Drawing from image-elicited depth interviews, we investigate whether consumers pursue the consumption of authentic objects with specific personal goals in mind. We find that consumers are motivated to focus on those particular cues in objects that for them convey authenticity (what is genuine, real, and/or true) and that this decision-making process is driven by a desire to draw different identity benefits (control, connection, virtue) from authentic objects. Our interpretive analysis elab- orates contributions to theorizing related to consumer agency in seeking authentic consumption experience. We provide cultural explanations for the desire to assert the authentic self in these particular ways.
Drawing from image-elicited depth interviews, we investigate whether consumers pursue the consumption of authentic objects with specific personal goals in mind. We find that consumers are motivated to focus on those particular cues in objects that for them convey authenticity (what is genuine, real, and/or true) and that this decision-making process is driven by a desire to draw different identity benefits (control, connection, virtue) from authentic objects. Our interpretive analysis elab- orates contributions to theorizing related to consumer agency in seeking authentic consumption experience. We provide cultural explanations for the desire to assert the authentic self in these particular ways.
Drawing from image-elicited depth interviews, we investigate whether consumers pursue the consumption of authentic objects with specific personal goals in mind. We find that consumers are motivated to focus on those particular cues in objects that for them convey authenticity (what is genuine, real, and/or true) and that this decision-making process is driven by a desire to draw different identity benefits (control, connection, virtue) from authentic objects. Our interpretive analysis elab- orates contributions to theorizing related to consumer agency in seeking authentic consumption experience. We provide cultural explanations for the desire to assert the authentic self in these particular ways.
2009 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc. Vol. 36 February 2010
All rights reserved. 0093-5301/2010/3605-0011$10.00. DOI: 10.1086/615047 The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes MICHAEL B. BEVERLAND FRANCIS J. FARRELLY* Drawing from image-elicited depth interviews, we investigate whether consumers pursue the consumption of authentic objects with specic personal goals in mind. We nd that consumers are motivated to focus on those particular cues in objects that for them convey authenticity (what is genuine, real, and/or true) and that this decision-making process is driven by a desire to draw different identity benets (control, connection, virtue) from authentic objects. Our interpretive analysis elab- orates contributions to theorizing related to consumer agency in seeking authentic consumption experience. We provide cultural explanations for the desire to assert the authentic self in these particular ways. T he nature of authenticity in consumption is contested. Researchers explain authenticity as original and staged (MacCannell 1973), fabricated (Belk and Costa 1998), iconic, indexical, and hypothetical (Grayson and Martinec 2004), self- referential hyperauthenticity (Rose and Wood 2005), symbolic (Culler 1981), existential (Wang 1999), literal or objective (Beverland, Lindgreen, and Vink 2008), legitimate (Kates 2004), sincere (Beverland 2006), approximate and moral (Leigh, Peters, and Shelton 2006), and emergent (Cohen 1988). Differences also emerge as to the nature of the objects (or cues) that can convey authenticity. For example, authen- ticity has been identied in the patently fake (Brown 2001), obvious reproductions (Bruner 1994), and mundane mass- market objects (Miller 2008), while others consider such ex- amples the very antithesis of authenticity (Eco 1986). What can account for such difference in conceptualizations, objects, and cues? Our ndings help to explain this diversity by demonstrating that the process of authenticating an object *Michael B. Beverland is professor of marketing, School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, GPOBox 2476V, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia (michael.beverland@rmit.edu.au; m.beverland@bath.ac.uk). Francis Farrelly is associate professor of marketing, Department of Marketing, Monash University, Cauleld East, VIC 3145, Australia (francis.farrelly@ buseco.monash.edu.au). The authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order. We thank Kay Laochumanvanit for technical assistance and the Australian Research Council (ARC-DP0985178) for nancial support. Thanks also to Tandy Chalmers, Carla Taines, Kelly Tian, the editors, and three reviewers for feedback on earlier versions of this article. John Deighton served as editor and Eric Arnould served as associate editor for this article. Electronically published August 19, 2009 or experience is contingent on the consumers goals. In doing so, we extend previous research identifying the relationship between goals and authenticating acts (self-referential be- haviors that reveal or produce the true self; Arnould and Price 2000, 8), a focus on sincerity of intent in dening an authentic member of a subculture (Belk and Costa 1998; Leigh et al. 2006), the relationship between shifting com- munity goals and the nature of brand authenticity (Kates 2004), and the active information processing strategies em- ployed to nd authenticity in the less likely of objects such as reality television (Rose and Wood 2005) and ctional tour- ist sites (Grayson and Martinec 2004). Rose and Wood (2005) note that much may be gleaned by better understanding how personal predilections shape the way authenticity is con- structed. To this end we seek to account for what constitutes authenticity by examining how goals underpin assessments of authenticity including the purposive strategies employed by consumers to achieve this assessment. This article has the following structure. First, we provide support for the relationship between consumer goals and authenticity through a brief review of the relevant litera- ture. Second, we outline the interpretive methods em- ployed to address our research objectives. Third, we pre- sent our ndings and identify three goals underpinning self-relevant assessments of authenticity (control, connec- tion, and virtue). We also provide a sociocultural account for these ndings and identify four strategies employed by consumers when conferring authenticity to an object. We conclude the article with a discussion of theoretical con- tributions and suggestions for future research. THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 839 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND: AUTHENTICITY AND CONSUMER GOALS The notion that assessments of authenticity in objects are underpinned by consumer goals is based on the notion that consumers actively seek authenticity to nd meaning in their lives, and in line with associated personal goals (self-rele- vant objectives people pursue in their daily lives; Emmons 2005) prefer brands and experiences that reinforce their de- sired identity (or identities). Arnould and Price (2000) offer insight into why such goals have become a critical part of the authentication process. They establish that the loss of traditional sources of meaning and self-identity associated with postmodern market characteristics (caused by global- ization, deterritorialization, and hyperreality) has encour- aged consumers to become active and adept in appropriating authenticity. Often described in terms of a search or quest, the desire for authenticity is also said to be a response to standardization and homogenization in the marketplace (Thompson, Rindeisch, and Arsel 2006). Arnould and Price (2000) identify two means of appropriating authen- ticity to achieve self-authentication. The rst is where the consumer cocreates product value or a consumption expe- rience as part of self-authentication (an authenticating act). The second, described as authoritative performance, is a cultural display (such as rituals, festivals, or protest actions) representative of a social unit (e.g., family, afnity group, profession, and ethnic group) and what the consumer deems are important aspects of life. Common to both is that the consumer is purposeful in linking the object or experience to stories of the self. There is widespread agreement that authenticity is a so- cially constructed interpretation of the essence of what is observed rather than properties inherent in an object (Bev- erland 2006; Beverland et al. 2008; Grayson and Martinec 2004; Rose and Wood 2005; Thompson et al. 2006). Con- sistent with goal-driven behavior, the essence of what is observed can represent who one desires to be (Cohen 1988; Culler 1981; Ferrara 1988; Postrel 2003), a personal point of view (Wang 1999), knowledge and expectations (Belk and Costa 1998; Holt 1998) including a persons need to match the object with their idea of howit should be (Grayson and Martinec 2004), and belief systems and stereotypes (Bruner 1994; Rose and Wood 2005). The link between goals and authenticity is also evident across the literature on subcultures of consumption and brand communities with respect to the consumers purposeful efforts to participate and gain status (such as consuming the right brand or engaging in legitimate behavior; Kates 2004; Leigh et al. 2006; Quester, Beverland, and Farrelly 2006). Bruner (1994) and numerous others (Arnould and Price 2000; Chronis and Hampton 2008; Leigh et al. 2006; Postrel 2003; Rose and Wood 2005; Wang 1999) have pointed out that the meaning given to authenticity is context and goal dependent. Different interpretations of authenticity are often a by-product of the personal goals that inuence which prop- erties of a context are uniquely identied as signicant and relevant. In the case of the New Salem site Bruner discusses, some visitors gave preferential treatment to nostalgia for a simpler bygone era. For others authenticity was conferred if the site catalyzed ideas around progress. The goals that distinguish the curator from the merchandise seller, the fam- ily, or the teacher who brings students to the site for edu- cational purposes underpin different interpretations of what is authentic. It has also been demonstrated that the conferring of au- thenticity to an object involves conscious negotiation or production of meaning, including the active use of brand cues. For example, Beverland et al. (2008) consider the relationship between different levels of goals (from situa- tional to identity based) and the degree to which consumers actively scrutinize brand materials. When confronted with the need to make quick decisions about the authenticity of a class of beer, for example, consumers reduce claims to a few veriable indexical cues (see also Chronis and Hampton 2008). When seeking long-term identity goals such as sup- porting local communities, consumers drew on a broader range of cues to actively construct a sense of authenticity that reinforced their desired sense of self. Leigh et al.s (2006) study of the MG brand community identies the creative use of cues among community members when as- sessing the authenticity of members. In this case, community members overlook breaches of indexicality (such as modern adaptations to historic sports cars and the use of nonstandard or original parts) and focus on cues that signal the sincerity of the owners efforts to maintain public awareness of the brand. Two recent studies demonstrate how consumers actively nd authenticity in seemingly fake or contrived objects. Rose and Wood (2005) reveal how consumers actively negotiate the paradox between the subjectively real and the contrived or fantastic to nd authenticity in reality television. Under- pinning our view that goals inuence assessments of authen- ticity is the observation that Rose and Woods (2005) infor- mants were as likely to value the contrived elements of reality television shows as the connections to personal reality because both facilitated purposeful efforts to establish authenticity. Grayson and Martinec (2004) establish that consumers pur- posefully blend fact and ction to authenticate objects such as the so-called historical residence of a ctional character Sherlock Holmes. In doing so, these consumers actively con- struct authenticity because they are motivated to realize as- sociated benets, such as a sense of escape (from the pho- niness associated with modern life), feelings of assuredness (based on perceived evidence that what one believes in is real), and connection with the past (cf. Rose and Wood 2005). Signicantly, despite the multiplicity of terms and inter- pretations applied to authenticity, ultimately what is consistent across the literature is that authenticity encapsulates what is genuine, real, and/or true (Arnould and Price 2000; Bendix 1992; Berger 1973; Costa and