Government of India & Government of The Netherlands
DHV CONSULTANTS &
DELFT HYDRAULICS with HALCROW, TAHAL, CES, ORG & JPS GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROCEDURES FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE NORMS May 2002 May - 2002 TOC Table of Contents Preface 1 1 Piezometer Network 2 1.1 Background 2 2 Need for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan 3 2.1 Implementation of O & M Programme 4 2.2 Need for Periodical Inspection 4 3 Inspections Details 6 3.1 Approachability 6 3.2 Inspection of Logbooks 6 3.3 Inspection of Local Site Conditions 7 3.4 Inspection of Fencing 8 3.5 Inspection of Protective Cover 8 3.6 Validating Geographical Co-ordinates 9 3.7 Inspection of Observation Wells 9 3.8 Inspection of Surface Casing of Piezometers without DWLR 10 3.9 Calibrate Measuring Tapes 10 3.10 Examination of Water Level Hydrographs 12 3.11 Identification of Maintenance Tasks Based on the Inspection 13 4 Follow-up of Field Investigations 17 4.1 Down-hole Geophysical Logging 19 4.2 Pumping of Monitoring Structures 19 4.3 Carrying out Aquifer Performance Tests 21 4.4 Development of Piezometer 22 4.5 Removal of Roots 23 4.6 Hydrofracturing 23 4.7 Deepening of Piezometer 25 5 Maintenance of Digital Water Level Recorders 26 May - 2002 Page 1 Preface The critical components making up a groundwater monitoring network are the Observation Wells, Piezometers, Digital Water Level Recorders (DWLRs), Water Quality Networks, Laboratories and the Data Centre's. Historically, the observation wells have been the singular source for understanding groundwater dynamics. This has been further strengthened by the construction of piezometers, many of which have been equipped with DWLRs. Water level data emerging from the piezometers with DWLRs have started providing new insights on medium and short-term cycles of groundwater fluctuations, rainfall- recharge relationships and groundwater quality changes, and also enabled refinement of groundwater resources computations. The optimum performance of the monitoring network needs to be ensured through well-defined Operation & Maintenance (O&M) practices. This calls for establishment of O&M procedures supported with adequate budgets and trained manpower. Generally, the maintenance of monitoring systems has often been neglected and deferred until the performance declined considerably or the system collapsed. This should not be allowed to happen with the infrastructure created under the Hydrology Project (HP). Hence, there is a need to formulate and implement a well- defined O&M programme. The Consultants to the Hydrology Project have been assisting the participating agencies in the formulation of well defined Operation and Maintenance procedures, with focus on maintenance and upkeep of the water level monitoring network established under the HP, even long after the funding from the World Bank is over. For developing the O&M policy a number of HIS operationalisation - regional level - workshops have been conducted, beginning August 2001, in the different states. Division/District/ Sub-division officers along with the field staff involved with water level/water quality data collection have participated in the workshops. The participants deliberated on the different themes that should be part of preventive maintenance as well as problem specific issues, and made recommendations. The manpower, budgetary requirements and operational procedures were also discussed, which has been reflected in the recommendations. This manual explains the basics of maintenance and how it is to be done. It is an outcome of the discussions in the numerous workshops. It systematically outlines the O&M procedures focusing on the upkeep of the piezometers and presenting them in a number of logical steps. Simple procedures preventing the declining performance of piezometers are discussed. The manual does not advocate a single strategy but recommends a series of procedures. O&M procedures should be guided by local hydrogeological settings, water quality conditions, the design of the structure, the distribution of the network and the socio- economic settings around the monitoring locations. It is expected that the guidelines will help in assessing the O & M procedures, budgetary requirements and staff that would be required for maintenance of the monitoring network. Detailed maintenance of DWLRs and the Data Centres is not discussed in the manual as these will be company-specific, normally to be taken care of by the vendors through an AMC. Active involvement of the Hydrology Data Users Group (HDUG) and the local community has to be envisaged in the O&M programme. Feedback from the HDUGs and frequent interaction with the local community in the neighbourhood of the network stations, especially farmers, youth and school children, and sharing the information generated from the network with the community, would help in devising new approaches in participatory O&M programmes. May - 2002 Page 2 1 Piezometer Network 1.1 Background Historically, groundwater levels have been monitored using privately owned open dug wells tapping the upper unconfined aquifers. These levels reveal the piezometric head/water table elevation of the semi-confined/unconfined aquifers. However, the necessary well-aquifer hydraulic connection has not always been well established. The frequency of monitoring has generally been restricted to a few times in a year corresponding to water levels during pre- monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons. These water levels have been used to construct water table hydrographs representing the troughs and peaks of the water table. In reality, many times these data have been too sparse to construct reliable and credible water level hydrographs. The Hydrology Project has enabled construction of a large number of scientifically designed piezometers tapping unconfined and deeper aquifers. A piezometer is a purpose-built observation well that facilitates measurement of the piezometric head of the selected aquifer. Since the area covered under the project (Central & South India) is largely made up of consolidated formations, the bulk of the piezometers constructed in these formations has been designed as bore-wells and a limited number in unconsolidated formations as tube wells. In order to be effective, these piezometers should always have the necessary hydraulic connection with the targeted aquifers and should be suitably isolated from overlying/underlying aquifers. Only then the water levels monitored in these piezometers will continue to provide a reliable water level elevation, representative of the regional piezometric elevation in its vicinity. Digital Water Level Recorders (DWLRs) are installed in a number of piezometers. Optimally functioning DWLRs can only give undistorted piezometric head at the desired frequency. High frequency water level monitoring using the DWLR has enabled the generation of continuous hydrographs