Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jcat
Solution syntheses of unsupported Co(Ni)MoS hydrotreating catalysts
D. Genuit, P. Afanasiev
, M. Vrinat
Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse, 2, Avenue Albert Einstein, 69626 Villeurbanne cedex, France
Received 30 April 2005; revised 25 August 2005; accepted 25 August 2005
Abstract
Highly dispersed Ni(Co)MoS suldes were prepared by simple room temperature solution reactions using nickel or cobalt salts and
thiomolybdate precursors in the presence of nonionic surfactants. The products were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, specic sur-
face area measurements, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The evolution from amorphous pre-catalysts to highly dispersed
sulde catalysts during the activation step was studied by thermal analysis. Extended X-ray absorption ne structure measurements were carried
out to elucidate the chemical environment of the transition metals in the precursors and the sulded catalysts. The specic catalytic activities
of the Ni(Co)MoS systems in the hydrodesulfurization of thiophene and 4,6-DMDBT were up to six times higher than those of commercial
alumina-supported systems.
2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Suldes; Cobalt; Molybdenum; Hydrotreating; EXAFS
1. Introduction
Because of the need to minimize the negative environmental
effects of automotive and nontransportation exhaust emissions,
the authorized sulfur level in motor fuels has been gradually
decreasing during the recent years. Many different approaches
have been proposed to eliminate sulfur-containing molecules
from the petroleum feedstocks. Some of these proposals are
based on novel processes, whereas others attempt to improve
on the existing hydrotreatment (HDT) technology. Because of
the much lower investment costs, the use of more active cata-
lysts is the most attractive solution for petroleum reners. Such
a demand for more active HDT catalysts has triggered a sig-
nicant increase in research activity on HDT catalysts [14].
These studies have shown in particular that one way to improve
the MoS
2
-based catalysts could be to increase the active phase
loading or use bulk suldes. The emergence of highly loaded
sulde catalysts [5,6] demonstrates that sulde-based systems,
even though known for many years, still have great potential for
improvement.
Molybdenum disulde (MoS
2
) promoted with Ni or Co is
the basis of commercial HDS catalysts [713]. It is commonly
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: afanas@catalyse.cnrs.fr (P. Afanasiev).
accepted that in the active structures of these catalysts, the pro-
moter atoms are located at the edges of the MoS
2
sheets in the
form of the so-called Ni(Co)MoS structures. The catalytic
activity is strongly dependent on the dispersion of the MoS
2
phase and the ratio of edge sites to basal plane area, as well as
on the stacking of the MoS
2
slabs. Therefore, control of MoS
2
morphology is crucial to obtaining highly active HDS catalysts.
Various alternative methods for preparing dispersed MoS
2
have been developed recently, including thermal decomposition
of thiosalts [1416], hydrothermal and solvothermal processes
[1721], and solution reactions [22,23]. Thus prepared, bulk
or highly loaded supported molybdenum sulde can be further
promoted by cobalt or nickel [2426]. However, introduction of
the promoter always represents a delicate procedure, and simple
methods for one-step preparation of promoted sulde disper-
sions still represent a challenge. The present work deals with
such simple solution reactions.
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation of the catalysts
Catalyst preparation was carried out in two stages. First,
the pre-catalysts were prepared in the aqueous or mixed so-
0021-9517/$ see front matter 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.08.016
D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317 303
Table 1
Preparation conditions and properties of selected catalysts after suldation
Solid
designation
Precursors and
surfactant used
Chemical composition S
(m
2
/g)
R(p)
a
(nm)
MoS
2
size,
XRD ()
R(HDS), 573 K
(10
8
mol/(g s))
r
b
C (wt%)
Co-DH
2
O TDM, Co(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O 0.19 Traces 52 2.1 37 30
Co-DEG TDM, Co(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.24 0.9 31 1.8 31 62
EG (50%)
c
Co-DTer TDM, Co(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.11 1.7 21 2.4 27 51
Tergitol (10%)
Co-D TDM, Co(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.28 4.3 132 2.4 24 213
EG (50%), Tergitol (10%)
Co-M TMM, Co(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.48 2.8 114 29 151
EG, Tergitol (10%)
Ni-D TDM, Ni(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.24 3.5 130 2.7 22 416
EG (50%), Tergitol (10%)
Ni-M TMM, Ni(NO
3
)
2
, H
2
O, 0.51 2.6 122 10.5 38 111
EG (50%), Tergitol (10%)
CoA-D TDM, Co(acac)
2
, H
2
O, 0.23 2.6 134 4.1 25 275
EG (50%), Tergitol (10%)
NiA-D TDM, Niacac, H
2
O, 0.24 3.5 132 7.5 22 461
EG (50%), Tergitol (10%)
a
Mean pore size, nm.
