This document summarizes key concepts related to persons and family relations under Philippine law. It discusses the effect and application of laws, including requirements for publication and exceptions. It also covers human relations, including doctrines like abuse of right, volenti non fit injuria, and acts contra bonus mores. Additionally, it outlines concepts related to marriage under the Family Code such as requirements, effects, and exceptions. The document provides an overview of relevant statutes, cases, and legal principles.
This document summarizes key concepts related to persons and family relations under Philippine law. It discusses the effect and application of laws, including requirements for publication and exceptions. It also covers human relations, including doctrines like abuse of right, volenti non fit injuria, and acts contra bonus mores. Additionally, it outlines concepts related to marriage under the Family Code such as requirements, effects, and exceptions. The document provides an overview of relevant statutes, cases, and legal principles.
This document summarizes key concepts related to persons and family relations under Philippine law. It discusses the effect and application of laws, including requirements for publication and exceptions. It also covers human relations, including doctrines like abuse of right, volenti non fit injuria, and acts contra bonus mores. Additionally, it outlines concepts related to marriage under the Family Code such as requirements, effects, and exceptions. The document provides an overview of relevant statutes, cases, and legal principles.
Atty. Francesca l-ourdes M. Seffga I. Effect and Application of Laws (Arts. 1-18) ' Effectivity of Laws (Art. 2) 1. Publication Requirement; What to publish Importance of Publication ' Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 De Roy vs. CA 146 SCRA 757 People vs., Que Po Lay 94 Phil 640 NPC v. Pinatubo Commercial, G.R. No, 176006, 26 March 2010. fgnorance of Law excuses no one (Art. 3) 1. Mistake of law v. Mistake of Fact: a. Art. 526 -mistake on doubtful or difficult provision of law is basis for good faith - mitigates but does not extinguish liability; b. Art. 7334 - mutual error on legal effect of agreement- may vitiate consent; c. Art. 2755 - mistake in payment gives rise to right to return of erroneous payment Garcia vs. Recio G.R. No. 738322, Oct. 2, 2OO2 Prospective Application of Laws (Art. a) 1, Exception a. If provided in the law itself b, Procedural law c. Penal law if favorable to the accused d. Curative and Repealing statutes; e. Creating new rights f. Tax statutes g. Interpretative Statutes 2. Exception to the Exception a. Ex post facto laws; b. Penal laws not favorable to the accused; c. Substantive laws impairing vested rights. Valeroso v. People, G.R. No. 164815, 22 February 20OB PNB v. Office of the P-esident, G.R. No, 104528, 18 January 1996 ABS-CBN v. CTA, G.R. No. l--52306, 12 October 1981 Acts Contrary to Mandatory or Prohibitory Provisions are Void (Art. 5) 1. Exceptions a. The law makes the act valid BUT punishes THE VIOLATOR b. The law itself authorizes its validity c. The law makes the act only voidable d, The law declares the nullity of an act but recognizes its effects as legally existing waiver of nigdts (Art. 6) 1. Requisites 2. Exceptions a. Waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good customs; b. If the waiver is prejudicial to a third party with a right recognized by law. c. Alleged rights which really do not yet exist, as in the case of future inheritance d. If the right is a natural right, such as right to be supported. D,M. Consunji vs. CA, G.R. No. 137873, April 2A,200L Cui vs. Arellano University 2 SCRA 205 PNB w. Nepomuceno productions, G,R. No. 139479,27 December 2002 People v. Serzo, G.R. No. 118435, 20 June 1997 tili, Gongon