Epin

Republic of the Philippines
5
th
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT
Mondragon-san Roque
Mondragon, Northern Samar
LEOV!L"O MON#$NO, %VL %$SE NO& '((
Plaintiff,
-)ersus- *or+
,ERN$L"O *R$N-.EL$, et&al&, O/NERS0P
"efendants&
1------------------------------------------1
ORDER
Let this case be reset to $ugust 23, 3(24 at 5+6( in the
morning&
Send notice to the counsel for the plaintiff for the ne1t
resetting&
SO OR"ERE"&
7ul8 5, 3(24, Mondragon, Northern Samar&
EMERENCIANA O.
MANOOK
Presiding 7udge
9:le
Pro)ince of Northern Samar
5
th
M.N%P$L %R%.# #R$L %O.R# %O.R# O*
V%#OR$-S$N $N#ONO
0ERS O* NOR,ER#O S$MP$;$N, %VL %$SE NO& <=
Rep& ,8+ ROS$RO, $MP$RO and
ROS#$, all surnamed S$MP$;$N,
Plaintiffs,
-)ersus- *or+
LOREN-O ROSM$, et&al&, >uieting of #itle and Reco)er8
"efendants& Of Possession and O?nership
1-----------------------------------------------1
JUDGEMENT
*iled on September 2, 2===, this complaint for >uieting of #itle
and Reco)er8 of Possession and O?nership pitiabl8 dragged on protracted
proceedings for se)eral 8ears& #he %ourt therefore e1erted earnest effort to
facilitate the immediate resolution of this case resulting in a peaceful
agreement bet?een the parties& $fter a ne? sur)e8 ?as conducted, the
remaining defendants )oluntaril8 )acated and remo)ed all impro)ements
introduced on the land claimed b8 plaintiff&
n )ie? of the foregoing, the court hereb8 dismisses this
complaint& #he a?ard for damages claimed b8 plaintiff is denied&
NO %OS#S&
SO OR"ERE"&
Mondragon for Victoria, Northern Samar, 7une 2(, 3(24&
EMERENCIANA O. MANOOK
Presiding 7udge
ERLN"$ MS#ELLERO, %VL %$SE NO& '2=
Plaintiff,
-)ersus- *or+
"$NLO $%E"ER$, O?nership and Possession ?ith
Pra8er
"efendant& *or Preliminar8 Mandator8
n:unction
1----------------------------------1
ORDER
/ith the denial of the motion to issue subpoena, the defendant@s
counsel is directed to file his formal offer of e1hibits ?ithin tenA2(B da8s
from toda8, and for the plaintiff to file his comment& $fter?hich, this case
?ill be submitted for decision&
SO OR"ERE"&
7une 2C, 3(24, Mondragon, Northern Samar&
Presiding 7udge
9:le
SPS& *RE""E and %;N#0$ %VL %$SE NO& CC<
>.RNO, et& al&,
Plaintiffs,
-)ersus- *or+
M$RSS$ M$N!$"$, RE%OVER; O*
O/NERS0P
"efendant, and POSSESSON
1--------------------------------------1
ORDER
/ith the manifestation of the counsel for the plaintiff that he
has no other ?itnesses to be presented, he is hereb8 gi)en tenA2(B da8s to
file his formal offer of e1hibits& #he defendant is also gi)en same period of
tenA2(B da8s from receipt to file his comment and opposition to the formal
offer of e1hibits&
Let this case be reset for defendants@ e)idence to 7ul8 35, 3(24
at 5+6( in the morning&
SO OR"ERE"&
7une 2C, 3(24, Mondragon, Northern Samar&
EMERENCIANA O.
MANOOK
Presiding 7udge
9:le

