Seattle Public Schools Bell Times Analysis for later start times for secondary students. A decision-making framework based on Montgomery County,VA's Neighbor to Neighbor program.
Original Title
Seattle School District Presentation Framework on Bell Times Analysis
Seattle Public Schools Bell Times Analysis for later start times for secondary students. A decision-making framework based on Montgomery County,VA's Neighbor to Neighbor program.
Seattle Public Schools Bell Times Analysis for later start times for secondary students. A decision-making framework based on Montgomery County,VA's Neighbor to Neighbor program.
June 7, 2014 Board Retreat This presentation is intended to provide a brief overview of potential framework templates, discussion of the recommended framework, processes, timelines and milestones. Framework Options Public Involvement (Community Engagement) Framework Bell Times Analysis decision making framework Timelines and Milestones Discussion Overview 2 Framework Options
Framework Definition Broad overview, outline, or skeleton of interlinked items which supports a particular approach to a specific objective, and serves as a guide that can be modified as required by adding or deleting items.
Framework Options Public Education Leadership Project (PELP) Coherence Risk Assessment Health Care New Student Assignment Plan Framework
The School Board adopted a framework for a new student assignment plan: Goals Provide equitable access to programs and services. Offer opportunities for school choice. Foster diversity. Support stronger family engagement with schools. Be easy to understand. Provide predictability and continuity for families. Be feasible and cost effective to implement and to sustain over time. Multi-year timeline and anticipated schedule of activities Student Assignment Framework 4 The Value of Community Engagement Community Engagement Initiatives Relationships with organized groups Informed decisions Understanding of public values Better information flow Inclusion of diverse perspectives Engaged population Increased accountability Assessment of risks Effective Policies Programs and Actions Robust Decision Making Credibility and Trust Involving the Community in the District Decision Making Why? What is the trigger for community engagement? How will the Decision makers use the input? Which type of community contribution will be most useful? When? Is there an opportunity for the community to inform the decision? At which stage of the decision-making life cycle will the community engagement be most helpful? Which public should be involved when? How? What Design considerations will facilitate appropriate community engagement? Could the community engagement be part of larger conversations/initiatives? Do different communities need different types of engagement through the Life Cycle? At Which Stage of the Decision making Life Cycle will Community Involvement be Appropriate? Define the issue Gather Information Establish Decision Criteria Develop alternatives Evaluate alternatives Make Decision Implement Decision Evaluate the Decision Monitor Neighbor to Neighbor (N2N) Handout Analysis and Engagement schedule for a potential 2016-17 School Year Change Timeline and Milestones 8 Type of Community Engagement at each Decision Making Life Cycle Stage (Community Contributions) Task Force (Suggest, Explore, Validate & Reconcile) Define the issue Task Force, Community Interest Groups, Community Partners (S & E) Gather Information Task Force, Community Interest Groups, Community Partners (V & R) Establish Decision Criteria Task Force (S & E) Develop alternatives Neighbor to Neighbor (N2N), Community Forum, Board Community Meetings, Newsletters, Survey, Departmental and School Meetings (E & R) Evaluate alternatives Newsletters, School Board Legislative Process Community Input (V) Make Decision Task Force (R) Implement Decision Survey, Board Community Meetings (V, R & S) Evaluate the Decision Board Community Meetings (V,R&S) Monitor Do you have any questions about what is required? Do you have any questions about why we selected this approach? Discussion 10