Bamossy 1995; Thompson et al. 2006). And, as others have highlighted, consumers do not nd authenticity in the fake but rather are able to nd elements 840 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH TABLE 1 INFORMANT DETAILS Informant Age Family status Educational background Profession Andrew 31 Single Trade certicate Credit controller Anita 27 Married High school Accounts Bernard 39 Single High school Upholsterer Caroline 54 Single Postgraduate High school teacher John 37 Single Trade certicate Truck driver Judy 51 Married High school Customer service Kate 46 Married Undergraduate Administrator Louise 30 Single Postgraduate Human resources manager Mario 30 Married High school Business owner Meg 32 Married Postgraduate Financial analyst Michael 55 Married Postgraduate Retiree Nick 28 Single Postgraduate Accountant Phil 40 Married Undergraduate Surveyor Renee 23 Single High school Customer service support Ross 60 Married Postgraduate Managing director Rowena 33 Single High school Temping Sandra 37 Married High school Hospitality worker Scott 33 Single Postgraduate Channel manager Tony 53 Married Undergraduate Plant supervisor William 61 Single Postgraduate Chemical engineer Zoe 38 Single High school Sales assistant of what is genuine, real, or true in consumption experiences or objects that others may deem to be altogether unreal or false (Grayson and Martinec 2004; Rose and Wood 2005). What needs to be better understood is how these different interpretations come into being, and it is here that much is to be gained from an exploration of the nature and role of personal goals and their cultural underpinnings. METHODS As we are working within the meaning-based tradition of research, we adopted an interpretative approach. Both authors conducted all interviews, which were held in the informants homes. Our primary data were derived from semistructured depth interviews with 21 informants (see table 1 for details). We used a recruitment agency to locate informants, and we instructed the agency to provide a diverse sample in terms of age, gender, income, and educational background in order to gain a rich range of experiences and insights into views of authenticity. Long interviews allowed access to consum- ers rsthand personal experiences and meanings associated with authenticity and inauthenticity. To facilitate articulation of unconscious meanings and motivations, we asked infor- mants to have at hand possessions, pictures, or memorabilia reective of important experiences and favored (hated) ob- jects. To stimulate further discussion, we developed a le of around 100 images, including pictures of day-to-day life, tourist sites, historic gures/events and artifacts, local and foreign brands (new and old versions where relevant), and cultural icons such as sporting paraphernalia. The choice of items was informed by the literature on authenticity. These images were made available to informants at the interview after they had discussed their own objects. These techniques were particularly useful in facilitating informants to artic- ulate their views of authenticity (cf. Belk, Ger, and Aske- gaard 2003). The authors asked a mix of grand tour questions and oating prompts (McCracken 1988). At the beginning of the interview, informants were asked to think about the general meaning of authenticity to them. Since the infor- mants would often approach this question with personal stories or experiences, further prompts were used to under- stand the signicance of such events. Following a general discussion of authenticity and authentic experiences, we fo- cused on commercial objects, including brands and events. Informants were asked to discuss three brands they thought were authentic and three they considered inauthentic. In- formants selected these from their own experience or from the image le discussed earlier. The informants sometimes struggled initially to dene authenticity, and they often en- riched, rened, and in some cases altered their view during the interview in a spirit of joint discovery and critical re- exivity. This enrichment occurred because of the availability of prompts and the noninvasive nature of the interviewing and because informants relaxed as they told their stories. Although the interviews were broad and only semistructured, informants were asked to elaborate on various statements they made; provide more explanation for the experiences, objects, people, advertisements and brands they referred to; and elab- orate on the personal relevance of the subject matter. Given this method, informants spoke for virtually the entire period, with the researchers only engaging in oating prompts (fol- lowing the initial grand tour question), asking for clarication on certain terms and every so often summarizing informant responses or views. Interviews lasted on average 2 hours, THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 841 FIGURE 1 AUTHENTICATING OBJECTS, BRANDS, AND EXPERIENCES (OBE) although several lasted considerably longer. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, resulting in over 2,200 pages of text. Both authors analyzed the transcripts. We rst read the transcripts and conducted our own interpretation before meeting to discuss the ndings in more detail. Our initial classication involved establishing the links between life stories and judgments of authenticity and whether these transferred to objects. In our close readings of the textual data, we noted that participants comments suggested ben- ets, standards, and motivations and that these factors un- derpinned their attraction to cues conveying an objects authenticity. At this point, theoretical categories were elab- orated on during open and axial coding procedures. We then began a process of dialectical tacking, moving back and forward between our ndings and the relevant liter- ature to deepen our understanding of the nature of au- thenticity and the processes by which consumers assess objects and the underlying goals involved (cf. Spiggle 1994). As a nal step, we interviewed one more informant to further explore situations where consumers dealt with conict between different goals. VALUED IDENTITY BENEFITS OF SELF- AUTHENTICATION: FEELINGS OF CONTROL, CONNECTION, AND VIRTUE Our ndings highlight the inseparable link between de- terminations of authenticity and informant personal goals (i.e., the desire for self-authentication), as well as the critical need to look beyond assessment of the object to more fully appreciate the meaning of authenticity (Rose and Wood 2005). A summary of the ndings is provided in gure 1. When conferring authenticity to commercial objects such as experiences, brands, and events, our informants realized pos- itive identity benets in the form of a favorable character- ization of the true self. Three distinct personally relevant benets (also referred to herein as goals) were evident across our cases (table 2 provides summary details): control, con- nection, and virtue (each desired benet reected wider so- ciocultural norms). Importantly, whether in the case of brands, objects, or experiences, these identity benets were a reection of the interpretation of what was considered genuine, real, and/or true. Informants were also active in applying standards and information-processing strategies to cues when assessing authenticity. Feeling in Control The rst account of authenticity related to agency and the desire of informants to achieve mastery over their environ- ment (see also Leigh et al. 2006). In this sense, control is an end-state (whereby consumers seek to be in control; Richins 2005) rather than a process. Hochschild (1983) ob- served airline cabin crew sometimes engaging in small rule- breaking actions to regain a sense of control over their work. Importantly, Hochschilds research identied that these workers were seeking control in order to reafrm their iden- tity as professional skilled individuals (i.e., such actions were driven by a desire to reafrm work role authenticity). Extending this line of research, a number of informant pas- sages associated authenticity with feeling a sense of personal 842 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH control over their surroundings and life in general. For ex- ample: Interviewer: Your picture of surng. Thats authentic? Phil: Surng has taught me lots of things like persistence because it takes ages and because it is up to you to keep improving all the time for yourself. No coaches, as you say, you might go with your mates but once you are out there it is just you, and I like it like that because . . . you rely on your abilities. And that lesson and experience is the most authentic thing of all that you carry with you. And it is good, you know, in knowing what you are about and making choices even with surf brandsI mean why buy Quiksilver or Volcom or Ripcurl just because it is the brand of today that supposedly carries the cool factor, buy it because you reckon its good for you, maybe because it helps to be better in the water. This says something about you that is real and as I say I use this outside of surng too in my work and that is absolutely real to me anyway. Like several of our informants Phil merged his notion of what was real (including surng experiences and buying brands and products) with a conception of self associated with self-improvement and self-reliance through personal achievement and informed choices. Achievement in surng requires persistent effort and dedication. Although one can receive coaching and guidance, mastery of the activity is self-determined. As well, standing alone in surng is au- thentic because it provides lessons for success in other ac- tivities such as business decisions and consumption choices. Phil rejects social inuences such as fashion or peer pres- sure, preferring to select brands that help him achieve per- sonal mastery. For Phil, these brand choices represent an authenticating act (Arnould and Price 2000). Just as Phil identies authenticity through the application of qualities unique to the individual (knowledge, experience and skill), Tony associates authenticity with deliberate choices, careful analysis, and realistic expectations. For ex- ample: Tony: First of all authenticity is not a mistake . . . authen- ticity is a checking process. Interviewer: Checking process? Tony: I mean to determine whether something is authentic or not you need to be able to test the system. Interviewer: And anything else? Tony: Realistic I suppose is authentic. Interviewer: What do you mean by realistic? Tony: Its a realistic achievement, a realistic goal . . . a vision as something that I have that I aspire to, that I know that I can get. Interviewer: Right. Tony: Im getting towards the end of my working life where I have managed to be able to achieve and accumulate like wealth, possessions, and that becomes a part of the history of my life, which becomes authentic. So that sort of covers everything, my home, my car. Interviewer: So why are they authentic? Tony: Because its a realistic achievement. Its things that you could turn round and say, because I studied and I was diligent I was able to achieve these things. I mean, I dont know, almost a shrine to your life. Tony draws a connection between sustained effort over many years and the authenticity of his objects. Like Phil, Tony transfers the lessons gained from a character-forming activity (in this case engineering), where personal applica- tion was central to success, to other aspects of life, including consumption choices (see his passage on ING below). For example, just as an engineer achieves mastery over nature and materials through the careful application of theory to reality and an understanding of tolerances, so Tony appre- ciates the need to set realistic goals in other life events. As a result, Tony plays a central role in shaping events for his benet. Objects, such as his house and car, are the physical manifestation of his mastery over his environment. The mastery evident in Phils and Tonys passages was also central in other accounts of consumptionas noted in table 2. Rowena, for example, desires the genuine article in order to retain control over her health. Michael views an Apple computer as authentic because it empowers him and others to engage in tasks they could not normally manage. Apple (selected over other computers because Michael views this brand as being rst to market with a mass-market, easy- to-use computer) thus allows Michael to achieve mastery over events. William also desires to retain control over his con- sumption decisions by refusing to accept marketer claims at face value. Instead, claims that are relevant to the offer (in this case the relationship between country-of-origin, quality perceptions, and price) are subjected to further examination. Overall, when consumers seek to be in control, they desire personal sovereignty (the exclusive right to control oneself) over consumption choices and prefer objects and experi- ences that help realize associated benets. For