5
th
Mondragon-San Roque
PEOPLE O* #0E P0LPPNES, %RMN$L %$SE NO&
5'(3
%omplainant,
-)ersus- *or+
R$.L ES#RER$, et& al&, $".L#ER;
$ccused&
1---------------------------------------1
ORDER
#he motion of the counsel for the defendants $tt8& Ramiro
$lDate that he be allo?ed to submit the 7udicial $ffida)its of his ?itnesses is
granted& Let this case be reset to $ugust 23, 3(24 at 5+6( in the morning&
Parties as ?ell as counsels are notified in open court for the
ne1t resetting&
SO OR"ERE"&
Presiding 7udge
9:le
5
th
MUNICIAPL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT
Mondragon-San Roque
5'62
%omplainant,
-)ersus- *or+
%$RLN! #ENE"ERO, SL!0# P0;S%$L
N7.RES
$ccused&
1---------------------------------------1
ORDER
/ith the information gi)en b8 the pri)ate complainant that she
?as not dul8 notified in the Mediation proceedings, let the records of this
case be returned to the Mediation %enter at %atarman, Northern Samar& /ith
the information gi)en b8 the complainant that she is no? residing at ,rg8&
,agasbas, ?here notice should be gi)en to her&
SO OR"ERE"&
Presiding 7udge
9:le
5
th
Mondragon-San Roque
PEOPLE O* #0E P0LPPNES, %RMN$L %$SE NO& 5'36
%omplainant,
-)ersus- *or+
$RN$L"O P$0MN$;$N, et& al&, M$L%O.S MS%0E*
$ccused&
1------------------------------------------1
ORDER
Let the hearing of this case be reset to $ugust 23, 3(24 at 5+6(
in the morning as agreed upon b8 the Public Prosecutor and counsel for the
accused& Let a subpoena be issued to SPO2 "anilo Picardal or an8
representati)e form the Police Station for him to bring and testif8 on the
Police ,lotter for the ne1t scheduled hearing&
SO OR"ERE"&
EMERENCIANA O.
MANOOK
Presiding 7udge
9:le
5C<<
%omplainant,
-)ersus- *or+
$!.S#N L.N$, RecEless mprudence
Resulting to
$ccused& 0omicide
1---------------------------------------1
DECISION
$ccused, $gustin Luna, is charged of the crime of recEless
mprudence Resulting to 0omicide, the nformation of ?hich reads as
follo?s+
That on April 4, 2007 at about 3:00 o'clock in the
afternoon, along the national Highway, arangay !"el#a,
$unicipality of $on#ragon, %ro&ince of 'orthern (a"ar,
%hilippine), within the *uri)#iction of thi) Honorable
+ourt, the abo&e,na"e# accu)e# in reckle)) an# i"pru#ent
"anner an# without #ue regar# to the )afety of life an#
property while #ri&ing a "otorcycle Hon#a wa&e -2., +olor
blue, an# in &iolation of traffic rule) an# regulation), #i# then
an# there, willfully, unlawfully an# feloniou)ly, bu"p /HA0 %1
$A2A00A'3(, inflicting "ortal in*urie) that cau)e# hi)
#eath1
+4'T/A/5 T4 0A617
$rraigned on $ugust 25, 3((= accused, assisted b8 counsel,
pleaded NO# !.L#;&
Pre-trial follo?ed ?hich resulted in the follo?ing stipulation of
facts for admissions and denials+
8A+T( 84/ TH3 %/4(3+9T!4':
-1 The #efen)e a#"itte# the i#entity of the accu)e#1
21 The #efen)e #i# not a#"it the #ate an# ti"e of the
inci#ent1
31 The #efen)e #i# not a#"it the place of the inci#ent which
happene# along the national Highway of rgy1 !"el#a,
$on#ragon, 'orthern (a"ar1
41 The #efen)e #i# not a#"it that the accu)e# Agu)tin 0una
bu"pe# /hal $agallane) which cau)e# hi) #eath1
:eci)ion in +ri"inal +a)e 'o1 ;<<.
%eople &)1 Agu)tin 0una
page ,2,
8A+T( 84/ TH3 :383'(3:
-1 The %ro)ecution #enie# the fact that the accu)e#
Agu)tin 0una i) an e"ployee of a certain erting
0i"1
21 The pro)ecution #enie# the fact that the "otorcycle
)ub*ect of the inci#ent i) owne# by erting 0i"1
3=H!!T( 84/ TH3 %/4(3+9T!4':
3>hibit A7 , 0etter co"plaint #uly )igne# by (%4- +lau#io
Alcera
3>hibit 7 , Affi#a&it or ?aa)uyan7 of :elia $agallane)
3>hibit +7 , Affi#a&it or?aa)uyan7 of 4rlan#o %ere@
3>hibit :7 , Affi#a&it or ?aa)uyan7 of (al&acion Aguno#
3>hibit 37 , certificate of :eath of /hal $agallane)
3>hibit 87 , 3>cerpt of the %olice lotter
3>hibit 27 , $e#ico,legal +ertificate of /hal $agallane)
3=H!!T( 84/ TH3 :383'(3:
'o #ocu"entary e>hibit1
6!T'3((3( 84/ TH3 %/4(3+9T!4':
-1 :elia $agallane), the pri&ate co"plainant
21 4rlan#o %ere@ of (itio alu#, rgy1 ugko, $on#ragon,
'orthern (a"ar
31 (al&acion Aguno# of rgy1 !"el#a, $on#ragon,
'orthern (a"ar
41 :r1 (ocorro $1 (ier&o, "e#ical officer ., '(%H,
+atar"an, 'orthern (a"ar1
An# twoA2B re)er&e witne))e)1
6!T'3((3( 84/ TH3 :383'(3:
-1 The accu)e# hi")elf Agu)tin 0una
An# twoA2B re)er&e witne))e)1
Prosecution presented Sal)acion $gunod, ?ho testified that on
$pril 4, 3((' at about 6+(( o@clocE in the afternoon, she ?as at the ?aiting
shed at Sitio "i8o, ,rg8& melda, Mondragon, Northern Samar ?aiting
together ?ith the )ictim rhal magallanes for a tric8cle going to %atarman&
/hen Rhal Magallanes ?as in the middle of the National high?a8 crossing
to ride the tric8cle, he ?as suddenl8 bumped b8 a motorc8cle dri)en b8 the
accused $gustin Luna&
%age ,3,
She together ?ith Patronilo rinco helped the )ictim ?ho ?as
then unconscious& #he )ictim had bruises on his hand, )er8 pale and and had
head
in:ur8& #he8 brought him to %atarman !eneral 0ospital ?here he ?as
admitted for medical treatment& Later, she learned that Rhal Magallanes
died& $sEed to identif8 the accused, ?itness pinpointed to $gustin Luna in
open court&
Presented as second ?itness is PO6 %laudio $lcera, Police
n)estigator at the Mondragon police station& 0e testified that he conducted
an in)estigation and identified the sEetch he made of the incident& 0e ?ent
to San Roque ?here he met the accused and the o?ner of the motorc8cle&
"elia Magallanes, mother of the )ictim testified that on april 4,
6((' she ?as informed through te1t message b8 Sal)acion $gunod that her
son ?as bumped b8 a motorc8cle, so she immediatel8 ?ent to the place in
Sitio "i8o, ,rg8& melda, Mondragon and ?as informed there that her son,
Rhal ?as alread8 brought to the hospital& She ?ent to the %atarman !eneral
0ospital ?here she found her son )er8 ?eaE and ?ho informed her that he
is not feeling ?ell and his head ?as painful& #he8 thereafter ?ent to
#acloban for further medical treatment at the "i)ine ?orld 0ospital& 0er
son ?as brought to ,ettan8 0ospital, later for %# Scan&
$fter the results, the doctor told them that Rhal needs an
operation as he ?as still feeling pain on his head& #he8 sta8ed for eightA5B
da8s at the hospital but later ?ent bacE to %atarman as the8 decided to go to
Manila& /hen the8 arri)ed in %atarman, ho?e)er, her son ?as immediatel8
brought again to %atarman !eneral 0ospital ?here he died on $pril 2<,
3(('& 0e testified that she incurred e1penses for her son@s confinement at
"i)ine /orld 0ospital in the amount of P2',5<4&((F P<,(((&(( for %t ScanF
for casEet and funeral ser)ices P3(,(((&((F for miscellaneous e1penses for
meals and snacEs more or less P3(,(((&((& No receipts ho?e)er ?ere
presented for these e1penses&
$ccused $gustin Luna despite se)eral settings for his
presentation of defense e)idence failed to come to court& Reports ?ere gi)en
that he left his place for an unEno?n address&
/0ERE*ORE, :udgment is hereb8 rendered finding the
accused, $gustin Luna, guilt8 be8ond reasonable doubt of the crime of
RecEless mprudence Resulting to 0omicide and is hereb8 sentenced to
suffer the penalt8 of Prision %orreccional Medium, form 6 8ears to C months
and 22 da8s to 4 8ears 5 months and 3( da8s and to pa8 the heirs moral and
e1emplar8 damages in the amount of P<(,(((&((, ci)il indemnit8 for
P<(,(((&(( and temperate damages in the amount of P3<,(((&((&
page ,4,
#he bail bond posted b8 the accused is hereb8 cancelled and
forfeited& Let a /arrant of $rrest be issued for the apprehension of the
accused, $gustin Luna&
SO OR"ERE"&
$pril 24, 3(24, Mondragon, Northern Samar&
EMERENCIANA O.
MANOOK
Presiding 7udge

