Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 K
ga
a
w
1 K
ga
a C
ga
K
ga
a
w
. (2)
The average air properties between the space of air of the ve trays were considered and
computed as per the equations presented by Wilhelm [15] from observed values of the dry
bulb and wet bulb temperatures measured at a distance of 25 mm below the bottom tray
and above the top tray.
Sarsavadia et al. [13] determined the value of thin-layer drying constant of onion,
variety: Agri found white-1 as c equal to 1.01 and the dependence of drying rate constant,
k, on drying air variables (temperature, velocity, and humidity) was developed in the
form of Arrhenius-type model and used for predicting the moisture content of onion. The
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2536
equation is written as follows:
k 47:57v
0:31
W
0:20
exp
3034
T
ab
(3)
COD; r
2
0:988 and w
2
1:02 10
7
for 0.25 m/spvp1.0 m/s, 50 1CpTp80 1C, and 0.0075 kg/kgpWp0.0640 kg/kg.
Based on the drying rate, the total energy required per unit weight of water was
computed considering the contribution by all the three components supplying energy to
the air, i.e. solar air heater, electrical heater, and blower.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Thermal performance of the solar air heater
Thermal performance of the solar air heater was evaluated experimentally at six
different airow rates on six different clear sunny days covering whole day from 9.00 a.m.
to 6.00 p.m. The inlet air temperature was taken to be equal to ambient temperature, as
inlet air was directly drawn from the ambient. The maximum outlet air temperature of 73.0
and 48.2 1C was obtained from the collector for the lowest (0.53 kg/min) and highest
(8.09 kg/min) airow rates, respectively. The maximum air temperature rise of 38.2 and
11.2 1C was obtained at the lowest and highest airow rates, respectively.
For various natures of climatic parameters, Lunde [16], and Ting and Shove [17] explained
the use of average collector efciency over the desired time period. Soponronnarit et al. [9]
developed a relation between daily average collector efciency and the air mass ow rate. A
correlation between the daily average collector efciency and the airow rate for the present
study is established [18] in the form of an equation given by
Z
c
0:8141 exp0:518 _ m
a
, (4)
for 0.53 kg/minp_ m
a
p8.09 kg/min.
The average daily efciency of the collector varied between a minimum value of 22%
and a maximum value of 81% indicating a good performance of the collector.
3.2. Experimental conditions
During all the experimental runs, ambient temperature, wind velocity, and relative
humidity ranged between 23.0 and 39.9 1C, 0.9 and 3.6 m/s, and 17.5% and 62.6%,
respectively. Maximum solar irradiance (around noon hours) varied between 843 and
998 W/m
2
. Fig. 4 shows the variation of ambient conditions with time of day during the
experimental run conducted at 65 1C drying air temperature, 2.43 kg/min airow rate, and
75% fraction of air recycled (run no. 12).
Experimental drying conditions in terms of drying air temperature, air mass ow rate,
fraction of air recycled, and elapsed drying time with their initial and nal moisture
contents for all the 31 experiments are given in Table 2. It is seen from the table that the
elapsed drying time for all the experimental runs ranged between 225 and 555 min. The
amount of total air required per unit mass of dry onion ranged between 2627 and 12328 kg
during all the experimental runs. As expected, it is seen from Table 2 that the total amount
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2537
of air required per unit mass of dry onion decreased with increase in drying air temperature
while increased with increase in airow rate. The total amount of air required per unit mass
of dry onion is increased marginally with increase in fraction of air recycled.
3.3. Drying behavior
Drying behavior is shown by plotting the curve between the mean moisture content of
onion of all the ve trays and elapsed drying time. Fig. 5 shows the variation of mean
moisture content with drying time for different fractions of air recycled at 65 1C drying air
temperature and 0.65 m/s air velocity. It is obviously observed from the gure that the
moisture content is decreased faster at the initial stages of drying and thereafter became
slower as drying proceeds. It is seen from the gure that the drying rate decreased
marginally with the increase in fraction of air recycled. It is also observed from these curves
that the predicted moisture content (Eq. (1)) agreed closely with its measured values.
3.4. Exhaust air temperature and relative humidity
Fig. 6 shows the variation of experimental and predicated values of exhaust air
temperature with drying time at different airow rates and at 55 1C drying air temperature.