v. Court of Appeals, 32 SCRA 412 ""r;, Repeal of Laws (Art. 7) rt':rfia 1. Kinds of Repeal I a. Express b. Implied (not favored) 2. Effects 3, Sec. 444, Local Government Code Navarro vs. Judge Domagtoy, 259 SCRA 129 Beso vs. Dagunan, 323 SCRA 565 Mecano v. COA, G,R. No. 103928, 11 December 1992 Judicial Decisions form part of the law of the land (Art. 8) Doctrine of stare decisis People v. Licera G.R. No. L-39990, July 2, 1975 People v, Jabinal G.R. No. L-30061, February 27, L974 Duty of Judges (Art. 9) Chuayan vs. Bernas, 34 Phil 631 People vs. Veneracion, 249 SCRA 251 Caltez, Inc, v. Palomar, 1B SCRA 247 People v, Licera, 65 SCRA 270 : Doubtful Statues (Art. 1O) People vs. Purisima, 86 SCRA 542 In Re: Padilla, 74 Phtl. 377 Customs (Art. 11-12) 1. Requisites to make a custom an obligatory rule a. Plurality or repetitron of acts; ) t, b. Practiced by the great mass of the social group; c. Continued practice for a long period of time; d. The community accepts it as a proper way of acting, such that it is considered as obligatory upon all Martinez vs. Van Buskirk, 1B Phil 79 Yao Kee vs, Sy-Gonzales, 167 SCRA 736 In the Matter of the Petition for Authority to Continue the Use of the Firm Name Ozaeta, Romulo, etc.,92 SCRA 1 Computation of Period and Time (Art. 13) 1. Rule on Computation of Period: First day excluded, last day included a. Years- 365 days, unless year identified b. Months-30 days, unless month identified c. Days - 24 hours d. Nights - sunset to sundown 2. Exception: Computation of age - each year based on birth anniversary 3. Polic! if last day is a Sunday or Legal Holiday Garcia vs. Recio, 366 SCRA 437 CiR vs. Primetown, G.R. 162155, August 28, 2007 Penal Laws (Art. 14) a) Applicability in the Philippines if committed here b) Territoriality c) Exceptions 1. Public International Law (Diplomatic Immunity, etc) 2. Treaty Stipulations Civil Laws (Art. 15-17) General Rule: Nationality Principle a. Family Rights and Duties ,,i, d) Status ,'i;:1 e j Condition :li I f) Legal Capacity ,, 2, Exceptions 3. Property transactions (real or personal) - lex situs, 4. Exception to Exception: National Law of Decedent 5. Order of successional rights 6. Amt of successional rights 7. Intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions B. Capacity to succeed 9. Art. 26, par. 2 FC 10. Lex Loci Celebrationis i. Exception: Intrinsic validity and Art. 26, par. L FC 3. Renvoi Doctrine Miciano vs. Brimo 50 Phil 867 Van Dorn vs. Ronillo, Jr. et al., 139 SCRA 139 Pilapil vs. Ibay-Somera 1.74 SCRA 653 Barreto vs, Gonzales 58 ,Phil 67 Govt, vs. Frank, 13 Phil 238 Barnuevo vs. Fuster, 29 Phil 605 Testate Estate of Bohanan vs. Bohanan, et al., 106 Phil 997 Bellis vs. Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 Aznar vs. Garcia 7 SCRA 95 Roehr vs. Rodriguez, G.R, No. 142820, June 20,2003 Garcia vs. Recio G.R. No. 138322, Oct.2,2002 People v. Lol-lo and Saraw, G.R. No. 17958, 27 February L922 Eugenio v. Velez, G.R. No. 85140, 17 May 1900 Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera/ G.R. No. 80116, 30 June 1989 Van Dorn v. Romillo, G.R. No. L-68470, B October 1985 Republic v. Iyoy, G.R. No. t52577,21 September 2005 Republic v. Obrec[do, G.R. No. 154380, 5 October 2005 Roehr v. Rodriguez, G.R. No. !42820, 20 June 2003 Art. 18 Suppletory application of Civil Code in matters governed by special law II. Human Relations (19-36) Art. 19-21 Doctrine of Abuse of Right Requisites Doctrine of Volenti non fit Injuria Damnum Absque Injuria Acts Contra Bonus Mores Req uisites Ereach of Promise to Marry Development Bahk of the Phils. Vs. CA, 449 SCRA 57 Uypitching vs. Quiamco, 510 SCRA 172 Wassmer vs. Velez, 12 SCRA 648 Nikko Hotel Manila Garden, et all vs. Reyes G.R. No. L54259, Feb.28,2OQ5 Gashem Shookat Baksh vs, CA, 219 SCRA 115 Pe vs, Pe, 5 SCRA 200 Spouses Quisumbing vs. MERALCO, G.R. No, 142943 April 3, 2002 Globe Mackay Cable vs. CA, 176 SCRA 778 University of the East vs. Jader, G.R. No. 732344, Feb 7, 2000 Aznar v. Citibank, G.R. No. L64273, 28 March 2008 Heirs of Nala v. Cabansag, G,R. No, 164273,28 March 2008 Carpio v, Valmonte, G.R, No, 151866, 9 September 2004 rr_i..