example, Megs desire for control over her diabetes forces her to review mandatory ingredient labeling on food products, which in turn results in increased mental and physical effort on her behalf (one-and-a-half hour shopping trips) and in the choice of brands like Yoplait that she knows from per- sonal experience have no physical side effects. Consistent with this desire for independent judgment and empower- ment, the informants focused on performance claims when assessing the authenticity of a brand. In cases where func- tional claims could only be experienced through use, brands were judged authentic only after personal experience of the reputed benets (i.e., value in use). For example: Interviewer: What do you mean cynical? Tony: Well, I tend to get cynical about advertising and brands. When you turn around and say authentic brands, generally I would say a product thats not built by huge massive ad- THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 843 vertising dollars. Its advertised by showing me exactly what the product does. Interviewer: Right. Tony: This sort of might indicate what Im saying. On my computer I switch it on and I get that ING will give me 5.25% interest. But its not telling me that, you know, Im a smarter person for going to ING. You know what I mean? Its stark. Its clear. Its not giving me any other reason to invest my money in them than the fact that I get 5.25%. Interviewer: And you can prove it? Tony: Yes, thats right. I can just go up to the Commonwealth Bank and say, okay, how much are you going to give me? Meg reports: Id say theyre [brands] authentic in terms of what theyre trying to promote, so . . . if the shampoo says it will ease frizz control in your hair and it does, then okay its achieved my objective in purchasing it. If it doesnt, then I wont buy it again. So I think its the proof in the pudding. You can tell it does this and this, whiz bang, lights, cameras, and action, but until I try the product Ill never know that. So I think it needs to be very honest in terms of what it can deliver. In each passage above, informants related authenticity to functional performance benets and thus desired factual in- formation because it enabled them to make informed de- cisions. The ING brand has particular value to Tony because the espoused claims, rather than being advertising puffery, provide him with information critical to establishing the truth as to what is the best brand. The brand focuses on what matters in relation to bankinginterest rates. Meg also desires information that conveys just the core benet of the brand. However, unlike interest rates, the performance benets of Megs shampoo must be experienced directly. Thus, Meg prefers marketers to make realistic claims that address practical problems (frizz control) that she can con- rm through experience. Feeling Connected A second account of authenticity discussed by our infor- mants related to a feeling of being connected to important others, to community, place, culture, or to society in general. Key benets associated with feeling connected were an ide- alization of community, personal enrichment through being part of something, and being proximate to like-minded oth- ersconsistent with the desire to develop an authentic self as an active member of the community. These informant accounts expressed a distinct preference for brands that rep- resented a means to experience connection. Central to this account of authenticity was a strong preference for proximity to place, people, and culture because such activities repre- sented a higher idealthat of valuing fellowship within a community. For example: Scott: I was in Egypt and I had a guide who was local . . . so the authenticity of the tour feels something a bit different than if you had an Australian trying to take that tour. Interviewer: So what creates that authentic feeling, do you think? Scott: I think its the knowledge of the person. For example, I could have the knowledge of Egypt but Im not Egyptian, so I think its the culture and understanding and feeling of being Egyptian that would give it the authenticity of traveling through the pyramids . . . the authenticity in, I suppose, a travel perspective is that youre enveloped by the experience, meaning that you do not feel like youre three or four degrees of separation, in a way youre with that one other person, so you only feel like youre two degrees away. So getting the authentic feel of being wherever you are . . . it is enriched to a point where you feel like youre part of it, you dont feel that far away from it. And it narrows the gap between me and somebody who has lived there all their lives. Throughout his interview, Scott states his desire to be personally enriched by connection to place and to have lo- cals reect back to him what it means to be part of a par- ticular society. Central to Scotts account of his travels is his preference for proximity to local people. For example, while Scott was touring Egypt, having a local guide relay the nature of place to him enabled him to come the closest that he could to understanding what it really means to be Egyptian. In their accounts of connection, informants repeatedly men- tioned places, events, community, and tradition as part of their identity. For example (see table 2), being part of the local cycling community and participating in a fund-raising ride (Around the Bay in a Day) is real for Nick because it connects him with like-minded others. This desire to be part of some- thing with like-minded others is what Relph (1976) refers to as existential insidedness, where individuals relate to a place or a community event as though they are inside it. By engaging in this relatively grueling ride, Nick, who is an experienced cyclist and part of the St. Kilda, Melbourne, cycling fraternity (I do maybe three days per week. I live in St. Kilda, so theres a fairly big cycling culture down there. I go before work, about 5:30. Theres large groups, so its a fairly social sport) reinforces his desired self as someone who plays a part in the community. This ideali- zation of community and participation in communal life (as a means of ensuring continuity) is identied in Zoes passage below: Zoe: There is a surf school and ongoing events like small local surf competitions and get-togethers and that is very real for me. Funnily enough, there is talk that one of the local surf shops outlets wants to sponsor it, which is good because they see the need to keep it going too. It is really important, and it says a lot about people in the area and how surng brings people together . . . who might not know each other but all want to be there for the same reasons. It is a great way for the kids to learn a great outdoor sport but just to experience life in a community and getting together with the TABLE 2 ELEMENTS OF INFORMANTS AUTHENTICITY GOALS Goal Denition Informant exemplars Control Mastery of self and environment Interviewer: So what does a brand need to be authentic? Rowena: A name you would know and trust like Yoplait yoghurt. Interviewer: What is it about Yoplait? Is authenticity important when buying something? Rowena: Its important to me, particularly foodwise because Ive got diabetes, so Ive got to be careful with what I eat. Michael : Apple computer. Interviewer: How is that authentic? Michael : That authenticates the ability to retain and develop our knowledge. So it gives us a greater view of the world. Its been able to allow us to achieve things that we would never have been able to achieve. The reach for the stars, if you like. Interviewer: So authentic includes things humans cannot do by ourselves? Michael : Not so much cant do by ourselves but certainly cant do as quickly. More accu- rately as well, of course. William: When you see something and they say its authentic most people look with skepticism, whereas I look at it to say, why are they saying it? Like Swiss watches. The Swiss watch industry gained reputation for being the most accurate, but now you can buy Swiss watches which werent made in Switzerland. Interviewer: Okay. William: But theyre trying to use the Swiss name to get that image and genuineness. Connection Relating to others, culture, time and place, and community Nick: On Sunday, I was in an event Around the Bay in a Day. That was a great experi- ence because the objective of it is to raise funds for the Smith Family so its a good cause as well. It was very well run, although we had to wait for a ferry for 2 hours. . . . That was the only downer but you cant expect anything more than that. . . . There were about 9,000 people that did it, so its quite a big event. . . . It is authentic because the people that are there are there because they want to be there. . . . It is the whole event because theres so many people doing it and youre passing people, youre riding with people, talking with people the whole way, and its just a whole day experience. . . . At the end you sit around and talk to people and you tell stories or whatever. Interviewer: How does it t to authenticity? Nick: Well as I said everyones there because they want to be there and they feel right into it, if you know what I mean. It feels right because people are there because they want to be, not because theyre supposed to be or theyre putting on a front. . . . Theres a feeling of realness. Interviewer: Any brands in particular? John: Benson and Hedges, Wineld, Marlboro. Interviewer: Why? John: Theyre legendary cigarette manufacturers. You see them all around the world in advertising. Theyve become very much inauthentic at the moment because obviously for health reasons, theyre not able to market their products like they used to be able to so therefore people stop taking notice of these companies. Interviewer: Because of what they did? John: No, I dont think its because of what they did. See, theres no place for their products. Interviewer: So what part of the brand has become inauthentic? John: The advertising of it. Interviewer: Why? John: Because the companies are not allowed to advertise as much anymore so people arent as aware of these products as much because its not in their face all of the time. Interviewer: Okay, so something that is authentic has to be popular and recognized more? John: Yes, denitely, otherwise it loses its image, loses its authenticity. Virtue Being true to a set of moral values Caroline: I think it springs from selessness. Like if you dont think about yourself all the time and you act authentically you are looking outwards rather than inwards. You are not doing things for your own sake or your own self. Interviewer: How is that authentic? Caroline: For me authentic behavior is behavior that is worthwhile and moral and honest. . . . Nike have been implicated in some pretty awful things and child labor and making shoes at low cost and then selling them for an exorbitant price, so I would think that they are an inauthentic brand. THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 845 TABLE 2 (Continued) Goal Denition Informant exemplars Interviewer: What is it about Nike? Renee: I put them in an inauthentic category just because although they became the market leader and did a lot of creative stuff, I think that theyve exploited their reputa- tion in the meanwhile by general employment practices. Interviewer: Employment practices? Renee: Theyve made a lot of money partly because theyre authentic but at the same time they are paying low wages and they do a lot of exploitation as well. Interviewer: What is it? Judy: Its the Barbie doll. Interviewer: Its the Barbie doll, yes. Judy: Yes, because its promoting certain values through what it is. Interviewer: So that values make it inauthentic? Judy: They promote a kind of an ideal of how girls should look. Interviewer: So whats the consequence of that? Judy: Because hardly any girls look like that. . . . The Cabbage Patch dolls are better because they look real, they look like real babies, and some of them are ugly and some have dark skin and some have no hair. other parents and kids and pitching in to make sure something like this runs. One of the guys made a big barbecue trolley that we wheel around, and it might be a small thing but, you know, it is often the centerpiece after all the surng is done, and people gather around it . . . someone else might have brought some music and all are welcome. And the little things like that make these things a community and that is important for us here and why it is a great place to live. Interviewer: So things that contribute to the community are authentic? Zoe: Yes. For several of our informants, important local events rep- resented an authoritative performance (Arnould and Price 2000) in the way they enabled characterization of a self that sought to celebrate and sustain community. In Zoes pas- sage, the surf school and local surf events fostered shared values. Her mention of pitching in (whether this involved sponsorship, providing music, or the barbecue trolley) sym- bolizes the importance given to