Practice case study: Two parts to this response: Firstly, a series of notes showing how the answer was written that brought together the student's research on the topic, and secondly, the response itself. Each part takes 2 pages
Practice case study: Two parts to this response: Firstly, a series of notes showing how the answer was written that brought together the student's research on the topic, and secondly, the response itself. Each part takes 2 pages
Practice case study: Two parts to this response: Firstly, a series of notes showing how the answer was written that brought together the student's research on the topic, and secondly, the response itself. Each part takes 2 pages
Last August ,5 students from the same boarding school were admitted to hospital suffering with pneumonia. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from blood cultures done on these.Further surveillance revealed another 20 students from the school who were suffering from pneumonia. These occurred during a period of widespread influena infections. The authorities decided to close the school for a period and no further cases were reported. !n view of "our recentl" ac#uired $nowledge, interpret and discuss the case from the above information provided b" the health authorities. CASE NOTES (RESPONSE PREP) Pneumonia; infection of the aleoli of the lun!"# $nfectiou" a!ent"% eithe& i&al o& 'acte&ial ina(e the a&ea" "u&&oun(in! the linin! of the lun!" an( aleoli# )lui( on the lun!"; (ifficult* '&eathin!# $nflammato&* &e"+on"e to infection initiate( '* ma"t cell"% mac&o+ha!e" an( (en(&itic cell" cau"e( ,hen T-R" 'in( to ta&!et anti!en" an( a&e actiate(# T&i!!e&" &elea"e of c*to.ine"% to "timulate immune actiit* an( (eal ,ith the infection# C*to.ine" &e"+on"i'le fo& (ialation an( moement of ,hite 'loo( cell" into the infecte( a&ea% the lun!" aleoli# The (ea( cellula& matte& an( ,hite 'loo( cell" in the infecte( "ite fo&m" a +u"/flui( in the aleoli "ac"# Thi" hin(e&" o0*!en a'"o&+tion% accountin! fo& "ho&tne"" of '&eath an( flui( on the lun!"# Cou!hin! &efle0 a" +a&t of 1 "t line of immune "*"tem to e0+el fo&ei!n +a&ticle" )ee& P*&o!en" f&om immune "*"tem% inte&leu.in21 +&oo.e &ai"e( 'o(* tem+e&atu&e to "+ee( immune &e"+on"e an( inhi'it 'acte&ial !&o,th# The"e "tu(ent" hae all come f&om the "ame 'oa&(in! "chool% ,ith 23 &eco&(e( ca"e" of +neumonia an( 3 confi&me( a" 'acte&ial streptococcus pneumonia# Occu&&e( "imultaneou"l* ,ith ,i(e"+&ea( i&al influen4a infection" 5oa&(in! "chool" inole "tu(ent" in clo"e +&o0imit* to one anothe&6 "ha&e( liin! a&ea"% an( u"e of ai& con(itionin!# Stu(ent" inole(6 li.el* to 'e 'et,een 13 an( 23 *ea&" of a!e# -i.el* to hae health*% ,ell2(eelo+e( immune "*"tem"# 7i&al influen4a can lea( to i&al +neumonia th&ou!h "*"tematic infection; moin! ia the 'loo("t&eam f&om the u++e& &e"+i&ato&* t&act an( na"ao2+ha&*n0# Thu"% i&al +neumonia i" "i!nificantl* le"" common in a(ult" than chil(&en a" l*m+hatic &e"+on"e ,ill 'e fa"te& in a(ult" 8&eate& effectiene"" of ,hite 'loo( cell &eco!nition of i&al +&otein" an( natu&al .ille& cell" &eco!nition of infecte( cell" in the o&i!inal "ite of infection "+ee(" &ecoe&* in a(ult" a'ilit* of anti!en +&e"entin! cell" to &eco!ni"e i&al anti!en" an( +&oo.e an a(a+tie &e"+on"e% an( "imila&it* 'et,een influen4a infection" (ealt ,ith +&eiou"l* in a(ult" al"o "+ee( immune &e"+on"e# 8ien the a!e of the 'oa&(in! "tu(ent"% it can 'e "ai( that the* hae health* an( (eelo+e( immune "*"tem"# $t i" mo&e li.el* that the ca"e" of +neumonia that ,e&e not i"olate( (the 20) ,e&e al"o 'acte&ial% a" i&al +neumonia i" uncommon fo& a(ult" an( the 42890438 'acte&ia i" ea"il* cont&acte( an( +atho!enic# Streptococcus pneumonia ma* 'e +a&t of a +e&"on9" natu&al &e"+i&ato&* flo&a 'ut can 'ecome +atho!enic un(e& ce&tain ci&cum"tance"% "uch a" an immuno2com+&omi"e( ho"t% o& a" a "econ(a&* o& co2infection# (Roth'e&!% 2008) (:eunch% 2013) Can 'e t&an"mitte( f&om lun!" of ho"t to othe& ho"t" ia cou!hin!; in(i&ect fomite on (&o+let" e0hale( f&om ho"t# A" thi" i" out'&ea. occu&&e( a 'oa&(in! "chool% 'oth the i&al influen4a an( 'acte&ial +neumonia a&e li.el* to hae 'een "+&ea( in thi" ,a*# The clo"e contact of "tu(ent" account" fo& the concent&ation of ca"e" amon!"t "tu(ent"# Clo"u&e of the "chool aime( at '&ea.in! the !a+ of +e&"on to +e&"on t&an"mi""ion ia in(i&ect fomite# 5* +&eentin! infecte( +e&"on" f&om 'ein! in con"tant contact an( in clo"e( &oom"% the ae&o"ol" of thei& '&eath o& cou!hin! (o not infect fu&the& +eo+le% an( thu" thi" mea"u&e i" effectie# The 'acte&ia +neumonia i" li.el* to hae 'een a "econ(a&* o& co2infection# Althou!h the o&i!inal "ou&ce of the 'acte&ia ma* hae 'een f&om a +e&"on9" no&mal flo&a% a" a "econ(a&* o& co2infection