Maternal education, communication style, gender and birth order are known to influence children's expressive vocabulary and reading habits. Mothers' perception of ability to communicate was measured by a scale constructed ad hoc from the International Child Development Programmes. Good communication, low maternal age, female gender and frequent reading were significantly associated with expressive vocabulary. Reading at least 6 times / week added more than 0. SD in vocabulary regardless of gender and communication.
Original Description:
Original Title
287Expressive Vocabulary in 18-Month-old Children in Relation to Demographic Factors, Mother and Child Characteristic[1]
Maternal education, communication style, gender and birth order are known to influence children's expressive vocabulary and reading habits. Mothers' perception of ability to communicate was measured by a scale constructed ad hoc from the International Child Development Programmes. Good communication, low maternal age, female gender and frequent reading were significantly associated with expressive vocabulary. Reading at least 6 times / week added more than 0. SD in vocabulary regardless of gender and communication.
Maternal education, communication style, gender and birth order are known to influence children's expressive vocabulary and reading habits. Mothers' perception of ability to communicate was measured by a scale constructed ad hoc from the International Child Development Programmes. Good communication, low maternal age, female gender and frequent reading were significantly associated with expressive vocabulary. Reading at least 6 times / week added more than 0. SD in vocabulary regardless of gender and communication.
child characteristics, communication style and shared reading M. Westerlund* and D. Lagerberg* *Department of Womens and Childrens Health, Section for Paediatrics, Uppsala University, Childrens Hospital, and Central Unit for Child Health Care, Childrens Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden Accepted for publication 2 September 2007 Keywords communication, expressive vocabulary, maternal report, reading, screening Correspondence: Monica Westerlund, Assistant Professor, Central unit for child health care, Uppsala county, Childrens Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail: monica.westerlund@ akademiska.se Abstract Background Previous research has elucidated the associations between childrens language development and reading habits, and maternal education, communication style, gender and birth order. Research including maternal age and child temperament is more scarce. We studied the associations of all these factors with childrens expressive vocabulary and reading habits. We also analysed the relationships of reading with expressive vocabulary, and effect sizes associated with frequent reading. Methods Questionnaires were completed by mothers of 1091 children aged 1719 months visiting the Swedish Child Health Services. Expressive vocabulary was assessed by the Swedish Communication Screening at 18 months, a screening version of McArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Mothers perception of ability to communicate was measured by a scale constructed ad hoc from the International Child Development Programmes, a parent education curriculum. Bates difcultness scale was used to assess temperament. Results Good communication, low maternal age, female gender and frequent reading were signicantly associated with expressive vocabulary. High maternal education, good communication, higher maternal age, female gender and being a rst-born child were signicantly associated with frequent reading. Reading at least 6 times/week added more than 0.3 SD in vocabulary regardless of gender and communication. Conclusions The ndings support the importance of reading and communication quality to early language development. Knowledge of the relationship between childrens vocabulary and book reading in a context of joint attention is both theoretically and practically valuable to speech and language pathologists, pre-school teachers, child health workers and other professionals. Introduction Our present society makes heavy demands on the linguistic ability of the population, both native and immigrant. Poor mas- tering of a countrys majority language is a great psychosocial disadvantage not solely for children growing up with a minority language. Young children are strongly programmed for com- munication. It is important to make the most of this and of the Original Article doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00801.x 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 257 plasticity of the young human brain indicating a high learning potential in the early years of life. Some maternal factors related to child language Many studies have elucidated the strong link between socio- economic status (SES) and childrens verbal abilities (e.g. Born- stein et al. 1998; Hoff-Ginsberg 1998; Locke et al. 2002). Core factors often applied in denitions of SES are education, occu- pation and income. As for early language development, the most inuential SES component seems to be education, particularly maternal education, as the mother tends to be intensively involved in daily interactions offering rich opportunities for conversation. The importance of SES appears to be mediated by commu- nication style (Bornstein et al. 1998; Landry et al. 2002; Hoff & Tian 2005), e.g. the amount and complexity of verbal commu- nication available to the child (Hart & Risley 1995). Inviting the child to take part in conversations, describing and explaining what is around are activities likely to expand concept formation and linguistic capacity (Manolson 1992; Girolametto et al. 1999). Low-SES mothers have been found to approach their children with many directives not linked to the childs current interest, as well as with requests calling for an expected response (Hoff-Ginsberg 1991). According to Landry and colleagues (2002), they may also use so-called empty language (this and that instead of more specic language). Maternal age can be hypothesized to inuence childs lan- guage directly, perhaps because older mothers may be more patient and talk more with their children, or because, con- versely, they are more tired than younger mothers, thus talking less with them. Pan and colleagues (2004) found no signicant associations of maternal age with child language at age 2. However, this study involved low-income families only, which may have restricted the potential scope for variations by mater- nal age. Some child factors related to language Girls language development is usually ahead of boys (e.g. Bornstein & Haynes 1998; Locke et al. 2002). A slight female advantage explaining between 1% and 3% of the variance was reported from two large-scale studies of children aged 830 months (Fenson et al. 1994; Galsworthy et al. 2000). A Swedish study of more than 1000 children showed signicant differences in favour of girls verbal comprehension and pro- duction (Berglund et al. 2005). First-born children are usually verbally ahead of later-born children at least in the early years (Fenson et al. 1994; Hoff-Ginsberg 1998; Berglund et al. 2005). The association is explained as being mediated by the mothers way of talking to their children. Mothers of rst-borns have been found to make more explicit attempts at eliciting language from their toddlers than mothers of later-born children (Jones & Adamson 1987). Few studies have addressed specic associations between language development and childrens temperament. However, according to Dixon and Smith (2000), mothers ratings of their toddlers attention were related to language production. This was later veried in a study by Karrass and colleagues (2002). Some factors related to book reading with young children As pointed out by Scarborough and Dobrich (1994), children from lower-class families are usually read to less often than children from higher-SES families (Bornstein et al. 1998; Hoff- Ginsberg 1998; Locke et al. 2002). However, Roberts and col- leagues (2005) maintained that mothers education was only mildly correlated with frequency of shared reading, and Kuo and colleagues (2004) found indications of low reading fre- quencies even in better-off families. Communication style is probably related to reading prefer- ences in families of young children. Shared reading may be a marker of a generally stimulating environment (Karrass et al. 2003). If so, parents most disposed to attend to their childrens verbal and non-verbal signals in settings other than reading would also be the ones most inclined to read frequently with them. As far as is known by the authors, no study has explored a possible association between mothers age and shared reading. However, an association might be hypothesized between paren- tal views of the importance of linguistic stimulation and mater- nal age. Provided that girls are linguistically ahead of boys, and parents modify their reading habits to the childs verbal ability, then one could expect mothers to read more with their daugh- ters. However, according to some studies, reading with young children does not differ between the genders (High et al. 1999; Roberts et al. 2005). As to birth order, Kuo and colleagues (2004) found differing odds for daily reading depending on whether the child was an only child or not. Children with siblings were read to more seldom. The relation between child temperament (attention) and book reading has been studied by Karrass and colleagues (2003) in middle-class families with 8-month-old children. No associa- 258 M. Westerlund and D. Lagerberg 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 tion was found between mothers book reading and the childs temperament, whereas fathers read more with their fussy chil- dren than with their quiet ones. Shared reading and language development Already in the late eighties, Whitehurst and colleagues (1988) showed book reading to be associated with an increased vocabulary in children. Since then, several researchers have highlighted the importance of shared reading with young children (Golova et al. 1999; High et al. 2000; Whitehurst & Lonigan 2001). In the light of growing evidence that parent child reading activities represent a particularly rich source of verbal interactions (e.g. Hoff-Ginsberg 1991), several book- giving projects have been implemented (for a review, see Klass et al. 2003), some of which have been subject of evaluation studies. High and colleagues (2000) found signicant increases in both receptive and expressive language for children of 18 months and older, whose parents had received childrens books, educational materials and advice about sharing books. Hoff-Ginsberg (1991) studied mothers and their 1829- month-old toddlers in four settings (mealtime, dressing, reading and toy play). Differences between the less contingent speech among lower-class mothers compared with that of middle-class mothers were considerably minimized in the reading situation. These