b
r =Co/(Co +Mo) atomic ratio.
c
EGethylene glycol, volume proportions are given.
lutions, and then they were sulded by gaseous reactants. To
prepare the pre-catalysts, high-purity starting materials were
purchased from SigmaAldrich. Ammonium thiomonomolyb-
date (NH
4
)
2
MoS
4
(TMM) was obtained by adding 15 g of
(NH
4
)
6
Mo
7
O
24
4H
2
O to 200 ml of a 20 wt% aqueous solu-
tion of (NH
4
)
2
S at ambient temperature. The precipitated red
crystals were thoroughly washed with ethanol, dried, and stored
under nitrogen. Ammonium thiodimolybdate (NH
4
)
2
Mo
2
S
12
(TDM) was prepared as described previously [27]. Several sub-
stances of the same family of surfactants were tried as textural
promoters. The length and the branching of the aliphatic tail,
as well as the length of the polyethoxo fragment, were var-
ied. Triton X114 [polyoxyethylene (8) isooctylphenyl ether],
Triton X100 [polyoxyethylene (10) isooctylphenyl ether], Ter-
gitol NPX [polyoxyethylene (9) nonylphenyl ether], and other
grades of the same molecule Imbentin N 60 [polyoxyethylene
(9) nonylphenyl ether] were tried as surfactants.
In a typical pre-catalyst preparation (Co-D specimen), 50 ml
of aqueous solution containing 1 g (0.003 mol) of Co(NO
3
)
2
6H
2
O was added to a solution of 2 g (about 0.003 mol) of
TDM in 100 ml distilled water, 100 ml of ethylene glycol (EG),
and 30 ml nonionic surfactant Triton X114. The resulting dark
precipitate was separated by centrifugation and dried overnight
under vacuum at 353 K. To obtain the sulde catalyst, the dried
pre-catalyst was sulded in owing 15 vol% H
2
S in H
2
at at-
mospheric pressure at 723 K for 4 h. The sulding gas ow was
3.6 l/h, and the heating rate was 5 K/min. Several synthesis pa-
rameters were varied, including the nature of the reactants and
surfactant and the ratio of the transition metals in the solution.
The solid designations are listed in Table 1.
Commercial supported catalysts containing 3 wt% Co(Ni)
and 10 wt% Mo supported on gamma alumina were used as
references. These were sulded under the same conditions as
the unsupported solids.
2.2. Characterization of the solids
The N
2
adsorption and desorption isotherms were measured
on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument. Pore size distri-
butions of the samples in the mesopore domain were calcu-
lated from the isotherms by the BarrettJoynerHallenda (BJH)
method. The BJH pore size distributions were calculated from
the desorption branch of the isotherms. The X-ray diffraction
(XRD) patterns were obtained on a Bruker diffractometer with
Cu-K
(MS
4
)
2
]
n
(n =2 or 3, M
6H
2
O (a), Co(acac)
2
(b), and Co
9
S
8
(c).
Fig. 15. Pre-edge and near Co K-edge regions for the spectra of several pre-
catalysts and Co-D solid after suldation.
of XRD detectable Co
9
S
8
after suldation, their EXAFS spec-
tra were not measured. The pre-edge regions of the X-ray ab-
sorption spectra of Co nitrate, acetylacetonate, the Co
9
S
8
ref-
erence, and our catalysts were analyzed using normalization of
the edge jump, followed by subtraction of the background. The
features at the pre-edge region can be related to the symmetry
of the Co atoms, because the intensity of the pre-edge feature
is greater for tetrahedral or distorted octahedral symmetry than
for octahedral symmetry due to greater pd mixing in the rst
case [5759].
The Co K edges in the X-ray adsorption near-edge struc-
tures (XANES) region of the precursors, dry pre-catalyst, and
sulded solids are shown in Figs. 14 and 15. For all catalysts,
the edge shape was changed from the precursor to the dry pre-
cipitate and then again on suldation. Analysis of the XANES
of the precursor cobalt salts and the dried precipitates showed
that the characteristic white line attributed to Co and Ni in the
oxygen environment was absent in the pre-catalysts. A low in-
tensity of the Co K-edge white line in the CoMoS pre-catalysts
indicated an increased electron population in the cobalt (nickel)
third level. At the same time, the energy position of the adsorp-
tion edges in the pre-catalysts shifted toward lower energies,
in agreement with the sulded state of the Co species [59
61]. A small but reliably determined pre-edge shoulder above
D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317 313
(a)
(b)
Fig. 16. Two-shell t of the Co K-edge for the dried pre-catalyst Co-D in the
k-space (a) and R space (b). Imimaginary part.
