22 views

Uploaded by James Rait

This is to make sure people are aware of an excellent book

- Efficient Propeller Design
- Spar Design of a Fokker D-VII _ Aerospace Engineering Blog
- Ramya Mini Project Editing
- Div Class Title Numerical Study of the Steady State Uniform Flow Past a Rotating Cylinder Div
- MSES.pdf
- lift in sacs.pdf
- Probability and Confidence Intervals
- SACS LIFT
- A Novel Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design for Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
- 14217 Instructor Guide
- r860.pdf
- Seagull
- wing theory exercise.pdf
- airplanes presentation
- 203990781
- WireRopeSlingGuide
- Chapter-5 (Welding) 29-35.ppt
- Lecture 21
- Unnamed2_HEA280
- All Recent Govt Job Question Till 5 July 2018

You are on page 1of 4

You Will Never Understand Lift

By Peter Garrison / Published: Jun 04, 2012

Related Tags: Pilots, Adventures & More, Peter Garrison, Technicalities

Circulation is hinted at by a computer-

generated map of velocities imparted to the

surrounding air by a passing wing.

Enlarge Photo

You will never understand lift. Forget it. You havent got a chance.

So I muttered to myself as I closed a fascinating book called The Enigma of the Aerofoil. The

author, David Bloor, is an emeritus professor of the University of Edinburgh whose field is

the sociology of science: how cultural and personal factors shape the acquisition and use of

scientific knowledge.

Bloors story, which unfolds like a genial Foyles War-style slow-motion whodunit from the

BBC, concerns the efforts of scientists and mathematicians in the ivory towers of England

and Germany between 1909 and 1930 to understand how wings produce lift. Their work went

on parallel to, and largely insulated from, that of manufacturers and aeronautical engineers,

who built tens of thousands of airplanes without worrying about why wings worked. They did

that was all that mattered.

The sense in which scientists understand something is not the sense in which you and I do.

We know what it feels like to stick a hand out the window of a moving car, to sail a boat or to

carry an umbrella on a windy day. These are direct, elemental experiences, familiar since

childhood, and we have no difficulty extrapolating them to the wings of airplanes. We

understand lift by empathy: We feel it.

But that is not the kind of understanding that exercised the giant brains of Cambridge and

Gttingen. They were not Impressionists. To them, understanding wings meant finding the

mathematical laws that govern them and that would allow accurate prediction of their

behavior. These laws were elusive. Not that much of the grunt work hadnt already been

done: Mathematical descriptions of the behavior of frictionless ideal fluids under highly

prescribed conditions had been developed in the 18th century by Leonhard Euler and our old

pal Daniel Bernoulli. But real air is not a frictionless fluid; there, so to speak, is the rub.

The basic difference is that an ideal fluid lacks viscosity, and air has it. In viscosity-free air

there would be no drag and no lift. Any force produced as the wing pushed the air aside

would be exactly neutralized as the air sprang back into place. Obviously, this was not what

was happening, since real wings produce real lift and real drag. Where were they coming

from?

In Bloors narrative, the British and the Germans approached the riddle from different angles.

It was not just a matter of national character, however. Rather, it was that the British brains

who worked on the problem were pure mathematicians in the last degree, mostly drawn from

among the highest-performing survivors of Cambridge Universitys merciless tripos

examinations, while the Germans came from their countrys system of technical upper

schools, in which it was not considered uncouth to take an interest in practical aspects of a

problem.

The great difficulty concerned something called circulation theory. This is an approach that

emerges from the readily observed fact that an airfoil slows the air passing below it and

accelerates the air above it. The difference in speed bends the airflow behind the airfoil,

angling it slightly downward. This small downward (or backward, in the case of a propeller)

movement of a large amount of air because the rapidly moving wing influences thousands

of cubic feet of air per second produces the reaction that we call lift or, in the case of a

propeller, thrust.

It was possible, if you made the right set of assumptions, to get the circulation model to

predict real lift quite accurately. The trick was to think of the flow of air past an airfoil as a

circular motion superimposed upon a horizontal one. This was mathematically convenient,

because methods existed for computing rotary and straight-line flows, and they could be

combined. It was actually an Englishman, a plebeian polymath named Frederick Lanchester,

who originally proposed a circulation theory of lift in the 1890s and connected the circulation

to the rotation of the tip vortices. In modern terms, Lanchester pretty much had it right. But

the tripos set looked down its collective nose at him; after all, Lanchester had gone to a

technical school.

