he publication of a complete English translation of Heinz Hartmann's essay, "Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation," inaugurates the Monograph Series of the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. This project was conceived several years ago, but its initiation has had to await the availability of a psychoanalytic work of exceptional merit and importance. The editors believe that the appropriate occasion has finally arrived. "Ich-Psychologie und Anpassungsproblem" was first presented in 1937 before the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and then published in German in 1939 in the Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und Imago. Historically it represents a turning point in the development of modern psychoanalytic theory. It is a natural sequel to Freud's previous formulations of the structural hypothesis and his contributions to ego psychology. With its appearance there began an evolution in psychoanalytic thought which continues to ramify and the full implications of which for theory and practice are not yet fully realized. To readers intimately acquainted with current psychoanalytic ego psychology, this essay will reveal the first formulations of some of its basic concepts. Many of them will have a ring of familiarity, because of the remarkable degree to which Hartmann's ideas have shaped, and become assimilated into, current psychoanalytic thinking. One becomes aware of the tremendous impact of his theories when one finds that it was in this essay that concepts such as the undifferentiated phase, the conflict-free ego sphere, conflict-free ego development, and primary and secondary autonomy were developed for the first time. Hartmann discusses the role of endowment and of the inborn ego apparatuses and their adaptive nature. The idea that ego defenses may simultaneously serve the control of instinctual drives and the adaptation to the external world finds its expression in this essay. Hartmann's concept of adaptation is in no way restricted to the "cultural" sense of the term. It is a truly inclusive conception, and he views it as an ongoing process, which has its roots in the biological structure, and with many of its manifestations reflecting the constant attempts of the ego to balance intrasystemic and intersystemic tensions. The implications of his theory for the development of perception and thought processes, the concepts of ego strength, ego weakness, and of normality, are also discussed. Neutralization, and the impact of this construct on the concept of sublimation, evolves quite naturally from this paper. One sees in this work a systematic attempt to establish within the framework of a psychoanalytic ego psychology the groundwork for a theory of human behavior in general, normal as well as abnormal. The great sweep of Hartmann's exceptionally rich intellect has made it possible for him in this task to integrate the whole field of psychoanalytic knowledge with the related fields of biology, psychology, sociology, and philosophy. The opportunity to read this essay will reintroduce psychoanalysts to a cardinal requirement of the scientific method which Dr. Hartmann's work demonstrates, namely his unswerving insistence upon precision in methodology, and upon logical consistency of theory. With it all, the rarified atmosphere of theory is flavored by a humanistic tolerance and understanding, which is discernible in his discussions of rational and irrational behavior, automatism and mechanisms of integration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
he publication of a complete English translation of Heinz Hartmann's essay, "Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation," inaugurates the Monograph Series of the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. This project was conceived several years ago, but its initiation has had to await the availability of a psychoanalytic work of exceptional merit and importance. The editors believe that the appropriate occasion has finally arrived. "Ich-Psychologie und Anpassungsproblem" was first presented in 1937 before the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and then published in German in 1939 in the Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und Imago. Historically it represents a turning point in the development of modern psychoanalytic theory. It is a natural sequel to Freud's previous formulations of the structural hypothesis and his contributions to ego psychology. With its appearance there began an evolution in psychoanalytic thought which continues to ramify and the full implications of which for theory and practice are not yet fully realized. To readers intimately acquainted with current psychoanalytic ego psychology, this essay will reveal the first formulations of some of its basic concepts. Many of them will have a ring of familiarity, because of the remarkable degree to which Hartmann's ideas have shaped, and become assimilated into, current psychoanalytic thinking. One becomes aware of the tremendous impact of his theories when one finds that it was in this essay that concepts such as the undifferentiated phase, the conflict-free ego sphere, conflict-free ego development, and primary and secondary autonomy were developed for the first time. Hartmann discusses the role of endowment and of the inborn ego apparatuses and their adaptive