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
291
0123456789
a
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
T
o
t
a
l

E
n
r
o
l
l

#
%

F
/
R

M
e
a
l
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f
.

A
m
e
r
.
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
.

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
6
3
8
8
5
%
3
%
3
0
%
7
4
%
1
%
2
2
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
8
1
5
8
6
%
1
0
%
2
1
%
9
9
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
5
8
5
%
5
%
2
8
%
8
9
%
3
%
1
%
2
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
0
6
8
6
%
6
%
3
4
%
5
6
%
2
6
%
1
1
%
5
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
0
9
9
8
2
%
1
0
%
3
0
%
8
7
%
4
%
0
%
6
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
8
6
7
0
%
3
%
3
7
%
6
3
%
3
%
1
2
%
1
9
%
1
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
9
8
2
%
1
2
%
2
8
%
7
1
%
2
%
1
%
2
0
%
6
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
9
5
7
3
%
7
%
2
2
%
7
8
%
1
0
%
6
%
3
%
3
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
5
7
0
%
8
%
2
3
%
5
8
%
1
9
%
5
%
9
%
8
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
7
6
6
6
%
1
0
%
3
9
%
7
8
%
6
%
5
%
8
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
9
6
7
%
1
1
%
3
4
%
7
6
%
1
5
%
3
%
2
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
5
7
6
1
%
4
%
8
%
3
4
%
1
0
%
4
7
%
5
%
3
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
4
3
9
7
3
%
8
%
2
8
%
7
6
%
6
%
5
%
5
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
9
2
8
2
%
2
%
5
0
%
8
0
%
0
%
1
9
%
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
8
4
6
7
5
%
3
%
3
0
%
7
1
%
0
%
2
8
%
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
1
5
8
0
%
3
%
5
3
%
8
1
%
0
%
1
8
%
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
9
3
4
9
0
%
2
%
4
4
%
7
7
%
0
%
2
2
%
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
0
2
7
1
%
6
%
4
7
%
9
6
%
0
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
7
9
2
8
0
%
3
%
4
7
%
8
0
%
0
%
1
9
%
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
C
h
a
r
t
e
r

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
1
5
6
5
%
4
%
1
7
%
4
5
%
5
%
1
1
%
6
%
2
2
%
2
%
9
%
0
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
5
8
5
%
5
%
2
8
%
8
9
%
3
%
1
%
2
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
2
5
7
8
%
8
%
4
1
%
8
6
%
3
%
4
%
3
%
3
%
0
%
2
%
0
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
5
7
0
%
8
%
2
3
%
5
8
%
1
9
%
5
%
9
%
8
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
0
0
9
1
%
4
%
3
9
%
7
8
%
7
%
6
%
4
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
5
9
1
%
5
%
3
5
%
7
3
%
2
%
4
%
9
%
9
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
C
h
a
r
t
e
r

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
5
0
8
8
2
%
5
%
3
1
%
7
6
%
4
%
4
%
5
%
6
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
T
h
i
s

p
a
g
e

d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s

K
-
1
2

e
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

n
u
m
b
e
r

a
n
d

p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s

o
f

s
e
l
e
c
t

s
u
b
g
r
o
u
p
s

a
s

o
f

O
c
t
o
b
e
r

2
0
1
2

C
e
n
s
u
s

D
a
y
.

%

o
f

E
n
g
l
i
s
h

L
e
a
r
n
e
r
s

(
E
L
s
)

i
s

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

b
y

d
i
v
i
d
i
n
g

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

E
L
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

o
n

t
h
e

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
1
3

L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e

C
e
n
s
u
s

b
y

t
h
e

O
c
t
o
b
e
r

2
0
1
2

C
e
n
s
u
s

e
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

n
u
m
b
e
r
.
O
C
T
O
B
E
R

2
0
1
2

C
A
L
P
A
D
S

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

W
I
T
H

C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N

S
C
H
O
O
L
S
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
292
0123456789
ESC BD
Loc
Code
School
09-10
EL #
10-11
Reclass #
10-11
Reclass
Rate
10-11
EL #
11-12
Reclass #
11-12
Reclass
Rate
11-12
EL #
12-13
Reclass #
12-13
Reclass
Rate
W 1 5111 Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science 168 13 8% 185 45 24% 177 17 10%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE
S 5 2589 Bryson Avenue Elementary 344 41 12% 247 59 24% 221 49 22%
E 5 2603 Buchanan Street Elementary 174 18 10% 165 40 24% 133 17 13%
N 3 2630 Burbank Boulevard Elementary 123 17 14% 132 22 17% 135 9 7%
N 6 2781 Canterbury Avenue Elementary 345 70 20% 353 81 23% 334 42 13%
S 7 3425 Denker Avenue Elementary 319 46 14% 317 61 19% 301 42 14%
E 5 3479 Dorris Place Elementary 105 13 12% 107 16 15% 95 18 19%
N 3 4849 Lemay Street Elementary 105 14 13% 106 22 21% 98 17 17%
N 3 5198 Mayall Street Elementary 128 24 19% 118 13 11% 132 28 21%
N 3 5233 Melvin Avenue Elementary 241 44 18% 212 34 16% 194 22 11%
N 6 6890 Stagg Street Elementary 177 39 22% 176 25 14% 165 30 18%
W 4 7712 Westport Heights Elementary 46 4 9% 40 11 28% 34 11 32%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 174 24 14% 165 25 19% 135 22 17%
Resident Schools
W 1 3808 Fifty-Second Street Elementary 409 42 10% 448 57 13% 418 40 10%
W 1 7151 Lenicia B. Weemes Elementary 414 70 17% 342 65 19% 305 56 18%
W 1 5247 Menlo Avenue Elementary 398 44 11% 385 66 17% 368 33 9%
W 1 5630 Normandie Avenue Elementary 415 30 7% 417 64 15% 423 28 7%
E 2 5699 Norwood Street Elementary 317 25 8% 363 56 15% 338 30 9%
Resident Schools Median 409 42 10% 385 64 15% 368 33 9%
Charter Comparison Schools
S 7 2473 Bonita Street Elementary 112 19 17% 82 18 22% 94 9 10%
E 5 2603 Buchanan Street Elementary 174 18 10% 165 40 24% 133 17 13%
N 6 4790 Lassen Elementary 239 21 9% 216 52 24% 205 11 5%
N 3 5198 Mayall Street Elementary 128 24 19% 118 13 11% 132 28 21%
N 3 5459 Nevada Avenue Elementary 195 30 15% 196 31 16% 190 26 14%
W 4 7425 Van Ness Avenue Elementary 86 13 15% 76 7 9% 84 19 23%
Charter Comparison Schools Median 151 20 15% 142 25 19% 133 18 13%
RECLASSIFICATION RATES WITH COMPARISON SCHOOLS
a
This page displays the number of English learners (ELs), the number of students reclassified since the prior Census Day, and
the reclassification rate for each specified year. The numbers used are from the Language Census collected by the state each
March. The reclassification rate is calculated by dividing the number reclassified by the number of prior year ELs.
293
0123456789
2012-13 2011-12 # EL
2012-13 #
Reclassified
2012-13
Reclassification
Rate
Change from Prior
Year
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 177 17 9.6% -14.7%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 135 22 17.3% -1.9%
Resident Schools Median 368 33 9.0% -6.5%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 133 18 13.2% -5.7%
District 180,618 24,697 13.7% -1.7%
2011-12 2010-11 # EL
2011-12 #
Reclassified
2011-12
Reclassification
Rate
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 185 45 24.3%
District 194,904 29,956 15.4%
2010-11 2009-10 # EL
2010-11 #
Reclassified
2010-11
Reclassification
Rate
Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent 168 13 7.7%
District 205,312 26,080 12.7%
RECLASSIFICATION OF ENGLISH LEARNERS WITH COMPARISON SCHOOLS' MEDIANS
This page displays the number of English learners (ELs), the number of students reclassified since the prior
Census Day and the reclassification rate for each specified year. The numbers used are from the Language
Census collected by the state each March. The reclassification rate is calculated by dividing the number
reclassified by the number of prior year ELs.
294
0123456789
a
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
O
C
T

2
0
1
2

E
n
r
o
l
l

#
S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

#
S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

%
%

H
i
g
h

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
%

L
o
w

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
#

A
U
T
#

D
B

#

D
E
A
F
#

E
D
#

E
M
D
#

H
O
H

#

M
R

#

O
H
I
*
#

O
I
#

S
L
D
*

#

S
L
I
*
#

T
B
I
#

V
I

W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
6
3
8
5
0
8
%
7
%
1
%
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
0
1
1
2
6
0
0
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
8
1
5
6
1
7
%
7
%
1
%
6
0
0
0
0
0
2
7
0
3
0
1
6
0
0
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
5
8
1
1
5
%
1
1
%
4
%
1
8
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
1
3
2
2
3
0
0
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
0
6
3
8
9
%
6
%
3
%
9
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
1
8
1
3
0
0
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
0
9
9
8
4
8
%
5
%
3
%
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
2
5
2
5
0
0
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
8
6
9
4
1
2
%
9
%
3
%
1
9
0
0
1
0
0
1
7
1
2
9
3
6
0
0
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
9
3
4
1
1
%
1
0
%
1
%
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
8
0
0
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
9
5
6
4
1
6
%
1
2
%
4
%
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
5
5
3
1
2
%
8
%
5
%
4
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
6
1
2
2
5
0
0
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
7
6
7
0
1
5
%
6
%
8
%
3
8
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
0
1
2
1
4
0
0
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
9
5
0
1
1
%
8
%
3
%
8
0
0
0
0
1
6
2
0
1
6
1
7
0
0
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
5
7
3
1
9
%
3
%
6
%
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
5
0
0
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
4
3
9
6
1
1
1
%
8
%
3
%
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
2
1
1
6
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
9
2
1
0
0
1
3
%
8
%
5
%
3
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
6
2
5
0
0
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
8
4
6
8
9
1
1
%
6
%
5
%
1
6
0
0
7
1
1
1
4
9
0
2
2
1
9
0
0
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
1
5
8
1
1
3
%
7
%
6
%
1
3
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
7
0
3
3
5
0
0
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
9
3
4
1
3
2
1
4
%
9
%
5
%
3
3
0
0
5
0
0
4
2
9
3
3
2
2
6
0
0
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
7
0
2
8
8
1
3
%
9
%
3
%
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
5
1
9
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
7
9
2
8
9
1
3
%
8
%
5
%
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
4
1
1
0
3
2
1
9
0
0
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
1
5
7
2
1
4
%
1
0
%
3
%
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
6
3
2
5
2
3
0
1
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
5
8
1
1
5
%
1
1
%
4
%
1
8
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
1
3
2
2
3
0
0
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
2
5
7
5
1
4
%
8
%
6
%
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
3
0
6
0
0
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
5
5
3
1
2
%
8
%
5
%
4
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
6
1
2
2
5
0
0
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
0
0
9
1
1
8
%
1
0
%
8
%
3
4
0
0
1
0
0
2
8
2
2
5
1
9
0
0
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
5
4
3
1
7
%
1
2
%
5
%
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
8
0
5
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

i
n

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
e
d
i
a
n
5
0
8
7
4
1
5
%
1
0
%
5
%
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
1
2
5
1
4
0
0
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
T
h
i
s

p
a
g
e

d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s

t
h
e

K
-
1
2

e
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

t
o
t
a
l

(
a
s

o
f

O
c
t
o
b
e
r

2
0
1
2
)

a
n
d

t
h
e

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

K
-
1
2

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s

i
n

t
o
t
a
l
,

b
y

i
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e

c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
,

a
n
d

b
y

e
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y

a
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

o
n

t
h
e

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
2

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m

(
C
A
S
E
M
I
S
)

R
e
p
o
r
t
.

H
i
g
h

i
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e

e
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s

a
r
e

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d

b
y

a
n

a
s
t
e
r
i
s
k

(
*
)
.

K
-
1
2

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N

S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S

W
I
T
H

C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

(
D
E
C
E
M
B
E
R

2
0
1
2

C
A
S
E
M
I
S

R
E
P
O
R
T
)
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
295
0123456789
A
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
#

T
e
s
t
e
d
%

F
a
r

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
a
s
i
c
%

P
r
o
f
%

A
d
v
%

B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%

P
r
o
f

/
A
d
v
#

T
e
s
t
e
d
%

F
a
r

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
a
s
i
c
%

P
r
o
f
%

A
d
v
%

B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%

P
r
o
f

/
A
d
v
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
3
8
3
7
%
1
7
%
3
2
%
2
8
%
1
6
%
5
6
%
4
4
%
3
8
4
3
%
2
0
%
2
1
%
3
2
%
2
4
%
4
4
%
5
6
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
2
7
3
%
6
%
3
0
%
3
4
%
2
6
%
3
9
%
6
0
%
5
2
5
2
%
6
%
1
5
%
3
3
%
4
4
%
2
3
%
7
7
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
4
3
8
%
1
3
%
2
9
%
2
9
%
2
1
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
3
4
4
6
%
2
0
%
2
1
%
2
5
%
2
8
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
4
5
4
%
7
%
2
7
%
2
4
%
3
8
%
3
8
%
6
2
%
2
4
6
2
%
7
%
1
1
%
3
1
%
4
8
%
2
0
%
7
9
%
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
8
1
7
%
1
3
%
3
0
%
2
9
%
2
2
%
5
0
%
5
1
%
6
8
4
3
%
1
4
%
1
9
%
2
9
%
3
5
%
3
6
%
6
4
%
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
7
7
3
%
1
0
%
2
6
%
3
3
%
2
8
%
3
9
%
6
1
%
4
7
8
2
%
7
%
1
7
%
2
8
%
4
6
%
2
6
%
7
4
%
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
9
9
2
%
7
%
2
5
%
3
5
%
3
1
%
3
4
%
6
6
%
1
9
6
1
%
5
%
1
6
%
2
9
%
4
9
%
2
2
%
7
8
%
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
3
7
0
%
9
%
3
0
%
3
6
%
2
5
%
3
9
%
6
1
%
2
3
8
0
%
4
%
1
4
%
3
5
%
4
7
%
1
8
%
8
2
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
6
4
%
6
%
2
5
%
3
5
%
3
0
%
3
5
%
6
5
%
2
6
6
0
%
8
%
1
2
%
3
2
%
4
7
%
2
0
%
7
9
%
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
1
8
9
%
1
5
%
2
5
%
2
7
%
2
4
%
4
9
%
5
1
%
3
1
9
4
%
1
6
%
1
9
%
2
5
%
3
6
%
3
9
%
6
1
%
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
5
4
%
8
%
2
9
%
3
7
%
2
3
%
4
1
%
6
0
%
2
6
8
1
%
7
%
1
8
%
3
5
%
4
0
%
2
6
%
7
5
%
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
3
0
4
%
1
0
%
3
0
%
3
2
%
2
3
%
4
4
%
5
5
%
2
3
0
3
%
1
1
%
1
9
%
3
1
%
3
6
%
3
3
%
6
7
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
2
6
6
4
%
9
%
2
9
%
3
3
%
2
5
%
3
9
%
6
0
%
2
6
8
2
%
7
%
1
7
%
3
1
%
4
4
%
2
6
%
7
5
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
8
6
1
5
%
2
1
%
3
3
%
2
1
%
9
%
6
9
%
3
0
%
4
8
6
8
%
2
2
%
2
5
%
2
4
%
2
0
%
5
5
%
4
4
%
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
7
9
%
1
8
%
3
0
%
2
9
%
1
4
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
5
3
7
5
%
1
9
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
2
4
%
4
6
%
5
3
%
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
4
2
1
3
%
1
4
%
3
6
%
2
1
%
1
6
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
3
4
6
4
%
1
1
%
2
0
%
3
3
%
3
2
%
3
5
%
6
5
%
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
3
4
1
4
%
1
7
%
3
0
%
2
7
%
1
2
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
5
3
3
5
%
1
7
%
2
1
%
3
0
%
2
7
%
4
3
%
5
7
%
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
4
2
1
2
%
2
1
%
3
0
%
2
5
%
1
2
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
4
4
7
7
%
1
8
%
2
2
%
2
6
%
2
7
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
4
8
6
1
3
%
1
8
%
3
0
%
2
5
%
1
2
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
4
8
6
5
%
1
8
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
2
7
%
4
6
%
5
3
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
1
3
5
%
8
%
3
0
%
3
3
%
2
4
%
4
3
%
5
7
%
3
1
5
3
%
1
0
%
2
0
%
3
0
%
3
6
%
3
3
%
6
6
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
4
3
8
%
1
3
%
2
9
%
2
9
%
2
1
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
3
4
4
6
%
2
0
%
2
1
%
2
5
%
2
8
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
7
5
7
%
1
0
%
3
5
%
2
9
%
2
0
%
5
2
%
4
9
%
2
7
7
5
%
1
2
%
1
9
%
3
1
%
3
4
%
3
6
%
6
5
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
6
4
%
6
%
2
5
%
3
5
%
3
0
%
3
5
%
6
5
%
2
6
6
0
%
8
%
1
2
%
3
2
%
4
7
%
2
0
%
7
9
%
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
2
4
%
1
2
%
3
2
%
3
4
%
1
9
%
4
8
%
5
3
%
3
0
5
1
%
1
0
%
2
4
%
3
0
%
3
4
%
3
5
%
6
4
%
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
5
2
3
%
9
%
2
5
%
3
0
%
3
3
%
3
7
%
6
3
%
1
5
4
1
%
6
%
1
3
%
2
9
%
5
1
%
2
0
%
8
0
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

i
n

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
e
d
i
a
n
2
8
9
5
%
1
0
%
3
0
%
3
2
%
2
3
%
4
6
%
5
5
%
2
9
1
2
%
1
0
%
2
0
%
3
0
%
3
5
%
3
4
%
6
6
%
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
2
0
1
2
-
1
3

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
-
T
E
S
T

(
C
S
T
)

E
N
G
L
I
S
H

L
A
N
G
U
A
G
E

A
R
T
S

A
N
D

M
A
T
H

R
E
S
U
L
T
S

A
2
0
1
3

C
S
T

E
L
A
2
0
1
3

C
S
T

M
A
T
H
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
296
0123456789
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l

N
a
m
e
#

T
e
s
t
e
d
%

F
a
r

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
a
s
i
c
%

P
r
o
f
%

A
d
v
%

B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%

P
r
o
f

/
A
d
v
#

T
e
s
t
e
d
%

F
a
r

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
e
l
o
w

B
a
s
i
c
%

B
a
s
i
c
%

P
r
o
f
%

A
d
v
%

B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%

P
r
o
f

/
A
d
v
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
3
8
2
8
%
1
3
%
2
8
%
3
2
%
1
9
%
4
9
%
5
1
%
3
8
5
4
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
3
2
%
2
2
%
4
6
%
5
4
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
2
9
4
%
1
0
%
2
4
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
3
8
%
6
2
%
5
3
1
2
%
1
1
%
1
4
%
2
8
%
4
6
%
2
7
%
7
4
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
7
5
%
1
4
%
3
1
%
3
2
%
1
9
%
5
0
%
5
1
%
3
3
9
5
%
1
8
%
2
4
%
2
7
%
2
6
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
6
4
%
9
%
2
0
%
3
3
%
3
4
%
3
3
%
6
7
%
2
5
8
0
%
9
%
1
7
%
2
9
%
4
4
%
2
6
%
7
3
%
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
9
8
5
%
1
1
%
2
8
%
3
3
%
2
3
%
4
4
%
5
6
%
7
0
2
2
%
1
4
%
2
4
%
2
9
%
3
0
%
4
0
%
5
9
%
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
0
5
4
%
8
%
2
9
%
2
9
%
3
0
%
4
1
%
5
9
%
5
0
6
1
%
9
%
1
7
%
3
1
%
4
2
%
2
7
%
7
3
%
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
0
3
0
%
4
%
2
4
%
3
9
%
3
2
%
2
8
%
7
1
%
2
0
5
0
%
5
%
1
2
%
3
3
%
5
0
%
1
7
%
8
3
%
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
3
2
0
%
4
%
2
2
%
4
7
%
2
8
%
2
6
%
7
5
%
2
3
5
0
%
3
%
1
2
%
3
6
%
4
9
%
1
5
%
8
5
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
7
4
%
8
%
2
8
%
3
6
%
2
4
%
4
0
%
6
0
%
2
6
6
2
%
1
0
%
2
1
%
3
1
%
3
5
%
3
3
%
6
6
%
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
3
9
%
1
5
%
2
9
%
2
7
%
2
0
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
3
3
2
6
%
1
9
%
2
1
%
2
4
%
2
9
%
4
6
%
5
3
%
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
5
3
%
1
1
%
2
8
%
2
8
%
3
0
%
4
2
%
5
8
%
2
7
0
1
%
1
1
%
2
1
%
3
2
%
3
4
%
3
3
%
6
6
%
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
2
6
%
7
%
2
6
%
3
4
%
2
6
%
3
9
%
6
0
%
2
6
0
1
%
9
%
2
0
%
3
0
%
3
9
%
3
0
%
6
9
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
2
6
7
4
%
9
%
2
8
%
3
3
%
2
8
%
4
0
%
6
0
%
2
7
0
1
%
1
0
%
2
0
%
3
0
%
3
9
%
3
0
%
6
9
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
8
6
1
8
%
2
0
%
3
2
%
1
8
%
1
1
%
7
0
%
2
9
%
4
8
8
1
2
%
2
6
%
2
6
%
2
2
%
1
4
%
6
4
%
3
6
%
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
7
5
1
1
%
1
7
%
3
1
%
2
9
%
1
3
%
5
9
%
4
2
%
5
7
4
5
%
1
9
%
2
5
%
2
5
%
2
6
%
4
9
%
5
1
%
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
8
7
9
%
1
3
%
3
2
%
2
8
%
1
8
%
5
4
%
4
6
%
4
9
2
3
%
1
0
%
1
9
%
3
2
%
3
6
%
3
2
%
6
8
%
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
8
3
1
2
%
1
6
%
3
4
%
2
6
%
1
1
%
6
2
%
3
7
%
5
9
2
4
%
2
3
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
2
3
%
4
9
%
5
2
%
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
6
9
1
3
%
1
4
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
4
7
1
6
%
1
8
%
2
4
%
2
6
%
2
6
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
4
8
7
1
2
%
1
6
%
3
2
%
2
8
%
1
1
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
4
9
2
5
%
1
9
%
2
4
%
2
6
%
2
6
%
4
9
%
5
2
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
9
4
5
%
1
1
%
2
9
%
3
3
%
2
3
%
4
5
%
5
6
%
2
9
6
3
%
1
4
%
2
1
%
2
9
%
3
3
%
3
8
%
6
2
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
7
5
%
1
4
%
3
1
%
3
2
%
1
9
%
5
0
%
5
1
%
3
3
9
5
%
1
8
%
2
4
%
2
7
%
2
6
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
3
8
%
1
3
%
2
4
%
3
3
%
2
1
%
4
5
%
5
4
%
3
3
0
7
%
1
2
%
2
6
%
2
8
%
2
6
%
4
5
%
5
4
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
7
4
%
8
%
2
8
%
3
6
%
2
4
%
4
0
%
6
0
%
2
6
6
2
%
1
0
%
2
1
%
3
1
%
3
5
%
3
3
%
6
6
%
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
1
3
5
%
1
0
%
3
1
%
3
8
%
1
6
%
4
6
%
5
4
%
3
1
7
2
%
1
2
%
2
3
%
3
4
%
2
9
%
3
7
%
6
3
%
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
3
9
4
%
5
%
2
2
%
3
9
%
3
1
%
3
1
%
7
0
%
1
4
1
1
%
7
%
1
1
%
3
0
%
5
1
%
1
9
%
8
1
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

i
n

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
e
d
i
a
n
3
0
4
5
%
1
1
%
2
9
%
3
5
%
2
2
%
4
5
%
5
5
%
3
0
7
3
%
1
2
%
2
2
%
3
0
%
3
1
%
3
8
%
6
3
%
2
0
1
2

C
S
T

M
A
T
H
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
2
0
1
1
-
1
2

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
-
T
E
S
T

(
C
S
T
)

E
N
G
L
I
S
H

L
A
N
G
U
A
G
E

A
R
T
S

A
N
D

M
A
T
H

R
E
S
U
L
T
S

2
0
1
2

C
S
T

E
L
A
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
297
0123456789
a
a
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
u
s
p
.

R
a
t
e

2
0
1
1
-
1
2
S
u
s
p
.

R
a
t
e

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
S
i
n
g
l
e

S
t
d
.

%
2
0
1
1
-
1
2
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
2
0
1
1
-
1
2
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
%

A
f
r
.

A
m
e
r
.
#

A
f
r
.

A
m
e
r
.
S
u
s
p
.

R
a
t
e
S
i
n
g
l
e

S
t
d
.

%
%

S
t
u
d
.

D
i
s
.
#

S
t
u
d
.

D
i
s
.
S
u
s
p
.

R
a
t
e
S
i
n
g
l
e

S
t
d
.

%
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
1
%
0
%
0
%
4
2
7
2
2
2
%
1
4
1
1
%
1
%
7
%
4
4
2
%
2
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E
S
5
2
5
8
9
B
r
y
s
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
0
0
0
0
%
3
0
%
0
%
6
%
5
4
0
%
0
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
%
0
%
0
%
1
0
2
1
0
2
1
%
5
0
%
0
%
1
4
%
7
6
0
%
0
%
N
3
2
6
3
0
B
u
r
b
a
n
k

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
1
%
0
2
0
4
1
1
%
4
8
0
%
0
%
9
%
3
7
0
%
0
%
N
6
2
7
8
1
C
a
n
t
e
r
b
u
r
y

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
%
0
%
0
%
2
3
2
2
9
3
0
%
2
0
%
0
%
8
%
8
8
0
%
0
%
S
7
3
4
2
5
D
e
n
k
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
1
1
3
2
1
3
%
1
0
8
1
%
1
%
1
0
%
8
5
1
%
1
%
E
5
3
4
7
9
D
o
r
r
i
s

P
l
a
c
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
1
0
1
0
1
%
5
0
%
0
%
1
0
%
3
3
0
%
0
%
N
3
4
8
4
9
L
e
m
a
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
0
%
4
0
5
0
6
%
2
7
0
%
0
%
1
5
%
6
5
0
%
0
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
1
%
3
2
3
2
5
%
2
1
0
%
0
%
1
2
%
5
3
2
%
2
%
N
3
5
2
3
3
M
e
l
v
i
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
2
2
2
5
6
%
2
7
0
%
0
%
1
4
%
6
6
3
%
2
%
N
6
6
8
9
0
S
t
a
g
g

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
%
1
%
1
%
8
3
1
0
3
3
%
1
7
0
%
0
%
1
1
%
5
2
0
%
0
%
W
4
7
7
1
2
W
e
s
t
p
o
r
t

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
1
%
1
2
1
4
4
5
%
1
8
2
1
%
1
%
8
%
3
3
6
%
6
%
L
A
U
S
D

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

f
r
o
m

C
D
E

M
e
d
i
a
n
0
%
0
%
0
%
2
2
3
2
5
%
2
1
0
%
0
%
1
0
%
5
4
0
%
0
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
1
%
1
%
4
6
9
1
5
1
9
%
1
6
1
3
%
2
%
1
1
%
9
4
5
%
4
%
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
1
%
1
%
9
1
0
2
1
1
4
2
8
%
2
4
2
3
%
3
%
1
0
%
9
0
7
%
6
%
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
4
0
9
0
1
5
%
9
9
0
%
0
%
1
1
%
7
1
0
%
0
%
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
5
1
5
1
2
2
%
2
2
0
1
%
1
%
1
1
%
1
0
8
1
%
1
%
E
2
5
6
9
9
N
o
r
w
o
o
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
1
%
0
%
1
0
4
1
3
1
0
3
%
1
9
0
%
0
%
1
1
%
8
4
4
%
2
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

M
e
d
i
a
n
0
%
1
%
0
%
5
4
9
1
0
1
9
%
1
6
1
1
%
1
%
1
1
%
9
0
4
%
2
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
7
2
4
7
3
B
o
n
i
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
0
0
0
1
2
%
6
5
0
%
0
%
1
2
%
6
8
0
%
0
%
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
%
0
%
0
%
1
0
2
1
0
2
1
%
5
0
%
0
%
1
4
%
7
6
0
%
0
%
N
6
4
7
9
0
L
a
s
s
e
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
0
%
7
2
9
3
4
%
2
0
0
%
0
%
1
4
%
7
4
1
%
1
%
N
3
5
1
9
8
M
a
y
a
l
l

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
1
%
3
2
3
2
5
%
2
1
0
%
0
%
1
2
%
5
3
2
%
2
%
N
3
5
4
5
9
N
e
v
a
d
a

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
0
%
5
0
8
0
6
%
3
1
0
%
0
%
1
5
%
8
7
0
%
0
%
W
4
7
4
2
5
V
a
n

N
e
s
s

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
%
0
%
0
%
2
1
2
2
4
%
1
1
0
%
0
%
1
6
%
4
2
2
%
2
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

i
n

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
e
d
i
a
n
1
%
0
%
0
%
4
2
6
2
5
%
2
1
0
%
0
%
1
4
%
7
1
1
%
1
%
E
V
E
N
T
S
D
A
Y
S
A
F
R
I
C
A
N

A
M
E
R
I
C
A
N
S
S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S

W
I
T
H

D
I
S
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
S
U
S
P
E
N
S
I
O
N
S

W
I
T
H

C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N

S
C
H
O
O
L
S
T
h
i
s

p
a
g
e

d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s

t
h
e

s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n

e
v
e
n
t
s
,

d
a
y
s

a
n
d

r
a
t
e

f
o
r

2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
2

a
n
d

2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
3

s
c
h
o
o
l

y
e
a
r
.