7710 eV was observed in the spectra of the pre-catalysts, due to
quadrupole and vibronically allowed 1s3d transition (Fig. 15).
Because a pre-edge peak is not expected for an octahedral coor-
dination, this could be due to a tetrahedral or square-pyramidal
environment of cobalt. This feature was absent in the cobalt ni-
trate and acetylacetonate precursors (Fig. 14). Thus we infer
that the cobalt coordination changed from the oxygen octahe-
dra in the precursors to the sulfur tetrahedra in the pre-catalysts.
This conclusion was conrmed by the results of tting the
EXAFS spectra (Fig. 16). The quantitative analysis of the spec-
tra (Table 3) showed that in the pre-catalysts, cobalt has about
four sulfur neighbors and its coordination is tetrahedral rather
than distorted octahedral. The tting suggested the presence of
molybdenum neighbors in the pre-catalysts. Treatment of the
spectra using the difference le technique also conrmed the
presence of this shell (Fig. 17a). The
2
parameter of closely
bound sulfur was lower than that of the farther away molybde-
num, presumably due to the high degree of static disorder in
these solids.
After decomposition at 673 K, the local Co environment
clearly changed. The k
3
-weighted phase-corrected spectra
showed the presence of a well-resolved feature at a distance
of about 2.81 , probably corresponding to the CoMo contri-
bution, similar to that of the CoMoS phase observed earlier
[62,63]. Analysis of the phase-corrected spectra of the differ-
Table 3
Parameters resulting from the t of Co(Ni) K-edge k
2
-weighted EXAFS spec-
tra for the unsupported catalysts and commercial references (k =312
1
,
R =0.54 )
Sample Atom R
()
R N N
2
(
2
)
E
(eV)
R
(%)
Co-DNH
3
S 2.21 0.0015 3.2 0.07 0.0093 2.2 4
Co 3.14 0.004 1.1 0.1 0.0075 10.1
Co-D S 2.19 0.006 3.7 0.4 0.007 1.6 12
Mo 3.26 0.003 0.8 0.4 0.009 5.0
Ni-D S 2.21 0.008 3.7 0.3 0.008 1.4 16
Mo 3.24 0.03 0.7 0.4 0.011 5.2
Ni-D S 2.20 0.006 3.2 0.2 0.006 2.1 11
sulded ex situ Mo 2.81 0.003 1.1 0.4 0.007 4.3
Ni-D S 2.19 0.007 3.6 0.5 0.009 1.8 19
Imbentin Mo 3.25 0.03 0.8 0.4 0.013 3.8
Ni-D S 2.19 0.007 3.1 0.3 0.006 2.4 14
Imbentin Mo 2.82 0.03 1.5 0.3 0.0065 4.5
sulded ex situ
NiA-D S 2.20 0.008 3.4 0.4 0.009 1.3 16
Mo 3.27 0.03 0.6 0.4 0.012 4.4
CoA-D S 2.19 0.008 3.5 0.4 0.009 1.2 14
Mo 3.24 0.04 0.7 0.4 0.012 3.8
CoA-D S 2.21 0.007 3.3 0.5 0.006 2.0 15
sulded in situ Mo 2.81 0.03 1.2 0.4 0.008 4.5
CoA-D S 2.20 0.008 3.5 0.5 0.007 1.5 14
sulded ex situ Mo 2.82 0.02 1.0 0.5 0.01 5.0
Co-D S 2.21 0.007 3.7 0.4 0.009 2.0 18
Triton X100 Mo 3.15 0.03 0.7 0.3 0.014 6.1
CoA-D S 2.21 0.008 3.8 0.3 0.0071 1.2 11
Triton X114 Mo 3.12 0.07 2.3 0.9 0.015 4.6
CoMo/Al
2
O
3
a
S 2.22 0.007 3.7 0.4 0.007 0.5 14
Mo 2.81 0.05 0.9 0.2 0.01 3.2
a
Commercial reference.
ence les conrmed this CoMo contribution (Fig. 17b). At the
same time, the
2
parameter for the CoS shell in the catalysts
was systematically lower than that in the pre-catalysts, suggest-
ing that some ordering occurred during the thermal activation.
