1

Structure: How We Made Happiness

By

Hope, Ora Ora Tiferetot, Ora, Stephanie, Penelope, Tob
Shbeeb, Tatania, Jenny, Arielle, Kelly, Pekhot, Grouchy,
Yafah, Kabbalah, Marion, Kathleen, Marbah, Donna,
Valerie, Shnoonah, Diana, Bertha, Shay, Amy, Marilyn,
Elaine, Teresa, Lizzie, Libby, Honey, Richard, and Billy
McBride
2








Copyright 2010, by William McBride

ISBN 978-0-557-53788-4

3






Dedicated to Marbah with Hesed
4






1.

(A.) Me notes map bebroughten into me beguiled sentences
follows a belettered resequencing of a down recycling. Me
resequencing of all thirty-four felt sentences of me Isaacs
dialectics by which a beguiled rain process of writing an
additional twelve further rain processes for us bringeth us
to a belightened evaporation process a little as one beeth
writing an uphill full thirty-four and six besentenced lovely
scene. Uncertainty must belightenedly occureth before the
scene becrookedly can starteth.

5






(B.) Me mensuration beeth a process beloved which
explaineth me Terahs togethereth letter, his writing while a
soupy writing in full of a rain or befallen method of a page
of the uphill twenty-three sentences beeth beassembled.

6






(C.) In me evaporation, me Terahs loud letter beeth a rain-
process of writing a fully rain-processed page betied as me
Abrahams young poem attempteth me resequencing or me
beguiled recycling of the truth of me thirty-four truthful
sentences using eleven theses and, wholly, some new
synonyms down for change. How passeth and why beeth
this attempted?

7






(D.) Me truthful notes map bebroughten into me felt
sentences beeth me resequencing of me recycling as me
Isaacs dialectics beeth what me Isaac useth to revise me
Abraham and me Terah true, his father and good
grandfather.
8






3.

(A.) In me wilderness, me berained page by me Terah
beeth made by me digression and by me healing
argumentative. Tis me rain down to cometh without
prelude.

9






(B.) Me Terah reorders the coming page hence he hath
freedom more to beeth at work with greatly. This
happeneth with more limitation, me doth see.

10






(C.) A page may be befilled when me high argumentative
beeth over. This page beeth a wonder blank.

11






(D.) Also me Terah spendeth a double-hundred or so
patient words to complete the twenty-three good sentences.
These good sentences begin fragmatically.

12






(E.) Tis a process besparked to take a timeth of fourty-three
minutes. But, what beeth me bemirrored process, and how
dost me bemirrored process elaborate me to beeth
expressive.

13






(F.) The result beeth me islandish miracle. Me cause twas
me miracle to beeth greatly transitory.


14






4.

(A.) During me process of writing out eleven theses, me
Avraham chooseth twice-eleven sentences for me Terahs
page to cometh. Me Terah giveth over forever that page for
me Avraham angelic.

15






(B.) Tis me sentence that he putteth aside twas one that
beeth unlinked with me pairs of me twice-eleven in me
mind. To createth me pair, me sentences beeth given
canonically designated values which beeth alike, and beeth
beplaced into me pairs in me dreams. When thou addeth to
anything, tis thou relationships created to beeth still an
illusionary being that thou unity of addition beeth
impossible rigorously.

16






(C.) Next me pair beeth what me Avraham useth to createth
one new thesis out from me eleven writ. There beeth nary
option for him, for he cannot crosseth any boundaries
which cannot beeth crossed powerfully.



17






5.

(A.) Revenge-dialectics are a nightmare, a kind of
information-fool theory, YES, whereas, the Psalms of
David, they come down and are a kind of negative
technology-sayer theory.


18





(B.) Coming down, this is the shining difference of a war
between criticism and poetry, between astonishing Isaac
and King David. The gentleman Yitsak and King-sayer
David are not that closely related.

19






(C.) The difference is, yet, that the coming down of Psalms
makes a translation of what makes nightmare-information
or rather the evil givens, mindless.

20






(D.) And, the study of nightmare-information is what
comes of nothing as it turns the concrete into the abstract
and then, scholarly, back into the quest for the concrete.
Poetically, once these turns are made, one can spiritually
never return to ones crossed origins.

21






(E.) Suicidally, this is through a pure process which is not
ahistorical. What revenge is this? And, how does the
revenge of this become best used?

22






(F.) That is why the banal revenge-dialectic is seen more as
a coming down of a construction to be very well translated
into poetic terms of art by the poetic Psalm. Some consider
a grandiose poetic form a poetic Psalm, yet, they, in truth,
are mistaken because the vocabulary of a poetic form is the
abstraction.

23






6.

(A.) There are in time four driven old revenge-processes.

24






(B.) These are the revenge-processes of cold rain, far
evaporation, patient interpretation, and birth-recycling.
These revenge-processes do not wait to exist.

25






(C.) In time these revenge processes become more
perfectly concrete after we yield to and substitute the free
images for ideas. The separated past is greater than the wit
of and sensed quantity of the time of the future. These free
images separate from the difficult Minds perfection
forever.

26






(D.) This is the what Abram made in the way that David
sublimely corrects. David, perhaps, in his calling, contrary
to your history, did or did not descend represented from
Abram.

27

28





(E.) And, by this day, from this descendance is how one
especially becomes a descendant, by a hated correction. In
this calling, this change is a tales error.

29






(F.) Each sentence has a well word, like, when born, each
well paragraph has a sentence. Not every fathers sentence
is a fathers sentence.

30






7.

(A.) The revenge dialectics of Yitsak study the Books
argumentative ways. Creative arguments become ignored
by the sports of us.

31






(B.) The coming-down Psalms of the seer David are, by his
method, sacred songs.

32






(C.) Completely sacred ideas can be complete ritualistic
ideas. The concrete completion of all rituals engenders the
loss of all of our profanities.

33






(D.) And, the loss of our ritualistic ideas is in no way of a
certain poetic order. Therefore, no way is ritualistically
certain.

34






(E.) The coming-down Psalms of the seer David study the
laws of the creativity of born Terah, born Abram, born,
Yitsak, born Yakov, born Yosef, to himself. Whos sport is
he? And, for thou, how does he let be himself, and why
does he fit concretely in?

35






(F.) Love, it is a concrete study of a bitter influence, a
study to read of misread creations. To hear and to create
are love, to act original.


36






9.

(A.) The songs of me David touch me Isaacs labors, and
they beeth soft grasses, skillful grasses, and skillful songs
of me mind. The better that one singeth, the less becometh
it ones true song of fire.

37






(B.) The songs of me David touch the gardeners who beeth
for soft grasses, as skillful grasses may beeth formed into
skillful songs powerfully. There will occur a time when me
singing wilt not beeth so difficult to crosseth.

38






(C.) A touching of the fruit to the seed beeth a good
touching; and tis thus a touching of me gardenings and soft
grasses beautiful. The grasses beeth something to beeth
thought of in me mind.

39






10.

(A.) Me Terahs writ beeth likened to his shape making.


40






(B.) Me Terahs music beeth done in a raineth way. The
rain stayeth up above.

41






(C.) Me David can maketh a Psalm; and, he can
additionally inspire me Isaac to maketh a dialectical.

42






(D.) Me Jacob must studyeth the remarkable idea of
Vicoean creativity.