C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N

D
A
T
A

(
A
L
L
)
D
I
S
P
R
O
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
298
0123456789
DR. THEODORE T. ALEXANDER SCIENCE CENTER
J UNE 10, 2014
The following documents:
Final petition
Lottery form
are available for perusal at the:
333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20th Floor
(213) 241-0399
The final petition may also be viewed at the following link:
http://www.laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions
299
0123456789
TAB 22
Approval of the Charter for Ednovate High School No. 2
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of the proposed charter for Ednovate High School No. 2 for five (5) years,
beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020, to serve 135 students in grade 9 in its first year of operation and up
to 500 students in grades 9-12 by the end of its charter term.
Background:
On April 17, 2014, Ednovate High School No. 2 submitted a charter petition application to the Charter Schools
Division, which included the number of signatures required under Education Code 47605(a). A Public
Hearing was held on May 13, 2014. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by the
Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District staff. The 60-day statutory
timeline for Board action on this petition continues until June 16, 2014.
Staff affirms that Ednovate High School No. 2 has met the requirements set forth in Education Code 47605,
based on review and consideration of its charter school petition application.
Ednovate High School No. 2 is proposed to be located in the 90033 ZIP code of the East Los Angeles/Boyle
Heights area. This area is served by Educational Service Center East in Board District 2. The school will serve
135 students in grade 9 in its first year and expand to serve 500 students in grades 9-12 by 2020. Ednovate
High School No. 2 has indicated that it intends to request facilities under Proposition 39.
The mission of Ednovate High School No. 2 is to ensure that students will use their college degrees and careers
to make a positive multigenerational change. The schools vision is to close the college graduation gap for first
generation and low-income families by giving students a multigenerational purpose for college and career;
significantly advancing academic proficiency through a personalized curriculum; and developing specific
mindsets that yield success through high school, college and a career in a global economy.
The following core beliefs are interwoven throughout the schools design: (1) Purpose: Ednovate High School
No. 2 believes that if students are driven by a deep sense of purpose to use their college degrees and their
careers, they will be more likely to persist through college graduation. The school intends for students to
graduate from high school seeing themselves as agents for Positive Multigenerational Change (PMC) in their
family, community, nation and world. (2) Personalization: Ednovate High School No. 2 believes it can
significantly advance the academic proficiency and depth of learning in students through a mastery-based
personalized college-prep curriculum. The schools blended learning model is intended to allow for more
efficient use of student and teacher time, creating space for the deep learning that happens with the PMC
performance tasks. (3) Mindsets: Believing in developing the mindsets needed to thrive in and persist through
college graduation, the schools student experiences (face-to-face and online) are designed to intentionally
develop traits of integrity, entrepreneurship, master and joy.
Ednovate High School No. 2 will implement its own English Learner Master Plan.
powered by Legistar
300
0123456789
Ednovate High School No. 2 will be the second Ednovate school, a charter management organization
established by the USC Rossier School of Education. USC Hybrid High School, the CMOs first site, was
originally granted its charter by the Board of Education on December 6, 2011, and opened on September 4,
2012. In 2013, USC Hybrid HS achieved a school-wide Base API of 688. Based on CST results, 37% of 9th
graders tested scored proficient in ELA and 21% scored proficient in Math. The school met 6 of 11 AYP
Criteria. Since USC Hybrid HS is in its second year of operation, it does not have a School Performance
Framework classification due to missing 4-year cohort graduation data and first time California High School
Exit Exam (CAHSEE) data. The school has not yet earned a 2012 Statewide Rank or Similar Schools Rank due
to their limited numbers of years in operation. The 2013 Academic Growth Over Time (AGT) report indicates
that students tested below their predicted growth in ELA, at predicted growth in General math, and far below
predicted growth in Algebra 1.
The school has shared internal data which indicate positive trends as the use of an innovative blended learning
model to monitor individual student progress, the implementation of pre- and quarterly data analysis with
individual student targets, and strategic plan analysis and data conferencing. For example, referencing their
internal benchmark MAP assessment, Spring 2013 to Spring 2014 Comparison of Percentage of Math,
Reading, and Language Cohort Meeting/Exceeding the National Average which reflect 16% growth in Math;
21% growth in Reading; and, 26% growth in Language when comparing Spring 2014 to Spring 2013 results.
Additionally the Percentage of Cohort students meeting the 2014 Growth Target has increased. The CSD will
continue to monitor the schools progress as it implements Common Core.
At the May 13, 2014 LAUSD Board of Education meeting, a material revision was approved to reflect changes
to the schools size, schedule, and instructional model; the governance structure; job descriptions and positions;
capacity; and revisions to the student discipline policy and procedures. The Governing Board and school
leadership responded to a need to enhance its student behavior and discipline policies and practices, which are
aligned to the Districts Positive School Climate and Discipline Foundation policies. From August through
October, the school suspended 56 students for 64 days, accounting for approximately 70% of the suspension
numbers for the year. Subsequently, however, the suspension rate has declined steadily: 25 students were
suspended for a total of 27 days in the ensuing six months. As the LAUSD Board of Education noted at its
May 13, 2014 meeting, the organization has reflected on its practices and made important improvements, which
the CSD will continue to monitor.
Ednovate High School No. 2 will make every effort to recruit a diverse student population in the target area of
East Los Angeles. For example, the demographics of Garfield High School, a District school within a two-mile
radius of the proposed charter school location, are 98% Latino, 1% African American, 1% White, 18% English
Learners, and 100% Free and Reduced Lunch (CDE). Ednovate High School No. 2 indicates in its petition that
the charter school will recruit students of various racial and ethnic groups in the East Los Angeles/Boyle
Heights area so as to achieve a balance that is reflective of the general population residing within the territorial
jurisdiction of LAUSD. The school will maintain an accurate accounting of the ethnic and racial balance of
students enrolled in the school. It will also keep on file documentation of the efforts the school makes to
achieve racial and ethnic balance. Outreach meetings will be held in several locations of the target area in order
to ensure all students in the area have an opportunity to attend the school. Recruitment materials will be
developed in English and Spanish in order to reach the limited English proficient populations that exist in the
area. Marketing will occur in a variety of community settings including community groups, agencies,
neighborhood youth organizations, social service providers, churches, grocery stores and public libraries that
serve the various racial, ethnic and interest groups represented in the district.
Current members of the Ednovate, Inc. Board of Directors completed questionnaires regarding conflicts of
powered by Legistar
301
0123456789
Current members of the Ednovate, Inc. Board of Directors completed questionnaires regarding conflicts of
interest. A due diligence review of the Ednovate High School No. 2 school executives, is being performed by
the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Staff will inform the Board of any material negative findings and
take appropriate action.
If approved, the Ednovate High School No. 2 charter will have a five-year term, beginning July 1, 2015 until
June 30, 2020. As part of its oversight responsibility, the Charter Schools Division will perform ongoing
oversight of the charter school throughout the term of the charter.
Expected Outcomes:
Ednovate High School No. 2 is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local, state,
and federal ordinances, laws and regulations, and the terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The
measurable pupil outcomes and method by which pupil progress toward outcomes will be measured as are set
forth in the petition.
Yes - The approval of the charter petition for Ednovate High School No. 2 would grant its Board of Directors
the right to operate the charter school under the terms of the approved charter for a five (5) year period,
beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020.
No - The denial of the charter petition would result in the Board of Directors for Ednovate High School No. 2
being prohibited from opening the charter school, unless Ednovate High School No. 2 appeals the denial and
the charter is granted by the Los Angeles County Board of Education or the California State Board of
Education. This Board Report 480 - 13/14 and accompanying documents shall constitute the Board of
Educations adopted written findings of fact for the denial of Ednovate High School No. 2s petition.
Budget Impact:
State income and various other income sources to the District are reduced when current District students enroll
at a charter school, and comparable or offsetting expenditure savings may not occur in such cases. Under
Education Code section 47604(c), a school district that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or
as, a nonprofit public benefit corporation is not held liable for the charter schools debts or obligations as long
as the school district complies with all oversight responsibilities. The District will continue to have monitoring
and oversight responsibility for charter school finances, as specified in the Charter Schools Act. Any
modifications to the charter schools petition or operations with significant financial implications would require
District approval prior to implementation. Petition approval is also contingent upon adequate liability insurance
coverage.
Ednovate High School No. 2 has selected LAUSD SELPA Option 2. Under the current LAUSD SELPA
Option 2 Special Education MOU, Charter Schools fair share contribution for special education for the first
year of the charter petition will be 20% of the Districts general fund contribution rate per ADA for that fiscal
year, which will be paid from the Charter Schools funds from the Local Control Funding Formula. The rate
will increase by 5% for each subsequent fiscal year until the applicable percentage reaches 35%. For the
remainder of the Charter Schools petition period, the rate will remain at 35% of the Districts general fund
powered by Legistar
302
0123456789
contribution rate for each fiscal year. At the conclusion of each fiscal year during the entire charter petition
period, any unspent special education revenues shall be returned to the LAUSD SELPA.
Prior to the Board approval of the charter petition, the school must have resolved any pending issues in the
review process and submitted any requested material including a signed Special Education Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU). Should Ednovate High School No. 2 not comply with this requirement, this Board item
will be withdrawn from the agenda.
Attachments:
Informative
powered by Legistar
303
0123456789
DESEGREGATION IMPACT STATEMENT (DIS)
EDNOV ATE HIGH SCHOOL NO.2
BOARD OF EDUCA nON REPORT 480 - 13/ 14
June 10,2014
The proposed action would initiate the charter for Ednovate High School No.2, beginning July 1, 2015
until June 30, 2020 to serve 135 students in grade 9 in year I and up to 500 students in grades 9-12 by the
end of its charter term.
Charter schools are schools of choice by legislation and are open to any student in the State of California.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted,
however, that although State legislation allows students to aHend a charter school from any area in the
state, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is under Court Order, Crawford v. LAUSD,
which applies to all schools within or chartered through the LAUSD. Any modifications to the Court-
Ordered Integration Program must first be approved by Student Integration Services.
Ill. Proposed Change:
The approval of this charter petition would grant the charter of Ednovate High School No.2 for five (5)
years beginning July 1,2015 until June 30, 2020.
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) does not guarantee avai lability of Court-ordered
Integration funding. The charter school will be responsible for maintaining the Court Order and
providing information requested by the LAUSD as set forth in the Charter petition. Modifications or
school decisions cannot negatively impact or cause additional costs to the Court-ordered Integrat ion
budget.
V. Analyze the Impact of This Proposal on Integrat ion. Desegregation, Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
If the Charter goals are met, there should be positive results on the five (5) Harms of Racial Isolation
wh ich are low academic achievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opportunities,
interracial hostility and intolerance, and overcrowded condit ions. The Court-ordered Integration Program
for participating students will operate under various Court Orders for schools within the Los Angeles
Unified School District. Any modification of the Court-ordered Integration Program must first be
approved by Student Integration Services.
VI. If proposed action affects negatively anv desegregation program. list other option(s) identified:
Ifthe District Court-ordered Int egration Guide lines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
District's Court-ordered Integration Program.
DANA EDLIS
Specialist
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 480 - 13114
MODESTAJ .
Interim Director
Student Integrati on Services
June 10, 2014
304
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
305
0123456789
No. 480 13/14
For June 10 Board Meeting
INFORMATIVE
FROM: J os Cole-Gutirrez, Director
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR PROPOSED EDNOVATE HIGH SCHOOL NO. 2
Attached please find supporting documentation for the proposed EdnovateHigh School No. 2which will be
presented to the Board of Education for action on J une 10, 2014.
Documentation includes:
1. Map showing all LAUSD schools and charter schools within a 2-mile radius of the proposed
charter school site;
2. Breakdown of enrollment and test score information for all LAUSD and charter schools serving
similar grade levels within a 2-mile radius of the proposed charter school site. Also included are
any other charter schools operated by the petitioner (if applicable).
Other LAUSD schools and charter schools within a 2-mile radius of the proposed charter school are:
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. 1
ST
ST.
2. 4
TH
ST.
3. AMANECER PC
4. ANTON
5. BELVEDERE
6. BREED ST.
7. BROOKLYN EEC
8. CENTRAL REGION EEC #2
9. CITY TERRACE
10. EASTMAN AVE.
11. EASTMAN EEC
12. EUCLID AVE.
13. EVERGREENAVE.
14. FORD BLVD.
15. HAMASAKI
16. HARRISON ST.
17. HUMPHREYS AVE.
18. KENNEDY
19. LANE
20. LORENA ST.
21. MALABAR ST.
22. MARIANNA AVE.
23. MURCHINSON ST.
24. ROWAN AVE.
1. EXTERA PUBLIC SCHOOL
2. EXTERA PUBLIC SCHOOL 2
3. KIPP ILUMINAR
4. KIPP RAICES
306
0123456789
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent - 2- J une 10, 2014
25. SHERIDAN ST.
26. SUNRISE
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. BELVEDERE
2. GRIFFITH
3. HOLLENBECK
4. STEVENSON
1. KIPP LA COLLEGE PREP
2. KIPP SOL ACADEMY
HIGH SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. BRAVO MED MAG HIGH
2. GARFIELD
3. MONTEREY CONT HIGH
4. ROOSEVELT
5. ROOSEVELT HIGH CMNT
6. ROOSEVELT MAGNET HIGH
7. SOLIS LEARNING ACADEMY
8. TORRES ELA PERF ARTS
9. TORRES ENG & TECH
10. TORRES HUM/ART/TECH
11. TORRES RENAISSANCE
12. TORRES SOCIAL J USTICE & LEADERSHIP
13. WILSON
1. ALLIANCE STERN MATH & SCI
2. DE LA HOYA ANIMO HIGH
3. MEDIA ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT HS
(ALMA AVE)
4. MEDIA ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT HS
(WHITTIER BLVD)
SPAN SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. BROOKLYN AVE
2. PEREZ SPECIAL ED CTR
ADULT SCHOOLS
1. EAST LA STAR ADULT ED
2. EAST LOS ANGELES OCCUP CTR
3. RAMONA HIGH (OPP)
4. GARFIELD ADULT ED
LAUSD Schools Under Construction
None
Other Charter Schools Operated by Petitioner
USC Hybrid High School
Should you have questions or comments, please call me at (213) 241-0399 or e-mail me at jose.cole-
gutierrez@lausd.net.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
307
0123456789
CHARTER SCHOOLS DIVISION
BRIEFINGPAGE
EDNOVATE HIGH SCHOOL NO. 2
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
J UNE 10, 2014
The Charter Schools Division recommends Board of Education approval of Ednovate High School No. 2
based onthe findings from the Divisions rigorous and comprehensive charter review process for elements
1-16. These elements were reviewed by the Superintendents Advisory Committee and the Office of the
General Counsel.
Based on the criteria set forth in Education Code 47605 for charter school authorization, and upon
completion of the Charter Schools Divisions process, including review of all elements (1-16), the final
decision will be determined on the following:
The charter presents a sound educational program.
The petitioners are likely to successfully implement the program.
The petition does contain the number of signatures required.
The petition does contain the required affirmations.
The petition does contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of the 16 elements.
The following list provides a brief overview about the charter petition and its petitioner.
Lead Petitioner Applying for Charter: Oliver Sicat
Grades Served: 9-12
Projected Start Date: J uly 1, 2015
Instructional Focus: Ednovate High School No. 2sinstructional focus is on college and career
preparation via hybrid or blended learning and personalized, project-based learning. The schools
hybrid/blended model includes both digital and offline curricula aligned to Common Core State
Standards. Much of the core instruction is delivered through studio lessons where students work
independently on self-guided lessons created and curated by their teachers. Lessons are
differentiated to challenge students performing at all levels.
Number of Students: Ednovate High School No. 2expects to enroll 1359
th
gradestudents in the
first year. When fully enrolled, it estimates servingapproximately 500 students in grades 9-12.
Location Address or Target Neighborhood: East Los Angelesand Boyle Heights ZIP code
90033.
Facility Status/Location: Facility to be determined. Petitioners intend to apply for Prop. 39.
LAUSD Planned Facilities in the Area: None.
Board Policy Considerations (Low API, Overcrowded areas): See table below.
308
0123456789
ESC BD
Loc.
Code School
Grade
Span
2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
E 2 4945 Lorena Street Elementary K- 5 455 Year 5 No No 731 735 2 2 44 16 14 32 30 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 3096 City Terrace Elementary K- 5 280 Year 4 Yes No 824 800 5 8 46 14 13 19 27 87 0 2 10 0 0 0 0
E 2 6685 Sheridan Street Elementary K- 6 752 Year 5 No No 730 758 3 5 58 14 10 36 33 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 4696 Robert F. Kennedy Elementary K- 6 319 Year 4 No No 717 742 2 3 51 15 9 35 28 99 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
E 5 4767 Robert Hill Lane Elementary K- 6 257 Year 2 Yes Yes 836 813 5 4 32 13 12 9 13 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
E 2 6425 Rowan Avenue Elementary K- 5 716 Year 1 No No 795 799 5 8 88 12 12 26 36 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 5082 Malabar Street Elementary K- 6 537 Year 5 No No 752 763 3 6 48 15 9 33 29 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 5438 Murchison Street Elementary K- 6 370 Year 5 No No 728 732 2 4 63 16 11 25 29 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 3671 Euclid Avenue Elementary K- 5 649 Year 5 No No 698 728 2 1 53 11 11 34 27 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
E 2 4438 Harrison Street Elementary K- 6 394 Year 5 No No 695 705 1 1 57 6 12 40 28 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
E 2 4356 William R. Anton Elementary K- 6 645 Year 5 No No 746 763 3 4 47 11 7 31 30 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 6988 Sunrise Elementary K- 6 319 Year 5 No No 708 712 1 3 55 20 12 39 34 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 3918 Ford Boulevard Elementary K- 6 860 Year 5 No No 778 791 4 8 54 13 7 36 32 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 4616 Humphreys Avenue Elementary K- 5 602 Year 5 No No 752 762 3 3 62 11 8 40 19 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 5137 Marianna Avenue Elementary K- 6 291 Year 5 No No 792 795 4 7 50 9 11 29 33 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 2397 Belvedere Elementary K- 5 621 Year 5 No No 713 732 2 4 48 11 4 35 35 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 3521 Eastman Avenue Elementary K- 5 719 Year 5 No No 743 742 2 2 50 12 12 41 26 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 3836 First Street Elementary K- 6 578 Year 5 No No 744 755 2 4 57 11 12 32 40 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 2493 Breed Street Elementary K- 6 326 Year 5 No No 738 752 2 5 57 9 8 41 28 98 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
E 2 6274 Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary K- 6 321 Year 5 No No 755 795 4 10 57 25 6 26 20 95 2 1 1 0 1 0 0
E 2 3699 Evergreen Avenue Elementary K- 6 589 Year 5 No No 750 758 3 6 54 12 8 30 42 98 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
E 2 3973 Fourth Street Elementary K- 5 707 Year 2 No No 782 811 5 8 51 11 11 32 24 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 6426 Amanecer Primary Center K- 2 78 No No 782 846 7 58 17 0 54 19 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8618 Woodrow Wilson Senior High 9-12 1385 Year 5 No No 653 648 1 2 67 15 11 16 42 94 1 2 4 1 0 0 0
E 2 8679 James A. Garfield Senior High 9-12 1781 Year 5 No Yes 714 710 3 4 62 10 12 18 55 98 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8606 East Los Angeles PerformingArts Academy 9-12 373 Year 1 Yes Yes 642 620 1 1 57 9 12 18 44 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7752 Hilda L. Solis LearningAcademy School o 9-10 127 604 B N/A N/A 81 19 3 31 38 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7772 East Los Angeles Renaissance Academy at 9-12 345 Year 2 Yes No 653 644 1 3 63 13 6 21 45 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7773 Engineering and Technology Academy at Es 9-12 383 Year 2 No No 641 637 1 2 57 13 10 22 53 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7775 Humanitas Academy of Art and Technology 9-12 346 Year 2 No No 577 594 1 1 60 12 9 27 41 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7777 Social Justice Leadership Academy at Est 9-12 361 Year 2 Yes No 593 578 1 1 60 12 5 24 40 98 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
XP 2 7749 School of Communications, New Media and 9-12 275 Year 5 Yes Yes 601 544 1 1 67 13 7 27 56 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XS 2 8677 Monterey Continuation 9-12 56 No Yes 577 650 B B 50 0 2 36 30 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
XP 2 7751 Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Acade 9-12 263 Yes Yes 803 732 4 1 86 3 32 6 64 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8754 Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet High 9-12 1396 Year 1 Yes Yes 847 842 9 9 60 2 42 2 62 80 7 2 9 3 0 0 0
E 2 8047 Belvedere Middle 6- 8 1365 Year 5 Yes Yes 733 717 2 4 68 13 14 20 48 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8168 David Wark Griffith Middle 6- 8 1371 Year 5 No No 724 735 3 5 81 13 16 15 45 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8179 Hollenbeck Middle 6- 8 1327 Year 5 Yes No 685 673 1 1 72 14 11 18 49 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8387 Robert Louis Stevenson Middle 6- 8 1846 Year 2 Yes Yes 696 679 1 1 63 11 13 22 52 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XS 2 8807 Ramona Opportunity High 7-12 88 No No 456 548 B B 66 9 0 38 32 98 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
E 2 1953 Alphonso B. Perez Special Education Cent PK-12 182 857 816 C C 19 ## 0 65 2 84 2 2 4 4 0 0 4
E 2 2562 Brooklyn Avenue Elementary K- 8 470 Year 5 Yes Yes 831 814 5 9 81 18 15 23 33 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2272 Extera Public School #2 K- 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2 2043 KIPP Raices Academy K- 3 294 Yes Yes 970 961 10 10 95 10 0 44 19 97 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5 8214 Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment De 9-11 218 Year 1 Yes No 694 684 2 2 93 7 0 19 56 97 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
XR 5 8457 KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory 5- 8 461 Yes Yes 918 925 10 10 93 6 6 13 43 97 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
XR 2 8827 Animo Oscar De La Hoya Charter High 9-12 471 Year 1 No No 738 744 5 8 96 6 0 16 67 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5 8826 Alliance Marc & Eva Stern Math and Scien 9-12 474 Year 1 No No 776 785 7 10 88 8 0 10 46 97 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
XR 2 2256 Extera Public K- 3 186 Yes Yes 802 745 2 90 10 0 55 16 98 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Please note: School Demographic percentages may not sum to 100 due to responses of: other, multiple, or non-response.
309
0123456789
Background/Context about the Petitioner: Ednovate, Inc., the charter management organization
established by the USC Rossier School of Education, will oversee Ednovate High School No. 2
and currently oversees USC Hybrid High School (USC Hybrid). In the last year, USC Hybrid
underwent changes in Board membership and in instructional and operational staff, including the
addition of new Board members and the hiring of CEO/Executive Director Oliver Sicat from
Chicago Public Schools.
Board of Directors:
Karen Symms Gallagher
Dr. Noemi Donoso
Dr. Maria Ott
David Rattray
Elliot Sainer
Description of Mission: The mission of Ednovate High School No. 2 is to ensure that students
will use their college degrees and careers to make a positive multigenerational change.
Description of Vision: Ednovate High School No. 2s vision is to close the college graduation gap
for first generation and low-income families by giving students a multigenerational purpose for
college and career, significantly advancing academic proficiency through a personalized
curriculum, and developing specific mindsets that yield success. The school aims to combine a
traditional no excuses model with a blended learning model that embeds technology across the
curriculum. The goal is to develop self-motivated, disciplined learners who are prepared to
graduate from top four-year universities and who will use their college degrees and careers to
effect positive multigenerational change.
Source of Core Money: Ednovate High School No. 2 will receive funding from state and federal
governments and from the Broad Foundation.
3-5 Top Leaders: Oliver Sicat, J essica Cohn, Reid Phillips, Karen Symms Gallagher.
Other charter schools currently operated by the Petitioner: USC Hybrid High School.
Other charter petitions pending before LAUSD: None.
Submission of this charter application to other jurisdiction(s) for approval: Not applicable.
Innovative elements of the charter that could be considered best practices and replicated
by other schools: Ednovate High School No. 2 will use a highly personalized model of blended
learning to increase the academic proficiency and depth of learning in our students, increasing the
number of students who graduate from college. Other promising practices include the schools
focus on developing the mindsets needed to thrive and persist in college, as well as a focus on
creating positive multigenerational change.
310
0123456789
2012 BASE API AND 2013 GROWTH API DEMOGRAPHICS
SCHOOLS WITHIN A 2-MILE RADIUS
Ednovate High School No. 2
312 N. Record Ave., Los Angeles CA 9063
Grades 9-12
ESC BD
Loc.
Code School
Grade
Span
2013
Growth API
Testing
Enrollment
2013-14 PI
Status
Met 2013 Sch-
wide Growth
Target
Met 2013
Subgroup Growth
Targets
2013
Growth API
2012
Base API
2012 Base
API State
Rank
2012 Base API
Similar Schools
Rank
% F/R
Lunch
% Sp
Ed % GATE % EL
%
RFEP
%
Latino % White % Af Amer % Asian % Filipino
% Am
Indian
% Pacific
Island
% Two or
More
E 2 4945 Lorena Street Elementary K- 5 455 Year 5 No No 731 735 2 2 44 16 14 32 30 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 3096 City Terrace Elementary K- 5 280 Year 4 Yes No 824 800 5 8 46 14 13 19 27 87 0 2 10 0 0 0 0
E 2 6685 Sheridan Street Elementary K- 6 752 Year 5 No No 730 758 3 5 58 14 10 36 33 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 4696 Robert F. Kennedy Elementary K- 6 319 Year 4 No No 717 742 2 3 51 15 9 35 28 99 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
E 5 4767 Robert Hill Lane Elementary K- 6 257 Year 2 Yes Yes 836 813 5 4 32 13 12 9 13 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
E 2 6425 Rowan Avenue Elementary K- 5 716 Year 1 No No 795 799 5 8 88 12 12 26 36 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 5082 Malabar Street Elementary K- 6 537 Year 5 No No 752 763 3 6 48 15 9 33 29 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 5438 Murchison Street Elementary K- 6 370 Year 5 No No 728 732 2 4 63 16 11 25 29 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 3671 Euclid Avenue Elementary K- 5 649 Year 5 No No 698 728 2 1 53 11 11 34 27 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
E 2 4438 Harrison Street Elementary K- 6 394 Year 5 No No 695 705 1 1 57 6 12 40 28 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
E 2 4356 William R. Anton Elementary K- 6 645 Year 5 No No 746 763 3 4 47 11 7 31 30 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 6988 Sunrise Elementary K- 6 319 Year 5 No No 708 712 1 3 55 20 12 39 34 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 5 3918 Ford Boulevard Elementary K- 6 860 Year 5 No No 778 791 4 8 54 13 7 36 32 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 4616 Humphreys Avenue Elementary K- 5 602 Year 5 No No 752 762 3 3 62 11 8 40 19 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 5137 Marianna Avenue Elementary K- 6 291 Year 5 No No 792 795 4 7 50 9 11 29 33 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 2397 Belvedere Elementary K- 5 621 Year 5 No No 713 732 2 4 48 11 4 35 35 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 3521 Eastman Avenue Elementary K- 5 719 Year 5 No No 743 742 2 2 50 12 12 41 26 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 3836 First Street Elementary K- 6 578 Year 5 No No 744 755 2 4 57 11 12 32 40 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 2493 Breed Street Elementary K- 6 326 Year 5 No No 738 752 2 5 57 9 8 41 28 98 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
E 2 6274 Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary K- 6 321 Year 5 No No 755 795 4 10 57 25 6 26 20 95 2 1 1 0 1 0 0
E 2 3699 Evergreen Avenue Elementary K- 6 589 Year 5 No No 750 758 3 6 54 12 8 30 42 98 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
E 2 3973 Fourth Street Elementary K- 5 707 Year 2 No No 782 811 5 8 51 11 11 32 24 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 6426 Amanecer Primary Center K- 2 78 No No 782 846 7 58 17 0 54 19 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8618 Woodrow Wilson Senior High 9-12 1385 Year 5 No No 653 648 1 2 67 15 11 16 42 94 1 2 4 1 0 0 0
E 2 8679 James A. Garfield Senior High 9-12 1781 Year 5 No Yes 714 710 3 4 62 10 12 18 55 98 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8606 East Los Angeles Performing Arts Academy 9-12 373 Year 1 Yes Yes 642 620 1 1 57 9 12 18 44 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7752 Hilda L. Solis Learning Academy School o 9-10 127 604 B N/A N/A 81 19 3 31 38 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7772 East Los Angeles Renaissance Academy at 9-12 345 Year 2 Yes No 653 644 1 3 63 13 6 21 45 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7773 Engineering and Technology Academy at Es 9-12 383 Year 2 No No 641 637 1 2 57 13 10 22 53 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7775 Humanitas Academy of Art and Technology 9-12 346 Year 2 No No 577 594 1 1 60 12 9 27 41 99 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 7777 Social Justice Leadership Academy at Est 9-12 361 Year 2 Yes No 593 578 1 1 60 12 5 24 40 98 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
XP 2 7749 School of Communications, New Media and 9-12 275 Year 5 Yes Yes 601 544 1 1 67 13 7 27 56 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XS 2 8677 Monterey Continuation 9-12 56 No Yes 577 650 B B 50 0 2 36 30 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
XP 2 7751 Math, Science, & Technology Magnet Acade 9-12 263 Yes Yes 803 732 4 1 86 3 32 6 64 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8754 Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet High 9-12 1396 Year 1 Yes Yes 847 842 9 9 60 2 42 2 62 80 7 2 9 3 0 0 0
E 2 8047 Belvedere Middle 6- 8 1365 Year 5 Yes Yes 733 717 2 4 68 13 14 20 48 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8168 David Wark Griffith Middle 6- 8 1371 Year 5 No No 724 735 3 5 81 13 16 15 45 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8179 Hollenbeck Middle 6- 8 1327 Year 5 Yes No 685 673 1 1 72 14 11 18 49 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 2 8387 Robert Louis Stevenson Middle 6- 8 1846 Year 2 Yes Yes 696 679 1 1 63 11 13 22 52 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XS 2 8807 Ramona Opportunity High 7-12 88 No No 456 548 B B 66 9 0 38 32 98 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
E 2 1953 Alphonso B. Perez Special Education Cent PK-12 182 857 816 C C 19 100 0 65 2 84 2 2 4 4 0 0 4
E 2 2562 Brooklyn Avenue Elementary K- 8 470 Year 5 Yes Yes 831 814 5 9 81 18 15 23 33 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2272 Extera Public School #2 K- 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2 2043 KIPP Raices Academy K- 3 294 Yes Yes 970 961 10 10 95 10 0 44 19 97 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5 8214 Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment De 9-11 218 Year 1 Yes No 694 684 2 2 93 7 0 19 56 97 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
XR 5 8457 KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory 5- 8 461 Yes Yes 918 925 10 10 93 6 6 13 43 97 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
XR 2 8827 Animo Oscar De La Hoya Charter High 9-12 471 Year 1 No No 738 744 5 8 96 6 0 16 67 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5 8826 Alliance Marc & Eva Stern Math and Scien 9-12 474 Year 1 No No 776 785 7 10 88 8 0 10 46 97 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
XR 2 2256 Extera Public K- 3 186 Yes Yes 802 745 2 90 10 0 55 16 98 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Span:
Address:
School:
School Demographic Characteristics
* = The school was not opened in 2011-12 or 2012-13.
# = The school did not have a valid 2012 Base API or ranks.
5/19/2014
1 of 2
311
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

O
P
E
R
A
T
E
D

B
Y

T
H
E

S
A
M
E

P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
O
t
h
e
r

E
d
n
o
v
a
t
e

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
X
R
2
7
6
7
2
U
S
C

H
y
b
r
i
d

H
i
g
h
9
-

9
1
2
5

6
8
8
B
N
/
A
N
/
A
7
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
2
6
6
4
2
5
2
1
0
0
3
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
is

n
e
w

o
r

a

p
r
im
a
r
y

c
e
n
t
e
r
.
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
2

o
f

2
312
0123456789
k
G
G
G
G
G
$
^
G
^
#
G
G
G
G
####
#
#
G
#
G
G
G
GF
Roosevelt
Mag High
Endeavor
College Prep
Extera
Public
School 2
KIPP
Raices
KIPP
Iluminar
Acad
East ESC
Adm Off
Garfield
Adult Ed
Media Arts &
Entertainment HS
Riley High
(Eastside)
Solis
Lrng
Acad
KIPP LA
College Prep
De La Hoya
Animo High
KIPP Sol
Acad
Extera
Public
School Torres Renaissance
Torres Eng
& Tech
Torres Hum/Art/Tech
Torres Social
Justice & Leadership
Roosevelt
High CMNT
Roosevelt
High ESP
Stern Math
& Sci
Monterey
Cont High
Extera
Public
School
Media Arts &
Entertainment HS
Torres ELA Perf
Arts Acad
East LA
Star Adult
Educ
SAN BE
RN
A
R
D
IN
O
F
R
W
Y
PO
M
O
N
A
F
R
W
Y
D
A
L
Y

S
T
SANTA ANA FRWY
E
7
T
H
S
T
BANDINI BLVD
VALLEY BLVD
E
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
B
L
V
D
E 3RD ST
W
RIGGIN ST
AVD CESA
R
C
H
A
V
E
Z
E WASHINGTON BLVD
G
O
L
D
E
N
S
T
A
T
E
F
R
W
Y
S

E
A
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
S
A
T
L
A
N
T
I
C

B
L
V
D
N
E
A
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
N
M
A
R
I
A
N
N
A
A
V
E OLYMPIC BLVD
CESAR E CHAVEZ AV
S
F
R
E
M
O
N
T
A
V
W
HITTIER BLVD
N
M
IS
S
IO
N
R
D
POMONA BLVD
S

S
O
T
O

S
T
S
L
O
R
E
N
A
S
T
E
C
E
S
A
R
E
C
H
A
V
E
Z
A
V
E
1
S
T
ST
E
4
T
H
S
T
N MAIN ST
N

S
O
T
O

S
T
M
A
R
E
N
G
O
S
T
L
O
N
G
B
E
A
C
H
F
R
W
Y
L
O
N
G

B
E
A
C
H

F
R
W
Y
LOS
ANGELES
ALHAMBRA
MONTEREY
PARK
MONTEBELLO
CITY OF
COMMERCE
VERNON
Newman
Nutrition
Center
Soto St
Adm Off
Lorena
St
Garza
PC
City Terrace
2nd
St
Sheridan
St
Wilson
High
Belvedere
Middle
Kennedy
Lane
Rowan
Ave
Malabar
St
Murchison
St
Euclid
Ave
Harrison
St
Dena
Anton
Bravo Med
Mag High
Sunrise
Garfield
High
Griffith
Middle
Hollenbeck
Middle
Stevenson
Middle
Griffin
Ave
Ford
Blvd
Humphreys
Ave
Marianna
Ave
Roosevelt
High
East Los
Angeles
Occup Ctr
Bridge
St
Multnomah
St
Perez
Spec
Ed Ctr
Belvedere
Soto
EEC
Eastman
Ave
Soto
St
Brooklyn
EEC
Eastman
EEC
1st St
Breed
St
Hamasaki
Evergreen
Ave
Brooklyn
Ave
4th
St
Ramona
High (Opp)
CR EEC
#2
Amanecer
PC
L.A.U.S.D. FACILITIES WITHIN A TWO MILE RADIUS OF
LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

Prepared by Master Planning and Demographics
Copyright 2013. All Rights Reserved.
The information contained herein is the proprietary property of
the following owners supplied under license and may not be
reproduced except as licensed by LAUSD, Digital Map Products, and
Thomas Bros. Maps.
MPD-2717
5/1/2014
LAUSD Boundaries
Area Outside of LAUSD
LAUSD Boundary
East Educational Service Center Area EAST
Area of Interest
(Located in Board of Education District #2) GF
2 mi. Radius of
Ednovate
High School
No. 2
EAST
SOUTH
Charter School G
# Elementary School
" Middle School
# High School
!(
Planned Early
Education Center
Planned Classroom
Addition _
Planned Playground
Expansion
[
^_
Planned School
Reconfiguration
#0
Planned Continuation
School
Administrative Office $
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Span School
Planned School
(Color Indicates Grade Level)
Closed School
Special Education School
Administrative Site
Opportunity School or Non K-12 School
Charter School
(Fill Color Indicates Grade Level)
Magnet School
313
0123456789
J UNE 10, 2014
Final budget
Final petition
Enrollment and lottery form
(213) 241-0399
314
0123456789
TAB 23
Approval of the Conversion Petition of Ralph Waldo Emerson Middle School to be an Affiliated Charter
School
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of the conversion petition of Ralph Waldo Emerson Middle School to an
affiliated charter school for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2014 until June 30, 2019, to serve 600 students in
grades 6-8 in year 1 and up to 850 students in grades 6-8 by the end of its charter term. The school will operate
under the new name, Emerson Community Charter School.
Background:
On January 16, 2014, Emerson Middle School submitted a completed charter petition application to the Charter
Schools Division (CSD) that included the number of signatures required under the Education Code section
47605 (a)(2). On April 25, 2014, the petitioners submitted the charter with the CSD required Educational
Service Center Certification form. A Public Hearing was held on May 13, 2014. The petition is to establish an
affiliated, conversion charter school. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by the
Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District staff.
Staff affirms that Emerson Middle School met the requirements as set forth in the Education Code 47605,
based on the review and consideration of its charter school petition.
The school is located at 1650 Selby Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 in Westwood. This area is currently
served by Educational Service Center West (ESCW), which is fully supportive of its petition to become an
affiliate charter school, and in Board District 4.
The school will serve 600 students in grades 6-8 in year 1 and expand to serve 850 students in grades 6-8 by
2019. Emerson Middle School currently serves 592 students in grades 6-8 with the following demographic
breakdown: 55% Latino; 19% White; 18% African American; 5% Asian; and 2% Filipino.
As a proposed conversion affiliated school, Emerson Middle School submitted signatures of at least 50% of the
permanent teachers per state law. Eleven (11) signatures were required and a total of seventeen (17) were
submitted. This represents 77.3% of Emerson Middle Schools permanent teachers. The administrative staff of
the ESC-West has indicated full support of this petition.
Emerson Middle School has a current API of 728, and 43.6% of its students scored proficient/advanced in
English Language Arts and 32.7% scored proficient/advanced in Mathematics. The school went from a
Service and Support rating on the School Performance Framework in 2012-13 to a Focus rating in 2013-
14, with the largest drops seen in Algebra I data. According to the school, in previous years, some eligible
students were placed in Algebra Readiness instead of Algebra I. In 2012-13, students were appropriately
placed, resulting in a correction year in Algebra I scores, which is reflected in the 2013-14 SPF and AGT
scores. However, as part of its improvement plan, the school is working to:
powered by Legistar
315
0123456789
1. Increase attendance rates as outlined in the Emerson attendance plan.
2. More accurately place students in math to stabilize and increase test scores and student opportunity.
3. Increase teacher performance through observation, professional development and vertical teaming.
4. Continue to lower the suspension rate and maintain it below 2%, in keeping with the significant
reduction over the past two years.
5. Focus on Common Core strategies that increase EL access to core curriculum. This includes a focus on
writing across the content, academic language, and active reading as defined in the charter petition.
6. Build stronger parent engagement through charter academies.
7. Continue to develop and adhere to Common Core Waiver Plan as developed jointly with Marina Del
Rey MS and Audubon MS.
8. Replace leaving teachers with highly competent and motivated teachers that buy into the charter model
and philosophy.
Moreover, the school will be receiving additional supports from the Intensive Support and Innovation Center
beginning in the fall.
As District employees, the administrators, site governing council, and all employees will comply with District
policies regarding ethics and conflicts of interest. The school will follow the Districts EL Master Plan.
Emerson Middle School will follow all District policies and procedures related to Special Education.
As part of the LAUSDs fiduciary responsibility, the Charter Schools Division will perform ongoing oversight
of the provisions of the charter.
Expected Outcomes:
Emerson Community Charter School is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local,
state, and federal ordinances, laws, and regulations, District policy regarding affiliated charter schools, and
terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The benchmarks for achievement are set forth in the petition.
Yes - The approval of the charter petition for Emerson Community Charter School would establish an
affiliated charter school under the authority of the LAUSD Board of Education under the terms of the approved
petition for a five (5) year period, beginning July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019.
No - The denial of the charter petition would result in the school site remaining as a traditional school of the
District.
Budget Impact:
The petition is to establish an affiliated charter school. As an affiliated charter school, revenues will be received
by LAUSD on their behalf. Thus, the school becomes a locally-funded charter school. The District will
allocate school resources in the same manner as it does for non-charter schools except as otherwise specified in
statute and in the District Affiliated Policy Bulletin 5439.0.
powered by Legistar
316
0123456789
All pending issues shall be resolved at the time of the Board meeting.
Attachments:
Informative
powered by Legistar
317
0123456789
DESEGREGA nON IMPACT STATEMENT (DIS)
EMERSON COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 481 -13114
June 10,2014
The proposed action would initiate the conversion to affiliated charter for Emerson Middle School beginning
July I, 2014 until June 30, 2019 to provide a total of 600 students in grades 6-8 for the first year and increase
total program capacity in grades 6-8 of up to 850 students through year 5.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted, however,
that although State legislation allows students to al1end a charter school from any area in the state, the Los
The approval of this charter petition would grant the charter for Emerson Community Charter School for five
(5) years, beginning July 1, 2014 until June 30, 2019.
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) does not guarantee availability of Court-ordered
V. Analvze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation. Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
low academic achievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opporhmities, interracial
VI. If proposed action affects negatively anv desegregation program, list other option(s) identified:
If the District Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there wil l not be a negative effect on the
PREPARED BY:
AIDA TATIOSSIAN
Specialist
Bd. of Ed RptNo. 481 - 13114

APPROVED BY:

MODESTA J. BASSITY r
Interim Director
Page 1 of 1 Board of Education
June 10, 2014
318
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
319
0123456789
No. 481 13/14
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR PROPOSED EMERSON COMMUNITY
CHARTER SCHOOL
Attached please find supporting documentation for the proposed Emerson CommunityCharter School
which will be presented to the Board of Education for action on J une 10, 2014.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. Brockton Ave
2. Clover Ave
3. Fairburn Ave
4. Overland Av
5. Richland Ave
6. Sterry
7. Warner Ave
1. Westwood Elementary
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. Webster Middle NONE
HIGH SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. University High NONE
SPAN SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
NONE 1. Magnolia Science Academy #4
ADULT SCHOOLS
NONE
320
0123456789
None
None
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
321
0123456789
CHARTER SCHOOL BRIEFING
J UNE 10, 2014
The Charter Schools Division recommends Board of Education approval of Emerson Community Charter
School based on the findings from the Divisions rigorous and comprehensive charter review process for
elements 1-16. These elements were reviewed by the Superintendents Advisory Committee and the Office
of the General Counsel.
Based on the criteria set forth in Education Code section47605 for charter school authorization, and upon
Lead Petitioner Applying for Charter: Dimone Watson, Principal
Grades Served: 6-8
Instructional Focus: Emerson will use research based effective teaching methodologies and
instructional strategies in order to ensure students are successful learners to meet students
needs and to close the achievement gap: Common Core focus strategies, Marzanos strategies,
Blooms Taxonomy, Constructivism, Project-Based Learning, Differentiation, SDAIE, and
scaffolding will be utilized within the instructional program. The schools vision is to foster
and promote students talents and 21
st
century skills through Academies. The academies will
use project-based learning to develop the whole child while also deepening students
conceptual knowledge of core subjects. The Academy projects will allow students to actively
collaborate and become critical thinking problem solvers. The academies include: The Science
and Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Academy; The Arts and Media
Academy (A&M); and the Emerson Sports Academy (ESA).
Number of Students: The first year the school will serve 600students in grades 6-8. The school will
serve up to 850students grades 6-8.
Location Address/Target Neighborhood: 1650 Selby Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024,
Educational Service Center West and Board District 4.
Facility Status/Location: 1650 Selby Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024
322
0123456789
ESC BD
Loc.
Code School G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W 4 3726 Fairburn Avenue Elementary K- 5 273 Yes Yes 940 976 10 10 9 8 30 4 6 4 69 4 19 0 1 1 1
W 1 3123 Clover Avenue Elementary K- 5 379 Yes Yes 952 957 10 9 21 8 22 11 12 18 26 10 41 2 2 1 1
W 1 5904 Overland Avenue Elementary K- 5 299 Yes Yes 946 958 10 8 8 9 30 0 3 7 63 5 21 3 0 0 0
W 4 6260 Richland Avenue Elementary K- 6 128 Year 2 No No 785 785 4 3 58 16 7 23 14 73 9 12 5 0 0 0 2
W 4 6932 Nora Sterry Elementary K- 5 216 Year 1 Yes No 814 801 5 6 76 22 8 29 17 70 11 14 3 0 1 0 0
W 4 7616 Warner Avenue Elementary K- 5 403 Yes Yes 961 958 10 9 4 10 21 2 2 4 79 1 13 1 0 0 1
W 4 2548 Brockton Avenue Elementary K- 5 174 Year 2 No No 778 795 4 6 80 24 9 35 23 78 9 7 4 2 0 0 0
W 4 8886 University Senior High 9-12 1336 Year 5 No No 747 750 5 8 74 11 20 9 37 58 9 22 8 2 1 0 0
W 4 8123 Ralph Waldo Emerson Middle 6- 8 661 Year 5 No No 728 765 4 1 50 11 20 11 26 55 19 18 5 2 1 0 1
W 4 8481 Daniel Webster Middle 6- 8 643 Year 5 No No 713 726 2 4 72 25 9 15 26 63 9 24 1 1 1 1 0
XR 4 8011 Magnolia Science Academy 4 6-10 182 Year 1 No Yes 761 767 4 5 76 12 0 8 29 60 18 16 2 2 0 1 2
W 4 7740 Westwood Elementary K- 5 520 Yes Yes 945 940 10 3 6 12 20 6 5 10 67 5 16 1 0 1 1
Background/Context about the Petitioner: Emerson Community Charter is applying to become an
affiliated LAUSD charter school.
Governing Board: LAUSD
Description of Philosophy: Emerson Middle School is committed to providing an
environment that both supports and challenges every student to attain their highest level of
social, intellectual, and physical development. By providing 21
st
century instruction and
experiences in academics, arts, technology, and athletics, students will develop the values and
knowledge that will allow them to appreciate and contribute to all aspects of our diverse world.
The schools goal of nurturing accomplished, responsible, and well rounded students is
summed up in their motto, Scholarship, Citizenship, and Achievement.
Source of Core Money: LCFF
3-5 Top Leaders: Lead Petitioner: Dimone Watson; and Charter Development Team: Ashley
Benjamin, Steven Perez, Kelly Graham, Coree Macomber, Matt Escajeda, and Tina Maokhampio
Other charter schools currently operated by the Petitioner: Not applicable.
Other charter petitions pending before LAUSD: Not applicable.
Innovative elements of the charter that could be considered best practices and replicated by
other schools: Emerson Middle School will implement a unique Academy program in which students
can select an area of interest: STEM, Arts and Media, or Sports. These Academies, in addition to the
overall instructional program at the school will implement engaging hands-on project-based lessons in
order to build students character, develop their 21
st
century skills and talents, and instill in students a
life-long love of learning.
323
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

W
I
T
H
I
N

A

2
-
M
I
L
E

R
A
D
I
U
S
E
m
e
r
s
o
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
1
6
5
0

S
e
l
b
y

A
v
e
.
,

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

C
A

9
0
0
2
4
G
r
a
d
e
s

6
-
8
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W
4
3
7
2
6
F
a
i
r
b
u
r
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
7
3

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
0
9
7
6
1
0
1
0
9
8
3
0
4
6
4
6
9
4
1
9
0
1
1
1
W
1
3
1
2
3
C
l
o
v
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
3
7
9

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
5
2
9
5
7
1
0
9
2
1
8
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
8
2
6
1
0
4
1
2
2
1
1
W
1
5
9
0
4
O
v
e
r
l
a
n
d

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
9
9

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
6
9
5
8
1
0
8
8
9
3
0
0
3
7
6
3
5
2
1
3
0
0
0
W
4
6
2
6
0
R
i
c
h
l
a
n
d

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
1
2
8
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
8
5
7
8
5
4
3
5
8
1
6
7
2
3
1
4
7
3
9
1
2
5
0
0
0
2
W
4
6
9
3
2
N
o
r
a

S
t
e
r
r
y

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
1
6
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
N
o
8
1
4
8
0
1
5
6
7
6
2
2
8
2
9
1
7
7
0
1
1
1
4
3
0
1
0
0
W
4
7
6
1
6
W
a
r
n
e
r

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
0
3

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
6
1
9
5
8
1
0
9
4
1
0
2
1
2
2
4
7
9
1
1
3
1
0
0
1
W
4
2
5
4
8
B
r
o
c
k
t
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
1
7
4
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
7
8
7
9
5
4
6
8
0
2
4
9
3
5
2
3
7
8
9
7
4
2
0
0
0
W
4
8
8
8
6
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y

S
e
n
i
o
r

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
1
3
3
6
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
4
7
7
5
0
5
8
7
4
1
1
2
0
9
3
7
5
8
9
2
2
8
2
1
0
0
W
4
8
1
2
3
R
a
l
p
h

W
a
l
d
o

E
m
e
r
s
o
n

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
6
6
1
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
2
8
7
6
5
4
1
5
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
2
6
5
5
1
9
1
8
5
2
1
0
1
W
4
8
4
8
1
D
a
n
i
e
l

W
e
b
s
t
e
r

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
6
4
3
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
1
3
7
2
6
2
4
7
2
2
5
9
1
5
2
6
6
3
9
2
4
1
1
1
1
0
X
R
4
8
0
1
1
M
a
g
n
o
l
i
a

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

4
6
-
1
0
1
8
2
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
Y
e
s
7
6
1
7
6
7
4
5
7
6
1
2
0
8
2
9
6
0
1
8
1
6
2
2
0
1
2
W
4
7
7
4
0
W
e
s
t
w
o
o
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
2
0

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
5
9
4
0
1
0
3
6
1
2
2
0
6
5
1
0
6
7
5
1
6
1
0
1
1
P
l
e
a
s
e

n
o
t
e
:

S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s

m
a
y

n
o
t

s
u
m

t
o

1
0
0

d
u
e

t
o

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s

o
f
:

o
t
h
e
r
,

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
,

o
r

n
o
n
-
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
S
p
a
n
:
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
:
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
w
a
s

n
o
t

o
p
e
n
e
d

in

2
0
1
1
-
1
2

o
r

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
.