Formation of Co
9
S
8
can be ruled out because in this case a
strong CoCo contribution should be seen at 2.50 due to the
presence of most cobalt atoms in this structure within the Co
8
cubes [64]. Therefore, for all of the catalysts, the EXAFS spec-
tra analysis, supported by the TEM results, suggests that the Co
atoms were included mostly in the CoMoS state (Table 3).
The Co atoms in this state have a distorted ve-fold sulfur co-
ordination, and every Co atom is in contact with Mo atoms at a
distance of 2.802.83 . As suggested in previous studies [62,
63], Co atoms are located in front of the square sulfur faces of
the MoS
6
trigonal prisms along the edges of the MoS
2
crys-
tallites. Note, however, that although the interatomic distances
obtained in the ts correspond fairly well to previously reported
data on the CoMoS phase, the coordination numbers obtained
in this work were, for some unexplained reason, systematically
lower than the values expected from the CoMoS phase model.
314 D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 17. Co K k
2
-weighted EXAFS Fourier transforms of the difference (k)
les (raw EXAFS minus CoS contribution) for the second neighbours contri-
butions: CoMo in the Co-D pre-catalyst (a), CoMo in the sulded Co-D (b),
and CoCo in the Co-D-NH
3
(c). Solid curves correspond to the difference
les; dashed curves represent the best t model.
Further elucidation of the CoMoS phase structure is beyond
the scope of this work.
Considerable differences were also noted between pre-
catalysts that provide highly active catalysts and those that do
not. In the latter case, considerable CoCo bonding was clearly
observed both in the shape of the FT curves and in the dif-
ference les (Fig. 17c). Thus, for the amorphous Co-DNH
3
pre-catalyst, a high-delity t with decorrelation of CN and
2
provides evidence of the presence of a Co neighbor, suggest-
ing the formation of the amorphous CoS compound. Replacing
cobalt with molybdenum as a second neighbor signicantly de-
creased the quality of the t in the model, which no longer
Fig. 18. FT module of Mo K EXAFS spectra of the ATDM precursor and sev-
eral Co and Ni derived pre-catalysts.
converged in k and R spaces. This excludes the formation of
amorphous cobalt thiomolybdate for the Co-DNH
3
solid. Ap-
parently, at basic pH, reactions other than (1) and (2) occurred
that included abstraction of sulde ion from the TDM species
and precipitation of cobalt sulde, leading to a poor catalytic
performance of this solid.
3.4.2. Molybdenum K edge
Comparison of the absolute FT parts and k-weighted os-
cillations of the Mo K spectra revealed a remarkable similar-
ity between the spectra of the TDM precursor and of several
TDM-derived pre-catalysts (Fig. 18). Judging from the differ-
ent backscattering amplitudes of the S and Mo atoms, the (k)
oscillations corresponded mostly to the S shell. The second
neighbor was not seen as a distinct peak or shoulder in the FT
curves of the pre-catalysts and the imaginary part of the FT
curves. However, analysis of the difference les and statistical
analysis using the F test demanded introduction of the molyb-
denum shell.
The XANES of the TDM and pre-catalysts were nearly in-
distinguishable, indicating that the Mo
2
S
12
entities were pre-
served in the pre-catalysts. The TDM precursor has a com-
plex structure in which the molybdenum atom has eight sulfur
neighbors at distances ranging from 2.383 to 2.477 [65].
One molybdenum neighbor is present at 2.823 . Using the
EXAFS spectrum of the TDM, we performed a t with nine
shells in which all distances and CN values were xed and
2
and E were varied but constrained to be equal for the same
type of bonds (and thus this model has only four tting parame-
ters). Then the results for
2
and E obtained for the TDM
were taken as a departure point for a two-shell t in which
the distances and CNs were allowed to vary as free parameters
(Fig. 19; Table 4). This simplication was necessary because it
is impossible to obtain a reasonably converging t using nine
shells of the TDM structure. Apart from software performance
limitations, the number of independent points in a typical mea-
surement, N
ind
=2kR/, is only about 2530; however, to
get an acceptable variance, the number of t parameters should
be considerably lower. But the CN values obtained for the ref-
D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317 315
(a)
(b)
Fig. 19. Two-shell t of Mo K edge in the Co-D dried pre-catalyst in the
k-space (a) and R space (b).
erence TDM specimen in the two-shell model t were signi-
cantly lower than the real values. The reason for this apparent
CN decrease was the spectral nonadditivity due to the phase
differences between several scatterers having close but unequal
distances. Indeed, a signicant negative interference exists be-
tween sulfur scatterers in TDM positioned at 2.38 and 2.47 ,
as veried by direct comparison of the model spectra. Taking
into account these limitations, the physical meaning of the t
parameters in this case should be considered a ngerprint of the
averaged multiple MoS bonds. Analysis of Table 4 shows no
important changes in the CNs and average distances of the pre-
cipitates compared with TDM. We found a slight increase of
the average bond distance in the precipitates compared with the
parent TDM and, as expected, higher
2
values for the MoS
bonds in the disordered precipitates.