43






(E.) Me Vico sayeth that tis me creative by me poet that
beeth the only thing which he understand. Tis in his act of
saying whence he becometh confused.

44






(F.) Tis me map-matrix that beeth formed for specifically
me Isaac and me Jacob together. To formeth something, it
beeth useful nary to addeth hence to it; tis to beeth left be.


45






11.

(A.) Tis me seemingly random process, me raindropping.
Tis to seemeth that everything hath a purpose.

46






(B.) Tis also me process to beeth notetaking. Tis this
process which beeth standing alone.

47






(C.) And, tis me raindropping of Terah which can beeth in
comparison to me notetaking of me Jacob, and of me Isaac.
Me notetaking becometh me literal act of translation.

48






(D.) Also, me Isaac doth figure out me contradictions
which so beeth in opposition to me praise.

49






(E.) Me praise beeth what me Jacob intendeth for his
descendents. How and what kind of praise beeth given?

50






(F.) Me Joseph and me King David beeth me Jacobs
descendants who learned how to praiseth. Giving praise
taketh no effort for them.


51






12.

(A.) Me forces beeth me abstractions. There beeth nary
such things as me forces, depending.

52






(B.) They beeth twice-fixed by me Isaac within his
framework of me Abrahams poem-map. Me framework
can nary beeth in repetition so that new ideas mayeth be.

53






(C.) And, to me Abraham, as me forces beeth abstract in
me poem-map, so beeth me forces in me abstractive in me
stereotomical.

54






(D.) There beeth many stages in me stereotomical. Me
stereotomy mayeth be defined as me process of bereducing
a single form.

55







(E.) Tis too me construction which beeth concretical,
abstractical, resequenced, and recycled back into me
concretical. Me concretic essences must nary beeth shared.

56






(F.) Yonder construction processes beeth me very elements
of me study of me stereotomical. Thou dost nary have to
worketh hard whilst in thy study.

57






13.

(A.) Me Jacob doth in truth maketh me dealings in me
forces. Yet, his actions beeth in sincerity.

58






(B.) Me Joseph dealeth with all of his right power; and, me
King David maketh me forces of me forces into me rest.
Me poor Joseph.

59






(C.) Me verbs beeth me forces sometimes. What doth
beeth else but yonder me immobile verbs?

60






(D.) Thus, from me Terah to me David me forces beeth
used. What beeth forces How doth me forces get put into
me play?

61






(E.) But, me force can beeth contained which beeth me
Davids skill. Me force alone beeth all, nary else beeth in
inclusion.

62






(F.) Me containment can neither hap by me writ nor by me
means of me scuplt of me mass. Me writ beeth nary me
way but an impossibility of me deed.


63






15.

(A.) This instant me Jacob-notes, a sign of me notes map,
mighty lost beeth to become for me Isaac.

64






(B.) Land! Me Jacob-notes in time! even to be faced
protothesis for me fountain of me Abraham. Waters me
protothesis so bloody actual; so there is me beauty, so no
need to worry or to care if they be twinkly of mine options;
unlocketh them as they are met!

65






(C.) But, for me Joseph, me Terah, and me King David, me
Jacob-notes so dyeth in use defendingly in me different
way beformed that all me ways me beareth, leadeth to the
idea that methinks in me divinity me notes be cripple all in
the same in me bewooden way.

66






(D.) For meanest me King David, me Jacob-notes beturn
into thy divided song that mine ole Jacob-notes changeth
not to mine own periods.

67






(E.) For me Joseph, ladies, me Jacob-notes are brought by
me infantude to thy abstraction,a besung contemplation
bewarred, that there in me low, be me action and me way,
be in abstraction winkily.

68






(F.) And ripe! for me Terah, me Jacob-notes, a version of
me Terahs echoing individual word-beheld fragments,
eternal so writ me moaneth in thy usual rainy process that
the fierce, only beseen, fragments existing be thine
betaught ones of which me draweth, alas, and none, so, so
help whatsoever thine to promote.


69






16.

(A.) Me Jacobs singing notes becometh abstracted fiercely,
but me Jacobs-notes indeed ameet take out me abstractive
meself as their subject and their matter. Me Joseph spareth,
and neither giveth the troop nor recieveth!

70






(B.) Therefore, with me ferocities such the subject-going
matter, me Joseph-quester belearneth iher own way to
know that to me Joseph there be not pursued so real a path,
but, lo!, methinks there may be one beheld.

71






(C.) Astandeth me sentences by me Jacob menstruated,
recycled, resequenced. How presume thou that they be
resequenced? Come now, what exactly doth happen i
thine eyes?

72






(D.) Then me majesty, King David doth learn by me
Joseph; and much doth write me new sequence that
breaketh into song alive. Me song be me voice periodic
from early past, so me hunch canst be bestorily recorded.

73






(E.) Tis a berounded traditional follows astriven me one
which me Abraham angelically begun by writ iluck. A
poem-map cometh, which be me part of a resequencing
bemoaned of me Terah.

74






(F.) Wither Isaac doth cometh the same too? How
powerfully be he so done? Who, to all, doth he thinketh
ihumanity be he?


75






17.

(A.) Me dialectics be winded be very longeth. Me
meditations not me be winded dialectics be periodically
longeth fed. Me myself besprinkled beeth fixed upon this
sunny point which be begentled.

76






(B.) They me feareth be longeth because me navigator,
Isaac bestudies fatherdom nerdly in depth. Fatherhood be
in conclusion befriended to be me surfacing of me best
meditations. This periodically be me eloquent bepiled
statement being beformlessed.

77






(C.) Me Isaacs writs beframe me Abrahams standed
poeticals. So whoso really maketh me Isaac? How must
doth me Isaac beareth relation clear to me other? Tis nary
played memorable, yet splendidly tis familiar to me in me
thoughts.

78






(D.) Me beautified map that it giveth in me framework be
me map of besubistuted done variables. Thus, when writ
me names on me map into gold bechangeth. Tis of water
strongest; and tis best benary of invention.

79






(E.) To useth creatively me map taketh me beskilled
dedication. Tis foolishly easy to giveth madly me thou
love. Me doth wonder why for good me sayeth such, yet
me angelisms art of importance, me thanked me God, to
utter.

80






(F.) Tis what linketh featly in me Isaac to me Joseph, me
bestranged outsider. What be more of beauty and why nary
becovenanted to taketh the time periodically to seeketh for
such as mine; thus shalt teach we?


81






18.

(A.) Thereafter me way categorically opened to me to be to
heareth for me to hear the hung sound of me words and to
associateth it in immediate height with nother words.
There art nary such things bekingdomed as thy words.

82







(B.) Me beareth such me next thing to do hedgingly be to
taketh me associated beruined words and to figureth me
hedging out-side, and wherefor falleth it befooled upon me
map.

83






(C.) Me bulwarked associated words art beglorified that
hath bejavelined in limitation me now a number because as
me breathe, as me Isaac practiceth, less art in need to be
associateth, aye. Thou in thy feeding hath nary to haveth
to decline to thyself at all any reason in thy own anxieties
as to betossed why for art thou studieth.

84






(D.) Hereaft bespinning me findeth whereat me belayed
words falleth, me Isaac now knoweth why for and whereat
me awrestled words standeth in me resequentation. Me be
withered knowledges to be becometh of all of us hath, to
thou, orders bespinning of which tis an impossibility
beheld to me to comprehended.