#

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
d
id

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
lid

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

r
a
n
k
s
.
5
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4
1

o
f

1
324
0123456789
$
G
G
GF
West ESC
Admin
Office
Magnolia
Science
Acad #4
Magnolia
Science
Academy 6
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E

4
0
5
IN
TE
R
S
TATE
10
SAN
VICENTE BLVD
W
P
IC
O
B
L
V
D
S
S
E
P
U
L
V
E
D
A
B
L
V
D
W
IL
S
H
IR
E
BLVD
W
S
U
N
S
E
T

B
L
V
D
S

B
U
N
D
Y

D
R
S

B
E
V
E
R
L
Y

D
R
S
U
N
S
E
T
B
L
V
D
P
IC
O
B
L
V
D
B
U
R
T
O
NWY
W
O
L
Y
M
P
IC
B
L
V
D
O
C
E
A
N
P
A
R
K
B
L
V
D
N
A
T
IO
N
A
L
BLVD
N
A
TIONAL PL
O
L
Y
M
P
IC
B
LV
D
V
E
N
IC
E
B
L
V
D
W
E
S
T
W
O
O
D

B
L
V
D
N
S
E
P
U
L
V
E
D
A
B
L
V
D
S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
IC
A
B
L
V
D
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
B
L
V
D
W 3RD ST
B
E
V
E
R
W
I
L

D
R
S
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
G
L
E
N
B
L
V
D
N
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
D
R
BEVERLY
HILLS
LOS
ANGELES
SANTA
MONICA
Fairburn
Ave
Clover
Ave
Overland
Ave
Palms
Richland
Ave
Sterry
Brentwood
Mag
Warner
Ave
Emerson
Middle
Westwood
Palms
Middle
Webster
Middle
Brockton
Ave
Castle
Heights
Community
Mag Chrtr
University
High
EMERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL

reproduced except as licensed by LAUSD and
Los Angeles County.
MPD-2730
5/8/2014
LAUSD Boundaries
LAUSD Boundary
West Educational Service Center Area WEST
Area of Interest
Emerson Middle School
2 mi. Radius of
Emerson Middle School
Emerson
Middle School
WEST
Charter School G
# Elementary School
" Middle School
# High School
!(
Planned Early
Education Center
Planned Classroom
Addition _
Planned Playground
Expansion
[
^_
Planned School
Reconfiguration
#0
School
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Span School
Planned School
Closed School
Administrative Site
Charter School
Magnet School
325
0123456789
J UNE 10, 2014
Final petition
Lottery form
(213) 241-0399
326
0123456789
TAB 24
Approval of the Charter for Public Policy Charter School
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of the proposed charter for Public Policy Charter School for five (5) years,
beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020, to serve 300 students in grades 5-6 in year 1 and up to 600 students
in grades 5-8 by the end of its charter term.
Background:
On April 17, 2014, Public Policy Charter School submitted a charter petition application to the Charter Schools
Division, which included the number of signatures required under Education Code 47605(a). A Public
Hearing was held on May 13, 2014. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by the
Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District staff. The 60-day statutory
timeline for Board action on this petition continues until June 16, 2014.
Staff affirms that Public Policy Charter School has met the requirements set forth in Education Code 47605,
based on review and consideration of its charter school petition application.
Public Policy Charter School is proposed to be located in Central Los Angeles in the vicinity of USC and
Exposition Park. This area is served primarily by Educational Service Center West as well as Educational
Service Center East, and in Board District 1, 2 and 7. The school will serve 300 students in grades 5-6 in its
first year and expand to serve 600 students in grades 5-8 by 2020. Public Policy Charter School intends to
submit an application for facilities under Proposition 39, and the school has also surveyed private properties for
potential lease.
The vision of Public Policy Charter School is for alumni to earn college degrees, and advance to fulfilling
careers where they promote economic development and social justice to impact public policy in a manner that
benefits society.
Public Policy Charter Schools mission is to provide a safe, supportive, and dynamic learning environment that
delivers a rigorous and engaging, college preparatory curriculum. Through the study of public policy, learners
will be equipped with the knowledge, skills, and fortitude to advocate for themselves and their community
through leadership and action.
Public Policy Charter School will utilize project based learning to engage students in a cognitively demanding
way in order to be college and career ready. Authentic learning tasks will help fulfill the school mission and
develop leaders engaged in Civics Literacy with confidence, experience and skills to positively impact their
community. Instructional methods will focus on real-world applications and the development of 21
st
century
competencies that integrate technology and multi-media. In alignment with the schools public policy focus, the
Science, Technology Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) curriculum will be imbedded in the
instructional program. Public Policy Charter School will strive to be a model of effective teaching and learning.
A comprehensive professional development program will include explicit strategies for reading instruction,
engaging in critical literacy across disciplines, and support for teachers to skillfully deliver the Common Core
powered by Legistar
327
0123456789
engaging in critical literacy across disciplines, and support for teachers to skillfully deliver the Common Core
standards. Weekly professional development will build in time for teachers to share best practice, analyze data,
focus on strategies to meet the cognitive demands of Common Core, and work collaboratively around
instructional strategies for English Learners. The school will use data daily to assess student learning and drive
instructional planning. Utilizing digital curriculum- will provide reports for monitoring and assessing student
growth. Grade-level cohorts will execute data-driven action plans to ensure every child learns at the highest
academic level and receives the structure and strategies needed to raise proficiency.
Public Policy Charter School will make every effort to recruit a diverse student population in the target area of
Central Los Angeles. For example, the demographics of John Muir Middle School, a District school within a
two-mile radius of the proposed charter school location, are 81% Latino, 18% African American, 25% English
Learners, and 65% Free and Reduced Lunch (CDE). Public Policy Charter School indicates in its petition that
the charter school will recruit students of various racial and ethnic groups in the Central Los Angeles area so as
to achieve a balance that is reflective of the general population residing within the territorial jurisdiction of
LAUSD. The school will maintain an accurate accounting of the ethnic and racial balance of students enrolled
in the school. It will also keep on file documentation of the efforts the school makes to achieve racial and ethnic
balance.
Current members of the Public Policy Charter School Board of Directors completed questionnaires regarding
conflicts of interest. A due diligence review of the Public Policy Charter School executives is being performed
by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Staff will inform the Board of any material negative findings and
take appropriate action.
If approved, the Public Policy Charter School charter will have a five-year term, beginning July 1, 2015 until
June 30, 2020. As part of its oversight responsibility, the Charter Schools Division will perform ongoing
Expected Outcomes:
Public Policy Charter School is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local, state,
and federal ordinances, laws and regulations, and the terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The
measurable pupil outcomes and method by which pupil progress toward outcomes will be measured as are set
forth in the petition.
Yes - The approval of the charter petition for Public Policy Charter School would grant its Board of Directors
the right to operate the charter school under the terms of the approved charter for a five (5) year period,
beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020.
No - The denial of the charter petition would result in the Board of Directors for Public Policy Charter
School being prohibited from opening the charter school, unless Public Policy Charter School appeals the
denial and the charter is granted by the Los Angeles County Board of Education or the California State Board
of Education. This Board Report 482 - 13/14 and accompanying documents shall constitute the Board of
Educations adopted written findings of fact for the denial of Public Policy Charter Schools petition.
powered by Legistar
328
0123456789
Budget Impact:
Education Code 47604(c), a school district that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or as, a
nonprofit public benefit corporation is not held liable for the charter schools debts or obligations as long as the
school district complies with all oversight responsibilities. The District will continue to have monitoring and
oversight responsibility for charter school finances, as specified in the Charter Schools Act. Any modifications
to the charter schools petition or operations with significant financial implications would require District
approval prior to implementation. Petition approval is also contingent upon adequate liability insurance
coverage.
Public Policy Charter School has selected LAUSD SELPA Option 2. Under the current LAUSD SELPA
Understanding (MOU). Should Public Policy Charter School not comply with this requirement, this Board
item will be withdrawn from the agenda.
Attachments:
Informative
powered by Legistar
329
0123456789
PUBLIC POLICY CHARTER SCHOOL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 482 - 13114
June 10,2014
The proposed action would initiate the charter for Public Policy Charter School, beginning July I,
2015until June 30, 2020 to serve 300 students in grades 5-6 in year I and up to 600 students in grades 5-8
by the end of its charter term.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. 11 should be noted,
however, that although State legislation allows students to attend a charter school from any area in the
state, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is under Court Order, Crawford v. LAUSD,
which applies to all schools within or chartered through the LAUSD. Any modifications to the Court-
Ordered Integration Program must first be approved by Student Integration Services.
The approval of this charter petition would grant the charter of Public Policy Charter School for five (5)
Integration funding. The charter school will be responsible for maintaining the Court Order and
providing information requested by the LAUSD as set forth in the Charter petition. Modifications or
school decisions cannot negatively impact or cause additional costs to the Court-ordered Integration
budget.
V. Analyze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation, Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
If the Charter goals are met, there should be positive results on the five (5) Harms of Racial Isolation
wh ich are low academic achievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opportunities,
interracial hostility and intolerance, and overcrowded conditions. The Court-ordered Integration Program
for participating students will operate under various Court Orders for schools within the Los Angeles
Unified School District. Any modification of the Court-ordered Integration Program must first be
approved by Student Integration Services.
VI. If proposed action affects negatively any desegregation program, list other option(s) identified:
If the District Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
PREPARED BY:
MONIQUE GAL VEZ
Advisor
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 482 - 13114
Interim Director
June 10,2014
330
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
331
0123456789
No. 482 13/14
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR PROPOSED PUBLIC POLICY CHARTER
SCHOOL
Attached please find supporting documentation for the proposed Public Policy Charter School which will be
presented to the Board of Education for action on J une 10, 2014.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. 28
th
Street
2. 36
th
St EEC
3. 42
nd
St
4. 49
th
St
5. 52
nd
St
6. 59
th
St
7. 61
st
St
8. 68
th
St
9. Angeles Mesa
10. Bradley Glbl Awr Mag
11. Bright
12. Budlong Ave
13. Estrella
14. Harmony
15. Huerta
16. J ones
17. J ones PC
18. Martin Luther King J r.
19. Lizarraga
20. Mack
1. AcceleratedElementary
2. Alexander Science Center
3. Apple Academy Charter Public School
4. Aspire Inskeep Academy
5. Aspire- Slauson Academy
6. Aspire- Tate Academy
7. Celerity Nascent
8. Dantzler Prep Charter
9. Garr Academy Of Math and Entrepreneurial
Studies (GAMES)
10. Global Education Academy
11. KIPP Empower Academy
12. New Heights
13. Synergy Charter
332
0123456789
21. Main St
22. Maple PC
23. Menlo Ave
24. Normandie Ave
25. Ride SMART Academy
26. South Region ES #10
27. South Region ES #11
28. Trinity Street
29. Vermont Ave
30. Wadsworth Ave
31. Weemes
32. Western Ave
33. West Vernon Ave
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. Adams Middle
2. Bethune Middle
3. Carver Middle
4. Clinton Middle
5. Los Angeles Academy Middle
6. Muir Middle
7. Obama Global Prep Academy
1. Alliance College-Ready MS Academy #12
2. Dantzler Prep. Charter Middle
3. Global Education Academy MS
4. KIPP Scholar Academy
5. TEACH Academy of Technologies
HIGH SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. Angelou Community High
2. Angelou Community High Fine & Perf Arts
3. Angelou HS Social J ustice Sch Global Issues
Academy
4. Crenshaw BET Mag
5. Crenshaw STEMM Mag
6. Crenshaw VAPA Mag
7. Hawkins High C/DAGS
8. Hawkins High CHAS
9. Hawkins High RISE
10. Lanterman High
11. Manuel Arts High
12. Orthopaedic Med Mag HS
1. Academy of Science and Engineering
2. Alliance College-Ready Academy HS #5
3. Alliance Ouchi-O Donovan Charter High
4. Animo J ackie Robinson
5. Annenberg High
6. Synergy Quantum Academy
7. USC Hybrid High
SPAN SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. 32
nd
St Mag
2. Foshay Learning Center
3. Lanterman High (SPEC)
1. Accelerated Charter
2. Celerity Dyad Charter
3. New Heights
333
0123456789
ADULT SCHOOLS
None
None
None
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
334
0123456789
Page 1 of 3
BRIEFING PAGE
J UNE 10, 2014
The Charter Schools Division recommends Board of Education approval of Public Policy Charter School
basedon the findings from the Divisions rigorous and comprehensive charter review process for elements
1-16. These elements were reviewed by the Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel,
and other District staff.
Based on the criteria set forth in Education Code 47605 for charter school authorization, and upon
The following list provides a brief overview about the charter petition and its petitioner:
Lead Petitioner Applying for Charter: Yasodara Sonali Tucker, ED.D and Donna Faye J acobson
Grades Served: 5-8
Projected Start Date: August 15, 2015
Instructional Focus: Public Policy Charter School will utilize project based learning to engage
students in a cognitively demanding way in order to be college and career ready. Instructional methods
will focus on real-world applications and the development of 21
st
century competencies that integrate
technology and multi-media. In alignment with the schools public policy focus, the Science,
Technology Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) curriculum will be imbedded in the
instructional program. Public Policy Charter School will strive to be a model of effective teaching and
learning. A comprehensive professional development program will include explicit strategies for
reading instruction, engaging in critical literacy across disciplines, and support for teachers to skillfully
deliver the Common Core standards. Weekly professional development builds in time for teachers to
share best practice, analyze data, focus on strategies to meet the cognitive demands of Common Core,
and for collaborative work around instructional strategies for English Learners.
Number of Students: 300 in year 1 and 600 by year 5.
Location Address or Target Neighborhood: Central Los Angeles
Facility Status/Location: Will apply for Prop. 39 and surveying properties to lease.
LAUSD Planned Facilities in the Area: None
335
0123456789
Page 2 of 3
ESC BD
Loc.
Code School
Grade
Span
2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W 1 3795 Fifty-Ninth Street Elementary K- 5 260 Year 5 Yes No 709 699 1 3 57 13 9 24 13 54 0 44 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 3808 Fifty-Second Street Elementary K- 5 527 Year 5 Yes Yes 698 671 1 2 76 12 4 42 19 80 0 19 0 0 0 0 1
XP 1 3959 Forty-Second Street Elementary K- 5 188 Year 5 Yes No 641 629 1 1 80 13 6 7 8 28 2 68 0 0 1 0 1
W 1 7151 Lenicia B. Weemes Elementary K- 5 576 Year 5 Yes Yes 750 741 2 4 69 11 6 24 23 70 0 28 1 0 1 0 1
W 1 6808 Sixty-First Street Elementary K- 6 380 Year 3 Yes Yes 775 766 3 6 64 14 7 36 32 82 1 16 0 0 1 0 0
E 5 7589 Wadsworth Avenue Elementary K- 5 506 Year 5 Yes Yes 726 712 1 2 60 12 8 56 24 97 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 5630 Normandie Avenue Elementary K- 5 595 Year 5 Yes No 739 734 2 4 58 14 6 34 16 77 0 21 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 5247 Menlo Avenue Elementary K- 5 399 No No 754 783 4 9 79 18 7 40 25 80 0 19 0 0 1 0 0
XP 1 6534 Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary K- 5 302 Year 3 No No 715 752 2 6 54 8 8 25 23 67 0 30 0 0 1 0 1
E 7 3932 Forty-Ninth Street Elementary K- 5 566 Year 5 No No 676 709 1 2 76 8 7 42 35 92 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
E 5 4681 Harmony Elementary K- 5 465 Year 5 No Yes 726 723 1 4 80 9 4 49 28 93 0 5 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 7288 Twenty-Eighth Street Elementary K- 5 533 Year 5 No No 711 735 2 3 63 10 20 48 32 98 0 2 0 0 1 0 0
S 7 6795 Sixty-Eighth Street Elementary K- 6 566 Year 5 No No 722 733 2 4 74 13 11 35 25 82 0 17 0 0 0 0 0
E 7 5068 Main Street Elementary K- 5 512 Year 5 No No 744 740 2 4 67 12 10 48 32 91 0 9 0 0 1 0 0
E 2 7219 Trinity Street Elementary 2- 5 434 Year 1 Yes Yes 760 744 2 4 68 12 13 45 33 96 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
E 7 7654 West Vernon Avenue Elementary K- 5 463 Year 5 Yes Yes 750 731 2 5 80 11 6 40 40 90 0 8 0 0 1 0 1
W 1 7671 Western Avenue Elementary K- 5 351 Year 5 Yes No 764 758 3 8 82 17 15 32 19 74 0 25 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 2123 Angeles Mesa Elementary K- 5 277 Year 5 Yes No 705 684 1 3 60 18 4 18 14 51 0 48 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 2616 Budlong Avenue Elementary K- 5 631 Year 1 No No 724 755 2 4 62 11 15 32 27 79 0 19 0 0 1 0 0
E 1 7479 Vermont Avenue Elementary K- 5 485 No No 790 807 5 9 49 12 9 34 35 88 1 9 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 7164 Birdielee V. Bright Elementary K- 5 482 Year 5 No No 777 808 5 6 48 10 18 27 21 79 0 20 0 0 0 0 1
XP 2 2944 Dolores Huerta Elementary K- 5 284 Yes No 726 721 1 2 60 6 9 46 32 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 2311 South Region Elementary #10 K- 5 350 650 B 73 9 5 45 21 83 0 15 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 5113 John W. Mack Elementary K- 5 248 Year 5 No No 721 738 2 4 56 15 6 35 20 72 1 25 1 0 0 0 0
E 7 2942 Estrella Elementary K- 5 336 Year 2 Yes No 733 725 1 3 61 9 6 44 33 93 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 5112 Dr. James Edward Jones Primary Center K- 2 29 No Yes 765 770 3 90 7 0 52 0 79 0 17 0 0 3 0 0
E 2 2943 Quincy Jones Elementary K- 5 220 Year 2 Yes Yes 782 730 2 4 61 7 7 46 33 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
E 7 4680 Ricardo Lizarraga Elementary K- 5 466 Year 1 Yes No 783 775 3 7 63 9 14 51 29 95 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
E 5 2308 Central Region Elementary #21 K- 5 266 742 B 84 10 6 41 32 93 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 2312 South Region Elementary #11 K- 6 364 698 B 77 7 7 42 22 82 0 16 0 0 0 0 1
XP 1 8743 Manual Arts Senior High 9-12 1171 Yes Yes 626 593 1 4 62 13 6 30 41 81 1 17 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 7123 Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet K- 5 262 Year 4 Yes No 687 666 1 1 77 12 5 10 2 24 0 74 0 0 1 1 1
E 2 8853 Orthopaedic Hospital 9-12 661 Yes No 785 780 6 8 87 3 23 7 74 95 1 3 1 0 0 0 0
XP 1 8596 Crenshaw Senior High 9-12 793 Year 5 No No 550 566 1 3 54 14 6 8 10 28 0 70 0 0 0 0 1
E 2 8009 John Adams Middle 6- 8 1031 Year 5 No No 725 742 3 7 68 13 22 23 58 98 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
XP 5 8094 George Washington Carver Middle 6- 8 1082 Year 2 No No 623 637 1 1 77 11 9 31 50 92 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
XP 1 8255 John Muir Middle 6- 8 1176 Year 5 Yes Yes 687 644 1 2 65 12 9 25 37 81 0 18 0 0 0 0 0
E 7 8200 Los Angeles Academy Middle 6- 8 1664 Year 5 Yes No 708 695 1 6 75 10 15 23 54 91 0 8 0 0 0 0 1
S 7 8060 Mary McLeod Bethune Middle 7- 8 1349 Year 5 No No 685 685 1 6 82 10 12 23 44 86 0 13 0 0 0 0 0
E 2 8062 William Jefferson Clinton Middle 6- 8 870 Yes No 673 639 1 1 85 10 9 30 48 94 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
XP 1 6868 Barack Obama Global Preparation Academy 6- 8 1119 Year 2 No No 620 622 1 2 71 15 7 24 26 69 0 31 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 7137 Thirty-Second Street USC Performing Arts K- 8 919 Year 4 Yes Yes 814 806 5 8 84 6 26 9 30 70 5 17 5 0 2 0 0
E 2 1919 Frank Lanterman 7-12 102 862 912 C C 74 100 0 77 1 78 1 10 4 5 0 1 1
W 1 8132 Foshay Learning Center K-12 1794 Year 5 Yes No 719 710 2 2 56 8 17 16 41 82 0 17 0 0 0 0 0
W 1 7665 Augustus F. Hawkins High B Community Hea 9-11 307 488 B 74 13 3 30 30 80 0 18 1 0 0 0 1
W 1 7666 Augustus F. Hawkins High C Responsible I 9-11 337 481 B 61 8 4 26 26 73 0 23 0 0 0 0 4
E 7 7722 Social Justice Schools: Fine Arts Academ9-12 569 Year 1 Yes Yes 578 525 1 1 61 11 4 36 39 87 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
E 7 8563 Social Justice Schools: Global Issues Ac 9-12 506 Yes Yes 584 523 1 2 57 16 7 31 39 89 0 9 0 0 0 0 1
W 1 8713 Augustus F. Hawkins High A Critical Desi9-11 330 520 B 82 10 4 29 37 87 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
XP 1 8584 Crenshaw Vapa Magnet 9-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XP 1 8595 Crenshaw Bet Magnet 9-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2 2013 Accelerated Elementary Charter K- 5 121 Year 1 No No 745 760 3 93 10 0 59 12 88 1 5 0 0 0 0 7
XR 1 2025 Global Education Academy K- 5 159 Yes Yes 849 844 7 10 100 9 0 31 43 95 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5 2116 Celerity Dyad Charter K- 8 484 Year 1 Yes Yes 871 888 8 10 100 9 0 46 40 94 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 2126 Lou Dantzler Preparatory Charter Element K- 4 205 Year 2 No No 796 793 4 9 95 9 0 2 0 7 0 87 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 2158 KIPP Empower Academy K- 1 104 991 B 94 6 0 8 0 12 0 85 0 0 0 0 4
XR 7 2253 Aspire Slauson Academy Charter K- 6 208 Year 1 Yes No 783 757 3 5 92 8 0 35 25 88 1 9 0 0 0 0 1
XR 7 2254 Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter K- 6 215 Year 1 No No 752 748 2 5 96 10 0 40 30 88 0 11 0 0 0 0 0
XR 7 2255 Aspire Inskeep Academy Charter K- 6 238 Year 1 No No 776 773 3 6 96 12 0 40 27 87 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 2259 Apple Academy Charter Public K- 5 206 708 B 88 7 0 10 16 39 0 59 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 2925 Celerity Nascent Charter K- 8 341 Year 4 Yes Yes 910 891 9 10 99 7 0 13 23 48 0 52 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 4069 Garr Academy of Math and Entrepreneurial K- 5 221 Year 2 Yes Yes 803 779 4 8 70 10 7 12 2 9 0 87 0 0 0 1 3
XR 5 5187 KIPP Scholar Academy 5- 5 100 777 B 88 26 4 19 5 39 0 60 0 0 0 0 1
XR 5202 Alliance College-Ready MS Acad #12 6- 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 5206 Global Education Academy Middle School 6- 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 5583 New Heights Charter K- 8 271 Year 2 No No 745 804 5 9 97 14 0 26 15 68 0 32 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 5982 TEACH Academy of Technologies 5- 7 253 No No 731 732 2 9 96 11 0 30 17 55 1 44 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2 7029 Synergy Charter Academy K- 5 202 Yes Yes 907 935 10 10 100 13 16 32 34 95 1 4 0 0 0 0 0
XR 2 7672 USC Hybrid High 9- 9 125 688 B 70 10 0 12 22 66 4 25 2 1 0 0 3
XR 1 7673 Academy of Science and Engineering 9- 10 144 644 B 85 16 0 21 31 71 1 18 0 0 0 0 10
XR 7 7692 Synergy Quantum Academy 9-11 453 Yes Yes 731 663 2 3 92 9 11 23 57 94 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 8451 Lou Dantzler Preparatory Charter Middle6- 8 246 Year 2 No No 625 643 1 1 89 12 0 2 4 14 0 83 0 0 2 0 2
XR 2 8818 Animo Jackie Robinson High 9-12 439 Year 1 No No 753 775 6 10 98 9 0 26 65 98 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
XR 1 8824 Alliance College-Ready Academy High No. 9-12 475 Year 3 Yes Yes 798 765 6 10 86 8 0 16 49 85 0 13 0 0 0 0 2
XR 1 8825 Alliance William and Carol Ouchi Academy 9-12 443 Year 2 No No 772 773 6 9 93 6 0 13 52 86 0 14 0 0 0 0 0
XR 7 8828 Wallis AnnenbergHigh 9-12 374 Year 3 5 5 71 4 0 13 40 62 0 5 1 0 4 0 28
W 1 5111 Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Cent K- 5 397 Year 5 No No 766 776 3 2 41 10 7 22 18 72 1 23 1 0 1 0 2
XR 7 2015 Accelerated K- 8 581 Year 5 Yes No 773 767 3 6 92 9 0 29 37 79 1 10 0 1 3 0 7
336
0123456789
Page 3 of 3
Background/Context about the Petitioner: The Public Policy Charter School Board of Directors
and petitioners do not operate any sister charters. However, many have extensive experience with
charter schools.
Board of Directors:
Laura Baron
J udy Burton
Ana Campos
Steven Holguin
Emilio Pack, ED. D.
Mayra Rivas
Rohit Shukla
Description of Mission: Public Policy Charter Schools mission is to provide a safe, supportive, and
dynamic learning environment that delivers a rigorous and engaging, college preparatory curriculum.
Through the study of public policy, learners will be equipped with the knowledge, skills, and fortitude
to advocate for themselves and their community through leadership and action.
Description of Vision: Public Policy Charter Schools vision is for alumni to earn college degrees, and
advance to fulfilling careers where they promote economic development and social justice to impact
public policy in a manner that benefits society.
Source of Core Money: Public Policy Charter School will apply for the Walton grant and the Public
Charter Schools Grant in addition to selling revenues for startup costs until the Advanced
Apportionment disbursement if received in October 2015.
3-5 Top Leaders:
Sonali Tucker, Lead Petition and Executive Director
Donna J acobson, Lead Petitioner and Principal
Laura Baron, Board President
J udy Burton, Board Member
Other charter schools currently operated by the Petitioner:
None
Submission of this charter application to other jurisdiction(s) for approval: Not applicable
Innovative elements of the charter that could be considered best practices and replicated by
other schools: Students will be exposed to the different aspects and arenas for public policy, in all
fields, and work with community mentors to gain outside the classroom learning experiences. In
addition to the public policy focus, STEM curriculum will be embedded in the instructional program to
include Art and Design (from STEM to STEAM). Vocabulary development is a critical area of reading
instruction for Public Policys student population. Professional development will emphasize explicit
strategies such as critical literacy. The learners will be involved as active participants in the reading
process through the analysis of the authors purpose. Public Policy will also hold professional
development sessions on best practices for conducting peer visitations and for providing feedback and
support.
337
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

W
I
T
H
I
N

A

2
-
M
I
L
E

R
A
D
I
U
S
P
u
b
l
i
c

P
o
l
i
c
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
4
3
7
3

S
.

V
e
r
m
o
n
t
,

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
,

C
A

9
0
0
3
7
G
r
a
d
e
s

5
-
8
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W
1
3
7
9
5
F
i
f
t
y
-
N
i
n
t
h

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
6
0
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
0
9
6
9
9
1
3
5
7
1
3
9
2
4
1
3
5
4
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
3
8
0
8
F
i
f
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
2
7
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
9
8
6
7
1
1
2
7
6
1
2
4
4
2
1
9
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
X
P
1
3
9
5
9
F
o
r
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
1
8
8
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
6
4
1
6
2
9
1
1
8
0
1
3
6
7
8
2
8
2
6
8
0
0
1
0
1
W
1
7
1
5
1
L
e
n
i
c
i
a

B
.

W
e
e
m
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
7
6
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
5
0
7
4
1
2
4
6
9
1
1
6
2
4
2
3
7
0
0
2
8
1
0
1
0
1
W
1
6
8
0
8
S
i
x
t
y
-
F
i
r
s
t

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
3
8
0
Y
e
a
r

3
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
7
5
7
6
6
3
6
6
4
1
4
7
3
6
3
2
8
2
1
1
6
0
0
1
0
0
E
5
7
5
8
9
W
a
d
s
w
o
r
t
h

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
0
6
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
2
6
7
1
2
1
2
6
0
1
2
8
5
6
2
4
9
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
5
6
3
0
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
9
5
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
3
9
7
3
4
2
4
5
8
1
4
6
3
4
1
6
7
7
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
5
2
4
7
M
e
n
l
o

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
3
9
9

N
o
N
o
7
5
4
7
8
3
4
9
7
9
1
8
7
4
0
2
5
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
1
0
0
X
P
1
6
5
3
4
M
a
r
t
i
n

L
u
t
h
e
r

K
i
n
g

J
r
.

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
3
0
2
Y
e
a
r

3
N
o
N
o
7
1
5
7
5
2
2
6
5
4
8
8
2
5
2
3
6
7
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
E
7
3
9
3
2
F
o
r
t
y
-
N
i
n
t
h

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
6
6
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
6
7
6
7
0
9
1
2
7
6
8
7
4
2
3
5
9
2
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
E
5
4
6
8
1
H
a
r
m
o
n
y

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
6
5
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
Y
e
s
7
2
6
7
2
3
1
4
8
0
9
4
4
9
2
8
9
3
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
E
2
7
2
8
8
T
w
e
n
t
y
-
E
i
g
h
t
h

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
3
3
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
1
1
7
3
5
2
3
6
3
1
0
2
0
4
8
3
2
9
8
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
S
7
6
7
9
5
S
i
x
t
y
-
E
i
g
h
t
h

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
5
6
6
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
2
2
7
3
3
2
4
7
4
1
3
1
1
3
5
2
5
8
2
0
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
E
7
5
0
6
8
M
a
i
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
5
1
2
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
4
4
7
4
0
2
4
6
7
1
2
1
0
4
8
3
2
9
1
0
9
0
0
1
0
0
E
2
7
2
1
9
T
r
i
n
i
t
y

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
-

5
4
3
4
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
6
0
7
4
4
2
4
6
8
1
2
1
3
4
5
3
3
9
6
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
E
7
7
6
5
4
W
e
s
t

V
e
r
n
o
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
6
3
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
5
0
7
3
1
2
5
8
0
1
1
6
4
0
4
0
9
0
0
8
0
0
1
0
1
W
1
7
6
7
1
W
e
s
t
e
r
n

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
3
5
1
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
6
4
7
5
8
3
8
8
2
1
7
1
5
3
2
1
9
7
4
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
2
1
2
3
A
n
g
e
l
e
s

M
e
s
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
7
7
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
0
5
6
8
4
1
3
6
0
1
8
4
1
8
1
4
5
1
0
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
2
6
1
6
B
u
d
l
o
n
g

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
6
3
1
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
N
o
7
2
4
7
5
5
2
4
6
2
1
1
1
5
3
2
2
7
7
9
0
1
9
0
0
1
0
0
E
1
7
4
7
9
V
e
r
m
o
n
t

A
v
e
n
u
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
8
5

N
o
N
o
7
9
0
8
0
7
5
9
4
9
1
2
9
3
4
3
5
8
8
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
7
1
6
4
B
i
r
d
i
e
l
e
e

V
.

B
r
i
g
h
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
8
2
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
7
7
8
0
8
5
6
4
8
1
0
1
8
2
7
2
1
7
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
X
P
2
2
9
4
4
D
o
l
o
r
e
s

H
u
e
r
t
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
8
4

Y
e
s
N
o
7
2
6
7
2
1
1
2
6
0
6
9
4
6
3
2
9
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
2
3
1
1
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

#
1
0
K
-

5
3
5
0

6
5
0
B
7
3
9
5
4
5
2
1
8
3
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
5
1
1
3
J
o
h
n

W
.

M
a
c
k

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
4
8
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
2
1
7
3
8
2
4
5
6
1
5
6
3
5
2
0
7
2
1
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
E
7
2
9
4
2
E
s
t
r
e
l
l
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
3
3
6
Y
e
a
r

2
Y
e
s
N
o
7
3
3
7
2
5
1
3
6
1
9
6
4
4
3
3
9
3
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
5
1
1
2
D
r
.

J
a
m
e
s

E
d
w
a
r
d

J
o
n
e
s

P
r
i
m
a
r
y

C
e
n
t
e
r
K
-

2
2
9

N
o
Y
e
s
7
6
5
7
7
0
3

9
0
7
0
5
2
0
7
9
0
1
7
0
0
3
0
0
E
2
2
9
4
3
Q
u
i
n
c
y

J
o
n
e
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
2
2
0
Y
e
a
r

2
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
8
2
7
3
0
2
4
6
1
7
7
4
6
3
3
9
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
E
7
4
6
8
0
R
i
c
a
r
d
o

L
i
z
a
r
r
a
g
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

5
4
6
6
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
N
o
7
8
3
7
7
5
3
7
6
3
9
1
4
5
1
2
9
9
5
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
E
5
2
3
0
8
C
e
n
t
r
a
l

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

#
2
1
K
-

5
2
6
6

7
4
2
B
8
4
1
0
6
4
1
3
2
9
3
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
2
3
1
2
S
o
u
t
h

R
e
g
i
o
n

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

#
1
1
K
-

6
3
6
4

6
9
8
B
7
7
7
7
4
2
2
2
8
2
0
1
6
0
0
0
0
1
X
P
1
8
7
4
3
M
a
n
u
a
l

A
r
t
s

S
e
n
i
o
r

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
1
1
7
1

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
2
6
5
9
3
1
4
6
2
1
3
6
3
0
4
1
8
1
1
1
7
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
7
1
2
3
T
o
m

B
r
a
d
l
e
y

G
l
o
b
a
l

A
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s

M
a
g
n
e
t
K
-

5
2
6
2
Y
e
a
r

4
Y
e
s
N
o
6
8
7
6
6
6
1
1
7
7
1
2
5
1
0
2
2
4
0
7
4
0
0
1
1
1
E
2
8
8
5
3
O
r
t
h
o
p
a
e
d
i
c

H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
9
-
1
2
6
6
1

Y
e
s
N
o
7
8
5
7
8
0
6
8
8
7
3
2
3
7
7
4
9
5
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
X
P
1
8
5
9
6
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w

S
e
n
i
o
r

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
7
9
3
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
5
5
0
5
6
6
1
3
5
4
1
4
6
8
1
0
2
8
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
E
2
8
0
0
9
J
o
h
n

A
d
a
m
s

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
1
0
3
1
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
2
5
7
4
2
3
7
6
8
1
3
2
2
2
3
5
8
9
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
5
8
0
9
4
G
e
o
r
g
e

W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n

C
a
r
v
e
r

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
1
0
8
2
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
6
2
3
6
3
7
1
1
7
7
1
1
9
3
1
5
0
9
2
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
1
8
2
5
5
J
o
h
n

M
u
i
r

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
1
1
7
6
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
6
8
7
6
4
4
1
2
6
5
1
2
9
2
5
3
7
8
1
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
E
7
8
2
0
0
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
1
6
6
4
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
0
8
6
9
5
1
6
7
5
1
0
1
5
2
3
5
4
9
1
0
8
0
0
0
0
1
S
7
8
0
6
0
M
a
r
y

M
c
L
e
o
d

B
e
t
h
u
n
e

M
i
d
d
l
e
7
-

8
1
3
4
9
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
6
8
5
6
8
5
1
6
8
2
1
0
1
2
2
3
4
4
8
6
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
E
2
8
0
6
2
W
i
l
l
i
a
m

J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n

C
l
i
n
t
o
n

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
8
7
0

Y
e
s
N
o
6
7
3
6
3
9
1
1
8
5
1
0
9
3
0
4
8
9
4
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
1
6
8
6
8
B
a
r
a
c
k

O
b
a
m
a

G
l
o
b
a
l

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
-

8
1
1
1
9
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
6
2
0
6
2
2
1
2
7
1
1
5
7
2
4
2
6
6
9
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
7
1
3
7
T
h
i
r
t
y
-
S
e
c
o
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

U
S
C

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
i
n
g

A
r
t
s
K
-

8
9
1
9
Y
e
a
r

4
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
1
4
8
0
6
5
8
8
4
6
2
6
9
3
0
7
0
5
1
7
5
0
2
0
0
E
2
1
9
1
9
F
r
a
n
k

L
a
n
t
e
r
m
a
n
7
-
1
2
1
0
2

8
6
2
9
1
2
C
C
7
4
1
0
0
0
7
7
1
7
8
1
1
0
4
5
0
1
1
W
1
8
1
3
2
F
o
s
h
a
y

L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g

C
e
n
t
e
r
K
-
1
2
1
7
9
4
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
1
9
7
1
0
2
2
5
6
8
1
7
1
6
4
1
8
2
0
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
7
6
6
5
A
u
g
u
s
t
u
s

F
.

H
a
w
k
i
n
s

H
i
g
h

B

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

H
e
a
9
-
1
1
3
0
7

4
8
8
B
7
4
1
3
3
3
0
3
0
8
0
0
1
8
1
0
0
0
1
W
1
7
6
6
6
A
u
g
u
s
t
u
s

F
.

H
a
w
k
i
n
s

H
i
g
h

C

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e

I
9
-
1
1
3
3
7

4
8
1
B
6
1
8
4
2
6
2
6
7
3
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
4
E
7
7
7
2
2
S
o
c
i
a
l

J
u
s
t
i
c
e

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
:

F
i
n
e

A
r
t
s

A
c
a
d
e
m
9
-
1
2
5
6
9
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
5
7
8
5
2
5
1
1
6
1
1
1
4
3
6
3
9
8
7
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
E
7
8
5
6
3
S
o
c
i
a
l

J
u
s
t
i
c
e

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
:

G
l
o
b
a
l

I
s
s
u
e
s

A
c
9
-
1
2
5
0
6

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
5
8
4
5
2
3
1
2
5
7
1
6
7
3
1
3
9
8
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
W
1
8
7
1
3
A
u
g
u
s
t
u
s

F
.

H
a
w
k
i
n
s

H
i
g
h

A

C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l

D
e
s
i
9
-
1
1
3
3
0

5
2
0
B
8
2
1
0
4
2
9
3
7
8
7
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
1
8
5
8
4
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w

V
a
p
a

M
a
g
n
e
t
9
-
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
1
8
5
9
5
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w

B
e
t

M
a
g
n
e
t
9
-
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
2
2
0
1
3
A
c
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
e
d

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

5
1
2
1
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
N
o
7
4
5
7
6
0
3

9
3
1
0
0
5
9
1
2
8
8
1
5
0
0
0
0
7
X
R
1
2
0
2
5
G
l
o
b
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
K
-

5
1
5
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
4
9
8
4
4
7
1
0
1
0
0
9
0
3
1
4
3
9
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
5
2
1
1
6
C
e
l
e
r
i
t
y

D
y
a
d

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

8
4
8
4
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
7
1
8
8
8
8
1
0
1
0
0
9
0
4
6
4
0
9
4
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
2
1
2
6
L
o
u

D
a
n
t
z
l
e
r

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
o
r
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
K
-

4
2
0
5
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
9
6
7
9
3
4
9
9
5
9
0
2
0
7
0
8
7
0
0
0
0
0
S
p
a
n
:
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
:
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
w
a
s

n
o
t

o
p
e
n
e
d

in

2
0
1
1
-
1
2

o
r

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
.