to influen4a% the +atte&n of a +oint2"ou&ce e+i(emic "u!!e"t" that a "in!le +e&"on "+&ea( thi" 'acte&ia to the othe& &e"i(ent" of the 'oa&(in! "chool ("u((en% multi+le ca"e" of "imila& con(ition" ,ith a clea& common +o&tal of ent&*)# Simultaneou" influen4a actiit* in the "chool "u!!e"t" that i&al influen4a a""i"te( the "ettlement of the lun!" of the affecte( in(ii(ual" ,ith +atho!enic streph pneumonia 'acte&ia# Secon(a&* an( l*m+hatic immune &e"+on"e" occu+ie( ,ith i&al infection; le"" aaila'le to (eal ,ith 'acte&ial infection# $nfluen4a i&u"e" lea( to hi!h neu&amini(a"e actiit*6 co&&elate" to 'ette& a(he"ion of 'acte&ial matte& to &e"+i&ato&* cell" in the ai&,a*% inc&ea"in! +atho!enicit* of 'acte&ia# (-utte&% 2010) P&o2a+o+to+ic +&otein" e0+&e""e( '* i&al influen4a" in(uce" lun! +atholo!*% an( the&efo&e the "econ(a&* challen!e '* +neumoniae 'acte&ia in the lun!" +&oo.e" a !&eate& inflammato&* &e"+on"e% (ama!in! the cell" of the lun! an( +&oi(in! the &e;ui"ite nut&ient" fo& 'acte&ial !&o,th# (-utte&% 2010) $t i" mo&e li.el* that 'acte&ial +neumonia ,a" a "econ(a&* infection than a co2infection a" the i&al infection Refe&ence"6 :eunch et al% (2013) Pneunococcal Infections, :e("ca+e Roth'e&! et al, (2008) Complications of Viral Influenza, The Ame&ican <ou&nal of :e(icine# -utte& et al% (2010) Bench-to-bedside review: Bacterial pneumonia with influenza - pathogenesis and clinical implications% C&itical Ca&e 42890438 Medical Microbiology Case Study 2 Last August ,5 students from the same boarding school were admitted to hospital suffering with pneumonia. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from blood cultures done on these. Further surveillance revealed another 20 students from the school who were suffering from pneumonia. These occurred during a period of widespread influena infections. The authorities decided to close the school for a period and no further cases were reported. !n view of "our recentl" ac#uired $nowledge, interpret and discuss the case from the above information provided b" the health authorities. Disease & Pathophysiology !t is stated that 25 students are recorded to have contracted pneumonia while at boarding school. !n pneumonias of microbial origin, the infectious agent invades the tissue of the lung, ad%acent to the alveoli. The organism responsible is most often bacterial, but can also be viral or rarel" fungal & parasitic. Antigens originating from the infectious organism bind to the TL' of dendritic cells, macrophages and mast cells, triggering an immune response. This includes the release of c"to$ines, prompting inflammation through dilation of surrounding blood vessels, enabling the movement of white blood cells and l"mphoc"tes into the alveoli and alveoli sacs. This cellular matter lea$s into the alveolar sacs, and inhibits o("gen upta$e in the lungs, harming the affected person. )ther notable c"to$ines include interleu$in*+ and p"rogens, which cause a fever, to raising bod" temperature, speeding the immune response and thermall" inhibiting bacterial growth. Epidemiology & Transmission The infected students originate from a common boarding school, with a total of 25 individuals affected with pneumonia. As the students were li$el" between +0 and +, "ears of age, the" are li$el" to have well* developed immune s"stems. The isolation of strephtococus pneumonia from the blood of 5 of the affected students suggests that the infectious agent responsible for pneumonia was this organism, as bacteremia occurs in advanced stages of bacterial pneumonia infections. These cases of confirmed bacterial pnuemonia occurred concurrentl" with a widespread viral influena infections, which can also cause pneumonia. Transmission of the pneumonia in either case -bacterial or viral. involves a fomite of water droplets e(pelled from the infected person/s lungs when coughing, sneeing or breathing. These, when inhaled, can establish themselves and cause further infection. 0iven the circumstance of a boarding school1 multiple persons in shared living areas, sleeping, eating and stud"ing in a common area, the transmission of airborne droplets from person to person via fomite seems to be the most li$el" means of transmission. Although all affected students with pneumonia were not confirmed to have bacterial pneumonia, the ade#uate chain of transmission and the nature of viral pneumonia -to be discussed. means that it is ver" probable that all the cases of pneumonia were caused b" a common organism. Organisms implicated and mechanism Although viral influena can lead to viral pneumonia, it is li$el" that bacteria pneumonia was responsible in this case as a secondar" or co*infection. 