Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FeCl
4
(1:1.5)
95 50 93
2 MIMB
+
PF
6
8 <1 12
3 MIMB
+
CF
3
SO
3
11 <1 15
4 DMIMB
+
FeCl
4
(1:1.5)
97 48 95
5 PyO
+
Cl
25 3 28
6 PyO
+
Cu
2
Cl
3
(1:1.5)
18 <1 20
7 PyO
+
AlCl
4
(1:1.3)
40 5 46
8 PyO
+
SnCl
5
(1:1.3)
25 3 30
9 PyO
+
FeCl
4
(1:1.3)
59 28 69
10 PyO
+
SnCl
4
(1:1.3)
1 <1 2
11 MIMO
+
FeBrCl
3
(1:1.5)
90 39 95
12 MIMO
+
AlCl
4
(1:1.5)
93 46 97
13 MIMO
+
FeCl
4
(1:1.5)
99 53 99
14 DAIM
+
FeBrCl
3
(1:1.5)
93 45 95
15 BIMBn
+
FeCl
4
(1:1.5)
99 56 99
16 BIMBn
+
CH
3
COO
40 18 53
17 PyHOH
+
FeCl
4
(1:1.5)
30 10 35
It is evident from Table 1, that the aluminates and ferrates type anions showed an excellent
performace for deep desulfurization of fuels, as was observed by other research group using
model diesels and naphtha from catalytic cracking process where mercaptants and sulfides are
virtually non existent [14, 19], however, presumably the same mechanism of extractions for sul-
fur compounds take place.
Considering that the reactivity between the sulfur organic molecules, mercaptanes and thio-
phenes, and a halogen methalate based ionic liquid with an excess of the pristine metallic salt,
is through the direct interaction of the sulfur atom with the metallic center, it is possible that a
donation-retrodonation Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson-like (1953)[28] mechanism occurs. Another
interesting observation for halogenferrate and aluminate based IL, is that the performance of
these compounds for desulfuration of fuels is highly depend on the ratio of LI containing halo-
gen as anion/MX
n
on methatesis reaction. A ratio > 1:1 is referred to as an acidic IL. It is well
known that these acidic ILs contains MX
4
and M
2
X
7
as principal anionic constituents [29, 30].
The enhanced ability of acidic IL could be related with the enables of the cations to be coor-
dinated with the sulfur atom in this case.
From Table 1 we concluded the following observations:
LI containing chloroaluminate and chloroferrate as anion are good extracting phase for
desulfuration of fuels.
The extracting phase efficiency decreased considerably when anions containing other
chlorometalates (i.e. Sn, Zn, Cu ) are used.
Anion composition play more important role than cation in the efficiency of IL as sulfur
compounds extracting.
With the same anion, imidazolium cations are the best counterpart for increasing the effi-
ciency of sulfur removing. The presence of methyl substituents in position 2, do not affect the
efficiency to removed sulfur compounds.
Acetate anion showed remarkable desulfurization ability for fuels. It anion is less efficient
than ferrates and aluminates, however, to a different of these last, IL containing acetates can be
recycled and reused without lost their performance significantly, at last in three extractive
cycles. Additionally this organic anion is halogen-free, moisture-insensitive, and air and tem-
perature stable.
Conclusions
ILs contains imidazolium cation and halogenaluminate and ferrate anions showed remark-
able efficience to remove sulfur compounds from fuels sample, however this compounds are air
and moisture sensitive ILs containing acetate as anion are a good alternative as desulfurization
agent because its shows high capacity to removed sulfur compounds and due to their stability
to air, temperature and moisture, this halogen free ILs can be easily regenerated and recycled.
References
1. Kabe, T.; Ishihara, A.; Qian, W. Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodenitrogenation: Chemistry and
Engineering. Willey-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
2. Zaczepinski, S. Exxon Diesel Oil Deep Desulfurization (DODD), in Handbook of Petroleum
Refining Processes, Chapter 8.7. Ed. R. A. Meyer, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.
3. US Pat. 1998/5730860
4. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/ulsd/uls.html
5. Europ. Pat. 1057879A2
6. Rogers, R. D.; Seddon, K. R (Eds.) Ionic Liquids as Green Solvent: Progress and Prospects. (ACS
Symposium Series), Boston, 2003.
, ,
643
7. Rogers, R. D.; Seddon, K. R (Eds.) Ionic Liquids IIIB: Fundamentals, Progress, Chalenges, and
Opportunities: Transformations and Processes (ACS Symposium Series), Boston, 2005.
8. Zhao, D.; Wu, M.; Kou, Y.; Min, E. Catal. Today 2002, 74, 157-189.
9. Vygodskii, Y.S.; Lozinskaya, E.I.; Shaplov, A.S. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 676-680.
10. Kumar, A.; Pawar, S.S. J.Org.Chem. 2004, 69,1419-1420.
11. Wilkes, J.S.; Levisky, J.A.; Wilson, R.A. Inorg.Chem. 1982, 21, 1263-1264.
12. Ito, E.; Rob, J. A.; Veen, R. V. Catal. Today 2006, 116, 446-460.
13. Brunet, S.; Mey, D.; Prot, G.; Bouchy, C.; Diehl, F. Appl. Catal. A 2005, 278, 143-172.
14. WO Pat. 02/34863 A1
15. Bsmann, A.; Datsevich, L.; Jess, A.; Lauter, A.; Schmit, C.; Wassercheid, P. Chem. Commun.
2001, 2494.
16. Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 376-379.
17. Eer, J.; Wassercheid, P.; Jess, A. Green Chem. 2004, 6, 316-322.
18. Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Conrad Zhang, Z. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 614-622.
19. Huang, C.; Chen, B.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y. Energy & Fuels 2004, 18, 1862-1864.
20. Shiraishi, Y.; Hirai, T.; Komasawa, I. Ing. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 3300.
21. Leadbeater, N.E.; Torenius, H.M.; Tye, H. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2253-2258.
22. Alexander, M.V.; Khandekar, A.C.; Samant, S.D. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical
2004, 223, 75-83.
23. Sitze, M.S.; Schreiter, E.R.; Patterson, E.V.; Freeman, R.G. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2298-2304.
24. Perry, R.L.; Jones, K.M.; Scott, W.D.; Liao, Q.; Hussey, C.L. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 1995, 40, 615-619.
25. Bonhote, P.; Dias, A.P.; Papageorgiou, N.; Kalyanasundaram, K.; Gratzel, M. Inorg. Chem. 1996,
35, 1168-1178.
26. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 3447-3452.
27. Dzyuba, S.V.; Bartsch, R.A. Chem.Commun. 2001, 1466-1467.
28. Raybaud, P.; Hafner, J.; Kresse, G.; Toulhoat, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 1481-1484.
29. Oye, H. A.; Jagtoyen, M.; Oksefjell, T.; Wilkes, J. S. Mater. Sci. Forum 1991, 183, 73-75.
30. Wilkes, J. S.; Levisky, J. A.; Wilson, R. A.; Hussey, C. L. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 1263-1264.
31. Acevedo, O.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Evanseck, J. D. J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2007, 3, 132-138.
, ,
644
Desfluorination of Alkylated Gasoline using Ionic Liquids
Olivares-Xometl O., Garcia-Chavez L., Martnez-Palou R., Likhanova N.V.
(Benemerita Universidad Autnoma de Puebla, Universidad Autnoma de Guanajuato,
Instituto Mexicano del Petrleo)
, -
. ,
.
,
.
HF .
Hydrogen fluoride is a common catalytic reagent for alkyling of gasoline; however handling
is difficult due to its toxicity and corrosive properties. For this reason, it is very important to