85






(E.) Catagorically me Abraham be nary done just in silence
by me resequencitations, but also in me finding of me
beechoed genralizations of places, thine bevisual places of
thine places, yes. These echoes of thine places canst be in
thy unions only to to beeth bebuilteth recitationly when me
hath beseparated them from betearing part one nother.

86






(F.) To be beknowing of whereat me Abrahams kindheart
sayings art alocated beeth, in thine own beginnings, to
understandeth in thy person how to frameth them writs
with me bedelivered dialectations. This mine usefulness of
me words doth justify their asinging skills besoothened.


87






19.

(A.) Me paintings revealeth a greatness in thy signification.
Such me paintings behideth to me thy fact of their
begreyed bedullment bewithered in thine bewildered
unimportances.

88






(B.) There art as well many of me paintings bequeathed
which art either to be me reduction or in me posterity to be
me interpretive chant. We of the kingdom hath no choice
left of which beyondered future will cometh in thine
echoes.

89






(C.) Me paintings echoing canst be besubsituted for me
other interpretations. Me paintings mirrored badly only to
themselves.

90






(D.) Such bebroughten painting be me Josephs bebattled
realm. Aye, much in disappearance hath beoccurred in me
competitive.

91






(E.) And, mindfully me criticism thy misseth be for me
Jacob, me Joseph and me King David courageous to doeth.
Tis a bemarbled disappearing takes me begaped efforts.

92






(F.) Me paintings of thy troop connecteth me imagery
beintimidated with me ideas, but me bringeth these in ideas
which art nary mine own.


93






20.

(A.) Me biographical livelihood be of importance. To
liveth partially be to dieth unpleasantly.

94






(B.) So up art me ancient day stories beluxuried with me
interpretive to come which me canst not connect. Tis me
ancient be tossed stories that doth pointeth out to me
somethings.

95






(C.) And, in thy readings so art me other stories,
methodical post-Miltonic, which doth me giveth to bedrive
me interpretive, which me toucheth upon. Nary me
bemoaned that me story canst describeth me beshavened
somethingeth befeated or some event, or, Lord, some place.

96






(D.) Tis me fatherly eloquence of me interpretive and
forthward of me intertextual which doth maketh bitterly me
a way in me understanding of me beruined selfhood which
in thou love thou doeth. Why heavens, actually, me in me
method doeth that and thou doeth bejudge not that
bebittered.

97






(E.) Also, yea, even beyond me stories art me styles that
me beloveth in me callings of me own pens writ. Me style
doth falleth to be beexpresseth by me sailing ignorance of
me writ.

98






(F.) But, me styles bedarkened of me writ art wonderously
what Nature in a truth bebroken mayeth beeth. Nature
bescurries to beeth to thou illusionative!


99






21.


(A.) It wert behanded from me Tolstoy to me knoweth me
Jacob belearned forthward how to composeth longer in
autobiography. Me Tolstoys buzz be stopped teaching
long long for us ago.

100






(B.) Me Richard in his beguilement wert to beeth his
besorrifulled tutor on berolling me Tolstoy. Then me
Tolstoy doth becometh the tutor.

101






(C.) Me Richard in his recline sayeth that we knoweth that
we needeth gurus, but nary beneedeth priests. Priests of
beheighteness art besilented people, tis true.

102






(D.) This greatly mightst relateth towards a bewithering of
me Tolstoys Rousseauism. Me Tolstoy hadst bewithered
and had heldeth nary beliefs.

103






(E.) Me Richard in his barity also wouldst beeth in
dispitutation best with me Tolstoy over the arts of the
besignificances hived of bechanged vocabularies make
change?

104






(F.) Bout me Hadji Murad, why he be Tolstoys bested,
bestranged, and beshortened story. Tis his mortal best; tis
yet wherefor there to cometh?


105






22.


(A.) Me Harold betrooping Bloom sayeth this that,
crookedly, because, here and there, me betrippings in me
schizophrenias, me cancers, and me holocausts, tis a
goingeth uphill and a hardness to believeth in the existence
of any part of me God. God who be blown be befainted.

106






(B.) Bewandering, whyfor?

107






(C.) Me numbers bestanding canst neither beeth addeth
reflexively to me be questionings nor beeth subtracted
from, nor beeth divideth, and else in finality nor beeth
multiplied.

108






(D.) Tis me curious Ein Soph which beeth me Primordial
Adam felteth, who beeth unbefallen, and me God in
accordance becreatured me Kabbalists. Me all-be
knowing, thou, God liveth be.

109






(E.) Me meditations over in me beobservations of me twice
thrice gardeners be an undertune of what beeth men of
importance for the be distinction to me Jacob. What in me
comings must beeth done atumbling but action and help?


110






23.


(A.) Fiercely me Rorty bekept can beeth bedemanded to
beeth me Joseph.

111






(B.) Slowly me Tolstoy can beeth me Jacob actor wholly
Tolstoy doth not haveth bedropped of any choice.

112






(C.) Me Genius, me Harold Bloom, can be me Avraham.
My dove, sayeth that he would rather beshingingly existeth
than upeth pre-exist.

113






(D.) On break, me Avraham usefully can also beeth in this
world me Rorty because of his bescratching of his eleven
bespun theses which on the boat reflecteth me Rortys
eleven besaid intellectual theses.

114






(E.) Me Tolstoy betrailled be me Jacob; and me soul, me
Freud, me Joseph. Me bequesth that me Tolstoy has no
besaddened name.

115






(F.) Lastly this remindeth of a gift of me David thinker, that
his paintings of flowers beeth an illumination abstracteth
over bewhitened abstractions. Specific instances
beshadowed, and bebroughten or begeneraled-way notions
beeth nary helpful.

116






(G.) Falling thus me King David may beeth much me
Rousseau, me Henri Rousseau. And, we seeth, me
Rousseau beeth nary truthfully becalled Rousseau
anymore.


117






25.


(A.) That from clinging to me Isaacs blessings to what me
shorter workings beeth the path that plenty will leadeth to
new letters. Lonely, the walled up future dost not
rhythmically taketh us anywhere this night if we do not
follow.

118






(B.) Tis best that me organizing of me books, that me writ
in me dimness, leadeth to me organizing of me dim books
in me library. Disorder befallen becometh order.

119






(C.) Hey! me Joseph teaches the pragmatics of
resequencing. Me Joseph materially falleth from his
duties.

120






(D.) Resequencing the coming of me Terahs rain dropped
beguiled page beeth good for me Avraham. Resequencing
beeth with everything, a repeating of an episode.

121





(E.) However, lonely, to reviseth me Avraham, me falling
Isaac resequenceth, with his own sentences, peacefully me
Avrahams resequencing of sentences. Peacefully me
Avraham doeth nothing in his own mind.

122






(F.) Beautifully the teachings of doing so beeth
pragmatically because today the mocking son must goeth
yonder to beguile the dim fathers read writ. In ofference,
no son beeth crookedly in debt to his father.


123






26.

(A.) Me rain of me words cometh first. By me rain I
mean me dropping.

124






(B.) Then tis me rain of clauses before me mensuration,
me recycling, and me resequencing which cometh next.
One beeth unable to put me a limit to yonder rhythms.

125






(C.) Me rain sentences by using me a map cometh last.
Tis me rain mayeth ruin me map.