ndings stress the importance of reading as a means to language acquisition. Even if communication and reading habits work very much in the same direction, it may nevertheless be the case that both make independent contributions to childrens language devel- opment. This matter, among others, will be dealt with in the following. Methods Aims of the study The present study examined cross-sectional associations with expressive vocabulary and with reading habits of the following factors: maternal education (as a marker of SES), communi- cation style, maternal age, child gender, birth order and difcultness (as an aspect of temperament). The association of reading habits with childrens language development was also explored. Participants This paper drew on data from an extensive study of two cohorts of children (born September 2000August 2001 and April 2003March 2004) who visited their Child Health Centres (CHC), situated in six different counties of Sweden, for an 18-month check-up (Sundelin et al. 2005). Of 2179 children invited to participate, the mothers of 1541 (70.7%) completed the questionnaire. Twins (n = 48) and chil- dren outside the age range of 18 1 month were excluded. The study population thus consisted of 1091 children (17 months n = 66, 18 months n = 625 and 19 months n = 400). There were 546 boys and 545 girls, of whom 45.9% were rst-born children. As participation in Swedish child health services is almost 100% (Magnusson 1997), the study can be considered population-based. Swedish mothers dominated the material (84%). All mothers, irrespectively of national origin, were included. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the universities involved (Dnr Ups 01342). Procedure and questionnaire When visiting the CHCs for their childrens 18-month check- up, the mothers were invited to participate. Upon acceptance, they were given a questionnaire and a post-free return enve- lope. Help by interpreters was offered to non-Swedish- speaking mothers. The questionnaire included, among others, questions about demographic characteristics, reading with the child and the mothers perception of the childs temperament. The mothers were also asked to rate the quality of their communication with the child as well as the childs current vocabulary. Description of variables Maternal education (four categories, ordinal scale): primary school or lower, 2 years of secondary school, 34 years of sec- ondary school and university/college. Mothers communication: the scale was constructed ad hoc on the basis of themes from the International Child Develop- ment Programmes, a parent education curriculum(Hundeide 1996). Items: To what extent do you think you are good enough to: be aware of the childs needs and wishes; communicate with the child about things that catch his/her interest; encourage the child; help the child to give attention to things and events around; describe to the child what you experience together; explain to the child what you experience together? There were ve scores: 1 (very little), 2 (rather little), 3 (moderately), 4 (rather much) and 5 (very much). Total score was calculated Expressive vocabulary in 18-month-old children 259 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 as the means of all items. Scale dimensionality was good (Cronbachs alpha: 0.92). Dichotomized into high (>mean for whole sample) and low (mean) for bivariate analyses and calculations of effect sizes; continuous variable in multiple regression analyses. Maternal age (year of birth) when completing the question- naire (ve categories for univariate and bivariate analyses; continuous variable in multiple regression analyses). The childs gender and birth order dichotomized into male/ female and rst-born or not. The childs difcultness according to Bates (Bates et al. 1979): mothers mean score on nine items ranging from 1 (low dif- cultness) to 7 (high difcultness). The mother is encouraged to compare her child with an imagined average child. Items deal with easinessdifculty to calm the child, irritability, crying, temper, etc. Scale dimensionality was good (Cron- bachs alpha: 0.83). Dichotomized into low (<mean for whole sample) and high (mean) for bivariate analyses; continuous variable in multiple regression analyses. Shared book reading (ve categories, ordinal scale): How many times, per week, do you or someone else in the family look in a book together with your child (10 or more times, 69 times, 35 times, 12 times, or never)? Dichotomized into <6 times/ week and 6 times/week for some bivariate analyses (Table 4) and for calculations of effect sizes. The childs expressive vocabulary (continuous variable): Number of spoken words marked by the mother on a check- list of 90 common words. This instrument, SCS18, is a screen- ing version of the Swedish Communicative Development Inventories (Eriksson & Berglund 1999; Berglund & Eriksson 2000), which in turn is a Swedish adaptation of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (Fenson et al. 1993). The psychometric properties of the Swedish screening version (SCS18) have been analysed, showing high internal consistency, high testretest reliability and strong associations with the corresponding scores from the complete Swedish battery (for details and a verbatim English translation of the questionnaire, see Eriksson et al. 2002). Statistical analyses and methods When there were missing values in a particular variable, the child in question was excluded from the analyses. n values thus varied and amounted to between 1039 and 1083 (out of totally 1091). Differences between percentages were signicance tested with the c 2 method, and differences between means with the analysis of variance (anova) procedure and Students t-test. To control for independent variables, multiple linear regression analyses with standardized beta weights were performed. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohens d with weighted SDs. Effect sizes are intended to express clinical relevance, with 1 corre- sponding to one standard deviation. An effect of 0.8 is generally considered large, an effect size of 0.5 as medium and a size of 0.2 as small (Kirk 1996). Analyses were performed with the SAS package for personal computers (SAS Institute Inc. 1987). P-values below 0.05 were accepted as signicant. Results The accuracy of the verbal checklist method was supported by the ndings, showing an almost perfect gradient by age. Thus the mean number and maximum of spoken words were 25.2 and 76, respectively, in the youngest children (17 months), 28.3 and 84 in the 18-month olds, and 31.7 and 87 in the oldest group (19 months). Means, SDs and frequencies are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Mothers were quite satised with their communication with the child: the average score exceeded 4 corresponding to rather much. Child difcultness lay in the middle of the scale corre- sponding to an average child. The mean number of words expressed by the children was 29 out of the 90 words of the SCS18. As shown in Table 2, 105 mothers (9.6%) were low- educated at most, nished primary school whereas more than 2/5 had a college or university education. Frequent reading (6 times/week) was reported for 65.9% of the children, whereas 14.4% were read to more seldom (02 times/week). About 15% of the mothers were below 25 or above 39 years of age. Tables 3 and 4 show bivariate relationships between the inde- pendent variables maternal education, communication, mater- nal age, child gender, child birth order and child difcultness, and the dependent variables expressive vocabulary (Table 3) and shared reading (Table 4). In Table 3, shared reading has been added among the independent variables, thus displaying its association with vocabulary. Table 1. Means (M), standard deviations (SD) and ranges for communication, child difcultness and expressive vocabulary Variable n* M SD Range Communication 1077 4.15 0.64 1.005.00 Difcultness 1089 3.55 0.83 1.006.33 Expressive vocabulary 1067 29.4 20.5 087 Total n = 1091. *Varying ns are due to missing values. High scores are favourable. Low scores are favourable. 260 M. Westerlund and D. Lagerberg 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 There was no signicant association between maternal edu- cation and child vocabulary (Table 3). On the other hand, there was a steep and highly signicant increase in reading frequency with rising maternal education (Table 4). Children whose mothers felt they communicated well with them had a signi- cantly larger expressive vocabulary and participated signi- cantly more in reading than other children. The same was true for girls and rst-born children as related to boys and later- borns respectively. There were no signicant associations for either vocabulary or frequent reading with child difcultness. Frequent reading was strongly and signicantly related to expressive vocabulary (Table 3). Multiple linear regression analyses Table 5 shows the results of a multiple linear regression analysis with expressive vocabulary as the dependent variable. Both genders were pooled together. The model explained 12.91% of the variance (d.f. = 7, F = 22.98, P < 0.0001). The most important factor was the childs gender (girl), followed by shared reading (frequent) and perceived communication (good) (all P-values < 0.0001). There was also a signicant but weaker contribution by maternal age (low, P = 0.0052). Maternal education, birth order and child difcultness did not contribute signicantly to expressive vocabulary, controlling for other independent variables. The signicant association from the bivariate analysis with birth order thus disappeared, and a signicant association with maternal age emerged when this variable was entered as a con- tinuous scale. Repeating the analysis for boys and girls sepa- rately, the same variables yielded signicant associations, except for the association with maternal age in girls. The model explained 9.65% of the variance among boys, and 5.44% of the variance among girls (data not shown). The results of a multiple linear regression analysis using shared reading as the dependent variable are shown in Table 6 with both genders pooled together. The model explained 16.88% of the variance (d.f. = 6, F = 36.88, P < 0.0001). The strongest association, controlling for other variables, appeared for communication: mothers who perceived their communicative capacity to be good tended to read more with their children. Children of highly educated mothers and rst-born children participated more in shared reading. There was a positive signicant association between reading and maternal age as a continuous variable (all P-values < 0.0001). Finally, the signicant association with gender (girls) remained after controlling for other indepen- dent variables (P = 0.0006). Analysing boys and girls sepa- rately, the same independent variables as for the two genders pooled together showed signicant associations with reading. The model explained 17.01% of the variance among boys and 15.49% of the variance among girls (data not shown). Effect sizes In order to convey an idea of the potential impact of reading on expressive vocabulary, given variations in gender and perceived communication, effect sizes are presented in Table 7. Effect size should be interpreted as the proportion of one SD added to expressive vocabulary by frequent book reading, i.e. at least 6 times/week. Boys whose mothers judged their communication as less than good and who were not frequently read to reached a mean of 17.8 words, to be compared with 23.8 for comparable boys who were frequently read to, a difference of 0.35 SD. Girls with a good communication had an expressive vocabulary of 31.6 words if they participated less frequently in shared reading, and 38.2 words if they were read to 6 times per week or more (0.32 SD). In general, frequent reading was associated with a gain in expressive vocabulary of about 0.4 SD (an Table 2. Frequencies for maternal education, maternal age, child gender, child birth order and shared reading Independent variable n % Maternal education Primary or less 105 9.6 Secondary: 2 years 188 17.2 Secondary: 3 or 4 years 313 28.7 College or university 476 43.6 Information missing 9 0.8 Maternal age 1824 84 7.7 2529 255 23.4 3034 396 36.3 3539 270 24.7 4048 79 7.2 Information missing 7 0.6 Child gender Boys 546 50.0 Girls 545 50.0 Child birth order First-born 501 45.9 Later-born 590 54.1 Shared reading 10 or more times/week 464 42.5 69 times/week 255 23.4 35 times/week 207 19.0 12 times/week 133 12.2 Never 24 2.2 Information missing 8 0.7 Total 1091 100 Expressive vocabulary in 18-month-old children 261 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 almost medium effect size). The largest increases occurred for boys with a good communication and for girls with a less than good communication. Discussion Main ndings Good communication quality, low maternal age, female gender and frequent reading were signicantly and independently associated with childrens expressive vocabulary. High maternal education, good communication quality, higher maternal age, female gender and being a rst-born child was signicantly and independently associated with frequent reading. Reading at least 6 times/week added more than 0.3 SD in vocabulary, regardless of gender and communication. Child difcultness showed no associations with either vocabulary or reading. Comments In line with some earlier studies (Pan et al. 2004; Berglund et al. 2005), but contrary to international studies of somewhat older children (Hoff-Ginsberg 1998; High et al. 2000), there were no signicant differences in vocabulary between children of higher- and lower-educated mothers. The association between SES and vocabulary gets stronger in course of time (e.g. Hoff-Ginsberg 1998; Landry et al. 2002), and the children studied here were only 1719 months old. Another possible explanation could lie in the relatively equal social conditions in Sweden. Furthermore, according to other data from our extensive study, higher-educated mothers found their total workload to be heavier and their tasks more conicting than lower-eduacted mothers did, possibly resulting in reduced opportunities for conversation. Highly educated mothers may cultivate more demanding attitudes, both with regard to their Table 3. Expressive vocabulary by maternal education, communication, maternal age, child gender, child birth order, child difcultness and shared reading. Independent variable Dependent variable: expressive vocabulary n Mean SD Range P Maternal education (d.f. = 3) 0.1628 Primary or less 103 26.8 21.8 080 Secondary: 2 years 185 29.8 20.9 086 Secondary: 3 or 4 years 306 31.4 20.4 084 College or university 465 28.6 20.0 087 Communication* <0.0001 Score >mean 555 32.2 20.5 087 Score mean 500 26.1 19.8 084 Maternal age (d.f. = 4) 0.1501 1824 83 32.3 21.3 079 2529 250 31.2 20.5 086 3034 388 28.8 19.7 085 3539 263 27.3 21.4 084 4048 76 29.1 20.0 287 Child gender <0.0001 Boys 533 24.3 18.7 086 Girls 534 34.4 20.9 087 Child birth order 0.0021 First-born 493 31.4 20.8 086 Later-born 574 27.6 20.1 087 Child difcultness 0.0934 Score <mean 495 30.5 20.9 087 Score mean 571 28.4 20.1 086 Shared reading (d.f. = 4) <0.0001 10 or more times/week 452 34.3 21.1 087 69 times/week 252 29.3 19.5 086 35 times/week 205 24.6 18.8 085 12 times/week 130 22.0 17.9 080 Never 22 14.0 14.4 064 Total 1067 29.4 20.5 087 Signicance tests by analysis of variance and Students t-test. Observations with missing values excluded. *High scores are favourable. Low scores are favourable. 262 M. Westerlund and D. Lagerberg 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 childrens vocabulary and to the correctness of their own assessments. The SES in terms of maternal education turned out to be closely associated with reading frequency. This was not quite in line with the results of Kuo and colleagues (2004), who found that even among less underprivileged families, reading with young children was rather infrequent. Mothers communication showed the strongest association with shared reading. Karrass and colleagues (2003) have specu- lated that mothers with a good communication also are the ones most frequently reading to their children. This hypothesis was supported by our ndings. To our knowledge, our study is the only one analysing a possible connection between mothers age and frequent reading with children. The proportion frequently read to reached a peak in maternal age group 3034, after which it re-declined (Table 4, not signicant). When entered as a con- tinuous variable