Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4:9
p
3weight (kg)
3
jump height m:
q
Although the Lewis formula has been
widely used for years, more recently its
validity has been questioned compared
with directly measured power outputs
determined via force plate data (9).
Harman et al. (9) provide the following
formulas for the calculation of peak
and average power:
Peak power W
5 61:9$jump height cm
36:0$body mass kg 1; 822
Average power W
5 21:2$jump height cm
23:0$body mass kg 21; 393:
Extensive normative data for both ver-
tical jump height and power are avail-
able (10).
STANDING LONG JUMP
The standing long jump is a measure
of horizontal leg power. Its strengths
are ease of administration, low equip-
ment requirements, and extensive
availability of normative data, ranging
from adolescent athletes to college
football players participating in
the National Football League combine
(10). The test requires that the athlete
perform a countermovement, fol-
lowed immediately by a jump for max-
imum horizontal distance (Figure 2; see
Video, Supplemental Digital Content 2,
http://links.lww.com/SCJ/A67, which
demonstrates the standing long jump
test). Procedures for performing the
standing long jump can be found else-
where (10).
WINGATE ANAEROBIC CYCLING
TEST
Whereas technically a laboratory
test, the Wingate anaerobic cycling
test (WAnT) requires relatively inex-
pensive equipment and is widely
used by coaches and sport scientists
alike (3). The WAnT consists of 30
seconds of maximal effort cycling
against a resistance that represents
a predetermined percentage of the
athletes body weight (Figure 3;
see Video, Supplemental Digital Con-
tent 3, http://links.lww.com/SCJ/A68,
Figure 1. Vertical jump test.
Measuring Power
VOLUME 34 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 2012
26
which demonstrates the Wingate anaer-
obic cycling test). Peak anaerobic power,
mean anaerobic power, and fatigue index
may then be calculated from this single
30-second test. The maximal power out-
put achieved during any 5 second time
period (typically the rst 5 seconds) rep-
resents peak anaerobic power and is pre-
sumably reective of the maximal power
output of the ATP-PCr energy system.
Mean anaerobic power is the average
power output calculated from the entire
30-second test. Although dependent
upon both the ATP-PCr and anaerobic
glycolytic energy systems, mean anaero-
bic power is thought to be primarily
reective of the latter. Fatigue index com-
pares the highest 5-second power output
(peak anaerobic power) to the lowest
5-second power output, usually the last
5 seconds of the 30-second test. The
fatigue index is not a measure of power
per se. However, higher fatigue index
scores are associated with higher percen-
tages of fast twitch muscle bers, and this
information may be of interest
to coaches and their athletes.
MARGARIA-KALAMEN STAIR
CLIMB TEST
The Margaria-Kalamen stair climb test
is a popular anaerobic step test. It
requires a 6 m horizontal run, followed
immediately by climbing 9 steps verti-
cally, 3 steps at a time (the athlete
steps on stairs 3, 6, and 9) (Figure 4;
see Video, Supplemental Digital Con-
tent 4, http://links.lww.com/SCJ/A69,
which demonstrates the Margaria-
Kalamen stair climb test). Power may
then be calculated using the athletes
weight (body mass in kg), the horizon-
tal distance climbed (from steps 3 to 9),
and the time it takes to climb this dis-
tance. The accuracy of the test can be
improved by using an automated tim-
ing system, such as switch mats placed
on the third and ninth steps, rather
than a handheld stopwatch. Because
the test is very short in duration, it
primarily relies on the ATP-PCr energy
system for performance. For details on
how to perform the Margaria-Kalamen
test, see appropriate reference (10).
BOSCO POWER TEST
The Bosco power test consists of
jumping as high and rapidly as possi-
ble for a duration between 15 and
60 seconds (5) (Figure 5; see Video,
Supplemental Digital Content 5,
http://links.lww.com/SCJ/A70, which
demonstrates the Bosco power test).
