Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
0903 1 1228 0
1228 0 0343 0
. .
. .
F
Mass matrix,
(
=
2
1
0
0
m
m
] M [
Fig.A1.2 Modeling of Tower
Appendix A1 111
572 . 1
1
= T s
106 . 0
2
= T s
, 96 . 0 , 5 . 0 , 0 . 1 , 0 . 1 , 0 . 1 = = = = =
g s s
T D I Z B
g
T T >
1
From (3.2)
1
T
T
D I Z C
g
s s
= I Z . .
s
3 0 305 0 > =
52 683
2 1
. W W W = + = kN
47 208. W C Q
d
= = kN
B / Q Q
di ei
=
From (3.4)
=
=
=
n
m
m m
n
i m
m m
d di
h W
h W
Q f
1
Fig.A1.3 Lumped Mass Model
56,121 kg
13,626 kg
34,673 kg
Appendix A1 112
(2) Modal Analysis
The flexibility matrix and the mass matrix are obtained from the model shown in Fig.
A1.3(b) as follows:
| |
(
(
(
=
2404 7 1415 1 1265 0
1415 1 0903 1 1228 0
1265 0 1228 0 0343 0
. . .
. . .
. . .
F
33
=1/K
2
is added to
33
from stiffness coefficient, where K
2
is the spring
constant for the convective mass.
| |
(
(
(
=
3
2
1
0 0
0 0
0 0
m
m
m
M
1 d
Q =157.09 kN < 0.3Z
s
IW =205.02 kN
Stresses in modal analysis are obtained by multiplying with
1
3 0
d
s
Q
IW Z .
as follows:
1
3 0
d
s di
ei
Q
IW Z .
B
Q
Q =
Table.A1.3 Q
ei
Obtained by Calculations
Table.A1.4 Natural Periods, u, and C
47
th
Appendix A1 113
Table A1.6 Calculation of Qei and Mei
modified lateral force
mode method
story shear Overturning
A1.3 Water Pressure Imposed on the Tank
Impulsive mass (water),
39 . 69
21 . 56
) (
1 2
= =
d
e e
W
Q Q Q kN dy Rd P =
Table.A1.5 Q
ei
Obtained by calculation
Table.A1.6 Calculation of Q
ei
and M
ei
Fig.A1.4 Comparision of Stresses obtained using the Modified
Seismic Coefficient Method and the Modal Analysis
modified seismic coefficient method
modal analysis method
shear force
bending moment
mass
Appendix A1 114
Convective mass (water),
77 . 89 ' = Q kN dy Rd P =
Height of wave due to sloshing; from (7.9),
= |
.
|
\
|
=
D
h
g
D
B
S I Z
s
s
682 . 3
tanh
802 . 0
1
1.104 m
m/s 758 . 1
2 . 1
1
11 . 2
1
= =
S
A1.4 Wind Loads
(1) Wind loads
Wind loads are obtained from chapter 6 Wind Loads of Recommendations for
Loads on Buildings (2004), AIJ.
a) Design wind speed
Basic wind speed 36
0
= U (m/s)
Height Coefficient
205 . 1 0 . 1 205 . 1 = = =
g r H
E E E
From exposure II,
5 =
b
Z m, 350 =
G
Z m, 15 . 0 =
Fig.A1.5 Water Pressure due to Sloshing
Appendix A1 115
205 . 1
350
35 . 35
7 . 1
15 . 0
= |
.
|
\
|
=
r
E
Return period conversion coefficient
952 . 0 9 . 3 9 . 2 ) 1 ( 63 . 0 = + =
u nr u rw
I k
Return period 50 = r years, 111 . 1 /
0 500
= = U U
u
Design wind speed at standard height
29 . 41 952 . 0 205 . 1 00 . 1 36
0
= = =
rw H D H
k E k U U (m/s)
b) Design velocity pressure
040 , 1 29 . 41 22 . 1
2
1
2
1
2 2
= = =
H H
U q (N/m
2
)
Air Density 22 . 1 = (kg/m
3
)
c) Pressure coefficient
From 68 . 7 6 . 4 / 35 . 35 / = = D H
Z 5m,
2 14 . 0
2 1
75 . 0 6 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 1 |
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
= =
H
Z
D
H
k k k C
b
Z D
400 . 0
35 . 35
0 . 5
75 . 0 7 . 7 6 . 0 2 . 1
15 . 0 2
14 . 0
= |
.