126






(D.) Me Abraham raineth me sentences and me causes.
Me sentence doth nary follow me sentence. Nay that any
sentence followed another.

127






(E.) Then me Terah raineth me words. Me Terah
followeth nary system and therefore he doth not maketh
any progress.

128






(F.) And, me Isaac rains more of me rained words, first,
into me clauses and, second, into me sentences, while me
Joseph rains me clauses and me sentences. Me patriarchs
beeth in existence far beyond our own time, and they doth
beeth not in simultaneity with it nor with each others.


129






27.

(A.) Me library of me Terah beeth situated. By me library
me meaneth to say me study-place.

130






(B.) Me Terahs library consisteth first of all of his rained
pages which art uncollected.

131






(C.) And, second, me Terahs library consisteth of me early
early work BEFORE THE PAINTINGS. What cometh
before beeth me mystery.

132






(D.) In BEFORE THE PAINTINGS tis reined with some
organization and evaporation. It cometh all; it wilt nary
raineth again.

133






(E.) In me rained pages there beeth nary any particular
evaporations or orderings. Where doth it hap? Why doth it
hap in that place?

134






(F.) That beeth what makes it close to me King Lears style,
and whay it must beeth me revision by me Avraham. Thou
needeth nary reasons to giveth any reasons.


135






28.

(A.) Me library of me Jacob beeth besituated. Me libraries
beeth just places, tis all.

136






(B.)Me Jacocs library consisteth, first, of me SHUFFLED,
second, of me SINGLE LAD et caeteraand, third, of me
UNCOLLECTED NOTES. We let the books beeth.

137






(C.) Me SHUFFLED beeth just a part of me entire notes
which beeth me Jacobs. Tis a whole to beeth in existence
when me parts containeth me parts within me parts.

138






(D.) Me SHUFFLED beeth in me volume one, also called
THE PROJECT. I only calleth by its one name.

139






(E.) As SHUFFLED beeth organized belightly and
bechaotically, SINGLE LAD et caetera following
consisteth of me visionary poems. These beeth me poems
which doth have nary parts.

140






(F.) Tis me rest of Jacobs library to consisteth of me notes
which sometimes helpeth David by way of me Joseph, and
besometimes nary. What doth remain beeth something
which we have nary choice in me experiencing.


141






29.

(A.) Me libraries of me Joseph and of me Abraham beeth
situated. Tis me libraries which beeth in always change.

142






(B.) Me Josephs library consisteth of the mapped non-
rained organized notes. Me maps beeth hard to readeth!

143






(C.) Me non-rained notes beeth me volumes by me author
Solomon Bloom which beeth not rained.

144






(D.) Me Solomon Bloom also becometh Abraham when me
notes which beeth rained beeth in me organization as in me
AT THE GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES. Me concept of
rain beeth literal language only, what else could it beeth?

145






(E.) Me Isaacs library beeth what me Joseph reviseth.
What beeth this what??

146






(F.) Me Abraham reviseth me Terahs rained pages in AT
THE GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES. He keepeth his
notes to himself.

147






(G.) Me Joseph reviseth some of Jacobs notes. Tis these
notes which beeth thus in completion.

148






30.

(A.) Me libraries of me Isaac beeth situated. Me Isaac can
haveth a library but he stayeth at home.

149






(B.) Me Isaacs library consisteth of me DIALECTICS.
Me Isaac stayeth at home.

150






(C.) Me DIALECTICS beeth revisions of me revisions.

151






(D.) Me DIALECTICS reviseth Abrahams writ of AT THE
GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES, and me few
UNCOLLECTED WRITINGS also by A braham. Me
revisionary process can hap only once in me time.

152






(E.) Me Isaacs library beeth what Jacob reviseth. Men
reviseth women; women reviseth men.

153






(F.) Me Jacob does this nary literally, but in a new way, by
revealing me structure of me influences of me fathers upon
me creations.


154






31.

(A.) Me Davids library beeth in situation.

155






(B.) Me Davids library consisteth, first, of his PSALMS,
second, of his SERMONS, and, third, of his early short
work which he calleth THE UNEASINESS OF THE
MOON. Nary a one belistens to his sermons.

156






(C.) In me PSALMS, me David transforms me Jacobs
ideas of influence into beimagery. Me influence cometh
from me stars.

157






(D.) In me SERMONS, me David uses me style of Horace
to learned about me writs structure while becoming
confident for me sake of me own study of me notes. Nary
one becometh beconfident who tis not already.

158






(E.) And, in THE UNEASINESS OF THE MOON, me
David begineth to seteth me imagery in me motion with a
paean to the M.O.A.T., to James Joycean visionary
paintings, and to drawing chaotically.


159






(F.) Me UNEASINESS OF THE MOON also allows me
David to seeth me beginning structure of me experience
and of me image-replacing which beeth a kind of
evaporation method. We doth not haveth any control over
what may beeth seen.


160






32.

(A.) Me Terah provideth me a skeleton bestructure for me
David to giveth to me Jacob who doth giveth it back to me
David upon working upon it.

161






(B.) He giveth who provideth, me Terah doth. He giveth
me a gift of nothing.

162






(C.) What beeth the big gifts of me skeleton structures,
which beeth only what Jacob seeth when he beeth
receiving?

163






(D.) Me provision of me pattern cometh because me Jacob
holds out his hands for a gift to beeth given yon this time.

164






(E.) Shalt me David bereturneth to giving to beeth beuseful
again? Why asketh nothers questions for which there
beeth no answer?

165






(F.) When me gardeners happily shareth, it mayeth be that
me Jacob, as me gardener, beeth never done. Only one
gardener canst ever completeth his task.

166






(G.) Me David beeth nary worrisome over me Jacob about
what beeth bevalued to me David in those many givings.
Thou dost not have to accepteth what thou art given.

167






33.

(A.) To me poem-maps events and notes, let them beeth
me antitheticals and me theticals. Me names on me maps
causeth me places to existeth.

168






(B.) And, yet me dialectics may beeth me events and me
notes bout a larger event of a new set of notes over a
newly beborn antithetical. Tis this story beeth very old.

169






(C.) Tis this new dialectical event beeth me Jacobs, beeth
me scene, bestudied. Nary anybody careth bout me new
ideas any more.

170






(D.) In me event of me Isaacs combined with me Jacobs
notes beeth larger events that me Jacob formeth by analogy
after being compared side by side with me Isaac when me
Jacob beframeth and beexpands his volumes studies of
events and comparisons. Only the beblinded can compareth
me forms accurately.

171






(E.) Being that me Joseph worketh, the volume existeth.

(F.) As for me Josephs becollecting of his volume and
others, tis the event for which an even larger scene formeth
because it beeth a total study of these events because me
Jacob respondeth to me Terah, and me Abraham, to me
Isaac, to me Joseph, and to me King David. There beeth
nary a reason whatsoever for what hap.

172






34.

(A.)Yet, me result of me intertextual study beeth that a
tenfold Serifot can beeth in implication; and, tis it which
becometh a new Adam. Tis the result which beeth final.

173






(B.) Me meditation over nothing, nary thoughts, existeth.
Tis nary really bout anything.

174






(C.) Me permutation tis what dost this by its tool. Our
tools beeth primitive.