Average power is then determined for
the specied time period. Because of the
relatively lengthy duration of the test, it
is often said to represent power endur-
ance or the ability to perform high
power movements repetitively. One
possible drawback of the Bosco power
test is that vertical jump height is deter-
mined from ight time. This requires
that the athlete perform the test either
on a force plate or a switch mat. None-
theless, the test results correlate well
with a modied 60-second WanT and
60 m run while also reecting the ability
to use stored elastic energy during the
jumping movements (5).
Figure 3. Wingate anaerobic cycling
test.
Figure 4. Margaria-Kalamen stair climb
test.
Figure 5. Bosco power test.
Figure 2. Standing long jump test.
Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com
27
POWER CLEAN/POWER SNATCH 1
REPETITION MAXIMUM
It is well known that weightlifters are
among the most powerful athletes in
the world (1,7,11,13). It comes as no
surprise, then, that the exercises con-
tested in the sport of weightlifting, the
snatch and clean and jerk, as well as
their variations, are widely used by
coaches and athletes wishing to
increase power. In addition to being
used as training exercises, these exer-
cises are also used as measures of
power (high speed strength) (2)
through the determination of a one
repetition maximum (1RM) (Figure 6;
see Video, Supplemental Digital Con-
tent 6, http://links.lww.com/SCJ/A71,
which demonstrates the power clean
and power snatch 1RM). It should be
emphasized, however, that the power
clean and power snatch exercises
are technique intensive movements.
Therefore, the athlete should be able
to demonstrate procient technique
before being tested for 1RM on
one or both of the exercises. Testing
the 1RM of an athlete who has
not developed appropriate technique
will not likely yield a true measure
of power.
CONCLUSIONS
A number of tests for anaerobic power
have been presented. These tests have
proven to be valid, reliable, and objec-
tive. In addition, norms are available
for each test so that the strength and
conditioning professional can compare
the results of their athletes with others.
When possible, coaches should select
tests that are biomechanically similar
to the movement patterns common
in their sport.
Jared W.
Coburn is a pro-
fessor of Kinesi-
ology at
California State
University,
Fullerton.
REFERENCES
1. Akkus H. Kinematic analysis of the snatch
lift with elite female weightlifters during the
2010 World Weightlifting Championship.
J Strength Cond Res 26: 897905, 2012.
2. Baechle TR and Earle RW, eds. Essentials
of Strength Training and Conditioning.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
3. Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An
update on methodology, reliability and
validity. Sports Med 4: 381394, 1987.
4. Beam WC and Adams GM. Exercise
Physiology Laboratory Manual. New York,
NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
5. Bosco C, Luhtanen P, and Komi PV. A
simple method for measurement of
mechanical power in jumping. Eur J Appl
Physiol Occup Physiol 50: 273282,
1983.
6. Brodt V, Wagner DR, and Heath EM.
Countermovement vertical jump with drop
step is higher than without in collegiate
football players. J Strength Cond Res 22:
13821385, 2008.
7. Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ,
Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC,
Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, and
Stone MH. The relationship between
vertical jump power estimates and
weightlifting ability: A eld-test approach.
J Strength Cond Res 18: 534539, 2004.
8. Coburn JW and Malek MH, eds. NSCAs
Essentials of Personal Training.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012.
9. Harman EA, Rosenstein MT, Frykman PN,
Rosenstein RM, and Kraemer WJ.
Estimation of human power output from
vertical jump. J Appl Sport Sci Res 5:
116120, 1991.
10. Hoffman JR. Norms for Fitness,
Performance, and Health. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2006.
11. Hoover DL, Carlson KM, Christensen BK,
and Zebas CJ. Biomechanical analysis of
women weightlifters during the snatch.
J Strength Cond Res 20: 627633, 2006.
12. Morrow JR, Jackson AW, Disch JG, and
Mood DP. Measurement and Evaluation in
Human Performance. Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2011.
13. Stone MH, Byrd R, Tew J, and Wood M.
Relationship between anaerobic power
and Olympic weightlifting performance.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness 20: 99102,
1980.
Figure 6. Power clean/power snatch 1
repetition maximum.
Measuring Power
VOLUME 34 | NUMBER 6 | DECEMBER 2012
28