--& c_-iatrnan+ f iAri ))l 1. Accion in rem verso Villalva vs. RCBC Savings Bank ll ,, ,i, Respect for Other's Privacy, Personality, Etc. (Art. 26) Tenchavez vs. Escano, 15 SCRA 355 St Louis Realty vs. CA, 133 SCRA 179 Independent Civil Actions 1. Breach of Constitutional and Other Rights - Art. 32 2. Defamation, Fraud, Physical Injuries - Art. 33 3, Refusal or failure of city ot municipal police to render protection - Art.34 4. Quasi Delict or Culpa Aquilana - Art. 2176t 2177 Prejudicial Question (Art. 35) 1. General Rule: Criminal Case takes precedence 2. Exception: Sec. 1, Rule 111, Rules of Court 3. Application to civil, criminal, administrative cases Ching vs. CA, 331 SCRA 16 Te vs. CA,346 SCRA 327 Mercado vs. Tan, 337 SCRA 122 Morigo vs. People, G.R. No. 145226. February 06,2004 Spouses Yu vs. PCIB, G.R. No. 747902, 17 March 2006 Donato vs. Luna, G.R. No. 53642, April 15, 19BB III. Persons (Art. 37-SL) 1. Juridical Capacity vs. Capacity to Act a. Restrictions/Limitations and Modifications on Capacity to Act 2. Natural'Persons a. .peginning and End of Personality i. When child considered born rj b. Theory of General Capacities 3, R.A. 6809 4. Juridical Persons ' a. How Created/ Terminated b. Theory of Special Capacities 5. Rules on Survivorship , i 6. Domicile vs. Residence .l Republic Act No. 6809 Quimiguing vs. Icao, G.R. No. L-26795, )uly 3L,797A Geluz vs. CA, G.R. No. L-L6439, July 20, 1961 De Jesus v. Syquia, 58 Phil. 866 l Limjuco vs. Estate of Pedro Fragante Dumlao vs, Quality Plastics, G,R, No. L-27956, April30, L976 Mo Ya Lim Yao vs. CID, 41 SCRA 292 Frivaldo vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 120295, June 28, !996 Romualdez-Marcos vs. COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 THE FAMILY CODE IV. Marriage 1. Definition (Art. 1) a. Special Contract vs. Ordina'ry Contract 2. Requirements (Art. 2-6) , a. Essential l i. Legal Capacity 1, Sex 2. Age a. 18-21 requires parental consent: voidable if none b. 2t-25 parental advice: valid if none but issuance of marriage license suspended for 3 months i. Effect if license issued before 3 months - mere irreg u la rity 3, Absence of Impediments (Art.35(4),36-38,52-53) ii. Consent b. Formal c. Effects i. Absence of Essential or Formal: Void 1. Exception: Art. 35(2) ' ii. Defective Essential: Voidable iii. Irregular Formal: Valid but persons liable punished civilly, criminally or administratively 1. Exception: Voidable if no consent from parents, either or both of contracting parties at 1B or above but below 21 3, Authority of solemnizing officer (Art 7) a, Persons authorized b. Exception: Either' or both parties in good faith, person unauthorized to solemnize marriage Art. 35(2) 4. Valid Marriages License a. Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 20 b. Marriages Exempt from Marriage License (Art. 27-34) i. No Good faith exception c. When either or both parties are foreign citizens, Stateless persons or refugees (Art,2,1) Ninal vs, Bayadog, G.R. No. t33778, March 14t 2000 5. Marriage Ceremony a, No particular ferm prescribed b. Mirfirnum requirements: r, i. Appear before Solemnizing officer 1. Proxy Marriage ii. Declaration that they take each other as husband and wife iii. Presence of at least 2 witnesses of legal age 1. Absence merely an irregularity 6. Non-Essential/Non-Formal Requirements a, Marriage Certificate - best evidence b. Venue of Marriage (Art. B) i. Directory, not affect validity of marriage 7. Foreign Marriage a, General Rule: Where one or both parties to the