#

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
d
id

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
lid

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

r
a
n
k
s
.
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
1

o
f

2
338
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

W
I
T
H
I
N

A

2
-
M
I
L
E

R
A
D
I
U
S
P
u
b
l
i
c

P
o
l
i
c
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
4
3
7
3

S
.

V
e
r
m
o
n
t
,

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
,

C
A

9
0
0
3
7
G
r
a
d
e
s

5
-
8
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
S
p
a
n
:
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
:
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
X
R
1
2
1
5
8
K
I
P
P

E
m
p
o
w
e
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
K
-

1
1
0
4
9
9
1
B

9
4
6
0
8
0
1
2
0
8
5
0
0
0
0
4
X
R
7
2
2
5
3
A
s
p
i
r
e

S
l
a
u
s
o
n

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

6
2
0
8
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
N
o
7
8
3
7
5
7
3
5
9
2
8
0
3
5
2
5
8
8
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
X
R
7
2
2
5
4
A
s
p
i
r
e

J
u
a
n
i
t
a

T
a
t
e

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

6
2
1
5
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
N
o
7
5
2
7
4
8
2
5
9
6
1
0
0
4
0
3
0
8
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
7
2
2
5
5
A
s
p
i
r
e

I
n
s
k
e
e
p

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

6
2
3
8
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
N
o
7
7
6
7
7
3
3
6
9
6
1
2
0
4
0
2
7
8
7
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
2
2
5
9
A
p
p
l
e

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

P
u
b
l
i
c
K
-

5
2
0
6
7
0
8
B
8
8
7
0
1
0
1
6
3
9
0
5
9
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
2
9
2
5
C
e
l
e
r
i
t
y

N
a
s
c
e
n
t

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

8
3
4
1
Y
e
a
r

4
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
1
0
8
9
1
9
1
0
9
9
7
0
1
3
2
3
4
8
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
4
0
6
9
G
a
r
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

o
f

M
a
t
h

a
n
d

E
n
t
r
e
p
r
e
n
e
u
r
i
a
l
K
-

5
2
2
1
Y
e
a
r

2
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
0
3
7
7
9
4
8
7
0
1
0
7
1
2
2
9
0
8
7
0
0
0
1
3
X
R
5
5
1
8
7
K
I
P
P

S
c
h
o
l
a
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
5
-

5
1
0
0
7
7
7
B
8
8
2
6
4
1
9
5
3
9
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
X
R

5
2
0
2
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e

C
o
l
l
e
g
e
-
R
e
a
d
y

M
S

A
c
a
d

#
1
2
6
-

8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
R

5
2
0
6
G
l
o
b
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

M
i
d
d
l
e

S
c
h
o
o
l
6
-

8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
5
5
8
3
N
e
w

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

8
2
7
1
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
4
5
8
0
4
5
9
9
7
1
4
0
2
6
1
5
6
8
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
5
9
8
2
T
E
A
C
H

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

o
f

T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
5
-

7
2
5
3
N
o
N
o
7
3
1
7
3
2
2
9
9
6
1
1
0
3
0
1
7
5
5
1
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
2
7
0
2
9
S
y
n
e
r
g
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
K
-

5
2
0
2
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
0
7
9
3
5
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
3
1
6
3
2
3
4
9
5
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
2
7
6
7
2
U
S
C

H
y
b
r
i
d

H
i
g
h
9
-

9
1
2
5
6
8
8
B
7
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
2
6
6
4
2
5
2
1
0
0
3
X
R
1
7
6
7
3
A
c
a
d
e
m
y

o
f

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

a
n
d

E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
9
-

1
0
1
4
4
6
4
4
B
8
5
1
6
0
2
1
3
1
7
1
1
1
8
0
0
0
0
1
0
X
R
7
7
6
9
2
S
y
n
e
r
g
y

Q
u
a
n
t
u
m

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
9
-
1
1
4
5
3
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
3
1
6
6
3
2
3
9
2
9
1
1
2
3
5
7
9
4
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
8
4
5
1
L
o
u

D
a
n
t
z
l
e
r

P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
o
r
y

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

M
i
d
d
l
e
6
-

8
2
4
6
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
6
2
5
6
4
3
1
1
8
9
1
2
0
2
4
1
4
0
8
3
0
0
2
0
2
X
R
2
8
8
1
8
A
n
i
m
o

J
a
c
k
i
e

R
o
b
i
n
s
o
n

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
4
3
9
Y
e
a
r

1
N
o
N
o
7
5
3
7
7
5
6
1
0
9
8
9
0
2
6
6
5
9
8
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
1
8
8
2
4
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e

C
o
l
l
e
g
e
-
R
e
a
d
y

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

H
i
g
h

N
o
.
9
-
1
2
4
7
5
Y
e
a
r

3
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
9
8
7
6
5
6
1
0
8
6
8
0
1
6
4
9
8
5
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
2
X
R
1
8
8
2
5
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e

W
i
l
l
i
a
m

a
n
d

C
a
r
o
l

O
u
c
h
i

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
9
-
1
2
4
4
3
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
7
2
7
7
3
6
9
9
3
6
0
1
3
5
2
8
6
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
X
R
7
8
8
2
8
W
a
l
l
i
s

A
n
n
e
n
b
e
r
g

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
3
7
4
Y
e
a
r

3
5
5
7
1
4
0
1
3
4
0
6
2
0
5
1
0
4
0
2
8
W
1
5
1
1
1
D
r
.

T
h
e
o
.

T
.

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r

J
r
.
,

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

C
e
n
t
K
-

5
3
9
7
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
6
6
7
7
6
3
2
4
1
1
0
7
2
2
1
8
7
2
1
2
3
1
0
1
0
2
X
R
7
2
0
1
5
A
c
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
e
d
K
-

8
5
8
1
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
N
o
7
7
3
7
6
7
3
6
9
2
9
0
2
9
3
7
7
9
1
1
0
0
1
3
0
7
P
l
e
a
s
e

n
o
t
e
:

S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s

m
a
y

n
o
t

s
u
m

t
o

1
0
0

d
u
e

t
o

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s

o
f
:

o
t
h
e
r
,

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
,

o
r

n
o
n
-
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
w
a
s

n
o
t

o
p
e
n
e
d

in

2
0
1
1
-
1
2

o
r

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
.

#

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
d
id

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
lid

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

r
a
n
k
s
.
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
2

o
f

2
339
0123456789
kk
#
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
#
#
##
G
G
#
G
G
G
G
G
#
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
^
^
G G
G
G
G
G
#
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
####
G
G
GF
Crenshaw
VAPA Mag
Crenshaw
BET Mag
GAMES
View Pk
Prep
Cht MS
Academy of
Sci and
Engineering
Apple Acad
Chrtr
Public Sch
Global Educ
Acad MS
Accelerated
Chrtr
New Heights
Hawkins High
C/DAGS
Roberti
EEC
Hawkins
High CHAS
Hawkins
High RISE
KIPP Academy
of Opp
Academy of
Sci and
Engineering
Fine & Perf
Arts Acad \
Synergy
Quantum
Acad
Aspire-
Tate Acad
Alliance
College-Ready
Acad HS #17
KIPP Scholar
Acad
USC
Hybrid
High
Central
Cont High \
Douglass
Acad
TEACH
Academy of
Technologies
Crenshaw
Arts -
Tech HS
Accelerated
Elementary
Synergy
Chrtr
Animo
Jackie
Robinson
Dantzler
Prep Chrtr
Middle
Annenberg
High
Douglass
Academy
Middle
Douglass
Academy High
GAMES
New
Heights
Alliance
College-Ready
MS Acad #7
Crown
Prep
Acad
View Pk
Prep Acc HS
New
Designs
Chrtr
City of
Angels
Tri-C Comm
Day School
Aspire-
Inskeep
Acad
Aspire-
Slauson
Acad
Center for
Advanced
Lrng
Alliance
College-Ready
Acad HS #5
Dantzler
Prep Chrtr
Global
Education
Academy
Soc Justice
Sch Global
Issues Acad
Celerity
Dyad Chrtr
Celerity
Dyad
Chrtr
Celerity
Nascent
KIPP
Empower
Academy
LA Leadership
Academy
Alliance
College-Ready
MS Acad #12
Communication
and Tech School
Rivera LC
Green Design
School
Performing
Arts Comm
School
Public Service
Comm School
Alliance Ouchi-
O'Donovan
Chrtr High
View Pk
Prep Acc MS
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
1
0
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E

1
1
0
W JEFFERSON BLVD
S

B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S

G
R
A
N
D
A
V
S

M
A
I
N

S
T
W VERNON AV
S
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
A
V
S

V
E
R
M
O
N
T

A
V
E
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N
B
L
V
D
S
F
I
G
U
E
R
O
A
S
T
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD
W SLAUSON AV E SLAUSON AV
W
W
A
S
H
IN
G
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
W FLORENCE AV
E VERNON AV
S

W
E
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
EXPOSITION BLVD
S

S
A
N

P
E
D
R
O

S
T
E FLORENCE AV
RO
DEO
R
D
E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD
A
V
A
L
O
N
B
L
V
D
C
R
E
N
S
H
A
W

B
L
V
D
S

H
O
O
V
E
R

S
T
LOS
ANGELES
14th St
Admin
Office
M & O
Area S-1
Office
59th St
52nd St
42nd St
66th St
Weemes
74th St
6th Ave
Adams
Middle
Audubon
Middle
61st St
Wadsworth
Ave
San Pedro
St
Carver
Middle
Normandie
Ave
Norwood St
Menlo
Ave
King Jr.,
Martin
Luther
49th St
Orthopaedic
Med Mag HS
Mann
Middle
Harmony
Muir
Middle
28th St
Accelerated
Chrtr
Hooper
Ave PC
Manual Arts
High
Widney High
(Spec)
24th St
Los Angeles
Academy
Middle
68th St
Aurora
Bethune
Middle
Foshay
Learning Ctr
Santee
Ed Cmplx
Main St
Trinity St
Friedman
Occup Ctr
West Vernon
Ave
Western
Ave
Lanterman
High (Spec)
Angeles
Mesa
Hooper
EEC
32nd St Mag
36th St
EEC
Budlong
Ave
Vermont
Ave
Bright
Clinton
Middle
Maple
PC
Obama
Global
Prep Acad
Huerta
Hooper
Ave
Alexander
Sci Ctr
Crenshaw
STEMM Mag
South
Region
ES #10
Mack
Estrella
Wisdom
Mid-City
Prescott
Mag
Jones
PC
Bradley Glbl
Awr Mag
Angelou
Comm
High
Rivera
Lrng Complex
Campus
Jones
YES
Academy
Lizarraga
Ride
SMART
Acad
Hawkins
High
South
Region
ES #11

reproduced except as licensed by LAUSD and
Los Angeles County.
MPD-2729
5/8/2014
LAUSD Boundaries
LAUSD Boundary
West Educational Service Center Area WEST
Area of Interest
Public Policy Charter School
2 mi. Radius of
Public Policy Charter School
Public Policy
Charter School
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
Charter School G
# Elementary School
" Middle School
# High School
!(
Planned Early
Education Center
Planned Classroom
Addition _
Planned Playground
Expansion
[
^_
Planned School
Reconfiguration
#0
School
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Span School
Planned School
Closed School
Administrative Site
Charter School
Magnet School
340
0123456789
J UNE 10, 2014
Final budget
Final petition
(213) 241-0399
341
0123456789
TAB 25
Approval of the Charter for Renaissance Arts Academy K-12
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of the charter petition for Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 for five (5) years,
beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020, to serve 350 students in grades K-12 in year 1 and up to 600
students in grades K-12 by the end of its charter term.
Background:
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 submitted a charter petition application to the Charter Schools Division,
which included the number of signatures required under Education Code 47605(a). A Public Hearing was
held on May 13, 2014. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by the Charter Schools
Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District staff.
Staff affirms that Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 has met the requirements set forth in Education Code
47605, based on review and consideration of its charter school petition application.
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 is proposed to be located in Los Angeles, CA 90041. This area is served by
Educational Service Center East in Board District 5. The school will serve 350 students in grades K-12 in its
first year of operation and expand to serve 600 students in grades K-12 by 2020. Renaissance Arts Academy K
-12 has indicated that it intends to obtain a private site for its facility.
The vision of Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 is for its students to graduate with viable post-secondary
opportunities to succeed in college, career and community. Graduates will synthesize intellectual curiosity,
academic discernment, and artistic discipline in the creation of a rational, inclusive and hopeful future for all.
Through a rigorous and balanced curriculum, Renaissance Arts Academy K-12s mission is to cultivate
autonomous scholarship in an ensemble setting by providing an integrated classical curriculum focused on
music and performing arts disciplines. Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 will welcome students from all
backgrounds, developing 21
st
century Renaissance citizens through rigorous academic inquiry, collaborative
small-group instruction, and professionally guided arts training.
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 will implement its own English Learner Master Plan.
This proposed K-12 school would be the second charter school operated by Renaissance Arts Academy, a
nonprofit public benefit corporation, currently operates Renaissance Arts Academy (RenArts). RenArts serves
370 students in grades 6-12 (58% Latino, 25% White, 8% African American, 66% Students Eligible for Free
and Reduced Meals, 4% English Learners, 12% RFEPs, and 9% Students with Disabilities) in the same
geographic area. In 2013, RenArts was honored as a California Distinguished School, received the states
Exemplary Arts Program Award, and was recognized by the USC Center on Educational Governance as one of
the Top 10 Charter High Schools in California. The school earned a 2013 Growth API of 897, a 2012 State
Ranking of 9, and a 2012 Similar Schools Ranking of 8, and met its 2013 API Growth Targets schoolwide and
powered by Legistar
342
0123456789
for all numerically significant subgroups.
Although the District has not classified RenArts on the School Performance Framework (SPF) this past year, its
performance in the areas for which it has data is comparable to schools that are classified as Excelling, the
top tier of schools on the SPF. RenArts incorporates Integrated Math into their curriculum in lieu of Algebra
and therefore does not have the Algebra I metrics required to receive an SPF classification. RenArts offers an
accelerated and integrated math curriculum focusing on connections within mathematics and to other content
areas. Mathematics learning begins in the 6
th
and 7
th
grades and proceeds through Calculus, which more than
sufficiently prepares students to meet the rigors of Integrated Math in the eighth grade. Based on the SPF
metrics for which scores were available, the middle school portion of the school received 4 or 5 points (out of
5) in every SPF status metric except attendance (3 points). The high school portion of the school received 4 or
5 points in every SPF status metric for which it had sufficient data, including the maximum 5 points for its
100% 4-year cohort graduation rate and 97% 1
st
Time CAHSEE pass rate. Renaissance Arts Academy seeks to
replicate this successful school model and extend its benefits to students in the proposed Renaissance Arts
Academy K-12 charter school.
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 will make every effort to recruit a diverse student population. For example,
the demographics of Eagle Rock Elementary School, a District school within a two-mile radius of the proposed
charter school location, are 50% Latino, 19% Filipino, 17% White, 10% English Learners, and 55% Free and
Reduced Lunch (CDE). Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 indicates in its petition that the charter school will
recruit students of various racial and ethnic groups in the Los Angeles, CA 90041 area and beyond so as to
achieve a balance that is reflective of the general population residing within the territorial jurisdiction of
LAUSD. At its current 6-12 school RenArts serves a diverse population from 53 zip codes. The school will
maintain an accurate accounting of the ethnic and racial balance of students enrolled in the school. It will also
keep on file documentation of the efforts the school makes to achieve racial and ethnic balance.
Current members of the Renaissance Arts K-12 Board of Directors completed questionnaires regarding
conflicts of interest. A January 2013 due diligence review of the proposed Executive Director (on-site financial
manager) and Academic Director performed by the Office of the Inspector General revealed no material
negative findings. An update review is being performed by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Staff
will inform the Board of any material negative findings and take appropriate action.
If approved, the Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 charter will have a five-year term, beginning July 1, 2015
until June 30, 2020. As part of its oversight responsibility, the Charter Schools Division will perform ongoing
Expected Outcomes:
Renaissance Arts K-12 is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local, state, and
federal ordinances, laws and regulations, and the terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The measurable
pupil outcomes and method by which pupil progress toward outcomes will be measured are set forth in the
petition.
Yes - The approval of the charter petition for Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 would grant its Board of
Directors the right to operate the charter school under the terms of the approved charter for a five (5) year
powered by Legistar
343
0123456789
period, beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020.
No - The denial of the charter petition would result in the Board of Directors for Renaissance Arts Academy
K-12 being prohibited from opening the charter school, unless Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 appeals the
denial and the charter is granted by the Los Angeles County Board of Education or the California State Board
of Education. This Board Report 483 - 13/14 and accompanying documents shall constitute the Board of
Educations adopted written findings of fact for the denial of Renaissance Arts Academy K-12s petition.
Budget Impact:
Education Code 47604(c), a school district that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or as, a
nonprofit public benefit corporation is not held liable for the charter schools debts or obligations as long as the
school district complies with all oversight responsibilities. The District will continue to have monitoring and
oversight responsibility for charter school finances, as specified in the Charter Schools Act. Any modifications
to the charter schools petition or operations with significant financial implications would require District
approval prior to implementation. Petition approval is also contingent upon adequate liability insurance
coverage.
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 has selected LAUSD SELPA Option 2. Under the current LAUSD SELPA
Understanding (MOU). Should Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 not comply with this requirement, this Board
item will be withdrawn from the agenda.
Attachments:
Informative
powered by Legistar
344
0123456789
RENAISSANCE ARTS ACADEMY K-12
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 483 - 1311 4
June 10, 2014
The proposed action would initiate the charter for Renaissance Arts Academy K-12, beginning July 1, 2015
until June 30, 2020 to serve 350 students in grades K- I 2 in year I and up to 600 st udents in grades K- I 2 by the
end of its charter term.
I I. Summary Description of Current District Practice:
Charter schools are granted si ngle charter stat us for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted, however,
that although State legislati on allows students to attend a charter school from any area in the state, the Los
The approval of this charter petition would grant the charter of Renaissance Arts Academy K- I 2 for five (5)
IV. Effects of Thi s Proposal:
V. Analvze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation. Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
low academic achievement , low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opportunit ies, interracial
VI. If proposed action affects negativelv anv desegregation program, li st other option(s) identified:
If the Di strict Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
Di stri ct ' s Court-ordered Integration Program.
PREPARED BY:
JOYCE JOHNSON, PH.D.
Senior Coordinator
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 483 - 13114
MODESTA 1 B A S Y ~
Interim Director
Student Integrati on Services
Page 1 of 1 Board of Education
June 10,2014
345
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
346
0123456789
No. 483 13/14
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR PROPOSED RENAISSANCE ARTS ACADEMY
K-12
Attached please find supporting documentation for the proposed Renaissance Arts Academy K-12which
will be presented to the Board of Education for action on J une 10, 2014.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. ALDAMA
2. ANNANDALE
3. BUCHANAN ST.
4. DAHLIA HEIGHTS
5. DELEVAN DR.
6. EAGLE ROCK
7. GARVANZA
8. MERIDIAN EEC
9. MONTE VISTA ST.
10. RIORDAN PC
11. ROCKDALE
12. TOLAND WAY
13. YORKDALE
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. BURBANK MIDDLE 1. PUC CALS CHRTR MIDDLE
2. PUC SANTA ROSA CHRTR ACAD
HIGH SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. FRANKLIN HIGH
2. HIGHLAND PARK CONT HIGH
1. PUC CALS EARLY COLLEGE HIGH
347
0123456789
SPAN SCHOOLS
LAUSD CHARTER
1. EAGLE ROCK HIGH 1. CELERITY TROIKA (COLORADO BLVD)
2. CELERITY TROIKA (FIGUEROA ST)
3. RENAISSANCE ARTS ACADEMY (6-12)
ADULT SCHOOLS
None
None
1. Renaissance Arts Academy
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
348
0123456789
BRIEFINGPAGE
J UNE 10, 2014
The Charter Schools Division recommends Board of Education approval of Renaissance Arts Academy K-12based
onthe findings from the Divisions rigorous and comprehensive charter review process for elements 1-16. These
elements were reviewed by the Superintendents Advisory Committee and the Office of the General Counsel.
Based on the criteria set forth in Education Code 47605 for charter school authorization, and upon completionof
the Charter Schools Divisions process, including review of all elements (1-16), the final decision will be determined
on the following:
Lead Petitioner Applying for Charter: PK Candaux
Grades Served: K-12
Instructional Focus: Renaissance Arts Academy K-12s instructional focus is on utilizing the physical,
intellectual, and aesthetic disciplines of music and movement to furnish multiple points of entry into core
academic content and to create alternate gateways to understanding and communication for all students. The
program will provide high-level performing arts training for students at every level of development, bringing
together a cross-section of L.A.s diverse ethnic, economic and cultural populations in a focused community
designed to provide intellectual challenge and encourage disciplined development of creative skills. Through
collaborative examination of seminal sources of the Western intellectual and artistic traditions, students will gain
a sense of ownership and agency that further informs their analyses and expressions of their own cultural
backgrounds and experiences.
Number of Students: Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 expects to enroll 350 K-12 students in the first year.
When fully enrolled, it estimates servingapproximately 600 students in grades K-12.
Location Address or Target Neighborhood: Los Angeles, CA 90041.
Facility Status/Location: Facility to be determined.
349
0123456789
ESC BD
Loc.
Code School
Grade
Span
2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
E 5 2027 Aldama Elementary K- 6 448 Year 3 Yes No 772 760 3 3 46 12 12 40 24 92 3 0 2 2 1 0 1
E 5 2151 Annandale Elementary K- 6 222 Year 2 Yes No 804 814 5 7 53 9 18 16 16 92 2 3 0 1 1 1 0
XP 5 8643 Benjamin Franklin Senior High 9-12 1241 Year 5 Yes Yes 713 692 3 5 65 12 16 16 46 90 1 1 3 4 1 0 0
E 5 2603 Buchanan Street Elementary K- 6 374 Year 3 No No 757 781 4 3 49 18 13 22 17 87 3 1 2 5 1 0 0
XR 2 8565 CA Academy for Liberal Studies Early Col 9-12 162 Yes No 794 787 7 8 88 9 3 9 46 97 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
XR 5 8154 California Academy for Liberal Studies 6- 8 311 Year 1 Yes Yes 851 858 8 10 82 12 2 6 30 90 3 1 1 2 3 0 0
XR 5 2118 Celerity Troika Charter K- 8 300 Yes Yes 947 966 10 10 76 6 0 8 26 74 3 4 2 15 0 1 1
E 5 3329 Dahlia Heights Elementary K- 6 283 Yes No 848 859 7 5 50 14 25 8 7 59 18 0 6 14 2 0 1
E 5 3397 Delevan Drive Elementary K- 6 335 Yes Yes 915 900 9 8 61 7 29 8 13 53 9 3 5 30 0 0 0
E 5 3507 Eagle Rock Elementary K- 6 671 Year 3 Yes Yes 887 875 8 6 55 14 35 10 14 50 17 2 11 19 1 0 1
E 5 8614 Eagle Rock High 7-12 2130 Year 5 No No 776 773 6 2 64 11 33 7 25 59 10 2 7 22 1 1 0
E 5 4082 Garvanza Elementary K- 6 317 Year 2 Yes No 802 835 6 10 49 7 16 21 34 90 1 2 3 3 0 0 1
XS 5 8645 Highland Park Continuation 9-12 72 Yes Yes 592 573 B B 44 10 6 21 35 92 6 0 1 1 0 0 0
E 5 8066 Luther Burbank Middle 7- 8 873 Year 5 No No 786 792 5 8 77 11 19 12 40 91 1 2 2 3 1 0 0
E 5 5384 Monte Vista Street Elementary 2- 6 502 Year 3 No No 748 752 2 4 65 15 12 36 30 96 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
XR 5 8456 Renaissance Arts Academy 6-12 325 Yes Yes 897 906 9 8 66 9 25 4 12 58 25 8 3 4 1 0 2
E 5 6329 Rockdale Elementary K- 6 194 Year 3 Yes Yes 831 849 7 8 70 18 12 14 7 71 8 2 5 11 2 0 1
XR 5 7778 Santa Rosa Charter Academy 6- 8 209 Year 1 Yes No 787 761 4 3 86 16 11 8 40 89 6 1 0 3 0 0 0
E 5 7178 Toland Way Elementary K- 6 234 Year 4 No No 790 801 5 5 47 12 11 12 24 76 3 2 5 14 0 0 0
E 5 7959 Yorkdale Elementary K- 6 250 Year 2 No No 798 813 5 9 82 15 10 20 25 90 2 0 1 4 0 2 0
Background/Context about the Petitioner: Renaissance Arts Academy, a nonprofit public benefit corporation,
currently operates the award-winning Renaissance Arts Academy (RenArts), which serves 370 students in grades 6-
12, in the same geographic area. In 2013, RenArts was honored as a California Distinguished School, received the
states Exemplary Arts Program Award, and was recognized by the USC Center on Educational Governance as one of
the Top 10 Charter High Schools in California.
Board of Directors:
J ill Bowman
Frank Gonzalez
J ane Hancock
Anne Lee
Kathleen Murphy
J ohn Steinmetz
Nathaniel Zeisler
Description of Mission: The mission of Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 is to cultivate autonomous scholarship in
an ensemble setting by providing an integrated classical curriculum focused on music and performing arts disciplines.
The school welcomes students from all backgrounds and aims to develop 21
st
century Renaissance citizens through
rigorous academic inquiry, collaborative small-group instruction, and professionally guided arts training.
Description of Vision: Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 students will graduate fromhigh school with viable post-
secondary opportunities to succeed in college, career and community. Graduates will synthesize intellectual curiosity,
academic discernment, and artistic discipline in the creation of a rational, inclusive and hopeful future for all.
Source of Core Money: Renaissance Arts Academy K-12 will receive funding fromapportionment.
3-5 Top Leaders: PK Candaux, Sidnie Gallegos Myrick.
Other charter schools currently operated by the Petitioner: Renaissance Arts Academy.
Innovative elements of the charter that could be considered best practices and replicated by other schools:
Integration of performing arts discipline with accelerated academic inquiry for students at all levels of development.
350
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

W
I
T
H
I
N

A

2
-
M
I
L
E

R
A
D
I
U
S
R
e
n
a
i
s
s
a
n
c
e

A
r
t
s

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

K
-
1
2
1
8
0
0

C
o
l
o
r
a
d
o

B
l
v
d
.
,

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
,

C
A

9
0
0
4
1
G
r
a
d
e
s

K
-
1
2
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
E
5
2
0
2
7
A
l
d
a
m
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
4
4
8
Y
e
a
r

3
Y
e
s
N
o
7
7
2
7
6
0
3
3
4
6
1
2
1
2
4
0
2
4
9
2
3
0
2
2
1
0
1
E
5
2
1
5
1
A
n
n
a
n
d
a
l
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
2
2
2
Y
e
a
r

2
Y
e
s
N
o
8
0
4
8
1
4
5
7
5
3
9
1
8
1
6
1
6
9
2
2
3
0
1
1
1
0
X
P
5
8
6
4
3
B
e
n
j
a
m
i
n

F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n

S
e
n
i
o
r

H
i
g
h
9
-
1
2
1
2
4
1
Y
e
a
r

5
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
7
1
3
6
9
2
3
5
6
5
1
2
1
6
1
6
4
6
9
0
1
1
3
4
1
0
0
E
5
2
6
0
3
B
u
c
h
a
n
a
n

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
3
7
4
Y
e
a
r

3
N
o
N
o
7
5
7
7
8
1
4
3
4
9
1
8
1
3
2
2
1
7
8
7
3
1
2
5
1
0
0
X
R
2
8
5
6
5
C
A

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

f
o
r

L
i
b
e
r
a
l

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

E
a
r
l
y

C
o
l
9
-
1
2
1
6
2

Y
e
s
N
o
7
9
4
7
8
7
7
8
8
8
9
3
9
4
6
9
7
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
X
R
5
8
1
5
4
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a

A
c
a
d
e
m
y

f
o
r

L
i
b
e
r
a
l

S
t
u
d
i
e
s
6
-

8
3
1
1
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
5
1
8
5
8
8
1
0
8
2
1
2
2
6
3
0
9
0
3
1
1
2
3
0
0
X
R
5
2
1
1
8
C
e
l
e
r
i
t
y

T
r
o
i
k
a

C
h
a
r
t
e
r
K
-

8
3
0
0

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
7
9
6
6
1
0
1
0
7
6
6
0
8
2
6
7
4
3
4
2
1
5
0
1
1
E
5
3
3
2
9
D
a
h
l
i
a

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
2
8
3

Y
e
s
N
o
8
4
8
8
5
9
7
5
5
0
1
4
2
5
8
7
5
9
1
8
0
6
1
4
2
0
1
E
5
3
3
9
7
D
e
l
e
v
a
n

D
r
i
v
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
3
3
5

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
1
5
9
0
0
9
8
6
1
7
2
9
8
1
3
5
3
9
3
5
3
0
0
0
0
E
5
3
5
0
7
E
a
g
l
e

R
o
c
k

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
6
7
1
Y
e
a
r

3
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
8
7
8
7
5
8
6
5
5
1
4
3
5
1
0
1
4
5
0
1
7
2
1
1
1
9
1
0
1
E
5
8
6
1
4
E
a
g
l
e

R
o
c
k

H
i
g
h
7
-
1
2
2
1
3
0
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
7
6
7
7
3
6
2
6
4
1
1
3
3
7
2
5
5
9
1
0
2
7
2
2
1
1
0
E
5
4
0
8
2
G
a
r
v
a
n
z
a

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
3
1
7
Y
e
a
r

2
Y
e
s
N
o
8
0
2
8
3
5
6
1
0
4
9
7
1
6
2
1
3
4
9
0
1
2
3
3
0
0
1
X
S
5
8
6
4
5
H
i
g
h
l
a
n
d

P
a
r
k

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
9
-
1
2
7
2

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
5
9
2
5
7
3
B
B
4
4
1
0
6
2
1
3
5
9
2
6
0
1
1
0
0
0
E
5
8
0
6
6
L
u
t
h
e
r

B
u
r
b
a
n
k

M
i
d
d
l
e
7
-

8
8
7
3
Y
e
a
r

5
N
o
N
o
7
8
6
7
9
2
5
8
7
7
1
1
1
9
1
2
4
0
9
1
1
2
2
3
1
0
0
E
5
5
3
8
4
M
o
n
t
e

V
i
s
t
a

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
-

6
5
0
2
Y
e
a
r

3
N
o
N
o
7
4
8
7
5
2
2
4
6
5
1
5
1
2
3
6
3
0
9
6
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
X
R
5
8
4
5
6
R
e
n
a
i
s
s
a
n
c
e

A
r
t
s

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
-
1
2
3
2
5

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
9
7
9
0
6
9
8
6
6
9
2
5
4
1
2
5
8
2
5
8
3
4
1
0
2
E
5
6
3
2
9
R
o
c
k
d
a
l
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
1
9
4
Y
e
a
r

3
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
3
1
8
4
9
7
8
7
0
1
8
1
2
1
4
7
7
1
8
2
5
1
1
2
0
1
X
R
5
7
7
7
8
S
a
n
t
a

R
o
s
a

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
-

8
2
0
9
Y
e
a
r

1
Y
e
s
N
o
7
8
7
7
6
1
4
3
8
6
1
6
1
1
8
4
0
8
9
6
1
0
3
0
0
0
E
5
7
1
7
8
T
o
l
a
n
d

W
a
y

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
2
3
4
Y
e
a
r

4
N
o
N
o
7
9
0
8
0
1
5
5
4
7
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
4
7
6
3
2
5
1
4
0
0
0
E
5
7
9
5
9
Y
o
r
k
d
a
l
e

E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
-

6
2
5
0
Y
e
a
r

2
N
o
N
o
7
9
8
8
1
3
5
9
8
2
1
5
1
0
2
0
2
5
9
0
2
0
1
4
0
2
0
P
l
e
a
s
e

n
o
t
e
:

S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s

m
a
y

n
o
t

s
u
m

t
o

1
0
0

d
u
e

t
o

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s

o
f
:

o
t
h
e
r
,

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
,

o
r

n
o
n
-
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
S
p
a
n
:
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
:
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
w
a
s

n
o
t

o
p
e
n
e
d

in

2
0
1
1
-
1
2

o
r

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
.

#

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
d
id

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
lid

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

r
a
n
k
s
.
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
1

o
f

2
351
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

O
P
E
R
A
T
E
D

B
Y

T
H
E

S
A
M
E

P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
O
t
h
e
r

R
e
n
a
i
s
s
a
n
c
e

S
c
h
o
o
l
s
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.

C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e

S
p
a
n

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
X
R
5
8
4
5
6
R
e
n
a
i
s
s
a
n
c
e

A
r
t
s

A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
-
1
2
3
2
5

Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
9
7
9
0
6
9
8
6
6
9
2
5
4
1
2
5
8
2
5
8
3
4
1
0
2
S
c
h
o
o
l

D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
is

n
e
w

o
r

a

p
r
im
a
r
y

c
e
n
t
e
r
.
5
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4
2

o
f

2
352
0123456789
G
#
$
G
G
G
G
G
GG
GF
Renaissance
Arts Acad
Highland
Park Cont
High
Transportation
Branch Office
Celerity
Octavia
Los Feliz
Schools for
the Arts
Celerity
Troika
Chrtr
PUC Santa
Rosa Chrtr
Acad
PUC CALS
Chrtr
Middle
PUC CALS
Early
College High
Celerity
Troika
Chrtr
VENTURA FRWY
P
A
S
A
D
E
N
A FRW
Y
N
F
I
G
U
E
R
O
A
S
T
E BROADWAY
M
O
N
TER
EY
RD
G
L
E
N
D
A
L
E
F
R
W
Y
E COLORADO ST
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
B
L
V
D
PASADENA AV
S
V
E
R
D
U
G
O
R
D
S

C
H
E
V
Y

C
H
A
S
E

D
R
L
A
LO
M
A
RD
N
A
V
E

5
4
N
V
E
R
D
U
G
O
R
D
N
C
H
E
V
Y
C
H
A
S
E
D
R
E
C
H
E
V
Y
C
H
A
S
E
D
R
N
S
A
N
F
E
R
N
A
N
D
O
R
D
COLORADO BLVD
V
E
R
D
U
G
O