in the multiple regression analysis, however, maternal age resulted in a signicant positive association with reading (Table 6). Table 4. Shared reading by maternal education, communication, maternal age, child gender, child birth order and child difcultness Independent variable Dependent variable: shared reading n <6 times/week 6 times/week P Maternal education (d.f. = 3) <0.0001 Primary or less 103 57.3 42.7 Secondary: 2 years 186 37.6 62.4 Secondary: 3 or 4 years 310 38.4 61.6 College or university 476 23.3 76.7 Communication (d.f. = 1)* <0.0001 Score >mean 569 24.4 75.6 Score mean 506 43.5 56.5 Maternal age (d.f. = 4) 0.2035 1824 82 37.8 62.2 2529 251 37.8 62.2 3034 396 29.5 70.5 3539 269 33.5 66.5 4048 79 36.7 63.3 Child gender (d.f. = 1) 0.0033 Boys 542 37.8 62.2 Girls 541 29.4 70.6 Child birth order (d.f. = 1) <0.0001 First-born 497 23.5 76.5 Later-born 586 42.2 57.8 Child difcultness (d.f. = 1) 0.7420 Score <mean 504 33.1 66.9 Score mean 578 34.1 65.9 Total 1083 33.6 66.4 Signicance tests by c 2 . Observations with missing values excluded. *High scores are favourable. Low scores are favourable. Table 5. Multiple regression analysis with expressive vocabulary as the dependent variable Independent variable Parameter estimate Standard error Standardized estimate (b) t value Pr > t Intercept 3.47395 6.76897 0 0.51 0.6079 Maternal education -0.41864 0.62275 -0.02048 -0.67 0.5016 Communication 4.69543 1.00254 0.14635 4.68 <0.0001 Maternal age -0.36580 0.13048 -0.09346 -2.80 0.0052 Child gender 9.05455 1.19637 0.22177 7.57 <0.0001 Child birth order -1.10198 1.38998 -0.02692 -0.79 0.4281 Child difcultness 0.37965 0.74420 0.01533 0.51 0.6101 Shared reading 3.57932 0.57869 0.19639 6.19 <0.0001 Both genders pooled together. n = 1039. Adjusted R 2 = 0.1291, d.f. = 7, F = 22.98, P < 0.0001. Expressive vocabulary in 18-month-old children 263 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 Contrary to the associationbetweenage and frequent reading, the relationbetweenmaternal age and expressive vocabulary was negative: younger mothers, who apparently read less with their children, reported more words spoken by their children. The explanation given by the regression analyses lies in the fact that reading produced an additional contribution to word produc- tion after controlling for maternal age and other independent variables. It remains to be explained why the associationbetween child vocabulary and maternal age was negative, contrary to ndings reported by Pan and colleagues (2004). Mothers in their study were younger, however, than those included in our present sample (mean 23 years vs. 32 years). Younger mothers might be more eager to feel proud of their children and may energetically search for signs of progress in their offspring. Contrary to the ndings of High and colleagues (1999), Karrass and colleagues (2003), and Roberts and colleagues (2005), we found girls to be signicantly more involved in reading than boys (Tables 4 & 6). This does not appear to have been shown in earlier research. A nding contrary to earlier studies (Hoff-Ginsberg 1998; Berglund et al. 2005) was the non-signicant difference in vocabulary between rst- and later-born children in the present study when controlling for other independent variables (Table 5). Apparently, the difference was explained by these other factors. Methodological considerations It remains a matter of concern that the background and outcome variables were not independent, all data being col- lected by maternal self-report. Self-report bias cannot be excluded. If, for instance, mothers who reported frequent shared reading also tended to overestimate systematically the quality of their communication with the children, the strong association between communication and reading would be largely spuri- ous, as would the relation between communiction and vocabu- lary. We have had no possibility, in the present study, to safeguard against this. On the other hand, certain variables were of a hard kind that should not cause great concern about reliability, i.e. year of birth, education, gender andbirthorder. Furthermore, the difcultness scale applied is a well-tried and widely used instrument. The SCS18 has shown good psychometric properties. The commu- nication instrument, it is true, was developed ad hoc Table 6. Multiple regression analysis with shared reading as the dependent variable Independent variable Parameter estimate Standard error Standardized estimate (b) t value Pr > t Intercept 0.28618 0.35867 0 0.80 0.4251 Maternal education 0.22957 0.03254 0.20299 7.05 <0.0001 Communication 0.42597 0.05182 0.24125 8.22 <0.0001 Maternal age 0.02756 0.00688 0.12733 4.00 <0.0001 Child gender 0.21939 0.06348 0.09734 3.46 0.0006 Child birth order 0.44216 0.07264 0.19559 6.09 <0.0001 Child difcultness -0.00458 0.03959 -0.00335 -0.12 0.9080 Both genders pooled together. n = 1061. Adjusted R 2 = 0.1688, d.f. = 6, F = 36.88, P < 0.0001. Table 7. Mean sizes of expressive vocabulary for combinations of child gender and mothers perceived communication, given that shared reading did or did not occur six or more times/week Child gender and mothers perceived communication Shared reading <6 times/week Shared reading 6 times/week t P Effect size* n Mean n Mean Boys Communication less than good, mean 114 17.8 132 23.8 -2.72 0.0071 0.35 Communication good, >mean 83 21.4 198 30.0 -3.84 0.0002 0.46 Girls Communication less than good, mean 102 25.6 150 35.2 -3.65 0.0003 0.47 Communication good, >mean 53 31.6 221 38.2 -2.12 0.0350 0.32 Effect sizes calculated as Cohens d with weighted SDs. Effect size 1 = one SD. Total n = boys: 546, girls: 545 (38 observations with missing values excluded). *0.8 large, 0.5 medium and 0.2 small. 