nature. The idea that ego defenses may simultaneously serve the control of instinctual drives and the adaptation to the external world finds its expression in this essay. Hartmann's concept of adaptation is in no way restricted to the "cultural" sense of the term. It is a truly inclusive conception, and he views it as an ongoing process, which has its roots in the biological structure, and with many of its manifestations reflecting the constant attempts of the ego to balance intrasystemic and intersystemic tensions. The implications of his theory for the development of perception and thought processes, the concepts of ego strength, ego weakness, and of normality, are also discussed. Neutralization, and the impact of this construct on the concept of sublimation, evolves quite naturally from this paper. One sees in this work a systematic attempt to establish within the framework of a psychoanalytic ego psychology the groundwork for a theory of human behavior in general, normal as well as abnormal. The great sweep of Hartmann's exceptionally rich intellect has made it possible for him in this task to integrate the whole field of psychoanalytic knowledge with the related fields of biology, psychology, sociology, and philosophy. The opportunity to read this essay will reintroduce psychoanalysts to a cardinal requirement of the scientific method which Dr. Hartmann's work demonstrates, namely his unswerving insistence upon precision in methodology, and upon logical consistency of theory. With it all, the rarified atmosphere of theory is flavored by a humanistic tolerance and understanding, which is discernible in his discussions of rational and irrational behavior, automatism and mechanisms of integration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
he publication of a complete English translation of Heinz Hartmann's essay, "Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation," inaugurates the Monograph Series of the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. This project was conceived several years ago, but its initiation has had to await the availability of a psychoanalytic work of exceptional merit and importance. The editors believe that the appropriate occasion has finally arrived. "Ich-Psychologie und Anpassungsproblem" was first presented in 1937 before the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and then published in German in 1939 in the Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und Imago. Historically it represents a turning point in the development of modern psychoanalytic theory. It is a natural sequel to Freud's previous formulations of the structural hypothesis and his contributions to ego psychology. With its appearance there began an evolution in psychoanalytic thought which continues to ramify and the full implications of which for theory and practice are not yet fully realized. To readers intimately acquainted with current psychoanalytic ego psychology, this essay will reveal the first formulations of some of its basic concepts. Many of them will have a ring of familiarity, because of the remarkable degree to which Hartmann's ideas have shaped, and become assimilated into, current psychoanalytic thinking. One becomes aware of the tremendous impact of his theories when one finds that it was in this essay that concepts such as the undifferentiated phase, the conflict-free ego sphere, conflict-free ego development, and primary and secondary autonomy were developed for the first time. Hartmann discusses the role of endowment and of the inborn ego apparatuses and their adaptive nature. The idea that ego defenses may simultaneously serve the control of instinctual drives and the adaptation to the external world finds its expression in this essay. Hartmann's concept of adaptation is in no way restricted to the "cultural" sense of the term. It is a truly inclusive conception, and he views it as an ongoing process, which has its roots in the biological structure, and with many of its manifestations reflecting the constant attempts of the ego to balance intrasystemic and intersystemic tensions. The implications of his theory for the development of perception and thought processes, the concepts of ego strength, ego weakness, and of normality, are also discussed. Neutralization, and the impact of this construct on the concept of sublimation, evolves quite naturally from this paper. One sees in this work a systematic attempt to establish within the framework of a psychoanalytic ego psychology the groundwork for a theory of human behavior in general, normal as well as abnormal. The great sweep of Hartmann's exceptionally rich intellect has made it possible for him in this task to integrate the whole field of psychoanalytic knowledge with the related fields of biology, psychology, sociology, and philosophy. The opportunity to read this essay will reintroduce psychoanalysts to a cardinal requirement of the scientific method which Dr. Hartmann's work demonstrates, namely his unswerving insistence upon precision in methodology, and upon logical consistency of theory. With it all, the rarified atmosphere of theory is flavored by a humanistic tolerance and understanding, which is discernible in his discussions of rational and irrational behavior, automatism and mechanisms of integration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
1. Challenge to encompassing religious authorities