It is seen from these curves that the exhaust air temperature increased faster during the
initial stage of drying and became almost constant during the nal stage of drying. The
value of exhaust air temperature is higher for the higher airow rate in the initial stages of
drying and is almost same for all the airow rates during the nal stage of drying. Likewise
variation of exhaust air temperature with drying time for airow rate of 5.25 kg/min and
air temperature of 65 1C in the drying chamber for different fractions of air recycled is
shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen from the gure that no signicant difference is observed in
the variation of exhaust air temperature with drying time at different fractions of air
recycled.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
500
600
700
800
900
S
o
l
a
r
I
r
r
a
d
i
a
n
c
e
(
W
/
m
2
)
Time of day (h)
1
2
3
4
5
6
W
i
n
d
V
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
(
m
/
s
)
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
A
m
b
i
e
n
t
R
H
(
%
)
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
A
m
b
i
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Fig. 4. Variation of ambient conditions with time of day during the experiment conducted at 65 1C drying air
temperature, 2.43 kg/min airow rate, and 75% fraction of air recycled (&: solar irradiance; J: ambient
temperature; W: ambient RH; : wind velocity).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2538
Similarly, variation of the exhaust air relative humidity with drying time at different
airow rates and air temperature of 55 1C is shown in Fig. 8. It is seen from Fig. 8 that the
relative humidity of the exhaust air is higher in the beginning of drying and decreased with
drying time as drying proceeds and became constant in the nal stage of drying. This is
because the higher drying rate of the onion during initial stage of drying results in release
of more moisture in the drying air. It is also observed from the gure that during the initial
stage of drying, the relative humidity of the exhaust air is higher for the lower airow rate.
Though, at lower airow rate, the rate of release of moisture from the product is lower, the
decrease in dry bulb temperature of exhaust air is higher, resulting in higher relative
humidity of the exhaust air. This also means that the effect of decrease in air temperature
dominates over the effect on the relative humidity.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 2
Experimental drying condition and drying time with their respective initial and nal moisture contents of the
onion slice for solar-assisted drying of onion
Run
no.
T
(1C)
v (m/s) F
r
(%)
Air mass ow rate Air mass
(kg/(kg dry
onion))
Weight of
the sample
(kg)
M
0
(% d.b.)
M
f
(% d.b.)
t
(min)
kg/min kg/(minkg
dry onion)
1 55 0.30 00 2.43 07.67 4258 2.2722 616.50 8.10 555
2 55 0.65 00 5.25 17.90 8594 2.1347 628.33 7.42 480
3 55 1.00 00 8.09 28.34 12328 2.0809 628.86 6.89 435
4 65 0.30 00 2.43 08.21 3201 2.1478 624.64 7.95 390
5 65 0.65 00 5.25 16.66 5749 2.3103 633.68 7.56 345
6 65 1.00 00 8.09 26.55 7566 2.2103 624.99 7.52 285
7 75 0.30 00 2.43 08.43 2654 2.0846 623.14 8.06 315
8 75 0.65 00 5.25 17.86 4554 2.1244 649.93 8.14 255
9 75 1.00 00 8.09 28.33 6374 2.0993 630.33 7.77 225
10 65 0.30 25 2.43 07.72 3127 2.2940 627.86 7.89 405
11 65 0.30 50 2.43 07.94 3333 2.2250 625.50 6.99 420
12 65 0.30 75 2.43 08.29 3608 2.1385 629.06 7.83 435
13 65 0.65 25 5.25 16.52 5698 2.3709 646.06 8.05 345
14 65 0.65 50 5.25 16.47 5927 2.3891 649.42 7.48 360
15 65 0.65 75 5.25 17.19 6445 2.2852 648.60 7.56 375
16 65 0.65 90 5.25 17.26 6730 2.2443 637.90 7.36 390
17 65 1.00 25 8.09 26.30 7494 2.2169 620.38 8.35 285
18 65 1.00 50 8.09 25.91 7773 2.2680 626.22 7.98 300
19 65 1.00 75 8.09 27.09 8939 2.2126 640.74 7.23 330
20 65 1.00 90 8.09 27.75 9573 2.1568 639.43 7.38 345
21 75 0.30 25 2.43 07.96 2627 2.2661 641.30 7.35 330
22 75 0.30 50 2.43 08.21 2709 2.2103 645.69 7.80 330
23 75 0.30 75 2.43 08.35 2881 2.1633 642.54 7.82 345
24 75 0.65 25 5.25 17.05 4605 2.2553 640.38 7.66 270
25 75 0.65 50 5.25 16.38 4669 2.4029 650.10 7.35 285
26 75 0.65 75 5.25 16.44 4687 2.3813 646.22 7.54 285
27 75 0.65 90 5.25 17.04 5111 2.2968 645.46 6.51 300
28 75 1.00 25 8.09 27.39 6574 2.1882 640.64 7.41 240
29 75 1.00 50 8.09 26.30 6311 2.3240 655.29 7.86 240
30 75 1.00 75 8.09 26.19 6679 2.3455 659.48 6.87 255
31 75 1.00 90 8.09 28.03 7147 2.1707 652.02 6.94 255
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2539
3.5. Specic energy required
Fig. 9 shows the variation of energy required with drying time at different drying air
temperatures and airow rate of 2.43 kg/min. It is seen from Fig. 9 that the energy required
is lower at higher levels of drying air temperature. It is obviously observed that as drying
proceeds the required energy is also increased.