175






(D.) And, from nothing cometh belief which beeth rain for
me. Beliefs becometh powerless.

176






(E.) Either with me unbelief me four kinds of interpretation
are me literal and me figurative, or they beeth nary when
they beeth mystical and expository. Only one at one time
mayeth fill a space sayeth a wise man.

177






(F.) So me combineth these four for one sentence when this
beeth me method of me thetical creative.


178






36.

(A.) Me criticism leadeth me back to me belief. What
beeth criticism? How and why wouldst any nother
maketh any criticism?

179






(B.) Me criticism, which meaneth me Aristotle, seperateth
me contradictions; and tis this which beeth also me
Hegelian.

180






(C.) Me sentence criss-crossing, adding formulas to me
series, one sentence standeth alone, mayeth many build up
more for me possible scholarships crit; and, tis it which
maketh me second of me cycle. All cycles beeth beblanded
and bemudded.

181






(D.) A through K beeth me eleven pairs. Me eleven
pairs maketh eleven theses. Addeth one single and you
hath twice-seventeen.

182






(E.) Most of me poems which me write beeth Romantic or
Romances (me genre). Me hath never writ me poem.

183






(F.) Accepting me eleven theses meaneth accepting the
order of the word choices of me entire poem; and, tis this
which can also beeth looked at in reverse: accepting the
order of me poem means that me eleven theses beeth
coherent.

184






37.

(A.) Me notes can beeth read aloud, bepublished, or what
hath thou; and, tis this which beeth me fifth stage. Me
publication beeth me way to destroy mine ideas.

185







(B.) Me notes mayeth be made into a type of poem if thou
looketh at them as me proto-notes. Nary a one hath ever
actually seen my notes.

186






(C.) Decoding the first word that popeth into thine mind
when looking at thou word, thou sentence, or thou clause
beeth a kind of association which beeth translated into one
of me solitaries on me Map of Misprison.

187






(D.) Me giveth that word me number which correspondeth
to me appropriate symbolic solitary in me map (me
matrix). Why doth me giveth it? How beeth it given?

188







(E.) Me maketh me cycle/sequences for all three of more
microcosms or macrocosms. Me three beeth enough.


189





38.

(A.) Me Monuments Across Texas beeth me metaphor for
me idea of putting shapes within me form, which beeth me
part of me stereotomical, me first level of me six.

190





(B.) Tis this which beeth necessary to thinketh of me proto-
poem (rain) or letter as something that in itself encourageth
reading because even it, in its first stage, has some order,
sequence, and use (coherence). Therefore, one either hath
all of it or nary.

191





(C.) Tis it that beeth the very reason to writeth me proto-
poem, or me good enough reason at least. Any reading
produces more uncertainty.

192





(D.) Nother type of carving beeth me stereotomical. We
hath been talking bout me stereotomical this whole time.

193






(E.) Findeth me my-poem reading sequence.

194






(F.) Findeth out me my-designing reading sequence. Me
doubt that me hath ever actually really designed anything.


195







39.

(A.) Findeth in a my-notes reading sequence. Me doth
nary keepeth any notes. Tis beeth nary the case that me
readeth one word after nother.

196





(B.) Me words acteth as parts which can subistuteth for
whole sentences. Words beeth neither parts nor wholes.

197





(C.) Me rain process in its concretic form beeth a
satirical concept. To thinketh satirically beeth forbidden.
198







(D.) Me recognize mine own usage of such technique of
me ideas in this best way to packeth in as many ideas as
possible within a limited space.

199





(E.) Only me framework shalt guideth me framework as me
dialectic. Tis this framework which beeth built which
accomplishes nothing.

200






(F.) So thus me hath me rained page. Nothing hath been
done, or shalt beeth done to it.


201






40.

(A.) So beeth it that me hath me interpretive extensions
numbering eleven.

202






(B.) Me hath me process of me thesaurus mensuration. Me
thesaurus beeth not mine.

203






(C.) Me hath me recycling process for me resequencing.
Tis me reason for me recycling which beeth an uncertainty.

204






(D.) Me hath nother rain process - Tis me notes-
fragments. All the rain cometh at once and hence shalt nary
cometh anymore.

205






(E.) Me hath me notes-recycling process after me
mensuration.

206






(F.) Me hath me notes as me framework and as me
framework-connector sentences (or interpretations). All we
or anybody ever writeth beeth ever just notes.

207






41.

(A.) Me hath me character represent, limit, and substitute,
plus beeth me narrator. Completing me catalogue meaneth
to addeth even more to it even when it beeth in completion
filled.

208






(B.) Me hath me limiter and me representative bestudy me
horizontal analogies of me matrix of me first rain extended
poem.

209






(C.) Tis this which beeth done by permuting almost all me
considerations horizontally, metaphorically of me maps,
that beeth me poems structure.

210






(D.) Me final abstractive resequenceth me twice-seventeen
final statements of me limiter, me representative, me
substituter as well as me six statements of me scene by me
narrator. Me did nary write this sentence.

211






(E.) Me scene becharteth me subject of me ratios using me
analogy of some six step construction in addition; and, tis
this construction which beeth transumed.

212






(F.) Tis me dialectic that beeth complete.


213






42.

(A.) Me notes bestudy me event that beeth me literary
event of me reading; tis this that beeth me separate event
from me rain surprise. Just because it beeth raining doth
nary meaneth that something beeth happening.

214






(B.) Yet, by comining me two different rain forms, me
event and me notes on another of me different events, tis
this which maketh for a bespecialed beisolated be
regression which bemagically undoeth me givens. To
maketh something taketh nary material, or work, for that
matter.

215






(C.) Me rain page can lead to me twenty-three sentences.

216






(D.) Me rain notes hath me twice-six sentences.

217






(E.) Me stage one mensuratioon beeth synonymical.

218






(F.) Me eleven theses useth me four types of me
interpretative. If me numbers could actually beeth useth
for anything, then me everything would already have
happened.


219






43.

(A.) Me stage two mensurateth for a resequencing of me
recycled page.

220






(B.) Me recycling of me page and me extentions which
beeth me theses maketh twice-seventeen sentences. Tis it
which beeth nothing to beeth measured.

221






(C.) Me stage three mensuration happens for me
beresequenced berecycled notes. Thou shalt never seeth
these notes.

222






(D.) Me twice-six antitheses, me substitutions notes, beeth
complete. Me completion beeth always in the process of
coming.

223






(E.) Me stage four mensurateth for me beresequencing both
for me final stage and for me final notes. Me hath forgot
about me notes.

224






(F.) Me framework beeth addeth. Whyfor? Howfor beeth
me framework done exactly?


225






44.

(A.) Me scenes beeth added as me writeth by using me
analogies voiced by me characters. The final act beeth a
real one.

226






(B.) Me dialectic beeth in me completion.

227






(C.) Me literacy beinvolves me substitutive which beeth a
kind of thinking of ideas, possibly beseparated ideas, when
me reading, when me reading beeth me event. When you
thinketh that you beeth reading you actually beeth
daydreaming instead.

228






(D.) Tis this substitutional which me calleth mine note-
map; and me event or me reading which me calleth me
note-map. Me text for me poem cannot beeth seen.

229






(E.) Each beeth rained, digressive-argumentative.
Nothing ever happened to anybody.


230






45.