unity and having as a com- mon objective the desire to connect (with members of the community) and the positive socialization of the children. Adding weight to the power of these events as authoritative performances is their widespread support as evidenced by how long they have been in existence, growth in partici- pation, and the wider involvement of institutions such as the local school and surf shop. The valuing of connection to place and community was also reected in purchase behavior. Louise recounted her desire to buy something that reminded her of her time spent in London. A common ritual among young Australians is the Big OE or overseas experience whereby people spend time following high school or university working and trav- eling overseas (for historical reasons London is the desti- nation of choice). At the end of her stay in London, Louise sought an item that would connect her back to place and her memories of friends made there. For example: Louise: I bought a bracelet that was very authentic. Interviewer: So what was it about that bracelet? Louise: I was in London and I went down to my favorite market, which is Portobello Road, and I really wanted to buy something that reminded meI was about to leave London, Id been living there for about 5 yearsand I wanted to buy something that reminded me of my experience in London, and I didnt want anything too materialistic, I wanted some- thing special. So I went to the market, and I bought three rose gold charms, and I knew that by buying those it would be something that Id wear all the time and it would remind me of London. When seeking an object that connected her back to her time in London, Louise deliberately chose to go to the mar- kets at Portobello Roada favorite among Londoners. Rather than selecting an object that Australians might as- sociate with Englishness (i.e., typical tourist items), Lou- ise selects something that reects her almost insider status (i.e., her two degrees of separation). This object connects her back to a place and time she values and would signal to other expatriates and Londoners insider knowledge, po- tentially allowing her to form connections with them. The value attached to being a part of a community was also reected in informants accounts of brands and au- thenticity. Johns passage in table 2, for example, reects the relationship between being accepted by the mainstream and authenticity. Offering an unusual take on the legitimacy of cigarette brands, John evaluates them as historic icons that are now no longer viewed as authentic. Critically, this loss of status is not due to the health risks associated with cigarettes but to consensus in the community that the ad- vertising of such products should be banned. As a result, these brands are no longer real because they do not play a visible part in community affairs as they did when they were sponsors of major sporting events. It is the case that changes in societal attitudes toward smoking have seen this activity 846 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH move from the mainstream to the periphery, with the result that cigarette brands no longer dene individuals (it was common among smokers to identify with advertisements celebrating the Marlboro man or the Alpine woman) or provide the basis for connection. Nicks selection of the cycling brand Campagnolo reects this valuing of contribution to community. For example, he reports: Campagnolo is more traditional. I think its going back to the grass roots of cycling. Whereas Shimano make shing rod reels and all that sort of stuff; so you get the feeling that Campagnolo are completely focused on what theyre doing for cycling and that makes them a little bit more authentic. . . . I always relate the general sense to a feeling you get, its just people talking about them [Campagnolo] more than anything else. Ive never used them before but I assume theyre better. For Nick the Campagnolo brand is run by passionate cyclists (like him) who dedicate themselves to producing quality products that benet the sport. This brand is valuable because it provides him with a means to indirectly connect to a living tradition of cycling (i.e., the grass roots). The importance Nick attaches to this view is further revealed by the fact that, although he has never used the brand, other cyclists constantly talk about it as the quality leader, which lends it subcultural legitimacy (cf. Kates 2004) and therefore authenticity. This valuing of brands as conduits for con- nection was central to many informant accounts. For ex- ample: Interviewer: How about the Simpsons? (Picture prompt.) Rowena: Its big, worldwide. Interviewer: Big? Rowena: I can identify it you know. Im on that couch at 6 oclock at night watching the reruns of The Simpsons, word for word. Its been around for 1215 years. Its a popular program and you canlittle kids can relate to it, my grand- mother can relate to it, so you know. In her discussion of authenticity Rowena stresses how The Simpsons enable her to connect with her children and parents, as well as other people in general (by being able to recount every word). For Nick and Rowena, these ob- jects are valuable because they enable them to engage in shared experiences on a daily basis. Again, central to both Nicks and Rowenas accounts of authenticity is an ideal- ization of being together or community and of how par- ticular brands allow one to feel engaged with others (cf. Thompson 1997). Rose and Wood (2005) examined how such a contrived event as reality television could be au- thentic. We believe that one reason is that these highly pop- ular shows (Big Brother, Survivor, and American Idol) allow people to connect to shared experiences by providing the basis for water cooler conversations. For example, Row- enas stress on being able to recount episodes of the Simp- sons (such as mimicking signature phrases) would enable her to communicate with others who shared her love of the show. Feeling Virtuous The nal account of authenticity we identied captured informants who represented their authentic self by making judgments based on purity of motive. Conferring authentic- ity in these accounts was akin to expressing ones morals. Associated benets included the feeling of virtuousness that comes with staying true to ones morals and the spiritual enrichment that comes from seeing desired universal values in practice. Caroline, who denes herself as a nonmateri- alist and not much of a consumer, repeatedly recalled her experiences in India when discussing authenticity: Interviewer: What about your pictures of India? Caroline: I have done a lot of traveling in my life, and before I went to India every year, I went to a different country, and then I got to India, and I have been back 13 times because I feel there is a level of honesty and everything that is lacking in other places. Interviewer: Okay. I have never been to India so could you maybe explain what is it about India that is authentic? Caroline: I feel unlike other countries its been less touched by Western consumerism, Western values, Western civiliza- tion . . . so when I rst went there it was a country like I had never encountered . . . the food was different, the re- ligion, the way people related, their values. They seem to live life on a different level, concerned with different things that I think are more authentic and more meaningful. Interviewer: What are the things that they are concerned with? Caroline: The way they approach people I think is more authentic. They are concerned with family, with a basic sort of values perhaps because life is harder for them. Again I am generalizing because recently now they are open to the West, you know, theres Star TV in India, theres computers, outsourcing, so they are changing very, very rapidly, which I nd sad. Interviewer: Yes. Caroline: But before all that they are concerned with the universal things about life that are nothing to do with consuming. Carolines passage reveals that she regularly seeks spir- itual enrichment by traveling to India. She gains a number of positive outcomes from such self-authenticating acts. First, she believes that by traveling to places where people live her values, she can engage in more meaningful rela- tionships, particularly as the local inhabitants are more gen- uine because they are less interested in material pursuits (People didnt want anything from you so they were in- THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 847 terested in you as a person). Second, Caroline is able to present herself to others as someone of moral conviction because she is active in living her values. Carolines account of authenticity idealizes a set of values she feels she cannot nd in her everyday life in Australia. Her attraction to these values is emphasized in Carolines discussion of the totality of differences between Australia and India (in terms of food, religion, customs, and values). These differences demon- strate that another world (a world she values) is possible if one is prepared to reject consumerism. Consistent with Carolines attempt to transcend materi- alist pursuits, informants accounts of virtue revealed no- tions of innocence and being free from false pretense. For example: Interviewer: Can you explain in detail what you see in this picture? Anita: Yes. Theres a small child with his socks down playing with a cricket bat thats been handmade by a couple of pieces of wood. Theres a couple of kids looking, and theres another child squatting down behind him ready to catch the ball. Interviewer: So what do you see, and how is it related to authenticity? Anita: Well, I thought it was related to authenticity because it looks like an honest, down-to-earth picture, just the in- nocence of children playing. You cant get more truthful than children playing. Caroline: I picked Michelangelos Pieta because I think that encapsulates really authentic emotion. Its the mother with the dead son and the grief, and its a very emotional piece that taps into universal feelings. Interviewer: So the sculpture describes the authentic feelings? Caroline: Yes. The person who sculptured it has produced a sculpture that is about very authentic basic human emotion. Every mother would experience that if she lost a son. Interviewer: So not Michelangelo himself that you would associate with authenticity but the feelings? Caroline: Yes, what he has produced. He may have sculp- tured that for money. Someone may have commissioned him, in which [case] the authenticity doesnt really come from him, but he has produced something beautiful and honest. To me its authentic. Anitas and Carolines focus on notions of universal in- nocence, honesty, and truth characterized other accounts of virtue. For Anita, children were seen as authentic because their play was not compromised by self-interest. Caroline also draws a link between authenticity and universal emo- tions. She virtually dismisses the role played by the artist (and his motives) and those of his sponsor, attributing au- thenticity only to the universal emotion conveyed in the work itself. Consistent with the accounts of control and connection, informants applied notions of virtue to their assessments of brands. Caroline and Renee judge Nike to be inauthentic because of a lack of morals (see table 2 for further exam- ples). For example, although Renee recognizes that the brand became a market leader through creativity, it is the perceived lack of social ethics that drives her judgment, including her subsequent decision to stop using Nike. Judy judges Barbie to be inauthentic because of the negative impact on the body image of young girls (while Cabbage Patch dolls are au- thentic for the opposite reason). For these three (and other) informants, breaches of ethical norms resulted in a loss of authenticity because the brands were judged as lacking moral ber. For example: Mario: McDonalds I suppose would be the prime example of dishonesty. Interviewer: How? Mario: Well, in the past they have always kind of promoted their food as giving well-being and happiness and really it was a bad product. Interviewer: Authenticity and honesty, are they the same? Mario: Yes, for me for something to be authentic its got to be honest. Interviewer: Okay. Mario: And not trying to cheat someone or market something when they know that its not a good product. Central to accounts of virtue were notions of honesty and a lack of ulterior motive. Both Marios and Renees (see table 2) assessments of McDonalds and Nike reect this ideal. In both cases, the offending brands are viewed as trying to gain something by stealth, such as perceptions of quality or higher margins. Once these brands have been found out they are judged as inauthentic brand partners because of their suspect motives. In each case, brands are judged against a moral standardMcDonalds was viewed as deceitful because of the gap between the marketing mes- sages and the healthiness of the their products, while Nike was a cynical exploiter of workers and consumers