5
th
Mondragon-San Roque
5'43
%omplainant,
-)ersus- *or+
PO2 $L*RE" %EREN$"O, !R$VE #0RE$#S
$ccused&
1---------------------------------------1
ORDER
Opposition to the Motion to >uash filed b8 the Public
Prosecutor sho?ed that baranga8 conciliation ?as conducted as sho?n in
the %ertificate to *ile $ction dated March 3C, 3(24, attached thereto&
/0ERE*ORE, the Motion to >uash filed b8 the accused is
hereb8 denied& 0o?e)er, the bailbond posted b8 him is ordered released
considering the penalt8 in)ol)ed is aresto ma8or still co)ered b8 the Rule on
Summar8 Procedure ?hich does not necessitate the issuance of a ?arrant of
arrest&
SO OR"ERE"&
Ma8 2C, 3(24, Mondragon, Northern Samar&
EMERENCIANA O.
MANOOK
Presiding 7udge
9:le

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES 1. NAME OF EMPLOYEE
CSC FORM NO. 1 ESPANO REYNANDO
CONGE
POSITION DESCRIPTION FORM (Surname) (Given Name) (Middle
Name)
2. DEPARTMENT, CORPORATION OR AGENCY 3. BUREAU OR OFFICE
Department of Education Mondragon Agro!ndu"trial Sc#ool
4. DEPT./BRANCH/DIVISION 5. WORK STATION/PLACE OF WORK
DepEd Divi"ion of Nort#ern Samar
. !. PRESENT APPROPRIATION ACT . PREV. APPROPRIATION ACT
BOARD RES./ BOARD RES./
ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE NO.
ITEM NO. ITEM NO.
". !. SALARY ". OTHER COMPENSATION
#. OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OR POSITION $. WORK OR PROPOSED TITLE
Admini"trative Officer !$ Admini"trative Officer
1%. WAPCO CLASSIFICATION OF THE POSITION 11. OCCUPATION GROUP TITLE
12. FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT POSITION, CHECK GOVERNMENT UNIT AND UNITS
CLASS
M%N!C!PA&!'Y ( ) C!'Y ( ) PRO$!NCE ( )
*
"t
( ) +
nd
( ) ,
rd
( ) -
t#
( ) .
t#
( ) /
t#
( ) 0
t#
( )
13. STATEMENT OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED,
PLEASE
ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEET.

*1 Revie2 and c#ec3 t#e veracit4 and aut#enticit4 of all re5uired "upporting document"
in all ca"e" of appointment"1
+1 Sign t#e follo2ing certification at t#e 6ac3 of t#e appointment7 certification a"
completene"" and aut#enticit4 of re5uirement"7 certification a" to pu6lication vacant
po"ition to 6e filled1
,1 En"ure t#at t#e PS8 C#airman #a" "igned t#e appointment1
-1 En"ure t#at all 5ue"tion of 9orm +*+ of t#e appointee are all an"2ered properl41
.1 Su6mit all appointment 2it# t#e pre"cri6ed tran"mittal form indicating t#e nature of
t#e appointee and t#e corre"ponding date of i""uance1
/1 Su6mit report" on mont#l4 "eparation" and acce""ion" to CSC1
01 A""i"t in t#e preparation and implementation of "c#ool program" to include
recruitment: #iring: cla""ification of "alar4 and 2age"1
;1 A""i"t t#e <ead of Office in e=ecution of dutie" t#at t#e CSC ma4 re5uire connection
2it# t#e e=amination: inve"tigation: promotion and ot#er per"onnel action"1
>1 ?eep +@* file" of per"onnel7 !""ue "ervice record"7 3eep leave card": record"
emplo4ee"
and ot#er related function" a" t#e ca"e ma4 6e1
14. POSITION TITLE OF IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR 15. POSITION TITLE OF NE&T
HIGHER
SUPERVISOR
1. NAME, TITLES AND ITEM NOS. OF THOSE YOU DIRECTLY SUPERVISE 'I( )*+, -.!/
0,1,/
(0) 230- */24 54 -.,3+ 3-,) /*0. !/6 -3-2,0
1". MACHINES, E7UIPMENT, TOOLS, ,-8. 90,6 +,:92!+24 3/ -., ;,+(*+)!/8, *( <*+=
Computer
1#. CONTRACTS> 1$. WORKING CONDITIONS
Occa"ional 9re5uent
Gen1 Pu6lic ( ) ( ) Normal Aor3ing Condition
Ot#er Agencie" ( ) ( ) 9ield Aor3
Supervi"or ( ) ( ) 9ield 'rip"
Management ( ) ( ) E=po"ed to varied Aeat#er
Ot#er("pecif4) ( ) ( ) Ot#er ("pecif4)
! CER'!9Y t#at t#e a6ove an"2er" are accurate and complete1
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
Date Signature of Emplo4ee
TO BE FILLED OUT BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
2%. D,08+35, 5+3,(24 -., :,/,+!2 (9/8-3*/ *( -., ;*03-3*/
21. D,08+35, 5+3,(24 -., :,/,+!2 (9/8-3*/ *( -., U/3- *+ S,8-3*/
Per"onnel Record" and Management
22. I/638!-, -., +,?93+,6 ?9!23(38!-3*/0 54 4,!+0 !/6 =3/6 *( ,698!-3*/ 8*/036,+,6 3/
(3223/: 9;*/
1!8!/84 (*+ -.30 ;*03-3*/. 'K,,; -., ;*03-3*/ 3/ )3/6 +!-.,+ -.!/ -., ?9!23(38!-3*/0 *(
-.,
;+,0,/- 3/89)5,/-@. T.30 3-,) 0.*926 5, (322,6 (*+ !22 ;*03-3*/0 *-.,+ -.!/ -,!8.3/:.
EDUCATION> College Graduate of a -4ear cour"e
TRAINING> One (*) 4ear e=perience (relevant)
E&PEREINCE> None re5uired
ELIGIBILITY> Career Service Profe""ional
23. LICENSE OR CERTIFICATES RE7UIRED TO THIS, IF ANY.

