QFD: House of Quality

Project:
Revision:
Date:
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Customer
Requirements (Explicit
and Implicit)
1 | | | | | | | | | | 20% 20 9 3 4 3 1
2 1% 1 9 5 3 3 2
3 | | | | | 10% 10 9 2 4 4 3
4 | | | | | | 12% 12 9 3 5 4 4
5 | | 5% 5 9 4 3 4 5
6 1% 1 9 3 4 2 6
7 | | | | | 10% 10 9 3 4 2 7
8 | | | | | 10% 10 9 5 5 4 8
9 1% 1 9 2 4 2 9
10 | | | | | | 12% 12 9 4 4 3 10
11 | | | | | 10% 10 9 3 5 3 11
12 | | 4% 4 9 4 4 3 12
13 | | 4% 4 9 5 4 3 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
D
i s
p
o
n
i b
i l i d
a
d

d
e

R
e
p
u
e
s
t
o
s
+
+
+
+
+
+
V
i b
r
a
c
i o
n
e
s
13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
A
n
c
l a
j e
P
r
o
t
e
c
c
i
n

E
l
c
t
r
i c
a
D
o
s
i f
i c
a
c
i
n

c
a
r
n
e
A
c
e
s
o
r
a
m
i e
n
t
o

T

c
n
i c
o
11 12
Operabilidad
Durabilidad
Silencioso
Produccin
Costo
Consumo Energtico
Desmontaje
D
i m
e
n
s
i o
n
e
s
P
e
s
o
R
o
b
u
s
t
e
z
T
o
l e
r
a
n
c
i a
s

d
e

M
o
n
t
a
j e
L
u
b
r
i c
a
c
i
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
o
s

d
e

F
a
b
r
i c
a
c
i
n
M
a
t
e
r
i a
l e
s
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
d
e

F
u
n
c
i o
n
a
m
i e
n
t
o
N

m
e
r
o

d
e

P
i e
z
a
s

Tamao
Hignico
Transportable
Seguro
Mantenimiento

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
I
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
W
e
i
g
h
t
R
o
w
#
W
e
i
g
h
t
C
h
a
r
t
Direction of Improvement
Column #
T
a
r
g
e
t

f
o
r

F
u
n
c
t
i o
n
a
l
R
e
q
u
i r
e
m
e
n
t

#
1
T
a
r
g
e
t

f
o
r

F
u
n
c
t
i o
n
a
l
R
e
q
u
i r
e
m
e
n
t

#
2
T
a
r
g
e
t

f
o
r

F
u
n
c
t
i o
n
a
l
R
e
q
u
i r
e
m
e
n
t

#
3
1

2 3

Ambiental
222
14 15 16

150 66 191 73 160 125 98 332 51 24 198 169 183 374
8%
| | |
|| | |
| || || | | | | |
|
6% 3% 7% 8% 15% 9% 8% 3% 7% 5% 4% 14% 2%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
| | |
|
0 4 5
Technical Importance Rating
Target
Max Relationship 9 9
14 15 16 Column #
Weight Chart
Relative Weight
4 2
8 9 10 11 12 13
| | | |

Maximize
Target
Minimize
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Correlations
Positive +
Negative
No Correlation
Direction of Improvement
Relationships
Strong
Moderate
Weak
5
R
o
w
#
3
1 2 3 4



O
u
r

P
r
o
d
u
c
t



C
o
m
p
e
t
i t
o
r

#
1
:
T
o
r
r
e
y



C
o
m
p
e
t
i t
o
r

#
2
:
S
u
p
e
r
C
h
a
c
o
n
0
9 9 9 3
| | |
| | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
1%
3 5 1
1 5 4
5 2 1
Template Revision: 0.9 Date: 4/23/2010
Christopher Battles
T
e
c
h
n
i c
a
l
C
o
m
p
e
t
i t
i v
e

A
s
s
e
s
m
e
n
t
Customer Competitive Assesment
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
3
2
1
0
Competitor #1: Product Name
Competitor #2: Product Name
Competitor #3: Product Name
Competitor #4: Product Name
5
4
1
2
3
4
5
Our Product
Our Product
Competitor #1
Competitor #2
Competitor #3
Competitor #4
Our Product
Competitor #1
Competitor #2
Competitor #3
Competitor #4