marriage are citizens of the Philippines, the foreign marriage is valid in this country if solemnized in accordance with the laws of the country of celebration b. Exceptions: i. contracted by a national who is below 1B years of age ii. bigamous or polygamous (except as provided in Art' 41, FC) iii, contracted through mistake of one party as to the identity of the other I iv, ::lti?.!"g _lollo_*,nn the annulment or declaration of nullity of a previous marriage but before partition v. void due to psychological incapacity vi. incestuous vii. void for reasons of public policy c, Divorce (Art. 26(2)) i. Requisites 1. Valid marriage between Filipino citizen and foreigner 2. Valid divorce obtained by alien spouse capacitatirrg hlm/her to remarry Garcia v. Receio, G.R. No. 138922, Oct. 2-, 2002 Rep, vs. Cipriano Obrecido III, GR No. 154380, Oct.5,2005 Edgar San Luis v. Felicidad Sagalongos, G,R. No. 134029, February 6,2007 :Pilapilvs,Somera,174ScRA653':.:.''i 'EdgarSanLuisVS,SanLuis,G.R'No.133743,Feb6i'2007:] Republic vs. Iyoy, 470 SCRA 508 [:?:i15 ff ."f,':? i';tK,scRA 1 14 Void M:rri:go 1. Where any party is below 18, even with consent of parents/guardians (Art. 35(1)) 2, Absence of authority of person who solemnized the marriage (Art. 35(2)) a. Exception: Any or both of parties in good faith 3. Absence of Marriage License a, Exceptions: Art 27-34 4. Bigamous or Polygamous (Art. 35(4)) a. Presumptive Death (Art. a1) i, Effect of Reappearance of Absent Spouse 5, Mistake in (Physical) Identity (Art. 35(5)) 6. Void Subsequent Marriage a. Without judicial declaration of nullity of previous voirl marriage (Art. 40) b. Without judicial declaration of presumptive death of absent spouse (Art. 41) c, Where the absent spouse was presumed dead, and both the present spouse and would-be spouse were in bad faith in contracting marriage (Art. 44) d. Failure to record in the civil negistry and registry of property the judgment of annulment or of absolute nullity of the marriage, partition and distribution of the property of the spouses and the delivery of the children's presumptlve legitimes (Arts. 52-53) e. Effect of Termination of Subsequent Marriage (Art. 43) i. Children of the subsequent marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be considered legitimate; ii. Dissolution & liquidation of the absolute community or conjugal partnership. If either sporise acted in bad faith, his share in the net , profits shall be forfeited: , 1. In favor of the common children; 2. If none, in favor of the childrerr of the gLrilty spotts6r by prevlous marriage; or 3, In default of children, in favor of the innocent spouse; iii. Donations by reason of marriage remain valid except if the donee contracted the marriage in bad faith; iv. The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the spouse in bad faitlr as the beneficiary in any insurance policy; and v. The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith shall be disqualified to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate or intestate succession 7. Psychological Incapacity a. Elements b. Molina Doctrine B. Incestuous (Art. 37) a. Between ascendants and descendants of any degree b. Between brothers and sisters whether of the full or half blood 9. Void for Reasons of Public Policy a. Cbllateral blood relatives whether legitimate or illegitimate up to the 4th civil deg ree b. Step-parents & step children c, Parents-in-law & children-in-law cJ, The adopting parent & the adopted child e. The surviving spouse of the adopting parent & the adopted child f. The surviving spouse of the adopted child & the adopter g. Adopted child & a legitimate child of the adopter h, Adopted children of the same adopter i' Parties where one, with the intention to marry the other, killed the latter,s spouse/ or his/her spouse, i' There is no need for