I HEREBY CERTIFY -.!- -., !5*1, !/0<,+0 !+, !889+!-, !/6 8*);2,-,.
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
D!-, S3:/!-9+, !/6 T3-2, *( 3)),63!-,
S9;,+130*+
APPROVED>
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
D!-, D,;E6, N*+-.,+/ S!)!+, D31303*/
%!-!+)!/
"epartment of Education
Regional Office No& V
DIVISION OF NORTHERN SAMAR
%atarman
LOL#O L& $N#ERO,
%omplainant, *or alleged+ $cts of Emotional $buse
through
0umiliating $ct in Violation
of
-)ersus- R$ 'C2(
$0ME" L.%,$N,
Respondent&
1--------------------------------1
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT
On 7anuar8 24, 3(24, Lolito L& $nterio of Poblacion 2, Sil)ino Lubos,
Northern Samar filed a letter-complaint before the Office of the Schools "i)ision
Superintendent, %atarman, Northern Northern Samar a letter-complaint against $hmed
Lucban, a Public School #eacher of Sil)ino Vocational 0igh School, Sil)ino Lubos,
Northern Samar for alleged $cts of Emotional $buse through 0umiliating $ct in
Violation of R$ 'C2(&
#he said letter-complaint upon receipt of the School 0ead referred to the
Regional "irector, "epEd and in turn referred bacE to the School Superintendent ?hich
resulted to the creation of a "i)ision *act *inding %ommittee to act on this matter&
%omplainant in his complaint alleged that his son 7ohn ,& $nterio, a
!rade 5 student of Sil)ino Lubos national 0igh School& #hat the incident happened at
about 5+(( o@clocE in the morning of 7anuar8 ', 3(24 at the class of the respondent
$hmed Lucban& #he complainant further alleged that the respondent uttered defamator8
?ords against his son and as a result his son has been traumatiDed and has de)elop no
interest in pursuing his studies& $ttached to the complaint are the police blotter, e1cuse
letter and medical report&
Prior to the commencement of formal in)estigation, the %ommittee
requires the herein complainant to submit pieces of e)idence to support his complaint
that is to include the statement of the alleged child )ictim but the compliance ?as not
sufficient as the complainant onl8 submitted solel8 the s?orn statement of the )ictim
and no other&
Respondent on his part, reiterated that he did not uttered defamator8
?ords to said student, that he onl8 asE the reason ?h8 said student ?as absent for those
period as stated and no other& #his statement of respondent teacher ?as supported b8
affida)its of se)eral students ?ho ?ere present in his class&
#he committee obser)ed that there ?as no forum-shopping in the
complaint& ,ased on the documents submitted b8 the complainant and the respondent, the
%ommittee commenced the in)estigation solel8 for the purpose of testing of the child
)ictim ?hich ?as pro)en as :ust product of ?hims and caprices and of being an egoistic
child ?ho percei)ed the action of his teacher as an act of humiliating him& #hus, aside
from the foregoing, it is safe or deemed appropriate to dismiss this case for lacE of merit&
%reli"inary !n&e)tigation /eport
page ,2,
/0ERE*ORE, the %ommittee belie)es that there no e1ists a prima facie
case against respondent $hmed Lucban& #herefore, the %ommittee recommends for the
dismissal of the charged against $hmed Lucban for alleged $cts of Emotional abuse
through 0umiliating $ct in Violation of R$ 'C2( for insufficienc8 of e)idence and for
non-obser)ance of the procedure in the proper filing of the administrati)e case as
mandated under the polic8 and guidelines go)erning the same&
$pril 6(, 3(24, %atarman, Northern Samar&
n)estigating Officer9s+
ELECTION OFFENSES
Article !!" Pre#e$ti$% the E&erci'e () the Ri%ht t( V(te
$rticle 2''&2+ "efinition of Offense
$ person ?ho commits the criminal offense of pre)enting the
e1ercise of the right to )ote ?hen he or she+
aB in the e1ercise of duties entrusted to him or her relating to
elections,
bB ?ith the intent to pre)ent another person from e1ercising his
or her right to )ote+
AB fails to record such person in a )oter registration listF
AB remo)es such person from the )oter registration
listF
AB in another manner pre)ents a person from
e1ercising his or her right to )ote&
$rticle 2''&3+ Penalt8
2& #he applicable penalt8 range for the criminal offense of
pre)enting the e1ercise of the right to )ote is one to fi)e
8ears imprisonment&
3& #he court ma8 impose a fine, as a principal penalt8, upon
a person con)icted of pre)enting the e1ercise of the right
to )ote&
Article !*" Vi(l+ti$% the Free Deci'i($ () V(ter'
$rticle 2'5&2+ "efinition of Offense
$ person commits the criminal offense of )iolating the free
decision of )oters ?hen he or she+
aB during elections, a recall )ote, or a referendum,
bB compels another person+
AB to )oteF
AB not to )oteF
AB to cast a )oid )oteF or
AVB to )ote in fa)or of or against a particular proposal
or personF
cB b8 means of force, serious threat, corruption or
deception, or in an8 other unla?ful manner&
$rticle 2'5&3+ Penalt8
2& #he applicable penalt8 range for the criminal offense
of )iolating the free decision of )oters is one to fi)e
8ears imprisonment&
3& #he court ma8 impose a fine, as a principal penalt8,
upon a person con)icted of )iolating the free decision
of )oters&
Article !," A-.'e () the Ri%ht t( V(te
$rticle 2'=&2+ "efinition of Offense
$ person commits the criminal offense of abuse of the right to
)ote ?hen he or she, during an election, a recall )ote, or a referendumF
aB )otes under the name of another personF
bB )otes e)en though he or she has alread8 )oted&
$rticle 2'=&3+ Penalt8
2& #he applicable penalt8 range for the criminal offense or
abuse of the right to )ote is one to fi)e 8ears
imprisonment&
a person con)icted of abuse of the right to )ote&
Article */" Vi(l+ti$% C($)i0e$ti+lit1 i$ V(ti$%
$rticle 25(&2+ "efinition of Offense
$ person commits the criminal offense of )iolating
confidentialit8 in )oting ?hen he or she+
aB b8 use of force, serious threat, corruption, or deception, or in
an8 other unla?ful mannerF
bB demands a person to re)eal ho? he or she )oted&
$rticle 25(&3+ Penalt8
)iolating confidentialit8 in )oting is one to fi)e 8ears
imprisonment
a person con)icted of )iolating confidentialit8 in )oting&
Article *" 2.1i$% +$0 Selli$% V(te'
$rticle 252&2+ "efinition of Offense
2& $ person commits the criminal offense of bu8ing )otes
?hen he or she+
AaB promises, offers, or gi)es to a person, directl8 or indirectl8, an undue
benefit, for the person or a third part8 or entit8F
AbB in order that the person+
AB )oteF
AB refrain from )otingF
AB cast a )oid )oteF
AVB cast his or her )ote in fa)or of or
against a particular person or proposal&
3& $ person commits the criminal offense of selling
)otes ?hen he or she+
AaB solicits or accepts, directl8 or indirectl8, an undue benefit, for himself or
herself or a third part8 or entit8F
AbB in order that the person+
AB )oteF
AB refrain from )otingF
AB cast a )oid )oteF or
AVB cast his or her )ote in fa)or of or against a
particular person or proposal&
$rticle 252&3+ Penalt8
bu8ing or selling )otes is one to fi)e 8ears imprisonment
a person con)icted of bu8ing or selling )otes&
Article *3" Electi($ Fr+.0
$ person commits the criminal offense of election fraud ?hen
he or she+
AaB adds, subtracts, or deletes )otesF
AbB publishes election results that do not correspond ?ith the
actual )oting resultsF or
AcB in an8 manner falsifies the results of an election&
#he applicable penalt8 range for the criminal offense of
election fraud is t?o to ten 8ears imprisonment&
Article *4" Thre+t t( +$ Electi($ C+$0i0+te
$ person commits the criminal offense of threat to an election
candidate ?hen he or she+
AaB threatens or commits an8 other unla?ful act against an
election candidateF
AbB ?ith the intention of forcing him or her to ?ithdra? his or
her candidac8 or to pre)ent him or her from e1ercising an8
acti)it8
legall8 permitted during an election campaign&
#he applicable penalt8 range for the criminal offense or threat
to an election candidate is t?o to ten 8ears imprisonment&G
RULES ON ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
RULE
COVERAGE
Secti($ . Sc(5e. 6 .nless other?ise pro)ided herein, these Rules shall
