Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CaCO
3(s)
+CO
2
+H
2
O (1)
Various methods were used to prevent scaling, for example by
water decarbonation using electrochemical processes, seeding or
acid addition. Other way consists in blocking the nucleation and
crystal growthby adding chemical inhibitors. However these chem-
icals are generally deleterious for human health and their use is
forbidden in drinking water. Therefore, various physical methods
were developed to avoid chemicals addition. In particular magnetic
treatment (MT) methods of hard waters are currently used to pre-
C).
This gure demonstrates clearly that the application of the MF
increases signicantly the total precipitation ratio for all used pipes
material. This increase in
TP
was more pronounced in the case of
PTFE and Tygon where it increased by about 10 and 17%, respec-
tively. This MF effect on
TP
is less important for copper, SS and
PVC (not presented in Fig. 3) pipes. However, the inuence of the
pipe material in the absence of MF is somewhat surprising. For
example, for a owrate of 0.54L min
1
,
TP
decreased from73% for
Tygon to 50% for PTFE pipe. To our knowledge this effect has never
been mentioned until now. Moreover, in the absence of MF the total
amount of precipitated CaCO
3
did not depend signicantly on the
ow rate, whatever the pipe material. Nevertheless,
TP
increases
with the owrate () when water was magnetically treated in con-
ductive materials (SS and copper). This increase was about 5%when
passed from 0.54 to 0.94L min
1
.
On the other hand, the precipitated CaCO
3
was formed both by
homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation processes and hence
was deposited either in bulk solution and/or on the walls of the
reactor made of polyamide, respectively. Fig. 5 shows experimental
measurements of the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated in
the bulk of the solution
HP
.
Fig. 5. Effect of all tested pipes material on CaCO
3
homogeneous precipitation rate
with and without magnetic treatment ([Ca
2+
] =410
3
M; T =30
C).
1330 F. Alimi et al. / Chemical Engineering and Processing 48 (2009) 13271332
This gureproves that theapplicationof MF increases thehomo-
geneous precipitation ratio and, as for
TP
, its effect on
HP
is pipe
material-dependent. Contrarily to
TP
, the ratio of CaCO
3
formed
in the bulk solution is ow rate-dependent. It increases with the
owrate. This means that the magnetic treatment reduces the het-
erogeneous nucleation and can, therefore, protect the wall against
scaling. It can be also concluded that when water passes through
the PTFE pipe in the magnetic device, the increase of
HP
is the
greatest (7%).
3.2. Inuence of the material conductivity on the MT
According to the results presented in Figs. 4 and 5, the MF effect
on total and homogeneously precipitated CaCO
3
is less signicant if
water is treatedby using conductive materials (copper or SS). More-
over, it was shown that the total precipitated calcium carbonate
in magnetically treated solutions is ow rate-dependent. To con-
rm this relationship between material conductivity, precipitated
CaCO
3
ratios andhydrodynamic conditions andtoavoidanybesides
effects such as oxydo-reduction reactions which can occur on the
walls [17], two pipes made of Teon were tested: non-conductive
white PTFE and an electroconductive anti-static black PTFE.
Fig. 6ashows that thetreatment owratehas animportant inu-
enceonthetotal precipitationratiowhenaconductivematerial was
used (black PTFE): e.g., the determined
TP
in magnetically treated
Fig. 6. Inuence of material conductivity on (a) total and (b) homogeneous CaCO
3
precipitation ratios ([Ca
2+
] =410
3
M; T =30
C; pipe: PVC).
solutions at the lowest ow rate are about 55 and 60% when con-
ductive andnon-conductive materials were, respectively, used. This
physical parameter inuences in the same way the effect of MT on
CaCO
3
precipitated in the bulk solution as shown in Fig. 6b: e.g., for
a owrate of 0.54L min
1
,
HP
increased by 28 and 8% with respect
to non treated water through non-conductive and conductive PTFE
pipes, respectively. In agreement with results obtained with metal-
lic pipes, this material property (conductivity) inhibits partially the
effect of MF on
TP
and
HP
especially toward the lower ow rates.
3.3. Inuence of the wall roughness
Since the ow rate has an important effect on CaCO
3
precipi-
tation (Figs. 5 and 6b) and that the surface state of the tubing can
inuence the hydrodynamic parameters [25], we have tested the
effect of a water treatment in PVC pipes with different roughness
on the CaCO
3
crystallization process.
Three levels of roughness were tested: smooth pipe, polished
pipes using abrasive papers of 320 and 80. The temperature, pH
and ow rate of treatment were xed at 22
and CO
3
2
. According to Lungader
Madsen [10,39], MF induces faster proton transfer from hydrogen
carbonate to water, due to proton spin inversion in the eld of
diamagnetic salts. The increased formation of CO
3
2
ions would
explain the benecial effect of MF on the amount of precipitate
(Figs. 3, 4, 6a and 7a). Another explanation proposed by Higashitani
et al. [20] is related to the specic inuence of MF on the hydration
of CO
3
2
ions which could directly modify the polymorph phase
equilibriumduringprecipitation. The same phenomenoncouldalso
affect the dehydration process of the ionic pair associations and
the hydrated calcium carbonate forms which act as precursors for
the formation of the anhydrous forms which constitute the calcium
carbonate precipitate [19].