providing data on annual cycles. It also picks up many cycles of shorter duration like seasonal, barometric, daily, and tidal cycles. This monitoring has helped in generating a better understanding of the groundwater system, and of the recharge rainfall- response in different hydrogeological situations. It has also helped in refining the estimation of groundwater resources. Piezometers have become a reliable source for sampling the groundwater from the tapped aquifer for water quality monitoring. May - 2002 Page 3 2 Need for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan The integrated groundwater monitoring networks comprise the newly constructed piezometers and the observation wells of both the state and central agencies. In order to ensure generation of reliable data from the networks, the piezometers and the observation wells have to be systematically maintained. Under-performing observation wells and piezometers would generate erroneous data, that could result in wrong interpretations. This would in the long run result in formulating wrong policies and legislations. Declining performance of piezometers and observation wells is natural with the passage of time. The declining performance needs to be anticipated and preventive maintenance needs to be carried out. The causative factors for declining performances will be largely guided by the local conditions and these have to be well understood, so as to formulate suitable maintenance strategies. Open dug wells are referred to as the most efficient groundwater structures and, hence, in a normal situation, they should be the ideal structure for monitoring the water levels. In the case of observation wells the reliability of the data would decrease considerably when: the observation well goes into disuse and is used for dumping waste declining water levels result in drying up of the well for part of, or throughout the year there is siltation in the well the well collapses there are damages to the platform leading to seepage of surface water and domestic waste the monitoring structure is submerged for part of, or throughout the year there is a number of production wells near the open well overlapping the area of influence Piezometers are simple structures and would require very little for a regular upkeep, also since there are no pumping equipments. Periodically it may require cleaning and/or rehabilitation, removing unwanted materials and improving the flow of the surrounding aquifer to the piezometer. Poor performance can be expected due to: clogging of the fractures or deposition on the bore-hole walls poor or under-development of the piezometer at the time of construction general decline in regional water levels leading to seasonal or complete drying up of piezometers siltation leading to blocking significant portions of the water bearing zones/screens collapse of the piezometer incrustation of the screen growth of roots from the sides of the bore-hole heavy influence of other production wells near the piezometers overlapping the area of influence seepage of surface water due to failure of sanitary seals vandalism dropping of DWLR into the piezometer submergence of the piezometer for part of, or throughout the year May - 2002 Page 4 The O&M procedures should identify the monitoring structures that encounter one or more of the problems listed above. Data emerging from such suspect structures should be identified at the initial stages itself and these structures should be repaired. In cases where the deterioration is beyond repair, the monitoring structures should be abandoned and suitable replacements planned. The O&M strategy should be preventive in nature rather than curative. It has to be recognised that deterioration of monitoring structures is natural with time, hence there is a need to invest in maintenance. Only this can ensure generation of data of reliable quality. In case of piezometers, the aim should to be maintain them in their original drilled/cased depth, ensuring a good hydraulic connection with the groundwater reservoir being monitored. The O&M plan has to be formulated by all the agencies with a clear definition of the procedures, standard maintenance practices, prescribed technical options for different generic problems with clear recognition of responsibilities at the different levels, the budgetary requirements, reporting and evaluation procedures. 2.1 Implementation of O & M Programme An ideal O&M policy should ensure that a series of procedures are in place for monitoring the health of all the monitoring structures. Maintenance of the observation wells would continue to be a tricky issue, as most of them are privately owned. However, it has to be ensured that non-representative observation wells do not continue to generate data. (It was reported in the workshops that a number of observation wells are fully/seasonally abandoned open wells, which sometimes turn into garbage dumps and need immediate replacement). These need to be replaced by reliable open wells or dedicated piezometers. Review of the performance of all the observation wells appears very relevant and all the agencies are advised to carry out a detailed examination of all the observation wells and confirm that the data emanating from them are reliable. Declining performance of a certain number of piezometers constructed under the Hydrology Project has also been reported. The problems that result in the poor performance need to be understood, the solutions for reviving them identified and repairs carried out so as to bring them back to optimally performing levels. 2.2 Need for Periodical Inspection The health of the monitoring network (for water level and water quality monitoring) needs to be periodically evaluated by competent authorities in the different districts/divisions/regions, so as to reassure that the data generated are reliable and that the monitoring practices are in agreement with the prescribed methodology. The officers responsible for data collection have the singular responsibility of picking up the first indicator that reflects a less than optimal performance of the structure. Keen observations followed by systematic scrutiny of the data during every observation are the key to picking up declining performances. The officers responsible for data collection have to allocate adequate time at all observation sites for evaluating the structures and the data. It has to be always kept in mind that data emerging from a poorly performing monitoring structure can lead to wrong interpretations. Any structure whose performance is considered suspect by the field-data collector has to be reported to the concerned officer recommending follow-up investigations. May - 2002 Page 5 As a procedure, detailed inspection has to be carried out annually or whenever earlier as requested by the field officer responsible for data collection. The inspection should be carried out by the In-charge accompanied by the officers responsible for