conviction in a criminal case of the guilty party, The fact of killing committed by one of the parties to the marriage can be proved in a civil case Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA, GR No. 119190, Jan. L6, L997 Carating-Siayngco v. Siayngco, G.R. No. 158896 Oct 27t 2OO4 Republic v. Molina G.R. No. 108763, February L3, 1997 Marcos v. Marcos (GR. NO. 136490, October 19, 2OOO Noel Buenaventura v. CA, et al., GR No. 727358, March 31, 2005 Bobis vs Bobis GR. No. 138509, July 31, 2OOO Lucio Morlgo vs. People, GR No. 745226, Feb. 6,2004 Gomez v. Lipana, GR. No. L-23ZL4| June sot L97O Ninal vs. Bayadog, G.R. No. 133778, March L4,2OO Villanueva vs. CA, 5O5 SCRA 564 Santos vs. CA, 24O SCRA 20 Republic vs. CA, 268 SCRA 198 Lucita Hernandez vs. CA, G.R. No. 126010, Dec. 8, 1999 Dedel vs. CA, 421 SCRA 461 Lam vs. Chua, 426 SCRA 29 Mallion vs. Alcantara, G.R. No. 141528, October 3, 2OO6 Carating-Siayngo vs. Siayngo, 44L SCRA 422 Navarro vs, Cecilio-Navarro, G.R. No. L62O49, April L3t 2OO7 Antonio vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 155880, March 10, 2006 Republic vs. Quintero-Hamano, 428 SCRA 735 Landicho vs. Relova, 22 SCRA 731 Donato vs, Luna, 160 SCRA 441 Wegel vs. Sempio-Dy, 143 SCRA 499 Domingo vs. CA, 226 SCR'A 572 Beltran vs. People, G.R. No. 137567, June 20,2OOO Mercado vs. Tan, G.R. No. I3TtLOt August 1, 2OOO Republic vs. Nolasco, G.R. No. 94O53, March 17, L993 Armas vs. Calisterio, G.R. No. 136467, April6, 2OOO Manuel vs. People,476 SCRA 461 Morigo vs. People, 422 SCRA 376 Tenebro vs. CA, 423 SCR.A272 Carino v. Carino ('351 SCRA 127) Ty v. CA (346 SCBA 86) Voidable Marriage 1, Grounds: Must exist at time of Marriage (Art, 45) a. 1B or over but below 21 without consent of parents or guardian b. Either party unsound mind c. Consent obtained by Fraud i. Nin-clisclosure of previous conviction by final judgment - crime involving moral turpitude ii. Wife Concealed pregnancy by another at time of marriage iii. Concealment of STD existing at time of marriage iv. Concealment of drug addiction, habitual alcoholism or homosexuality or lesbianism at time of marriage d. Consent obtained by force, intimidation or undue influence e. Either physically incapable of consummating marriage, incapacity continues and appears to be incurable i. Doctrine of Triennial Cohabitation f . Either party afflicted with serious STD which appears to be incurable 2. Persons who may file action for annulment, Period for filing a. Parents/Guardian who did not give consent before party reaches 21 b. Party within 5 years from majority unless freely cohabited c. Durirrg the lifetime, either party or any relative or person having legal charge d. Within 5 years from discovery by injured party unless thereafter freely cohabited e. Within 5 years after force, intimidation or undue influence ceased by the injured party unless thereafter freely cohabited f. Injured party within 5 years from marriage for STD and or incapacity to consummate marriage 3. Role of Prosecuting Attorney/ Public Prosecutor 4. Effect of Termination of Marriage a. Children i. Status ii. Custody iii. Suppoft (Spouse, child) 'J. ;ffi:[i'1"":uleg itime vi, Liquidation of Community of property vii. Testate or Intestate Succession viii, Insurance Folicy ix. Donation Propter Nuptias Sarao vs. Guevarra, G.R. No. 47063, 40 OG 263 (CA) Bucat vs. Bucat, 72 Phil t9 Aquino vs. Delizo, 109 Phil 21 Tuason vs. CA, G,R. No. 716607, April 10, 1996 Corpus vs, Orchotorena, 453 SCRA 447 Cervantes vs. Fajardo, G,R. No. 79965, January 27, t9B9 Republic vs. Iyoy, 470 SCRA 508 Espiritu vs. CA, 242 SCRA 362 Mangonon vs. CA,494 SCRA 1 Anaya vs. Palaroan, GR. No. L-2793O, November 26, L97O Legal Separation 1. Grounds (Art. 55) a. Effects of Filing Petition b. Cooling-off Period (Art. 58) 2. Grounds for Denial of Petition (Art. 56) 3. Period