Fig. 10 shows the variation of energy required per unit mass of water removed with
mean moisture content at different fractions of air recycled for 75 1C drying air
temperature and 5.25 kg/min airow rate. It can be seen from this gure that energy
required per unit mass of water increased with the decrease in mean moisture content of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
E
x
h
a
u
s
t
A
i
r
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Drying Time (min)
Fig. 6. Variation of exhaust air temperature with drying time at different air velocities for 55 1C air temperature
(&: 2.43 kg/min; +: 5.25 kg/min; J: 8.09 kg/min).
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
M
e
a
n
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
,
(
d
e
c
i
m
a
l
d
.
b
.
)
Drying Time, (min)
Fig. 5. Variation of mean moisture content with drying time at different fractions of air recycled for 0.65 m/s air
velocity and 65 1C air temperature (W: 0%; : 25%; J: 50%; +: 75%; &: 90%; : predicted).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2540
the onion slice. This is in keeping with the normal drying behavior of biological materials
and can be explained by realizing that the drier is the product, more will be the energy
needed per unit mass of water removed for further drying. It can be seen from Fig. 10 that,
at any stage of drying, the energy required at given mean moisture content, as expected, is
lower for higher levels of fraction of air recycled.
3.6. Total specic energy required
Total energy required per unit mass of water as well as energy contributed by solar air
heater, auxiliary heater, and blower for dehydration of the onion slices from an initial
moisture content of about 86% (w.b.) to nal moisture content of about 7% (w.b.) at
different temperatures, airow rates, and fraction of air recycled is given in Table 3.
During without using recirculation of air, at a given air temperature, the contribution to
ARTICLE IN PRESS
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
0.175
0.200
0.225
0.250
E
x
h
a
u
s
t
A
i
r
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
H
u
m
i
d
i
t
y
(
d
e
c
i
m
a
l
)
Drying Time (min)
Fig. 8. Variation of exhaust air relative humidity with drying time at different airow rates for 55 1C air
temperature (&: 2.43 kg/min; +: 5.25 kg/min; J: 8.09 kg/min).
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
54
56
58
60
62
64
E
x
h
a
u
s
t
A
i
r
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Drying Time (min)
Fig. 7. Variation of exhaust air temperature with drying time at different fractions of air recycled for 5.25 kg/min
airow rate and 65 1C air temperature (W: 0%; : 25%; J: 50%; +: 75%; &: 90%).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2541
the energy by each of the energy contributing components (i.e. solar air heater, auxiliary
heater, and blower) increased with increase in airow rate. The increase in the contribution
to the total energy by auxiliary heater is much larger than the increase by the blower and
solar air heater. It is also seen that, at a given air mass ow rate, the contribution to the
total energy by the solar air heater, auxiliary heater, and blower decreased with increase in
temperature. This is due to the fact that the total drying time is reduced as the drying air
temperature is increased.
The percent energy contribution (Table 3) provided by the solar air heater, auxiliary
heater, and blower ranged between 24.5% and 44.5%, 40.2% and 66.9%, and 8.6% and
16.3%, respectively. At a given drying air temperature, the percent energy contribution by
the solar air heater decreased while that of auxiliary heater increased with increase in
airow rates of the drying air. This is understandable because at higher airow rates, the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Mean Moisture Content (decimal d.b.)