because they presented themselves as the world leader yet failed to live up to this claim in their day-to-day business practices. Consistent with notions of transcending the self, when seeking virtue, informants were critical of luxury brands because their pricing was not proportional to the products utility. This business strategy reected false pretense or the promotion of conspicuous consumption. Such selsh mo- tives were seen as out of step with the real necessities of living. In contrast, brands focused on serving peoples basic needs were judged more favorably. For example: Caroline: Like some of those handbags that cost hundreds of dollars. Chanel and Givenchy. . . . They are just a handbag but I think to create a desire amongst people for something that costs so much money which is out of proportion to the 848 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH worth of the item is immoral when people are starving. Thats not authentic to me. Its not honest. I am looking for things to have a meaning, and if you pay for something its got to have a commensurate value. Interviewer: What about the VW Beetle? Caroline: I think so because the original car was made for everyone to be able to afford, so I suppose its authentic. Carolines passages reinforce her earlier statements about pursuing what is meaningful, in this case by challenging the morals of brands that charge so much for a functional item. Her stress on a universal claimpeoples basic need for foodover all other claims that Chanel and Givenchy may make about quality or symbolic value is consistent with her earlier statements in which she attributes authenticity to an entirely different set of values than those held by luxury goods companies. Carolines choice of the old VW Beetle contrasts with her criticism of luxury accessory brands ear- lier. Caroline values the Beetle because it was developed for the common person and because it was affordable. The object is authentic because there is a reasonable relation between price and function, and importantly, because the car was developed to provide transportation for the masses rather than for perceived supercial values such as prestige or status. Carolines emphasis on the motive for production as the source of the brands authenticity reinforces her view of self as a person of moral conviction. Summary of the Accounts: The Goal Contingent Nature of Authenticity The three goal-inspired accounts of authenticity should be viewed as being representative of self-relevant concep- tualizations of authenticity rather than as a by-product of personality traits. This is demonstrated in two ways. First, the accounts of authenticity covered above reveal the same informant (such as Meg and Rowena) seeking multiple benets. Second, the following two passages identify con- ict between competing goals. In Rosss discussion of McDonalds, two benets of authenticity (control and vir- tue) are important. I think theyre [McDonalds] authentic for what they, maybe theyre not, may beI think it really comes back to the ne lines of whats authentic. Certainly, it raises some serious concerns about health issues when youre talking about McDonalds, which you would say was authentic; its clear theyre delivering the same product the same way and in the same environment every time. So theyre trying to deliver what I would say was an authentic product. In terms of what theyve dont tell you, these things are going to lead to high obesity, but I dont think that makes them not authentic. Although Ross recognizes that McDonalds products may be morally gray, he can still nd authenticity in the product when he is seeking a guaranteed consumption experience (regardless of global location). Ross compartmentalizes au- thenticity around a series of situationsMcDonalds may not be an authentic product when seeking something healthy, but it is if one desires fast food. A second example provides further evidence of a goal-contingent view of authenticity. In Phils account, reference was made to the need to be realistic in establishing what was authentic. He spoke of his work and his desire to be environmentally conscious: Well, I was thinking and the fact is that my four-wheel drive is still authentic in its own strange way. I value the environ- ment, and it really does affect what I buy, and I think you should have values that you stick to. Yet I know that driving a big four-wheel drive seems a contradiction, but when we are talking about authenticity, I still see it as authentic in that it helps me do my job but also reminds me that I need to keep making an effort in other ways. Phils passage above involves a tension between two de- sired identity benetscontrol and virtue. Phil spoke with pride about his achievements in building his own business and of his four-wheel drive as being necessary to perform effectively (he needed a car well suited to carrying heavy surveying equipment). But as a committed environmentalist he was also aware that such a vehicle has high emissions and low fuel economy. Like Ross, Phil does not consider the four- wheel drive inauthentic but rather views the offending ob- ject as a reminder that he must make extra effort to look after the environment. AUTHENTICATING STANDARDS: A CULTURAL ACCOUNT A central tenet of consumer culture theory is that human agency operates within a social context (Arnould and Thomp- son 2005; Ratner 2000)that is, individual expressions reect more widely held social views or dominant myths (Hirschman 2000; Thompson 1997). We propose that the three personal goals (the desire for control, connection, and virtue) reected informants desire to respond to dominant sociocultural norms (Gergen 1991; Lifton 1993). Put another way, prevailing cul- tural inuences give rise to the standards that are applied in the conferring authenticity to objects, brands, and experiences (Ferrara 1998; Taylor 1991). The standards underpinning ac- counts of control, connection, and virtue reect three domi- nant sociocultural norms: being practical (control), partici- pating (connection), and morality (virtue). For example, informant accounts of control reected attempts at situational problem solving and an identity associated with achieving performance-related goals. Accounts of connection focused on immersion in something larger than oneself and doing ones bit as a community member. Accounts of virtue re- ected the widely held view that there are universal moral principles of right and wrong. Being Practical With regard to control, we identied four critical stan- dards: rsthand experience, independent judgment, veria- THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 849 bility, and instrumentality. These four standards reected a desire for consumer sovereignty, practical problem solving, and efcacy across a range of situations. Brand authenti- cation inuenced by the desire for control involved an ap- plication of standards appropriate to informed decision mak- ing. The signicance of rsthand experience, independent judgment, and veriability was evident in Tonys emphasis on testing the system when dealing with brands like ING, Megs desire for direct experience of product performance claims, Rowenas desire for healthy products, and Phils focus on selecting surf brands based on his own judgment and not that of others. When seeking control, informants desired messages that conveyed veriable performance benets, such as high in- terest rates, frizz control, or ingredient information, and they rejected more emotive claims. The skepticism (or cyni- cismsee Tony) toward marketing claims preexperience and the desire for verication of these claims (e.g., Meg and hair care products and William and Swiss watches; see table 2) provides further evidence of a requirement for indepen- dent judgment through rsthand experience and personal verication. The informants passages also provide evidence of their desire for instrumentality (of brands and self). For example, Tony appreciates INGs campaign because it enables him to make accurate comparison with other brands, thereby increasing his chances of getting the best possible resulta point reinforced by Michaels comments about Apple and Phils selection of surf brands. Phils appropriation of the meaning of surng and his SUV provide other examples of instrumentality in the way they reect his ability to be suc- cessful. Our informants shaped desired benets by using their experience and ability to make informed choices (see also Holt and Thompson 2004). The nature of control and its associated standards have rarely been explained culturally to better understand au- thenticityin fact, the benets and standards associated with control are often viewed as inauthentic because they indicate self-interested problem solving (see, e.g., Taylor 1991; Hochschild [1983] provides a rare counterexample). As well, such actions are often viewed solely through the lens of intentionality or agency (see Postrel [2003] for an example), which holds that individual actions occur with little recourse to wider social forces (Ratner 2000). However, the cultural idealization of the aforementioned standards are evidenced in the love of sporting achievement, the deni- gration of academics (in Australia often referred to as im- practical pointy heads), and the preference for pragmatism over ideology in many New World countries (Blainey 1994). Many top-rating shows in Australia are crime or police dramas, such as the Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) franchise, which has taglines such as Trust the evidence and Lets see where the evidence leads. The informants attitudes toward brands and associated marketing messages reected a dominant cultural theme usually associated with the inauthentic (insofar as com- mercial motives are rejected as not authentic by the sov- ereign consumer; Postrel 2003). The informants accounts reveal a desire for agency through independent decision makingchoices not inuenced by the emotions that often underpin marketer-driven iconic cues. The standards used by informants when seeking control reected what is called economic rationalism within Australia. Often commen- tators will denigrate this term when discussing authenticity by arguing that it leads to the dominance of large corpo- rations, reduction in consumer choice, and the loss of con- sumer power (e.g., Boyle 2003; Harris 2001; Seabrook 2000). However, free market politicians and business commen- tators regularly emphasize the power of the consumer to cease doing business with even the largest organizations (Rand 1967), and consumer agencies regularly test the functional performance of brands to identify the best-performing prod- uct/service and the best value for the money. Thus, in stressing functional performance benets, consumer sovereignty, and rational decision making, informants are reecting a culturally embedded normthat values an empowered, sensible consumer as opposed to a consumer as dupe (in fact, irrational acts such as impulse purchasing or extending mortgages to pay for luxuries are regularly denigrated at the cultural level as being the expenditure of the credit rich or spoilt youngsters). To date, these seemingly pragmatic norms have not been identied in research on authenticity. Participating In the case of the connection-based accounts, we iden- tied three standards driving judgments of authenticity: proximity, communal norms, and ubiquity. Across the in- formants accounts of connection, emphasis was given to being close to others. Brands and events provided the con- duit for people to connect by bringing community members or loved ones together as part of an authoritative perfor- mance (Arnould and Price 2000). For example, in Scotts discussions of his various encounters in Morocco, he em- phasized getting an understanding of the meaning of every- day Moroccan life (communal norms), but as he felt he could not fully appreciate this without living there, he was less concerned about traveling to the back region than having a local guide who could relay information. Louise, Nick, and Zoe stress being close to others (as represented by people, place, time, and culture) as central to authentication. This view is also shared by Rowena and reemphasized in her desire to see tennis stars up close and personal and out there sweating and working hard for the crowd. . . . You can really see these people giving their all rather than being on the news. Therefore, when seeking connection, informants often sought situations that put them in close proximity to others. Such a desire also feeds into two other related standardscommunal norms and ubiquity. Nick stresses the importance of partaking in a communal cycling event because it represents an activity that genuine members of the St. Kilda cycling fraternity engage in. He also points out that people are there because they want to be and that they undertake the grueling annual event out of 850 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH a sense of duty. This sense of duty was reinforced