for filing (Art. 57) 4. Effects of Decree of Legal Separation 5. Effects of Reconciliation Francisco vs. Tayao, 50 Phil 42 Gaudionco vs. Hqn. Penaranda , L-72984, November 27, L9B7 Ong vs. Ong, 505 SCRA 76 Republic vs. Iyoy, 470 SCRA 508 Gines vs. Bugayong, 100 Phil 616 Lapuz-Sy vs. Eufemio, 43 SCRA t77 Cervantes vs, Fajardo, G.R.No.79965, January 27, t9B9 Espiritu vs. CA, G.R. No. 115640, March 11;, 1995 Obligations Between Husband and W, 1. Live Together 2. Mutual Love, Respect, and Fidel,ty 3. Mutual Help and Support Goitia vs. Campos-Rueda, 35 Phil 252 Arroya vs. Vasquez, 42 Phil 54 Property Relations Between Husb;i,''d and Wife I 1. Marriage Settlement a. Requisites b. Modifications: Must be nacje before marriage i. Exception: Juclr ial S,,laratiorr of Property During Marriage (Art. 76) 2. Absence of Marriage Settlemc nt, Ji irt Administration (Art. 96, Art. t24(t)) a. General Rule: Property' ia ,on governed by Phil Laws (Art. B0) b. Exception: i. Both spouses ali sn5 ii. As to extrinsic ualidit,., of Contracts 1, Not sii i)ted ;r rJ executed in the Philippines 2. Situatr ,; in ,e foreign country but not executed in the philippir es iii. Contrary Stipur 31iep,, ryA'!+L+riiis4*t:+4F11;+*+irp.}{*l rr!-clDE,,pt; {.,.t)g9I eglne[][r,FUqDaf.lo,q a, Wife : relief from courts within Sft5r6?riim=ffi65'ffiffi Incapacity of spouse or cannot provide for joint administratiorr 4, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Administration (Art. 96, L24(2)) Transfer of Administration (Art, t4Z) Administration vs. Acts of Ownership Management of Household Failure to Comply with Obligation (Art_ 101, 128) Donations By Reason of Marriage - Assunrptiop of Sole '.lr a. Requisites b. Distinguished from ordinary donation 10, Donation Between Spouses during the marriage 11. Grounds for Revocation Valdez vs. Court of Appeals, 266 SCRA 324 Agapay vs. Palang, 276 SCRA 341 Harding vs. Comercial Union Assurance, 38 phul 464 Rondriguez vs. Rondriguez Arcaba vs. Vda. De Batocael, G.R. No. 146683, November 22, 2OOt Property Relations Governed By 1. Marriage Settlement 2. By provisions of the Code 3. By Local Customs Absolute Community of Property 1. General Rule: consist of all property owned by the spouses at the time of the marriage or acquired thereafter (Art. 91) 2. Exceptions a. property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage b. property for personal and exclusive use except jewelry c. property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title, except when the donor, testator or grantor expressly provides otherwise (Art:'92) 3. Administration and Disposition 4. Rule on Game of Chance 5. Remedies of Present Spouse in case of Abandonment 6, Charges upon and Obligations 7. Liquidation (Art. 102) B. Grounds for Termination (Art. !'t) BA Finance Corporation, 151 SCRA 608 Marmount Resort Hotel Ent vs. Guiang, 168 SCRA 373 PNB vs, CA, 153 SCRA 435 Dela Cruz vs. Dela Cruz, 130 Phil 324 Conjugal Partnership of Gains 1. Properties under Conjugal Perrtnership of Gains 2. Exclusive Property of Each Spouse (Art. 109) 3. Rule in case of Improvement of ilxclusive Proeprty a. Accession b, Reverse Accession 4. Charges Upon and Obligations 5, Liquidation Metrobank, et al. v. Tan, GR No. L637L2, November 3O, 2OO6 Rodriguez v. De la Cruz,8 Phil. 665 Pefayo v. CA, GR No L4L323 June 81 2005 Homeowners and Savings Loan Bank vs. CA,GR No 153802' March t"t,zOOs Security Bank v. Mar Tierra Corp., GR No. L43382, November 29' 2O06 Villanueva vs. CA, 427 SCRA 439 Villanueva vs. IAC, 192 SCRA 21 Tan vs. CA,273 SCRA 228 t: BPI vs. Posadasr 56 Phil 215 Jocson vs. CA, 17O SCRA 333 Maramba vs. Lozano, 2O SCRA 474 Magalon vs. Montejo, L46 SCRA 282 In Re: Estate of Narciso Padilla, 74 Phil377 , Wong vs. IAC, 200 SCRA 792 Carandang vs. Heirs of Quirino De Guzman, 508 SCRA 469 Lilius vs. MRR, 62 