Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
"
>
$
">
2)4;3<5
!
/ "+)#!
"
!
#
$
(
*
(
!"#
< "!
!
>
% &
' ( )
*++,- ./0 /,++1 ?
'( <@6
$#%
&
6
/ & '
t xp ers ilit to p
!
=
! (
* &23'*435
" ('
-
#
implement of police power
2)!(&,+3/6+1787
&9':
,,++- ;</ /,,<15
0
) ' (
ltex Phils. Inc. vs &9':
,*=+=
; + /,,*1
!,
!
/
!!
A
*! >
A
!
$
c c
!
* )&
>
!
$
Phil. Gu r nt o., Inc. < #%
">(
vs ommissioner of Intern l Revenue, 13 SR 775).
;
* ,
!
)&)2*(3B(;5
,
!
/ #%
&
1
! * "
<
# & & !
.
#
6 "
=
!
- "
Gomez vs P lom r, 25 SR 829) !-
(
hurchill, et l. vs oncepcion 34 Phil 969)
orenzo vs Pos s, 64 Phil 353)
< #!
ollector
:
of Intern l Revenue vs. Goorich Intern tion l Ruer o., Sept. 6,
1965)"
!
(
*culloch vs * rl n,
C ;
)
(
/ &)! >
?
!
"
!
%
* ct n eu Intern tion l irport uthorit
vs * rcos, Sept. 11, 1996,
&
/0,/+/1
!
% "
?
G
,
c c
<
.
>
$
ilittop principle) /,+0
Rox s, et l vs pril 26, 1968)
?
?
$
9
!
#%
"
?
Dhen th t
l s the golen egg$ (
$ /
>
9
%
?
!
A * !>
A <
>
(
&
1
$
.
&
m ,
$
/
>
Gincience
C
:
E
meric n Ruer o. c se, 10963, pril 30, 1963)
* "& -#! '
3. "
c c
ommissioner of Intern l Revenue vs John Got mco n Sons,
Inc., et. l., 31092, Fe. 27, 1987) * 0
/
>
)
9
6 "
)& !"& 2 &)&
(
* ce vs )&
* c r ig,supr )
)& !"
/ /-
/&>
)""
4
F(
&
>
*
/)! >
4
' 3
&
a 0
/
/
*
*
$
/
>
?
<
<
4
6
6
?
* 1">
!&
! >
@ &!
/
/
/ )&>
& 1
*
*
$
"&
* )& >
" >
&1
:
"
&
G
)
1
&
"
< 0 >
/
/
6 >
*
*
F(
<
<
-
!")
6
& 6
/ '
:
9
(
3 7
H
0/3=601
c c
" ))
G
"
?
/
*+&<1 ( F
&#
/
/
2. #
Sec. 234 of the
oc l Government oe, properties which re ctu ll, irectl n *
*
exclusivel use for religious, ch rit le n euc tion l purposes
re not ex ctlexempt from re l propert t xes ut re exempt from <
<
the imposition of speci l ssessments s well. see n) 6
6
< .
=
=
"-&
" >
-
-
&
/"- 0
0
/
/
?
*
*
<
<
7
6
6
&Philex *ining orp. vs IR,
294 SR 687; Repulic vs * mul o umer o., 6 SR 622)
=
=
"
-
-
? see Domingo vs G rlitos,
18904, June 29, 1963)
+
)3
/ )
* )
0)
&""&
< )
9':
/*=0@6 (*+ /,,+
"
"
#
(
/
?
2.
%
see
meric n * il ine vs it of Butu n, 12647, * 31, 1967 n )""
6!
""7
< #
%olentino vs Sec. of Fin nce, supr )
, ) )& ! -
"
,*+&*1(F
= )")-"
!3
,=( :
?
% /@ "
!
!
"
&! ) #
/ ) I
,*+&<1(F
* #
. 4
?
'
ctu ll, irectl n exclusivel
!
see olentino vs Secret r of Fin nce, 235 SR 630)
%
- ""
"
/ )
, /@ ( :
% *
"
/ (
<
% $
6
*
=
?
c c
- #
G7.