Fig. 10. Variation of energy required with mean moisture content at different fractions of air recycled for 5.25
kg/min airow rate and 65 1C air temperature (W: 0%; : 25%; J: 50%; +: 75%; &: 90%).
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Drying Time (min)
Fig. 9. Variation of energy required with drying time at different air temperatures for 2.43 kg/min airow rate
(&: 55 1C; +: 65 1C; J: 75 1C).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2542
temperature of the air at the collector outlet will be decreased and hence the outlet air from
the collector will be required to be heated by the auxiliary heater by larger temperature
difference. At a given airow rate, but at different drying air temperatures, very less
difference in the percentage contribution to the total energy by the solar air heater is
observed. For a given set temperature of the drying air, percent energy contribution by the
auxiliary heater is decreased with increase in airow rates due to reduction in total drying
time. The percent energy contribution by the auxiliary heater is increased with increase in
temperature of the drying air, as the auxiliary heater will have to heat the preheated air
from the collector by large temperature difference.
The total energy per unit mass of water ranged between 23.548 and 62.117 MJ/kg water
at the highest air temperature of 75 1C and lowest airow rate of 2.43 kg/min, and lowest
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 3
Total energy required (E
MJ/kg water
) and energy contribution of solar collector, electrical heater, and blower for
solar-assisted drying of onion
Run
no.
T (1C) v (m/s) F
r
(%) Energy contribution (MJ/(kg water)) Total
energy
(MJ/
(kg water))
Energy
saving
(%)
Solar air
heater (%)
Electrical
heater (%)
Electrical
blower (%)
1 55 0.30 00 17.941 (44.5) 16.229 (40.2) 6.193 (15.3) 40.364 00.0
2 55 0.65 00 18.586 (36.6) 24.786 (48.8) 7.438 (14.6) 50.810 00.0
3 55 1.00 00 18.996 (30.6) 35.195 (56.7) 7.927 (12.8) 62.117 00.0
4 65 0.30 00 12.031 (42.7) 11.561 (41.0) 4.609 (16.3) 28.201 00.0
5 65 0.65 00 12.403 (32.5) 20.998 (55.0) 4.802 (12.6) 38.203 00.0
6 65 1.00 00 12.562 (25.0) 32.690 (65.1) 4.973 (09.9) 50.225 00.0
7 75 0.30 00 10.088 (42.8) 09.745 (41.4) 3.715 (15.8) 23.548 00.0
8 75 0.65 00 10.994 (32.4) 19.188 (56.4) 3.799 (11.2) 33.981 00.0
9 75 1.00 00 11.545 (24.5) 31.716 (66.9) 4.092 (08.6) 47.353 00.0
10 65 0.30 25 09.255 (39.6) 09.488 (40.6) 4.642 (19.8) 23.385 16.4
11 65 0.30 50 07.536 (37.9) 07.499 (37.7) 4.841 (24.4) 19.875 29.0
12 65 0.30 75 04.668 (28.0) 06.814 (40.9) 5.915 (31.1) 16.676 40.4
13 65 0.65 25 11.095 (37.0) 14.049 (46.9) 4.831 (16.1) 29.975 21.5
14 65 0.65 50 09.870 (40.9) 09.309 (38.6) 4.927 (20.5) 24.106 36.9
15 65 0.65 75 06.987 (37.1) 06.438 (34.2) 5.426 (28.7) 18.851 50.7
16 65 0.65 90 03.495 (22.4) 06.308 (40.4) 5.820 (37.2) 15.623 59.1
17 65 1.00 25 12.568 (32.4) 21.123 (54.5) 5.085 (13.1) 38.777 22.8
18 65 1.00 50 11.319 (38.4) 13.052 (44.2) 5.146 (17.4) 29.517 41.2
19 65 1.00 75 08.473 (39.5) 07.229 (33.6) 5.688 (26.6) 21.351 57.5
20 65 1.00 90 04.473 (25.3) 06.934 (39.2) 6.290 (35.5) 17.697 64.8
21 75 0.30 25 07.456 (39.3) 07.802 (41.0) 3.734 (19.7) 18.992 19.6
22 75 0.30 50 05.661 (36.5) 05.998 (38.7) 3.846 (24.8) 15.505 34.3
23 75 0.30 75 03.580 (28.2) 05.061 (39.9) 4.048 (31.9) 12.690 46.3
24 75 0.65 25 10.432 (38.1) 13.129 (47.9) 3.846 (14.0) 27.407 19.4
25 75 0.65 50 08.205 (39.1) 08.918 (42.4) 3.899 (18.5) 21.022 38.1
26 75 0.65 75 05.684 (37.7) 05.299 (35.2) 4.080 (27.1) 15.064 55.7
27 75 0.65 90 02.692 (22.4) 05.067 (42.1) 4.281 (35.6) 12.040 64.6
28 75 1.00 25 09.634 (26.2) 23.018 (62.6) 4.099 (11.2) 36.751 22.4
29 75 1.00 50 08.973 (33.1) 14.005 (51.7) 4.102 (15.2) 27.080 42.9
30 75 1.00 75 07.104 (39.3) 06.786 (37.5) 4.097 (23.2) 18.087 61.8
31 75 1.00 90 03.878 (28.0) 05.413 (39.0) 4.581 (33.0) 13.872 70.7