Phil 56 Go vs. Yamane, G.R. No. L6O762t May 3, 2006 Jovellano vs. CA, 21O SCRA 126 Castillo vs. Pasco, 11 SCRA 1O2 Ayala Investment and Development Corp vs. CA, February L7, L998 Ching vs. CA,423 SCRA 357 Homeowners Savings & Loan Bank vs. Dallo, 453 SCRA 283 Lacson vs. Diaz, 14 SCRA 183 People vs. Lagrimas, 29 SCRA 153 Jose Uy vs. CA, G.R. No. LO9557t November 2,2OOO Thelma Jader-Manalo vs. Sps. Camaisa, G.R. No. L47978, January 23t 2OO2 Sps. Antonio vs. CA, G.R. No. L25t72, June 26, 1998 Separation of Property 1. Marriage Settlement (Art. 134) 2. Judicial Order a. Causes b. Effects Union Without Marriage 1. Art. L47 and 148 a. Applicability b. Salaries and Wages c. Prgperty Acquired Exclusively By other Party d. Property Acquired by Both ' e. Presumption Valdez vs. CA, 260 SCRA 221 Susan Nicdao Carino vs. Susan Yee Carino, G.R. No. 132529, February 2,2OOI Buenaventura vs. CA, 454 SCRA 261 Gonzales vs. Gonzales,478 SCRA 327 Agapay v. Palang, GR No. 116668, July 28, 7997 Manila Surety & Fidelity Co., Inc. vs, Teodoro, 20 SCRA 463 Juaniza vs. Jose, 89 SCRA 306 Belcodero vs. CA, 227 SCRA 303 Francisco vs. Master Iron Works & Construction Corp. 451 SCRA 494 Atienza vs. De Castro, 508 SCRA 593 Joaquino vs. Reyes, 434 SCRA 260 Tumlos vs. Fernandez, GR NO. 137650, April L2t 2OOO Abing v. Waeyan, GR No L46294t July 31, 2006 The FamilY r 1. Family Relation 2, Mandatory Prior Recourse to Compromise (Art. 151, NCC) a. Exceptions 3. Family Home ' a. General Rule: Exempt from executions b. Exceptions Gayon vs. Gayon, 36 SCRA 104 Olaco vs. Co Cho Chit, 22O SCRA 656 Manacop vs. CA, 277 SCR'A57 Modequillo vs. Brevo, 185 SCRA 766 Gomez vs. Sta. Ines, 473 SCRA 25 Patricio vs. Dario lII, 5O7 SCRA 438 Versola vs. CA, 497 SCRA 38S Taneo vs. CA, G.R. No. LO532, March g, Lg99 Legitimate Children 1, General Rule: Conceived or born during a valid marriage 2. Exceptions a. Artificial Insemination b. Born of voidable marriage before decree of annulment c. Conceived or born before judgment of nullity under Art. 36 has become final and executory d, Conceived or born of Subsequent marriage under Art. 53 e. Conceived or born of mothers who might have declared against legitirnacy or sentenced as adultress f . Legally adopted g. Legitimated 3. Rules on Impugning Legitimacy a. Generally instituted only by husband b, Prescriptive period c. Exception: Heirs may file 1. Husband dies before period expires (have the remainder) 2. Posthumous birth (full period) 3. Continue case instituted by husband d. Grounds 4. Actions to claim Legitimate/ Illegitimate Status a. Who can claim b. Proof of Filiation 5. Adoption a. Domestic Adoption Act b. inter-country Adoption SSS vs. Aguas,4B3 SCRA 383 Benitez-Badua vs. CA, G.R. No. 105625, January 24, Igg4 Macadangdang vs. CA, 100 SCRA 73 Babiera vs. Catotal, G.R. No. 138493, June 15, 2000 Tison vs. CA, 276 SCRA 582 Mariategui vs. CA, 205 SCRA 337 Reyes vs. CA, 135 SCRA 439 Jison vs. CA, G.R. No. 124853, February 24, IggB Mendoza vs. CA, 201 SCRA 675 Marcelo Lee vs. CA, G.R. No. 118387, October 7,2OOI Liyao, Jr. vs. Tnahati Liyao, G.R. No. 138961, March 7,2OOz Eceta vs. Eceta, 428 SCRA 783 Rodriguez vs. Lim, 508 SCRA 113 Verceles vs, Posada, G.R, No. 159785, April 27, 2OO7 Angeles vs. Maglaya, 469 SCRA 363 Agustin vs. CA, 460 SCRA 315 Herrera vs. Alba, 493 SCRA 197 Mendoza vs. CA, 201 SCRA 675 Tayag vs. CA, 209 SCRA 664 In the Matter of rAdoption of Stephanie, 454 SCRA 541 Landingin vs. Republic,493 SCRA 383 Support 1. Basis: Financial Capacity of Giver, Needs of Recipient a' Not based on parental authority, hence hoes not terminate with emancipation 2. Coverage a. Substance b, Dwelling c. Clothing d. Medical Attendance e. Education f. Transportation a. Legal b. Judicial c. Conventional ' 4, Characteristics a. Personal b. In transmissible : c. Not subject to waiver or compensation