R
D
N
G
L
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
YORK BLVD
LOS
ANGELES
GLENDALE
PASADENA
SOUTH
PASADENA
Dahlia
Heights
Toland
Way
Eagle Rock
High
Yorkdale
San Pascual
Ave
Rockdale
Meridian
EEC
Delevan
Dr
Eagle
Rock
Franklin
High
Aldama
Annandale
Fletcher
Dr
Buchanan
St
Monte Vista
St
Garvanza
Burbank
Middle
Riordan PC

reproduced except as licensed by LAUSD, Digital Map Products, and
Thomas Bros. Maps.
MPD-2714
4/14/2014
LAUSD Boundaries
LAUSD Boundary
East Educational Service Center Area EAST
Area of Interest
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12
2 mi. Radius of
Renaissance Arts Academy K-12
Renaissance Arts
Academy K-12
Charter School G
# Elementary School
" Middle School
# High School
!(
Planned Early
Education Center
Planned Classroom
Addition _
Planned Playground
Expansion
[
^_
Planned School
Reconfiguration
#0
School
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Span School
Planned School
Closed School
Administrative Site
Charter School
Magnet School
353
0123456789
J UNE 10, 2014
Final budget
Final petition
(213) 241-0399
354
0123456789
TAB 26
Revocation Hearing of Urban Village Middle School: Adoption of the Facts in Support of Revocation
and Issuance of Final Decision to Revoke the Charter Pursuant to Education Code 47607(e) [Public
Hearing]
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends that, upon Board consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of
Education adopt the Facts in Support of Revocation for Urban Village Middle School and issue the Final
Decision to Revoke the Charter pursuant to California Education Code 47607(e). Staff also recommends that
the Charter Schools Division (CSD) be authorized to send and receive any documents related to the Facts in
Support of Revocation and Final Decision to Revoke the Charter.
Background:
Urban Village Middle School (Urban Village) was approved by the Board of Education on February 12,
2013. The school opened in August 2013 and currently serves 81 students (79% African American and 21%
Latino) in grades 6-8 on a private site located at 5753 Rodeo Road, Los Angeles, CA 90016 in Board District 1
and Educational Service Center West.
Pursuant to California Education Code 47607(c)(1), the authorizing entity may revoke the charter of a charter
school if it finds, through a showing of substantial evidence, that the charter school did any of the following:
(a) Committed a material violation of any of the conditions, standards, or
procedures set forth in the charter.
(b) Failed to meet or pursue any of the pupil outcomes identified in the
charter.
(c) Failed to meet generally accepted accounting principles, or engaged in
fiscal mismanagement.
(d) Violated any provision of the law.
Education Code 47607(d) requires the authorizing entity to notify the charter school of any violation and give
the charter school a reasonable opportunity to remedy the violation prior to revocation.
Education Code 47607(e) provides: Before revoking a charter for failure to remedy a violation pursuant to
subdivision (d), and after expiration of the schools reasonable opportunity to remedy without successfully
remedying the violation, the chartering authority shall provide a written notice of intent to revoke and notice of
facts in support of revocation to the charter school. No later than 30 days after providing the notice of intent to
revoke a charter, the chartering authority shall hold a public hearing, in the normal course of business, on the
issue of whether evidence exists to revoke the charter. No later than 30 days after the public hearing, the
chartering authority shall issue a final decision to revoke or decline to revoke the charter, unless the chartering
authority and the charter school agree to extend the issuance of the decision by an additional 30 days. The
powered by Legistar
355
0123456789
authority and the charter school agree to extend the issuance of the decision by an additional 30 days. The
chartering authority shall not revoke a charter, unless it makes written factual findings supported by substantial
evidence, specific to the charter school, that support its findings.
At a public hearing held on April 8, 2014, the Board of Education authorized the District to issue a Notice of
Violations to Urban Village Middle School, providing the school with a reasonable opportunity to remedy the
violations by April 30, 2014. The District received Urban Villages response to the Districts Notice of
Violations on April 30, 2014, which included Urban Villages statements regarding remedies to the violations.
District staff carefully and thoroughly reviewed Urban Villages April 30, 2014 response to the Notice of
Violations. As set forth in the attached Facts in Support of Revocation documenting the entire revocation
process and evidence, although the school provided or attempted to provide some remedies, the school has
failed to refute or remedy all of the violations and continues to fail to comply with legal obligations and its
charter. The school and its Governing Board have demonstrated a lack of capacity to operate the school
effectively and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and the terms of the schools charter.
At a public hearing held on May 13, 2014, the Board of Education approved the issuance of the Notice of Intent
to Revoke and Notice of Facts in Support of Revocation. There were no representatives or speakers on behalf
of Urban Village at the hearing. The Notice of Intent to Revoke and Notice of Facts in Support of Revocation
set forth the grounds for revocation:
(1) Violations of Provisions of Law (EC 47607(c)(1)(D))
(2) Material Violation of any Conditions, Standards, or Procedures set forth in the Charter (EC
47607(c)(1)(A))
(3) Fiscal Mismanagement (EC 47607(c)(1)(C))
The Board of Education is required to consider increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils
served at the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to revoke a charter. (Ed. Code
47607(c)(2).) Urban Village is in its first year of operation and does not have CST or other state standardized
testing data available for consideration. Urban Village has failed, however, to meet several key legal
obligations directly related to its academic program and student achievement, including but not limited to its
failure to administer the CELDT for its English Learners during the fall testing window, failure to assign
appropriately credentialed teachers to core courses, and failure to provide special education services and
supports for its students with disabilities as provided in the students IEPs.
The attached Facts in Support of Revocation and attachments contain the substantial evidence necessary to
support revocation of Urban Village Middle School. All supporting documentation and correspondence
submitted by both the District and Urban Village are included therein.
Staff shall submit to the Board any further documentation or evidence received from or related to Urban
Village Middle School for the Boards consideration.
Expected Outcomes:
If the Board finds substantial evidence exists to revoke the charter and adopts the Facts in Support of
Revocation, the Board will approve the issuance of the Final Decision to Revoke. Urban Village Middle
Schools charter will thereafter be revoked. Urban Village Middle School may appeal the revocation to the Los
Angeles County Board of Education (LACBOE) within 30 days of receipt of the Final Decision to Revoke the
powered by Legistar
356
0123456789
Angeles County Board of Education (LACBOE) within 30 days of receipt of the Final Decision to Revoke the
charter. If LACBOE does not issue a decision within 90 days of the appeal or upholds the authorizing entitys
revocation, Urban Village Middle School may appeal the revocation to the State Board of Education. Should
the Board revoke the charter of Urban Village based on violations of law and fiscal mismanagement, Urban
Village will not continue to qualify as a charter school for funding and for all other purposes during the
pendency of an appeal. (Ed. Code, section 47607(i))
Yes - The Board of Education adopts the Facts in Support of Revocation and approves the issuance of the
Final Decision to Revoke Urban Village Middle School. Board directs Charter Schools Division staff to issue
the Final Decision to Revoke and Facts in Support of Revocation to Urban Village Middle School.
No - Facts in Support of Revocation and Final Decision to Revoke will not be approved or issued. The formal
revocation process for Urban Village Middle School will be terminated and the school may continue to operate
as a charter school under the terms and conditions set forth in its approved charter.
Budget Impact:
The budget impact will be dependent on the resolution of revocation proceedings.
Find attached Facts in Support of Revocation and attachments which contain substantial evidence to revoke the
charter of Urban Village Middle School and Final Decision to Revoke the Charter.
Attachments:
Facts in Support of Revocation with attachments and Final Decision to Revoke the Urban Village Middle
School Charter
Informatives:
Not applicable.
powered by Legistar
357
0123456789
FACTS IN SUPPORT OF REVOCATION WITH
ATTACHMENTS AND FINAL DECISION TO
REVOKEDOCUMENTS WILL BE
SUBMITTED BY THE SUPPLEMENTAL
DEADLINE.
DOCUMENTS ARE CURRENTLY BEING
PROCESSED BY OFFICE OF GENERAL
COUNSEL.
358
0123456789
TAB 27
Report of cash disbursements
Request to reissue expired warrant
Donations of money
Action Proposed:
1. Report of cash disbursements: The Controller reports having disbursed the following payments of
approved demands, and recommends that the Board approve the disbursements against funds of the District.
A Warrants dated March 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014.
Warrant Numbers
1048430-1053582 1053585
-1069904
1069922-1069923
Net total of A Warrants issued: $ 21,037,041.05
Net total of direct deposit payroll
(Automated Clearing House - ACH) issued: $199,343,369.44
Total net amount of payroll disbursements: $220,380,410.49
B Warrants dated March 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014.
Warrant Numbers:
21167564-21167739 21206846-21207212
21170203-21170525 21209352-21209617
21175904-21176049 21215576-21215775
21179266-21179474 21221691-21221879
21182424-21182769 21227403-21227601
21186593-21186793 21229710-21229923
21189224-21189317 21233034-21233413
21191664-21192099 21236827-21237060
21196850-21197076 21244398-21244649
21204784-21204790 21249885-21250239
Net total of B Warrants issued: $ 86,337,733.89
Net total of ACH payments issued: $171,514,662.66
Total net of disbursements: $257,852,396.55
Total Amount of Report: $478,232,807.04
powered by Legistar
359
0123456789
The above disbursements are within approved budgeted appropriations or were made in accordance with
established Board policies.
2. Request to reissue an expired warrant that was not cashed within six months of being issued: The following
warrant has been submitted to the controller with a request to have it reissued amounting to $61.42.
Warrant Number Date Payee Amount
8100002 April 18, 2008 D Titley $61.42
3. Donation of Money: It is recommended that the donations be accepted; that appreciation be expressed to the
donors for their contributions; the funds in the amount shown be deposited; and the Controller be authorized
to draw checks for the purposes shown below:
Date: 04/22/2014
Donor: Janis E. Lake
Donation: $49,334.00
For use at: Columbus Middle School
Purpose: To provide funding for an Office Technician salary for the
2014-15 school year.
Date: 04/28/2014
Donor: Mount Washington Elementary Parent Teacher
Association
For use at: Mount Washington Elementary School
Purpose: To provide funding for 5 3-hour teacher assistant salaries
for the 2014-15 school year.
Date: 05/05/2014
Donor: Fox Group
For use at: Nava Learning Academy - School of Arts and Culture
Purpose: To provide funding for computers and contract services
for arts workshops.
Date: 05/06/2014
Donor: Justice Street School Parent Teacher Association
For use at: Justice Street Academy Charter School
Purpose: To provide funding for a 3-hour teacher assistant and 3 3-
hour instructional aide salaries for the 2014-15 school
year.
Background:
This is a recurring monthly board report for the board to approve various financial transactions that occur as
part of school business.
Expected Outcomes:
powered by Legistar
360
0123456789
The Board will be approving routine District financial transactions.
A yes vote:
1. Approves the previously disbursed payments;
2. Approves the reissuance of expired warrants requested to be reissued by the recipients; and
3. Accepts the donations of money.
A no vote could cause the cancellation of previously issued payments, decline to reissue warrants which
expired because they were over six months old, and decline cash donations made to the District.
This board report does not change any school policy.
Budget Impact:
This board report approves financial transactions but does not change the budget.
The Board will be approving routine District financial transactions.
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
361
0123456789
TAB 28
CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURES FOR ALL ORDERS (DRAWN ON THE FUNDS OF THE LOS
ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNING BOARD)
Action Proposed:
For the 2014-2015 Fiscal Year, staff seeks the following authorizations:
1) Megan K. Reilly, Chief Financial Officer, be allowed to sign, in the name of the Governing Board, all
orders (warrants) drawn on the funds of the Los Angeles Unified School District and V. Luis Buendia,
Controller, be allowed to sign such orders in the event the Chief Financial Officer is unavailable or
unable to do so;
2) Mark S. Harris, Deputy Controller, Marilyn Guerrero, Director of Accounts Payable, and Beatriz Rios,
Head Accountant for the Accounts Payable Branch, be allowed to approve payment vouchers, which is
the authority to pay vendor invoices; and
3) Obtain and submit the official Certification of Signatures for each Board member (including any new
member of the Board elected subsequent to this report) to the Los Angeles County Office of Education
(LACOE) as required under section 42633 of the Education Code.
Background:
Section 42632 of the California Education Code requires that all orders (warrants) made on behalf of the
District either be signed by a majority of the Board or by an official or employee of the District who has
received authorization to do so. LACOE similarly requires authorization for those officers and employees who
will be approving vendor payments. This action identifies the officers and employees in the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer who are authorized to sign orders for warrants and payments in Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
In addition, section 42633 of the California Education Code requires that the official Certification of Signatures
for each Board member be submitted to the County Superintendent of Schools. This Board action will allow
staff to obtain and submit the official Certification of Signature for each Board member (including any new
member of the Board elected subsequent to this report) for Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
Expected Outcomes:
The attached Certification of Signatures, along with the designation of Accounts Payable voucher approvers
listed above, will be submitted to the County Superintendent of Schools in accordance with California
Education Code Sections 42632 and 42633 and LAOCE requirements.
This action enables the officers and employees herein identified to sign orders for warrants and payments in
powered by Legistar
362
0123456789
Fiscal Year 2014-2015. Without this authorization or alternative designation, a majority of the Board will be
required to sign all warrants and orders.
There is no change to District policy.
Budget Impact:
None
Board approval of signatories is required by California Education Code Sections 35143, 42632 and 42633.
In addition, the County Superintendent of Schools requires Board authorization for Accounts Payable voucher
approvers. The payment voucher approvers currently on file with the County Superintendent of Schools are
Mark S. Harris, Deputy Controller, Marilyn Guerrero, Director of Accounts Payable and Beatriz Rios, Head
Accountant for the Accounts Payable Branch.
Attachments:
Certification of Signatures (Official Form).
Informatives:
Informative: Certification of Signatures on District Orders
powered by Legistar
363
0123456789
K-12 Districts:
Community College Districts:
governing board.
Clerk/Secretary of the Board
NOTE: Please TYPE name under signature
Column 1 Column 2
Signature of Personnel and/or Members of Governing
Board authorized to sign Orders for Salary or Commerical
Payments, Notices of Employment, and Contracts:
Signature of Members of the Governing Board
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
TYPED NAME TYPED NAME
Richard Vladovic Megan K. Reilly
President of the Board of Education
TITLE Chief Financial Officer
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Steven Zimmer V. Luis Buendia
Vice President of the Board of Education
TITLE Controller
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
J efferson Crain
Clerk/Secretary of the Board of Education TITLE
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Tamar Galatzan
Member of the Board of Education TITLE
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Mnica Garcia
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Bennett Kayser
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Mnica Ratliff
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Vacant
If the Board has given special insturctions for signing
warrants or orders, pleaseattach copy of the resolution
to this form.
If the persons authorized to sign orders as shown in Column 2 are unable to do so, the law requires the signatures of the majority of the governing board.
Theseapproved signatures are valid for the period of J uly 1, 2014 to J une 30, 2015
Amended in accordance with governing board approval dated J une 10, 2014
Signature _______________________________________
SCHOOL DISTRICT
CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURES
As clerk/secretary to the governing board of the above named school district, I certify that the signatures shown below in Column 1 are the verified
signatures of the members of the governing board. I certify that the signatures as shown in Column 2 are the verified signatures of the person or persons
authorized to sign notices of employment, contracts and orders drawn on the funds of the school district. Thesecertifications are made in accordance with
the provisions of the Education Code Sections:
35143, 42632 and 42633
72000, 85232 and 85233
364
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
365
0123456789
366
0123456789
TAB 29
Authorization to Make Interfund Transfers and Temporary Borrowings
Action Proposed:
Authorize the Chief Financial Officer or the Controller to make interfund transfers or temporary borrowings
among the Districts various funds in accordance with the 2014-15 adopted and modified District budgets and
Education Code section 42603.
Background:
This requested action continues accounting procedures currently in place with respect to interfund transfers and
temporary borrowings. Interfund transfers are made between funds for various purposes, including transfers for
debt service requirements.
Temporary borrowings are made in situations wherein the District advances cash from a fund with available
cash to pay obligations from a fund with insufficient cash balance. Repayments of the cash advance are made
within statutory timelines.
Approval of the resolution will assure that temporary borrowing or interfund transfer is authorized beginning in
July 2014.
Expected Outcomes:
District staff will be able to make required interfund transfers or temporary borrowings in the 2014-15 fiscal
year.
Without prior approval, District staff will not have the authority to make interfund transfers or temporary
borrowings in 2014-15 fiscal year.
This Board Report does not change any District policy.
Budget Impact:
There are no budget implications to this proposed action.
These actions are considered part of the Districts standard financial operations.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Schedule of Interfund Transfers
Attachment B: Schedule of Temporary Borrowings
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
367
0123456789
Interfund Transfer and Temporary Borrowing Between Funds
powered by Legistar
368
0123456789
FROM: TO: PURPOSE: 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14*

General Fund Child Development Fund Support $ 7,996 $ 19,437 $ 15,322 20,000
General Fund Special Reserve Fund Debt Service 903 -
General Fund Health and Welfare Medicare Part D subsidy 10,956 9,756 10,396 $ 6,848
General Fund Health and Welfare Early Retirement Reinsurance Program - 1,370
General Fund Adult Education Fund Apportionment 60,481
General Fund Cafeteria Fund Repayment per MOU dated 3/18/2011 32,000 88,588 38,583 -
General Fund Cafeteria Fund Support 15,000 40,000
General Fund Cafeteria Fund Reimbursement of expenditures 61 -
General Fund Capital Services Fund Debt service 23,849 33,670 30,263 31,953
General Fund District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures - - 984
Deferred Maintenance Fund General Fund Tier III flexibility transfer 18,501 -
Special Reserve Fund Capital Services Fund Debt service 8,579 -
Special Reserve Fund General Fund Funding for capital expenditures - 2,436 140 1,701
Special Reserve Fund General Fund Funding for IFS Replacement COPs 49,704 -
Special Reserve Fund General Fund Funding for 80 Buses COPs 357
Special Reserve Fund General Fund Funding for RIF Project COPs 2,100
Special Reserve Fund General Fund Debt service - 15,200
Special Reserve Fund District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 378 117 17,088
Special Reserve Fund State Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures - - 1,577
Special Reserve Fund State School Building Lease-
Purchase Fund
Reimbursement of capital expenditures 5,427 - 1
Special Reserve Fund Capital Facilities Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures - - 11
Special Reserve Fund Adult Education Fund Funding for capital expenditures 27
Special Reserve Fund-CRA General Fund CRA transfer 4,002 -
Capital Facilities Fund Capital Services Fund Debt service 10,695 9,574 9,574 8,613
Capital Facilities Fund Special Reserve Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures - 1 22
Capital Facilities Fund District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 109 357 758
Capital Facilities Fund State Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 1
Adult Education Fund General Fund Flexibility transfer - - 10,431
Adult Education Fund Special Reserve Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 971
Cafeteria Fund Capital Services Fund Debt Service 786 787 787 787
Capital Services General Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 737 99
Capital Services District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures - 5,744
State Bond Funds Special Reserve Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures - - 764
State Bond Funds District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 357,562 186,521 171,001
State Bond Funds State Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 3,354 9,193 73,455
State Bond Funds Capital Facilities Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 220 - 9,536
State Bond Funds State School Building Lease-
Purchase Fund
Reimbursement of capital expenditures 135 149 59
State Bond Funds Deferred Maintenance Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 349 -
District Bond Funds District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 40,983 481,195 67,537
District Bond Funds State Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 18,173 28,286 35,120
District Bond Funds Adult Education Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures - - 44
District Bond Funds State School Building Lease-
Purchase Fund
Reimbursement of capital expenditures 1,058 43 89
District Bond Funds General Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 13,474 2,321 12,907 3,055
District Bond Funds Special Reserve Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 116 7,882 1,194
District Bond Funds Cafeteria Fund Reimbursement of capital expenditures 867 856 1,082 683
Building Fd - Measure Y General Fund Funding for capital expenditures - 1,672
Building Fd - Measure Y Capital Services Fund Debt Service 2,446 2,347 542 2,390
State School Building- Lease
Purchase
District Bond Funds Reimbursement of capital expenditures 62 2 148
615,202 885,625 591,590 133,050
* Transactions are through 5/20/2014
SCHEDULE OF INTERFUND TRANSFERS
(In Thousands)
369
0123456789
From To
Amount
Transferred*
Date
Borrowed Date Settled*
General Fund Cafeteria Fund 4,300,000 $ Cash flow requirements 9/5/2013 10/23/2013
General Fund Cafeteria Fund 600,000 $ Cash flow requirements 10/28/2013 4/3/2014
General Fund Cafeteria Fund 4,600,000 $
Cash flow requirements
5/16/2014
General Fund Child Fund 500,000 $ Cash flow requirements 1/28/2014 2/5/2014
General Fund Child Fund 2,000,000 $ Cash flow requirements 2/11/2014 3/27/2014
General Fund Child Fund 5,000,000 $
Cash flow requirements
5/6/2014 5/8/2014
* Transactions are through 05/20/2014
Temporary Borrowings
Purpose
370
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
371
0123456789
372
0123456789
TAB 30
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division and Information Technology Division Strategic Execution
Plans to Allocate Measure Y Funds to Two Projects Financed by Certificates of Participation
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education authorize the following actions:
(1) Amend the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan (FSD-SEP) to allocate $20.9 Million
of Measure Y funds to prepay a portion of the Certificate of Participation (COPs) issuance used for
the already-defined Cafeteria Management System (CMS) project. The prepayment will be funded
from the School Upgrade Program (SUP) Category of Need for modernizing and repairing school
cafeterias; and
(2) Allocate $12.7 Million of Measure Y funds from the Unallocated SUP Category of Need to the
Technology and Infrastructure and Systems Upgrades Category of Need in the Information Technology
Division SEP ("ITD-SEP"), which will be used, in turn, to defease a portion of the Certificate of
Participation (COPs) issuance used for the already-defined Integrated Student Information System
(ISIS) project; and
Delegate authorization to the Chief Financial Officer, or her designee, to take any and all necessary actions to
complete the defeasance of the debt service payments of 2007 COPs, Series A attributable to the ISIS project
and prepay the 2009 COPs, Series A attributable to the CMS project. The above-identified further allocations
for these COPs defeasances and/or prepayments will come from the new general obligation debt issuance that is
expected to be concluded this summer.
Background:
On August 31, 2010, the Board of Education approved an amendment to the New Construction SEP that,
among other actions, allocated bond funds to pay for a portion of the COPs debt services for the ISIS and CMS
projects (BOE #33-10/11). At the time, the Districts bond counsel advised that bond funds could only be used
for portions of the COPs debt service payments through Fiscal Year 2013-14. Now that this four year fiscal
period is ending, bond counsel advises that the District may fund the final four fiscal years of COPs debt
service payments attributable to ISIS and the full prepayment of the debt service payments attributable to CMS.
The purpose of this Board action is to authorize the defeasance and/or prepayment of the remaining outstanding
balances of the 2007 COPs, Series A attributable to ISIS and the 2009 COPs, Series A attributable to CMS,
using funds from the new general obligation issuance expected to be completed this summer. Portions of those
debt issuances not attributable to ISIS or CMS will continue to be paid by the General Fund and/or unspent
project funds, as the underlying projects are not eligible to be funded from bond funds.
ISIS COPs Defeasance. With respect to the ISIS portion of the debt issuance, a total of $16.1 Million of
remaining gross debt service payments are due from Fiscal Year 2014-15 through Fiscal Year 2017-18.
This amount will be reduced to approximately $12.7 Million at the time of the final debt service
payment with the release of cash from the COPs debt service fund. Should this Board action be
powered by Legistar
373
0123456789
approved, $12.7 Million of bond proceeds would be used to defease the remaining ISIS debt service
payments, thereby providing an equivalent amount of General Fund savings over a three-and-a-half-
year period.
CMS COPs Prepayment. Under the terms of the 2009 COPs, Series A transaction, which funded the
CMS and Newman Nutrition Center projects, the District may pay off the remaining balance of the
COPs as of October 1, 2014. In order to prepay the CMS portion of the 2009 COPs, staff is
recommending allocation of approximately $20.9 Million of additional bond funds. This will provide
an estimated $4.1 Million in annual General Fund savings over a five-year period, through Fiscal Year
2019-2020.
Expected Outcomes:
The further allocation of approximately $20.9 Million and $12.7 Million in bond funds, respectively, to defease
and/or prepay a portion of each of the 2007 COPs, Series A and 2009 COPs, Series A debt issuances. This will
achieve General Fund debt service savings of $35.7 Million over the next four-to-five fiscal year period.
If this request is approved, a total of $33.6 Million in Measure Y funds will be applied to reduce General Fund
debt serve costs and thereby reduce encroachment on the General Fund from capital projects. If this action is
not approved, additional resources from the General Fund will need to be identified to continue to make debt
service payments for the ISIS portion of the 2007 COPs, Series A (through Fiscal Year 2017-18) and the CMS
portion of the 2009 COPs, Series A (through Fiscal Year 2019-2020.)
The defeasance and/or prepayment of portions of the 2007 COPs, Series A and 2009 COPs Series A is in
compliance with the Districts Debt Management Policy - which specifies that the Districts General Fund
should be the funding source of last resort for capital projects.
Budget Impact:
This action will lead to the further allocation of $33.6 Million of Measure Y funds to defease and/or prepay a
portion of each of the 2007 COPs, Series A and 2009 COPs, Series A debt issuances. Approximately $20.9
Million will come from the allocation identified in the SUP to modernize and repair school cafeterias in the
FSD-SEP. $12.7 Million will be transferred from the Unallocated SUP Category of Need to Technology
Infrastructure and System Upgrades in the ITD-SEP, which will be used, in turn, to defease the ISIS COPs.
This action will achieve General Fund debt service savings of $35.7 Million over the next four-to-five fiscal
year period.
Issues and Analysis: N/A
Attachments: Resolution of the BOC.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
374
0123456789
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
Bond Oversight Committee
333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 23
rd
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017Phone: 213. 241.5183Fax: 213.241.8354www.laschools.org/bond
Stephen English, Chair
L.A. City Controllers Office
Pamela Schmidt, Vice-Chair
Early Education Coalition
Quynh Nguyen, Secretary
LAUSD Student Parent
Scott Folsom, Executive Committee
Tenth District PTSA
Joseph P. Buchman Legal Counsel
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Thomas A. Rubin, CPA
Oversight Committee Consultant
Bill Brewington
Thirty-First District PTSA
Paul Escala
CA Charter School Association
Garrett Francis
Assoc. General Contractors of CA
Elizabeth Lugo
LAUSD Student Parent
Abigail Marquez
L.A. City Mayors Office
Ron Miller
L.A. Co. Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
John Naimo
L.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers Office
Scott Pansky
L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce
Barry Waite
CA Tax Reform Assn.
Susan Linschoten (Alternate)
L.A. Co. Auditor-Controllers Office
Gary C. Anderson, PhD
Bond Administrator
Daniel Hwang
Administrative Analyst
RESOLUTION
BOARD REPORT NO. 503-13/14
AMENDMENT TO THE FACILITIES SERVICES DIVISION STRATEGIC EXECUTION
PLAN TO ALLOCATE MEASURE Y FUNDS TO TWO PROJECTS FINANCED BY CERTIFICATES
OF PARTICIPATION
WHEREAS, On August 31, 2010, the Board of Education approved an amendment to the New Construction
SEP that, among other actions, allocated bond funds to pay for aportion of the COPs debt service for the ISIS
and CMS projects(BOE #33-10/11); and
WHEREAS, now that this four year fiscal period is ending, the District may fund the final four fiscal years of
COPs debt service payments attributable to ISIS and the full prepayment of the debt service payments
attributable to CMS; and
WHEREAS, District Staff proposes that the Board of Education approve an amendment to the Facilities
Services Division (FSD) Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to allocate $20.9 Million of Measure Y fundstoprepay
a portion of the Certificate of Participation (COPs) issuance used for the already-defined Cafeteria
Management System (CMS) project. The prepayment will be funded from the School Upgrade Program
(SUP) Category of Need for modernizingand repairingschool cafeterias; and
WHEREAS, District Staff proposes that the Board of Education approve an amendment to the Facilities
Services Division (FSD) Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to allocate $12.7 Million of Measure Y funds from the
Unallocated SUP Category of Need to the Technology and Infrastructure and Systems Upgrades Category of
Need in the Information Technology Division SEP ("ITD-SEP"), which will be used, in turn, to defease a
portion of the Certificate of Participation (COPs) issuance used for the already-defined Integrated Student
Information System (ISIS) project; and
WHEREAS, The defeasance and/or prepayment of portions of the 2007 COPs, Series A and 2009 COPs Series
A is in compliance with the Districts Debt Management Policy which specifies that the Districts General
Fund should be the funding source of last resort for capital projects; and
375
0123456789
RESOLUTION 2014-27
AMENDMENT TO THE FACILITIES SERVICES DIVISION STRATEGIC EXECUTION PLAN
TO DEFINE AND APPROVE FOUR PILOT/SMALL SCHOOL FACILITIES
RECONFIGURATION AND UPGRADE PROJECTS
PAGE 2
Bond Oversight Committee
333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 23
rd
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017Phone: 213. 241.5183Fax: 213.241.8354www.laschools.org/bond
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee recommends that the Board of Education
adopt an amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to allocate $20.9
Million of Measure Y funds to prepay a portion of the Certificate of Participation (COPs) issuance
used for the already-defined Cafeteria Management System (CMS) project, and allocate $12.7 Million
of Measure Y funds from the Unallocated SUP Category of Need to the Technology and Infrastructure
and Systems Upgrades Category of Need in the Information Technology Division SEP ("ITD-SEP"), as
described in the Board Report No. 503-13/14, a copy of which is attached hereto in the form it was
presented to the BOC and is incorporated herein by reference.
2. This resolution shall be transmitted to the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education and
posted on the BOCs website.
3. That a written response, as required by the Charter and Memorandum of Understanding between the
District and the BOC shall be provided to the BOC within 30 days, reporting either action taken or
proposed to be taken in response to this resolution and each recommendation herein.
376
0123456789
TAB 31
Naming of Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte Elementary School
Action Proposed:
Approve the naming of Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte Elementary School to honor the life and community
advocacy of Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte.
The current campus school name is South Region Elementary School #10.
The new campus school name will be: Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte Elementary School.
The school is located in Board District 1 and Educational Service Center West.
Background:
Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte served the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) community for over
40 years in various capacities, including: teacher, principal, director and member of the Board of Education. In
all of these positions, her determined efforts to improve instruction for students and have them achieve
academically was a hallmark. Ms. LaMotte was an educator and advocate for children, her babies, all of her
adult life and professional career, which culminated when she served on the LAUSD Board of Education,
representing Board District 1, for 10 years. The ideals of civil rights and equal justice were her core values.
Ms. LaMottes career with the District began in 1973 at Drew Junior High School as a teacher. She then
accepted a position as head counselor at Edison Junior High School and then promoted to Francis Polytechnic
High School as an assistant principal. In 1984, she became principal of Horace Mann Junior High School.
After four years as principal, Ms. LaMotte was appointed Director of Secondary Instruction for the then titled,
Region C in 1988. The following year she became the Region Administrator of Operations.
Yearning to work directly with students, she requested to return to a principalship and did so in 1991 at
Washington Preparatory Academy Senior High School. Upon retirement, she continued serving the community
as a member of a local school advisory board and volunteered at A Place Called Home, a non-profit
organization that provides educational programs, counseling and mentorship to youth in South Los Angeles. In
2003, Ms. LaMotte answered the call to serve the District again and was elected to represent Board District 1
and was re-elected in 2007.
Ms. LaMotte graduated from Xavier Preparatory High school and the YMCA Business college in New Orleans
and earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Education from Southern University, graduating Summa Cum Laude in
1961. She continued her education, earning a Masters Degree in Education from Louisiana State University in
1965, where she became the first African-American woman to serve as a visiting professor in the School of
Education.
powered by Legistar
377
0123456789
Ms. LaMotte served as president of the Los Angeles Council of Black Administrators, Southern University
Alumni Association, Los Angeles Chapter and The Assault on Illiteracy Program, as well as a volunteer and
member of numerous community and civic organizations.
The community of South Region Elementary School #10 recognizes the valuable contributions of Marguerite
Poindexter LaMotte. The naming of South Region Elementary School #10 to Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte
Elementary School serves to honor the life and service of Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte.
Expected Outcomes:
With the adoption of this report by the Board of Education, Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte Elementary School
will become the permanent name of South Region Elementary School #10.
If a no vote is rendered by the Board of Education, the name of the school will continue to be South Region
Elementary School #10.
None
Budget Impact:
None
None
Attachments:
None
Informatives:
None
powered by Legistar
378
0123456789
TAB 32
Naming of Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics and Science
Action Proposed:
Approve the naming of Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics and Science to honor the life and
technological contributions of Gerald A. Lawson.
The current campus school name is South Region Elementary School #11.
The new campus school name will be: Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts, Mathematics and
Science.
The school is located in Board District 1 and Educational Service Center West.
Background:
Gerald A. Lawson was born in a housing project in Jamaica and grew up the son of a longshoreman and city
employee. The family migrated to New York on December 1, 1940. Throughout his childhood, his parents
encouraged his intellectual pursuits and were determined to assist their son achieve academically. This was
their unwavering focus in spite of the many obstacles they faced.
Upon his graduation from high school, Gerald Lawson attended both Queens College and the City College of
New York. Although he did not complete his degree, he was a self-taught engineer. In the early 1970s, Mr.
Lawson began working at Fairchild, a semiconductor company in the Silicon Valley, as a roving design
consultant. During his tenure at Fairchild, he invented a coin-operated arcade game called Demolition Derby.
At the onset of the computer and video game industries, Gerald A. Lawson was an innovator. After inventing
Demolition Derby, Mr. Lawson was placed in charge of Fairchilds video game division. He and his team
developed the first cartridge-based video game. This allowed for different game programs to be inserted into
the gaming console one at a time without damaging the computers semiconductors. As a result, the company
was able to sell individual games separately. This business model revolutionized the gaming industry and is
still in use today.
In addition, Gerald Lawson was a member of a hobbyist group known as the Homebrew Computer Club. At
the beginning of his membership, he was the only African-American member. Other notable Homebrew
Computer Club members included Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, who later founded Apple Computers.
Mr. Lawson was honored posthumously at the International Game Developers Association in February 2012
for his contributions to the gaming industry.
The community of South Region Elementary School #11 recognizes the valuable contributions of Gerald A.
powered by Legistar
379
0123456789
Lawson. The naming of South Region Elementary School #11 to Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts,
Mathematics and Science serves to honor the life and technological contributions of Gerald A. Lawson.
Expected Outcomes:
With the adoption of this report by the Board of Education, Gerald A. Lawson Academy of the Arts,
Mathematics and Science will become the permanent name of South Region Elementary School #11.
If a no vote is rendered by the Board of Education, the name of the school will continue to be South Region
Elementary School #11.
None
Budget Impact:
None
None
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
380
0123456789
TAB 33
Fiscal Year 2015 OIG Work Plan
Action Proposed:
Approval of the Fiscal Year 2015 Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan.
Background:
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conducts its auditing functions pursuant to Government Auditing
Standards and to auditing standards included in the International Professional Practices framework. Those
standards require that auditing departments prepare an annual audit work plan describing the audits it plans to
do and that the plan be approved by the organizations governing body, in this case, the Board of Education of
the Los Angeles Unified School District (the Board). The attached work plan is a comprehensive plan that
incorporates i) the Boards suggested areas of focus, ii) District Managements suggested areas of focus, and
iii) the results of the OIGs robust risk assessment process. This work plan sets forth how OIG resources will be
used during fiscal year 2015.
Expected Outcomes:
With Board approval of this report, the planned work of the OIG audit units will be deemed to be approved by
the appropriate governing body.
If the Board of Education does not approve this item, then the OIG will lack evidence that its annual work plan
was approved by the appropriate governing body, in this case the Board of Education.
If the Board of Education approves this item, then the OIG will be operating pursuant to auditing standards.
The OIG Charter mandates that OIG auditing services operate pursuant to an approved work plan.
Budget Impact:
None
None
Attachments:
Fiscal Year 2015 Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
381
0123456789
LOSANGELESUNIFIEDSCHOOLDISTRICT
OFFICEOFTHEINSPECTORGENERAL
AnnualWorkPlan
FiscalYear2015
KenBramlett
InspectorGeneral

Report Submitted on 05/29/2014, Revision 1
382
0123456789
383
0123456789
FY2015OIGANNUALWORKPLAN PAGE2
INTERNALAUDITUNIT
The Internal Audit Unit has primary responsibility for conducting performance audits of
programs, processes, functions and systems Districtwide. Audits are done mainlyto evaluate
the efficiency and effectiveness of District operations, to determine if activities are being
carried out in accordance with District policies, applicable laws and regulations, and to assess
whetherdesiredoutcomesarebeingachieved.Additionally,wesupporttheInvestigationsUnit
inrespondingtoallegationsoffraud,waste,andabusefromvarioussourcessuchastheBoard
ofEducation,Districtmanagement,andthepublic.
OurInternalAuditWorkPlanisintendedtobedynamicandflexible,sothatweareabletobe
responsive to emerging risks and changing priorities. Board of Education requests and senior
managementinterestsmayrequirethatweconductreviewsnotlistedinthisWorkPlan,orthat
audits listed in this Work Plan be deferred or not performed at all, based on new information
received during the year. Beginning in FY 2015, a concerted effort will be made to report on
significantchangestotheInternalAuditWorkPlanonaquarterlybasis.
TheproposedprojectsforFY2015 includesomediscretionaryaudits.Discretionaryauditsare
thoseauditsthataredeemedimportantenoughforinclusionintheWorkPlan,butwhichmay
requireadditionalresourcesthatmayormaynotbeavailabletotheOIGduringthefiscalyear.
Accordingly, we will decide which discretionary audits should be conducted based upon
available resources, risk and potential effects on the Districts mission and goals. The OIG has
engaged District management over the last few months to discuss their goals, priorities and
related risks for FY 2015. We have used this information to prepare a robust work plan that
attemptstoaddresssomeoftheDistrictsmoresignificantandevolvingpriorities.
INTERNALAUDITWORKPLANPROJECTS
NONFACILITIESRELATED
ScheduledAudits
1. MobileDeviceManagementandSecurityforMobileDevices
Mobile Device Management (MDM) is a process for securing, monitoring, managing and
supporting mobile devices. An MDM solution is a method that can enable organizations to
manage portable devices and enforce securitypolicies remotely, onceusers have installed the
software on their devices and agreed to the organizations terms and conditions. Typically, an
organization can support mobile devices by allowing users to access proprietary resources
remotelyandconveniently.ThisauditwillfocusonMobileDeviceManagementandSecurityas
it relates to the tablets issued to students as part of the Common Core Technology Project
(CCTP).TheoverallobjectiveoftheauditwillbetoassesstheDistrictsmobiledevicestrategy,
includingconsiderationofsecurityandriskmanagementrequirementstoprotectstudentsand
384
0123456789
the Districts proprietary and sensitive information. Our audit will also include an assessment
of the appropriateness of the Districts MDM strategy given the number of additional devices
thatarestillexpectedtobeissuedtostudentsinthefutureaspartoftheCCTP.
Basis:OIGRiskAssessment.
District Strategy Supported: Ensure a safe, caring, and nurturing environment for all youth;
Operateaneffective,efficient,andtransparentorganizationinordertoassurethepublictrust.
DistrictGoalSupported:Proficiencyforall;Schoolsafety.
2. TitleI,PartAProcess
TitleI,PartAisafederalprogramprovidingsupplementalfundstoLocalEducationalAgencies
assisting students in poverty to meet challenging state academic standards. Each school that
receives these funds must provide parents of participating children timely information about
the program. Parents must be involved in an organized, ongoing, and timely way in the
planning,reviewandimprovementoftheschoolsTitleIprogram.Thisreviewwillfocusonthe
followingareasoftheTitleIprocess:
InformationandCommunication:ThereviewwilldetermineifTitleI,PartAinformation
iseffectivelycommunicatedtoparentsinatimelymanner.
Effectiveness of Application Process: The review will determine if the Title I application
processcanbeimprovedforeachschoolsite.
Budget: The review will determine if each school has uptodate information on how
manyTitleI,PartAdollarsareavailablethroughouttheschoolyear.
Allocationandpaymentofcoststoadministertheprogram.
Basis:BoardMemberRequest.
District Strategy Supported: Transform teaching and learning so that we prepare all youth to
graduate college and workforce ready; Ensure there is an effective employee at every level of
theorganizationfocusedonimprovingstudentoutcomes.
District Goal Supported: Proficiency for all; Parent and community engagement; 100%
graduation.
3. EmployeeAttendanceReporting
This audit will review the reliability, timeliness and consistency of the employee attendance
reporting data. The audit will also examine ways to improve teacher attendance, thereby
minimizing the use of substitutes. Finally, the audit will analyze attendance reporting and
improvementpracticesofotherschooldistricts.
Basis:OIGRiskAssessment;ManagementRequest.
District Strategy Supported: Operate an effective, efficient, and transparent organization in
ordertoassurethepublictrust.
DistrictGoalSupported:Proficiencyforall.
385
0123456789
4. CharterSchoolAuditsCharterCompliance,FinancialOperations,Governance
ThisseriesofauditswillassisttheCharterSchoolsDivisioninitsmonitoringeffortsoverDistrict
charter schools. Specifically, our audits will determine whether selected charter schools are
complying with the Charter School Act of 1992; adhering to the conditions, standards and
procedures outlined in their Charter Agreement; and accurately recording and reporting
apportionmentdata.Thespecificschoolstobeauditedwillbeidentifiedduringthefiscalyear.
District Strategy Supported: Provide a portfolio of high quality schools for youth, families and
communities.
BoardGoalSupported:Proficiencyforall.
5. CharterSchoolCloseouts
Theseauditswillverifywhethertheassetsandliabilitiesreportedforcharterschoolsthathave
ceased operations are accurate, and without any material misstatement. These audits should
assisttheCharterSchoolsDivisiontoproperlyassessanyfunds/assetsduetotheDistrictandto
identifyanyunreportedliabilitiesthattheschoolsmayhaveincurredatanearlierdate.
District Strategy Supported: Operate an effective, efficient and transparent organization in
6. CafeteriaManagementSystem(CMS)
This audit will determine whether proper controls are in place within the Cafeteria
Management System,which is intended to support the provision of healthy meals to students
whilecollectingeligibilitydatamoreefficientlyandaccurately.Theauditwillreviewtheprocess
andcontrolsoverdatacapture,reimbursementclaims,menuplanningandnutritionalanalysis,
procurement,productionandinventorycontrols.
7. SchoolCrisisTeams2
InFY2014,theOIGperformedanauditwhichexaminedwhetherDistrictschoolswerecreating
and maintaining School Crisis Teams in compliance with District policies and procedures and
State and Federal laws and regulations. This audit will focus on the same subject area but
386
0123456789
expandtheauditscopetoincludecharterschoolsaswellasothertraditionalschoolsthatwere
notpartoftheoriginaltestpopulation.
communities.
8. TextbookOrderingProcess
In 2011, the OIG audited the textbook ordering process. At the time, the former local district
offices took an active role in overseeing the process. Since then, the District has undergone
reorganizationandtherehavebeenchangesmadetoapplicablelawsandtheDistrictsordering
process. The purpose of this audit is to examine the new textbook ordering process for
efficiencyandeffectiveness,withaspecialfocusonthereceiptoftextbooksatschoolsites.
9. SchoolFinancialOperations
This series of audits will verify that financial activities at selected school sites are properly
managed and controlled in accordance with District policies and procedures. These audits are
being performed to assist the District in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities over school
financial operations such as management of student body funds, imprest funds, and
procurement card transactions. The specific schools will be identified during the fiscal year
basedonrequestsreceivedfromPrincipals.
District Strategy Supported: Provide a portfolio of highquality schools for all youth, families
andcommunities.
DistrictGoalSupported:ProficiencyforAll.
10. CorrectiveActionNotice(CAN)ProcessImprovement
The OIG audited school cleanliness districtwide and found that the Corrective Action Notices
(CANs) issued to schools describing conditions that needed to be addressed were not closed
withintherequiredtimelines.ThisauditwillfocusonwhetherthenewOfficeofEnvironmental
HealthandSafety(OEHS)CANprocesshasimprovedthetimelinessinwhichCANsareclosedin
accordancewithDistrictpolicy.
387
0123456789
DistrictStrategySupported:Ensureasafe,caring,andnurturingenvironmentforallyouth.
11. EmergencyPreparednessofSchools
In 2012, the OIG examined the emergency preparedness of newly opened school complexes.
This audit will expand the audit scope to include established schools from both the traditional
and charter school populations. This audit will focus on determining whether the District is in
compliance with District policies and procedures related to emergency and disaster
preparednesswiththegoalofkeepingstudentsandschoolstaffsafe.
ordertoassurethepublictrust;Ensureasafe,caring,andnurturingenvironmentforallyouth.
12. FleetVehiclesMaintenanceofanagingFleet
This audit will determine whether cost effectiveness is achieved in maintaning older trucks,
vans and administrative automobiles, and will also evaluate the adequacy of the replacement
planforsuchvehicles.
13. StudentSuspensionTracking
Suspensions are defined as the removal of a student from ongoing instruction. Suspension is
onemethodthatmaybeusedtoassistindevelopingacceptablestudentconductincompliance
with the Education Code. This audit will focus on internal controls over the recording of
suspensionsintheIntegratedStudentInformationSystem(ISIS)systemandwhetherthedatais
supportedbystudentrecordsinaccordancewiththeEducationCode.