264 M. Westerlund and D. Lagerberg 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 but showed a high alpha value (0.92). The variable measuring shared reading has not been tested as to reliability or validity and could be inaccurate. This is a shortcoming of the present study, but one that could hardly have been avoided, as it seems. The present sample included a certain proportion of immigrant families. We cannot tell whether these mothers understood the SCS18 in the same way as Swedish mothers did. As pointed out by Kaplan and Bennett (2003), analyses based on ethnicity may not always be relevant to the question under study. In the case of linguistic matters, however, this does not seem to be true. Families stemming from other cultures may have different reading and conversation habits from those of the majority population, differences possibly inuencing our results in uncontrolled ways. The proportion of immigrants was rather small, however, and it was not feasible to make further classications by ethnicity. It must be stressed that the present cross-sectional study did not permit conclusions about causes and effects. For instance, it was found that girls were more often read to and had a more advanced vocabulary than boys. Whether this was because of frequent reading or whether mothers read more to girls because of their richer vocabulary cannot be determined. In the same vein, the termeffect size should not be taken to imply any effect proper, but is used here for convenience, being an established expression. The proportion of the variance explained by the regression analyses amounted to no more than 13% for expressive vocabu- lary and 17% for shared reading. Proportions of these magni- tudes are not uncommon in social research. However, explained variances of the sizes found may be quite considerable if viewed from a public health perspective. Even small improvements of only a few per cent in reading and vocabulary may be very substantial at the population level. Conclusions The paramount ndings of this study were the strong associa- tions of communication quality with both expressive vocabu- lary and reading frequency, and of reading frequency with vocabulary in addition to the contribution of communica- tion. Contrary to age, education, gender and birth order, reading and communication style are open to inuence and change. Parents of young children are highly motivated to receive information that may benet their childs development. Stimulating parents to observe, comment upon and encourage the childs talking as well as reading together appears to be a highly relevant task for speech pathologists and professionals in educational settings, healthcare services and other activities reaching parents and children. While awaiting more studies to establish a causal relationship, we still wish to emphasize the importance of our ndings. Good communication and frequent reading give fuel to childrens language development, emergent literacy and later reading skill. Acknowledgements The study was supported by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, the county council of Uppsala, the Gillberg Foundation and Allmnna Barnhuset. Sincere thanks are due to all experiment and control nurses for their interest in the study andfor their generous contributionintime andefforts. References Bates, J. E., Freeland, C. A. B. & Lounsbury, M. L. (1979) Measurement of infant difcultness. Child Development, 50, 794803. Berglund, E. & Eriksson, M. (2000) Communicative development in Swedish children 1628 months old: the Swedish early communicative development inventory words and sentences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 133144. Berglund, E., Eriksson, M. & Westerlund, M. (2005) Communicative skills in relation to gender, birth order, childcare and socioeconomic status in 18-month-old children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychololgy, 46, 485491. Bornstein, M. H. & Haynes, O. M. (1998) Vocabulary competence in early childhood: measurement, latent construct, and predictive validity. Child Development, 69, 654671. Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, O. M. & Painter, K. M. (1998) Sources of child vocabulary competence: a multivariate model. Journal of Child Language, 25, 367393. Dixon, W. E. Jr & Smith, P. H. (2000) Links between early temperament and language acquisition. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 46, 417440. Key messages Contrary to demographic factors, communication and reading can be inuenced and improved in parents of young children. Even if the variance in vocabulary explained by reading habits was not large, a few per cents improvement would be of high importance on the population level. More research is needed to establish the causal paths by which reading is linked to language development. In the meantime, we strongly recommend organizations working with parents and children to develop methods for encouraging parents to communicate positively with their children and introduce them at an early age to the fascinating world of books. Expressive vocabulary in 18-month-old children 265 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266 Eriksson, M. & Berglund, E. (1999) Swedish early communicative development inventories: words and gestures. First Language, 19, 5590. Eriksson, M., Westerlund, M. & Berglund, E. (2002) A screening version of the Swedish communicative development inventories designed for use with 18-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 948960. Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D. J., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. (1993) The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Users Guide and Technical Manual. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA, USA. Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994) Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1189. Galsworthy, M., Dionne, G., Dale, P. & Plomin, R. (2000) Sex differences in early verbal and non-verbal cognitive development. Developmental Science, 3, 206215. Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., Wiigs, M. & Steig Pearce, P. (1999) The relationship between maternal language measure and language development in toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 8, 364374. Golova, N., Alario, A., Viver, P., Rodriguez, M. & High, P. (1999) Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 5, 993997. Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995) Intervention to equalize early experience. In: Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children (eds B. Hart & T.R. Risley), pp. 191219. Paul H. Bookers Publishing Co, Baltimore, MD, USA. High, P., Hopmann, M., LaGasse, L., Sege, R., Moran, J., Guiterrez, C. & Becker, S. (1999) Child centered literacy orientation: a form of social capital? Pediatrics, 103: e55. High, P., LaGasse, L., Becker, S., Ahlgren, I. & Gardner, A. (2000) Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference? Pediatrics, 105, 927934. Hoff, E. & Tian, C. (2005) Socioeconomic status and cultural inuences on language. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 271278. Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1991) Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62, 782796. Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998) The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to childrens language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 603629. Hundeide, K. (1996) Ledet Samspill: Hndbok til ICDPS Sensitiviseringsprogram [Guided Interaction: Manual of the ICDPs Sensitivity Program]. International Child Development Programs. Vett & Viten, Nesbru, Norway. Jones, C. P. & Adamson, L. B. (1987) Language use in motherchild and motherchildsibling interactions. Child Development, 58, 356366. Kaplan, J. B. & Bennett, T. (2003) Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication. Journal of American Medical Association, 289, 27092716. Karrass, J., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., Mullins, J. & Burke Lefever, J. (2002) Processes in language acquisition: the role of gender, attention, and maternal encouragement of attention over time. Journal of Child Language, 29, 519543. Karrass, J., VanDeventer, M. C. & Braungart-Rieker, J. M. (2003) Predicting shared parent-child book reading in infancy. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 134146. Kirk, R. E. (1996) Practical signicance: a concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746759. Klass, P. E., Needlman, R. & Zuckerman, B. (2003) The developing brain and early learning. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88, 651654. Kuo, A. A., Franke, T. M., Regalado, M. & Halfon, N. (2004) Parent report of reading to young children. Pediatrics, 113, 19441951. Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E. & Swank, P. R. (2002) Environmental effects on language development in normal and high-risk child populations. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 9, 192200. Locke, A., Ginsborg, J. & Peers, I. (2002) Development and disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 315. Magnusson, M. (1997) Rationality of routine health examinations by physicians of 18-month-old children: experiences based on data from a Swedish county. Acta Paediatrica, 86, 881887. Manolson, A. (1992) It Takes Two to Talk. A Parents Guide to Helping Children to Communicate. The Hanen Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Spier, E. & Tamis-Lemonda, C. (2004) Measuring productive vocabulary of toddlers in low-income families: concurrent and predictive validity of three sources of data. Journal of Child Language, 31, 587608. Roberts, J., Jurgens, J. & Burchinal, M. (2005) The role of home literacy practices in preschool childrens language and emergent literacy skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 345359. SAS Institute Inc. (1987) SAS/STAT IM Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1987. Scarborough, H. S. & Dobrich, W. (1994) On the efcacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14, 245302. Sundelin, C., Magnusson, M. & Lagerberg, D. (2005) Child Health Services in transition: I. Theories, methods and launching. Acta Paediatrica, 94, 329336. Whitehurst, G. & Lonigan, C. (2001) Emergent literacy: development from prereaders to readers. In: Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Vol. 1 (eds S. Neuman & D. Dickinson), pp. 1129. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA. Whitehurst, G., Falco, F., Lonigan, C., Fischel. J., DeBaryshe, B. & Valdez-Menchaca, M. (1988) Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552559. 266 M. Westerlund and D. Lagerberg 2008 The Authors Journal compilation 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Child: care, health and development, 34, 2, 257266