d. Exempt from attachment or execution e. Reciprocal f. Provisional Character of Support Judgment g. Mandatory 5. Persons Obliged to Support each other (Art. 195) 6. order of Liability if several Persons obtiged to give Support (Art. 199) 7. Magnonon vs. CA, 494 SCRA 1 Zaguirre vs. Castillo, 456 SCRA 520 Dadivas de Villanueva vs. Villanueva, 54 phil g3 Quintana vs. Lerma, 24 Phil2B5 Mendoza vs. Parungao, 41 Phil 27I Francisco vs. Znadueta, 61 phil 7Sz Quimiguing vs. Icao, 34 SCRA 132 Advincula vs. Advincula, 10 SCRA 109 Jocson vs. Empire Insurance Co. 103 phil 580 Baltazar vs. Serafino 14 SCRA 820 De Marcaida vs. Redferin, 49 Phil 849 Parental Authority 1, General Rule: Exercised Jointly 2. Exceptions: a. Judicial Order to the Contrary b. Illegitimate Chitd c. Parental Preference Rule d. Rule in case of Legal Separation 3. Persons exercising Substitute parental Authority (Art. 216) 4. Persons exercising Special Parental Authority (Art. 218) 5. Kinds of Properties of a Minor , a. Adventitious b. Profectitious 6. Grounds for Suspension of parental Authority a, Emancipation b. Death c. Adoption d. Appointment of another as general guardian e. Judicial Declaration of Abandonment f . Final Judgment Divesting parental Authority i. Excessive harshness ii. Corrupting orders iii. Compelling child to beg iv, Rape .i V. Acts of lasciviousness vi. Judicial declaration of incapacity g. Permanent/ Temporary Santos vs. CA, 242 SCRA 407 Sagala-Eslao vs. CA,266 SCRA 317 Vancil vs. Belmes, G.R. No. 132223, June 19, 2001 Espiritu vs. CA, 242 SCRA 362 Medina vs, Makabali, 27 SCRA 502 Cervantes vs, Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575 David vs, CA, 250 SCRA 82 Luna vs, IAC,737 SCRA 7 Pablo vs. Gualberto, 46I SCRA 450 Tan vs. Andre, 450 SCRA 145 Briones vs. Miguel, 440 SCRA 455 St. Mary's ncaOemy ur. Wiif iurGrpitanos, G,R. No, 143363, February 6, 2OO2 Emancipation and Age of Majority 1, Reaching 1B years of Age 2. RA 6809 Change of First Name or Nickname 1. RA 9048 2. Grounds Republic v. CA, GR NO. 979O6t May 21, L992 Surname 1. Reason for interest of State a. Prevent confusion of identity b. Prevent use of name for illegal purposes 2. Legal Name - What appears in Birth Certificate 3. Change - Rule 1O3, Rules of Court a. Court Approval b. Grounds i. Ridiculous, Dishonorable ii. Extreme Difficultt to Pronounce iii. Adoption of Filipino name to remove traces of alienage iv. Legal cause - adoption, etc 4. Rules on what to use a. Legitimate or legitimated children b. Illegitimate children c. Adopted child d. Married women i, May retain maiden name t' 1. May not do so if has been using husband's surname for a long time e. Marriage Annulled i. Wife guilty ii. Wife Innocent f. Legal Separation g. Death of Husband h. Persons with same names i. Usurpation of another's name Citizenship and Domicile 1. Distrinction 2, Elements of Domicile 3. Kinds of Domicile 4. Requirements for Acquisiton of New Domicile t' Funerals 1. Duty and right to make arnangement about funerals is in accordance with right and Duty to support under Article 1gg, FC 2. the funeral shall be in keeping with the social position of the deceased 3. the funeral shall be in accordance with the expressed wishes of the deceased i. in the absence of the expressed wishes, his religious beliefs or affiliation shall determine ii. in case of doubt, the persons in Article 199, Fc shall decide 5. any person who disrespects the dead or allows the same shall be liable for damages if the deceased is married, the tombstone or mausoleum is deemed a part of the funeral expense and chargeable against the community or conjugal partnership property Absence 1. Provisional Abesence 2. Declaration of Absence 3. Presumption of Death 4. Reappearance of absentee a, Effec[ on subsequent marriage of spouse present b, Effect on Properties lt ! I i I