by Nicks attitude that one should follow the rules of events and adopt a mustnt grumble attitude to minor inconveniences such as waiting for ferries and the early morning start. Zoe em- phasizes similar themes, stressing the importance of putting in and giving back in her discussion of the role of com- munity members and organizations in bringing people to- gether and ensuring the vibrancy of the community through the socialization of children into such rituals. Scotts ac- ceptance of a local guides views as more real or true than what an outsider can experience also indicates how com- munal norms form the basis for assessment. This emphasis on communal norms to establish authenticity also translated into a preference for brands that were thought to reinforce cultural traditions. For example: Scott: I think theyve [Kraft] dropped the Australian part to it because they cant claim that anymore, but I dont think that they need to actually keep telling people that, because people know it, or they believe. Its originally Australian, . . . its still around now, were basically the only country in the world that eats it, and as far as were concerned its still Australian. Its not an Australian-owned brand, but for all intents and purposes Vegemite is Australian. Interviewer: Because Australians eat it? Scott: Yes, and our parents and our grandparents had it when they were growing up as well, so as far as were concerned its an authentic, original Australian product. Scotts passage represents several aspects of the standards underpinning informant accounts of connection. Because Vegemite is no longer an Australian-owned brand (thus one form of indexical connection to place has been lost), Kraft downplays any direct link to place. However, Scott regards this as unnecessary because the brand is an established icon among all Australians, remains a part of the fabric of Aus- tralian identity, and is therefore authentic despite being owned by a global parent company. The brand still enables him to connect with place because it is widely adopted by the community, is shared across generations, and remains something that all true Aussies eat. For Scott, the con- sumption of Vegemite marks one out as Australian. In the accounts in which emphasis was given to the impor- tance of connection, informants regularly selected high-prole established mass market brandsobjects not usually associated with authenticity. These brands are often viewed in highly benevolent terms (Rowena: Its [McDonalds] good for the economy; its good for Melbourne), with their ubiquity a sign of their relevance (and therefore value) to the community and their democratic nature (because they are available to all com- ers). For example: Interviewer: McDonalds is authentic? Zoe: Yes. Interviewer: What is it about McDonalds? Zoe: McDonalds, its everywhere. Interviewer: What do you meanbeing everywhere is authentic? Zoe: Its just everywhere, McDonalds is McDonalds. Interviewer: What is it about the brand? Zoe: Everyone loves it. And its just there, in your face, everywhere. Its just something that everyone indulges in without, you know, worrying. McDonalds is just there, its just there to be enjoyed all the time. Interviewer: Its affordable? Zoe: Yes. Rowena comments: Nike, its a common brand. The golden archesBig Mac, you get deals, cheeseburger, french fries, worldwide. You cant miss it. You go down St. Kilda Road or wherever and see the arches and you know. You can nd it anywhere. Or you see signs saying McDonalds 500 meters next right. In Zoes and Rowenas discussion of McDonalds and Nike, it was the ubiquity and common nature of these brands that made them authentic. The value Rowena placed on main- stream shared experiences and traditions resulted in a pref- erence for mass brands as demonstrated in the value she at- tributed to the widely shared ritual of watching The Simpsons and the fact that all ages can participate in the experience. The passages above highlight how authenticity is attributed symbols that literally dene the social landscape (in this way, authenticity through connection is inuenced by cognitive legitimacya determination driven by whether the object in question is an inevitable part of the environment and nec- essary for a comprehensible account of social reality; Such- man 1995, 58283). Major brands are highly visible repre- sentations of the social fabric because of their omnipresence and their age (i.e., they were institutionalized; Suchman 1995) and because they have evolved in line with changes in com- munal norms. These characteristics of brands that allow con- nection also explain Johns view regarding the decline in the authenticity of cigarette brands and the authenticity attributed to Campagnolo by Nick (despite the fact that he has no direct experience of the brand). Although community tradition is often seen as one pillar of authenticity (Arnould and Price 2000; Kozinets 2002), unique to our data on connection is the preference for ubiquitous, mass- marketed objects and emphasis on the mainstreamas authentic. This nding sits in direct contrast to research claiming that mass-marketed objects, or objects that appear tainted by the market or motivated by commercial considerations, lack au- thenticity (Beverland 2006; Boyle 2003; Kates 2004). In their accounts of connection as an expression of authenticity, the informants are reecting a number of cultural norms all of which can be broadly classied as participating. First, within Australia much of the popular cultural dis- course celebrates mainstream traditions, the everyday, and middle-class values, as demonstrated by the popularity of THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 851 reality television shows and the increasing casualization of news and current affairs shows hosted by ordinary pre- senters (who operate solely on a rst name or nickname basis) addressing day-to-day issues such as parenting tips and nancial advice for teens (McCamish 2008). Also, pop culture (including brands) has been elevated in status, while notions of high culture as special are downplayed or chal- lenged as elitist. Second, emphasis is placed on mutual re- sponsibility, or everyone doing their part to make society better, and there is genuine concern at the decline in vol- unteering, manners, local customs, and traditional events (cf. Putnam 2001). Further evidence of the sense of responsi- bility can be found in the public debates around national and local identity (i.e., what it means to be an Australian or a Melbournian). Fueling this debate is the acknowledg- ment of renewed interest in shared traditions by younger gen- erations (such as dramatic increases in attendance at the dawn service to remember Australian and New Zealand soldiers who fought in the two world wars) and a sense that other important traditions are under attack from policies usually lambasted as political correctness gone mad or un-Aus- tralian (e.g., attempts to remove Christmas celebrations from schools under the guise of multiculturalism). Third, despite claims that traditional family units are in decline, families are the preferred unit within much social discourse in Australia. The 2007 election featured a contest between two partiesone stressing the needs of working families and the other of mortgage belt families. We be- lieve a desire to preserve mainstream traditions, do your part, and value family results in a preference for ubiquitous commercial objects because they reect these values. For ex- ample, the brands referred to in informant accounts of con- nection were part of mainstream popular culture, espouse the importance of giving back, provide the conduit for shared intergenerational traditions, and have become a part of the social landscape to the extent that they gained iconic status. The very ubiquitous nature of these objects reects that they are inclusive and open to all in the community. Morality For virtue, we identied the two interconnected standards of purity and universality. Purity represents a consistent ap- plication of a set of morals, while universality means that these standards override other considerations. Purity was demonstrated by associations between notions of innocence (often reected in images of children playing) and seless- ness. Universality was reected in connections between identity characterizations, such as nonmaterialist, and gen- eral condemnations of commercial culture, a preference for cultures wholly different from Western ways of life, the application of universal assessments reected in terms such as dishonest, cheated, and worthwhile, and a pref- erence for brands that addressed universal needs (such as transport) rather than prestige or patriotism(these informants disliked Vegemite because it was promoted as Australian). The application of universal standards was reected in in- formant assessments of people (Ben Johnson) and brands (Nike and McDonalds) that have breached ethical standards or have failed to take into account their wider impact on society (Barbie). Regardless of the recognized merits of brands such as Nike or McDonalds, informants seeking virtue were intolerant of moral lapses. Behavior perceived as unethical overshadowed all other considerations in judg- ing the brand as (in)authentic. Carolines account of her travels to India reveals how these standards underpin her assessment of authenticity. In her com- parative assessment of Western versus Indian culture, Caroline believes India symbolizes her values (whereas the West may be considered profane) and represents the universal applica- tion of these values across different areas of life. When com- bined, these two standards allow Caroline to feel that her values are both moral and practical and that holding them is possible. Carolines emphasis on the lack of materialism(both hers and that of the Indian locals) is representative of a uni- versal judgmentboth against what she views as meaningless material pursuits and in terms of giving necessary priority to core values (interpersonal relationships, family, sharing, and survival). This point is reinforced in Carolines sadness re- garding Indias rapid economic growth, adoption of Western goods, and the displacement of core values. This process of establishing purity carries over to brandshence, Carolines preference for utilitarian brands whose motivation is to fulll the needs of everyone (e.g., her positive assessment of the VW Beetle because of its affordability) and through her re- jection of upscale brands that charge prices well in excess of the products utility value (e.g., Chanel and Givenchy). Despite sustained philosophical attacks on notions of cer- tainty in universal standards, concern with morality and uni- versal standards of right and wrong remain as widely held sociocultural norms. The informants accounts reected uni- versal norms, such as the lack of authenticity in contem- porary consumer culture (often associated with Western culture), universal notions of right and wrong, environ- mentalism, and a sense of a fair go (as reected in con- cerns about Nikes employment practicesthe notion of a fair go is a cornerstone of Australian identity; Blainey 1994). In each case, authenticity is associated with certain moral ideals that may involve disillusionment with the West- ern world (Taylor 1991), idealization of the innocence of primitive societies or nature (seen as innocent, pure, or free from self-interest; Campbell 1987; MacCannell 1973), and a desire to transcend self-interest (Trilling 1972). Al- though practical people are celebrated in society, so too are moral purists who sit outside institutions (such as univer- sities, churches, and parliament). These individuals are often affectionately referred to as impractical dreamers or as having their hearts in the right place (Blainey 1994). Such views represent a moral longing on behalf of society to transcend practical selsh concerns. The use of these varying standards in the different ac- counts suggests that informants engage in selective infor- mation processing and interpretation depending on the de- sired benets sought (i.e., consumers may draw on all three 852 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH accounts at different times to advance different identity goals)an issue we turn to next. AUTHENTICATING STRATEGIES The previous section demonstrated that informants ac- tively sought self-authentication across a wide variety of contexts. In each account informants related authenticity to positive identity benets and in so doing gave precedence to certain information cues while downplaying or ignoring others that were inconsistent with their assessment. In this way each informant was an active consumer (or creator) of authenticity rather than a passive receiver of information. The active processing of information to give preference to self and/or situationally relevant cues has been revealed in a number of studies on authenticity (as identied in the Theoretical Background). This processing involves