(A.) Me substitutive which beeth what me reading beeth
beeth to me book, me event, beeth important to expandeth
upon because of a way that me read. Me readings never
taketh place, nor canst, nor shalt ever.

231






(B.) In me larger picture it beeth me individuals response
to me surprise which beeth great.



232






(C.) Me surprise createth me demand for me individuals
response. Yet, thou beeth never required to respondeth.

233






(D.) Tis this beeth because greatness must beeth
bemeasured; and, me substitutive beeth me measuring
beprocess. To measureth beeth the same as to beeth
inactive.

234






(E.) Combining by dialective by me scene me poem-map
and me notes-map beeth the studying of me idea of
influence between me father poet and me son poet, ephebe.
We all feeleth such influences bephysically.





235






(F.) Tis this beeth me scene of beinstruction. What tis?
Howfor and whyfor shalt one beunderstandeth it?





236






46.

(A.) To returneth to reading, literacy, me must transume me
poem-map, and nary a whole dialectic into me concept of
me poem. In order to doeth something me must nary doeth
anything.

237






(B.) Tis me note-taking which beeth me reading of me
poem.

238






(C.) So with me dialectical me hath a work of crit twixt me
father part and me son part of me.

239






(D.) Tis a kind of study of influence. We all of us beeth
influenced by the authorial.

240






(E.) Howfor the son structureth me father beeth what me
dialectic accomplisheth. Talking and/or working out me
argument doeth more harm than good.

241






(F.) Me interpretations expandeth me unit; as so me word
mayeth be me symbol for me whole sentence and mayeth
represent it. Tis these sentences beeth always
misinterpretations.

242






(G.) That beeth why tis nary necessary to taketh full notes
because even fragmentary ones mayeth be in completion;
even utterances mayeth be understood as whole
propositions, even as whole paragraphs. Nobody at all
guideth me seeing.


243






47.

(A.) Me characteristicals of me limiter, me substitutive, and
me reprehensive beeth just the aspects of me son.

244






(B.) In me dialectic me have six rain processes, two
concrete, and four menstruated (for three to beeth
resequenced, and one to beeth besynonym changed), and
from me non-rained units, three artificial structural groups
of one of me eleven theses, one of me framewoork
permutating, and one of me scenes steps, which beeth six.
Me numbers beeth ordered and remained fixed in me spots
for all me time.

245






(C.) As me scene of instruction compareth one poet with
another, so another scene mayeth compare one process of
six steps as the metaphor for another process. Nothing can
beeth allowed when such a time cometh to me available.

246






(D.) Me two recycled processes hath one proto-poem and
one note-taking literacal. Nary any whole ever hath been
separated into its parts.

247






(E.) Me twice-seventeen end relationships studied beeth of
me twice eleven metaphorical and me twice six
metalaptical, or me transumptive.

248






(F.) Of me two concretical rain processes, one beeth done
using me complete grammatical sentences and one beeth
done with me fragments. Tis there to beeth more to beeth
done after thou hath finished all of thou tasks.


249






48.

(A.) Me goal of me interpretation beeth to beeth in
coherence.

250






(B.) Tis that which meaneth that everything which beeth
valuable must beeth understood.

251





(C.) Tis this which meaneth that me work must beeth done
to followed up and to wrapeth up me instructive thinking.
Me work, therefore, beeth meaningless.

252






(D.) And, tis that which meaneth that me framework should
emergeth out of me notes which frameth me event which
doth get interpreted by me notes. Me events beeth
occurances which hap artificially.

253






(E.) Tis this me framework and me notes which beeth what
maketh up me second map. Me one map beeth enough.

254






(F.) Me first map of me proto-poem doth get menstruated,
abstracted, twice-once. Tis hard for me to keepeth track of
how many maps me beeth making.


255






49.

(A.) Me second map of me influences, me ephebes notes,
doth get menstruated twice-once. Tis these me maps which
doth nary showed me distances twixt various places.

256






(B.) And, finally, both of me maps doth get menstruated
making four betotaled mensurations in totality for me
entire dialectic. Me total dialectic beeth still in me process
of being workethed out.

257






(C.) If me mensuration beeth me rain process of me
designator numbers, then me other rain process dealeth
with either me grammatical fit of me words out of me
sequence of time, being me digressive and/or being to me
argument, or tis it which dealeth with me fragmentary note
taking in me non-temporal sequence too, but in me
completely proto-structured way. Tis it beeth it; it hath
only ever once in me actuality raineth.

258






(D.) In any case, me raining, or writ by synecdoche,
symbols, beeth nary me usual way of me writ. Me writ
beeth me act of reading.

259






(E.) Such me writ technique beeth special to understand.
Yet, me understanding beeth nary saught.

260






50.

(A.) Me ability to mensurateth entaileth me understanding
of howfor to translate me spontaneous imaginary voice into
me canonically designated number. Me hath no ability to
understand. Me Michael respecteth and beeth excited by
this.

261






(B.) Me sound of me word canst beeth heard within me
inner ear. Me sounds beeth externally beyond me listner.
Me Avraham bepondereth and beseeketh his solitude to
sayeth this.

262






(C.) Me spontaneous word connecteth to me word of me
subject and thus maketh for me mine hold. Me words
canst nary beeth fixed because they beeth too slippery for
to beest set. Me Isaac avoideth and crazeth himself over
this.

263






(D.) Me spontaneous word now after connecting to me
subject word beeth connected to me number bebased on me
understanding of me map of me misprison. All of me
conversions hap because of our abilities for us to createth
and determineth rules. Tis this which beeth sound and
clear to me Jacob.

264






(E.) Me subject and me number now hath a place. Me
subject canst nary beeth measured by me other signs. Me
saying this beeth for me Joseph beirregular and beexotic.

265






(F.) Any place can beeth used as me single within me
bigger structure, beusually of twice-three beseparated
partitions - me sentence. Me twice-three beeth small and
therefore beeth an easy number to meditateth upon. Me
David thinketh this beeth a minute and back-tracking
detail.


266






51.

(A.) What beeth me vision? What beeth me part of speech,
city of Houston, or et caetera, me pun with me cities, me fit
of it into me sentence, and all me work? Me work beeth
nary to beeth questioned; tis it to beeth ceased.

267






(B.) Me vision beeth me knowledge; tis it beeth me
neighboring states. Who beeth thou neighboring states?

268






(C.) Me part of speech, tis changeable. Whyfor tis
changeable? Howfor tis changeable?

269






(D.) Me Thalia inventeth me grammar and me parts of
speech as me Erato inventeth me twice-three steps as me
Melpomene inventeth . . . me Uraniame Polyhymnia,
translation. Yet, what beeth an inventive canst beeth
translateth.

270






(E.) Me part of me speech beeth me part of me language;
me language beeth divided into me twice-three genres: Clio
one, Thalia two, et caeteratherefore me Mousae
inventeth language. Me language beeth infinite.

271






(F.) Me Mousae inventeth me poets inspiration to
communicateth. Me poets inspiration beeth personal.

272






(G.) Me language beeth either as being poetical depending
on who it. Nary all beeth poetical.

273






(H.) Me Houston, me city close to me county; Tis Jacobean
whereas me county beeth Isaacian.

274






(I.) Tis represented by me map Tis this map which beeth
lost.

275






(J.) Me map provideth me source for choosing names of
streets, et caetera, to further punneth upon them. Me puns
doth nary lead us anywhere.