On the other hand, MF application has a magnetohydrody-
namic (MHD) effect. Lorenz forces exerted on charged species
induce local convection movements in the liquid which could
contribute to accelerate associations between ions or colloidal par-
ticles [14,15]. Moreover, MHD phenomena induce eddy currents
which attened the uid velocity prole in the tube. This effect
would result in a larger velocity gradient, along the walls. This
can accentuate the release of impurities by erosion. In addition,
the streaming potential along the walls should increase with the
magnetic eld. This phenomenon, by changing the surface charge,
could throw out of balance the calcocarbonic equilibrium in the
vicinity of the tubing walls [23]. However, hydrodynamic forces as
well as the electrokinetic phenomena along the walls, which could
favour the process of ionic pair micellization, are pipe material-
dependent. This can explain the net difference on the effect of MT
on homogeneous and total precipitation ratios with pipes material
(Figs. 4 and 5).
To conclude, the magnetic water treatment decreases scaling
by encouraging the homogeneous nucleation process of calcium
carbonate. The choice of the pipe material seems a determinant
parameter for the success of this MT. Non-conductive materials can
be considered as the most efcient inthis application. As PTFE gives
the lower total precipitation (Fig. 4) and the higher homogeneous
precipitationratio(Fig. 5), it seems the most appropriate comparing
to all others tested materials.
1332 F. Alimi et al. / Chemical Engineering and Processing 48 (2009) 13271332
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the CMCU international pro-
gram Projet de Rseau Elargi CMCU (04PR01) intitul Gestion des
Ressources en Eaux Non Conventionnelles. Procds de Traitement
Pour Potabilisation et Rutilisation.
Appendix A. Nomenclature
MHD magnetohydrodynamic
MF magnetic eld
MT magnetic treatment
t
ind
the induction time
m
i
mass of CaCO
3
initially dissolved
m
t
mass of the total precipitate
m
h
mass of homogeneous CaCO
3
precipitate
ow rate of treatment
TP
the total precipitation ratio
HP
the homogeneous precipitation ratio
References
[1] B.R. Heywood, S. Rajam, S. Mann, Oriented crystallization of CaCO
3
under
compressed monolayers. Part 2. Morphology, structure and growth of imma-
ture crystals, Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 87 (1991)
735744.
[2] J.S. Park, J.H. Yang, D.H. Kim, D.H. Lee, Degradability of expanded starch/PVA
blends prepared using calciumcarbonate as the expanding inhibitor, Journal of
Applied Polymer Science 93 (2004) 911919.
[3] S.R. Dickinson, K.M. McGrath, Aqueous precipitationof calciumcarbonate mod-
ied by hydroxyl-containing compounds, Crystal Growth and Design 4 (2004)
14111418.
[4] Proceedings of the International Meeting of Antiscale magnetic treatment,
School of Water Sciences, Craneld University, UK, 1996.
[5] J. Bogatin, N.P. Bondarenko, E.Z. Gak, E.F. Rokhinson, I.P. Ananyev, Magnetic
treatment of irrigation water: experimental results and application conditions,
Environmental Science and Technology 33 (1999) 12801285.
[6] MAG 3, Proceedings of anti-scale magnetic treatment and physical conditions,
School of Water Sciences, Craneld University, UK, 1999.
[7] J. Baker, S. Judd, Magnetic amelioration of scale formation, Water Research 30
(1996) 247260.
[8] V. Kozic, L.C. Lipus, Magnetic water treatment for a less tenacious scale, Journal
of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 43 (2003) 18151819.
[9] K. Higashitani, J. Oshitani, Magnetic effects on thickness of adsorbed layer in
aqueous solutions evaluated directly by atomic force microscope, Journal of
Colloid and Interface Science 204 (1998) 363368.
[10] H.E. Lungader Madsen, Crystallization of calcium carbonate in magnetic eld
ordinary and heavy water, Journal of Crystal Growth 267 (2004) 251255.
[11] E. Chibowski, L. Holysz, A. Szczes, M. Chibowski, Some magnetic eld effects
on in situ precipitated calcium carbonate, Water Science and Technology 49
(2004) 169176.
[12] J. Hartmann, Hg-dynamics I: theory of the laminar ow of an electrically
conductive liquid in a homogeneous magnetic eld, Kibenhavske Selskab af
Laerdoms og Videnskabers Elskere 6 (1937) 128.
[13] J. Hartmann, F. Lazarus, Hg-dynamics II: experimental investigations on the
ow of mercury in a homogeneous magnetic eld, Kibenhavske Selskab af
Laerdoms og Videnskabers Elskere 7 (1937) 145.