data collection. These inspections need to be carried out preferably two months prior to the onset of the monsoon, so that remedial actions can be taken up before the monsoon. As part of the inspection the supervisor should witness field measurements of water levels, water quality sampling and DWLR data transfer. The civil structures have to be examined, the instruments inspected and the neighbourhood of the monitoring structures observed. Brief chats with the people in the neighbourhood should prove beneficial in understanding issues that are not seen or otherwise visualised during the inspection. The inspection should ensure that the monitoring structure: is providing reliable data identifies the potential threats that could affect the generation of reliable data identifies solutions for ensuring continuous generation of data makes plans for ensuring the implementation of periodic maintenance procedures verifies the skills of the field officer in-charge of data collection inspects the data collection formats and log books and cross-checks them in the field makes an estimate of the maintenance budget checks the performance and the discipline of the observation staff and staff motivation identifies any observation procedure errors calibrates the measuring tape The integration of the individual networks of the State and Central Agencies has to be ensured through regular meetings between the agencies, for an exchange of notes after each inspection. A joint inspection is also useful at times, but is not always a necessity. May - 2002 Page 6 3 Inspections Details The inspection should verify whether the construction of the piezometer has been matching the specifications and whether all the relevant information regarding the piezometer construction and the local conditions is recorded accurately. Further, it should look at the approachability of the monitoring site, the time taken for reaching the site, the neighbourhood of the site, the status of the fence and of the protection cover and then examine the monitoring structure itself. The inspection team should also address issues related to facilities provided to the monitoring team, including timely availability of transport, fuel allocation, the status of monitoring instruments, the availability of spares and other relevant issues. 3.1 Approachability The water level monitoring network established under the Hydrology Project has a large area coverage. The network represents the different hydrogeological units and aquifer systems. It is likely that a limited number of these monitoring structures are not easily approachable (or probably not at all) throughout the year. It has to be ensured that the normal routes taken for reaching the monitoring structures are inspected and bottlenecks, if any, clearly identified, and that alternative routes, if any, have also been identified and inspected. During the inspection of the roads not only the mobility of jeeps but also of heavy trucks, that would carry the water quality sampling pumps/compressor/pumping test units/drilling rig/ hydrofracturing units, has to be kept in mind. In terrain where approachability is difficult during certain seasons, the feasibility of using local observers (with the required technical skills) to monitor the data for preventing discontinuity in data generation has to be examined. The advisability of installing DWLRs for monitoring water levels in such piezometers also has to be examined. A route map should be prepared for all observation sites giving the approach road from the nearest town/highway or prominent feature. The map should give the distances, types of roads, major bottlenecks and alternative routes, if any. The details of permanent identification marks and the names of local contact persons with their address should also be part of the map. The maps with the details of the location should be part of the Logbook. 3.2 Inspection of Logbooks It is expected that for every monitoring site a log-book, also referred to as the well register, is maintained giving location details in the form of a map and text. These details would include geographical co-ordinates, height of Measuring Point (MP), structure design, construction details, original depth, lithology, aquifer depth, discharge, and water quality details. Information on the monitoring details including initiation date, monitoring frequency, details of DWLR and cable length should be part of the logbook as well. The logbook should be carried to the site every time a water level monitoring or water quality sampling is carried out. The inspection team should examine data collection formats, and log books and cross check them in the field, essentially for assessing the performance of the field officer responsible for data collection, and assessing the training requirements and the performance of the field instruments. May - 2002 Page 7 The purpose of the logbook is to keep a clear record of checks and details of maintenance undertaken when the site is visited. This includes routine monitoring and inspection by supervising officers. The logbook is an extremely important link in the data quality audit chain. The design of the logbook will depend upon the type of the monitoring well, design, type of instruments installed and the frequency of monitoring. 3.3 Inspection of Local Site Conditions The observation wells forming part of the water level and water quality monitoring network are largely private or community owned open dug wells. In the case of piezometers these are all located on the premises of government institutions such as schools, colleges, local government offices, electric sub-stations, health centres, inspection bungalows, police stations, village centres or other government lands. It has been noticed that in many cases local agencies or interested volunteers have been of assistance in protecting the piezometers from vandalism as well as helped maintain the surroundings by cutting the grasses/weeds/branches etc. In some situations, the local institutions have not been of much assistance in giving protection or maintenance. The reason for the indifference can be due to lack of awareness on the utility of the water level monitoring structures and its relevance in their life. This situation needs to be altered and awareness should be created regarding the benefits of reliable data. Figure 3.1: Carry out regular inspection of all piezometers and observation wells by a team headed by the Data Centre In-charge, to ensure that data generated are reliable The annual inspection team have to sensitise the local people regarding the utility of the piezometers and the need for proper maintenance. It would always be useful if the design of the structure and the instruments used are explained along with sample sets of different data. This would generate interest in the local authorities and communities to help, if not in maintenance, at least in preventing vandalism. The neighbourhood of the piezometer, both