|
\
|
=
28.28m > Z > 5m,
3 . 0
3 . 0
14 . 0
2 1
247 . 0
35 . 35
75 . 0 7 . 7 6 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 1 Z
Z
k k k C
Z D
= |
.
|
\
|
= =
Z28.28m,
672 . 0 8 . 0 75 . 0 7 . 7 6 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 1
3 . 0 14 . 0
2 1
= = =
Z D
k k k C
d) Gust effect factor
exponent for mode shape 2.500
total building mass M 104420kg
generalized building mass M
D
84644kg
0.633
mode correction factor
D
0.174
turbulence scale at reference height L
H
108.6m
turbulence intensity at reference height Ir
H
0.158
Appendix A1 116
topography factor for the standard deviation
of fluctuating wind speed E
I
1.000
topography factor for turbulence intensity E
gI
1.000
gI H H
E Ir I = 0.158
gust effect factor
natural frequency for the first mode in
along-wind direction f
D
0.713Hz
damping ratio for the first mode in
along-wind direction
D
0.010
C
g
0.457
k 0.070
C
g
0.127
R 0.386
F 0.075
S
D
0.404
F
D
0.033
R
D
2.593
v
D
0.606
g
D
3.604
gust effect factor G
D
2.044
e) Wind load
A G C q W
D D H D
=
Z5m
A A W
D
= = 850 044 . 2 400 . 0 040 , 1
28.28Z5m
A Z A Z W
D
= =
3 . 0 3 . 0
525 . 0 044 . 2 247 . 0 040 , 1
Z28.28m
A A W
D
= = 429 , 1 044 . 2 672 . 0 040 , 1
(2) Wind load for vortex oscillation
a) Calculation model
In this example, the calculation model is assumed to have the shape shown in
Fig. A1.6, and the water content is assumed to be empty.
Appendix A1 117
Natural period T
1
,
From | |
(
=
7952 0 1111 0
1111 0 0343 0
. .
. .
F
726 0
1
. T = s
| |
(
=
2
1
' 0
0
m
m
M
b) Calculation of wind load for vortex oscillation
The possibility of vortex oscillation is checked according to Chapter 6 Wind
Load of the Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (2004), AIJ as follows.
Fig.A1.6 Calculation Model
16,156 kg
13,626 kg
Table.A1.7 Sectional Forces by Wind Load in the Along Direction
D D H
G C q
1.+29
1.+29
1.+29
1.+28
1.31
1.30
1.23
1.11
1.022
0.80
0.80
33.0+
3.8
39.21
++.3
2.2
9.8
bb.89
+.+
8+.8b
9.
101.8
2.9
13.3
12.b+
332.30
20.+0
3.b1
9b.+1
1312.+
1b9+.b1
212+.b8
Appendix A1 118
A
H
Z
C U W
r r r
2
8 . 0 =
in which,
18 . 15 2 . 2 38 . 1 5 5 = = =
m L r
D f U (m/s) : resonance wind speed
where,
38 . 1 =
L
f : natural frequency of water tower tank (Hz)
22 . 1 = (kg/m
3
) : air density
3 . 35 = H (m) : tower height
20 . 2 =
m
D (m) : diameter at the level 2/3 H
03 . 4 =
r
C : pressure coefficient in resonance
)
`
> = =
> = =
0 . 5 1 . 20 02 . 0 142
0 . 6 4 . 33 2 . 2 18 . 15
L s
m r
D U
then, 03 . 4
57 . 0
= =
L
r
C
02 . 0 =
L
: damping ratio of water tower tank
142
4 . 3 2 . 2 3 . 35
600 , 37
=
=
=
B m
s
D D H
M
(kg/m
3
)
600 , 37 = M (kg)
Then,
A Z A
Z
A
H
Z
C U W
r r r
= = = 7 . 25
3 . 35
03 . 4 18 . 15 22 . 1 8 . 0 8 . 0
2 2
(N)
The cross section of the tower should be designed with the composite force of
obtained from the wind load itself and the wind load for vortex oscillation
Appendix A1 119
Table.A1.8 Forces Caused by Wind Load Vortex Oscillation
Section forces in wind
along direction
Composite forces
Table.A1.9 Forces List
Axial
force
Seismic
(modified seismic
coefficient)
Seismic
(modal analysis)
Wind in
along dir.