The stumbling block in the circulation approach for the British thinkers was that ideal-fluid

theory provided no means of inducing a circulation in the first place. Ideal fluids were

inherently circulation-free. Circulation was mathematically illegal. Thus, the fact that real

wings displayed behavior that could be accounted for by a circulation theory, far from

gratifying the Cambridge idealists, put them into a moral and intellectual dilemma. The worst

of it was that they possessed a key that should in principle have unlocked the problem for

them, but they could not get it to work. That key was a set of equations describing the

behavior of a viscous fluid, which air really is. Unfortunately, these so-called Navier-Stokes

equations were so complicated that no one could solve them.

German aeronautical research, centered at the University of Gttingen, achieved a better

balance of the ideal and the practical. Less afflicted with the mathematical purism that

paralyzed the British, it managed to build a bridge between the ideal and the real. The bridge

was in many ways a makeshift, but it worked; you could get across it.

The German work was inaccessible to the British during the war. Only after the end of

hostilities in 1918 did German technical publications begin to find their way to the English-

speaking countries. It then slowly dawned on the British that, while they had been banging on

a door that refused to open, the Germans had gone around the corner to find another one

unlocked.

Gttingens central figure was Ludwig Prandtl, who possessed a remarkable gift for turning

empirical observations into useful mathematical approximations. While the British obsessed

about the extremely difficult problem of stalling their grail was a theory that would

account for the behavior of an airfoil at any angle of attack Prandtl had focused his

attention upon the small range of angles of attack that were actually of interest to the makers

and flyers of airplanes. Within that range, he was able to deduce a number of simple formulas

that still form the basis of aeronautical analysis and performance prediction today.

The contribution for which Prandtl is most famous is the concept of the boundary layer.

Within the boundary layer, viscosity dominates; outside it, the air behaves in a way that

closely approximates a frictionless ideal fluid. The presence of the boundary layer in effect

changes the shape of an airfoil, and in doing so resolves the discrepancy between the ideal

and the real. It is largely to Prandtls insights that we owe the modern ability to accurately

simulate, with digital computers, the behavior of still-imaginary airplanes.

As late as 1925, one of the British theorists, Richard Southwell, told the Royal Aeronautical

Society, I suppose no problem is so fundamental as the question Why does an aerofoil lift?

We can hardly rest satisfied with the present position which is, we have next to no idea.

The general equations of motion for a viscous fluid ... are about the most intractable

equations in the whole of mathematical physics. At the time Southwell said these words, the

problem had been solved for all practical purposes. Still, he wasnt wrong; in the terms of

pure mathematical analysis in which the British had framed the problem, lift remained as

mysterious as ever.

What makes Bloors book so interesting to me is the detailed and lively picture it paints of

how the thinking of groups of people can be subtly circumscribed by certain preconceptions,

conventions and mutual influences groupthink, if you like and by the way the

problem is initially framed. For those top-hatted British boffins, however pigheaded and

obtuse some of them may look in retrospect, were extremely brilliant men. England threw its

best and brightest at the problem of lift, and they failed to unravel it.

Today we pilots are inclined to talk, and even argue, about lift in terms of a Newtonian

action/reaction the wing pushes air down, the air pushes back or else in terms of the

relationship between local flow velocities and surface pressures, which vary inversely in

accordance with basic physical laws that were identified by Bernoulli, though they no more

belong to him than gravitation does to Isaac Newton. These explanations, as far as they go,

are correct, but they dont go far. We are tots in a sandbox compared with the titans who laid

siege to the stronghold of lift and were driven back. We do not understand lift; we merely talk

about it.

Read more at http://www.flyingmag.com/pilots-places/pilots-adventures-more/you-will-

never-understand-lift#cFGZQQDELGgm1tBX.99

Read more at http://www.flyingmag.com/pilots-places/pilots-adventures-more/you-will-