inside and outside the fence, has to be examined. Water logging conditions, sewage dumps, pumping wells etc have to be identified and their influence on the data generated examined. The corruption of the data, if any, because of the influences in the neighbourhood should be examined and remedial actions suggested. This would refer to, for instance, the growth of weeds and grass inside the enclosure and the branches of trees outside hindering movement and maintenance work. Provisions have to be made for cutting weeds and grass once every quarter and to prune the branches every year. The cost of cleaning the neighbourhood of the piezometer should be worked out and the person who can execute the job locally should be identified. May - 2002 Page 8 3.4 Inspection of Fencing In some states, piezometers with DWLR have been enclosed with barbed wire fencing. The status of the fence and the angle irons posts anchoring them need to be inspected. During the inspection, it has to be ensured that the prevailing fencing is not only good currently but will also not deteriorate before the next inspection. Figure 3.2: Check barbed wire fence, angle irons, gate and locks The portion where the barbed wire is loose has to be identified. The maintenance requirement for different tasks, including giving tension to barbed wire or replacement wherever required, and painting or replacement of angle iron posts have to be identified. Barbed wire fencing would likely need to be replaced more frequently in coastal areas/areas with polluted air as compared to other areas Similarly, the angle iron posts, which are rusted, damaged and need replacement should be identified. 3.5 Inspection of Protective Cover The piezometers equipped with a DWLR have a protective cover. In many states piezometers without a DWLR do not have any protective cover. The design of the protective cover varies from agency to agency. It is mounted on a brick masonry/concrete (some times pre-fabricated) platform anchored through bolts and nuts. Figure 3.3: Identify the components of the protective cover, including the box, hinges, thermocol insulation, bolts, nuts and locks that need maintenance or replacement During the inspection it has to be ensured that the protective cover is in good condition, the top cover is not rusted, and the locked doors fully protect the instruments placed inside. It has also to be ensured that rainwater does not stagnate on the top of the cover or seeps through the base of the platform. The hinges should be in good condition. The Thermocol insulation inside the box should be inspected and replacements suggested wherever May - 2002 Page 9 required. The nuts and bolts that anchor the protection box with the platform need to be oiled and greased regularly. The bolts will have to be opened whenever maintenance works have to be carried out on the piezometer. Provision has to be made for painting the protective cover and the board every two years in coastal areas/ areas with heavy air pollution and in other areas every 3 years. The masonry platform also has to be inspected for any development of cracks. The maintenance budget should include provisions for repair of the platform every time the protective cover is removed. 3.6 Validating Geographical Co-ordinates The geographical co-ordinates corresponding to the location of the piezometer need to be validated by the Data Centre Manager. The validations should be carried out with the help of the toposheet (1:50,000 scale) brought to the site. Using the brunton compass, locate the piezometer site accurately on the toposheet. Figure 3.4: Verify the accuracy of the geographical co-ordinates assigned for the piezometer using brunton compass and toposheet The Lat. - Long. values should be read from the toposheet and the values verified. Validated geographical co-ordinates should only be used for generating different types of maps and cross sections. 3.7 Inspection of Observation Wells The observation wells, which have been the main source of data on water levels and water quality for the last three decades, need to be inspected. Declining water levels, drilling of bore-wells/ tube wells as reliable drinking water source and the easy availability of power have resulted in discontinued maintenance of the observation wells. In the absence of alternative sources, these observation wells continued to be used as monitoring wells by the groundwater agencies. Figure 3.5: Spend time at observation well site, ensure that data generated are useful, reliable and representative 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 May - 2002 Page 10 Inspection of the network should focus on the relevance of some of the observation wells. The inspection should clearly indicate that the observation well continues to represent the regional groundwater system that is being monitored and continues to generate reliable data. It has also to be ascertained that the groundwater does not get contaminated with the surface run off, sewage/ domestic waste and can continue to be used for water quality monitoring. The well platform (in the case of domestic wells) and the stone/cement covering that prevents collapsible material from falling into the well also have to be examined. 3.8 Inspection of Surface Casing of Piezometers without DWLR The piezometers that have not been fitted with a DWLR in many cases do not have a protective box. The top-casing pipe of the piezometer has in many cases a protective-casing pipe of galvanised iron along with a cap. The protective cover is usually painted. It is exposed to the vagaries of the weather and vandalism. The status of the protective cover has to be inspected. Figure 3.6: Inspect Piezometers without a DWLR. Check protective casing, cap and masonary platform, and identify maintenance requirements The necessity of painting and repairs if any has to be recorded. It has to be closely examined whether the cap is able to cover the piezometer properly. The inspection team should recommend on the frequency of painting required. In case the surface casing pipe is of PVC and is not protected with a GI casing pipe, it has to be ensured that the PVC pipe does not provide scope for vandalism. The necessity of proper fencing of the piezometer sites has to be examined. The status of the platform also has to be examined. 