Wind for vortex
oscillation
Full Empty
H
C
U
r
r
2
8 . 0
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
19.b1
1.
1.+
1.88
3.b3
3.09
2.b
2.+0
2.3+
1.2
0.0+
19.b1
21.18
22.92
2+.80
28.+3
31.2
3+.08
3b.+8
38.82
+0.3+
+0.38
2.203
1.80
0.90
3.b0
3.b0
3.b0
3.b0
+.0
+.0
+.0
0
+3.20
81.32
101.9
191.23
293.8
+0.0
29.+
b93.90
8b8.9
100.12
33.0+
3.8
39.21
++.3
2.2
9.8
bb.89
+.+
8+.8b
9.
101.8
2.9
13.3
12.b+
332.30
20.+0
3.b1
9b.+1
1312.+
1b9+.b1
212+.b8
39.+1
+1.bb
+.+2
0.81
9.+8
b.8
.0
83.1
93.32
103.3
109.0
8+.b+
19.b2
200.0
383.+0
9.0
8+0.2
1110.8b
1+8+.8
190+.2
230.02
3.8
39.21
++.3
2.2
9.8
bb.89
+.+
8+.8b
9.
101.8
2.9
13.3
12.b+
332.30
20.+0
3.b1
9b.+1
1312.+
1b9+.b1
212+.b8
21.18
22.92
2+.80
28.+3
31.2
3+.08
3b.+8
38.82
+0.3+
+0.38
+3.20
81.32
101.9
191.23
293.8
+0.0
29.+
b93.90
8b8.9
100.12
Appendix A1 120
Table.A1.11 Design of Section
Table.A1.10 Section Properties and Allowable Stresses
Long term
Seismic
Full water tank (modified seismic coefficient method)
Full water tank (modal analysis)
Appendix A1 121
2.9
13.3
12.b+
332.30
20.+0
3.b1
9b.+1
1312.+
1b9+.b1
212+.b8
3.8
39.21
++.3
2.2
9.8
bb.89
+.+
8+.8b
9.
101.8
0.203
0.8b9
1.092
1.38
2.0+
2.891
3.338
2.09
2.10
1.823
0.010
0.0+0
0.00
0.0b
0.088
0.12+
0.1+2
0.121
0.100
0.089
0.102
0.1b3
0.13
0.13
0.1b1
0.199
0.20
0.182
0.13
0.13
0.119
0.19b
0.222
0.191
0.18
0.20
0.200
0.190
0.1b8
0.1+
0.02
0.02+
0.02
0.019
0.01
0.019
0.018
0.021
0.022
0.02+
8+.b+
19.b2
200.0
383.+0
9.0
8+0.2
1110.8b
1+8+.8
190+.2
230.02
+1.bb
+.+2
0.81
9.+8
b.8
.0
83.1
93.32
103.3
109.0
0.23
1.010
1.2b9
1.+
2.3+8
3.30+
3.98
3.0b+
2.+1b
2.03+
0.012
0.0+b
0.08
0.08
0.101
0.1+2
0.1b1
0.13
0.113
0.099
0.032
0.090
0.108
0.13
0.1b8
0.233
0.2b1
0.22
0.189
0.10
0.139
0.22
0.2+
0.21
0.209
0.232
0.223
0.209
0.182
0.18
0.029
0.028
0.031
0.021
0.019
0.022
0.020
0.023
0.02+
0.02b
0.0+3
0.0+2
0.0+
0.032
0.029
0.032
0.030
0.03+
0.03b
0.039
Wind with full water tank (in along direction)
Wind with empty water tank (for vortex osc.)
OK
OK