[14] K.W. Busch, S. opalakrishnan, M.A. Busch, E. Tombacz, Magnetohydrodynamic
aggregation of cholesterol and polystyrene latex suspensions, Journal of Colloid
and Interface Science 183 (1996) 528538.
[15] S. Martemianov, A. Sviridov, Study of near wall hydrodynamics and mass trans-
fer under magnetic eld inuence, in: A. Alemany, Ph. Marty, J.P. Thibault (Eds.),
Transfer Phenomena in Magnetohydrodynamic and Electroconducting Flows,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, p. 229.
[16] L.C. Lipus, J. Krope, L. Crepinsek, Dispersion destabilization in magnetic water
treatment, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 236 (2001) 6066.
[17] K.W. Busch, M.A. Busch, Laboratory studies on magnetic water treatment and
their relationshiptoa possible mechanismfor scale reduction, Desalination109
(1997) 131148.
[18] C. Gabrielli, R. Jaouhari, G. Maurin, M. Keddam, Magnetic water treatment for
scale prevention, Water Research 35 (2001) 32493259.
[19] F. Alimi, M. Tlili, C. Gabrielli, G. Maurin, M. Ben Amor, Effect of a magnetic
water treatment on homogeneous and heterogeneous precipitation of calcium
carbonate, Water Research 40 (2006) 19411950.
[20] K. Higashitani, K. Okuhara, S. Hatade, Effects of magnetic elds on stability
of nonmagnetic ultrane colloidal particles, Journal of Colloid and Interface
Science 152 (1992) 125131.
[21] K. Higashitani, A. Kage, S. Katamura, K. Imai, S. Hatade, Effects of magnetic eld
on formation of CaCO
3
particles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 156
(1993) 9095.
[22] E. Chibowski, L. Hotysz, A. Szczes, Adhesion of in situ precipitated calcium car-
bonate in the presence and absence of magnetic eld in quiescent conditions
on different solid surfaces, Water Research 37 (2003) 46854692.
[23] S. Knez, C. Pohar, The magnetic eld inuence on the polymorph composition
of CaCO
3
precipitation from carbonized aqueous solutions, Journal of Colloid
and Interface Science 281 (2005) 377388.
[24] L. Dedieu, C. Hort, A. Martin-Dominguez, M. Rola, H. Roques, Contribution
ltude des phnomnes dentartrage. 1
re
partie: Gnralits et mthodes
dtude LCGE, Tribune de leau 48 (1994) 319.
[25] J. Kussin, M. Sommerfeld, Experimental studies on particle behaviour and tur-
bulence modication in horizontal channel owwith different wall roughness,
Experiments in Fluids 33 (2002) 143159.
[26] G.A. Junk, H.J. Svec, R.D. Vick, M.J. Avery, Contamination of water by
synthetic polymer tubes, Environmental Science and Technology 8 (1974)
11001106.
[27] C.M. Curran, M.B. Tomson, Leaching of trace organics into water fromve com-
mon plastics, Ground Water Monitoring Review 3 (1983) 6871.
[28] M.J. Barcelona, J.A. Helfrich, E.E. Garske, Sampling tubing effects on ground
water samples, Analytical Chemistry 57 (1985) 460464.
[29] J.F. Devlin, Recommendations concerning materials and pumping systems used
in the sampling of groundwater contaminated with volatile organics, Water
Quality Research Journal of Canada 22 (1987) 6572.
[30] L.V. Parker, T.A. Ranney, Sampling Trace-Level Organics with Polymeric Tubing.
Special Report 96-3(1996), US Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research
and Engineering Laboratory.
[31] M.C. Amiri, A.A. Dadkhah, On reduction in the surface tension of water due to
magnetic treatment, Colloids and Surfaces A 278 (2006) 252255.
[32] K.A. Flack, M.P. Schultz, T.A. Shapiro, Experimental support for Townsends
Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough walls, Physics of Fluids 17
(2005) 035102.
[33] M.A. Shockling, J.J. Allen, A.J. Smits, Roughness effects in turbulent pipe ow,
The Journal of Fluid Mechanics 564 (2006) 267285.
[34] J.Y. Gal, J.C. Bollinger, H. Tolosa, N. Gache, Calcium carbonate solubil-
ity, a reappraisal of scale formation and inhibition, Talanta 43 (1996)
14971509.
[35] M.M. Tlili, M. Ben Amor, C. Gabrielli, S. Joiret, G. Maurin, On the initial stages of
calcium carbonate precipitation, European Journal of Water Quality 37 (2006)
89101.
[36] H. Ell, A. Hannachi, Reconsidering water scaling tendency assessment, AIChE
Journal 52 (2006) 35833591.
[37] I. Greenwald, The dissociationof calciumandmagnesiumcarbonates andbicar-
bonates, Journal of Biology Chemistry 141 (1941) 789794.
[38] L.N. Plumber, E. Busenberg, The solubilities of calcite, aragonite and vaterite
in CO
2
H
2
O solutions between 0 and 90