!
?
$
&/@/&,1&<1 :'1 /
//1)*"
)&
'7
"
, *+&61 ( F :
*
%
?
?
<
/* "" " 8 %
6
$
A
, = &*1 ( F
=
%
= &*1 ( F
$&
&*1'
/ #%
,4
?=4959><;5
% 4 H
%
/< " &
)
)"
#
4F( 4
4F()
&'(00/-1
?
?
, 6&61 ( LF
* 1"
% & , 4
?;4?5
1 9><;
" 5
/
$
3
(
'
*
%
<
<
! " # "! "!
# ! 4
?>495
1 9><;
6
5
=
&
1 :
?
%
- ) H
6 #
0! # !
!" ) 4
?>4?5
1
9><;5
"-
$
9:; <;
9= %:
9><;
c c
"
%
= &
4
?>4:5
1
!
9><;5
(
< )&-
% "
&
9AB
(73!
. 9>>;1
3G/,=-
!
3
%
73.
7( &sme vs ros, et l., G.R. No. 6 # "&
1
99886, * r. 31, 1993)
-) #%
- "
&"
,
=
@9><; > 3
)
9
!>
%
)#!>
1
# >
(
/
* ,
>
)#!>
60$, 666 $07
",
)
/
(
& Wells F rgo B nk v.
ollector 70 PHI 325; ollector v. Fisher 11622, J nu r, 1961)
* nil Electric o. vs tco 69 Phil 89)
">
!
33
!
4
3
the Philippines Government must get something in , $
>
return for the protection it gives to the insure propert in the Phils.
n re son of such protection, the insurer is enefite there.
* ""*
!>
(
%
%
!
?
1
0
!
c c
< "
6
F
%
A =
!
;
A !
G
stricter
ro er
7
A
"!>
4
"
:
9
4
&it of B guio vs
De eon, ct. 31, 1968)
"'4$
#
'4
4?5C#
/ $#
Doule t x tion in
$
its strict sense)
"
*
/
*
G
<
6 "
= G
G
-
* "&
Doule t x tion 6
'
in its ro sense) >
4?3
-"
"
?
,
-"
"
#, /
/ (
* !
A <
* (
6
A =
< (
-
A
6 (
/ ) >
= (
"
>
A
- (
>
") ) "
0
D
>
/
'
C )
* '
$
- )>
$
(
c c
,
+ )>
<
$ ) >
6
* 3 >
?
!
"
3
< ">
IR vs
Bothelo Shipping orp., 21633, June 29, 1967; IR vs P ,
20960, ct. 31, 1968)
G "
6 & >
/ ;
9
?
- * ;
.
< ;
.
four consecutive e rs couple with overst tement of
euction.
4
4 *!)"
4
?
?
(
!
?
= &
>
&*0- *00 )
9
1
. C"
(
/ (
#
" '
! " '
#&&
)
&&&
* (
"
" ' "
prospectivel
=
/
"
A
4
Fern nez vs Fern nez, 99 PHI 934)
A
*
4
9
A
Hil o vs ollector, 100 PHI 288) 4
<
-
"
#! 0
imprescriptile @0 $-$0
"
4:'
)
&&"
/ H
' H
/
H'
!
IR vs . G.R. No.
'
104171, Fe. 24, 1999) G
'G7
*#
" * 3
;
c c
)
&
IR vs Procter &
G mle Phil. G.R. No. 66838, 15 pril 1988.)
9
!! !
"
$
?
l
!
Interprovinci l utous vs. IR, 98 Phil 290)
l
!
S Po. Vs. , G.R. No 81446, 8 ug
(
1988
!
#
l (
&<1
D rit vs. ruz, 39910, 26 Sept. 1988)
l .
IR vs
Sec 6[ , 1997
.. G.R. No. 104151 n 105563, 10 * r 1995)
NIR)
l ( $
?
(
0/
/,,0 :'
ltex
vs. .. G.R. No. 104781, 10 Jul 1998)
?
!