388
0123456789
DiscretionaryAudits
1. ThirdPartyPayrollDeduction
Thisauditwillfocusonwhetherthirdpartypaymentsdeductedfromemployeepaychecksare
senttothethirdpartyvendororagencyinatimelymanner.
2. EmployeeOvertimePayrollServicesBranch
This audit will assess the reasonableness of the level of overtime worked by personnel of the
Payroll Services Branch and evaluate whether work is being performed in the most efficient
manner.
Basis:BoardRequest.
3. SAPControlsandTransactionsAudits
In 2005, the District began replacing its legacybased budget, human resources, payroll,
financialandprocurementinformationsystemswithaSystems,ApplicationandProducts(SAP)
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platform. In 2007, after the payroll, human resources, and
part of the financial systems had been SAPenabled, the ERP implementation was placed on
hold. In January 2012, the District reinitiated its effort to complete the legacy replacement
process for the remaining legacy systems that were still supporting procurement and part of
the financial systems. In these audits, we willassess the use of SAP configurable controls and
wewillanalyzetransactionsprocessedthroughSAPsuchasaccountingentries,approvals,and
payments to determine whether the system was configured with adequate controls to ensure
dataintegrity.
4. ReviewofSpaceAllocationforthePersonnelCommission
According to Personnel Commission (PC) senior staff, there has been a 60% increase in the
389
0123456789
number of applications for employment received by PC as compared to last year and a 25%
increaseinthenumberofcandidatesthattooktheemploymenttests.Theseincreasescoupled
with the loss of space at the Shatto Building have adversely impacted the performance of PC.
ThisreviewwillassessthecurrentspaceallocationforPCandexaminevariouswaystoresolve
anyspaceallocationissues.
Basis: ManagementRequest.
INTERNALAUDITWORKPLANPROJECTS
FACILITIESRELATED
ScheduledAudits
1. SmallBusinessEnterpriseProgram
In2003,theBoardofEducationestablisheda25%SmallBusinessEnterprise(SBE)participation
goalonallDistrictcontracts.In2010,theBoardofEducationauthorizedabidpreferenceofup
to 5% to certified small businesses bidding on low bid construction contracts, in order to
encourage more SBE participation. In the latest OIG audit on the SBE program, the reported
participation rate of 48% was based on incomplete data and only contract award data. Since
2013, a new SBE calculation format has been implemented by the Facilities Services Division
that is based on payment information rather than contract award information. The focus of
this audit is to determine the accuracy of the SBE participation rate based on the new
calculationmethodology.
DistrictGoalSupported:Schoolsafety;Parentandcommunityengagement.
2. FollowuponDSACloseoutProcess
According to the California Field Act, all construction projects are subject to Division of the
State Architect (DSA) certification to ensure strucutral safety, fire and life safety, and
accessibility. In 2012, the OIG completed an audit of the Districts DSA Closeout Certification
Processandprovided33recommendationstoDistrictmanagementtoincreaseefficienciesand
effectivenessinthecloseoutprocess.ThisfollowupauditwilldeterminetowhatextentDistrict
management addressed concerns raised in the 2012 OIG audit and whether District
management has implemented our audit recommendations or accepted the risk of not taking
action.
390
0123456789
DistrictGoalSupported:Schoolsafety.
3. LaborComplianceProgram
California Labor Code and Education Code statutes require labor compliance programs to
monitor and enforce compliance with applicable prevailing wage requirements for any public
worksprojectspaidforwithpublicfunds,withincertainstatutesoflimitationperiods.In1985,
the District began administering a program for monitoring the prevailing wage rates paid to
construction workers on public works projects throughout the District. This audit will focus on
the Districts efficiency in performing labor compliance assessments within specific mandated
timelines.
DistrictGoalSupported:Schoolsafety;Parentandcommunityengagement.
4. ConstructabilityReview
Constructability Reviews are intended to provide assurance that design plans, specifications,
biddocuments,andsupportingdocumentationarecomplete,accurate,andtransparentbefore
constructionbegins.Inthisaudit,wewilldeterminetowhatextentconstructabilityreviewsadd
valuetotheconstructionprogramandarecosteffectivetoperform.
communities.
DistrictGoalSupported:Schoolsafety;Proficiencyforall.
5. SiteAssignedMaintenanceWorkProgram
Maintenanceworkersperformavarietyoftasksthatarecriticalinthemaintenanceandrepair
of schools and offices, maintaining equipment, appliances, grounds, as well as moving and
installing school and office equipment and furniture. This audit will examine whether
maintenanceworkersareperformingdutiesinaccordancewiththeirjobclassification.
DistrictGoalSupported:Schoolsafety;Proficiencyforall.

391
0123456789
6. HazardousWasteHandlingandDisposalProcess
The OEHS Environmental Compliance Group is key to the safe handling, collection and
appropriate disposal of hazardous waste that is generated by schools and other District
facilities. The process is managed by OEHS in coordination with the Maintenance and
Operations Branch. This audit will examine the process of the collection and disposal of
hazardous waste generated by schools and other District facilities and determine whether
internalcontrolsareworkingasintended.
392
0123456789
CONTRACTAUDITUNIT
The Contract Audit Unit has principal responsibility for auditing bond funded contracts and
some nonbond funded contracts. The Contract Audit Work Plan for FY 2015 identifies
projected audits for several divisions within the District. The Work Plan includes 35 projects
with a total contract value of over $849 million. The OIGs bond budget is approximately $2.8
million, which consists of $2.7 million for internal staff costs, $100,000 for external staff costs
and $20,000 for costs associated with equipment, travel and training. The cost for audits and
salariesforthisfiscalyearwillbecoveredbyMeasureYbondfunds.
We conducted several interviews with District management as part of our risk assessment for
this Work Plan. Based on those interviews, we identified several critical areas that may pose
risks or opportunities to District operations and are aligned with the Districts goals and
strategies.Theseareasarelistedbelow.
CONTRACTAUDITWORKPLANPROJECTS
1. ConstructionContracts
Thegoalofexaminingthecontractsinthisareawillbetoensurethatthecontractorcompleted
the construction as required and that contingency and allowance disbursements are drawn
downinaccordancewiththerequirementsofthecontract.
communities;Ensureasafe,caring,andnurturingenvironmentforallyouth.
2. ProfessionalServicesContracts
The District contracts with various vendors for goods and services other than construction
services. These services include providing plumbing supplies, food processing, supplemental
educationservicesandtransportation. Thegoalofexaminingthesecontractsistoensurethat
the service providers are complying with the requirements of their individual agreements and
thattheDistrictwasprovidedtheservicesitpaidfor.
communities; Operate an effective, efficient, and transparent organization in order to assure
thepublictrust.

393
0123456789
3. TechnicalEvaluations
We will perform technical evaluations of several completed projects to ensure that these
projects complied with contract documents, specifications and Division of the State Architect
(DSA)requirements.
communities.
4. ChangeOrders
We will review construction change orders in excess of $500,000 to determine whether the
costsbilledonthechangeordersarereasonableandallowableunderthetermsofthecontract.
We will also determine whether the work detailed in the change orders is within the original
scopeofwork.
thepublictrust.
DistrictGoalSupported:Proficiencyforall;Schoolsafety.
5. PreAwardAudits
Wewilldeterminethereasonablenessoftheratesproposedbycontractors/vendorsforDistrict
projects.TheauditedratesareusedbyDistrictstafftonegotiatecompetitivecontractsforthe
District.
thepublictrust.
Acompletelistingofthe35projectstobecompletedbytheContractAuditUnitisattachedas
ExhibitAtothisdocument.

394
0123456789
INVESTIGATIONSUNIT
For FY 2015, in addition to responding to allegations of individual misconduct, we also plan to

proactively focus on certain strategic areas and activities that we believe will provide the
Districtwithaddedprotectionofpublicresources.
One important initiative in FY 2015 will be restoring staff capacity and expertise in the
Investigations Unit. In recent years, budget cuts and attrition have deprived the Investigations
Unitofappropriatestaffinglevelsandtrainingopportunities.ThefillingoftheDeputyInspector
General, Investigations position as well as the Supervising Investigator position will give the
InvestigationsUnitthefullcomplementofleadershipthatitneeds.TheInvestigationsUnitwill
continuetoconcentrateitsresourcesonthosehighriskareasthathavethegreatestpotential
for finding and deterring fraud, waste, and abuse. The Work Plan identifies the major areas in
whichwewillconcentrateourresources.
1. EmployeeReassignment
ThisspecialreviewwillexaminethepoliciesandproceduresrelatedtothisDistrict'spracticeof
reassigningemployeestoanonclassroomsettingwhenthereareallegationsrelatedtostudent
safety. The review will examine District policies and procedures in light of current applicable
lawsandregulationsandcollectivebargainingagreements.
2. TheFraudHotline
TheDistrictsFraudHotline,whichgenerateshundredsofcomplaintsfromvarioussourceseach
year,ismanagedbytheInvestigationsUnit.ExpandingtheFraudHotlinewillbeanimportant
initiative in the upcoming fiscal year. The expansion will include not only responding to
allegations of fraud, waste and abuse, but also ensuring that matters referred to other
departmentsintheDistrictareadequatelyaddressed.Thisinitiativealsoincludesamorevisible
presenceoftheHotlinenumberontheDistrictsWebsiteandanoutreachcampaigntoincrease
awarenessoftheexistenceoftheOIGHotlineamongDistrictstaffandparents.
3. EmployeeIntegrity
Employee integrity investigations will continue to be a focus area due to reports received
through the Fraud Hotline. These investigations focus on allegations related to
misappropriationoffunds,embezzlement,payrollfraud,falsificationofdocuments,propertyor
equipment misuse, theft of property, conflicts of interest, nepotism, forgery, and ethics
violations. Employee misuse of the Districtissued procurement credit card (PCard) continues
tobeanareaofconcernfortheDistrict,andwewilldevotesufficientresourcestoinvestigate
these matters. To enhance District wide awareness of employee integrity issues, we will
conductfraudawarenesstrainingattheEducationalServiceCenter(ESC)leveltobetterapprise
395
0123456789
Districtmanagementandstaffoftheseissuesandhowtopreventthem.Inaddition,forthose
areasthatrequireadministrativereviewbutthatdonorisetothelevelofanOIGinvestigation,
wewillprovideinvestigativeassistancetotheESCoperationsstaffhandlingthesematters.
4. WhistleblowerInvestigations
PersonswhoreportimpropergovernmentalactivityinvolvingtheDistrictareprotectedagainst
retaliation, interference, intimidation, threats or similar acts. The OIG has the authority to
investigateviolationsoftheWhistleblowerProtectionPolicy.InFY2015,theOIGwillendeavor
to thoroughly investigate any and all credible complaints of violations of the Districts
WhistleblowerProtectionPolicy.
5. SchoolConstructionandModernizationProgram
The Districts multibillion dollar school construction and modernization program is moving
awayfromnewconstructionandbecomemoreconcentratedonmodernization.Asaresult,the
numberofcontractorsthattheFacilitiesServicesDivision(FSD)willmanagewilllikelyincrease,
andtherebyrequiremorediligencefromDistrictstaffandtheOIG.Additionally,itmayinvolve
more contracts being issued pursuant to the Job Order Contracting (JOC) process which again
willrequiremoreDistrictandOIGawarenessoftheprocessandtherisksofimproperconduct.
In the upcoming year, we will endeavor to create more Facilities and Procurement fraud
expertiseintheOIGbyobtainingtrainingfromexpertsintheseareas.
6. DueDiligenceReviews
We will continue our public record search program as a service to the District on vendors and
contractors involved with the Districts school construction and modernization projects, its
charter schools, and of senior management hires. The FSD uses OIG Due diligence reports in
theirselectionofthemostqualifiedfirmstobuildandmodernizeourschools.TheDistrictuses
severalhundredcontractorsintheconstructionprogram.Thedemandforthisworkislikelyto
increaseasthebuildingprogrambecomesmoreconcentratedonmodernization.
California State law requires that the District maintain oversight of charter schools. We will
continue to conduct due diligence reviews on charter schools and their principal officers to
assisttheCharterSchoolsDivision (CSD)inmakingfairandequitablerecommendationstothe
BoardofEducationwithrespecttotheapprovalandrenewalofcharterschoolpetitions.
We willalso continue to assist the Personnel Commission in its role ofmanaging the selection
processforseniormanagementpersonnel.
7. CharterSchools
TheDistrictnowmaintainsoversightofapproximately250charterschools.Asaresult,thereis
increased oversight risk with the growth in the number of charter schools. In the upcoming
396
0123456789
fiscalyear,theOIGwillseektoworkcollaborativelywithCSDtoshareappropriateinformation
thatcanstrengthentheDistrictsoversightcapabilitiesovercharterschools.
OTHEROIGACTIVITIES
FraudAlerts
Fraud Alerts are an important tool for deterring the continuation of fraudulent activities that
havebeenidentifiedbytheOIG.OurgoalistoissueatleasttwoFraudAlertsintheupcoming
fiscalyearasameansofinformingDistrictmanagementofissuesofconcernandasameansof
leveragingOIGfindingsofindividualactstoabroaderDistrictaudience.
SpecialReviews
As a supplement to the audit and investigative functions, the OIG also performs Special
Reviews. There are two types of Special Reviews one is a shortterm (usually 23 months)
managementorprogramreviewthatfocusesonanissueorconcernoftheBoardofEducation,
theSuperintendent,orDistrictmanagement.Theseshorttermreviewsexamineprogramsfrom
a broader, more issueoriented perspective than traditional audits or investigations. These
reviews also combine some of the best features of several disciplines; including program
evaluation, survey research, operational auditing, program monitoring, compliance reviews,
legal analysis, investigations, and management analysis. Through these shortterm special
reviews, we are able to provide timely, useful, reliable information and advice to District
decisionmakers.
The second type of Special Review is a preliminary analysis (usually less than 30 days) of a
specific issue or concern to determine whether a more indepth, independent audit or
investigationshouldbeconducted.
397
0123456789
ExhibitA

I
t
e
m
N
o
.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
o
.
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
/
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
O
F
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
E
D
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
m
o
u
n
t
T
y
p
e
o
f
A
u
d
i
t
U
s
e
r
D
e
p
t
.
1
1
1
1
0
0
7
7
S
w
i
n
e
r
t
o
n
J
o
r
d
a
n
S
H
(
D
e
s
i
g
n
B
u
i
l
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
)
$
6
7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
2
1
1
1
0
0
4
2
P
i
n
n
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
I
n
c
.
D
o
r
s
e
y
S
H
N
e
w
G
y
m
/
N
e
w
C
L
R
M
S
(
1
7
4
0
6
)
$
2
7
,
9
8
9
,
5
9
9
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
3
1
2
1
0
0
4
4
T
u
r
n
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
G
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
H
S
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
M
a
i
n
B
l
d
g
/
A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
(
1
7
4
0
6
)
$
4
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
1
A
&
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
I
n
c
.
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
S
H
H
V
A
C
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
$
5
,
2
3
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
5
1
2
1
0
0
6
3
W
.
E
.
O
'
N
e
i
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
o
u
t
h
P
a
r
k
E
L
N
e
w
F
o
o
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
I
n
d
o
o
r
D
i
n
i
n
g
$
4
,
5
9
3
,
6
4
8
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
6
1
3
1
0
0
0
4
F
r
e
d
r
i
c
k
T
o
w
e
r
s
I
n
c
.
N
o
b
e
l
M
S
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
B
o
i
l
e
r
&
C
h
i
l
l
e
r
$
2
,
2
7
8
,
2
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
7
1
0
1
0
0
8
6
H
e
n
s
e
l
P
h
e
l
p
s
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
.
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
R
e
g
i
o
n
E
S
#
2
0
N
e
w
P
a
i
n
t
$
4
1
,
0
0
6
,
3
6
4
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
8
1
3
1
0
0
1
0
A
P
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
G
r
o
u
p
I
n
c
.
M
a
r
k
h
a
m
M
S
S
M
2
F
i
r
e
A
l
a
r
m
&
A
/
C
A
d
m
i
n
M
u
s
i
c
L
i
b
S
h
o
p
B
l
d
g
$
2
,
9
9
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
9
1
3
1
0
1
0
6
A
v
a
B
u
i
l
d
e
r
s
I
n
c
.
M
u
i
r
M
S
F
i
r
e
A
l
a
r
m
$
2
,
4
6
5
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
1
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
7
P
C
N
3
,
I
n
c
.
A
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
$
1
,
7
3
7
,
7
5
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
$
1
9
7
,
2
9
0
,
5
6
1
1
1
1
2
5
0
0
8
1
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
o
n
'
s
R
e
a
d
y
M
i
x
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
M
&
O
w
i
t
h
r
e
a
d
y
m
i
x
e
d
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
p
e
a
g
r
a
v
e
l
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
$
9
3
,
5
9
4
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
1
2
1
1
5
0
0
0
3
F
e
r
g
u
s
o
n
E
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
s
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
l
u
m
b
i
n
g
s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
t
o
M
&
O
.
$
3
9
,
3
6
4
,
5
3
7
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
J
e
n
n
i
e
T
u
r
k
e
y
S
t
o
r
e
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
U
S
D
A
r
a
w
,
b
u
l
k
f
a
r
m
l
e
v
e
l
c
o
m
m
o
d
i
t
i
e
s
.
$
5
2
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
1
4
1
2
0
0
0
1
7
G
o
l
d
S
t
a
r
F
o
o
d
s
,
I
n
c
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
p
e
r
i
s
h
a
b
l
e
f
o
o
d
s
.
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
1
5
1
2
2
0
0
1
9
F
i
v
e
S
t
a
r
G
o
u
r
m
e
t
F
o
o
d
s
,
I
n
c
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
v
e
g
e
t
a
b
l
e
s
.
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
1
6
1
4
5
0
0
1
4
F
i
r
s
t
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
I
n
c
.
T
o
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
$
2
2
,
1
0
7
,
1
9
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
T
B
1
7
1
0
0
0
0
5
2
E
d
u
c
a
r
e
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
B
e
f
o
r
e
a
n
d
A
f
t
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
$
1
3
,
0
9
7
,
6
0
4
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
B
T
B
1
8
0
7
5
0
0
9
4
A
v
a
y
a
,
I
n
c
.
P
B
X
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
I
T
D
1
9
1
2
0
0
1
8
7
T
o
s
h
i
b
a
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
m
u
l
t
i
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
d
e
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
t
o
a
l
l
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
P
S
D
2
0
1
0
5
0
0
8
1
H
i
r
s
c
h
P
i
p
e
&
S
u
p
p
l
y
C
o
.
,
I
n
c
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
f
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
,
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
o
l
e
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
t
s
$
2
3
,
3
0
2
,
3
6
1
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
M
&
O
$
4
8
8
,
6
1
5
,
6
9
2
2
1
N
/
A
P
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
3
9
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
J
o
b
s
A
c
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
h
o
w
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
s
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
i
n
g
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
b
e
f
u
n
d
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
P
r
o
p
.
3
9
.
$
2
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
2
2
T
B
D
I
T
D
W
i
f
i
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
I
T
D
'
s
w
i
f
i
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
f
o
r
"
S
B
A
C
"
C
o
m
m
o
n
C
o
r
e
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
T
B
D
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
2
3
T
B
D
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
F
S
D
'
s
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
l
y
a
t
r
i
s
k
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
T
B
D
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
2
4
N
/
A
F
S
D
Q
A
/
Q
C
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
Q
A
/
Q
C
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
N
A
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
2
5
N
/
A
M
&
O
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
M
&
O
'
s
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
i
n
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
a
l
l
s
r
o
u
t
i
n
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
d
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
P
l
a
n
)
T
B
D
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
2
6
N
/
A
G
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
8
4
(
2
0
0
6
)
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
N
a
t
u
r
e
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
w
i
t
h
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
o
r
n
a
t
u
r
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
F
S
D
h
a
s
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
b
u
i
l
t
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
g
a
r
d
e
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
I
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
t
h
e
r
L
A
U
S
D
g
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
h
e
S
E
E
D
S
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
T
B
D
T
e
c
h
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
F
S
D
$
2
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
A
U
D
I
T
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
F
Y
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
T
O
T
A
L
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
:
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
T
O
T
A
L
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
S
:
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
E
V
A
L
U
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
T
A
L
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
E
V
A
L
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
:
398
0123456789
ExhibitA

I
t
e
m
N
o
.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
o
.
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
/
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
O
F
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
E
D
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
m
o
u
n
t
T
y
p
e
o
f
A
u
d
i
t
U
s
e
r
D
e
p
t
.
2
7
T
B
D
P
r
e
A
w
a
r
d
A
u
d
i
t
s
P
r
e
a
w
a
r
d
a
u
d
i
t
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
u
p
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
'
o
r
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
'
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
a
u
d
i
t
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
r
a
t
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
o
n
L
A
U
S
D
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
.
T
B
D
P
r
e
A
w
a
r
d
P
S
D
/
F
S
D
2
8
T
B
D
C
h
a
n
g
e
O
r
d
e
r
A
u
d
i
t
s
C
h
a
n
g
e
o
r
d
e
r
a
u
d
i
t
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
u
p
o
n
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
f
o
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
o
r
d
e
r
s
o
v
e
r
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
t
h
e
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
d
a
m
o
u
n
t
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d
a
n
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
'
s
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
T
B
D
C
h
a
n
g
e
O
r
d
e
r
F
S
D
2
9
T
B
D
A
u
d
i
t
o
f
J
O
C
N
o
n
p
r
e
p
r
i
c
e
d
I
t
e
m
s
A
u
d
i
t
s
o
f
n
o
n
p
r
e
p
r
i
c
e
d
i
t
e
m
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
u
p
o
n
F
S
D
'
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
n
o
n
p
r
e
p
r
i
c
e
d
i
t
e
m
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
y
J
O
C
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
.
T
B
D
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
N
/
A
3
0
N
/
A
J
o
b
O
r
d
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
W
e
w
i
l
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
p
r
e
q
u
a
l
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
j
o
b
o
r
d
e
r
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
.
N
/
A
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
F
S
D
3
1
N
/
A
I
T
D
A
s
s
e
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
a
c
c
u
r
a
c
y
o
f
I
T
D
'
s
A
s
s
e
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
D
a
t
a
b
a
s
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
s
s
e
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
.
N
/
A
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
I
T
D
3
2
0
9
5
0
0
2
8
A
p
p
l
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
A
p
p
l
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
.
$
9
6
,
0
0
7
,
7
4
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
V
a
r
i
o
u
s
3
3
1
0
1
0
0
6
6
T
i
l
d
e
n
C
o
i
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
s
I
n
c
.
V
a
l
l
e
y
R
e
g
S
P
A
N
#
2
S
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
7
/
1
2
$
3
5
,
5
9
2
,
9
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
3
4
1
2
1
0
0
6
3
W
.
E
.
O
'
N
e
i
l
l
S
o
u
t
h
P
a
r
k
E
S
(
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
3
/
1
4
)
$
4
,
8
2
3
,
3
3
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
3
5
1
2
1
0
0
8
7
D
a
v
i
s
R
e
e
d
6
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
S
(
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
8
/
1
3
)
$
2
,
9
6
9
,
4
0
0
I
n
c
u
r
r
e
d
C
o
s
t
F
S
D
$
1
3
9
,
3
9
3
,
3
7
0
$
8
4
9
,
2
9
9
,
6
2
3
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
:
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
A
U
D
I
T
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
F
Y
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
A
S
N
E
E
D
E
D
A
U
D
I
T
S
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
N
E
E
D
E
D
A
U
D
I
T
S
:
C
A
R
R
Y
O
V
E
R
A
U
D
I
T
S
T
O
T
A
L
C
A
R
R
Y
O
V
E
R
A
U
D
I
T
S
:
399
0123456789
Knowaboutfraud,wasteorabuse?
Tellusaboutit.
Maybe you are a School District

Employee, or maybe you are a
privatecitizen.Eitherway,youarea
taxpayer.
Maybe you know something about

fraud, or waste, or some other type
ofabuseintheSchoolDistrict.
The Office of the Inspector General

hasahotlineforyoutocall.Youcan
alsowritetous.
If you wish, we will keep your

identityconfidential.Youcanremain
anonymous, if you prefer. And you
are protected by law from reprisal
byyouremployer.
Callthehotline:
(213)2417778
Or
(866)LAUSDOIG
(866)5287364
Writetous:
FraudHotlineCenter
333S.BeaudryAve.,12
th
Floor
LosAngeles,CA90017
Website:
www.lausdoig.org

400
0123456789
401
0123456789
402
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
403
0123456789
404
0123456789
TAB 34

WITHDRAWN PRIOR TO
MEETING

TAB 35
Submission of 2014-15 Consolidated Application for Categorical Aid Programs
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the District submit the 2014-15 Consolidated Application for Funding Categorical Aid
Programs to the California Department of Education (CDE); and that the estimated entitlement amount for
programs in the Consolidated Application be included in the Superintendents 2014-15 Budget.
Background:
The Consolidated Application has become a multi-part data collection with multiple due dates throughout the
year. The following CARS Data Collection Schedule is subject to change:
CARS Spring 2014 Data Collection - June 30, 2014
CARS Winter 2014 Data Collection - February 28, 2015
The Consolidated Application will continue to collect the following information: applications for federal
funding, legal assurances, categorical program budget and expenditure reports, and categorical program activity
reports.
As a result of Local Control Funding Formula effective July 1, 2013, state categorical programs such as
Economic Impact Aid (EIA) are no longer included in the consolidated application.
Expected Outcomes:
The approval of the FY 2014-15 Consolidated Application will allow the District to file multiple Consolidated
Application Data Collections with the California Department of Education.
Approval of the Consolidated Application will enable the District to continue funding a variety of programs
supported with federal categorical program resources (see Budget Impact).
No District policy will be changed by approval of this action.
Budget Impact:
The estimated entitlement amount of $348.2 million in federal programs includes the following:
Funding Source Amount
Title I, Part A (Basic Grant) $290,409,038
Title I, Part D (Delinquent) $998,414
Title II, Part A (Teacher Quality) $41,942,088
Title III, Part A (English Learners) $14,862,088
TOTAL $348,211,628
powered by Legistar
427
0123456789
Not applicable
Attachments:
Informative: Submission of 2014-15 Consolidated Application for Funding Categorical Aid Programs
powered by Legistar
428
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
429
0123456789
430
0123456789
TAB 36
File #: Res-042-11/12, Version: 1
Ms. Garca, Ms. Galatzan - Recommitting to 21st Century Learning for Students
(Noticed December 17, 2013)
Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District understands
the urgency and importance of 21st century learning and the responsibility it has to
students to act immediately on related matters;
Whereas, The week of December 9th through the 15th marked Computer Science Education
Week, a flash point for highlighting the clear need for more exposure to technology,
programing and digital media to all students;
Whereas, Common Core instructional curriculum standards require that students use
computing devices for acquiring skills for digital presentations and web based
research;
Whereas, The Board recognizes the importance of a timely and effective deployment of
computing devices in order to accelerate student familiarity with the testing devices
for the 2015-2016 Common Core Curriculum;
Whereas, On November 12, 2013, the Board voted 6-1 to move forward with Phase 2 of
the Common Core Technology Project after many meetings and hours of discussion;
Whereas, A delayed vote could hinder the effective deployment of Phase 2; tablets,
exploratory laptop projects and future related evaluations and slow the deployment to
38 of the districts neediest schools registered with the Office of Civil Rights for
oversight; and
Whereas, Various trainings and professional development have been diligently
calendared and planned out for teachers and District staff and would have to be
canceled; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District
authorizes the Superintendent to proceed on approved Board action of November 12,
2013, for the Common Core Technology Plan.
powered by Legistar
431
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
432
0123456789
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Transmittal Form
TO: Michelle King, Deputy Superintendent DATE: 1/14/14