appl8 ?hene)er an electronic data message, as defined in Rule 3 hereof, is
offered or used in e)idence&
Secti($ 3. C+'e' c(#ere0. 6 #hese rules shall appl8 to all ci)il actions and
proceedings, as ?ell as quasi-:udicial and administrati)e cases&
Secti($ 4. A55lic+ti($ () the (ther r.le' ($ e#i0e$ce. 6 n all matters not
specificall8 co)ered b8 these Rules, the Rules of %ourt and pertinent
pro)isions of statues containing rules on e)idence shall appl8&
RULE 3
DEFINITION OF TERMS AND CONSTRUCTION
Secti($ . De)i$iti($ () Ter7'. 6 *or purposes of there Rules, the
follo?ing terms are defined, as follo?s+
AaB A)y""etric or public crypto)y)te"7 means a s8stem capable of
generating a secure Ee8 pair, consisting of a pri)ate Ee8 for creating a digital
signature, and a public Ee8 for )erif8ing the digital signature&
AbB u)ine)) recor#)7 include records of an8 business, institution,
association, profession, occupation, and calling of e)er8 Eind, ?hether or
not conducted for profit, or for legitimate purposes&
AcB +ertificate7 means an electronic document issued to support a
digital signature ?hich purports to confirm the identit8 or other significant
characteristics of the person ?ho holds a particular Ee8 pair&
AdB +o"puter7 refers to an8 single or interconnected de)ice or
apparatus, ?hich, b8 electronic, electro-mechanical or magnetic impulse, or
b8 other means ?ith the same function, can recei)e, record, transmit, store,
process, correlate, anal8De, pro:ect, retrie)e and9or produce information,
data, te1t, graphics, figures, )oice, )ideo, s8mbols or other modes of
e1pression or perform an8 one or more of these functions&
AeB :igital (ignature7 refers to an electronic signature consisting of
a transformation of an electronic document or an electronic data message
using an as8mmetric or public cr8ptos8stem such that a person ha)ing the
initial untransformed electronic document and the signer@s public Ee8 can
accuratel8 determine+
AB /hether the transformation ?as created using the pri)ate
Ee8 that corresponds to the signer@s public Ee8F and
AB /hether the initial electronic document had been
altered after
the transformation ?as made&
AfB :igitally )igne#7 refers to an electronic document or electronic
data message bearing a digital signature )erified b8 the public Ee8 listed in a
certificate&
AgB 3lectronic #ata "e))age7 refers to information generated, sent,
recei)ed or stored b8 electronic, optical or similar means&
AhB 3lectronic #ocu"ent7 refers to information or the
representation of information, data, figures, s8mbols or other modes of
?ritten e1pression, described or ho?e)er represented, b8 ?hich a right is
established or an obligation e1tinguished, or b8 ?hich a fact ma8 be pro)ed
and affirmed, ?hich is recei)ed, recorded, transmitted, stored, processed,
retrie)ed or produced electronicall8& t includes digitall8 signed documents
and an8 print-out our output, readable b8 sight or other means, ?hich
accuratel8 reflects the electronic data message or electronic document& *or
purposes of these Rules, the term @electronic documentH ma8 be used
interchangeabl8 ?ith electronic data message&
AiB3lectronic key7 refers to a secret code ?hich secures and defends
sensiti)e information that crosses o)er public channels into a form
decipherable onl8 ?ith a matching electronic Ee8&
A:B 3lectronic )ignature7 refers to an8 distincti)e marE,
characteristics and9or sound in electronic form& Representing the identit8 of
a person and attached to or logicall8 associated ?ith the electronic data
message or electronic document or an8 methodolog8 or procedure emplo8ed
or adopted b8 a person and e1ecuted or adopted b8 such person ?ith the
intention of authenticating, signing or appro)ing an electronic data message
or electronic document& *or such purposes of these Rules, an electronic
signature includes digital signatures&
AEB 3phe"eral electronic co""unication7 refers to telephone
con)ersations , te1t messages, chatroom sessions, streaming )ideo, and other
electronic forms of communication the e)idence of ?hich is not recorded or
retained&
AlB !nfor"ation an# +o""unication (y)te"7 refers to a s8stem for
generating, sending, recei)ing, storing or other?ise processing electronic
data message or electronic documents and includes the computer s8stem or
other similar de)ices b8 or in ?hich data are recorded or stored and an8
procedure related to the recording or storage of electronic data message or
electronic document&
AmB ?ey %air7 in an as8mmetric cr8ptos8stem refers to the pri)ate
Ee8 and its mathematicall8 related public Ee8 such that the latter can )erif8
the digital signature that the former creates&
AnB %ri&ate ?ey7 refers to the Ee8 of a Ee8 pair used to create a
digital signature&
AoB %ublic ?ey7 refers to the Ee8 of a Ee8 pair used to )erif8 a digital
signature&
Secti($ 3. C($'tr.cti($. 6 #hese Rules shall be liberall8 construed to assist
the parties in obtaining a :ust, e1peditious, and e1pensi)e determination of
cases&
#he interpretation of these Rules shall also taEe consideration the
international origin of Republic $ct No& 5'=3, other?ise Eno?n as the
Electronic %ommence $ct&
RULE 4
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
Secti($ . Electr($ic 0(c.7e$t' +' ).$cti($+l e8.i#+le$t () 5+5er6-+'e0
0(c.7e$t'. 6 /hene)er a rule of e)idence refers to the term of ?riting,
document, record, instrument, memorandum or an8 other form of ?riting,
such term shall be deemed to include an electronic document as defined in
these Rules&
Secti($ 3. A07i''i-ilit1. 6 $n electronic document is admissible in
e)idence if it complies ?ith the rules on admissibilit8 prescribed b8 the
Rules of %ourt and related la?s and is authenticated in the manner
prescribed b8 these Rules&
Secti($ 4. Pri#ile%e0 c(77.$ic+ti($. 6 #he confidential character of a
pri)ileged communications is not solel8 on the ground that it is in the form
of an electronic document&
RULE 9
2EST EVIDECE RULE
Secti($ . Ori%i$+l () +$ electr($ic 0(c.7e$t. 6 $n electronic document
shall be regarded as the equi)alent of an original document under the ,est
E)idence Rule if it is a printout of output readable b8 sight or other means,
sho?n to reflect the date accuratel8&
Secti($ 3. C(5ie' +' e8.i#+le$t t( (ri%i$+l'.6 /hen a document is in t?o
or more copies e1ecuted at or about the same time ?ith identical contents, or
is a counterpart produced b8 the same impression as the original, or from
the same matri1, or b8 mechanical or electronic re-recording, or b8 chemical
reproduction, or b8 other equi)alent techniques ?hich is accuratel8
reproduces the original, such copies or duplicates shall be regarded as the
equi)alent of the original&
Not?ithstanding the foregoing, copies or duplicates shall not be admissible
to the same e1tent as the original if+
AaB a genuine question is raised as to the authenticit8 of the originalF
or
AbB in the circumstances it ?ould be un:ust or inequitable to admit a
cop8 in lieu of the original&
RULE 5
AUTHENTICATION OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
Secti($ . 2.r0e$ () 5r(#i$% +.the$ticit1. 6 #he person seeEing to
introduce an electronic document in an8 legal proceeding has the burden of
pro)ing its authenticit8 in the manner pro)ided in this Rule&
Secti($ 3. M+$$er () +.the$tic+ti($. 6 ,efore an8 pri)ate electronic
document offered as authentic is recei)ed in e)idence, its authenticit8 must
be pro)ed b8 an8 of the follo?ing means+
AaB b8 e)idence that it had been digitall8 signed b8 the person
purported to ha)e signed the sameF
AbB b8 e)idence that other appropriate securit8 procedures or de)ices
as ma8 be authoriDed b8 the Supreme %ourt or b8 la? for authentication of
electronic documents ?ere applied to the documentF or
AcB b8 other e)idence sho?ing its integrit8 and reliabilit8 to the
satisfaction of the :udge&
Secti($ 4. Pr(() () electr($ic+ll1 $(t+ri:e0 0(c.7e$t.6 $ document
electronicall8 notariDed in accordance ?ith the rules promulgated b8 the
Supreme %ourt shall be considered as a public document and pro)ed as a