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2543
air temperature of 55 1C and highest airow rate of 8.09 kg/min, respectively. This suggests
that from energy point of view, the drying should be undertaken at higher permissible
drying air temperature and lower airow rate. As the airow rate increased from 2.43 to
8.09 kg/min, the total energy required increased by 53.9%, 78.1%, and 101.1% at 55, 65,
and 75 1C of the drying air temperature, respectively. Likewise, as the drying temperature
increased from 55 to 75 1C, the total energy required decreased by 41.7%, 33.1%, and
23.8% at airow rates of 2.43, 5.25, and 8.09 kg/min, respectively. The effect of airow rate
and drying air temperature on total energy required is also shown graphically in Figs. 11
and 12, respectively. Total energy required increased with increase in airow rate and
decreased with increase in drying air temperature.
The total energy required per unit mass of water during recirculation of air is also given
in Table 3. It can be seen from the table that the total energy ranged between 12.040 and
38.777 MJ/kg water removed. It can be seen that the total energy decreased with increase in
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
T
o
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Air Mass Flow Rate (kg/min)
Fig. 11. Effect of airow rate on total energy required (&: 55 1C; +: 65 1C; J: 75 1C).
55 60 65 70 75
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
T
o
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Air Temperature (C)
Fig. 12. Effect of air temperature on total energy required (&, 2.43 kg/min; +, 5.25 kg/min; J, 8.09 kg/min).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2544
fraction of air recycled. This clearly indicated that with proper choice of drying air
parameters one could reduce the energy requirement for drying of onion signicantly.
Fig. 13 shows the effect of air mass ow rate on total energy required at different
fractions of air recycled for 65 1C drying air temperature. The total energy required
increased with increase in air mass ow rate at all the levels of fraction of air recycled.
Likewise, Fig. 14 shows the effect of fraction of air recycled on the total energy required at
different airow rates for 75 1C drying air temperature. The total energy required
decreased with increase in fraction of air recycled.
The percent saving of total energy required for drying of onion slices per unit mass of
water removed by recycling of the drying air can be calculated by comparing the obtained
values of total energy required with the respective values of zero percent fraction of air
recycled and is also given in Table 3. Savings in energy up to 70.7% can be achieved with
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
T
o
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Air Mass Flow Rate (kg/min)
Fig. 13. Effect of air mass ow rate on total energy required at different fractions of air recycled for 65 1C air
temperature (W: 0%; : 25%; J: 50%; +: 75%; &: 90%).
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
T
o
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
M
J
/
k
g
w
a
t
e
r
)
Fraction of Air Recycled (%)
Fig. 14. Effect of fraction of air recycled on total energy required at different airow rates for 75 1C air
temperature (&: 2.43 kg/min; +: 5.25 kg/min; J: 8.09 kg/min).
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2545
recycling of the hot exhaust air (for T 75 1C, _ m 8.09 kg/min, and F
r
90%). It is
observed that savings in energy increased with increase in the fraction of air recycled,
airow rate, and drying air temperature. Percent contribution of energy provided by the
solar air heater ranged between 22.4% and 40.9%. Percent energy required by the electrical
back-up heater and blower ranged between 33.6% and 62.6%, and 11.2% and 37.2%,
respectively.