FROM: Tony Atienza, Director
Budget Services and Financial Planning
SUBJECT: BOARD RESOLUTION: BUDGET IMPACT STATEMENT
Resolution Title: Recommitting to 21
st
Century
Learning for Students
Presented By: Ms. Monica Garcia, Ms. Tamar Galatzan
Date Noticed: December 17, 2013 Date Presented for Action: J anuary 14, 2014
Budget Impact
The costs of this action are detailed in Board Report 129-13/14. As identified in the report, the total cost of
the previously approved resolution is $114,858,983. While the largest portion of this expense will be
funded using bond proceeds, there is a General Fund impact in 2013-14 of $548,978 and $11,200,000 in
fiscal year 2014-15. The detailed analysis of costs is available as Attachment D to Board Report 129-13/14
which was part of the December 10, 2013 board book and is available online under tab 6 of this document:
http://laschoolboard.org/sites/default/files/12-10-13RegBdPressPublic.pdf.
Contact Person:
Tony Atienza
Telephone:
213-241-2100
Email:
Tony.Atienza@lausd.net
433
0123456789
TAB 37
Mr. Kayser - Asthma Awareness Month and Task Force (Res-089-13/14)
(Noticed May 20, 2014)
Whereas, Asthma is a major public health problem in the United States; affecting approximately 15
million people, nearly 5 million of whom are under the age of eighteen. People with asthma experience
over 100 million days of restricted activity annually and approximately 5,000 asthma-related deaths
occur each year in this country;
Whereas, It is estimated that more than nine percent of children in the United States currently have the
disease and LAUSDs Nursing Services reports there are 34,983 students with asthma in the District
though this number is likely to double were more thorough identifications done;
Whereas, Increased asthma severity correlates with increased absenteeism and nighttime awakenings in
children with asthma significantly correlate with school absenteeism; the greater the number of nights
awakened, the greater the number of school days missed;
Whereas, Half of all children with asthma under twelve (12) years of age miss at least one day of school
per year; the average number of days missed among this group is five point two (5.2) days and up to
eleven (11) percent of children with asthma attending California schools miss eleven (11) or more days
of school per year due to this medical condition;
Whereas, LAUSD is eager to reduce absenteeism by both students and staff and seeks to minimize the
exposure of students, employees, parents and the community to potentially irritating chemicals;
Whereas, Fumes from cleaning products and their associated fragrances can linger long after they have
been applied, exacerbating asthma symptoms and exposing students and staff to potentially harmful
substances;
Whereas, Multiple agencies focused on health and the environment, such as the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of the Interior, the Responsible Purchasing
Network and the Green Seal Standard for Industrial and Institutional Cleaners have indicated that
fragrances and dyes found in cleaning products are known triggers of asthma attacks and should
therefore be eliminated from public spaces;
Whereas, Both long- or short-term exposure to toxic chemicals or harmful particles, gases, or vapors
can have serious consequences such as asthma, allergies, depression, hormonal changes, or even cancer
while green cleaning products benefit the environment and help protect people, especially vulnerable
populations such as the elderly, the infirm, children, and the chemically-sensitive heir; and
Whereas, May has been declared as Asthma Awareness Month by the Environmental Protection
powered by Legistar
434
0123456789
Agency; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of Los Angeles Unified School District proclaim May as Asthma
Awareness Month; and be it finally
Resolved, That the Superintendent shall form a ninety-day (90) task force comprised, but not limited to
parents, employees, facilities managers, Nursing Services, the Office of Environmental Health and
Safety, and outside asthma specialists to review district operations (maintenance, procurement, etc.) in
order to identify, make recommendations and ultimately eliminate known asthma triggers with a goal of
reducing asthma-related school absences by children and staff in 2014-2015 school year.
powered by Legistar
435
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
436
0123456789
437
0123456789
438
0123456789
TAB 38
Ms. Garca, Mr. Zimmer, Ms. Ratliff - Strengthen Support for Standard English Learners (Res-097-13/14)
Whereas, Language is essential to childrens cognitive and social development, transmits knowledge to
the learner, stimulates understanding and learning and permeates all learning standards;
Whereas, Los Angeles School District (LAUSD) seeks to ensure every student has equitable
opportunities to learn as both a human right and a civil right, and seeks to ensure access to a
linguistically and culturally responsive instruction for equitable access to the curriculum;
Whereas, The language of the school and classroom is Standard English, and every student must
demonstrate mastery and proficiency in all aspects of the English language in order to be college and
career ready upon high school completion;
Whereas, Students face barriers to learning when their language varies from the Academic Standard
English used in classroom discourse and in textbooks, and thus may not always access equitable
opportunities to learn;
Whereas, Building on the strengths of a students first language is the most effective means to develop
proficiency in a second language, a full access to classroom discourse, and to a rigorous curriculum;
Whereas, African American Vernacular English, Mexican American (and other Latino groups) English,
Hawaiian Pidgin English, and Native American English are the languages of a significant number of
students, commonly referred to as Standard English Learners (SEL) in the LAUSD, and identified as
English Only and/or Initially Fluent English Proficient, who demonstrate limited English vocabulary
and syntactical, grammatical and phonological differences indicative of a distinct language group;
Whereas, The LAUSD recognizes that SEL students require unique language development interventions
and programs to ensure full access to the rigorous curriculum of the LAUSD and to learning
opportunities within the context of school;
Whereas, The academic performance of students who are speakers of African American Vernacular
English, Mexican American English, Hawaiian Pidgin English, and Native American English
(Standard English Learners) is lagging behind English Only students who use standard English, and
behind SEL students who receive structured Academic Standard English support;
Whereas, Unequal opportunities to access the curriculum and to learn in the school context contributes
to overrepresentation of African American, Latino, and low-income students whose home language
differs from the Academic Standard English language of schooling in special education, suspensions,
high school drop-out, and overall low academic performance;
powered by Legistar
439
0123456789
Whereas, there are significant numbers of students with various language differences who do not
achieve English Language proficiency by the time they graduate;
Whereas, The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) emphasize complex text and academic language
as essential to educational success in all content areas, and the upcoming integration of the English
Language Arts and English Language Development state framework calls for increased language
support to all students; now, therefore be it
Resolved, That CCSS professional development be infused with linguistically and culturally relevant,
evidence-based strategies to ensure that teachers are able to provide students support in acquiring the
Academic Standard English to enable them to master the cognitive and social expectations of the
Common Core Standards;
Resolved further, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District affirm its
commitment to the Master Plan for English Learners and seeks to implement a systemic, structured, and
research-based model of instruction for SELs modeled after and compatible with the goals of the
Academic English Mastery Program (AEMP) for Standard English Learners (SELs); and be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the
Superintendent to develop a District-wide plan within 3 months for Culturally and Linguistically
Responsive Education to be implemented in the Fall of 2015 which includes the following:
1) Appropriate assessment of the academic language needs of SELs, as
delineated in the Master Plan;
2) Professional development for teachers and administrators regarding best
practices;
3) Targeted resources to support SELs in all schools, including:
a) Researcher/Practitioner service to ensure a quality plan by
i) conducting a review of the research/literature of outcomes in similar
programs around the country which address the needs of this unique
student population and ii) an evaluation component to assess annually
the level and quality of implementation at school sites and progress
made by Standard English Learners in Academic English Language
development and in other content areas; b) Standard English Learner
Teacher Advisor in each Educational Service Center (ESC) by
mid-year of 2014-15;
c) Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Education (CLR)
Fellows;
4) A parent education/engagement component to support learning at home and
at school;
5) A model school to be available in every ESC by the 3rd year of
implementation; and
powered by Legistar
440
0123456789
6) An annual count of SEL students beginning in the 2016-17 school
year.
powered by Legistar
441
0123456789
TAB 39
Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Kayser, Ms. Ratliff - Supporting the Campaign for Biliteracy for All
(Res-098-13/14) (Noticed May 20, 2014)
Whereas, Past and current research has increasingly supported and confirmed the cognitive, social and
economic advantages of bilingualism;
Whereas, Research has consistently shown that bilingual children develop important cognitive processes that
are involved in comprehension and learning;
Whereas, In addition to cognitive benefits for students who are, or become bilingual there are academic,
economic and social advantages for students who graduate from LAUSD bilingual and biliterate;
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has been a leader in the development of dual language
programs, which provide important opportunities for students to achieve academic proficiency in two or more
languages;
Whereas, In February 2013, the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District approved the
resolution Commitment to Prepare Students for a Multilingual Global Economy which reaffirmed the
Districts commitment to the development and expansion of the Dual Language Program as a key instructional
strategy to ensure that all students receive the academic language foundations through instructional pathways
necessary to graduate college and career ready in a global, multilingual, multicultural society and economy;
Whereas, Currently, LAUSD has 54 K-12 dual language programs, including 44 at the elementary level; 35 in
Spanish/English; 6 Korean/English; 3 in Mandarin/English; and 10 at the secondary level; 5 secondary
Spanish/English, 4 Korean/English and 1 Mandarin. Ten of these pathway programs were added in the last
year, evidence of continuing need and interest in these programs;
Whereas, Currently, LAUSD also has 6 Maintenance Bilingual programs, 5 in Spanish and 1 in Korean; and 19
Transitional Bilingual programs, 18 in Spanish and 1 in Korean;
Whereas, In addition to the 10, 288 students that are currently enrolled in Dual Language and transitional
bilingual programs, a total of 3,684 of LAUSD students have graduated with the LAUSD Seal of Biliteracy in
the last 3 years; and an additional 1,486 are expected to receive the Seal this school year. In addition, 809
seniors graduated with the California Department of Education (CDE) State Seal of Biliteracy last year and 851
are expected to receive it this school year;
Whereas, Updated guidance presented to the California Board of Education for teaching English Learners relies
heavily on the value of the students home language as a vehicle for helping a student learn English;
Whereas, State Recognition and Awards Program in Linguistic Biliteracy (AB2303) provides direction and
distinction to Districts that develop multiple instructional pathways to ensure the largest number of students
powered by Legistar
have access to the benefits provided by bilingualism and biliteracy, and requires districts to address; among
other requirements, the integration of English learner services with world language programs, the definition of
the amount of time allotted to language study, the sequencing, and articulation, and inclusion of multiple entry
points into language learning and the inclusion of different needs of groups of pupils; and
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has made significant progress in many of these areas
through the development of the English Learner Master Plan; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District strongly supports Assembly
Bill 2303, introduced by Assembly Member Richard Bloom; and be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the Superintendent to
work with the Office of Legislation to communicate the Districts position to the appropriate committees of the
State Legislature and the Los Angeles delegation.
powered by Legistar
TAB 40
Mr. Zimmer - Elevating the School Report Card for the 2014-15 School Year and Beyond (Res-099-13/14)
Whereas, Los Angeles Unified School District seeks to provide the most accurate information about schools to
parents, families, and school communities;
Whereas, The Academic Performance Index (API) is based almost entirely on the California Standards Test
(CST) which was last administered district-wide in the Spring of 2013 and will not be administered district-
wide in the future;
Whereas, The State of California and LAUSD have devoted significant time and resources towards the
implementation of the Common Core Standards and the Smarter Balanced Testing System;
Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District recognizes that there are many
significant attributes of a school that contribute to student growth and achievement and that cannot be measured
in a standardized test;
Whereas, In 2013, Los Angeles Unified School District along with nine other districts which joined in a
consortium named CORE (California Office of Reform Education) applied for a waiver from federal
accountability requirements, replacing these with the School Quality Improvement System which represents a
more comprehensive range of measures that collectively evaluate students college and career readiness and are
more effective drivers of changes;
Whereas, LAUSD developed and has been using the School Report Card since 2007-08 and has made
important improvements to the Report Card;
Whereas, Awareness of the School Report Card and use of the information contained within the School Report
Card varies widely from school to school;
Whereas, Participation in the School Experience Survey by different groups of stakeholders varies widely, with
student participation reaching 80% while parent participation closer to 30%;
Whereas, LAUSD is piloting the Smarter Balanced testing system in the Spring of 2014 and will administer the
test for the first time district-wide in the Spring of 2015; and
Whereas, the Governing Board of Los Angeles Unified School District has not yet discussed a plan for phasing
in the data resulting from the administration of the Smarter Balanced tests; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That in accordance with all applicable California State Education Code and policies, the Governing
Board of Los Angeles Unified School District will sunset the use of API scores as a measurement and
powered by Legistar
444
0123456789
evaluation tool for schools communities and all other assessment purposes; be it
Resolved further, That at the August or September Regular meeting of the Governing Board of Los Angeles
Unified School District, the Superintendent provide a comprehensive update on the process by which data from
the School Experience Survey and accountability metrics defined through the CORE waiver and other metrics
will be integrated in the School Report Card; and be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the Superintendent to
provide a strategic plan to increase participation in the School Experience Survey by different stakeholder
groups, including collaboration with labor and community partners to define the best indicators and a plan to
expand the dissemination and distribution of the School Report Card.
powered by Legistar
445
0123456789
TAB 41
Mr. Kayser - Urging Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority to Invest More in Active
Transportation Planning and Funding (Res-100-13/14) (Noticed May 20, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority (Metro) is currently working on a draft short
range transportation plan (SRTP) that will guide $88 billion dollars of transportation investments in Los
Angeles County over the next ten years;
Whereas, The modes of transportation used by pedestrians, scooters, skateboarders, rollerbladers, runners
and cyclists fall into a category referred to as Active Transportation;
Whereas, Almost one hundred percent of the Los Angeles Unified School Districts (LAUSD) 650,000
students make daily use of Active Transportation as a means of getting around their communities and to
and from school;
Whereas, Due to drastic budget cuts, the Los Angeles Unified School District closed bus routes and
eliminate services to many children while impoverished students in the San Francisco Unified School
District continue to enjoy entirely free transportation on Bay Area Rapid Transit;
Whereas, A students level of mobility affects the academic, athletic and artistic choices available within
LAUSD, be they Pilot schools, Magnet schools, transfers, schools in Zones of Choice, Options Schools,
Adult Education programs, Occupational Centers, etc.;
Whereas, The Student Integration Office (magnet schools) was forced by budget cuts to eliminate free
transportation for students in elementary schools under two miles and under five miles for middle and
high school students;
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District actively encourages bicycle use by students and
employees and recently celebrated Bike-to-School Day on May 7th, 2014;
Whereas, Currently the short range transportation plan (SRTP) <http://saferoutespartnership.us3.list-
manage.com/track/click?u=88edfd25ae92304f5d305736c&id=64d83d9e9b&e=c8c174d168> does not
provide a clear Active Transportation Finance Strategy and based on analysis of spending levels in other
regions and current cost estimates for active transportation projects, agencies in Los Angeles County will
need to spend approximately $440 million dollars per year to implement their plans for bicycle,
pedestrian, Safe Routes to School and First-Last Mile connections to transit over the next forty-five (45)
years;
Whereas, The SRTP proposes to spend a mere $500 million of the entire ten-year $88.2 billion plan on
Active Transportation, or approximately 0.6 percent;
powered by Legistar
446
0123456789
Whereas, Nineteen percent of all trips in Los Angeles County use Active Transportation modes though
only 0.6 percent of the budget is dedicated to proving services to support Active Transportation;
Whereas, Thirty-nine (39) percent of all roadway fatalities in Los Angeles County are those using Active
Transportation; and
Whereas, The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority is seeking input on its STRP through June 18,
2014; now, therefore, be it finally
Resolved, That on behalf of the approximately 600,000 non-driving children in the Los Angeles Unified
School District and the many employees who commute to serve them, the Governing Board of Los
Angeles Unified School District urges the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority to invest more
resources in Active Transportation planning and funding and to increase support for Safe Routes to
School programs.
powered by Legistar
447
0123456789
TAB 42
Ms. Galatzan, Ms. Ratliff - Agricultural Education Incentives Encourage Inspiring
Outcomes (Res-088-13/14) (Noticed May 13, 2014)
Whereas, Californias reputation for leadership in innovating and expanding agricultural industries has
been made possible through the availability of well-trained and educated personnel;
Whereas, California, being the leading agriculture-producing state for over 60 years, has a compelling
interest in ensuring that its school systems support and promote the continued development of
innovative and well-trained agricultural leaders;
Whereas, The states $4.13 million Agricultural Education Incentive Grant program has been available
to schools since 1983, and provides support for rigorous agricultural education programs;
Whereas, A requirement for matching funds ensures that school districts provide a local investment in
providing education support and resources for students interested in pursuing careers in agriculture;
Whereas, The state provided $27,957 to LAUSD to support agricultural programs in the 2013-2014
school year;
Whereas, The Agricultural Education Incentive Grant program has provided financial incentives for
districts to embark on a systematic and sustained process for improving the delivery and effectiveness
of Agricultural Education throughout California;
Whereas, The Agricultural Education Incentive Grant program provides clear guidance and direction to
school districts in developing and promoting high-quality standards by requiring that programs uphold
15 quality indicators set forth by the state;
Whereas, The non-profit Future Farmers of America, which is supported in our schools through the
Agricultural Education Incentive Grant program, has long proven itself to be an outstanding
organization that promotes excellence in agriculture education;
Whereas, LAUSD has four high schools that currently benefit from the Agricultural Education Incentive
Grant program and related Future Farmers of America activities: Canoga Park, North Hollywood,
Sylmar, and Verdugo Hills;
Whereas, The Agricultural Education Incentive Grant program supports magnet programs at Canoga
Park High School and North Hollywood High School which attract students from all parts of LAUSD
and provide students a career-focused education;
Whereas, The loss of the incentive grant would have a negative impact on all participating LAUSD
schools in ways including but not limited to:
powered by Legistar
448
0123456789
- the inability to provide student membership dues for Future Farmers of America
resulting in lower participation in Career Development Events and leadership workshops
- the inability to send students to educational conferences and support their independent
learning projects
- the inability to provide hands-on learning through campus farms because of a lack of
animal feed and supplies
- the inability to repair and purchase new farm equipment;
Whereas, Participation in the program gives students a small school environment within a larger
comprehensive high school and that offers students a sense of belonging that leads to greater investment
in educational success;
Whereas, Agricultural programs create a support system for some students who may otherwise feel
marginalized such as students at risk of dropping out and special education students;
Whereas, Students in agricultural programs develop important character skills and values such as
responsibility, commitment, and pride in hard work;
Whereas, The existence of agricultural programs supports the LAUSD goal of having 100% of students
graduate college-prepared and career-ready;
Whereas, Governor Brown has proposed folding the Agricultural Incentive Grant into the Local Control
Funding Formula (LCFF), effectively eliminating the incentive for LAUSD to support or fully fund this
program;
Whereas, LAUSD will gain substantially more revenue if the Agricultural Education Incentive Grant is
folded into the Local Control Funding Formula;
Whereas, The California Legislature has rejected Governor Browns plan to fold the Agricultural
Education Incentive Grant into LCFF, instead encouraging him to preserve the existing program; now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District will preserve funding
for the Agriculture programs at Canoga Park, North Hollywood, Sylmar, and Verdugo Hills for the
2014-2015 school year and beyond at levels that equal or exceed the current total amounts, either
through the ongoing state grant or new LCFF model.
powered by Legistar
449
0123456789
TAB 43
Ms. Ratliff - Resolution in Support of Safe and Clean Schools (Res-090-13/14)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District is dedicated to providing a safe and inclusive
learning environment for all students;
Whereas, Student achievement begins with a safe and healthy school and classroom environment that is
conducive to learning and free from disruption;
Whereas, The Superintendent has presented a draft budget for the fiscal years 2014-15, 2015-16 and
2016-17 (the Proposed Budget);
Whereas, The LAUSD added over 60 school sites since the 2007/08 school year on over 400 acres
spread across the District and underwent a 24% increase in square footage, without a commensurate
increase in Los Angeles School Police (the LASPD) officers and other resources to patrol such
schools;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget includes no material changes from the $57.7 million of annual funding
(including $13.02 million of supplemental and concentration funds) for the LASPD seen in the 2013/14
school year;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget, without clear explanation, includes widely varying proportions of
certain divisions budgets (e.g. 26.4% of Psychologists, 22.8% of Campus Aides, 22.6% of School
Police, 30.7% of Special Education and 65.3% of Options Program) under Supplemental concentration
funding, which is targeted to English Learners, low-income students and foster children;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget accounts for other items, such as After School Programs, Cafeteria,
Campus Aides, Counselors, GATE, School Readiness Language Development Program and
Transportation solely under Base Funding, even though English Learners, low-income students and
foster children are being served by those programs;
Whereas, Break-ins during off-hours including evenings, early mornings, weekends and school
vacations incur costly damages and losses for the LAUSD;
Whereas, The Board has committed to providing schools with increased technology at the school sites
worth millions of dollars and hopes to eventually send such technology home with our students;
Whereas, Conventional wisdom suggests that more officers and/or other resources deployed by the
LASPD in a property protection capacity and providing safe passages for our students as they come and
powered by Legistar
450
0123456789
go from school can reduce harm to our students and reduce LAUSDs losses due to break-ins and
vandalism;
Whereas, On May 14, 2013, the Los Angeles Unified School District adopted the School Discipline
Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights Resolution that, among other things: promotes alternatives to
school suspensions; requires the implementation of restorative justice practices at schools; builds upon
the Los Angeles Unified School District's implementation of the School-Wide Positive Behavior
Interventions and Supports aimed at reducing suspensions, increasing attendance and improving test
scores; and defines the role of police on school campuses;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget allots $0.66 million for 5 full-time equivalent (FTE) Restorative
Justice Counselors and $2.0 to $5.0 million to unspecified School Climate & Restorative Justice
purposes;
Whereas, Community input suggests that the proposed Restorative Justice resources are woefully
inadequate for a school district of well over half a million students spread across hundreds of school
campuses;
Whereas, Research suggests that restorative justice principles must be consistently applied, and
restorative justice practitioners must be an enduring force for a school-based program to be successful;
Whereas, In order to implement the rollout of Phase 3 of the Common Core Technology Project, the
Proposed Budget earmarks $8.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of Supplemental concentration
funding for Instructional Technology Support (VLC) and School Technology Support (MCSA and,
together with VLC, collectively Technology Support) for the 2014/15 school year;
Whereas, The Governing Board has authorized Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 1L of the Common Core
Technology Project, which have been reflected in the 2013/14 budget, but has not authorized
proceeding with Phase 3 of the Common Core Technology Project at this time, although the Governing
Board remains committed to access to 21
st
Century learning for all;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget also clearly earmarks $6.6 million of Base Funding for Technology
Support for the 2014/15 school year;
Whereas, LAUSD Facilities Maintenance and Operations (FM&O) reports that, since the 2007/08
school year, the average custodial hours at LAUSDs Elementary, Middle and High Schools have been
reduced by 29%, 50% and 44%, respectively, and the corresponding custodial supply allotments have
been reduced by 24%, 50% and 54%;
Whereas, The Proposed Budget restores only 59 out of the 1,370 custodial positions that FM&O has
stated are needed to fulfill custodial standards, and the Proposed Budget makes no increase whatsoever
to the custodial supply allotment, which FM&O has stated should be increased by $1.7 million to
achieve such standards;
Whereas, The LAUSDs Breakfast in the Classrooms (BIC) initiative has created even more custodial
needs - by way of example, BIC training calls for waste milk to be poured down classroom sinks where
available, and the current custodial allotment results in classroom sinks being cleaned only weekly or as
time allows;
powered by Legistar
451
0123456789
Whereas, BIC is scheduled to expand to every school in the District that does not opt out by the end of
the 2014/15 school year;
Whereas, Research has shown a correlation between clean schools and student academic achievement;
and
Whereas, Research shows that more frequent cleaning of schools can result in lower absenteeism from
gastrointestinal and respiratory illness; now, therefore be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District reaffirms its
commitment to providing a high-quality education and safe and well-maintained school facilities that
encourage learning;
Resolved further, That the Board instructs the Superintendent to supervise the development of a report
that presents funding requirements for ideal LASPD deployment and other resources for property
protection and safe passages activities. Such report shall be delivered to the Governing Board a
reasonable time prior to the Governing Boards vote on the Final Budget for the 2014/15 school year, so
the Board can determine whether increased funding for the LASPD and or other property protection
measures are warranted; and be it
Resolved further, That the Board instructs the Superintendent to accurately apply a consistent and
appropriate algorithm across all divisions in determining what portion of budgeted expenditures are
accounted for under Base Funding and what portion of budgeted expenditures are accounted for under
Supplemental/concentration funding;
Resolved further, That the Board instructs the Superintendent to revise the Proposed Budget to
consistently account under Base Funding and/or Supplemental/concentration funding, for the relevant
portions of appropriate line items including, without limitation, LASPD, After School Programs,
Cafeteria, Campus Aides, Counselors, GATE, School Readiness Language Development Program and
Transportation;
Resolved further, That the Proposed Budget be revised, to the extent allowed by law, to spend $6.51
million of the $16.4 million of Supplemental/concentration funding and/or Base Funding currently
earmarked for Technology Support for the 2014/15 school year, on increasing the number of custodial
positions by 108 FTEs, so that the number of FTE custodial positions added in the 2014/15 school year
will be increased from 25 to 133, with deployment concentrated in the areas of greatest need;
Resolved, further That the Board commends the Superintendent for planning to establish, during the
2014/15 school year, 18 school climate and restorative justice related demonstration sites at secondary
schools (across ESCs) that are identified based on OCR target schools with disproportionate suspension
of African American students and students with disability; and be it
Resolved, further That the School Climate & Restorative Justice line item of the Proposed Budget be
revised to reflect the Los Angeles Unified School District School Operations Proposed Budget for the
Discipline Foundation Policy with respect to the 2014/15 school year and to clarify what will comprise
this line item in the 2015/16 and 2016/17 school years; and be it
powered by Legistar
452
0123456789
Resolved, further, That the Proposed Budget be revised, to the extent allowed by law, to spend $1.29
million of the $16.4 million of Supplemental/concentration funding and/or Base Funding currently
earmarked for Technology Support for the 2014/15 school year on additional professional development
in School Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (the SWPBIS) including SWPBIS
coaches, Restorative Practices, and other trauma-informed and social emotional learning strategies that
are research-based for the 18 demonstration secondary sites; and be it
Resolved further, That the Board acknowledges that having only 18 demonstration secondary sites with
dedicated Restorative Justice Counselors and targeted SWPBIS are insufficient resources to fully
implement our commitment to the School Climate Bill of Rights Resolution, but is a decent first step;
and be it finally
Resolved, That the Proposed Budget be revised, to the extent allowed by law, to allocate $8.6 million of
the $16.4 million of Supplemental/concentration funding and/or Base Funding currently earmarked for
Technology Support for the 2014/15 school year to a rainy day fund to cover initiatives or
augmentations to be approved by the Governing Board in the future, which may or may not include
Technology Support.
powered by Legistar
453
0123456789
TAB 44
Ms. Garca, Dr. Vladovic, Mr. Zimmer - Equity is Justice Resolution (Res-091-13/14)
Whereas, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is committed to a goal of 100% graduation
rate for all students regardless of where they live or what school they attend;
Whereas, the fight for equity and access for all students in LAUSD is an over decade-long effort led by
a communitys call to action to demand better academic outcomes;
Whereas, due to the increase in revenues generated by the voter approved Proposition 30 and the state
approved groundbreaking Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), all LAUSD schools will receive an
increase in base budget, and are expected to continue to gain more dollars each year for the next seven
years;
Whereas, LAUSD has a momentous opportunity to close the achievement gap for high need, low-
income students within the district;
Whereas, Governor Brown boldly reminds California of the spirit and intent of the LCFF by stating that
equal treatment for children in unequal situations is not justice;
Whereas, LCFF sets forth a new equity-based vision for funding school districts determined on need,
where school districts with higher numbers of English learners, foster youth, and low-income youth
receive additional supplemental and concentration grants to mitigate the harmful effects of
disadvantage;
Whereas, the Superintendent projects an estimated $837 million in supplemental and concentration
grants for high need students;
Whereas, LAUSD has a historic opportunity to develop bold investments that reflect the spirit and intent
of LCFF by ensuring that the supplemental and concentration dollars target its high and highest need
schools first;
Whereas, LAUSD also has a historic opportunity to take a fuller, more comprehensive look into the
impediments of academic achievement within its district by taking into account environmental factors
that create barriers to achievement;
Whereas, under the LCFF notion of subsidiarity, Advancement Project, Community Coalition, and
InnerCity Struggle, have developed and researched an equity-based student need distribution of funds
that take into account academic, health, and safety variables to rigorously and comprehensively assess
need locally;
powered by Legistar
454
0123456789
Whereas, by taking a comprehensive approach to LCFF investment and using a student need index to
inform the allocation of funds, LAUSD can effectively address the achievement gap problem, set a new
standard for embodying the spirit of LCFF legislation, and reduce the need for costly and inefficient
remedial actions; now, therefore be it
Superintendent to construct and adopt an equity-based student need index as the means for identifying
high and highest need schools in LAUSD for the distribution of funds and use the Aggregate Student
Need Index as the foundation for this work.
powered by Legistar
455
0123456789
TAB 45
Ms. Garca - Reaffirming our Commitment to High Quality Parent Engagement at Every
School (Res-092-13/14) (Noticed May 13, 2014)
Whereas, the Los Angeles Unified School District is committed to achieving 100% graduation rate;
Whereas the Board of Education adopted the Parents as Equal Partners in the Education of their
Children Resolution in December of 2010 to affirm and delineate the vision, practice and commitment
to engage parents in their childrens education, and
Whereas, the Parent Bill of Rights and Responsibilities was subsequently adopted by the Board of
Education to ensure school staff welcome parents as equal partners and value school-home partnerships
as essential to student learning and achievement, and
Whereas, the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) includes parent involvement as one of 8
key priorities for District-wide improvement in student achievement and learning leading to high school
completion and college preparedness, and
Whereas, parents have a participatory role in the new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), and in
advising the development of the corresponding LCAP to support all students, including low- income
students, foster youth, and English Learners, and
Whereas increased funding is available under LCFF for schools to improve outreach, engagement and
education strategies that strengthen capacity of both parents and staff to be mutually supportive as equal
partners to promote learning and achievement, and
Whereas, the School Experience Survey (SES) measures among other things, the degree to which
parents indicate they are welcomed in their schools and treated respectfully by school staff, and whether
opportunities are provided to parents to strengthen their capacity to support education;
Whereas, LAUSD parents and guardians, and community based organizations, in partnership with the
United Way of Greater Los Angeles, conducted school visits and surveys to assess how parents and
guardians are treated at LAUSD schools;
Whereas, their findings concluded that parent resources, such as the School Report Cards (SRC) were
not equally available across the district, nor was there a designated staff person available at each
campus that focused exclusively on parent engagement; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That schools utilize new and existing funds to implement a parent engagement action plan
that 1) ensures all parents know and understand their rights and responsibilities, 2) provides trainings
powered by Legistar
456
0123456789
and resources to help parents support learning at home and at school, 3) offers capacity-building
opportunities for teachers and other school staff to strengthen school/home partnership, 4) promotes
effective partnerships between school staff and parents as equal partners, 5) requires each school to
deliver four parent training modules on academic initiatives, 6) requires each school to identify at least
one certificated staff member to work with Parent Center staff in supporting parent engagement
activities 7) ensures each school has a central location for parent communication and distribution of
report cards and other parent resources
Resolved further, That the School Site Council receive training on research and best practices in the
field of parent engagement to ensure strong school-family partnerships that support student learning and
development;
Resolved further, That the District measure how well schools respect and honor the Parent Bill of
Rights and Responsibilities through the annual School Experience Survey (SES) in order to track the
effectiveness of school/home partnerships that promote learning and achievement of students,
Resolved further, That the Superintendent make public the results of the annual School Experience
Survey and utilize this information to improve school performance on the LAUSD Performance Meter;
Resolved further, That the Superintendent include in the performance evaluation of site administrators
the degree to which all accountabilities in the parent engagement action plan are completed; and be it
finally
Resolved, That the Superintendent explore the opportunities for the District to offer school
identification cards to parents so that they may be readily identifiable as their schools partner and their
childs advocate.
powered by Legistar
457
0123456789
TAB 46
Ms. Garca, Dr. Vladovic, Ms. Ratliff - Celebrating Safe Spaces for All and Declare June as Pride Month (Res-
096-13/14) (Noticed May 13, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has a mission to reach 100% graduation rate for all
students;
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District (the District) models, advocates and promotes the
safe and respectful treatment of all our members;
Whereas, The Month of June is an opportunity to celebrate the identities and contributions of Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) community;
Whereas, Sexual orientation and gender expression-biased bullying is among the most common forms
of harassment in schools;
Whereas, The FAIR Education Act of 2012 calls for positive inclusion of the contributions of Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Americans in social studies curriculum;
Whereas, The Student Success and Opportunity Act of 2013 strengthened already existing protections
for transgender students and affirmed that all students should be recognized by, and participate in
activities, by their gender of identity;
Whereas, School-dropout rates for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ)
students is up to triple the national rate of non-LGBT students, due to peer harassment and bullying;
Whereas, Children who do not conform to gender stereotypes are more likely to be targets of
harassment;
Whereas, No one should ever be the target of harassment or violence;
Whereas, School Safety is one of the Districts most important goals;
Whereas, We must strive to ensure that District schools are consistently safe and affirming spaces for all
students and their families;
Whereas, Human Relations, Diversity and Equity is a resource for trainings, activities, lessons and
service-learning projects for and about LGBTQ concerns and is committed to fostering a safe and
respectful District, school and community culture;
Whereas, In October 2013 the OUT for Safe Schools campaign was launched encouraging 30,000
powered by Legistar
458
0123456789
school staff to wear an OUT for Safe Schools badge making them visible allies and safe spaces for all
youth;
Whereas, Project 10 is a District program that oversees education and support services for LGBTQ
students, in order to ensure safe, supportive and welcoming campuses free from discrimination and
harassment for LGBTQ students;
Whereas, The District and the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center formed an initiative, Project SPIN (Suicide
Prevention Intervention Now), to bring systemic efforts to celebrate and support LGBTQ students,
families, and staff;
Whereas, Affirming school and home environments substantially reduce the risks of negative mental
health and school drop out for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students;
,
Whereas, By recognizing Pride Month, we support policies, practices and curriculum that honor and
respect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students and their families; and
Whereas, By recognizing Pride Month we reaffirm our commitment to the 1988 Districts Resolution
for the Respectful Treatment of All Persons; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District declares June 2014 as
Pride Month and directs the Superintendent and all District staff to support lessons and activities that
engage students in meaningful learning, research and writing about our lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender students and families policies, practices and curricula that respect lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender students and their families in June and throughout the school year.
powered by Legistar
459
0123456789
TAB 47
Mr. Kayser -Reaffirming Our Commitment to Early Education through the Local Control Funding
Formula and an Improved Economic Climate in the Los Angeles Unified School District (Res-101-
13/14) (For Action June 17, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District is committed to providing every student with a
quality education in a safe, caring environment and ensuring that every student will graduate college-
prepared and career ready;
Whereas, To ensure that all children are on the path to college and career readiness, we must lay the
foundation early, investing additional resources in early education, to prepare them for kindergarten and
building on their progress in elementary, middle, and high school;
Whereas, Economists Rob Grunewald and Arthur J. Rolnick from The Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis researched several studies of model programs and, when considering the Perry Preschool
program, found a return on investment of 16 percent, with 80 percent of the benefits going to the
general public. The data about model programs-such as Perry Preschool showed that it yielded more
than $8 for every $1 invested. This rate of return clearly shows the benefits of investing in early
education compared to other investments;
Whereas, A childs early language environment plays a critical role in his or her listening and spoken
language development. For children born into poverty, there is a well-documented inequity in their early
language experience. By age three, disadvantaged children have heard approximately thirty million
fewer words than their more affluent counterparts. Without early education programs, children growing
up in low-income households lose ground to their middle-class peers, starting school behind and that
gap only widens as they advance through elementary school;
Whereas, In the early years of a childs life, young children have the ability to develop core academic
knowledge in pre-literacy and early math, while also developing important learning skills, such as
paying attention, managing emotions and completing tasks. Several studies, such as the High Scope
Perry Preschool Study, the Abecedarian Project, and the Chicago Child-Parent Center Education
Program, in the U.S. alone, show that quality preschool significantly benefits childrens school success
and strengthens confidence and parenting skills of families with young children;
Whereas, The Harvard Family Research Project reaffirms the positive impact of home-school
relationships between families and schools with respect to achieving desirable outcomes for children in
the early years and also show these benefits to persist over time;
Whereas, Students were more likely to reach advanced or proficient levels on the states annual 3rd
grade assessment than those who did not attend Denver Public Preschool (64% vs 58%), and less likely
to score at unsatisfactory levels (13% vs. 19%).
powered by Legistar
460
0123456789
Whereas, Students were three-fourths of a year ahead of their peers in math, and two-thirds of a year
ahead in literacy by 5th grade, scoring higher on state assessments than those who did not attend the
New Jersey Abbott Preschool program;
Whereas, Students who participated in the Michigan Great Start Readiness Program were more likely to
graduate on time from high school, 58% vs. 43%, and in particularly, children of color, 60% vs. 37%;
Whereas, the Chicago Public School Child-Parent Center Program led to a 29% increase in high school
graduation by age 20;
Whereas, More than 9 out of 10 kindergarten teachers in California say it is important for children to
have access to quality early education before they start kindergarten, according to a statewide poll of
California public school kindergarten teachers;
Whereas, Low-income students who attended San Mateo Countys Preschool for All program in the
Redwood City School District for two years outperformed more well-off children who did not attend.
By 2nd grade, 74% of those attending the program for two years were proficient in reading, compared
to 55% of those who did not attend, and 62% who attended were proficient in math, compared to 50%;
Whereas, The Local Control Funding Formula, provides equitable, increased funding for the Los
Angeles Unified School District as it has high concentrations of low-income students, students
classified as English Learners, and students in foster care, allowing The District to invest these new
funds by selecting from state-identified priority areas such as student achievement and parent
engagement, outcomes of which can be achieved starting by investing in early education;
Whereas, The funds generated by the Local Control Funding Formula, the Los Angeles Unified School
District can prevent the school readiness gap and better prepare more of its youngest students starting
from early education to read proficiently by 3
rd
grade; creating an opportunity to create budgets that
utilize resources in a way that is both equitable and outcomes driven;
Whereas, The Districts adoption of Common Core places a higher emphasis on being ready for school
upon entering kindergarten, making access to high-quality early education for LAUSD students even
more critical;
Whereas, The early elementary grades are when children learn to understand foundation math, reading,
and reasoning skills that allow them to tackle more complex subjects in third grade and beyond;
Whereas, There is an increasing number of English Learners under the age of five in our community
and there is also a growing body of research indicating the ability of young children to learn more than
one language in a supportive environment and that acquiring more than one language in the early years
increases brain development and promotes academic achievement;
Whereas, Only 7% of 3
rd
grade English Learners in the Los Angeles Unified School District are
proficient or advanced in English Language Arts per the California STARS 2013 test results. Investing
in early education can remedy this by ensuring that the youngest students in the Los Angeles Unified
School District are prepared to learn and ready to succeed;
Whereas, Research shows that students who start out behind too often stay behind and those who are not
powered by Legistar
461
0123456789
reading proficiently in 3rd grade are four times more likely to not graduate from high school;
Whereas, in addition to the Local Control Funding Formula, improvements in the economy in California
make it so that the Los Angeles Unified School District has more resources available to invest in
strategies to improve outcomes in comparison to previous years, especially during 2008-2012; now
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District reaffirms its
commitment to its youngest learners by investing an additional $10 million in 2014-2015 to the Early
Education Division, $14 million in 2015-2016, and $20 million in 2016-2017, pursuant to the timeframe
of the Local Control Funding Formula and its corresponding Local Control Accountability Plan. This
additional $10 million can be used to support expanding access, improving quality by way of providing
parent education where appropriate, and providing early mental and physical health screenings where
possible;
Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to charge the Early Education Division to
identify and prioritize those early education sites (inclusive of the School Readiness and Language
Development Programs and Early Education Centers), that would most benefit from additional
resources based on criteria including, but not limited to:
Highest need elementary schools based on 3
rd
grade reading scores and their respective
proximity to a District early education site;
Elementary schools with high-concentrations of English Learners and children in foster
care and their respective proximity to a District early education site;
Highest need communities within the Los Angeles Unified School District boundaries as
demonstrated by hot-zones, persistent wait lists, and other measures the District deems
appropriate; and be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District request that the
Superintendent, the Early Education Division, and community stakeholders as appropriate, come
together to develop the specific plan for how additional resources in the amount of $10 million will be
allocated for early education, upon adoption of the final 2014-2015 budget in June.
powered by Legistar
462
0123456789
TAB 48
Mr. Kayser- Reappointment of Mr. Stuart Magruder to the School Construction Bond Oversight Committee
(Res-102-13/14) (For Action June 17, 2014)
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District reappoints Mr. Stuart
Magruder, representing the American Institute of Architects, as Member to the School Construction Bond
Oversight Committee for a two-year term commencing immediately. The Board determines that Mr. Magruder
is not an employee, official, vendor, contractor, or consultant of the District.
powered by Legistar
463
0123456789
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
464
0123456789
465
0123456789
466
0123456789
TAB 49
File #: 13/14-0090, Version: 1
Resolution authorizing the Execution of Deed of Dedication of an Easement at the Gardena High School Workforce
Housing and Joint Amenities Project for utility line access.
powered by Legistar
467
0123456789
468
0123456789
469
0123456789
470
0123456789
471
0123456789
TAB 50
File #: 13/14-0091, Version: 1
Collegiate Charter High School of Los Angeles
Consideration of the level of support for a charter petition requesting a 5-year term to serve 456
students in grades 9-12 with a proposed location in the Boyle Heights and East Los Angeles area of Los
Angeles.
powered by Legistar
472
0123456789
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
C
H
A
R
T
E
R

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
(
C
S
D
)
1
o
f

1
L
I
S
T

O
F

N
E
W

C
H
A
R
T
E
R

P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
S

F
O
R

P
U
B
L
I
C

H
E
A
R
I
N
G
B
O
A
R
D

O
F

E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N

M
E
E
T
I
N
G

J
U
N
E

1
0
,

2
0
1
4
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N

N
A
M
E

T
Y
P
E
C
S
D

T
E
A
M
A
S
S
I
G
N
M
E
N
T
B
D
E
S
C
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

A
R
E
A
/
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
G
R
A
D
E

L
E
V
E
L
S
#

O
F

S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S
T
E
R
M
1
.
C
o
l
l
e
g
i
a
t
e

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
i
g
h

S
c
h
o
o
l

o
f

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
S
t
a
r
t
-
u
p

I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
2
E
B
o
y
l
e

H
e
i
g
h
t
s
/
E
a
s
t

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
9
-
1
2
4
5
6
2
0
1
5
-
2
0
473
0123456789
TAB 51
File #: 13/14-0086, Version: 1
Report of Correspondence
powered by Legistar
474
0123456789
REPORT OF CORRESPONDENCE - 1 - JUNE 10, 2014
v2

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District
JUNE 10, 2014
REPORT OF CORRESPONDENCE

The following correspondence addressed to the Board of Education is submitted with the recommended
Disposition, Refer to Superintendent for referral to Office of the General Counsel to take all steps
necessary to protect the interests of the Board of Education, including assignment to outside counsel;
Controller to draw warrants in such amounts as may be necessary for the payment of costs and fees upon
invoices as approved by the Office of the General Counsel:

FROM LEGAL ACTION

1. Center for Disability Access Summons and Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages for
Violation of: 1) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act,
42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.; 2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act, 29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.; and 3) Disabled Persons Act, Cal.
Govt Code 54 et seq. Case No. CV14-3029 JAK-PJWx; United
States District Court of the State of California. Gary Scherer,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1
Through 10, Inclusive, Defendants.

2. Dynasty Legal Group Summons and Complaint for Damages. Case No. 2:14-cv-01731;
United States District Court of the State of California.
Anthony Belardino, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School
District; and Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive, Defendants.
3. Michael N. Feuer
Thomas H. Peters
Honey A. Lewis

Summons and Cross-Complaint for: 1) Apportionment of Fault;
2) Indemnification; 3) Declaratory Relief. Case No. BC 535701;
Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of California. City of Los
Angeles, Cross-Complainant, v. Los Angeles Unified School
District; and Roes 1 Through 50, Cross-Defendants.

4. Fraley & Associates Notice by: PRP Name; Los Angeles Unified School District PRP
ID No. 388 of Appearance in Lawsuit; and 2) Waiver of Service of
Summons. Per Case Management Order No. 3 Entered
2014-01-17, Docket No. 821. Seventh Amended Complaint by
Rev 973, LLC. Order Appointing Successor Special Master. Case
No. C98-10690 DSF (Ex); United States District Court of the State
of California. Rev 973, LLC, a California limited liability
company, Plaintiff, v. John Mouren-Laurens, an individual; et al.,
Defendants; and Related Counter-Cross, and Thrid-Party Claims.

5. Ronald C. Lapekas Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate. Case No. BS 148833; Los
Angeles Superior Court of the State of California. Glory Rangel,
Petitioner, v. Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School
District, Respondent.

475
0123456789
v2

6. Ronald C. Lapekas Petition for Writ of Mandate and for Declaratory Judgment
(CCP 1085, 1094.5, 1060, et seq.) Notice of Errata: Petition for
Writ of Mandate and for Declaratory Judgment. Case No.
BS 148400; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of California.
James Hill, Petitioner, v. Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District; and Commission on Professional
Competence, Respondents.

7. The Law Offices of Victor
Jacobovitz
Summons and Complaint for: 1) Negligence; 2) Wrongful
Termination - Hostile Work Environment; 3) Intentional Infliction
of Emotional Distress; 4) Violation of the Fair Employment and
Housing Act, Cal. Gov. Code 12940, et . seq. Case No.
BC 540999; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of California.
Holly Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
California public entity of unknown formation; West Valley
Occupational Center, a California company of unknown formation;
Louis Lopez, an individual; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

8. Law Offices of Bernard R.
Schwam
Summons and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.
Case No. BC 538369; Superior Court of the State of California.
Cecille Zarsky, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified
School District; Los Angeles Unified School District, Division of
Risk Management and Insurance Services, Benefits Administration;
California State Teachers Retirement System; and Does 1 Through
100, Inclusive, Defendants.

9. Law Offices Timothy J. Kodani Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Negligence;
2) Conscious and or Reckless Disregard; 3) Assault; 4) Battery;
5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 6) Negligent
Hiring, Supervision, and Retention; 7) Punitive Damages. Case
No. BC 536385; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of
California. Brian Cruz, a minor, by and through his Parent and
natural Guardian Ad Litem, Jaime Cruz; Hidie Esparza, a minor, by
and through her Parent and natural Guardian Ad Litem, Karina
Esparza; Emily D. Flores, a minor, by and through her Parent and
natural Guardian Ad litem, Edgar Flores; Betzy Jimenez, a minor,
by and through her Parent and natural Guardian Ad Litem, Esaul
Jimenez; Jeisma Mercado, a minor, by and through her Parent and
Natural Guardian Ad Litem, Cristina Mercado; Esli Oasis Ortega-
Martinez, a minor, by and through her Parent and natural Guardian
Ad Litem, Rode America Ortega-Martinez; and Kevin Ramirez, a
minor, by and through his Parent and natural Guardian Ad Litem,
Irma Delia Ramirez-Escalante, Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified
School District, a public entity; Editha Ragonjan, an adult
individual; and Does 1 Through 100, Defendants.

476
0123456789
v2

10. Otten & Joyce Summons and Complaint for: 1) Discrimination in Violation of
FEHA; 2) Harassment, Hostile Work Environment;
3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 4) Unlawful,
Unfair, Fraudulent Activity. Case No. BC 540428; Los Angeles
Superior Court of the State of California. Lynne Simich, an
individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
public entity; David Gonzalez, an individual; and Does 1 Through

11. Otten & Joyce Summons and Complaint for: 1) Discrimination in Violation of
FEHA; 2) Harassment, Hostile Work Environment; 3) Sexual
Harassment; 4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress;
5) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; 6) Unlawful,
Unfair, Fraudulent Activity. Case No. BC 540427; Los Angeles
Superior Court of the State of California. Bridget Smith, an
individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
public entity; David Gonzalez, an individual; and Does 1 Through

12. Hunt Ortmann Palffy
Nieves Darling & Mah, Inc
Summons and Complaint for: 1) Breach of Contract; 2) Open
Book Account; 3) Account Stated; 4) Reasonable Value of Labor
and Materials Furnished; 5) Money Due on Statutory Labor and
Material Bond on Public Work; and 6) Enforcement of Stop
Payment Notice. Case No. BC 542075; Los Angeles Superior
Court of the State of California. First Fire Systems, Inc., a
California corporation, Plaintiff, v. Vector Resources, Inc., dba
Vectorusa, a California corporation; Los Angeles Unified School
District, a public entity; and Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive,
Defendant.

13. Petra Ann Parker Summons and Complaint for Discrimination in Employ Practices.
Case No. CV14-00177 SJO(RZx); United States District Court of
the State of California. Petra Ann Parker, Plaintiffs, v. Academic
Advantage; Youth Policy Institute; Los Angeles Unified School
District, Defendants.

14. Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate; and Memorandum of Points
and Authorities in Support Thereof. Case No. BS 148155; Los
Angeles Superior Court of the State of California. Tad Rasmussen,
Petitioner, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1

477
0123456789
v2

The recommended disposition of the following item is Refer to Superintendent for referral to the
Office of the Risk Management and Insurance Services:
15. Bergkvist, Bergkvist & Carter Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 542764; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Sandra
Forte, Guardian Ad Litem for minor Khamery Forte, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a governmental entity; Baldwin
Hills Elementary; Kimwanae Baldwin; and Does 1 Through 25,
Inclusive, Defendants.

16. Brown, Brown & Brown Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 544052; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Karen
Spinosa, Plaintiff, v. City of Los Angeles; Los Angeles Unified
School District; Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; and
Does 1 Through 100, Defendants.