notarial document under the Rules of %ourt&
RULE ;
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Secti($ . Electr($ic 'i%$+t.re. 6 $n electronic signature or a digital
signature authenticate the manner prescribed hereunder is admissible in
e)idence as the functional equi)alent of the signature of a person on a
?ritten document&
Secti($ 3. A.the$tic+ti($ () electr($ic 'i%$+t.re'. 6 $n electronic
signature ma8 be authenticate in an8 of the follo?ing manner+
AaB ,8 e)idence that a method or process ?as utiliDed to establish a
digital signature and )erif8 the sameF
AbB ,8 an8 other means pro)ided b8 la?F or
AcB ,8 an8 other means satisfactor8 to the :udge as establishing the
genuineness of the electronic signature&
Secti($ 4. Di'5.t+-le 5re'.75ti($' rel+ti($ t( electr($ic 'i%$+t.re. 6
.pon the authentication of an electronic signature, it shall be presumed
that+
AaB #he electronic signature is that of the person to ?hom it correlatesF
AbB #he electronic signature ?as affi1ed b8 that person ?ith the
intention of authenticating or appro)ing the electronic document to ?hich it
is related or to indicate such person@s consent to the transaction embodied
thereinF and
AcB#he methods or processes utiliDed to affi1 or )erif8 the electronic
signature operated ?ithout error or fault&
Secti($ 9. Di'5.t+-le 5re'.75ti($' rel+ti$% t( 0i%it+l 'i%$+t.re'. 6 .pon
the authentication of a digital signature, it shall be presumed, in addition to
those mentioned in the immediatel8 preceding section, that+
AaB #he information contained in a certificate is correctF
AbB #he digital signature ?as created during the operational period of
a certificateF
AcB #he message associated ?ith a digital signature has not been
altered from the time it ?as signedF and
AdB $ certificate had been issued b8 the certification authorit8
indicated therein&
RULE !
EVIDENTIARY <EIGHT OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
Secti($ . )+ct(r' )(r +''e''i$% e#i0e$ti+r1 =ei%ht. 6 n assessing the
e)identiar8 ?eight of an electronic document, the follo?ing factors ma8 be
considered+
AaB #he reliabilit8 of the manner or method in ?hich it ?as generated,
stored or communicated, including but not limited to input and output
procedures, controls, tests and checEs for accurac8 and reliabilit8 of the
electronic data message or document, in the light of all the circumstances as
?ell as an8 rele)ant agreementF
AbB #he reliabilit8 of the manner in ?hich its originator ?as identified&
AcB #he integrit8 of the information and communication s8stem in
?hich it is recorded or stored, including but not limited to the hard?are and
computer programs or soft?are used as ?ell as programming errorsF
AdB #he familiarit8 of the ?itness or the person ?ho made the entr8
?ith the use of communication and information s8stemF
AeB #he nature and qualit8 of the information ?hich ?ent into the
communication and information s8stem upon ?hich the electronic data
message or electronic document ?as basedF
AfB Other factors ?hich the court ma8 consider as affecting the
accurac8 or integrit8 of the electronic data message&
Secti($ 3. I$te%rit1 () +$ i$)(r7+ti($ +$0 c(77.$ic+ti($ '1'te7. 6 in
an8 dispute in)ol)ing the integrit8 of the information and communication
s8stem in ?hich an electronic document or electronic data message is
recorded or stored, the court ma8 consider, among others, the follo?ing
factors+
AaB /hether the information and communication s8stem or other
similar de)ice ?as operated in a manner that did not affect the integrit8 of
the electronic document, and there are no other reasonable grounds to doubt
the integrit8 of the information and communication s8stemF
AbB /hether the electronic document ?as recorded or stored b8 a
part8 to the proceedings ?ith interest ad)erse to that of the part8 using itF or
AcB /hether the electronic document ?as recorded or stored in the
usual or ordinar8 course of business b8 a person ?ho is not a part8 to the
proceedings and ?ho did not act under the control of the part8 using it&
RULE *
2USINESS RECORDS AS E>CEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Secti($ . I$+55lic+-ilit1 () the he+r'+1 r.le. 6 $ memorandum, report,
record or data compilation of acts, e)ents, conditions, opinions, or
diagnoses, made b8 b8 electronic, optical or other similar means at or near
the time of or from transmission or suppl8 of information b8 a person ?ith
Eno?ledge thereof, and Eept in the regular course or conduct of a business
acti)it8, and such ?as the regular practice to maEe the memorandum, report,
record, or data compilation b8 electronic, optical or similar means, all of
?hich are sho?n b8 the testimon8 of the custodian or other qualified
?itnesses, is e1pected from the rule on hearsa8 e)idence&
Secti($ 3. O#erc(7i$% the 5re'.75ti($. 6 #he presumption pro)ided for
in section 2 of this Rule ma8 be o)ercome b8 e)idence of the
untrust?orthiness of the source of information of the method or
circumstances of the preparation, transmission or storage thereof&
RULE ,
METHOD OF PROOF
Secti($ . A))i0+#it () e#i0e$ce.6 $ll matters relating to the admissibilit8
and e)identiar8 ?eight of an electronic document ma8 be established b8 an
affida)it stating facts of direct personal Eno?ledge of the affiant or based on
authentic records& #he affida)it must affirmati)el8 sho? the competence of
the affiant to testif8 on the matters contained therein&
Secti($ 3. Cr(''6e&+7i$+ti($ () 0e5($e$t. 6 #he affiant shall be made to
affirm the contents of the affida)it in open court and ma8 be cross-e1amined
as a matter of right b8 the ad)erse part8&
RULE /
E>AMINATION OF <ITNESSES
Secti($ . Electr($ic te'ti7($1. 6 $fter summaril8 hearing the parties
pursuant to Rule = of these Rules, the court ma8 authoriDe the presentation
of testimonial e)idence b8 electronic means& ,efore so authoriDing, the
court shall determine the necessit8 for such presentation and prescribe terms
and conditions as ma8 be necessar8 under the circumstance, including the
protection of the rights of the parties and ?itnesses concerned&
Secti($ 3. Tr+$'cri5t () electr($ic te'ti7($1. 6 /hen e1amination of a
?itness is done electronicall8, the entire proceedings, including the
questions and ans?ers, shall be transcribed b8 a stenographer, stenot8pes or
other recorder authoriDed for the purpose, ?ho shall certif8 as correct the
transcript done b8 him& #he transcript should reflect the fact that the
proceedings, either in ?hole or in part, had been electronicall8 recorded&
Secti($ 4. St(r+%e () electr($ic e#i0e$ce. 6 #he electronic e)idence and
recording thereof as ?ell as the stenographic notes shall form part of the
record of the case& Such transcript and recording shall be deemed prima
facie e)idence of such proceedings&
RULE
AUDIO? PHOTOGRAPHIC? VIDEO AND EPHEMERAL EVIDENCE
Secti($ . A.0i(? #i0e( +$0 'i7il+r e#i0e$ce. 6 $udio, photographic and
)ideo e)idence of e)ents, acts or transactions shall be admissible pro)ided it
shall be sho?n, presented or displa8ed to the court and shall be identified,
e1plained or authenticated b8 the person ?ho made the recording or b8
some other person competent to testif8 on the accurac8 thereof&
Secti($ 3. E5he7er+l electr($ic c(77.$ic+ti($. 6 Ephemeral electronic
communications shall be pro)en b8 the testimon8 of a person ?ho ?as a
part8 to the same or has personal Eno?ledge thereof& n the absence or
una)ailabilit8 of such ?itnesses, other competent e)idence ma8 be admitted&
$ recording of the telephone con)ersation or ephemeral electronic
communication shall be co)ered b8 the immediatel8 preceding section&
f the foregoing communications are recorded or embodied in an electronic
document, then the pro)isions of Rule < shall appl8&
RULE 3
EFFECTIVITY
Secti($ . A55lic+-ilit1 t( 5e$0i$% c+'e. 6 #hese Rules shall appl8 to cases
pending after their effecti)it8&
Secti($ 3. E))ecti#it1. 6 #hese Rules shall taEe effect on the first da8 of
$ugust 3((2 follo?ing their publication before the 3(
th
da8 of 7ul8 3((2 in
t?o ne?spapers of general circulation in the Philippines&