Earlier, Hibble and Feaviour applied a two-shell model in
their study of the thermal decomposition of TDM [37]. The re-
sulting molybdenum CN was signicantly lower than it should
be in the starting TDM material. To deal with this discrepancy,
the authors had to introduce unrealistically high
2
factors
(0.012
2
in the crystalline TDM at room temperature). Using
model clusters, Clausen et al. [66], Shido and Prins [67], and
Calais et al. [68] demonstrated that CN is sensitive to the radial
distribution of the bonds and is lower than its actual value when
an asymmetric distribution is present and a normal data analy-
sis is performed. Note that the asymmetric distribution of bonds
Table 4
Parameters resulting from the t of Mo K-edge k
2
-weighted EXAFS spec-
tra for the unsupported catalysts and commercial references (two shell model
(k =2.514
1
, R =0.5-4 ))
Sample Atom R
()
R N N
(
2
)
E
(eV)
R
(%)
TDM S 2.440 0.005 5.8 0.2 0.0045 2.5 13
Precursor Mo 2.823 0.01 1.0 0.15 0.0041 9.1
Co-DNH
3
S 2.450 0.009 5.8 0.5 0.0050 3.0 17
Mo 2.815 0.02 1.2 0.8 0.0060 10
Co-D S 2.453 0.005 5.5 0.3 0.0063 3.4 9
Mo 2.819 0.03 1.2 0.3 0.0061 8.75
Co-D S 2.40 0.007 4.6 0.5 0.0029 3.2 21
sulded Mo 3.17 0.02 3.0 0.8 0.0045 9.2
Co-M S 2.38 0.009 3.5 0.6 0.0080 2.3 19
Mo 2.97 0.03 1.3 0.4 0.0110 9.0
Ni-D S 2.45 0.006 6.1 0.5 0.0055 1.7 9
Mo 2.82 0.015 0.8 0.3 0.0050 7.8
Ni-D S 2.41 0.007 4.1 0.4 0.0029 1.6 20
sulded Mo 3.146 0.013 2.6 0.7 0.0042 8.0
CoA-D S 2.448 0.007 5.7 0.4 0.0047 2.11 10
Triton X114 Mo 2.834 0.028 1.0 0.2 0.0066 8.58
Co-D Triton S 2.451 0.007 6.1 0.4 0.0051 2.7 9
Mo 2.818 0.02 0.9 0.15 0.0053 8.3
Co-D Triton S 2.408 0.007 4.7 0.5 0.0035 1.96 17
sulded Mo 3.168 0.015 2.9 0.9 0.0054 8.1
CoA-D S 2.44 0.008 5.8 0.5 0.0056 2.5 14
Triton X114 Mo 2.83 0.02 0.8 0.7 0.0065 9.0
is not equivalent to the effective increase in the static
2
para-
meter, because the spectrum damping at high k values is not the
same in both cases. Obviously, stating a rigorous approach to
the tting problem is not possible at present.
Whatever the model applied to t the spectra, it follows
from our results that the Mo
2
S
12
moieties were preserved in
the pre-catalysts. At the same time, the coordination sphere of
cobalt was changed drastically. Therefore, we assume that the
dithiomolybdate moieties were attached to cobalt with open-
ing of the disulde SS bonds and formation of covalent CoS
bonds. The tentative structural sketch of the pre-catalyst is de-
picted in Fig. 20. In agreement with reaction (2), the chemical
environment of molybdenum in the precipitates depended on
neither the nature of the VIII group metal precursor nor the
Fig. 20. Tentative model of the Co-D pre-catalyst structure. Light grey circles
S atoms; grey circlesMo atoms; black circlesCo atoms. For better presen-
tation not all the S atoms from the SS groups are connected to the Mo atoms,
even if they belong to the rst coordination sphere.
316 D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317
nature of this last metal. Indeed, nearly perfect coincidence
of the FT transforms was observed for the initial TDM and
pre-catalysts obtained from the nitrate or acetylacetonate pre-
cursors. The same was true for the comparison of the nickel-
and cobalt-containing pre-catalysts.