*(
*0@
/,,0:'
!!
?
< (
!
* !
/ "
!
$* !
3
3
! !
!
! * "
! .
*er lco Secuirities orp. vs. S vell no, 36181 n 36748, '
:
<<
.
23 ct 1992). < "
9
u Unjieng, et. l. vs.
Except: Pos s, etc, 58 Phil 360)
4. "
c
& !
! Ver vs usi
!
!
33115, 29 June 1979).
!
!
* ce vs. * c r ig, G.R.
No. 8829, 8 June 1993r$
,
",,&
$##
6
!
$'
#
! $ c
!
/
$it umer vs. Domingo, 18611, 30 J n 1964).
A
*
=(
' !#
#
"
! #
Repulic vs. el R m ,
(
21108, 29 Nov. 1966)#
!
&Sec. 6 [B , 1997 NIR)
c c
&
! (
?
?
?
Sec. 6 [ , 1997 NIR1
(
S Po vs .
"
-)!1
$ 3
H
H'
$
.
H'
&/1
!
A
&*1
3
! (
Sec 6 [E , 1997 NIR).
$
?
?
-
*!,+
4
#
'( /6@= :
$
)c #
!
'( /6@=
!
!
?
A
! /
A
*
*@6 &(1 &M1
w ives in writing'(/6@=
?
?
Sec. 6 [ , 1997 NIR) Sec. 6[F , 1997 NIR).
(0&)
a$c c
:"
;
& 0""
B: ;?
%
A
3
A
A
B sic oncept n heor
ssets minus li ilities equ ls net worth $
?
c c
However,
;
-2H5 /,,0:'
?
"
45 !E #+
45
"
"
!
" !
!8
"
#+ #+
#
!
!
" ! r$ %
# "
*#
%"
9
)& #! ! ") # "
9
!
(
im o hui vs. Pos s, 47 Phil 460)
$
? $
I
IR vs. , supr ).
(
9
Philippine Refining
omp n vs. .., G.R. No. 1188794, 8 * 1996).
&/1
surch rge,
*=K
=@ K
A (
IR vs. u Unjieng, 26869, 6 ug. 1975)
&*1 interest
?
A
*=K
&<1
Secs. 247 to
252, 1997 NIR) / "
onnel
Bros. o. vs. IR, 15470, 26 Dec. 1963)
c c
* ( ? H'
:
!"
*=KIR vs. Repulic
ement orp., 35677, 10 ug. 1983)
?
?
< "
H
'( =6</
&
1
!
*0 &
<@ /,,0 :'1
& g n Electreic Sec. 249[ , 1997 NIR)
Power & ight o. vs IR, G.R. No. 60126, 25 Sept.
1985)
6
"&$
/.
.
'
'
*.
"
(
'
< .
"
(
' 4
"
&
/
* 4
$
< F(
6 7
= 4
- G
0 7
H'
&*@K1
'4;4G47.#497F4':;4:
Sec. 249 [ , 1997 NIR)
4
'
(
9
! / G
3
3
( * )
'3
*@K < )
6
= .
- 7('
Sec. 249 [B , 1997 NIR)
C
/ (
?
*
! * (
G
3
3
&/1
G !
?
&*1
?
&<1 (
B:G
( >
c c
>
(
G
;
;
?
?
*
4
4 ?
? I
(
&H 4 "
?
*/ '( /0A ' ( ( <@
/,+01
(
(
" H'
%
&'
$
3
'
C*, /,,,1 (
(
?
&
(
G*, /,-61 < "
&<1
H14
&***1
/ "
&/@1 :
)
* "
>
&/@1
:
.
.
6 "
<
G
:
)
(
:
.
.
c c
1(
/"
6 "
*"
?
< (
? >
?
&(
:
*/ /,+@1 &' )
! ; <@
6(
/,-<1
3
9
$'
( 9' = "
/ "
>( >
= - "
>
* "
<
0 "
H 4
>
/ " I
"
/
>
:
/@
*
>
=
&
< 1
&'1
&'' ;</ /,-*1 < "
N
(>
* "
>
$
/@
< "
> '
3
( ' (
&=1
=
:
"
O&=1
:
G
G
(
(
3
"
4
"
"
3
3
c c
"
"
"
"
>
/
-
*
!