3.9 Calibrate Measuring Tapes The first indicator of the health of the piezometer/observation well is the water level. Manual measurements of the depth to water levels should be carried out during the inspection. The manual water level measurements should be recorded and compared with the DWLR water levels wherever available or with the previous readings in the piezometers without a DWLR. The inspection team should discuss with the officer in-charge of regular monitoring the type of method to be used for manual water level measurement and calibration of the tape. Manual measurements, are considered very simple and basic, and usually taken for granted. The errors that creep in are ignored or arbitrarily corrected. The different methods used for water level monitoring are discussed on the following pages: May - 2002 Page 11 The most popular method for measuring the water levels is to use a metallic tape. A stone or bob is tied at the lower end. The tape is lowered into the piezometer. When the sound of the bob hitting the water level is heard the corresponding measurement is noted and recorded as water level Below Measuring Point (BMP). Where the water levels are deeper than the tape length additional pieces of some known length are tied to it. The measurement of water levels with a metallic tape should not be considered reliable as it has in-built deficiencies which change from person to person and tape to tape. So it should be replaced by other standard techniques. Measurement of water levels using electrical dip tapes is another practised method. The dip tape is battery operated and touching the water the indicator gives a beep sound/glowing light or both. Run down batteries, poor contacts and cuts in the tape may give erroneous values. This method is more reliable but it has to be ensured that the graduations marked on the tape are correct. It is recommended to purchase electrical tapes from companies with proven accuracy and reliability. The graduations need to be validated using more than one tape. Another popular method is the wetted tape (hold & cut) method. In this method a graduated steel tape is used for measuring the depth to water levels. A weight is attached to the lower end of the tape. The lower part of the tape is coated with chalk. The steel tape is lowered until part of chalked portion of the tape is below water. The reading from the MP is noted. The tape is then pulled up and the wetted chalk portion read. This reading is then subtracted from the measurement at the MP, which is the actual water level depth. This is a very reliable method for water level measurement. May - 2002 Page 12 Manual measurement of water levels has to be taken up only by using a reliable tape. In the piezometers fixed with a DWLR this has to be carried out once every month before down- loading the data. Cross verification of the measurement of water levels more than once and adopting more than one method should be made a standard practise, every time water level measurements are carried out. 3.10 Examination of Water Level Hydrographs The field officers responsible for water level monitoring should be concerned about more than just measuring water levels. They should be aware of the details of the aquifer system being monitored and the formations penetrated. The inspection team should reassure itself of the optimum performance of the piezometers in the course of the inspection. Examination of the water level hydrographs of the concerned piezometer along with the well section and design at the site itself should be part of the inspection. The response of the water levels to recharge and discharge effects in the form of annual and seasonal cycles has to be verified and, wherever required, compared with neighbouring wells which tap the same aquifer. Less than desired responses to different situations have to be taken up as cases for detailed field investigations. Figure 3.7: Examine the response of water levels to recharge and draft. Have a good understanding of the aquifer being monitored and the piezometer design. Identify piezometers showing less than optium response for further investigations In such situations, it is likely, that the water level in the piezometer is not fluctuating simultaneously with the piezometric head of the tapped layer, due to lack of response or time lag. The piezometer could then be failing to provide the true information of the aquifer being monitored. Water level data emerging from such piezometers cannot be considered as reliable. Such piezometers should be subjected to detailed investigations for identifying the nature of the problem in the piezometer. May - 2002 Page 13 3.11 Identification of Maintenance Tasks Based on the Inspection Based on the findings from the inspection, the team should be able to recognise the physical status of the piezometer, as well as what is happening down the hole in the piezometer. When it becomes difficult to recognise the sub-surface behaviour based on the available evidence, additional tests may have to be conducted to find out whether the piezometer is operating efficiently or maintenance has be carried out. The inspection team should be able to build a mental picture on the situation down-hole by: measuring the depth of the piezometer measuring the water levels recording the obstructions met with while measuring the depth of the piezometer examining mirror observations reflecting light down the piezometer examining water level hydrographs The field inspection team, basing itself on these checks, should be able to infer whether the monitoring structure can generate accurate data. The results of the check should be used to pick up indicators of deterioration likely to set in. Then the inspection team should be able to give expert advice on the different standard maintenance and preventive maintenance tasks to be carried out. In the case of non-representative monitoring structures, decisions have to be taken on the remedial actions or alternative options recommended. The inspection team has the professional responsibility of ensuring continued efficiency of the different structures that are part of the network. The inspection team should report the observations in the prescribed inspection report. A sample format of the inspection report is given in Table 1, which may be customised according to requirement. The inspection report on individual observation wells and piezometers should be sent to the concerned Data Processing Centre In-charge for information and necessary follow-up action. The inspection findings should form the guidelines for additional field tests to be carried out and maintenance activities initiated. Maintenance work should be carried out at the appropriate, to ensure systematic generation of authentic groundwater data. May - 2002 Page 14 Table 1: Annual Operation and Maintenance Inspection Report Date: District: .. Agency: ..... Mandal/Block: . Village: ... Longitude: Latitude: ... R.L.: ... M.P.: Well No.: ... Well Type: . Total Depth: . Aquifer tapped: DWLR Details, Make. S. No.: . Capacity Range: ..... Installation details: . Inspection team members: . Parameter Query Response Recommended Action Approachable throughout the year/seasonal Areas of poor approachability Periods of poor approachability Alternative routes, if any Period for which data generation will be effected?? Scope for identifying a local observer Approachability Solution for ensuring continuous data generation Status of the neighbourhood of the piezometer Does anything in the neighbourhood affect data generation Details of influencing conditions Distance of the influencing zone from the piezometer site Will the data generated be influenced seasonally or throughout the year Has the influencing zone come up after the establishment of the piezometer Is there a possibility of data corruption Neighbourhood of observation site Does the data need any correction Status of the Name Board Does the name board need any repair. Does any detail mentioned on the board need correction or addition May - 2002 Page 15 Is the well currently used Is the water reported to be potable Is the well reported to go dry Is there any physical damage to the well Does the monitoring well represent a regional aquifer system Status of Observation Well Does the well platform protect it from entry of surface seepage Is the fencing completely protecting the piezometer from vandalism Does the fencing need any main- tenance What length of fencing needs tightening What length of fencing needs replacement Does the angle post need any maintenance When was the angle post painted last time Status of the Barbed Wire fencing around the piezometer How many angle posts need replacement Is there grass and weeds around the piezometer Status of the area besides the piezometer Are there any branches of trees covering the piezometer which need to be removed Is the protective cover anchored with the cement plat-form Does the protective cover show any rusting Does the protective cover need painting Are the doors of the protective cover completely protecting the instruments inside Does the protective cover need repairs or replacement Status of the protective cover of the piezometer Do the locks need replacement Has the masonry platform developed major cracks Does the masonry platform allow seepage of surface water Status of the masonry platform around the piezometer Does the masonry platform need repairs or replacement Is the casing pipe protected and is the cover attached Status of casing pipe exposed to outside Does the casing pipe require painting or other maintenance May - 2002 Page 16 Frequency of manual water level measurements Water Level measurements Frequency of DWLR measurement Does the water level hydrograph clearly bring out annual/seasonal/ diurnal cycles Is there a reason to believe that the water level hydrograph is not responding optimally Does the depth of the piezometer show any reduction Depth of the piezometer Does the diameter of the piezo- meter show any reduction Observations of the team: Recommended follow up work if any May - 2002 Page 17 4 Follow-up of Field Investigations The field investigation report should clearly mention the number of observation wells that need replacement or repair. The number of piezometers that need additional investigations have to be identified. The report should also suggest the type of follow-up studies to be taken up. Field Observation Inference Follow up Technical Task Remarks Geophysical bore-hole logging Diameter Caving zone Corroded casing/screen Depth of the piezo- meter shows reduction Siltation due to caving from weaker zones or break in the casing/screens Flushing - Development Restore the original depth Cleaning through pumping Clogging of fractures/screens Development Remove clogging Siltation Flushing - Development Restore the original depth Steep decline in water levels Piezometer deepening or replacement Water columns beyond measuring range of DWLR Replace DWLR or change the transducer depth Optimal measuring range Non-responsive water levels Reduced Hydraulic connection with the aquifer Hydro-fracture Improved hydraulic connection Growth of other obstructions For growth of roots in the bore- wells, design appropriate tools to clean the piezometer walls of the roots Difficulty in lowering the measuring tape Other obstructions Flushing Restore the original piezometer design May - 2002 Page 18 Operation and Maintenance Estimates Well No. Village Item No. Item Qty. Rate (in Rs.) Unit Amount (in Rs.) 1 Cutting of branches Job/year 2 Repair approach (wherever required) Job/year 3 Clearance of grass, weeds and branches (every six months) Job/year 4 Giving tension to barbed wire fencing Job/year 5 Replacing barbed wire fencing Job/year 6 Replacing broken angle posts Lump Sum (LS) Job/year 7 Providing U nails and barbed wire etc. (LS) 6 Kgs. 8 Painting the protective cover (every 2 years) Job/year 9 Replacing the protective cover (wherever required) Job 10 Repairing the masonry platform (wherever required) Job 11 Replacement of pad-locks (every year) Unit 12 Painting the outer casing pipe (wherever required) Job/year 13 Strengthening the casing pipe (wherever required) Unit 14 Sounding the piezometer (every year) Job/year 15 Geophysical down hole logging (wherever required) Job 16 Development through pumping (every three years) Job 17 Pumping tests (every 5 years) Job 18 Cleaning of piezometer using cutting tool (wherever required) Job 19 Cleaning the piezometer using compressor (every 5 years) Job 20 Hydro-fracturing (wherever required) Job 21 Deepening the piezometer (wherever required) Unit Total Estimate towards Operation & Maintenance Systematic planning for O&M will call for preparing the O&M budget with adequate allocation of funds for the different components. Listing of the different activities under O&M and repairing an estimate is a pre- requisite May - 2002 Page 19 4.1 Down-hole Geophysical Logging Down-hole geophysical logging should be carried out on piezometers that are suspected of siltation, deviations, incrustations and bacterial growth that need confirmation. Logging could also be used to examine the well design and check for breakage in the casing pipes or screens. The borehole logging tools can be chosen from the following: Type of Logging Information Obtained Calliper Diameter of the borehole, permeable zones and type of clay, casing features, casing leaks, screen position and build up, if any Spontaneous Potential Lithology, permeable zone, formation water quality Resistivity Lithology, permeable zone, layer resistivity, thickness, formation water quality Natural gamma Lithology, clay zone, water production zone, layer thickness Temperature Permeable zone, casing leaks, fluid flow and water level Conductivity Casing leaks, permeable zones, formation water quality and water level Interpret the logging results carefully for detecting changes in the piezometer diameter, zones that probably show caving, build up in the piezometer due to siltation, position of the screens, break in casing or screen joints or leakage in casing joints. The results of the logging should be the basis for deciding the follow-up activities for revitalising poorly performing piezometers. 4.2 Pumping of Monitoring Structures The simplest method of sustaining the performance of observation wells/piezometers is through pumping. In this method, the monitoring structure should be pumped at a discharge rate in excess of the potential discharge. During the pumping the effort should be to over- May - 2002 Page 20 pump the monitoring structure. Pumping would remove the storage water/ replace stagnant water as well as help in limited removal of fines in the case of piezometers. In privately owned dug wells used for domestic purpose it might not always be possible to carry out the pumping. However, this should not be a problem with the agricultural wells used for monitoring. In the case of piezometers pumping may not always help in fully cleaning of the piezometer. This has to be followed up by other steps such as using compressors/ drilling rig, jetting and in limited cases even hydrofracturing. Piezometers throwing up a big amount of fine materials during pumping run the risk of getting spoiled because of sand locking in the pump. Cleaning of piezometers through pumping using submersible pumps needs to be carried out as a regular maintenance procedure. The frequency of pumping will vary from piezometer to piezometer depending upon its performance. Regular checking of the specific capacity will indicate the need for cleaning through pumping. Declining of the specific capacity should be considered as an indication for carrying out the pumping. Every piezometer has to be pumped once every three years as part of development. In many cases the piezometers will come up for pumping as part of water quality sampling. However, this should not be considered as a cleaning technique as the water quality-sampling pump is of low discharge. Cleaning through pumping should be considered as an independent process. May - 2002 Page 21 The procedure to be adopted is to pump the piezometer using a suitable submersible pump. The pump capacity, discharge and depth of lowering should be guided by the yields obtained during drilling/development of the piezometer. Preferably, the pump should be placed above the screen in the case of unconsolidated rocks or against the deepest water-yielding zone in the case of consolidated rocks. The procedure should involve pumping of the piezometer in multiple spells. Water levels and discharge have to be monitored during the tests. Initially, the piezometer should be pumped till the water level drops close to the suction limits. The initial water is likely to be muddy with some fines. After the pumping is stopped the piezometer should be allowed to recover. In many situations it is likely that the pumping discharge and water level will start rising compared to initial levels due to the process of development. This should be followed by another spell of pumping and recovery. The process of pumping and recovery should be continued until the pumped water is clear with no fines, and till the water level rise is stabilised. 4.3 Carrying out Aquifer Performance Tests After cleaning and development through pumping it would be advisable to carry out systematic aquifer performance test for estimating the aquifer parameters. The change in the characteristics of the groundwater reservoir and the aquifer parameters over time, need to be understood. This would be beneficial in improving the computation of groundwater resources. Step-draw-down test and constant discharge tests can be carried out on the piezometer. 4.3.1 Step-draw-down Test The step-draw-down test should be performed on piezometers constructed in the un- consolidated formations, primarily to understand the efficiency of the piezometer. An efficient piezometer with minimum well loss would reflect a good hydraulic connection between the aquifer and the piezometer, thereby indicating that the piezometer is reflecting the regional aquifer system very well. May - 2002 Page 22 In the step-draw-down test the piezometer should be pumped in increasing levels (steps) of pumping discharge. For each step water levels have to be monitored systematically until the water level reaches a steady (or near-steady) state. Every step has to be sustained for a period of 60 -100 minutes or until the drawdown in the well ceases to increase any further. The analysis of the discharge in comparison to the draw-down data will permit estimation of aquifer and well loss. This is the base on which a good hydraulic connection of the piezometer with the regional aquifer can be inferred. 4.3.2 Constant Discharge Test A pumping test with a constant discharge needs to be carried out for estimating the aquifer parameters of the tapped aquifer. The test involves pumping the piezometer at a constant discharge rate. The water level changes need to be monitored systematically in the piezometer as well as in any well in the neighbourhood tapping the same aquifer. An analysis of time-distance-draw-down data provides estimates of the aquifer parameters. The pumping tests are not an essential method in the process of development. However, they help in understanding the aquifer system being monitored as well as in recording any changes in aquifer characteristics over time. 4.4 Development of Piezometer Declining performance of the piezometers will be the result of accumulation of fines in the fractures, mineral scale, slime bacteria, silt or sand build-up, changes in the aquifer or the geological area around the piezometer. With the right equipment and techniques, these can easily be removed from the piezometer. Other problems, such as large physical obstructions, extensive damage to the well screen, or changes in the aquifer due to natural events may not be so easily resolved. Piezometer development should be undertaken for removing unwanted materials and improving the flow of the surrounding aquifer to the piezometer. Development should physically remove silt, clay, fine sand, scale, and befouling and correct any deficiencies during construction. This can be accomplished through jetting, surging and/or airlifting. Development will clear unwanted materials from the piezometer and its surroundings, and serve to integrate the piezometer into its environment. No matter how carefully a piezometer has been designed and constructed, over a period of time development is essential to ensure its efficiency and water quality. Development to be carried out on piezometers drilled in consolidated and unconsolidated formations must be different. In the latter case, development of the piezometer would require movement of a drilling rig to the piezometer site. This needs some preparatory work including site preparation, removal of fence, clearing of bushes and branches of trees, removal of DWLR and protective works. The drilling rig has to be positioned carefully to prevent damage to casing and well assembly. Details of the piezometer including type and combination of casing used, the total depth of casing and depth of water bearing zones should be made available to the development unit. May - 2002 Page 23 In tube well designs jetting is the most effective way to clean the well screen and rehabilitate the surrounding aquifer. Jetting involves shooting jets of water through the screen and into the formation while simultaneously pumping the dislodged materials out of the well. The water column should be agitated effectively after the jetting through spells of airlifting. Chemical solutions can also be used for clearing the drilling mud clays, bentonite mud, encrustations, bacterial growth etc. Fresh water mixed with sodium tripolyphosphate should be circulated through the screen. The well should be allowed to set until the polyphosphate can effectively work on the mud cake/ clay masses and desegregate them. Simply poured into a piezometer, the chemicals will not be effective; they need to be followed by physical cleaning. Chemicals that are hazardous and also change the quality of the water should never be used. Before using chemicals, a water quality analysis has to be carried out and any major changes in water quality subsequent to chemical treatment should be clearly recorded. Such piezometers should not be used for drawing major inferences on groundwater quality characteristics. 4.5 Removal of Roots Special cutting tools have to be fabricated for cleaning the piezometers where growth of roots is seen. While designing the cutting tool, piezometer details such as its diameter, the lithology of the formation and the nature of the water bearing formation have to be kept in mind. The drilling rig should be properly positioned keeping in mind the deviations in the piezometer. The cutting tool has to be lowered below the surface casing after which the walls are cleaned with a rotary movement. The cleaning should be stopped 1 metre from the sounded depth. The cutting tool should be pulled out and replaced by the button bit, and cleaned to the bottom. Airlifts should also be carried out with a compressor. Occasionally the cutting and air-lifting should be stopped and the piezometer allowed to recuperate before repeating the process. Airlifting has to be carried out for longer periods against the water bearing zones. 4.6 Hydrofracturing Hydrofracturing should be considered as a technical option only for reviving piezometers that show clogging of fractures or those piezometers that show limited hydraulic connection with the aquifer that is being monitored. Hydrofracturing can be carried out in consolidated rocks especially in those piezometers where complete development cannot be achieved. Based on the logging data the aquifer should be isolated using packers and hydrofracturing should be carried out. Geophysical down-hole logging is a pre-requisite before hydro- fracturing, for isolating the aquifer being monitored. In hydro-fracturing pressurised water is May - 2002 Page 24 injected to clear the fines from the fractures. Care has to be taken to see that new fissures are not created in the process of hydrofracturing. The process involves injection of water into the fracture zone and the fines are washed out. Specialised infrastructure is required for carrying out hydrofracturing and is available with the agencies involved with groundwater development for rural water supply. Care has to be taken to see that the water injected matches with the quality of water in the piezometer. The steps involved in hydrofracturing are: Study the lithological log of the piezometer. Identify the aquifer position. Carry out geophysical down-hole logging and decide on the aquifer where water is to be injected. Lower a dummy tool to check the verticality and diameter of the piezometer to ensure that the piezometer has not collapsed Carry out a discharge test using a submersible pump for finding the pre-fracture yield test Fill the piezometer with potable water so as to remove the air from the piezometer and isolate the fracture zone using the packer. The packer should be inflated with the hydraulic pump. Inject water into the fracture using a high-pressure water pump. The injected water will start working into the fracture. Continue the propagation for 5-10 minutes. Repeat the injection for shorter spells. Carry out post fracturing yield tests. Repeat the logging for comparing the pre- and post- fracturing changes in the formation. May - 2002 Page 25 4.7 Deepening of Piezometer Deepening of the piezometers in consolidated formations can be taken up in select cases where the piezometers show partial penetration, seasonal drying up or large declining water levels. The deepening should be undertaken after ensuring that the tapped aquifer is extending deeper. Geophysical resistivity surveys should be carried out prior to deepening. Before deepening, the deviation of the piezometers has to be examined. Piezometers with large deviations should not be considered for deepening. The diameter of the bit used should be considerably less than the smallest diameter of the piezometer. Deepening of piezometers will be risky if the targeted aquifer is not clearly demarcated. During deepening, there is a potential danger for the piezometer to collapse. May - 2002 Page 26 5 Maintenance of Digital Water Level Recorders Maintenance of DWLRs installed on the piezometers will be a major issue coming up in the next few years. DWLRs are under warrantee for the first year and subsequently are covered under an AMC. Poor functioning/failure of DWLRs in the different agencies is not uncommon. The different makes and different models have their own specific problems. Combined with operating errors of the field staff, the performance of DWLRs has been less than satisfactory. The O&M programme for the DWLR has to be systematically planned. Efforts should be on to identify poorly performing DWLRs and bring these to the notice of the vendor for suitable action. Since the DWLRs are under AMC, contractual obligations would require that only the vendor is allowed to attend to any repairs. Experience shows that since vendors are not very prompt in attending to the problems it would be beneficial if the field staff have the requisite training in identifying potential problems and forewarn the vendor of potential problems. The optimum performance of the DWLR should be verified in the field by validating the water level recorded by the instrument with manual measurements. It has to be ensured that a calibrated tape is used for manual measurements. The major problems in DWLRs functioning have been related to depletion of batteries, sensors not responding to commands, water ingress, excessive power consumption, poor contact of the communication cable between data logger and the Data Retrieval System (palmtop computer/hand held terminal), limitations of the software and its user interface. As part of the O&M strategy, the agencies will have to ensure adequate training by the vendor to the field staff. Regular contacts have to be established with the vendors so as to ensure that different problems reported from different locations are attended to immediately. It has to be ensured that the vendor has an adequate inventory of essential spares. Regular review meetings have to be carried out with the vendor and also the manufacturer for evaluating the performance of DWLRs, identifying critical areas requiring attention and for anticipating potential problems.