Professional Documents
Culture Documents
96 38 33-64
34
2000
Invasive Species
Specialist Group, ISSG, 2003
2005
1979
(Mochida, 1991)
2005
35
2005
30
1987
Collins and Brown (1982)
36
1.
2.
Elton2000
2000
ISSG2003
37
2000
Alien invasive species
IUCN2000
1.2.3.
4.5.6
200420062006Callaway, 2004; Wilson,
1992 Pimentel,
McNair, Janecka, Wightman, Simmonds , Connell, Wong, Russel, Zern, Aquino
and Tsomodo.(2001)
1230
2004IUCN2000
2006
38
1992
2002
2003
(United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESO, 1978)
39
(
2005)
(2005)Hegarty, Carpenter and Just1991
2006
2005
20042006
20042005
2006
40
2006
p0.807
63
65
41
1
1
ASCT
ASAT
ASBT
0.831
0.804
0.847
Likert
Likert
42
225 KR21
0.831 0.20~0.79 0.11~0.60
Alien species attitude test, ASAT
Likert
ASCT
Cronbach 0.80
Alien species behavior test, ASBT
Likert
ASCT
Cronbach 0.84
43
ASCTASAT ASBT
ASCTASATASBT
SPSS12.0 t
F pearson
ASCTASATASBT
ASCT t
2
2 ASCT t
M/SD
M/SD
M/SD
10.38/3.25
16.43/2.662
-17.236
0.000**
15.25/3.547
-10.226
0.000**
9.92/3.299
14.66/3.397
-12.001
0.000**
14.34/3.434
-12.058
0.000**
**p<0.01
44
2 ASCT
t t=-17.236p<0.01t-10.226 p<0.01t
-12.001p<0.01t-12.058 p<0.01
3 4
3 ASCT
362.590
362.590
55.585
74.508
74.508
11 . 4 2 2
815.392
125
6.523
ES
P
.000
0.52
.001*
*p0.05, **p<0.01
ASCT
M/SD M/SD
10.38/3.25
16.43/2.662
16.308
0.322
9.92/3.299
14.66/3.397
14.778
0.317
10.15
3 4 ASCT
F11.422P<0.05
ASCT 16.308
14.778
ES0.52
45
5 70
70
5 ASCT
90.6
87.9
11
63.5*
63.1*
73.4
69.7*
12
96.9
92.4
75
65.2*
13
69.8*
33.8*
81.3
72.7
14
76.6
56.1*
65.1*
75.4
15
92.2
75.8
95.3
92.4
16
73.4
69.7*
92.2
92.4
17
98.4
92.4
84.4
78.8
18
81.3
83.3
100
100
19
75
57.7*
10
82.8
63.6*
20
68.3*
49.2*
* 70
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
70 3~4
70%
6
46
6 ASCT 70%
1
2
3
4
1
2
2
3
11
13
20
(interview
S2,5,10,20070302)
(interview
S6,23,25,20070302)
(interview
S21,20070302)
(interview 26,38,20070302)
(interview
S13,20070302)
(interview
S10,18,20070302)
(interview S4,19,20070302)
(interview S 42,20070302)
(interview
S2,11,21,20070302)
(interview
S
6,20,34,20070302)
(interview S25,20070302)
(interview S3,18,20070302)
47
ASAT
t 7
7
ASAT t
M/SD
M/SD
M/SD
73.56/7.291 81.52/7.278
-9.442
0.000**
77.75/8.277
-4.634
0.000**
71.52/7.060 77.78/7.003
-5.449
0.000**
77.09/7.365
-5.007
0.000**
**p<0.01
7 ASAT
t t=-9.442p<0.01t-4.634 p<0.01t-5.449
p<0.01t-5.007 p<0.01
ASAT
8 9
8 ASAT
827.726
827.726
18.493
.000
284.651
284.651
6.360
.013*
5594.973
125
44.760
*p0.05, **p<0.01
ASAT
M/SD M/SD
73.56/7.291
71.52/7.060
72.52
81.52/7.278
77.78/7.003
81.155
78.142
0.847
0.834
48
8 9 ASAT
F6.360P<0.05
ASBT 81.155
78.142
2006
1991
2003Dimopoulos Pantis, 2003 ; Stepath, 2004
ASBT t
10
10
ASBT t
t
M/SD
M/SD
M/SD
68.25/12.008
73.75/12.159
-4.154
0.000**
72.35/11.600
-2.842
0.006**
67.17/11.124
71.80/12.887
-2.289
0.025*
70.06/13.927
-1.325
0.190
*p0.05**p<0.01
10 ASBT
t t=-4.154p<0.01t-2.842 p<0.01
t=-2.289p<0.05
49
t=-1.325p>0.05
ASBT
11 12
11 ASBT
2431.271
2431.271
17.503
.000
75.125
75.125
.541
.463
17363.066
125
138.905
12
ASBT
M/SD M/SD
68.25/12.008
73.75/12.159
73.553
1.575
67.17/11.124
71.80/12.887
70.248
1.551
67.70
11 12 ASBT
F
.541P>0.05
ASBT
73.553 70.248
2005
2003
Gaye, Hamide, Ceren and Semra2005
50
ASCTASATASBT
1
22
20
20
18
15
16
14
10
12
10
100
100
90
90
80
70
80
70
60
60
50
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
100
80
90
60
70
15
20
10
100
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
80
90
60
70
18
50
22
16
20
14
12
10
1 --- X -Y
---
Pearson 13 Pearson
13
Pearson
Pearson
P
Pearson
P
Pearson
P
.441**
.000
63
.266*
.035
63
.435**
.000
63
51
Pearson
P
Pearson
P
Pearson
P
.424**
.000
65
.031
.809
65
.314*