2iral influena can lead to viral pneumonia in advanced stages of infection, as the viral agent enters the bloodstream from the initial site of infection in the nose or upper throat and infects the lungs -'othberg, 200,.. Therefore, viral pneumonia is relativel" rare in adults or those with well*developed immune s"stems. The greater effectiveness of white blood cell recognition of viral proteins speeds recover" before s"stemic infection, and a well*developed immune s"stem is more able to recognise viral antigens and provo$e an 42890438 adaptive response to the infection, repressing it before it can enter the bloodstream. 0iven the age of the boarding students, the presence of a read" and ade#uate chain of transmission and that another possible causative bacteria has been found, it is unli$el" that viral pneumonia was responsible for these cases of pneumonia. Although there are a variet" of bacteria potentiall" responsible for pneumonia, streptococcus pneumonia is the most common organism responsible - between 30 and ,04 . and was isolated in the serious cases of hospitalised patients. !t e(ists as natural respirator" flora, generall" onl" becoming pathogenic in an immuno*compromised host or as a secondar" or co*infection -5eunch, 20+6.. Therefore, it is li$el" that it acted as an opportunistic pathogen, colonising the lung of a student with influena, who then spread the bacterial infection via formite of aerosol to other students, giving those with influena a secondar" infection of streptococcal pneumonia. Academic material demonstrates that viral influena assists the colonisation of lungs with bacterial pneumonia b" three mechanisms. Firstl", the host/s immune s"stem is occupied with the viral influena, and is less able to resist a secondar" pathogen, aiding the abilit" of the bacteria to colonise the lungs where is is otherwise hard for it to become established. Secondl", viral influena leads to high neuraminidase activit"7 correlating to better adhesion of bacterial matter to respirator" cells in the airwa", which increases the pathogenicit" of bacteria -Lutter, 20+0.. Thirdl", viral influena e(presses pro*apoptopic antigenic proteins that amplif" the immune response to the secondar" infection in the lungs 8 the greater inflammator" response damages the lungs and cellular tissue of the alveoli, providing nutrients to assist in colonisation of bacteria in the lungs -Lutter, 20+0.. Lutter et al notes that viral influenas precede most cases of bacterial pneumonia1 stating that these mechanisms are crucial in allowing streptococcal pneumonia to successfull" colonise the lungs and cause pnuemonia. As the boarding school had an outbrea$ of influena, it is highl" li$el" that strephtococus pneumonia, perhaps from the natural flora of a student, was a secondar" infection that was then spread to other students, and is responsible for the pneumonia at that boarding school. Procedures of treatment and control !t is stated that the treatments provided were hospitalisation -and assumed relevant treatment. and the temporar" closure of the school. 9ospitalisation, perhaps involving treatment with antibiotics, $ills the bacteria involved and assists the bod" in controlling and eventuall" eliminating the lung infection, while managing the fluids on the lung, fever and associated respirator" discomfort. The success of temporar" closure of the school confirms that airborne fomites in aerosol were responsible for the spread of infection7 infected persons, whether s"mptomatic or not, cannot mi( with their peers and transmit the bacteria b" putting these bacteria into the air, to be inhaled b" another health" individual. The case demonstrates a point*source outbrea$1 !t was a sudden case, with multiple students e(hibiting similar s"mptoms, where the removal of a common portal of e(it&entr" b" closing the school and preventing contact with e(pelled fomites prevented further infection. 'eferences7 +. 5eunch et al, -20+6. Pneunococcal Infections, 5edscape 2# Roth'e&! et al, (2008) Complications of Viral Influenza, The Ame&ican <ou&nal of :e(icine# 6. Lutter et al, -20+0. Bench-to-bedside review: Bacterial pneumonia with influenza - pathogenesis and clinical implications, :ritical :are
Raising Mentally Strong Kids: How to Combine the Power of Neuroscience with Love and Logic to Grow Confident, Kind, Responsible, and Resilient Children and Young Adults
Dark Psychology & Manipulation: Discover How To Analyze People and Master Human Behaviour Using Emotional Influence Techniques, Body Language Secrets, Covert NLP, Speed Reading, and Hypnosis.
Summary: It Didn't Start with You: How Inherited Family Trauma Shapes Who We Are and How to End the Cycle By Mark Wolynn: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis