Lecture 1: Open and closed loop systems, Laplace Transforms,

impulse responses, pole locations

Venkata Sonti

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore, India, 560012
This draft: March 12, 2008
Keywords :
1 Open and closed loop systems
An open loop dynamical system put together for an application, while it responds to forces and
initial conditions may not satisfy conditions required in that application because of several reasons:
a full model is never available, there are uncertainties in the system, the response is sensitive to
certain parameters and their variations, the design requirement for response may interfere with
the functionality of the system, etc. General requirements on a system include: The system has to
be stable, adequately damped, capable of rejecting disturbance and quick to respond, less sensitive
to parametric variations. While open loop systems may fail to satisfy the above requirements,
feedback systems provide a very good solution.
For e.g., an open loop robot hand, modelled as a double pendulum, even with motors at every
joint and elbow may not perform according to the specs because: 1) The model is inadequate
(rigid body model vs exible body model). There may be joint uncertainties. 2) Model may be
adequate but system values EI, are uncertain. 3) The system values are known with reasonable
accuracies but day to day variations exist. When you assemble, the system behaves one way,
when your friend assembles, it behaves another way. 4) Due to the above reasons system may
actually be unstable. 5) Open loop systems cannot handle disturbances. 6) And the system may
be uncontrollable after all the design and assembly due to the above reasons. This necessitates a
method of including control system design during the system design stage, iteratively. The above
issues are largely corrected by using closed loop systems.
Closed loop systems can be made stable even when the open loop system is unstable, articial
electronic damping can be built into the system, closed loop systems are relatively less sensitive
to disturbances, and also can be made insensitive to parametric variations. In order to achieve
the requirements above, in addition to the physical system (which for us are usually mechanical
systems) one needs electronic systems which can eectively modify (improve) the response. We
will see soon, in the next lecture that the system poles determine the system response. This
additional system eectively modies the total pole locations of the combined physical and the
electronic system. In order to achieve this, an adequate continuous corrective action is built into
the system. Important response information is continuously measured and fed back for comparison

1
with the target reference value. This in turn generates a force related to the dierence between
the two values. This force is applied to the electronic and physical system continuously. The
system thus is now called a closed loop or a feed-back control system. The open loop and the
closed loop system are shown in gures 1 and 2, respectively.
Figure 1 shows an open loop system. An apriori computed force is applied to the system which
is expected to respond based on the specs. If the system fails to respond correctly (because your
estimates were o) or an unanticipated disturbance acted on it, then there is no way to correct
the course. On the other hand, gure 2 shows a feed-back system. The response C(s) is measured
using the sensor H(s) and the resultant is compared with the input R(s). The resultant dierence
(error) is acted upon by the controller which works on the actuator. The actuator then applies
the required force on the system.
The closed loop thus contains the sensor dynamics, the controller dynamics, the actuator
dynamics in addition to the system we are interested in. It should be noted that all measurements
have to be done or converted if necessary into one unit so that comparison with the target signal
is possible. Usually, measurements result in currents and voltages. Hence, this conversion from a
mechanical input to an electrical output are also included in the sensor, controller and actuator
dynamics.
In designing the full control system the dynamics of all the components need to be accounted
for. If the controller is very slow compared to the system, it will not send the right input at
the right time. In this class, we will assume perfect sensor and actuator dynamics, i.e., what
goes into the sensor (it is commonly denoted by H(s)) and the actuator comes out unmodied
instantaneously. So we replace them with unity transfer functions.
r(t)
actuator
SYSTEM
force
c(t)
Figure 1: An open loop system.
r(t)
R(s)
controller actuator

system
c(t)
C(s)
sensor
Figure 2: Closed loop or feed-back control system.
The above feedback system can be shown as in gure 3 where the forward path controller-
actuator-system are shown as G(s) and the return sensor path is shown as H(s). It can be shown
that in this feedback conguration
C(s)
R(s)
=
G(s)
1 + G(s)H(s)
=
G(s)
1 + G(s))
, when H(s) = 1
We will in our class assume H(s) = 1. These are called unity feedback systems. They imply that
the sensors have perfect dynamics: they are very quick and have very high natural frequencies.
2
R(s)
+
-
r(t) c(t)
G(s)
e(t)
E(s)
C(s)
b(t)
B(s)
H(s)
Figure 3: Closed loop feedback system in typical terminology.
2 Typical control problems and step response
Typical control system problems include
Canon, telescope, radar dish pointing
Speed maintainance of a vehicle
Automated stoppage of a metro-rail
Robot arm movement from one position to another
Ship changes course
The above list is far from exhaustive. However, it is intended to show that many control applica-
tions involve the tracking of a given command signal. Thus, how quickly and smoothly the system
tracks without too much deviations and oscillations is a big issue. Such information is contained
in the step response of a control system. A step input is given to the physical system and the
response carries information about the speed of response and damping inherent in the system.
In looking at the step response of systems we shall make use of Laplace Transforms. In the next
section we take a brief look at the same.
3 Laplace Transform (LT)
The Laplace transform of a function x(t) is given by
X(s) =

x(t)e
st
dt (1)
We deal with causal systems, (systems which respond after the input is given) and hence the lower
limit is 0 for us. LT can be used to solve ordinary dierential equations (ODEs).
3.1 Example 1
For e.g., given an ODE of the form
x(t) + 4x(t) = (t).
taking the LT results in
s
2
X(s) s x(0) x(0) + 4X(s) = 1
3
For the time being, taking the initial conditions to be zero gives
X(s) =
1
s
2
+ 4
(2)
the inverse LT of which gives the time domain response
x(t) =
1
2
sin(2t). (3)
The s values where X(s) goes to innity are called the poles of X(s). In this case they are given
by +2i and 2i. Keeping this is in view, let us look at the plot of x(t) given below in gure 4.
The response is seen to be a pure undecaying oscillation.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time domain response of example 1
time t in secs
x
(
t
)
=
0
.
5
*
s
i
n
(
2
t
)
Figure 4: Time domain response for example 1.
3.2 Example 2
For e.g., given an ODE of the form
x(t) + 3 x(t) + 4x(t) = (t).
Applying the LT operator (for zero initial conditions) gives
X(s) =
1
s
2
+ 3s + 4
=
1
s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
, (4)
where = 0.75 and
n
= 2. The inverse LT (using tables) of which gives the time domain response
x(t) =
1

n
1

1
2
e
nt
sin(
n

1
2
t). (5)
The s values where X(s) goes to innity are called the poles of X(s). In this case they are given
by 1.5 + i 1.3229 and 1.5 i 1.3229. Keeping this is in view, let us look at the plot of x(t)
given below in gure 5. The response is a decaying oscillation.
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
time t in secs
x
(
t
)
Time domain response of example 2
Figure 5: Time domain response for example 2.
3.3 Example 3
For e.g., given an ODE of the form
x(t) 4x(t) = (t).
taking the LT results in
s
2
X(s) s x(0) x(0) 4X(s) = 1
For the time being, taking the initial conditions to be zero gives
X(s) =
1
s
2
4
=
1
4(s 2)

1
4(s + 2)
, (6)
the inverse LT of which gives the time domain response
x(t) = Ae
2t
+ Be
2t
. (7)
where A =
1
4
and B =
1
4
. The poles for this case are at s = 2.
Let us plot this response in Matlab and see how it looks. It is an exponentially increasing
response going o to innity.
3.4 Example 4
For e.g., given an ODE of the form
x(t) 3 x(t) + 4x(t) = (t).
Applying the LT operator (for zero initial conditions) gives
X(s) =
1
s
2
3s + 4
, (8)
the inverse LT of which gives the time domain response
x(t) =
1

n
1

1
2
e
nt
sin(
n

1
2
t). (9)
5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
time t in secs
x
(
t
)
=
A
e
2
t
+
B
e

2
t
Time domain response for example 3
Figure 6: Time domain response for example 3.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
300
200
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
time t in secs
x
(
t
)
Time domain response for example 4
Figure 7: Time domain response for example 4.
6
The s values where X(s) goes to innity are called the poles of X(s). In this case they are given
by 1.5 + i 1.3229 and 1.5 i 1.3229. Keeping this is in view, let us look at the plot of x(t)
given below in gure 7. The response is an exponentially increasing oscillating response going to
innity.
From the impulse responses of the systems given above, one can say that poles on the imaginary
axis cause the system to oscillate and complex poles with negative real parts give the system a
decaying oscillation while complex poles with positive real parts cause the response to go to
innity (the system is unstable). The nature of response is similar even when the input is a step.
This picture can be generalized as in gure 8.
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
Pole zero map
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
6 4 2 0 2 4 6
2
0
2
Real Axis
I
m
a
g

A
x
i
s
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.5
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
0
0.5
1
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
1
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
1
2
0 1 2 3 4 5
20
0
20
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
5000
10000
Figure 8: Pole locations and step response of second order systems.
4 Second order system characteristics
Oscillatory systems with single, multi degrees of freedom can be represented in the form
m x(t) + c x(t) + kx(t) = F(t).
7
The equation above can be a single scalar or a system of equations. For a scalar system if we
make the following substitution
c = 2

km and
n
2
=
k
m
then we get
x(t) + 2
n
x(t) +
n
2
x(t) =
F(t)
m
.
The LT of the above equation results in
X(s) =
1
m
F(s)
s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
,
where F(s) can be a delta or a step function or any function. The transfer function is said to be
of second order since it has s
2
in the denominator as the highest power of s. These second order
systems display characteristics typical of vibrating systems so much so that even higher order
systems can be understood by breaking them up into a set of second order systems (a polynomial
with real coecients has either real roots or conjugate complex roots). Thus, we try to understand
the typical features of second order systems.
We choose a typical second order transfer function of the form
C(s)
R(s)
=

n
2
s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
, (10)
the denominator of which is called the characteristic polynomial and which when set to zero gives
the roots of the characteristic polynomial as shown below
= s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
= 0 (11)
The roots are the poles of the second order transfer function above.
s
1
, s
2
=
n
j
n

1
2
= j
d
. (12)
When this second order system is subjected to a step input it becomes
C(s) =

n
2
s(s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
)
(13)
C(s) =
1
s

s + 2
n
s
2
+ 2
n
s +
n
2
C(s) =
1
s

s +
n
(s +
n
)
2
+
d
2


n
(s +
n
)
2
+
d
2
We have inverse LT of
s +
n
(s +
n
)
2
+
d
2
= e
nt
cos(
d
t) (14)

d
(s +
n
)
2
+
d
2
= e
nt
sin(
d
t)
And so
c(t) = 1 e
nt

cos(
d
t) +

1
2
sin(
d
t)

8
or
c(t) = 1
e
nt

1
2
sin

d
t + tan
1

1
2

t 0 (15)
The error
e(t) = r(t) c(t) (16)
e(t) = e
nt

cos(
d
t) +

1
2
sin(
d
t)

goes to zero at t = .
5 Second order step response indices
Maximum overshoot: The maximum overshoot is dened as the largest deviation of the
output over the step input during the transient state. The amount of maximum overshoot
is also used as a measure of relative stability of the system. The maximum overshoot is
often represented as a percentage of the nal value of the response, i.e.,
%max. overshoot =
maximumovershoot
finalvalue
x100%
Delay Time: The delay time t
d
is dened as the time required for the step response to reach
50% of its nal value.
Rise Time: The rise time t
r
is dened as the time required for the step response to rise from
10% to 90% of its nal value (overdamped). For under damped, we take the time to reach
100 % of the value the rst time.
Settling Time: The settling time t
s
is dened as the time required for the step response to
decrease and stay withina specied percentage of its nal value. Usually 5%
Rise time t
r
By setting C(t
r
) = 1 we get
1 = 1 e
ntr

cos(
d
t
r
) +

1
2
sin(
d
t
r
)

cos(
d
t
r
) +

1
2
sin(
d
t
r
) = 0
tan(
d
t
r
) =

1
2

t
r
=
1

d
tan
1

d
as in gure 9.
Peak time t
p
9
Dierentiating c(t) w.r.t. t and setting it to zero we get
dc
dt
|
tp
= sin(
d
t
p
)

n

1
2
e
ntp
= 0
sin(
d
t
p
) = 0
or

d
t
p
= 0, , 2, 3, ...
The peak time corresponds to the rst peak and so
t
p
=

d
which corresponds to one-half cycle of the frequency of damped oscillations.
10
Maximum overshoot M
p
The maximum overshoot occurs at the peak time t
p
. Substituting for t
p
in the equation for
c(t) we get
M
p
= c(t
p
) 1
= e
n

cos() +

1
2
sin()

= e
(/
d
)
= e
/

1
2
The maximum percent overshoot is M
p
x 100 %
Settling time t
s
From the expression for c(t) if we ignore the sine term then the response lies
within the envelope given by
1 e
nt
/

1
2
For small values of , the denominator can be ignored and and so if we set a 1% criterion for
settling time, we get
t
s
=
4.6

for 2% we get
t
s
=
4

and for 5% we get

t
s
=
3

. Given t
r
, M
p
, and t
s
, we should be able to nd the pole positions.
From the response equation above it can be seen that is representative of damping and
n
represents the frequency of oscillation (the natural quickness of the system). If we plot the root
positions as in gure 9, then cos() = so that the smaller is the larger is the damping. Or
the more toward the real axis the root, the more the damping is. Also, the absolute distance of
the root from the origin of the omplex plane is
n
the frequency of oscillation. The farther the
root from the origin, the faster the system is.
Root
X
X

n
j

0
Root
=
n
s-plane

1
2
=
n
Figure 9: Position of the complex root. Natural frequency and damping.
11
References
[1] Benjamin Kuo, 1982, Automatic Control Systems, Prentice Hall of India.
12