17. Kaloustian & Associates Summons and Complaint: Personal Liability; Personal Injury.
Case No. BC 526453; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the
State of California. Bruce Hulse, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified
School District; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

18. Law Office of Bryman &
Apelian
Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Negligence;
2) Negligent Hiring, and Retention; 3) Assault and Battery;
4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 5) Negligent
Infliction of Emotional Distress; 6) Violation of Civil Rights. Case
No. BC 541327; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of
California. Gregory Hunter Knight, a minor, by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem, Kristen Knight and Kristen Knight, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District; Lucia Arias; and Does 1

19. Law Office of Marilyn M. Smith
The Torgow Law Firm
Summons and First Amended Complaint: 1) Negligence, Failure to
Protect; 2) Negligent Hiring, Supervision; 3) Negligence Per Se;
4) Violation of Civil Rights; 5) Violation of Right of Privacy;
6) Breach of Contract; 7) Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and
Fair Dealing; 8) Deceit; 9) Conspiracy; 10) Negligent Infliction
of Emotional Distress; 11) Intentional Infliction of Emotional
Distress. Case No. BC 533028; Los Angeles County Superior Court
of the State of California. Jane Doe, a minor, by and through her
Guardian Ad Litem, Cathy Green, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a California public school district;
Judith Hernandez, individually, and in her official capacity as
Principal of Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; Mari Ann
Aguilar, individually, and in her official capacity as Vice Principal of
Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; Daniel Steiner,
individually, and in his official capacity as Assistant Vice Principal
of Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; Julie Brard,
individually, and in her official capacity as Counselor of Sherman
Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; Catalina Hwang, individually, and
in her official capacity as Vice Principal of Sherman Oaks Center for
478
0123456789
v2

Enriched; Samuel Shultz, individually and in his official capacity as a
certificated teacher at Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies;
Karen Miller, individually, and in her official capacity as Operations
Coordinator of Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; Ruben
Bonham, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the
security force at Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies; and
Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.

20. Law Offices of Luis A. Carrillo Summons and Complaint for Damages for: 1) Negligence,
Negligent Supervision, Negligent Hiring and Retention, Negligent
Failure to Warn Train or Educate; 2) Sexual Harassment. Case No.
BC 540214; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of
California. J.G., a minor, by her Guardian Jose Gonzalez; R.J., a
minor by her Guardian Angelica Mora, Alonso DOE, an individual,
v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a public entity and Does 1

21. Law Offices of Garrotto &
Garrotto
Summons and Complaint For: 1) Negligent Supervision;
2) Negligence, Special Relationship; 3) Assault and Battery;
4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 5) Statutory
Liability (Civ. Code 1714.1) Case No. BC 541840; Los Angeles
County Superior Court of the State of California. B.W., a minor, by
and through her Guardian Ad litem, Jessyca Harper, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a public entity; Caleb Elliott; and
Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive, Defendants.

22. Law Offices of Daniel A.
Gibalevich
Summons and First Amended Complaint For Damages from Personal
Injuries Based Upon Cal. Gov. Code 835. Case No. BC 528914;
Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California.
Abraham Jauregui, a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem,
Maria Gonzalez, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;
and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

23. Law Offices of Vatche D.
Tashjian
Summons and Complaint for Damages. Case No. BC516196; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Efreida
Hardie, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a public
entity; LA Junior Chamber of Commerce; and Does 1 Through 20,
Inclusive, Defendants.

24. Manly, Stewart & Finaldi
The Senators Firm
Summons and Complaint for Damages for: 1) Negligence,
Negligent Supervision, Negligent Hiring and or Retention, Negligent
Failure to Warn Train or Educate; 2) Constructive Fraud
(C.C. 1573); 3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress;
4) Sexual Harassment (C.C. 51.9); and 5) Breach of Fiduciary
Duty. Case No. BC 528523; Los Angeles County Superior Court of
the State of California. Jane YB Doe, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; Mnica Garca; Marguerite
Poindexter-LaMotte; Tamar Galatzan; Steve Zimmer; Bennett
Kayser; Nury Martinez; Richard Vladovic; Martin Sandoval; Richard
Lopez; and Does 1 Through 20, Defendants.
479
0123456789
v2

The Senators Firm
Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Constructive Fraud
3) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; and 4) Breach of
Fiduciary Duty. Case No. BC 528524; Los Angeles County Superior
Court of the State of California. Reina Rodas; Herodis Dominguez;
Pamucena Olmedo; and Mario Reyes, Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles
Unified School District; Mnica Garca; Marguerite Poindexter-
LaMotte; Tamar Galatzan; Steve Zimmer; Bennett Kayser; Nury
Martinez; Richard Vladovic; Martin Sandoval; Richard Lopez; and
Does 1 Through 20, Defendants.

The Senators Firm
Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Cosntructive Fraud
3) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; and 4) Breach of
Fiduciary Duty. Case No. BC 528525; Los Angeles County Superior
Court of the State of California. Pilar Sanchez Galban; and Pedor
Yac Rodas, Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;
Mnica Garca; Marguerite Poindexter-LaMotte; Tamar Galatzan;
Steve Zimmer; Bennett Kayser; Nury Martinez; Richard Vladovic;
Martin Sandoval; Richard Lopez; and Does 1 Through 20,
Defendants.

27. Ochs Law Firm Summons and Complaint and Jury Demand. Case No. BC 539402;
Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California.
Nanette Johnson, as Guardian Ad Litem for BJ, a minor, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District; and Cathedral Home for
Children, a Wyoming corporation, Defendants.

Office of the Risk Management and Insurance Services:

No.

Received From

Type of Damage

Claimant
Date of
Damage

28. Beltran, Beltran, Smith &
MacKenzie,
Steven P. Beltran
Damages Marlon Makai Buchnan On or about
10/22/13
29. Cheryl Burns Damages Cheryl Burns 03/17/14
30. Lucy Carnero Damages Lucy Carnero Not clearly
stated
31. Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley
Paul S. Zuckerman
Damages Guadalupe Davila Hernandez 01/30/14
32. Center for Disability Access
Mark Potter
Damages Meusett Sanchez 10/21/13
33. D & Z Law Group, LLP
Erik Zograbian
Damages Fabian Cano 04/01/14
480
0123456789
v2

34. DRLC Disability Rights Legal
Center
Max Goldman
Damages Moises Anthony Rodriguez
Maria Rodriguez
Approx
10/13/13
on going
35. Gladys Fuentes Damages Gladys Fuentes
Gladis Fuentes
Omar Velasquez
03/28/14
36. Alejandra M. Gallardo Damages Rachel Alexis Gutierrez 11/13/13
37. Ilsa Glandzberg Damages Cole M. Sweeney 2011-2012
38. Damaris Gomez Damages Jacqueline Gomez 04/19/13
39. Shelley Gant Damages Samarra Washington
Shelley Gant
10/24/13
40. Erika Gomez Damages Kevin Salazar 03/17/14
41. Halpern Law Firm
Loren Halpern
Damages Aaliyah Grandberry 01/29/14
42. Katmissky & Jamsheed
Shar Ron Garrison
Damages Shar Ron Garrison 02/27/14
43. James Victor Kosnett Damages Isis Adkins 10/22/13
03/05/14
03/24/14
44. Alexander Krakow Glick Damages Colleen Goree-Grant (3 Recd) 11/25/13
45. Erica Horenstein Damages Erica Horenstein 02/11/14
03/10/14
46. JML Law
D. Aaron Brock
Damages Colleen Chudnovsky
Adam Chudnovsky
2012/2013
2013/2014
47. Law Office of Ken I. Karan
Ken I. Karan
Damages Michael Delcid 05/2014
48. Law Offices Allred, Maroko &
Goldberg - Amber Marie Baker

Damages James Anthony Scott II Shear
Avory
Amber Marie Baker
Continuing
08/2013-
12/2013
49. Law Offices of Tab Artis
Tab L. K. Artis
Damages Jaleen Mika Alvarez 11/05/13
50. Law Offices of Carl D. Barnes
Andrew J. Fodo
Damages Steve Veliz-Lainez
Reina Lainez
On or about
12/0613
51. Law Offices of Renuka V. Jain
Renuka V. Jain
Damages MajorArchie Roundtree Retd 08/21/12
52. Law Offices of Michael V.
Jehdian
Michael V. Jehdian
Damages Juan J. Salazar Approx
11/06/13
53. Law Offices of Michael V.
Jehdian
Michael V. Jehdian
Damages Ingris Treminio Approx
11/06/13
481
0123456789
v2

54. Law Offices of Michael P. Kade
Michael P. Kade
Damages Adriana Veronica Rodriguez

01/10/14
Michael P. Kade
Damages Christian Alfredo Vasquez 01/10/14
Michael P. Kade
Damages Julie Janel Vasquez 01/10/14
Michael P. Kade
Damages Wendy Vasquez 01/10/14
58. Law Offices Timothy J. Kodani
Timothy J. Kodani
Damages
(Late Claim)
Brian Cruz, Hidie Esperanza
Emily D. Flores
Betzy Jimenez
Jeisma Mercado
Esli Oasi Ortega-Martinez
Kevin Ramirez
08/12/12 -
04/18/13
59. Law Offices of Matt Koohanim
Matt Koohanim
Damages Joshua Mata 04/03/14
60. Law Offices of F. Anthony
Koushan Anthony Koushan
Damages Diane Zeda Chew 08/21/13
61. Law Offices of Liu & Naime
Omar M. Naime
Damages Vincent Garvey 11/14/13
62. Law Offices of Loren M. Merlin
Loren M. Merlin
Damages Salvador Tafolla (2 Recd) 04/14/14
63. Law Offices Frederick James
Nameth Frederick James Nameth
Damages Mathew E. Gil 12/18/13
64. Law Offices of Larry Parker
Jeff Billings

Damages Jonathan R. Mathews 01/27/14
65. Law Offices of Grace White
Anna Parras
Damages Anna Parra
Wilfredo Parras Moran
03/13/14
66. Gerald L. Marcus Damages Ricardo Pimentel 12/11/13
67. Jesse Martin Damages Zane Martin 11/18/13
68. Maria Martinez Damages Kevin Arista
Maria Martinez
10/24/13
69. Martinian & Associates, Inc.
Arthur Petrousian
Damages Ashley Castillo 11/19/13
70. Gregory W. Moreno & Associates
Arnoldo Casillas
Damages Angel Zaragoza (2 Recd) 12/06/13
71. Naziri Law Firm
Vahid Naziri
Damages Bryant Blanco Lopez 04/10/14
482
0123456789
v2

72. Newman Aaronson Vanaman
David W. German

Damages

Bryce Stokes (2 Recd)
Michael Stokes
Angela Hankins-Stokes
02/2014
73. Owen, Patterson & Owen
Gregory J. Owen
Damages Maria Alvizar (2 Recd) Not clearly
stated
Susan A. Owen
Damages E.Z (3 Recd) Not clearly
stated
75. Owen, Patterson &
Gregory J. Owen
Damages
(Late Claim)
F.Z. Not clearly
stated
Susan A. Owen
Damages J.Z. Not clearly
stated
Susan A. Owen
Damages Frank Z. Not clearly
stated
78. Malik D. Phillips
Sharon Worter-Lunduter
Damages Mark D. Phillips 01/25/14
79. RKH Law Office
Jenny Chau
Damages Alena Strickland 03/02/13

80. Quirk Law Group
Logan Quirk
Damages Dana Aragon
Patricia Olivares
10/21/13
81. Quirk Law Group
Logan Quirk
Damages Cairen Phillips
Jean Roberts
12/10/13
82. Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad
Daniel J. Kolodziej
Damages Nancie Walent Not clearly
stated
83. Jay S. Rothman & Associates
Jay S. Rothman
Damages Phillip Beal 10/07/13
84. Acclaim Resource Partners
Kristen Newman
Vehicle Damages Acclaim Resource Partners
Alfredo Vasquez
01/10/14
85. Jose Alamo Vehicle Damages Miguel Alamo 04/21/14
86. Joel Alfaro Vehicle Damages Joel Alfaro 04/25/14
87. Allstate Insurance
Nicole A. Gray
Vehicle Damages Allstate Insurance
Richard Straub
01/09/14
88. Silvia R. Barraza Vehicle Damages Silvia R. Barraza 12/05/13
89. Vibion Carson Vehicle Damages Vibion Carson 03/12/14
90. Ji Youn Cho Vehicle Damages Ji Youn Cho 03/28/14
91. Brandon Crist Vehicle Damages Brandon Crist 03/12/14
92. Ronda Collins Vehicle Damages Mid-City Insurance Company
Juan Ortiz
01/13/14
93. Rocio V. Curiel Vehicle Damages Rocio V. Curiel 01/14/14
483
0123456789
v2

94. GEICO
David Horan
Vehicle Damages GEICO
Milton Chavez
04/08/14
95. David Gross Vehicle Damages David Gross 05/02/14
96. Otis A. Harris Vehicle Damages Otis A. Harris 04/28/14
97. Louis Hernandez Vehicle Damages Louis Hernandez 03/28/14
98. Sandra Marie Hopes Vehicle Damages Sandra Marie Hopes 03/08/14
99. Infinity Insurance
David Tran
Vehicle Damages Dmitri Burton 03/17/14
100. Infinity Insurance Company
Jeffrey Coe
Vehicle Damages Michelle Moore 03/17/14
101. Walter S. Jackson III Vehicle Damages Walter S. Jackson III 05/01/14
102. Edward Liddie Vehicle Damages Edward Liddie 03/07/14
103. Araceli Lopez Vehicle Damages Araceli Lopez 02/06/14
104. Hwee Fang Sylvia Lukiman Vehicle Damages Hwee Fang Sylvia Lukiman 04/22/14
105. Victor Mercado Vehicle Damages Victor Mercado 02/10/14
106. Johana Mercado Vehicle Damages Johana Mercado 02/10/14
107. Mercury Insurance Group
Kim Faul
Vehicle Damages Chun-Jen Hsuen 03/17/14
108. Infinity Insurance Company
Jeffrey Coe
Vehicle Damages Michelle Moore 03/17/14
109. Quincey Jacobs Vehicle Damages Quincey Jacobs 05/09/14
Jesaka Riddle
Vehicle Damages Stephen Ehrlich 01/23/14
Ahmad Hairston
Vehicle Damages Leo Puentes 03/19/14
112. R. Minnifield Vehicle Damages Rosetta Minnifield 02/28/14
113. Amy Moglen Vehicle Damages Amy Moglen (2 Recd) 04/08/14
114. Ivan Moreno Vehicle Damages Ivan Moreno 03/24/14
115. Guadalupe Nevarez Vehicle Damages Guadalupe Nevarez 04/09/14
116. Zev Reichbach Vehicle Damages Zev Reichbach 01/29/14
117. Mnica Rosas Vehicle Damages Mnica Rosas 03/17/14
118. Inez E. Sanders Vehicle Damages Inez E. Sanders 03/07/14
119. Nancy Solorio Vehicle Damages Nancy Solorio 04/30/14
120. State Farm Insurance Company
Lisa Sweeney
Vehicle Damages Monica Blut 03/25/14
484
0123456789
v2

121. Cloys Frandell Property Loss Cloys Frandell 04/24/14
122. Edwin Lopez Property Loss Edwin Lopez 04/10/14
123. Martha Martinez Property Loss Jacqueline Martinez 05/08/14
124. Rosy Sharma Property Loss Rosy Sharma 03/13/14
125. Hilda G. Vidana Property Loss Samantha N. Brajas-Vidana 03/10/14
126. Maria E. Zarro Property Loss Maria A. Zarro 05/13/14
Facilities Construction Claims Insurance Services:

No.

Received From

Type of Damage

Claimant
Date of
Damage

1. Steve A. Hoffman

Breach of Contract

Merkoh Associates

07/30/13-
04/17/14
continuing

Respectfully Submitted

JEFFERSON CRAIN
Executive Officer of the Board
485
0123456789
TAB 52
File #: 13/14-0089, Version: 1
04-22-14 Regular Board Meeting (CS) Minutes
powered by Legistar
486
0123456789
Bd. of Ed. Regular Board (CS) Meeting - 1 - Minutes, 9:00 a.m., 4-22-14


REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Board Room
9:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The Los Angeles Board of Education acting as the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School
District met in regular session on Tuesday, April 22, 2014, at the Administrative Offices, Board Room,
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, California.
- - - -

Board President Richard Vladovic called the meeting to order at 9:21 a.m.
- - - -

The following Board Members were present: Ms. Mnica Garca, Mr. Bennett Kayser, Mr. Steven
Zimmer, and Dr. Richard Vladovic. Ms. Tamar Galatzan arrived at 9:24 a.m, and Ms. Mnica Ratliff
arrived at 9:27 a.m.

Superintendent John Deasy was present.
- - - -

Mr. Zimmer led the Pledge of Allegiance.
- - -

Mr. Jefferson Crain, Executive Officer of the Board, announced that this meeting would run concurrently
with the 9:30 a.m. Special Board Meeting. He announced that the following items would be discussed in
closed session:

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (Purpose and Authority)

Conference with Legal Counsel

Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1))

Appeal Recommendation in the Matter of the Dismissal of
Valencia Black - OAH Case No. 2012100891

Los Angeles Unified School District, v. F. Sanchez, et al.
Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 4390905

Los Angeles Unified School District, v. Winans, et al.

Sharail Reed, et al., v. State of California, et al.

487
0123456789

UTLA, Aguilar, et al., v. Los Angeles Unified School District
Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS 132987

UTLA, Campuzano, et al., v. Los Angeles Unified School District
Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS 138408

Potential Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4))
1 Case

Personnel (Government Code Section 54957)

Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Public Employment
Assistant Superintendent, School Operations
Associate General Counsel II (5)
Chief Facilities Executive
Chief Financial Officer
Chief of Intensive Support and Intervention
Chief of Police
Chief of Staff, External Affairs
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Procurement Officer
Chief Strategy Officer
Construction Manager (5)
Deputy Director of Facilities Contracts
Deputy Director of Facilities, Maintenance and Operations
Deputy Director of Facilities Planning and Development
Deputy Director of Facilities Program Support Services
Deputy Director of Facilities Project Execution (2)
Deputy Superintendent, School Operations
Director, Facilities Asset Development (2)
Director, Facilities Contracts
Director, Facilities Maintenance & Operations
Director, Facilities Planning and Development
Director, Facilities Program Support Services
Director, Food Services
Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety
Director, Regional Construction (2)
Director, Transportation
Executive Director, Curriculum and Instruction
Executive Director, Adult and Career Education
Executive Director, Intensive Support and Intervention
Executive Director, Office of Data and Accountability
Executive Director, Student Health and Human Services
Executive Director, Parent Community and Student Branch
Executive Director, Talent Management
Executive Director, Special Education
488
0123456789

Local Instructional Area Superintendent (4)
Temporary Advisor on Detached Service to LAs Promise (2)
Conference with Labor Negotiator (Government Code Section 54957.6)

Negotiator: Superintendent Deasy
Employee Organizations:

Associated Administrators of Los Angeles
California School Employees Association
Los Angeles County Building and Construction Trades Council
Los Angeles School Police Association
Los Angeles School Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association
Service Employees International Union, SEIU Local 99
Teamsters
United Teachers Los Angeles
District Represented Employees and Contract Management Personnel

Student Discipline Matters (Education Code Sections 48918(c), (f))

Approval of Notes
- - -

OPEN SESSION ITEMS

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR INITIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

Mr. Crain announced that the following Board Member resolutions will be for Action at the May 13, 2014
Regular Board Meeting:

Mr. Zimmer - Supporting Senate Bill 1174: To Ensure Students Access to Biliteracy (Res-084-13/14)

Whereas, On the statewide primary election of June 2, 1998 California voters approved Proposition
227 which severely restricted the use of primary language for instructing English Learners and instead
called for a transitional program of Structured English Immersion that was normally not to last for
more than one year;

Whereas, This initiative was the first to ask the public to vote on a specific instructional strategy for
educating children,

Whereas, Normally, instructional methods are the purview of teacher training and research institutions
where educators debate decisions about instruction through a process adjudicated by the State Board
of Education,

Whereas, In 2006 the California Dept. of Education contracted with the American Institutes of
Research and West Ed to conduct a five year legislatively mandated evaluation of the effects of
Proposition 227,

Whereas, This study found that Proposition 227 had not helped substantially in improving English
Learner reclassification, integration, or academic performance;
489
0123456789

Whereas, The program requirements of Proposition 227 do not reflect the current state of the art
evidence-based programs that develop students biliteracy and bilingualism and are the most effective
for long term academic success and for closing the achievement gap;

Whereas, A large body of research has demonstrated the cognitive benefits and increase in academic
performance of students in dual and tri-immersion programs;

Whereas, As evidenced by the growth of these programs across the state, parents have expressed their
interest in having multilingual programs, in order to prepare their children to participate in the global
economy;

Whereas, SB 1174 (Lara, D-33); which asks the Legislature to place an initiative on the ballot to
amend Proposition 227; has been introduced and is currently under consideration by the California
Senate, and

Whereas, SB 1174 has the support of the California Assn. for Bilingual Education and Californians
Together, a coalition of parents, teachers, education advocates and civil rights groups, now, therefore
be it

Resolved, That the Board of Education strongly support Senate Bill 1174, introduced by Senator
Ricardo Lara; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Superintendent direct the Office of Legislation to communicate the Districts
position to the appropriate committees of the State Legislature and the Los Angeles delegation.

Ms. Garca - Celebrating Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month (Res-082-13/14)

Whereas, In 1977, Congress introduced a House resolution to proclaim the first ten days of May as
Asian/Pacific Heritage Week;

Whereas, On October, 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution
designating this as an annual celebration, which we now know as Asian-Pacific Heritage Week;

Whereas, In 1990, May was chosen to commemorate the immigration of the first
Japanese to the United States, which was on May, 1843, and to mark the anniversary of the
completion of the transcontinental railroad on May 10, 1869, in which the majority of the workers
who laid the tracks were Chinese immigrants;

Whereas, In 1990 Congress voted to expand Asian-Pacific Heritage from a week to a month-long
celebration and in May 1992, the month of May was permanently designated as Asian/Pacific
American Heritage Month;

Whereas, Studies have found that the academic needs of Asian American and Pacific Islander students
are frequently overlooked;

490
0123456789

Whereas, Understanding Asian and Pacific Islander history is an important part of celebrating Asian
and Pacific Islander Heritage Month;

Whereas, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have contributed in significant ways to all aspects of
society;

Whereas, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have endured and overcome hardship and heartache.
In the earliest years, tens of thousands of Gold Rush pioneers, coal miners, transcontinental railroad
builders, as well as farm and orchard laborers, were subject to unjust working conditions, prejudice,
and discrimination - yet they excelled;

Whereas, Even in the darkness of the Exclusion Act and Japanese internment, Asian Americans and
Pacific Islanders have persevered, providing for their families and creating opportunities for their
children;

Whereas, California is one of the states with the largest Asian American and Pacific Islanders
population; and

Whereas, In the Los Angeles Unified School District, 6.14% of the student population are identified
as Asian, Filipino, or Pacific Islander; now therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles proclaims May as the Asian/Pacific
Islander Heritage Month and encourages all students, faculty, administrators, and parents to remember
and celebrate the contributions that Asian and Pacific Islanders have made to California and the
United States through various classroom projects; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Superintendent work with all schools of the Los Angeles Unified School District
to recognize and celebrate Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month through culturally relevant
activities and through in-depth discussions of historically relevant topics.

- - -

Ms. Garca, Ms. Ratliff Affirming our Commitment to the School Discipline Policy and School Climate
Bill of Rights and Establishing May as School Climate Bill of Rights Awareness Month (Res-083-13/14)

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District is committed to closing the achievement gap by
providing equitable access to a vigorous education that ensures all students will graduate from high
school college-prepared and career-ready;

Whereas, Student achievement begins with safe classrooms and a healthy environment that is
conducive to learning and free from disruption;

Whereas, On May 14, 2013, the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District adopted
the School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights Resolution that among other things,
promotes alternatives to school suspensions; implements restorative justice strategies at schools; and
builds upon LAUSD's implementation of the School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and
Supports (SWPBIS) aimed at reducing suspensions, increasing attendance and academic achievement;

491
0123456789

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District SWPBIS Task Force has shown continued partner
support and demand for effective and efficient implementation of the 2013 School Discipline Policy
and School Climate Bill of Rights resolution;

Whereas, The White House has announced the My Brothers Keeper Initiative and has specifically
called for improving school climate and reversing zero-tolerance policies;

Whereas, The Successful School Climate: Progressive Discipline and Safety Committee has heard
testimony from students, teachers and administrators on how Positive Behavior and Interventions and
Support (PBIS) and Restorative Justice (RJ) create an academically supportive environment in
schools;

Whereas, Youth, parents, and community organizations continue to work with LAUSD leadership on
expanding the implementation of the School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights
Resolution, as well as working with the School Climate Committee and Discipline task force;

Whereas, School Climate Bill of Rights Month is a vehicle to promote student empowerment, safety
and wellness in our schools and offers an excellent opportunity to focus the energy, attention,
commitment, and action of the entire educational community on ensuring students are engaged,
healthy, and achieving;

Whereas, The LAUSD is committed to helping students succeed academically without imposing
negative life altering consequences that can further add to their likelihood to be part of the school-to-
prison-pipeline;

Whereas, The Los Angeles School Police Department has continued to be a champion for reforms to
end outdated approaches to discipline and punitive strategies for correcting inappropriate student
behavior;

Whereas, LAUSD has been the trailblazer in California and San Francisco Unified School District and
Fresno Unified School District have followed suit toward more mental health based approaches to
correcting negative student behavior;

Whereas, School Climate Bill of Rights Month is an opportunity for all students in LAUSD to deepen
their educational experience and to strengthen their connection to the schools culture; now, therefore,
be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District affirms our
commitment to the School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights;

Resolved further, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District establishes
May as School Climate Bill of Rights Awareness Month; and be it finally,

Superintendent to work with all schools to recognize and celebrate May as the School Climate Bill of
Rights Awareness Month.

492
0123456789

Dr. Vladovic modified the Order of Business
- - -

CONSENT ITEMS

Items for action below to be adopted by a single vote:

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION:

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION

Mr. Kayser, Ms. Ratliff - Parkinsons Awareness Month (Res-079-13/14)
(Noticed April 8, 2014)

Whereas, Parkinsons disease is a progressive neurological movement disorder of the central nervous
system, which has a unique impact on each patient;

Whereas, There are over one million Americans diagnosed with Parkinsons disease;

Whereas, Although new medicines and therapies may enhance life for some time for people with
Parkinsons, more work is needed for a cure;

Whereas, Increased education and research are needed to help find more effective treatments with
fewer side effects and ultimately a cure for Parkinsons disease;

Whereas, A multidisciplinary approach to Parkinsons disease care includes local wellness, support,
and caregiver groups; and

Whereas, April has been proclaimed as World Wide Parkinsons Awareness Month for all to
recognize the need for more research and help in dealing with the devastating effects of Parkinsons
disease; now therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of Los Angeles Unified School District proclaim April as World
Wide Parkinsons Disease Awareness Month.
- - -

Dr. Vladovic, Ms. Garca Recognizing April 2014 as Autism Awareness Month (Res-080-13/14)

Whereas, Autism is a spectrum disorder, which means no two people with autism are affected the
same way, and it is a complex developmental disability that usually appears during the first three
years of life and results in a neurological disorder that affects the functioning of the brain;

Whereas, Autism knows no racial, ethnic or social boundaries and neither income, lifestyle nor
education affects the occurrence, and it is estimated that 1.5 million people live with autism spectrum
disorder in the United States;

493
0123456789

Whereas, Autism affects social interaction, and communication skills, and an average of 1 in 88
children are diagnosed with this spectrum disorder, and prevalence has increased 78% since the
United States Centers for Disease Control and Preventions first study in 2007;

Whereas, Early intervention and detection of autism can make a dramatic difference in a childs
ability to overcome challenges related to autism;

Whereas, With support, people with autism can live full lives and make meaningful contributions to
society; and

Whereas, April 2, 2014, is known as Light It Up Blue Day which shines a light on Autism
Awareness; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District acknowledges the
month of April as Autism Awareness Month, and we pledge our support and encouragement to the
assistance of all those affected by autism;

Resolved further, That the Board remains committed to providing high quality intervention and
support services for our children identified as having autism;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent, at every April Board meeting, provide the LAUSD with an
annual report that shares relevant information to the public about autism including our plan to educate
parents and LAUSD staff on providing support services for children with autism; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Superintendent, at every April Board meeting, provide an update on the programs
that LAUSD offers for children who are living with autism and valuable information about the
research based services that the district offers.

- - -

Ms. Ratliff, Ms. Garca, Dr. Vladovic Teacher Appreciation Week 2014 (Res-081-13/14)

Whereas, Instruction and teachers are at the very heart of the Los Angeles Unified School Districts
mission to provide our students with an education that prepares them to be college and career-ready;

Whereas, Teachers are the drivers of educational high achievement towards the goal of 100 %
graduation rates;

Whereas, Teachers are more than purveyors of knowledge in the classroom, they also serve our
students as role models and mentors;

Whereas, Teachers positively impact the lives of students well beyond the classroom; and

Whereas, The National Education Association and the National Parent Teacher Association have
designated the week of May 5-9, 2014, as National Teacher Appreciation Week and May 6, 2014, as
National Teacher Day; now, therefore, be it

494
0123456789

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District hereby recognizes
and honors the contributions of teachers to quality education across the Los Angeles Unified School
District;

Resolved further, That the Los Angeles Unified School District hereby declares the week of May 5-9,
2014, as Teacher Appreciation Week; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Los Angeles Unified School District hereby declares May 6, 2014, as National
Teacher Day.
- - -

CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS

Mr. Crain made the following statement:

Before action is taken on the Correspondence regarding the Williams/Valenzuela Settlement
Uniform Complaint Quarterly Report Summary, a public hearing must be held.

This constitutes a public hearing on the report and a maximum of 12 individuals who wish to
address the Board on this item will be heard. Those who wish to speak to this report should pull a
speaker form from the slots located on the pillar in the rear of the Board Room. Speakers will be
heard in numerical order as indicated on the speaker form.

There were no speakers to address the Board on these items.

Following Ms. Ratliffs comment regarding custodial staffing, Ms. Garca moved the consent items be
adopted, Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion, and by general consent, the Consent items were adopted.
- - -

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION

Dr. Vladovic resumed the Order of Business:

BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT NO. 373 - 13/14
Charter School Division
(Issuance of Notice of Violations for Charter High School of Arts Multimedia and
Performing (CHAMPS)

Mr. Crain made the following statement:

Before action is taken on Board of Education Report No. 373-13/14, a public hearing must be held.

This constitutes a public hearing on the report and a maximum of 12 individuals who wish to
address the Board on this item will be heard. Those who wish to speak to this report should pull a
speaker form from the slots located on the pillar in the rear of the Board Room. Speakers will be
heard in numerical order as indicated on the speaker form.

The following speakers addressed the Board:

495
0123456789

Julie Collier, Parents Advocacy
Erika Proctor, Attorney, Procopio Law Firm
Joanne Saliba, Executive Director, CHAMPS Charter School
Roland Fink, CPA, Member of CHAMPS Board

Dr. Robert C. Perry, Administrator Coordinator, Charter Schools Division, responded to questions from
Board Members.

Ms. Ratliff moved that the report be adopted. Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion.

Following Board Member discussion, and by general consent, the report was adopted.

- - -

PUBLIC COMMENT

The following speakers addressed the Board on the items indicated:

Ms. Carmen Rios District Policies
Mr. David Plaza Public Safety
Ms. Melodie Kimspodia Peace Over Violence
Ms. Rosario Gomez Raymond Avenue Elementary
Mr. Carl Petersen Resolution Recognizing April 2014 as
Autism Awareness Month.

- - - -
Dr. Vladovic introduced and welcomed Ms. Sylvia Rousseau, Board Liaison to District 1.

- - - -

The Board recessed the public portion of the closed session meeting at 10:15 a.m. Closed session
discussion began at 10:24 a.m. and ended at 2:41 p.m.
- - - -

The Board reconvened the public portion of the closed session meeting at 2:46 p.m. The following
Board Members were present: Ms. Galatzan, Ms. Garca, Mr. Kayser, Ms. Ratliff, Mr. Zimmer, and
Dr. Vladovic.
- - - -

Mr. Crain announced the following reportable actions:

The Board of Education approved the expulsion of students in case numbers 068-13/14, 076-13/14,
077-13/14, 078-13/14, 079-13/14, 080-13/14, 081-13/14, 082-13/14, 083-13/14, 084-13/14,
085-13/14, 086-13/14, 087-13/14, 088-13/14, with the recommended dispositions. The Board of
Education further approved the conditional enrollment of students in case numbers 040A-13/14 with
the recommended dispositions. The Board of Education also denied enrollment in case numbers
041A-13/14, 042A-13/14, 043A-13/14, 044A-13/14, and 045A-13/14.

The vote was 6 ayes.
496
0123456789

The Board of Education authorized the initiation of dismissal action of 1 early ed teacher,
6 elementary school teachers, 3 middle school teachers, and 2 high school teachers.


The Board of Education authorized the initiation of dismissal action of 1 elementary teacher.

The vote was 4 ayes; 2 noes, Mr. Kayser and Dr. Vladovic.

The Board of Education authorized the non re-election of 39 probationary teachers.


The Board of Education authorized settlement of all property owner claims in the case of Los
Angeles Unified School District v. F. Sanchez, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.
BC 439095. Terms and conditions will be available upon the finalization of the settlement.


The Board of Education authorized settlement of all property owner claims in the case of Los
Angeles Unified School District v. Winans, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC
438745. Terms and conditions will be available upon the finalization of the settlement.


The Board of Education authorized the initiation of litigation against financial institutions which
through their lending practices caused a diminution of assessed property values causing a decrease
in the overall property tax revenues available to the District.


The Board of Education authorized settlement of the case of Sharail Reed, et al. v. State of
California, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 432420. Terms and conditions will be
available upon the finalization of the settlement.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Rachelle Alexander as Temp
Adviser, with the term ending June 30, 2015. Terms and conditions will be available upon the
finalization of the contract.

The vote was 5 ayes; and 1 abstention, Ms. Ratliff.

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Mohammad Bagheri as
Construction Manager, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available
upon the finalization of the contract.

497
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Alex Barrera as Regional
Construction Director, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with David Binkle as Director of
Food Services, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available upon
the finalization of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Steve Boehm as Deputy
Director of Facilities Project Execution, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions
will be available upon the finalization of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Rachel Bonkovsky as
Executive Director of Talent Management, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and
conditions will be available upon the finalization of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Soufiane Boudiaf as


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Enrique Boullt as Chief
Operating Officer, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Robert Bravo as Local
Instructional Area Superintendent, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will
be available upon the finalization of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Aaron Bridgewater as Deputy
Director of Facilities Planning, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be
available upon the finalization of the contract.


498
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Ronald Chandler as Chief
Information Officer, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Tommy Chang as Local


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Kathleen Collins as Associate
General Counsel II, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available

The vote was 4 ayes; and 2 abstentions, Ms. Ratliff and Mr. Zimmer.

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Debra Duardo as Executive
Director, Student Health and Human Services, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Roger Finstad as Director of
Facilities Maintenance and Operations, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Albert J. Grazioli as Facilities
Asset Development Director, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Cheryl Hildreth as Local


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Matt Hill as Chief Strategy
Officer, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be available upon the


499
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Mark Hovatter as Chief
Facilities Executive, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be available


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Sharyn Howell as Executive
Director, Special Education, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Raju Kaval as Director of
Facilities Program Support Services, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Edward Khachatourian as


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Michelle King as Deputy
Superintendent, School Operations, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Rowena Lagrosa as Executive
Director, Parent Community and Student Services Branch, with the term ending June 30, 2016.
Terms and conditions will be available upon the finalization of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Robert E. Laughton as Deputy
Director of Facilities, Maintenance and Operations, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Cynthia Lim as Executive
Director, Office of Data and Accountability, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and


500
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Gerardo Loera as Executive
Director of Curriculum and Instruction, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Sunil Chalya Mallaiah as
Regional Construction Director, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Roberto Martinez as Local


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Gregory McNair as Associate


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Yvette Merriman as Garrett as
Director of Facilities Contracts, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Mark A. Miller as Associate


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Timothy Milstead as


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Yeghishe Minassian as


501
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Alexander Molina as Associate


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Donna Muncey as Chief of
Intensive Support and Intervention, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Rebecca Nadybal as Executive
Director, Intensive Support and Intervention, with the term ending June 30, 2015. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Diane Pappas as Associate


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Lori Pawinski as Temp Adviser
with the term ending June 30, 2015. Terms and conditions will be available upon the finalization
of the contract.


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Earl Perkins as Assistant
Superintendent, School Operations, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Megan Reilly as Chief
Financial Officer, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be available


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with George Silva as Chief
Procurement Officer, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available


502
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with John W. Sterritt as Director,
Office of Environmental Health and Safety, with the term ending June 30, 2015. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with D. Tatevossian as Deputy
Director of Facilities Project Execution, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Anahid K. Tokes as Director of
Facilities Planning and Development, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Hugh C. Tucker as Deputy
Director of Facilities Contracts, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Alex Walsh OBrien as
Facilities Asset Development Director r, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with William Wherritt as Deputy
Director of Facilities Program Support Services, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Donald Wilkes as Director of
Transportation, with the term ending June 30, 2016. Terms and conditions will be available upon


The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Edgar Zazueta as Chief of Staff,
External Affairs, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be available upon


503
0123456789

The Board of Education approved the employment agreement with Steven Zipperman as Chief of
Police, with the term ending June 30, 2017. Terms and conditions will be available upon the


The Board of Education approved notes from previous meetings.


- - - -

On motion by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Dr. Vladovic, and by general consent the meeting was adjourned
at 3:04 p.m. Ms. Galatzan was absent.

APPROVED BY THE BOARD:

__________________________________ ____________________________________
RICHARD VLADOVIC JEFFERSON CRAIN
PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE BOARD
504
0123456789
File #: 13/14-0087, Version: 1
04-22-14 Special Board Meeting Minutes
powered by Legistar
505
0123456789
Bd. of Ed. Special Board (CS) Meeting - 1 - Minutes, 9:30 a.m., 4-22-14


SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MINUTES
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Board Room
9:30 a.m., Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The Los Angeles Board of Education acting as the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School
District met in regular session on Tuesday, April 22, 2014, at the Administrative Offices, Board Room,
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, California.
- - - -

Board President Richard Vladovic called the meeting to order at 10:15 a.m.
- - - -

The following Board Members were present: Ms. Tamar Galatzan, Ms. Mnica Garca, Mr. Bennett
Kayser, Ms. Mnica Ratliff, Mr. Steven Zimmer, and Dr. Richard Vladovic.

Superintendent John Deasy was present.
- - - -

Mr. Jefferson Crain, Executive Officer of the Board, announced that this meeting was concurrently
opened with the 9:00 a.m. Regular Board Meeting. He announced that the following item would be
discussed in closed session:

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (Purpose and Authority)

Personnel (Government Code Section 54957)

Employee Evaluation
Inspector General Evaluation
- - - -

The Board recessed the public portion of the closed session meeting at 10:16 a.m. Closed session
discussion began at 12:20 p.m. and ended at 2:41 p.m.

- - - -

The Board reconvened the public portion of the closed session meeting at 2:46 p.m. The following
Board Members were present: Ms. Galatzan, Ms. Garca, Mr. Kayser, Ms. Ratliff, Mr. Zimmer, and
Dr. Vladovic.
- - - -

Mr. Crain announced that there was no reportable action.

506
0123456789
Bd. of Ed. Special Board (CS) Meeting - 2 - Minutes, 9:30 a.m., 4-22-14

On motion by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Dr. Vladovic, and by general consent the meeting was adjourned
at 3:04 p.m. Ms. Galatzan was absent.

APPROVED BY THE BOARD:

__________________________________ ____________________________________
RICHARD VLADOVIC JEFFERSON CRAIN
PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE BOARD
507
0123456789

LAUSD Board Meeting Materials 6-10-14

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LAUSD Board Meeting Materials 6-10-14

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

Report Submitted on 05/29/2014, Revision 1

Report Submitted on 05/29/2014, Revision 1

For FY 2015, in addition to responding to allegations of individual misconduct, we also plan to

Maybe you are a School District

Maybe you know something about

The Office of the Inspector General

If you wish, we will keep your

Report Submitted on 05/29/2014, Revision 1

You might also like