moti- vated reasoning and more particularly the biasing and elab- oration of certain pieces of information for use as evidence in determining what is authentic (Kunda 1990). Goffman (1959) identied that, while there is a strong desire to have others know us as we really are, the reality of time and a myriad of other pressures result in purposeful editing and a selective projection of information in an attempt to convey the authentic self. As part of the motivated reasoning pro- cess, our informants employed four strategies (placement, inference, reduction, and projection). The rst strategy we identied was placement. Interest- ingly, where Arnould and Price (2000) identied internal orientations (such as spontaneity or intrinsic valuing) con- ducive to self-authentication, we found that informants lo- cated themselves externally in particular places or situations conducive to self-authentication. This involved traveling to places, attending events, engaging in particular experiences, and remaining loyal to certain brands. Across our accounts was a deliberate search for particular places that offered the possibility of self-authentication. In the section above, var- ious informants stressed the number of times they had trav- eled overseas or emphasized their regular attendance at key events or ritualistic attendance at certain events. In seeking outcomes associated with virtue, Caroline traveled widely before settling on India as a favored destination (and, as identied in her passage, she seeks a particular part of In- diathat not tainted by Western consumerism). Accounts of connection were replete with examples of placement, including using shows such as The Simpsons as a conduit for familial connection and shared experience (Rowena). Finally, accounts of control featured stories about going to the back region to seek out life as it really is, as opposed to the front people put on (William and Kate). In each case, placement involved informants availing themselves of a means to enact their identity goals. Motivated reasoning involves accentuating information that conrms identity or preferred outcome/position while giving less credence to contradictory evidence (Kunda 1990). Within the passages provided, informants regularly inferred meaning from events, people, or cues in their in- terpretation of authenticity. For example, to feel part of a shared experience, informants seeking to connect would in- fer shared motives and values among other participants at their chosen eventNick, for example, took it for granted that other cyclists shared the same motives for being at the Round the Bay in a Day ride. Likewise Zoe inferred like- mindedness and commitment to community from the intent (sponsorship) of local surf shops. Caroline infers from the friendliness of locals and their impoverished conditions that they have transcended selsh motives or material desires. Tony and the other informants infer from emotional brand messages a desire to trick consumers into parting with their money. Reduction involves eliminating superuous elements to nd the essence of a brand. For example, despite Tonys claim that ING only focuses on rational product performance in its advertisements, this statement represents the result of removing the lifestyle messages in the brands marketing communications (advertising for the brand features Scottish comedian Billy Connolly, who emphasizes that by choosing ING you are a smarter personin contrast to Tonys claim to the contrary). Williams assessment of the redesigned VW Beetle involves stripping away the marketing claims and focusing on whether the new version resembles the original one he owned and lovedI dont believe what they have put down as words because its just marketing words and hype. But I look at the product itself, and I can relate to the product because you can still see an outline of the old car. Likewise, accounts of virtue involve reducing the brand to a moral core, while accounts of connection focused on evidence that suggested being part of a communitysuch as heritage, adoption by the mass market, and ubiquity. The strategy of projection has been identied in previous research on authenticity, particularly where informants must negotiate paradoxical situations. For example, several of Rose and Woods (2005) informants projected desired values onto cast members in reality television shows in order to build an authentic connection with the show. Our informants projected their desired identities onto events in order to re- inforce their personal narrative and gain desired benets. For example, in seeking virtue, Caroline projected her desired values onto Indian locals whose friendliness reected a certain moral stance. Tony engaged in projection in his discussion of the ING brand. Central to Tonys account of INGs au- thenticity is that it provides him with factually testable in- formation to allow him to make the best possible judgment. This reects Tonys desired identity (as did Michaels dis- cussion about Apple) as someone who has achieved the best possible outcomes by applying his resources (knowledge, ef- fort, skills, wisdom). Rowena and Zoe project their motives for attending various events onto other attendees to reinforce the belief that they are connected to a community. Nick pro- jects his belief that he is a true cyclist onto the Campagnolo brandhe determines that Campagnolo creates quality prod- ucts to benet the cycling community because it focuses only on cycling. THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 853 FIGURE 2 THE MANIFESTATION OF AUTHENTICITY IN OBJECTS, BRANDS, AND EXPERIENCES (OBE) DISCUSSION Our ndings contribute to our understanding of the con- sumption and production of authenticity in a number of ways. We identify that, when consumers have different goals, they seek authenticity in different kinds of experi- ences. Three broad goals are identied (control, connection, and virtue) that drive the systematic selection and evaluation of different consumption experiences as being (in)authentic. However, despite the different goals, experiences, and cues, our informants shared a common questthe desire for the real, true, and genuine (i.e., the authentic). That is, consum- ers ultimately seek the same thing (authenticity) in different objects, brands, and events for different reasons (control, connection, and/or virtue). In articulating our ndings, we also provide an overarching framework for understanding consumer judgments of authenticity. Our ndings demon- strate a hierarchy of meaning and causality in regard to the production of the authentic. This is identied in gure 2. Figure 2 identies the interconnectedness between con- sumers search for authenticity; different categories of ex- periences that lead to assessments of genuineness, reality, and truth (control, connection, and virtue); and specic ex- periences that lead to assessments of control, connection, and virtue. Importantly, notions of control, connection, and virtue are not in and of themselves authentic; rather they are viewed as authentic only when they lead to genuineness, reality, and/or truth. Specic objects, brands, and events provide the means by which consumers make assessments of control, connection, and virtue, and therefore judgments of authenticity. The same event may be judged (in)authentic by the same or different consumers depending on the goal. For example, the Simpsons may provide the route to con- nection (and genuineness and authenticity) for Rowena be- cause of the shows ubiquity, while in a different context the show may provide her with a feeling of control because of its child-friendly content (lack of profanity, violence, rac- ism, etc.). In identifying the inuence of personal goals on judgments of authenticity, we counter claims by Baudrillard (1988) and Eco (1986) that authenticity is impossible where common standards for what is real or fake are lacking. The problem with this line of thinking is that it presupposes universal stan- dards. However, as our ndings clearly show, different per- sonal goals and standards enable people to nd authenticity in a range of objects, brands, and events that others may deem as fake. Therefore, we add support to Rose and Woods (2005) notion of hyperauthenticity, in which consumers actively con- struct personally useful notions of the authentic. In doing so, we also identify the consumer as an adept, creative, and ca- pable producer of authenticity against a background of seem- ingly competing societal norms. In contrast to previous research or philosophical reections on authenticity, the informants in this study found authenticity in functional and ubiquitous objects. Far from needing to be rescued from mass culture (Benjamin 1960; Boyle 2003), authenticity was found in mainstream events and brands, in- 854 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH cluding fast food, mass fashion and entertainment, and bath- room products. Our research also helps to explain Grayson and Martinecs (2004) nding that consumers attributed au- thenticity to a Sherlock Holmes tourist site. For many Anglo- Saxon consumers, Sherlock Holmes was a childhood hero and a part of social reality. Thus, such a tourist site enables visitors to reconnect with shared childhood experiences and provides a coherent account of Holmess life that ts with the socially constructed view of reality. Put simply, the object (the Holmes site) is a vehicle for people to connect. By identifying the goal-contingent nature of authenticity judgments and the standards and strategies employed, these ndings provide a bridge between previous and future re- search on the consumption of authenticity. They also go some way toward reducing the fragmented nature of research on authenticity (see Beverland 2005). To date, the majority of this research has focused on the cues that indicate au- thenticity. Although such research is necessary, there are two major limitations in such studies: rst, they result in a diversity of conceptualizations of authenticity; second, they are unable to account for unexpected results, such as con- sumer inclination to attribute authenticity to the ctional (Grayson and Martinec 2004). The identication of a con- tingent relationship between consumer goals and particular cues overcomes this latter limitation, suggesting that the relationship between how one achieves self-authentication and authenticates an object is tighter than previously sug- gested (Grayson and Martinec 2004; Leigh et al. 2006). As well as providing an overarching framework for pre- vious research on cues, we also identify processes consumers use to realize the benets of authenticity. Rose and Woods (2005) focus on the processes underpinning authenticity judgments represents an important point of departure from previous research because it avoids dichotomies between the real and the fake and focuses on how consumers interpret authenticity in everyday events. We extend this by drawing explicit links between identity goals and the means by which consumers authenticate brands, thus locating process issues within the consumers life world. One such example of process strategy that adds to our understanding of the inclination to negotiate paradox (Rose and Wood 2005) and suspend disbelief (Belk and Costa 1998; Grayson and Martinec 2004) is that, through repeated exposure (placement) to the contextfor example, online social networksother goal-oriented processes such as in- ference or projection become paramount as they enable con- sumers to attach themselves to idealized values or identities that validate their concept of self (Schau and Gilly 2003). Extending this further, and consistent with Rose and Woods (2005) thinking, advancement of the self-authentication goal (e.g., validation through online social networking of the im- portance one places on community) may in future engage- ments overshadow any concerns that elements of the ex- perience might be inauthentic. We also extend Arnould and Prices (2000) focus on out- comes of self-authentication by identifying how consumers deal with the seeming ux of the postmodern marketplace. By accounting for goals (benets), standards, and processes, we highlight the creativity or adeptness of consumers in nding authenticity in the postmodern world. Just as an overemphasis on the self or the other may lead to isolation and alienation or a lack of individuality, our informants are aware of the need to forge an identity that marries the self- interest with community norms while tapping into universal moral norms. These ndings suggest that consumers are very adept at adjusting to changes in the macro environment (see Thompson 2000). Far from struggling to distinguish real from fake (hyperreality) or suffering identity crises from declines in traditional markers of authenticity, our infor- mants were highly competent when it came to sorting real from fake, creating the genuine through selective use of cues and nding, retaining, reinforcing, reimagining, and creating traditions. Also evident