For the less important TMM-derived solids, we studied only
one Co-M specimen at the Mo K edge. Obviously, the TMM-
and TDM-derived solids exhibited large differences in the coor-
dination shell parameters. A low coordination number suggests
the presence of MoS
4
entities within the structure of the dried
Co-M precipitate. Comparison of the spectra of Co-M and Co-
D prepared under the same conditions showed considerably
higher
2
values for the TMM-derived solid. A highly disor-
dered amorphous CoMoS
4
compound can be envisaged as an
adequate model to explain our observations.
Suldation led to the decrease in the sulfur CN and to the co-
ordination shell ordering, related to a signicantly decreased
2
parameter. In agreement with the formation of dispersed MoS
2
,
the molybdenum neighbors became more distant and increased
in number. As is often observed in the EXAFS of dispersed
MoS
2
catalysts, the coordination numbers obtained for both
Mo and S were lower than the theoretical values. The presence
of the cobalt neighbor could not be inferred from the Mo K-
edge spectra of the CoMoS systems, because the heavy and
abundant molybdenum neighbor prevented the observation of a
relatively small amount of cobalt.
Overall, the Co and Mo K-edge EXAFS of the pre-catalysts
show that the thioanions preserved their chemical identity and
the molybdenum coordination remained essentially the same
as in the parent TDM. In contrast, cobalt changed its coordi-
nation from full oxygen coordination in the precursors to full
sulfur coordination in the pre-catalysts, in agreement with reac-
tions (1) and (2). A tetrahedral or a less common square-planar
coordination of cobalt is compatible with our EXAFS data. The
pre-catalysts was highly disordered, and the second metallic
neighbor was difcult to see. After suldation, the solids were
transformed to the dispersed CoMoS phase. Organics present
in the solids did not noticeably inuence the EXAFS spectra,
and probably remained outside the chemical environment of the
transition metals.
4. Conclusions
The study of unsupported or highly loaded supported sul-
des is a promising research route for developing better hy-
drotreating catalysts. Solution preparations of macroporous
and mesoporous transition-metal suldes are particularly in-
teresting, because they provide a possibility for tailor-made
preparations. By controlling precursors, solvents, and reac-
tion conditions, Ni(Co)MoS catalytic materials can be pre-
pared by structural and morphological tuning over microscopic-
and mesoscopic-length scales. The preparations used in this
work include room temperature surfactant-aided precipitations
in mixed solvents. The reactions of the MoS
4
2
and Mo
2
S
12
2
cores with nickel or cobalt salts in mixed solutions produced
amorphous solids (pre-catalysts) with a Ni(Co)/Mo ratio de-
pending on the conditions and particularly on the nature of the
thiomolybdate anion applied. Residual carbon in these solids
played an important role in stabilizing their morphology and
catalytic activity. Optimization of the promoted unsupported
NiMo and CoMo systems allows us to obtain catalysts with very
high activity in the HDS of thiophene and 4,6-DMDBT. The
EXAFS study at the Co, Ni, and Mo edges claried the coor-
dination of the transition metals in the amorphous pre-catalysts
and Ni(Co)MoS sulded phases.
Many future improvements in these systems can be envis-
aged. Although their specic activity is very high, their intrin-
sic performance is still lower than that of supported catalysts,
because many Mo atoms remain inaccessible for catalytic re-
actions. Thus, further improvement of the molybdenum disper-
sion remains possible. Thiomolybdates and ammonium sulde
are not really basic chemicals; furthermore, the amounts of
organic compounds in the solutions are relatively high, mak-
ing large-scale preparations potentially expensive. Therefore,
the solution reaction should be simplied to obtain mixed sul-
des in one step. The next challenge will be to prepare these in
aqueous solution using simple precursors, such as ammonium
molybdate or molybdic acid, commercially available cobalt
salts, and cheap and nontoxic sulfur sources, the best one be-
ing elemental sulfur.
References
[1] C. Song, Catal. Today 86 (2003) 211.
[2] C. Song, X. Ma, Appl. Catal. B 41 (2003) 207.
[3] I.V. Babich, J.A. Moulijn, Fuel 82 (2003) 617.
[4] S. Brunet, D. Mey, G. Prot, C. Bouchy, F. Diehl, Appl. Catal. A 278
(2005) 143.
[5] S. Mayo, E. Brevoord, L. Gerritsen, F. Plantenga, Hydrocarbon Process. 2
(2001) 84A.