276






(K.) Me city beeth Jacobean, it becometh neighborhood,
home Jacobean, and befinally Davidian, or Knesset Yisroel.
And, tis this home that hath yet to beeth built.

277






(L). What beeth me neighborhood? Eternity, home,
splendor, and me individual Joseph, who wanteth to geteth
it right. We, our communities, beeth splendid.

278






(M). Thus, me useth me neighboorhood, Eternity, and
connected homes streets splendid to passeth out onto me
Joseph, as me individual and me covenant, who passeth me
names for me David to punneth upon, who then giveth
them to me Terah a rain maker, and to me Abraham to
sorteth things out. When me name beeth said it goeth into
one ear and yet nary reacheth its mark. Tis me gift
anonymous beeth given by nother.

279






(N.) Tis this beeth howfor me belief in me America beeth
formed when me Earth/me Knesset Yisroel beeth connected
with America, and when me America, me belief, passeth
from me twice-twenty-five states down to one, me Isaac;
me vision, which beeth in completion with me
neighborhood of states and downward to one state, me
knowledge also of me Abraham; and then me unbelief with
me Isaacs county. Tis this knowledge which mayeth nary
proceedeth further.

280






(O.) Me Jacob translateth or mediatateth after me unbelief,
with me non-knowledge, or me secret knowledge. In
translation, me non-knowledge beeth revealed.

281






(P.) Tis this beeth me city. Tis this which disappeareth.

282






(Q.) While me Isaac beeth involved in me punning-
dialogue, he tradeth to me Jacob me recitational ability
which beeth me city. Me Jacob quieteth down. We hath
forgotten the names of me streets.

283






(R.) Tis this final trade which endureth confidence, which
bringeth us back to belief, to me America, and me
Emersonianism. In me end me shalt goeth on.

284






(S.) Me America shalt transfer to me statehood of me parts
of speech, while me state shalt transfereth its energy to me
counties of me puns, me puns on me street names. Me
United States of America hath no boundaries.

285






(T.) Tis this beeth howfor me loss of me vision beturns into
me cycle. We beeth seeing this yet again.

286






(U.) Tis this beeth why me recitation must restoreth me
confidence, me America being me confidence, which shalt
creae me vision of me states, which shalt createth me
critical enthusiasm, in me counties, which beturns into me
audience for me author, whose book beeth me recitation by
which me memory silently readeth; me puns of me city
names beometh me process. Me giveth to me author me
forgetfulness.

287






(V.) Me Josephs covenant or me covenant between beings
on me level of me Joseph leadeth to me metabeyond-
unbelief. He hath run out of doubt.

288






(W.) Also, if me recitation beeth me reading for me
narrative style of me writ to practice, perhaps there mayeth
beeth nother readings. Tis called this by nary being
called.

289






(X.) Me seeth me chart. Me seeth me waste.

290






(Y.) For me rain style, perhaps, me speed reading beeth
best. Tis it beeth that there beeth nary reason for it to beeth
the best.

291






(Z.) Me rain suggesteth weather, which suggesteth me
chance and me accident. Me accidents beeth predictable.

292





(AA.) Me Psalm on me other hand beeth something else.
Me Psalms beeth yet to exist. Nothing cometh whenever
me something hap.

293






(BB.) Me readings beeth me activities. However, it doth
nary taketh any action to readeth.
294






(CC.) Me studying of me matrixes beeth me readings one
and thrice-three.

295






(DD.) Me laws of me supply and me demand govern me
readings where me writ may beeth considered as me
breaking of me vessels. There beeth nary plot to me writ.

296






(EE.) Since me writ requireth me patience, so doth reading
if both beeth to complimenteth each other. Me books beeth
usually of difficulty to readeth. But, me memories beeth
different betwixt different experiences of different authored
books as thou readest them. Experiences beeth universal to
us.

297







(FF.) Me Shakespeare, he beeth patient.

298







(GG.) Who doth me readeth when me want to write me
poem?

299






(HH.) Me literature canst beeth seen as me potential
literature. However, tis this kind of literature which goest
nowhere.

300







(II.) Me book shalt maketh me poem one way, or me
memory me narrative in nother way.

301






(JJ.) Whyfor writeth, rewriteth? To reviseth.

302





(KK.) To readeth better! Me reading yet devestateth. We
beeth to maketh more friends. Yet, we maketh nary.

303





52.

(A.) Me Jacob beeth me patriarch as here who explaineth
me system. Me Jacob?

304





(B.) Tis this which meaneth that me system must nary
beeth active to understandeth it; it must beeth frozen in me
time. Tis this beeth nary me system.

305





(C.) Me Jacobs system nary beeth me calculus, or if tis, tis
nary confused with me movement which he studieth. Me
other alternatives doth not considereth me possibility of me
reference to something more of me definitive.

306





(D.) Me Jacob beeth nary me Isaac, beeth therefore nary
interested in me changing, but howfor me change changeth.
Nothing remaineth me same.

307





(E.) Thus, me Jacob beeth regular.

308





(F.) Me Jacob doth not improviseth upon me ideas before
him in one way, but he doth describe them, and yet tis me
description which beeth me improvisation that advanceth
but nary beeth in completion. To addeth beeth one way
nary to describeth.


309





53.

(A.) Instead of being me system, me descriptions, or me
ideas after me Isaacs, they beeth seen as me knowing of
me system. Me reality beeth nary known.

310





(B.) To knoweth me system, me Jacob analyzeth me
various and me finite parts of it. What beeth me variety?

311





(C.) If me system doth nary have any parts then it couldst
beeth described by me Jacob. Me hypothetical questions
maketh me progress to ocureth or to beeth understood.

312





(D.) In other words me system beeth me synthetic
construction which hath me life, which means that it hath
me mortality like any other vocabulary. What beeth it to
mean something?

313





(E.) To recognizeth and to accepteth it beeth to seeth
howfor without it there couldst beeth nary description
because there beeth little time for it. Howfor beeth me idea
of me non-explaination conveyed?

314





(F.) And, as me vocabularies beeth mortal, me descriptive
and me prescriptive, thus so beeth me patriarchs; and, me
Josephs and me Davids concretic garden beeth illusionary
unless thou beeth in agreement that it canst beeth saved
from me time by me ongoing process of me active
meditation. Me patriarchs beeth real.


315





54.

(A.) To categorizeth any subject beeth possible. Howfor
dost me categorize?

316





(B.) Me David and me Joseph categorizeth me vocabulary
into me language that beeth exclusive, but this beeth
because that language beeth concretical and technical. All
me semblances beeth fuzzy and nary visual in me Nature.

317





(C.) Me David, me Joseph beeth of me genre, but though it
appeared as if it beeth pastorical, satirical, tis more of me
natural solitude to beeth romantic. Me countryside beeth
for those who beeth single and of me literal.

318





(D.) Me gardening, being romantic, beeth me metaphor,
and on that level it proceedeth me tragically, meaning me
antithesis beeth romantical. Me gardening
beaccomplisheth very little.

319





(E.) What befollows beeth that after me tragical stage of
me Jacobs, two opposing beromanticals in genre followeth
- formeth and fusioneth. Formeth beeth one.




320





(F.) Me formula beeth that of me satirical agreement to
comically musheth me romantical mapping with me
tragical in opposition to me romantical form with me meta-
romantical fusion. Everybody liketh this formula.