4. Conclusions
The developed solar-assisted forced convection dryer operated well for dehydration of
onion slices for the controlled conditions of drying air temperatures and airow rates
similar to those employed in commercial onion dehydration. The dryer is also facilitated
with recirculation of exhaust air. The total energy required for drying of onion slices
increased with increase in airow rate and decreased with increase in drying air
temperature. For drying of onion slices from initial moisture content of about 86%
(w.b.) to nal moisture content of about 7% (w.b.), the total energy required per unit mass
of water ranged between 23.548 and 62.117 MJ/kg water during without using any
recirculation of air. The percent energy contribution by the solar air heater, electrical
heater, and blower to the total energy requirement ranged between 24.5% and 44.5%,
41.0% and 66.9%, and 8.6% and 16.3%, respectively.
The total energy required for drying the onion slices ranged between 12.040 and
38.777 MJ/kg water for the experiments conducted using partial recirculation of exhaust
air. The percent contribution to the total energy required by the solar air heater, electrical
back-up heater, and blower ranged between 22.4% and 40.9%, 33.6% and 62.6%, and
11.2% and 37.2%, respectively. Total energy decreased with increase in fraction of air
recycled. The maximum savings in total energy up to 70.7% can be achieved with recycling
of the hot exhaust air.
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges to the vice-chancellor for deputation granted to him
by the Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushi Nagar (Gujarat), India.
References
[1] Sodha MS, Chandra R, Pathak K, Singh NP, Bansal NK. Techno-economic analysis of typical dryers.
Energy Convers Manage 1991;31(6):50913.
[2] Bhatnagar S, Ali Y. An overview on design of solar dryers for drying of agricultural and food products. In:
Mathur AN, Ali Y, Maheshwari RC, editors. Solar drying. Udaipur, India: Himanshu Publications; 1989.
p. 6777.
[3] Pawar VN, Singh NI, Dev DK, Kulkarni DN, Ingle UM. Solar drying of white onion akes. Indian Food
Packer 1988;42(1):1528.
[4] Harner JP, Lambert AJ, Baker JL, Vaughn DH, Steele JL. Improving peanut curing efciency with air
recirculation. ASAE paper no. 81-3545, St. Joseph, MI 49085: ASAE; 1981.
[5] Cook DF, Cundiff JS, Vaughn DH. Energy savings from air recirculation in peanut curing. ASAE paper no.
82-3574, St. Joseph, MI 49085: ASAE; 1982.
[6] Young JH. Energy conservation by partial recirculation of peanut drying air. Trans ASAE
1984;27(3):92834.
[7] Chung JH, Verma LR, Mailander MP. Simulation of a rice drying system. Trans ASAE 1991;34(5):206572.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2546
[8] Soponronnarit S, Achariyaviriya S, Tasaso P. Optimum strategies for drying papaya glace. ASEAN Food J
1992;7(1):1723.
[9] Soponronnarit S, Dussadee N, Hirunlabh J, Namprakai P, Thepa S. Computer simulation of solar-assisted
fruit cabinet dryer. RERIC Int Energy J 1992;14(1):5970.
[10] Soponronnarit S, Nuimeem M, Bunnaag B. Maintaining qualities, minimizing time and energy consumption
in pineapple glace drying. RERIC Int Energy J 1993;15(1):3348.
[11] Lal G, Siddappa GS, Tandon GL. Preservation of fruits and vegetables. New Delhi: ICAR; 1986.
[12] Rapusas RS, Driscoll RH, Srzednicki GS. Bulk density and resistance to airow of sliced onions. J Food Eng
1995;26:6780.
[13] Sarsavadia PN, Sawhney RL, Pangavhane DR, Singh SP. Thin layer drying behaviour of brined onion slices.
J Food Eng 1999;40:21926.
[14] Kiranoudis CT, Maroulis ZB, Tsami E, Marinos-Kouris D. Equilibrium moisture content and heat of
desorption of some vegetables. J Food Eng 1993;20:5574.
[15] Wilhelm LR. Numerical calculation of psychrometric properties in SI units. Trans ASAE 1976:19(2):
318321, 325.
[16] Lunde PJ. Prediction of average collector efciency from climatic data. Sol Energy 1977;19:6859.
[17] Ting K, Shove GC. Daily efciency of at-plate solar air collector for grain drying. Sol Energy
1983;31(6):6057.
[18] Sarsavadia PN. A study on drying behaviour and application of solar energy for dehydration of onion. PhD
thesis. Devi Ahilya University, Indore, India, 2000.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.N. Sarsavadia / Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 25292547 2547