. 0 11
65
*p0.05**p<0.01
13
r=.441, P<.01; r=.266, P<.05 r=.435,
P<.01
r=.424, P<.01; r=.314, P<.05
r=.031, P>.05
1999Dimopoulos Pantis,2003; Hines
et al, 1986; Sandiford, 1992
14
52
14
S18
S44
S38
S13
S55
T
S42
S23
T
S37
S23
2 0 0 6 11 2 4
2 0 0 6 11 2 4
15
53
15
S15
S22
S3
2 0 0 6 11 2 4
S41
S36
S44
S51
2 0 0 6 11 2 8
16
54
16
S2
S65
S64
S24
17
55
17
T T
S15 S11
S31
S27 S21
S33 T
T S22
S19
2 0 0 6 11 2 8
S3
S13
2 0 0 6 11 2 4
-
-
18
56
18
S52
S51
S43
S47
20052006
19971999Stepath, 2004
Moseley, 2000
Stepath, 2004
57
Hines1985
1993Stepath, 2004
58
NSC
94-2511-S-152-007, NSC 95-2511-S-152 -002
59
2006
13(3)
12-14
20022006 5 3
http://www.biodiv.org/meetings/final-reports.aspx
1985
2006
5464-69
200536(7)536-541
2005
2006 8
12 http://www.etech.ncyu.edu.tw/~etechoffice/download/doc/
2005-08-12/paper2005
2000
2005
2006 8 12
http://www.etech.ncyu.edu.tw/~etechoffice/download/doc/2005-08-12/pap
er2005/
2006-
13(3)1
1993
37-44
1999
2004
2005
2006 8 12
60
http://www.etech.ncyu.edu.tw/~etechoffice/download/doc/2005-08-12/pap
er2005
2006
2003
200423(4)10-13
2003-
200438262-67
2005
50(2)159-180
1991
2005
095-010
1997
2004-
2000
423, 14-27
2005
1999
40(1)66-74
2006
-19(2),
61
1-30
(2006)
900-906
(2006)
244-250
(2006)
998-1003
2005-
2006 8 12
http://www.etech.ncyu.edu.tw/~etechoffice/download/doc/2005-08-12/
paper2005/
2000-
2001-7020-24
1987537-50
Bunzel, M., & Morris, S. (1992). Staffing and skills for multimedia production.
Mulitmedia Application Development Using DVI Technology, (pp.51-68)
New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.
Callaway, R. M. (2004). Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature. 427, 731
733.
Collins, A. & Brown, J.S. (1982). The Computer as a Tool for Learning
Through. Reflection. In H.Mandl & lesgold (Eds.). Learning issues for
Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (pp.10-18). New York: Springer.
Cornell, R., & Martin, B. (1987). The role of motivation in web-based
instruction. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp.93-100).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Dimopoulos, I. D. & John, D. P. (2003). Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding
Sea Turtles in Elementary Students on Zakynthos, Greece. The Journal of
62
63
64
Abstract
This study applied to the teaching technique with topical instruction
strategies of alien species by using the CD-ROM storybooks of alien species.
We also found a variety of species through the rich multimedia materials
inclusive of the characters, sound, pictures, animations, etc. can concrete the
concepts. It significantly helped the students to understand the alien species, the
influence of local natural environment, the superiority of alien species, and the
latter prevention and control for alien species. Besides, this study used the
quasi-experimental method to administer the teaching research. The assessing
and testing process utilized various tools, alien species cognition test, alien
species attitude test and alien species behavior test, etc. This result
indicated that the experimental-group students taught by CD-ROM storybooks
of alien species were definitely superior to the control-group students for
cognitive concepts and attitude value of alien species. However, the both groups
had no major difference in the behavioral expression for alien species. In
addition, the students seemed highly related to the cognitive ability, attitude
value and behavioral effectuation for alien species after executing the
instructional strategy with CD-ROM storybooks of alien species.
Keywords: alien species, alien invasive species, CD-ROM storybooks