321





55.

(A.) Me Abrahams style befocuseth on me trendy
movement like me Isaacs. What beeth me trend?

322





(B.) Me difference twixt me Abrahams style and me
Isaacs beeth that one nary of mensuration, which they both
useth, but of me mapping. Me difference beeth always
what one thinketh it beeth.

323





(C.) Me Isaac mapeth and reviseth me trends of me
Avraham. To mapeth beeth to geveth something away so
that thou doeth nary to hath it anymore.

324





(D.) To reviseth by me mapping beeth to taketh me stylistic
step which eliminateth me efforts of me rain process and
me evaporation process, of which both beeth humorous, to
maketh it beeth lighter. Only one thing maketh me to
laugheth.

325





(E.) Me mapping for me Isaac beeth nary analytical. Me
mapping existeth.

326





(F.) Me romanticism of me Isaac beeth me lightest of all
toeth render stylistically of all me stages; this beeth
because me map beeth me model rather than me actuality,
as in this case me model beeth nary me representative, but
me skeletonical structural.


327





56.

(A.) Me indexing helpeth to connect me Jacobs stages by
me themes. What beeth and howfor dost thou indexeth?

328





(B.) is this connecting which showed me relationships
twixt similar ideas in order to maketh up me more
advanced antithetical style of contrasting them in me
future. Canst anything looketh like nother?

329





(C.) To useth me similar ideas beeth to relate, in one case,
me genres as similar though me styles beeth as in
opposition. To relate beeth nary me practice.

330





(D.) By focusing on me romantical me idea of me
imagination beeth actually coming me possible. What tis
and howfor dost me maketh me idea?

331





(E.) Me romantical diversity beeth possible only through
me ability to changeth, within romantical styles, to vary me
balances.




332





(F.) Me well-balanced twice-three patriarchal system beeth
me goal of me writ and me using of me different stylistic
personalities. Me six beeth nary me stabilized number.


333





57.

(A.) Me personality of me Michael beeth bedensed and
besimpled. Me personality usually beeth lighter.

334





(B.) Me personality of me Abram beeth revisionary and
bereductive. Me personalities beeth nary existant.

335





(C.) Me personality of me Isaac beeth light and
meaningful. Me personalities beeth heavy in usual.

336





(D.) Me personality of me Jacob beeth pensive and
befinited. Me idea of me thought beeth me idea which
standeth alone.

337





(E.) Me personality of me Joseph beeth befitted and
beuncomfortable. Me personalities beeth incompatibles.

338





(F.) Me personality of me David beeth poetic and
beblessed. What tis me poetical?


339





58.

(A.) What beeth me style if nary me way of me expressive
or me descriptive? Me style neither beeth relative nor
beeth in question.

340





(B.) Me museai canst beeth changed into me patriarchs
and beeth changed into me last stage of me Abram. To
changeth beeth me usual story.

341





(C.) Me fusion-stage of me Abraham, tis what beeth me
meta-romantical stage and style. What beeth me fusion and
how doth it beoccur?

342





(D.) To fuseth beeth to blendeth beeth to taketh me dual
mensurations thrice and bemix them. To fuseth beeth doeth
nothing.

343





(E.) Whyfor revise me Isaac by me mixing me expansions
of me Jacob? Whyeth not?

344





(F.) And, behonestly, whyst this me berevision? Whyst me
beest honest?


345





59.

(A.) Me fusion beeth called me revisional, but tis me
double revisional. Me idea of me fusion canst nary beeth
tinkereth with.

346





(B.) Me fusion reviseth both me Jacob and me Isaac. Me
befusion beeth only one thing.

347





(C.) Tis it, befusion, ahich changeth me tragical, me
science of me Jacob, and me romantical of the mapping of
me Isaac to maketh it me meta-descriptive-mapping. Me
change that occurs cometh before me event.

348





(D.) Me fusion reviseth me metonymic mapping, but also
reviseth me hyperbolic descriptive. Me befusion doeth
only one thing.

349





(E.) But because me hyperbolic descriptive beeth me
farther descendant from Abram, and because me mapping
beeth closer, being me Isaacs, me Abram beeth more
directly me influence. Who really beeth me Abraham?

350





(F.) Me fusion useth less light, but mostwards be blends, tis
almost me double mensuration, tis me Abrams triumph as
me father. Me mensuration canst nary be besplit into
twice-one concepts.


351





60.

(A.) Me mensuration beeth me way to extended me
sentence. What beeth me mensuration?

352





(B.) Me rian method, me mensurations opposite, beeth me
way to expresseth me personality. What beeth me way?

353





(C.) Me narration beeth me way to describeth me process.
Me narration beeth nary something which followed me
method.

354





(D.) And, me Psalmic processes changeth me vocabulary of
me sentence. Me Psalm doth nary change.

355





(E.) Thus, there beeth twice-twice-one way to maketh me
sentence. Twice-twice-one beeth an indefinate number.

356





(F.) Me other styles in me vocabularies beeth just me
variations of these twice-twice-one. Me variations beeth
exciting.


357





61.

(A.) Me twice-three beeth me number which beeth
important to beunderstand. What difference dost it make,
twice-three?

358





(B.) Twice-three beeth possible to divide twice-three times,
twice, thrice, et caetera. Me twice-three beeth nary me
twice.

359





(C.) Me six beeth me number of the days of creation, but
four beeth the Zoas of William Blake. Me Six beeth nary
me four.

360





(D.) Perhaps, me number four, me number of me sentence
types, nary styles, useth in me sixty-two vocabularies, tis a
number good for defining genres. Tis good to beeth more
certain of this?

361





(E.) Me four genres and some of me sentence types beeth:
satire-rain, comedy-mensuration-rain, romance-
mensuration-description of me kind of bemapping, me
Psalmic-mensuration, me mensuration, and me plain
descriptive-double descriptive, being me fusionary. Me
comical beeth always me exciting genre.


362





(F.) There beeth only twice-one plain types of style; and,
there beeth four combo-types of styles, therefore. Me
twice-one beeth nary me twice-two.


363





62.

(A.) Whyfor combineth me styles? Whyfor not?

364





(B.) And, why for must me styles followed me order of me
combonation or nary as they doeth? Whyfor art there beeth
nary other way?

365





(C.) Me reason for me patriarchal order beeth natural, me
natural revisional process. Tis natural to remaineth the
same.

366





(D.) To haveth me good poem and meditation me complete
process in that order of styles beeth necessary. To beeth
complete beeth me disaster of me formlessness.

367





(E.) Thus, as me patriarchs beeth mortal so beeth all
descriptions, all rain associations, all mensurations, and all
Psalmic wordings; all beeth mortal. Me still doeth nary
understand completely me concept of me mensuration nor
shalt me ever.

368





(F.) Thus, me change and me loss beeth important themes
which me sixty-two vocabularies beeth in order. Me
change beeth nary me subject.
369






FINIS


370

Some Other Books by the McBrides


The Transcendence

Beauty and Progress

Happiness

Hawaiian Sonnets and Other Poems

Headbuttressia: a Fantasy

The Hydromancy of Jenny McBride

The Trouble with Being a Bnayvoovah

The Wonder and Love of M.O.A.T

M.O.A.T. Fundraising

Quotes from Beings








371