2. French Revolution (1789) - fall of divine right of king (religious explanation) - niversal li!ert" and e#ualit"$ generated a climate of political changes in %urope (look for rationalit") &. Industrial Revolution in 'ritain in the late 18th centur" - ur!ani(ation)capitalism (*ork at factor"$ !ut not home) What is sociology? +"stematic stud" of human societies, sociolog" is the scientific stud" of interactions and relations among human !eings stud" human !ehaviour and relations !" collecting empirical evidences in a consistent *a" to esta!lish theories a!out the social *orld. +ociologists focus on things that are social -. assumption, /ndividuals can !e understood in terms of the social relations into *hich the" are !orn and from *hich the" derive meanings for their lives. 0ooking !ehind the taken-for-grantedness of our commonsense to discover the underl"ing pattern and features of social life$ a de!unking perspective Sociological Imagination C. Wright Mills:
1n a!ilit" to look !e"ond personal trou!les of individuals to see pu!lic issues operating in the large societ". (C. 2right 3ills) /n other *ords$ sociological imagination is the ability to associate and relate personal experiences to the social processes and structure of the wider world (both today and the past) (C. 2right 3ills) examine the *a"s that individuals construct the social *orld and ho* the social *orld impinge () on the lives of individuals. (0a*son and 4arrod$ 255&) most people fail to see things !e"ond their personal immediate circumstances and thus fail to reali(e that their *orst pro!lems are results of social forces instead of 6ust 7their o*n pro!lem8. ne* resources for pro!lem solving, the individual can understand his o*n experience and gauge his o*n fate onl" !" locating himself *ithin his period$ that he can kno* his o*n chances in life onl" !" !ecoming a*are of those of all individuals in his circumstances. C. 2right 3ills (1999) Auguste Comte (1!"#1"$% :rench ;evolution <. social chaos =eople suffered from >intellectual anarch"? -. no shared !eliefs a!out the *a" things ought to !e +ocial chaos could !e overcome !", having scholars speciali(ing in stud"ing societ" proposing solutions and advices as to ho* life ought to !e lived S&CI&'&() @he use of scientific methods to stud" societ", !ased on empirical evidence dra*n from o!servation$ comparison and experimentation to uncover or generate kno*ledge a!out the social *orld (science of societ"). +tud" of societ" should !e mo*ele* on the stu*y o+ the natural ,orl* through the use of scientific methods -mile .ur/heim (1"$"#1!1% +ocial life should !e studied *ith the same o!6ectivit" as scientists stud"ing the natural *orld Sociology: the scientific stud" of social facts A stud" social facts as things +ocial facts B 7manners of acting, thinking and feeling external to the individual, which are vested ()with a coercive power by virtue of which they exercise control over him8. B Cot immediatel" visi!le B Can onl" !e o!served through anal"(ing their effects $ or considering attempts that have !een made at their expressions in la*s$ religious texts and *ritten rules of conduct B Mechanical soli*arity (% =rimitive +ociet" 0o* division of la!our B +ocial solidarit" !uilt on +imilarit" in !elief and value =eople shared similar situation and experiences B Mechanical soli*arity (% =rimitive +ociet" 0o* division of la!our B +ocial solidarit" !uilt on +imilarit" in !elief and value =eople shared similar situation and experiences B &rganic soli*arity (% B 3odern societ" B Digh level of division of la!our B +ocial solidarit" !uilt on, B 3em!er?s mutual dependenc" B ;ecognition of importance other?s contri!ution in modern societ" Anomie: B @he condition of a !reak do*n in social norms governing social interactions B feeling that their dail" lives lacked meanings B pro!lem *ith social integration (attachment to societ"$ level of consensus over norms and values) B 0eason o+ anomie: ;apid change of societ" (e.g. industriali(ation) Eisruptive effects on social life Challenges to traditional lifest"les$ morals and !eliefs 2ithout providing clear values 1arl Mar2 (1"1"#1""3% 0ook at changes in societ" during /ndustrial ;evolution Duman idea and values Cot led to social change -conomic structure -.social change Ca4ital class (5ourgeoisie% - 2ith means of production (tools$ machine)
Wor/ing class (6roletariat% - 2ithout means of production - +ell their la!our to !ourgeoisie for survival B 5ourgeoisie#4roletariat relationshi4 n!alance %xploitation ( =roletariat exploited !" 'ourgeoisie) Class conflict (motor of histor") revolution B 0ise o+ ca4italism7social change 3arx, B %conomic structure 2e!er B Cultural ideas and values We8er 0ise o+ ca4italism an* 4rotestant ethic B 6rotestant ethic B %ncourage *orking hardF B Eiscourage luxur" livesF B 1ccumulative savings for future investment B 2orldl" success - a sign of personal salvation B Ca4italism B 4ro*th of rational !ehavior B ;ational -. goal oriented B /rrational-. for the sake of experience and pleasure In*i9i*ual in ca4italist society B 7increasingl" engaging in rational$ instrumental calculation that took account of e++iciency and conse#uences on the !asis of technical /no,le*ge8 B Capitalism -. gro*th of !ureaucrac" B 'ureaucrac" B Eivision of la!our B Dierarch" of authorit" B :ormal rules (4overn relationship !et*een officers and administration of