[6] C. Olsen, L.D. Krenzke, B. Watkins, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Interna-
tional Conference on Renery Processing, AIChE 2002 Spring National
Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 1114 March, 2002, p. 305.
[7] R. Candia, O. Srensen, J. Villadsen, N.-Y. Topse, B.S. Clausen, H. Top-
se, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 93 (1984) 763.
[8] J.A.R. van Veen, E. Gerkema, A.M. van der Kraan, A. Knoester, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 22 (1987) 1684.
[9] J.A.R. van Veen, H.A. Colijn, P.A.J.M. Hendriks, A.J. van Welsenes, Fuel
Proc. Technol. 35 (1993) 137.
[10] S.M.A.M. Bouwens, M.P. van Dijk, A.M. van der Kraan, D.C. Konings-
berger, F.B.M. van Zon, V.H.J. de Beer, J.A.R. van Veen, J. Catal. 146
(1994) 375.
[11] H. Topse, B.S. Clausen, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 26 (1984) 395.
[12] R.R. Chianelli, M. Daage, M.J. Ledoux, Adv. Catal. 40 (1994) 177.
[13] R.R. Chianelli, M. Daage, J. Catal. 149 (1994) 414.
[14] G. Alonso, V. Petranovskii, M. Del Valle, J. Cruz-Reyes, A. Licea-Cla-
verie, S. Fuentes, Appl. Catal. A 197 (2000) 87.
[15] G. Alonso, M. Del Valle, J. Cruz-Reyes, A. Licea-Claverie, V. Petranovs-
kii, S. Fuentes, Catal. Lett. 52 (1998) 55.
[16] G. Berhault, L. Cota, A. Duarte, A. Mehta, R.R. Chianelli, Catal. Lett. 78
(2002) 81.
[17] Y.Y. Peng, Z.Y. Meng, C. Zhong, J. Lu, W.C. Yu, Z.P. Yang, Y.T. Qian,
J. Solid State Chem. 159 (2001) 170.
[18] Y.Y. Peng, Z.Y. Meng, C. Zhong, J. Lu, W.C. Yu, Y.B. Jia, Y.T. Qian,
Chem. Lett. (2001) 772.
[19] W.J. Li, E.W. Shi, J.M. Ko, Z.Z. Chen, H. Ogino, T. Fukuda, J. Cryst.
Growth 250 (2003) 418.
[20] E. Devers, P. Afanasiev, B. Jouguet, M. Vrinat, Catal. Lett. 82 (2002) 13.
[21] N. Rueda, R. Bacaud, M. Vrinat, J. Catal. 169 (1997) 404.
[22] P. Afanasiev, G.F. Xia, G. Berhault, B. Jouguet, M. Lacroix, Chem.
Mater. 11 (1999) 3216.
D. Genuit et al. / Journal of Catalysis 235 (2005) 302317 317
[23] I. Bezverkhyy, P. Afanasiev, M. Lacroix, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 5416.
[24] I. Bezverkhyy, P. Afanasiev, C. Geantet, M. Lacroix, J. Catal. 204 (2001)
495.
[25] I. Bezverkhyy, P. Afanasiev, M. Lacroix, J. Catal. 230 (2005) 133.
[26] Y. Ji, P. Afanasiev, M. Vrinat, W. Li, C. Li, Appl. Catal. A 257 (2004) 157.
[27] C. Coyle Lee, T.R. Halbert, W.H. Pan, M.A. Harmer, L. Wei, M.E. Leo-
nowicz, C.O.B. Dim, K.F. Miller, A.E. Bruce, S. McKenna, J.L. Corbin,
S. Wherland, E.I. Stiefel, Inorg. Chim. Acta 243 (1996) 147.
[28] J.J. Rehr, S.I. Zabinsky, R.C. Albers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 3397.
[29] K.V. Klementiev, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 (2001) 209.
[30] J.B.A.D. van Zon, D.C. Koningsberger, H.F.J. vant Blik, D.E. Sayers,
J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 5742.
[31] R. Candia, B.J. Clausen, H. Topse, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 90 (1981)
1225.
[32] J. Cruz-Reyes, M. Avalos-Borja, M.H. Faras, S. Fuentes, J. Catal. 137
(1992) 232.
[33] P. Afanasiev, I. Bezverkhyy, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 2826.
[34] R.R. Chianelli, G. Berhault, Catal. Today 53 (1999) 357.
[35] J.L. Brito, M. Ilija, P. Hernndez, Thermochim. Acta 256 (1995) 325.