never-understand-lift#mocB74Yq0WGw1wYO.99

- Efficient Propeller DesignUploaded byAditi Bapusaheb Sabnis
- Spar Design of a Fokker D-VII _ Aerospace Engineering BlogUploaded byjohn mtz
- Ramya Mini Project EditingUploaded bySailavanya
- Div Class Title Numerical Study of the Steady State Uniform Flow Past a Rotating Cylinder DivUploaded bymanish
- MSES.pdfUploaded byMatteo Limongelli
- lift in sacs.pdfUploaded byBolarinwade
- Probability and Confidence IntervalsUploaded byKing Everest
- SACS LIFTUploaded byBolarinwade
- A Novel Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design for Small Horizontal Axis Wind TurbinesUploaded byFajar Hidayat
- 14217 Instructor GuideUploaded byShibarpan Bhattacharjee
- r860.pdfUploaded byalexrodriguezabc
- SeagullUploaded byNishanth_Joel__9936
- wing theory exercise.pdfUploaded bythanesh01
- airplanes presentationUploaded byapi-252890211
- 203990781Uploaded bySanjay Kumar
- WireRopeSlingGuideUploaded byvenkannaraot8888
- Chapter-5 (Welding) 29-35.pptUploaded byLois Miguel Bonifacio
- Lecture 21Uploaded bymurdicks
- Unnamed2_HEA280Uploaded bySerkanAydoğdu
- All Recent Govt Job Question Till 5 July 2018Uploaded byAli Nowroz
- aeroplano[1]Uploaded byJose Luis M
- 1-sAeroelasticdesignoptimizationofthin-walledsubsonicwings against divergenceUploaded byrahman10191871
- Design of Cotter JointUploaded by1blank
- aiaa-2015-1711Uploaded byympark0525
- Some EquationsUploaded byChintia
- actas de matematicas de la universidad fenieceaeUploaded byChecoz
- The Aerodynamics of an Inverted Wing and a Rotating Wheel in Ground EffectUploaded byVyssion
- 1-7 appendiksUploaded byFaizah
- Investigating the Suitability of Selected Structural Material for the Blade of an Horizontal Axis Wind TurbineUploaded byAZOJETE
- Assignment 7 SolutionUploaded byHéntor Rivera Salgado

- Egerton to Larsen- test pilots separated by a centuryUploaded byJames Rait
- Osa Information Pack 2013 Version RevisedUploaded byJames Rait
- Tradeoffs in Jet Inlet Design: A Historical Perspective by András SóbesterUploaded byJames Rait
- Proteus Icing ProblemUploaded byJames Rait
- blog-jetsUploaded byJames Rait
- Stability in the Air-Egerton to Larsen-Master-180909Uploaded bytartle

- Traducción FAR 45 ESPUploaded bymowli_777
- book ferUploaded byFernando M. Castillo
- Design of a Low-Cost Easy-to-Fly STOL Ultralight Aircraft in Composite MaterialUploaded bymycrowsobt1
- Effect of weight on stall speedUploaded bypp2076
- F-15 vs Su-27Uploaded bymishanbgd
- A-18 Ababeel (AVD Final Report)Uploaded bynoor_mujahid
- How to Make a Rc PlaneUploaded byKunal Garg
- Vultee A-31 VengeanceUploaded byAviation/Space History Library
- Principles-of-Flight-Test.pdfUploaded byali4957270
- AeroelasticityUploaded byÁlvaro Arroyo Parejo
- Uncertainty Analysis of Various Design Parameters on Winglet PerformanceUploaded byZakria Toor
- Preliminary Wing Design Parameter Selection Rev 3.pdfUploaded byvirgilio
- A Mbs FlyingUploaded byamr kourany
- Aviation Fundamentals 1 - FlightUploaded bypp
- 483000main_ModelingFlight (1)Uploaded byMatheus Monjon
- Basic Engineering BookUploaded byDrPrashant Shihora
- How Airplanes Fly_ a Physical Description of LiftUploaded byÁlvaro Sorel
- Acd Lab ManualUploaded bydestro29
- 11.Mechanical Properties of FluidsUploaded bySivaramakrishnaNalluri
- Aerodynamics GlossaryUploaded bydbrcs
- Aerodynamic Analysis of Dimple Effect on Aircraft WingUploaded byAndrew Martin
- AIAA-2006-503-799.pdfUploaded byAndrei Verdeanu
- Hovercraft DesignUploaded byapi-26088064
- 01 MA4878course-Layout 4SPPUploaded byFeeling_so_fly
- Aerofoil wingUploaded byPowerhouse Museum
- Experimental_and_Applied_Mechanics__Volume_4.pdfUploaded byYawei Li
- chapter 1 aircraft construction and materials chapter objective.docUploaded bySalvador Morales
- 065Uploaded byKrishnamoorthy Krishnan
- FrereJonesType RetinaUploaded byAmo
- Influence of Aerodynamic Parameters in the Design of the AircraftUploaded byDivya Srinivasan