> < ;
F
33
"
3
/ "
<
>
3
:
*
(
I
'
:
?
G
:
H
/
I
-@ A *
l .
( < ?
6
$
l " (
=
//
'(//*=
! 4?
I
" ?
(L3(P4'$'4;4G4
:
"&
( ?
&/1 H
3
.
?
?
&(3
1A
4
"
&*1 (3
.
A
:
.
c c
.
?
&/1
(
(
&/=1
(
A
3(:
(
G
$
&*1 (
3.1.2. Revenue Regul tions No.
1299 te Sept. 6, 1999).
.
H
'
.
)
G(:
!
0 1$
otherwise, the form l letter of
*
em n n ssessment notice sh ll e voi.
existing recors without nee of
ition l evience
?
.
)
G(:
*&)
newliscovere or ition l evience
?
!
&1A&1
Issu nce of ssessment A&1
A
6**+
/,,0:'3(:
?
&/+@1
Scope of l ims
ontents:
A
&'
(
)/--+< C</ /,-*1
$
(*0
'?
(G(
'
#
A
'
A
.
- $-0$0 16
A $--
(
<@
(
H'
4
.
((
(
"
?
(
&"8
c c
)
. "
G 9'
6
>
/ "
> (
=
=
>
&'1
* "
- "
N
(>
<
$
4 4
+ " I
"
' (
&=1
:
:
/@
(
""
-
=
&
< 1
&' ' ; </ &=1
/,-*1
, "
>
G
/@
/@ "
> (
"
=
"
3
// "
? ()
>
&' )
! "
;<@ /,-<1
/* "
(
"!#
>
>
A
/< "
>
>
/6 "
>
&
c c
6 "
?
:
H
-
=
I
0
+ ?
G
I
-@ A
,
.
(
$
/@
" (
4?
//
'(//*=
!
I
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
7;4;37'(:3'7F7:7:#4(L'4.7';(7.
" ?
/,,0
?
a
&
:
( ?
H
'
G
.
?
"
(
H
:
:
(!
&
. H
'
"
'
&61
G
6
B
c
* a!c.
=
!
- ;
.
"
3
>
3 H
'
:
(
(
'
:
c c
G
(
# # # c
?
c .
-&.1
=
*
!
c ! .
! &(1Ex min tion of Returns n Determin tion of
&(1
x Due. (
?
? A
!
!
&H1
Provie, however;
!
H
(
3
!
Provie, h t
&<1
Provie, further,
?
&H1 F ilure to Sumit Require Returns,
St tements, Reports n other Documents.
"
?
A
&1
?
?
!
A
&G1
&1 uthorit to onuct Inventort king,
? A
surveill nce n to Prescrie Presumptive Gross
S les n Receipts.
&41
?
?
c c
(
prim f cie
"
&.1 uthorit of the ommissioner to inquire into
B nk Deposit ccounts. :
?
//< *<0
'(:
/6@=
!
?
?
&/1
A
&*1
*@6 &(1 &*1
&G1uthorit to ermin te x le Perio." ' ( :
/6@=
?
&91 uthorit to ccreit n Register x
3
gents.
?
H
"
&/*@1
C / /,,+
?
&<1
?
H
&/1
&*1
.
&41 uthorit of the ommissioner to Prescrie
I
Re l Propert V lues.
!
3
.
!
&-@1
.
.
(
!
.
 uthorit of the ommissioner to Prescrie
ition l Proceur l or Document r
Requirements.
&/1
?
&*1
3
c c
;
a
.
?
.
?
&/@K1
A
.
Provie, however ?
&6@K1
"
7
&1
&3/ @@@@@@1
.A
4
H
&1
&61G
HA 4,5#
#!
&1
*@6 &(1 &H1
Provie, however, &/1
A
.