[36] A. Leist, S. Stauf, S. Lken, E.W. Finckh, S. Ldtke, K.K. Unger, W. As-
senmacher, W. Mader, W. Tremel, J. Mater. Chem. 8 (1998) 241.
[37] S.J. Hibble, M.R. Feaviour, J. Mater. Chem. 11 (2001) 2607.
[38] W. Eltzner, M. Breysse, M. Lacroix, M. Vrinat, Polyhedron 5 (1986) 203.
[39] A. Mller, E. Diemann, A. Branding, F.W. Baumann, M. Breysse, M. Vri-
nat, Appl. Catal. 62 (1990) L13.
[40] M. Draganjac, E. Simhon, L.T. Chan, M. Kanatzidis, N.C. Baenziger,
D. Coucouvanis, Inorg. Chem. 21 (1982) 3321.
[41] W.H. Pan, M.A. Harmer, T.R. Halbert, E.I. Stiefel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106
(1984) 459.
[42] A.I. Hadjikyriacou, D. Coucouvanis, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2400.
[43] C. Glasson, C. Geantet, M. Lacroix, F. Labruyere, P. Dufresne, J. Ca-
tal. 212 (2002) 76.
[44] D. Nicosia, R. Prins, J. Catal. 229 (2005) 424.
[45] D. Nicosia, R. Prins, J. Catal. 231 (2005) 259.
[46] B.C. Gates, H. Topse, Polyhedron 16 (1997) 3213.
[47] T. Koltai, M. Macaud, A. Guevara, E. Schulz, M. Lemaire, R. Bacaud,
M. Vrinat, Appl. Catal. A 231 (2002) 253.
[48] V. Meille, E. Schulz, M. Lemaire, M. Vrinat, J. Catal. 170 (1997) 29.
[49] E. Lecrenay, K. Sakanishi, I. Mochida, Catal. Today 39 (1997) 13.
[50] T. Isoda, S. Nagao, X. Ma, Y. Korai, I. Mochida, Appl. Catal. A 150 (1997)
1.
[51] T. Chiranjeevi, G. Muthu Kumaran, J.K. Gupta, G. Murali Dhar, Catal.
Commun. 6 (2005) 101.
[52] M. Sun, D. Nicosia, R. Prins, Catal. Today 86 (2003) 173.
[53] Usman, T. Kubota, Y. Araki, K. Ishida, Y. Okamoto, J. Catal. 227 (2004)
523.
[54] M. Daage, R.R. Chianelli, J. Catal. 149 (1994) 414.
[55] V. Petkov, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 22 (1989) 387.
[56] C.H. Chang, S.S. Chan, J. Catal. 72 (1981) 139.
[57] J.M. Ramallo-Lopez, E.J. Lede, F.G. Requejo, J.A. Rodriguez, J.Y. Kim,
R. Rosas-Salas, J.M. Dominguez, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 20005.
[58] F.M.F. de Groot, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 67 (1994) 529.
[59] P.W. de Bont, M.J. Vissenberg, V.H.J. de Beer, J.A.R. van Veen, R.A. van
Santen, A.M. van der Kraan, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 5876.
[60] O. Kleifeld, L. Rulsek, O. Bogin, A. Frenkel
.
, Z. Havlas, Y. Burstein,
I. Sagi, Biochemistry 43 (2004) 7151.
[61] O. Proux, J.S. Micha, J.R. Regnard, A. Traverse, B. Dieny, F. Ernult,
P. Bayle-Guillemaud, J.L. Hazemann, L. Giacomoni, J. Phys. Condens.
Matter 15 (2003) 7237.
[62] S.M.A.M. Bouwens, J.A.R. van Veen, D.C. Koningsberger, V.H.J. de Beer,
R. Prins, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 123.
[63] R.G. Leliveld, J.A.J. van Dillen, J.W. Geus, D.C. Koningsberger, M. de
Boer, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 11160.
[64] V. Rajamani, C.T. Prewitt, Can. Miner. 13 (1975) 75.
[65] A. Mueller, S. Pohl, M. Dartmann, J.P. Cohen, M.J. Bennett, R.M. Kirch-
ner, Inorg. Chim. Acta 41 (1980) 259.
[66] B.S. Clausen, H. Topse, L.B. Hansen, P. Stoltze, J.K. Nrskov, Catal.
Today 21 (1994) 49.
[67] T. Shido, R. Prins, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 8426.
[68] C. Calais, N. Matsubayashi, C. Geantet, Y. Yoshimura, H. Shimada,
A. Nishijima, M. Lacroix, M. Breysse, J. Catal. 174 (1998) 130.