in the ndings is the consumers chameleon-like ability to adapt to, or morph across, chang- ing surroundings by drawing on particular strategies, stan- dards, and cues to achieve self-authentication. Figure 2 identies the relationship between specic objects, brands, and experiences and the search for authenticity. In this search, consumers may look for indexical cues that signal authenticity. However, consumers may also transform iconic cues (using the four strategies identied herein) into indexical ones. That is, successful goal attainment involves consumers taking personal ownership of experiences, thus giving objects, brands, and/or events an indexical character. Although Bev- erland et al. (2008) suggest that indexicality and iconicity are interrelated, our ndings identify why this is so and how iconic cues are transformed into indexical ones. Future re- search is needed to examine whether some goals are more powerful than others in achieving this transformation. Several other potential lines of inquiry emerge from our ndings. First, it is unlikely that we have uncovered all the goals, underpinning standards, and strategies that underpin different interpretations of authenticity in consumption. Re- search is therefore needed to expand upon our ndings. Future research on the effectiveness of each strategy (or strategies) in achieving self-authentication goals is also needed. Al- though we identied four strategies underpinning authenticity judgments, we were not able to examine whether consumers used single strategies or specic mixtures of strategies when seeking particular goals. For example, is placement critical for connection but not so important for control? Further in- terpretive and experimental research is needed to explore this issue. The second stream of future research requires a shift of focus from the authentic/inauthentic dichotomy to how con- sumers reconcile competing interpretations of what is au- thentic. Informants such as Ross and Phil adopt different approaches when dealing with conicts between different standards. Ross, for example, compartmentalizes meanings associated with McDonalds so that it is seen as authentic when desiring a quick and safe meal overseas but is judged less than favorably when viewed from a moral standpoint. Phil, in contrast, synthesizes the competing standards of control and virtue by using the SUV both as a symbol of THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN CONSUMPTION 855 his personal effectiveness and material gain and as a re- minder to be even more mindful of environmental issues in other aspects of his life. Future research is needed to explore the means by which consumers deal with competing stan- dards. Such research could explore the creative approaches used by consumers to manage this tension and the capabil- ities underpinning this creativity. It may also be possible to gain a richer understanding of the processing of information by examining if the self-authenti- cation motive biases information processing in predictable ways. Beverland et al. (2008) propose that literal or indexical authenticity is desired when correct but prompt in situ decisions are necessary. For example, in the context of beer selection, cues that clearly reinforce one message and the absence of cues that undermine this message are desired when informants want to make the correct beer choice. Thus, Beverland et al. (2008) provide evidence for a relationship between a desired benet and the process of reduction. We nd a similar result in relation to controlbrand claims are reduced to key performance-re- lated information. Future research could investigate these re- lationships using controlled experiments. Gergen (1991) proposes that the postmodern self is es- sentially a relational self. The pluralistic framework pro- posed here supports such a view as consumers draw on capabilities to relate to their immediate surroundings, a sense of community, and humanity in general. As well, the ca- pabilities demonstrated by our informants in reconciling conicts between competing interpretations of authenticity suggest that the capable consumer is similar to the protean self, whereby authenticity is realized by not only recognizing but embracing the complexity and ambiguity of postmodern life. The three interpretations of what is real, genuine, or true provide insight into how consumers manage to create a self that is at once uid and grounded (the protean self), in that they emphasize the continuous effort consumers en- gage in when seeking to create a self capable of the multiple presentations necessary in a postmodern environment (Lif- ton 1993, 89). REFERENCES Arnould, Eric J. and Linda L. Price (2000), Authenticating Acts and Authoritative Performances: Questing for Self and Com- munity, in The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Per- spectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, ed. S. Ratneshwar, David Glen Mick, and Cynthia Huffman, Lon- don: Routledge, 14063. Arnould, Eric J. and Craig J. Thompson (2005), Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research, Journal of Con- sumer Research, 31 (March), 86882. Baudrillard, Jean (1988), America, London: Verso. Belk, Russell W. and Janeen Arnold Costa (1998), The Mountain Man Myth: A Contemporary Consuming Fantasy, Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 21840. Belk, Russell W., Guliz Ger, and Sren Askegaard (2003), The Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion, Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (December), 32651. Bendix, Regina (1992), Diverging Paths in the Scientic Search for Authenticity, Journal of Folklore Research, 29 (2), 10332. Benjamin, Walter (1960), The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, New York: Schocken. Berger, Peter (1973), Sincerity and Authenticity in Modern So- ciety, Public Interest, 31 (Spring), 8190. Beverland, Michael B. (2005), Crafting Brand Authenticity: The Case of Luxury Wine, Journal of Management Studies, 42 (5), 100330. (2006), The Real Thing: Branding Authenticity in the Luxury Wine Trade, Journal of Business Research, 59 (Feb- ruary), 25158. Beverland, Michael B., Adam Lindgreen, and Michiel W. Vink (2008), Projecting Authenticity through Advertising: Con- sumer Judgments of Advertisers Claims, Journal of Adver- tising, 37 (1), 516. Blainey, Geoffrey (1994), A Shorter History of Australia, Melbourne: Heinemann. Boyle, David (2003), Authenticity: Brands, Fakes, Spin, and the Lust for Real Life, London: HarperCollins. Brown, Stephen (2001), Marketing: The Retro Revolution, London: Sage. Bruner, Edward M. (1994), Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Critique of Postmodernism, American Anthropologist, 96 (2), 397415. Campbell, Colin (1987), The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumption, London: Blackwell. Cohen, Erik (1988), Authenticity and Commoditization in Tour- ism, Annals of Tourism Research, 15 (3), 37186. Chronis, Athinodoros and Ronald D. Hampton (2008), Consum- ing the Authentic Gettysburg: How a Tourist Landscape Be- comes an Authentic Experience, Journal of Consumer Be- haviour, 7 (2), 11126. Costa, Janeen Arnold and Gary J. Bamossy (1995), Culture and the Marketing of Culture: The Museum Retail Context, in Marketing in a Multicultural World: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Cultural Identity, ed. Janeen Arnould Costa and Gary J. Bamossy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 299328. Culler, Jonathan (1981), Semiotics of Tourism, American Journal of Semiotics, 1 (1/2), 12741. Eco, Umberto (1986), Travels in Hyperreality: Essays, San Diego, CA: Harcourt. Emmons, Robert A. (2005), Striving for the Sacred: Personal Goals, Life Meaning, and Religion, Journal of Social Issues, 61 (4), 73146. Ferrara, Alessandro (1998), Reective Authenticity: Rethinking the Project of Modernity, London: Routledge. Gergen, Kenneth J. (1991), The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Iden- tity in Contemporary Life, New York: Basic Books. Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Grayson, Kent and Radan Martinec (2004), Consumer Perceptions of Iconicity and Indexicality and Their Inuence on Assess- ments of Authentic Market Offerings, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 296312. Harris, Daniel (2001), Cute, Quaint, Hungry and Romantic: The Aesthetics of Consumerism, Cambridge, MA: Da Capo. Hirschman, Elizabeth (2000), Heroes, Monsters and Messiahs: Movies and Television Shows as the Mythology of American Culture, Kansas City: McNeel. Hochschild, Arlie R. (1983), The Managed Heart: Commerciali- zation of Human Feeling, Berkeley: University of California Press. 856 JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH Holt, Douglas B. (1998), Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (June), 125. Holt, Douglas B. and Craig J. Thompson (2004), Man-of-Action Heroes: The Pursuit of Heroic Masculinity in Everyday Con- sumption, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 42540. Kates, Steven M. (2004), The Dynamics of Brand Legitimacy: An Interpretive Study in the Gay Mens Community, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 45564. Kozinets, Robert V. (2002), Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man, Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (June), 2038. Kunda, Ziva (1990), The Case for Motivated Reasoning, Psy- chological Bulletin, 108 (3), 48098. Leigh, Thomas W., Cara Peters, and Jeremy Shelton (2006), The Consumer Quest for Authenticity: The Multiplicity of Mean- ings within the MG Subculture of Consumption, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (4), 48193. Lifton, Robert J. (1993), The Protean Self: Human Resilience in an Age of Fragmentation, New York: Basic Books. MacCannell, Dean (1973), Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings, American Journal of Sociology, 79 (3), 589603. McCamish, Thornton (2008), Journeys on a Small Screen, Sun- day Age, April 27, 15. McCracken, Grant (1988), The Long Interview, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miller, Daniel (2008), The Comfort of Things, Cambridge: Polity. Postrel, Virginia (2003), The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Con- sciousness, New York: HarperCollins. Putnam, Robert D. (2001), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Re- vival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster. Quester, Pascale, Michael B. Beverland, and Francis Farrelly (2006), Brand-Personal Values Fit and Brand Meanings: Ex- ploring the Role Individual Values Play in Ongoing Brand Loyalty in Extreme Sports Subcultures, in Advances in Con- sumer Research, Vol. 33, ed. Cornelia Pechmann and Linda L. Price, Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 2127. Rand, Ayn (1967), Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, New York: Signet. Ratner, Carl (2000), Agency and Culture, Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30 (4), 41334. Relph, Edward (1976), Place and Placelessness, London: Pion. Richins, Marsha (2005), What Consumers Desire: Goals and Mo- tives in the Consumption Environment, in Inside Consump- tion: Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, ed. S. Ratnesh- war and David Glen Mick, New York: Routledge, 34048. Rose, Randall L. and Stacy L. Wood (2005), Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television, Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (September), 28496. Schau, Hope Jensen and Mary C. Gilly (2003), We Are What We Post? Self-Presentation in Personal Web Space, Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (December), 385405. Seabrook, John (2000), Nobrow: The Culture of Marketing, the Marketing of Culture, New York: Random House. Spiggle, Susan (1994), Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), 491503. Suchman, Mark C. (1995), Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571610. Taylor, Charles (1991), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Thompson, Craig J. (1997), Interpreting Consumers: A Herme- neutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from the Texts of Consumers Consumption Stories, Journal of Mar- keting Research, 34 (November), 43855. (2000), Postmodern Consumer Goals Made Easy! in The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Con- sumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, ed. S. Ratneshwar, Da- vid Glen Mick, and Cynthia Huffman, London: Routledge, 12039. Thompson, Craig J., Aric Rindeisch, and Zeynep Arsel (2006), Emotional Branding and the Strategic Value of the Doppel- ganger Brand Image, Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 5064. Trilling, Lionel (1972), Sincerity and Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Wang, Ning (1999), Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Expe- rience? Annals of Tourism Research, 26 (2), 34970. Copyright of Journal of Consumer Research is the property of Journal of Consumer Research, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.