&*1
&3=@@ @@@1
(
&1
&1
'
45
G
( '
G
) (
G
' G
7
A
:
&1
&*1
Provie, however,
?A:
* + ! $
4
***
&<1
(
(
Provie,
?
!
&<1
*<@
.
Provie
Provie, further,
?AB
#
c$)
45 "" !" ! &
" ;
#
'
&-1
&/1 (
A
&*1
A
A
A
Provie
c c
7
&*1
D
10 -$$$$-@
?A;
$)
?AG
! a c$ )
45a $6
?
?
?
?
!
7
&1 H
&3/ @@@ @@@1
' G 7
7
&3/ @@@ @@@1
!
A
A
?
?
&1H
?
4
(
&/@1
'
Provie, however,
G7
''
G
Provie,
!
7
.
&3/@@1
Provie, further,
' '
G
?
4,5 *
$ (
H
' ?
?
?
?
!
?A=
!
a
c$)
9
3
?
)
3
(
'
G
?
3
?
?
A
?
!
&<@1
T
c c
"&/@1
! Provie, however,
' '
G
6
?
3
!
?
.
(
?
?A<
! a
$)
!
!
A
?9A
a +
$)
?99
&
$)"
&*1
G
?9?
!
+ a $ )
"
?
4
9?<:9G.?>9>>>5
-
s etween t x tion n religion, the l tter prev ils '
! H'
3
'
* !
$
127/7r G
&3'G1
/,+- /,+0 /,++
**&<1(F
30 6,+ 6<6-=3< @/= *<-<=
/,+-/,+0
7;/ /,,=
3'G
G7C 3
?
$
$
he gift t x w s n excise t x upon the use
m e of the properties, upon the exercise of the privilege of receiving 7 ; *< /,,=
the properties.his kin of t x is not within the exempting provision
G7C
of the constitution.
; /0 /,,=
#
G
$ ?
&
**&<1(F
(
$
($
(
(
8
$ 167146r
(
I
he phr se Guse exclusivel for euc tion l purposes is not limite
( ( (
to propert ctu ll inispens le therefor ut extens to f cilities,
which re incient l to n re son l necess r to the
ccomplishment of s i purposes
c c
/ "
(
* "
C 6 /,,6
'$
$
I
D
he filing of the crimin l compl int with the DJ c nnot e
'
.
$
construe s form l ssessment. :
I
(/< /,,<
n ssessment must e sent to n receive the
t xp er, n must em n p ment of the t xes escrie therein
G7C
within specific perio.
$
$
C
A
"
$
G7C
D
n ssessment is not necess r efore crimin l ch rges Fr u c nnot e presume.
c n e file. (
?he IR h ,
in such t x ev sion c ses, iscretion on whether to issue n
ssessment, or to file crimin l c se g inst the t xp er, or to o H'
oth. .
$
H
H'
#%
0(
$
H'
.
1 H
.
99>:??.B9>>=
*=6*=- /,,0
-
:'
(
C/ /,,<
7C
/ /,,< ' ' ;
:
<0,<
J 4)?:9>;B5
.
&.
1
7(< /,,< .
?
-
;(!
; /= /,=+#
?
(
+
/,6=
/,=/
H'G
/,,<
( < /,,< .
7
F(
/,,*
:
*+ /,=* H'
(U:('
?
<@
7 /* /,,< 30*< @<*--
3<+/ @,-@0
;
0 /,,<
7 . *@ /,=< (U:('$
G7C
.
7 ( / /,== (U:('
,
( (
(U:('
F(
/,,*
/,6- **0KA =-6K
/,60A ,=K
/,6+A 6+-K
/,6,A
D
7
/@
(U:('$
= &
<
1
whenever the
government is pl ce t is v nt ge s to prevent its l wful gent
from m king proper ssessment of t x li ilities ue to f lse or
fr uulent returns intene to ev e p ment of t xes or f ilure to
the returns, the perio of 10 e rs provie for in the l w from the
iscover of the f lsit, fr u or omission even seems to e
in equ te n shoul e the one enforce.