.ni)ersit8 of Eastern Philippines
.ni)ersit8 #o?n, Northern Samar
%ollege of La?
$pprenticeship Program
Summer 3(24
"ail8 Report of $cti)ities
"EP$R#MEN# O* 7.S#%E-%atarman
Ma8 23, 26, and 24, 3(24 No& of 0ours+ 2( hours
Nature of #asE Particulars
MAY 3? 3/9
Municipalit8 of Mondragon
,aranga8 %agmanaba
E1cerpts from the minutes to the regular session of the members of the
Sangguniang ,aranga8 of %agmanaba, Mondragon, Northern Samar held on
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 3(24 at the ,aranga8 0all&
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Presiding Officer
Present+ Signature+
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
$bsent+
RESOLUTION NO.@@@@@ S. () 3/9@@@@@@
RESOLUTION REAUESTING THE SANGGUNIANG 2AYAN MEM2ERS OF
THE MUNICIPALITY OF MONDRAGON? PROVINNCE OF NORTHERN
SAMAR FOR THE CONVERSION OF A PORTION OF TIM2ERLAND TO
AGRICULTURAL LAND
Presented for consideration of this bod8 is to pass resolution for the
appro)al of the con)ersion of a portion of timberland to agricultural land located in this
baranga8 as endorsed b8 the ,aranga8 "e)elopment %ouncil&
<HEREAS? Jaga?adIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII introduced to pass a
resolution to appro)e the proposed con)ersion of timberland into agricultural land of this
baranga8F
<HEREAS? after consideration and re)ie? of this Resolution , is found
to be in line ?ith the priorities of the baranga8 go)ernment and de)elopmentF
THEREFORE? on motion of Jaga?ad IIIIIIIIIIIIIII dul8 seconded
b8 Jaga?ad IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 2E IT RESOLVED? AS IT IS RESOLVED? to
appro)e and adopt this Resolution Requesting the Sangguniang ,a8an members of this
Municipalit8 for the %on)ersion of #imberland to $gricultural Land&
RESOLVED FURTHER? that copies of this resolution be for?arded to
the Municpal Ma8or and to the Sangguniang ,a8an members of the Municipalit8 of
Mondragon, Northern Samar for further appropriate action&
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
$ttested+
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Punong ,aranga8 ,rg8& Secretar8
Ma8 ', 5, and = 3(24 No& of hours+ 2( hours
N+t.re () T+'B P+rtic.l+r'

