The aim of life is to follow God's word and bring > others to Christ. If the bible is Gods word then there will be no > contraditions. He scholars claim that these gos$els are written by "oly +$irit > through (atthew and )uke.!t means it written from > same source.
The aim of life is to follow God's word and bring > others to Christ. If the bible is Gods word then there will be no > contraditions. He scholars claim that these gos$els are written by "oly +$irit > through (atthew and )uke.!t means it written from > same source.
The aim of life is to follow God's word and bring > others to Christ. If the bible is Gods word then there will be no > contraditions. He scholars claim that these gos$els are written by "oly +$irit > through (atthew and )uke.!t means it written from > same source.
> thank you justin for your answer which you said:
> "the aim of life is to follow God's word and bring
> others to Christ." > > but let us to exam: is that aim is true? > > if the bible is Gods word then there will be no > contraditions. > > let us to check the bible: > > ! think for this answer we need to use our mind > without affection of emotion. ! think in this way we > must to exam to find the truth without emotional > lie. > > "ere is my examination #i think there is some > fanatic $eo$le will not agree with me in this way > but it is the way to find the truth%: > > &s we know' in the bible there is four gos$els' two > of these gos$els are (atthew and )uke. *he scholars > claim that these gos$els are written by "oly +$irit > through (atthew and )uke. !t means it written from > same source. > > ,ow' let us ha-e a dee$ly look on these gos$els: > > *he Genealogy of .esus Christ: > > !t mentioned in #(atthew /:/0/1% and in #)uke > 2:32024% > 5hen you read these you will ha-e these 6uestions: > > /% "ow could (atthew and )uke $ut genealogy for the > Christ e-en we know and belie-e he was born by his > -irgin mother' (ary without father?7 > > 3% !f we count the genealogy in (atthew from &braham > to .esus the result will be 8/ names but in )uke it > will be 9: names. !t means )uke added /9 names or > (atthew lacked /9 names. > > 2% !n #(atthew /:/1% > /8 generations from &braham to ;a-id' > /8 generations from ;a-id to the exile to <abylon' > /8 generations from exile to .esus > it means the total will be 83 > but if we count it will be 8/ > the generations from exile to .esus is /2 not /8 > does not "oly +$irit know how to count?7 > > 8% !n (atthew .esus belongs to +olomon son of > ;a-id > !n )uke .esus belongs to ,athan son of > ;a-id > *o know' +olomon and ,athan are not one > $erson > but they are brothers as in #3 +amuel > 9:/20/8%. > !s "oly +$irit confused about who is the forefather > of .esus?7 > > 9% !n (atthew' =erubbable and his father +healtiel > are fore fathers of >liakim. > !n )uke' >liakim is forefather of =erubbable and > +healtiel77 > > :% !n (atthew' .ose$h the Car$enter is the son of > .acob > !n )uke' .ose$h the Car$enter is the son of "eli7 > > 5ho is the father of .ose$h? > > 1% if (atthew and )uke wrote by same source #"oly > +$irit%' then why there is contradictions?7 > ?or the answer we do not ha-e only to choose one of > two choices: > a% "oly +$irit is liar. > b% @r these gos$els were written by human hands > using in-estigations which risk to right or wrong > and no $rincibility of "oly +$irit. > ! think u will choose the second answer which $ro-ed > by )uke in his intruduction: > A/(any ha-e undertaken to draw u$ an account of the > things that ha-e been fulfilled among us' 3just as > they were handed down to us by those who from the > first were eyewitnesses and ser-ants of the word. > 2*herefore' since ! myself ha-e carefully > in-estigated e-erything from the beginning' it > seemed good also to me to write an orderly account > for you' most excellent *heo$hilus' 8so that you may > know the certainty of the things you ha-e been > taught.B > #)uke /:/08% > > ,ow let us be more aware to say that we trick > oursel-es about "oly +$irit. > > > your faithfull' > > hashem