officers) B %mplo"ment !ased on technical #ualification B /mpartial and impersonal B 1dministrative of thingsF (!ut not people) Controlled !" !ureaucratic organi(ation 0ost of freedom and individualism /ron cage of !ureaucrac"F :orm guidelines that direct conduct in particular situations defines *hat accepta!le and appropriate !ehaviour is in specific situations :ormal norms, *ritten do*n (e.g. la*s$ rules) /nformal norms, generall" understood (e.g. dress code) are enforced !" positive and negative sanctions (re*ards and punishments) - formal < e.g. promotion$ !onus)firing$ imprisonment - /nformal < e.g. smile$ cheers) humiliation$ !elittling social control mechanisms to maintain order in societ". ;alue !eliefs that something is good and desira!le define *hat is important$ *orth*hile and *orth striving for general guidelines for - *hat is good and desira!le - *hat is !ad$ inappropriate and undesira!le norms reflect values + @he more cherish value the more heav" sanctioned e.g. murder -. live imprisonment + @he less critical value light sanction e.g. s*earing -. teasing Social Action 4ers4ecti9e B 5asic assum4tions Do* people act depends on -. ho* people see and evaluate realit" =eople learn from others ho* to see and evaluate realit" - =eople possess a self-concept or idea of *hat sort of person the" are - @his self-concept develops in response to the reactions of others - =eople end up thinking of themselves in the same *a" as others think of them 3eanings FF =eople constantl" *ork to interpret their o*n !ehaviour and the !ehaviour of others 3eanings develop during interactions !et*een people as the" tr" to get a feel for the intentions !ehind other people?s actions. =eople construct their o*n social *orlds <unctionalism societ" - . like a !iological organism various parts -.the functioning of the *hole various tissues and organs -.the functioning of our !od" Society - made up of man" integrated parts - %ach parts has its respective function)s - a >structure? *ith ke" institutions - performing vital functions and roles directing mem!ers of societ" ho* to !ehave - /nstitutions - to meet the !asic needs or functional pre-re#uisites of societ". <ocus o+ stu*y: Do* social institutions relate to each other 1nal"(ing the functions of an institution - sho*ing the parts it pla"s in the continued existence and smooth running of societ" Con+lict 4ers4ecti9e - @ensions and conflicts !et*een groups (dominant and disadvantaged groups) - Do* po*er relationships are esta!lished - Do* relationships of control and resistance come !" and are perpetuated)continued Summary - +ocial action perspective (3/C;G), Do* people construct social *orld e.g. Do* people interpret 7thro*ing !ottles8H - :unctionalism (31C;G), Do* social institutions integrate)functions e.g. Do* police and @riads help in the smooth functioning of societ"H - Conflict perspective (31C;G), Do* different groups conflict)esta!lish po*er relations e.g. Do* police (dominant) esta!lished their po*er over @riads (dominated group)H Culture a *a" of life shared !" mem!ers of societ" - collection of ideas and ha!its - it defines accepted *a"s of !ehaving - for mem!ers to communicate and *ork together - is often taken-for-granted - is learned and transmitted from generation to generation (socialization) .ur/heim shared culture ) >consensus? over culture - necessar" for societ" culture - passed do*n from generation to generation culture - existed independent of the *ishes and choices of individuals people conformed to the culture of one?s o*n societ" to avoid negative sanctions or punishment Culture (+unctionalist 4ers4ecti9e% 6arsons +hared culture - necessar" - allo*ed people to communicate and *ork to*ards shared goals Culture passed do*n to children through - sociali(ation - %sp. primar" sociali(ation in the famil" B Culture as slo* to change B 3a6or change in culture did occur as societ" evolved Culture :unctional Contri!utes to social sta!ilit" and consensus 1llo* societ" run smoothl" 5=> ??? - :unctionalists exaggerate, - the >consensus? over culture - the extent to *hich people conform to the culture in *hich the" are sociali(ed - Cultural diversities in certain societies e.g. religion$ ethnicit" and regional diversities - 3ore applica!le to >traditional societies? rather than modern or late modern societ"H Culture (3arxist perspective) Culture (Mar2ist 4ers4ecti9e% Society as strati+ie* 8y class # Capitalist - 2orking Class Culture - ruling class ideolog" - distorted () vie* of the *orld promoted !" the dominant capitalist class Ca4italist7ruling class 4romote ;uling-class ideolog" (@usti+y the e2isting social or*er% @hrough sociali(ing agencies to internali(e !elief and values that accepted the existing social order e.g. mass media$ famil" and education s"stem 0uling#class i*eology generated Ifalse consciousnessI concealed ine#ualit"$ oppression 6ustified exploitation 5=>??? - >Cultural diversitiesIF - Gnl" capitalists and *orking classH - other dimensionsH e.g. age ("outh culture)$ ethnicit" (or race such as Chinese culture)$ sexualit" (ga" culture). - 1ll these different dimensions impl" that societies are much more diversified and that cultural development take place along different dimensions. Summary - :unctionalism, Culture-. functional$ maintaining societ" - 3arxism, Culture-. ;uling-class ideolog" (6ustif" the existing social order and domination of ruling class)