MAY !? 3/9"
5+(( am K arri)al at Public $ttorne8@s Office + /e ?ere gi)en instructions about the
confidentialit8 of cases and ?e ?ere
told that
Public $ttorne8@s Office is for the
indigent
generall8 for the accused in criminal
cases&
$nd in ci)il cases, Public $ttorne8@s
Office
can ser)e both plaintiff and accused&
/e ?ere instructed to read the booE on
%odes
and References for the Public
$ttorne8@s
Office&
$ssigned to maEe a complaint for
.nla?ful
"etainer filed b8 one #omasa
Pedamato
against Marlon %ubalan&
22+6( am K lunch time + Off to home&
MAY *? 3/9"
5+(( am K arri)al at Public $ttorne8@s Office + #he group ?as not able to ?orE due to
po?er interruption&

22+6( am K lunch time + Off to home&
MAY ,? 3/9"
5+(( am K arri)al at Public $ttorne8@s Office + Submission of the complaint to $tt8&
Ramiro $lDate for .nla?ful "etainer&
$ssisted clients in maEing affida)its&
$tt8& 7inE8 .& Ramos assigned the
group to
maEe a 7udicial $ffida)it of one Leslie
de !uia RomineD&
22+(( am lunch time + Off to home&
hereb8 certif8 the correctness of the foregoing report&
7OSEP0NE L& ESP$NO
LL,-
Noted+
ATTY. NATALIO C. ADRIATICO
"istrict Public $ttorne8

5
th
7udicial Region
2(
th
Municipal %ircuit #rial %ourt
%atarman-Lope de Vega
%atarman, Northern Samar
REPORT OF GRADES
Sub:ect+ $pprenticeship
%lass "+ (<6(<C2
%ourse "escription+ $pprenticeship
%redits+ < units
5
th
Mondragon-San Roque
SERVICE RECORD
NAME" @@@@ESPANO JOSEPHINE
LUCINDO@@@@@
ASurnameB ANameB AM&&B
2IRTHDATE" @@@@@@@Dece7-er 3!? ,!; M($0r+%($? N.
S+7+r@@
A"ateB APlaceB

#his is to certif8 that the emplo8ee named herein abo)e actuall8
rendered ser)ice in this Office as sho?n b8 the ser)ice record belo?&
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@
SERVICE DESIGNATION STATUS SALARY
Anclusi)e "atesB
$pril 6, 3((6 to %ourt Stenographer Permanent
Php2<,654&((
present
NO#0N! *OLLO/S
%ER#*E" %ORRE%#+
M$RE##$ L& "E LEON
%lerE of %ourt
7ul8 ', 3(24
"ate

Epin

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Epin

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

You might also like