Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I Introduction
From the outset of this essay it is necessary to define the basic principles of
Scientific Management in order for the statement to be fully understood and why if
at all such a practice is 'inevitable' and indeed 'irreversible' within a service
industry context.
From this five key facets have evolved that lie at the foundation of scientific
management. Hales (1994) has summarised these as follows: - systematic
standardised work methods via mechanisation and standard times. - a clean
functional division between managers and non-mangers. Braverman (1974)
described this as the 'separation of conception from execution'. - centralised
planning and control. - an instrumental, low-involvement employment relationship
due to the requirement of the individual employee being that of just carrying out
their specified low-skilled task. - an ideology of neutral technical efficiency.
It has been suggested that the principles of scientific management have been
widely adopted throughout industry.
Although this rise has certainly been evident within manufacturing industries the
service industry has been slower to utilise the principles of rationalisation. The
question must therefore be asked why has the sector been slow on the uptake of
these beliefs and could the reason for this provide an argument against the
suggestion of the 'inevitability' of the principles within the service industries.
Targett (1995) has identified seven distinctive characteristics that highlight the
limitations of applying scientific management principles and therefore raising
doubts over the 'inevitability' of such management practices being used in the
service sector.
In contrast it can be argued that the service sector can embrace scientific
management successfully and indeed may well be unavoidable. Two central
elements to this ideology is the 'MacDonaldisation' of society and the trend of
franchising within the sector. Furthermore Targett (1995) has identified techniques
now being employed to help apply rationalisation within service industries, such as
Data Envelope Analysis (DEA), enabling efficiency of staff to be measured.
Other factors that could prevent companies reversing rationalisation include the
enormous costs involved in 'demechanising' the company. For example an
increasing amount of budget hotels are introducing costly automated self check-in
consoles. Additionally decentralising companies would also involve massive
management engineering. Therefore, in light of such factors, the statement can be
partially supported in that it would be unlikely that rationalisation could be
reversed.
III Conclusion
Furthermore the service sector, most notably hospitality, thrives on the multi-
faceted individuals that are attracted to the industry. But the deskilling due to
rationalisation means that such people are 'strait-jacketed into one dimensional
jobs' (Hales 1994) stifling variety and creativity. Therefore such a sentiment tends
to argue against the notion that scientific management principles are inevitable.
In summary to return to the original statement it can be argued against the belief
that scientific management is inevitable and irreversible throughout the entire
service industry, although certainly some areas of the industry could benefit from
utilising such a management strategy - notably in the budget sector.
Bibliography
Peters, T. & Waterman, R., In Search of excellence, Harper & Row, New York.